1. Impact of mediastinal tumor burden and lymphatic spread in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A secondary analysis of the multicenter randomized PET-Plan trial.
- Author
-
Gkika E, Dejonckheere CS, Sahlmann J, Barth SA, Schimek-Jasch T, Adebahr S, Hecht M, Miederer M, Brose A, Binder H, König J, Grosu AL, Nestle U, and Rimner A
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Aged, Prospective Studies, Adult, Mediastinal Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Mediastinal Neoplasms radiotherapy, Mediastinal Neoplasms therapy, Mediastinal Neoplasms pathology, Mediastinal Neoplasms mortality, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Chemoradiotherapy, Radiopharmaceuticals, Aged, 80 and over, Lymph Nodes pathology, Lymph Nodes diagnostic imaging, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung pathology, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung diagnostic imaging, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung radiotherapy, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung therapy, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung mortality, Lung Neoplasms pathology, Lung Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Lung Neoplasms therapy, Lung Neoplasms radiotherapy, Lung Neoplasms mortality, Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography methods, Lymphatic Metastasis, Tumor Burden
- Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this secondary analysis of the prospective randomized phase 2 PET-Plan trial (ARO-2009-09; NCT00697333) was to evaluate the impact of mediastinal tumor burden and lymphatic spread in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: All patients treated per protocol (n = 172) were included. Patients received isotoxically dose-escalated chemoradiotherapy up to a total dose of 60-74 Gy in 30-37 fractions, aiming as high as possible while adhering to normal tissue constraints. Radiation treatment (RT) planning was based on an
18 F-FDG PET/CT targeting all lymph node (LN) stations containing CT positive LNs (i.e. short axis diameter > 10 mm), even if PET-negative (arm A) or targeting only LN stations containing PET-positive nodes (arm B). LN stations were classified into echelon 1 (ipsilateral hilum), 2 (ipsilateral station 4 and 7), and 3 (rest of the mediastinum, contralateral hilum). The endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and freedom from local progression (FFLP)., Results: The median follow-up time (95 % confidence interval [CI]) was 41.1 (33.8 - 50.4) months. Patients with a high absolute number of PET-positive LN stations had worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.09; 95 % CI 0.99 - 1.18; p = 0.05) and PFS (HR = 1.12; 95 % CI 1.04 - 1.20; p = 0.003), irrespective of treatment arm allocation. The prescribed RT dose to the LNs did not correlate with any of the endpoints when considering all patients. However, in patients in arm B (i.e., PET-based selective nodal irradiation), prescribed RT dose to each LN station correlated significantly with FFLP (HR=0.45; 95 % CI 0.24-0.85; p = 0.01). Furthermore, patients with involvement of echelon 3 LN stations had worse PFS (HR = 2.22; 95 % CI 1.16-4.28; p = 0.02), also irrespective of allocation., Conclusion: Mediastinal tumor burden and lymphatic involvement patterns influence outcome in patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced NSCLC. Higher dose to LNs did not improve OS, but did improve FFLP in patients treated with PET-based dose-escalated RT., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: [MM reports consultant fees from Novartis, Roche, Telix, and Veraxa. The other authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.]., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF