1,415 results on '"Medical physicist"'
Search Results
2. Current status of the educational environment to acquire and maintain the professional skills of radiotherapy technology and medical physics specialists in Japan: a nationwide survey.
- Author
-
Hayashi, Naoki, Okumura, Masahiko, Nakamura, Mitsuhiro, Ishihara, Yoshitomo, Ota, Seiichi, Tohyama, Naoki, Shimomura, Kohei, Okamoto, Hiroyuki, and Onishi, Hiroshi
- Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the educational environment of radiotherapy technology and medical physics specialists (RTMP) in Japan. We conducted a nationwide questionnaire survey in radiotherapy institutions between June and August 2022. Participants were asked questions regarding the educational system, perspectives on updating RTMP's skills and qualifications, and perspectives on higher education for RTMP at radiotherapy institutions. The results were then analyzed in detail according to three factors: whether the hospital was designed for cancer care, whether it was a Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO)-accredited hospital, and whether it was an intensity-modulated radiation therapy charged hospital. Responses were obtained from 579 (69%) nationwide radiation therapy institutions. For non-qualified RTMP, 10% of the institutions had their own educational systems, only 17% of institutions provided on-the-job training, and 84% of institutions encouraged participation in educational lectures and workshops in academic societies. However, for qualified RTMP, 3.0% of institutions had their own educational systems, only 8.9% of the institutions provided on-the-job training, and 83% encouraged participation in academic conferences and workshops. Less than 1% of the facilities offered salary increases for certification, whereas 8.2% offered consideration for occupational promotion. Regarding the educational environment, JASTRO-accredited hospitals were better than general hospitals. Few institutions have their own educational systems for qualified and non-qualified RTMP, but they encourage them to attend educational seminars and conferences. It is desirable to provide systematic education and training by academic and professional organizations to maintain the skills of individuals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Triple Negative Breast Cancer and Non-Triple Negative Breast Cancer Recurrence Prediction Using Boosting Models
- Author
-
Azeroual, Saadia, Ben-Bouazza, Fatima-ezzahraa, Naqi, Amine, Sebihi, Rajaa, Kacprzyk, Janusz, Series Editor, Gomide, Fernando, Advisory Editor, Kaynak, Okyay, Advisory Editor, Liu, Derong, Advisory Editor, Pedrycz, Witold, Advisory Editor, Polycarpou, Marios M., Advisory Editor, Rudas, Imre J., Advisory Editor, Wang, Jun, Advisory Editor, Ezziyyani, Mostafa, editor, and Balas, Valentina Emilia, editor
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. A national survey on the medical physics workload of external beam radiotherapy in Japan.
- Author
-
Tohyama, Naoki, Okamoto, Hiroyuki, Shimomura, Kohei, Kurooka, Masahiko, Kawamorita, Ryu, Ota, Seiichi, Kojima, Toru, Hayashi, Naoki, Okumura, Masahiko, Nakamura, Masaru, Nakamura, Mitsuhiro, Myojoyama, Atsushi, and Onishi, Hiroshi
- Subjects
EXTERNAL beam radiotherapy ,MEDICAL physics ,RADIOTHERAPY safety ,MEDICAL specialties & specialists ,CANCER hospitals ,COMPUTED tomography - Abstract
Several staffing models are used to determine the required medical physics staffing, including radiotherapy technologists, of radiation oncology departments. However, since Japanese facilities tend to be smaller in scale than foreign ones, those models might not apply to Japan. Therefore, in this study, we surveyed workloads in Japan to estimate the optimal medical physics staffing in external beam radiotherapy. A total of 837 facilities were surveyed to collect information regarding radiotherapy techniques and medical physics specialists (RTMPs). The survey covered facility information, staffing, patient volume, equipment volume, workload and quality assurance (QA) status. Full-time equivalent (FTE) factors were estimated from the workload and compared with several models. Responses were received from 579 facilities (69.2%). The median annual patient volume was 369 at designated cancer care hospitals (DCCHs) and 252 across all facilities. In addition, the median FTE of RTMPs was 4.6 at DCCHs and 3.0 at all sites, and the average QA implementation rate for radiotherapy equipment was 69.4%. Furthermore, advanced treatment technologies have increased workloads, particularly in computed tomography simulations and treatment planning tasks. Compared to published models, larger facilities (over 500 annual patients) had a shortage of medical physics staff. In very small facilities (about 140 annual patients), the medical physics staffing requirement was estimated to be 0.5 FTE, implying that employing a full-time medical physicist would be inefficient. However, ensuring the quality of radiotherapy is an important issue, given the limited number of RTMPs. Our study provides insights into optimizing staffing and resource allocation in radiotherapy departments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. A review of MRI studies in Africa with special focus on quantitative MRI: Historical development, current status and the role of medical physicists.
- Author
-
Hasford, Francis, Mumuni, Abdul Nashirudeen, Trauernicht, Christoph, Ige, Taofeeq Abdallah, Inkoom, Stephen, Okeji, Mark, Nathaniel, Eja-Egwu Uche, Toutaoui, Nadia Khelassi, Geraldo, Malick, Amadou, Konfe, Uwizeyimana, Canesius, Samba, Odette Ngano, Attalla, Ehab Marouf, Kebede, Ejigu, Edou-Mbo, Gervais, Okoko, Elly Oking, Alghazirr, Zahra Omar, Pokoo-Aikins, Mark, Sosu, Edem Kwabla, and Boadu, Mary
- Abstract
• The study analyzes MRI availability in 32 (59%) of the 54 African countries. • MR systems in 4 northern countries make up 53% of all MR systems available in the 32 studied African countries. • Less than a third of the surveyed African countries have 1 MR system for less than a million population. • The 32 studied African countries altogether have average of 1 MRI system per million population. • Published literature on brain examinations dominate quantitative MRI published studies in Africa in the last 5 years. This scoping review provides overview on the historical and major developments, current status, quantitative magnetic resonance (MR) studies and the role of medical physics bodies in MR imaging in Africa. The study analyzed MRI availability in 32 (59 %) of the 54 African countries. South Africa and Egypt have the most dominant MR systems. Number of MR systems in the 4 northern countries (Egypt, Morocco, Algeria and Libya) alone constitute 53 % of the total number of machines in the studied countries. Less than one-third of the countries have 1 MR system serving less than a million population. Libya recorded the most MR systems per million population. The studied countries altogether have an average of 1 machine per million population. The private sector far dominates number of installed MR systems across the region, making up two-thirds of the distribution. A major challenge was revealed where less than 3 % of Medical Physicists in the studied countries are engaged in MRI facilities. Review of MRI published studies in the last 5 years indicates dominance of literature on brain studies and most of such published works coming from Nigeria. Only 7 out of 27 published studies reviewed were quantitative. The African region has no dedicated MRI physics societies; however, the regional medical physics body and national associations have big roles to play in developing MRI through education, research, training and leveraging on awareness creation. This review is the first of such wide scale study on MRI availability and quantitative studies in the African region. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Current status of the working environment of brachytherapy in Japan: a nationwide survey-based analysis focusing on radiotherapy technologists and medical physicists.
- Author
-
Kojima T, Okamoto H, Kurooka M, Tohyama N, Tsuruoka I, Nemoto M, Shimomura K, Myojoyama A, Ikushima H, Ohno T, and Ohnishi H
- Abstract
Brachytherapy (BT), especially in high dose rate (HDR), has become increasingly complex owing to the use of image-guided techniques and the introduction of advanced applicators. Consequently, radiotherapy technologists and medical physicists (RTMPs) require substantial training to enhance their knowledge and technical skills in image-guided brachytherapy. However, the current status of the RTMP workload, individual abilities and quality control (QC) of BT units in Japan remains unclear. To address this issue, we conducted a questionnaire survey from June to August 2022 in all 837 radiation treatment facilities in Japan involving RTMPs. This survey focused on gynecological cancers treated with HDR-BT (GY-HDR) and permanent prostate implantation using low-dose-rate BT (PR-LDR). The responses revealed that the average working time in the overall process for HDR varied: 120 min for intracavitary BT and 180 min for intracavitary BT combined with interstitial BT. The QC implementation rate, in accordance with domestic guidelines, was 65% for GY-HDR and 44% for PR-LDR, which was lower than the 69% observed for external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Additionally, the implementation rate during regular working hours was low. Even among RTMP working in facilities performing BT, the proportion of those able to perform QC for BT units was ~30% for GY-HDR and <20% for PR-LDR, significantly lower than the 80% achieved for EBRT. This study highlights the vulnerabilities of Japan's BT unit QC implementation structure. Addressing these issues requires appropriate training of the RTMP staff to safely perform BT tasks and improvements in practical education and training systems., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Technologies of teaching students of a medical university in the process of studying physical disciplines
- Author
-
Zoirova, Lola Khamidovna, Tukhtamishova, Malika Sherali kizi, and Sultonova, Nafosat Nizomitdin kizi
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Free Educational Android Mobile Application for Radiobiology. Evaluation of Radiation Oncologist and Medical Physicist
- Author
-
Camil Ciprian MIRESTEAN, Alexandru Dumitru ZARA, Roxana Irina IANCU, and Dragos Petru Teodor IANCU
- Subjects
radiobiology ,education ,medical physicist ,radiation oncology ,smart device ,apps ,Medicine ,Medicine (General) ,R5-920 - Abstract
The use of mobile devices and applications dedicated to different medical fields has improved the quality and facilitated medical care, especially in the last 10 years. The number of applications running on the software platforms of smart phones or other smart devices is constantly growing. Radiotherapy also benefits from applications (apps) for TNM staging of cancers, for target volume delineation and toxicity management but also from radiobiological apps for calculating equivalent dose schemes for different dose fractionation regimens. In the context of the increasingly frequent use of altered fractionation schemes, the use of radiobiological models and calculations based on the linear quadratic model (LQ) becomes a necessity. We aim to evaluate free radiobiology apps for the Android software platform. Given the global educational deficit, the lack of experts and the concordance between radiobiology education and the need to use basic clinical notions of modern radiotherapy, the existence of free apps for the Android platform running on older generation processors can transform even an old smart device in a powerful „radiobiology station.” Apps for radiobiology can help the radiation oncologist and medical physicist with responsibilities in radiotherapy treatment planning in the context of accelerated adoption of hypo-fractionation regimens and calculation of the effect of treatment gaps, a topic of interest in the COVID-19 pandemic context. Radiobiology apps can also partially fill the educational gap in radiobiology by arousing the interest of young radiation oncologists to deepen the growing universe of fundamental and clinical radiobiology.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. The necessity of implementation of medical physicists’ certification in Ukraine
- Author
-
L. I. Aslamova, Ie. V. Kulich, and L.V. Shmyhliuk
- Subjects
medical physicist ,certification ,radiation protection. ,Atomic physics. Constitution and properties of matter ,QC170-197 - Abstract
Medical physics is a dynamic and constantly growing field of applied physics mainly directed towards the applications of physics principles to health care. Among the technological novations there is the optimization of image quality for magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound diagnostics, and computer tomography; development and use of high energy linear accelerators with sophisticated options for dose delivery; computerized treatment planning systems, record and verification systems; overall integration of computers into the routine clinical work. The key role of the medical physicist is widely recognized to ensure the safe and effective use of modern equipment for medical exposure. Medical physicists are involved in four basic activities: clinical service, research, and development, teaching, and management/administration. In addition, they should be familiar with the safety culture and promote this principle among the medical staff for the improvement of radiation safety, setting an example by their behaviour. There is no the best practice for the certification of medical physicists in international experience. The paper presents an attempt to analyse international standards and propose recommendations for the implementation of medical physicist’ certification in Ukraine. According to the authors, this will strongly influence on nation’s health.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Professional ethics in the French medical physicist community: Survey results and implications.
- Author
-
Dejean, Catherine, Viellard, Térence, Caron, Jérôme, Lisbona, Albert, and Moreau, Matthieu
- Abstract
• Professional Ethics: conducting a survey to evaluate French MP feeling. • Training in Professional Ethics for Medical Physicists in France is too low. • Creation of a working group to address the highlighted problem areas. • Providing a professional code of ethics. Since 2017, in France, medical physicists (MP) are finally defined by law as health professionals and as such, the roles and responsibilities of an MP lean on those medical professional ethics but MPs lack initial or continuing training in this subject. In order to find out how our colleagues feel about this subject, the following survey was conducted. French Society of Medical Physics (SFPM) designed a web survey addressed to its members and non-members concerning ethics based on the 2013 AAPM work; experience and training were highlighted as particularly important within the survey structure. 249 answers were collected and showed a pronounced concern at the lack of initial and continuous training in this subject. Professional experience of non-ethical behaviour was attributed to the lack of training, resources or competences and hostile work environments. To address the shortcomings highlighted in the survey, SFPM has created a dedicated voluntary working group aimed at producing a professional code of ethics for MP and training modules to be applied at entry level or as continuing professional development for education. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Fear psychosis for the medical physicists' profession in the worldwide COVID-19 crisis
- Author
-
Mahasin Gazi and Biplab Sarkar
- Subjects
coronavirus infectious disease 2019 pandemic ,medical physicist ,medical physics ,radiation oncology ,severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 ,Medicine - Abstract
Background: The coronavirus infectious disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread over 213 countries around the world and two international conveyances. This has become a cause of public health emergencies as well as a crisis internationally. Realising its deadlier effects the World Health Organisation has already declared this crisis as a pandemic on 11th, March, 2020. Material and Methods: Hospitals authority mostly do not provide complete personal protective equipment (PPE) for medical physicists every day as in general, they do not come in direct contact with patients frequently, shortages of PPE and economic barriers. Results: In this commentary, we have highlighted different aspects of fear psychosis dominantly acting on medical physicists working in the hospital where both confirmed and suspected COVID-19 patients are being treated during this pandemic. Further, a series of novel methods are proposed to reduce the risk of viral exposure for medical physicist community and other health care workers, and patients. Conclusion: In the absence of proper PPE, medical physicists should maintain proper physical distancing along with wearing the available protective devices (gloves and face mask) avoid casual touching of the mouth and nose to reduce the risk of infection.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Professional quality of life and burnout among medical physicists working in radiation oncology: The role of alexithymia and empathy
- Author
-
Marialaura Di Tella, Valentina Tesio, Jenny Bertholet, Anne Gasnier, Elisabet Gonzalez del Portillo, Mateusz Spalek, Jean-Emmanuel Bibault, Gerben Borst, Wouter Van Elmpt, Daniela Thorwarth, Laura Mullaney, Kathrine Røe Redalen, Ludwig Dubois, Cyrus Chargari, Sophie Perryck, Steven Petit, Myriam Lybeer, Lorys Castelli, and Pierfrancesco Franco
- Subjects
Burnout ,Professional quality of life ,Empathy ,Personality ,Radiation oncology professionals ,Medical physicist ,Medical physics. Medical radiology. Nuclear medicine ,R895-920 ,Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens ,RC254-282 - Abstract
Background and purpose: The professional quality of life of radiation oncology professionals can be influenced by different contributing factors, including personality traits. Alexithymia involves deficits in emotion processing and awareness. Empathy is the ability to understand another’s ‘state of mind/emotion’. We investigated professional quality of life, including burnout, in radiation oncology, exploring the role of alexithymia and empathy and targeting the population of medical physicists (MPs), since this professional category is usually underrepresented in surveys exploring professional well-being in radiation oncology and MPs may experience professional distress given the increasing complexity of multimodal cancer care. Material and methods: An online survey was addressed to ESTRO members. Participants filled out three questionnaires to evaluate alexithymia, empathy and professional quality of life: a) Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20); b) Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI); c) Professional Quality of Life Scale (ProQoL). Professional quality of life as per ProQoL was considered as dependent variable. The three domains of the ProQoL, namely compassion satisfaction (CS), secondary traumatic stress (STS) and burnout were correlated with alexithymia (as per TAS-20) and empathy (as per IRI with three subcategories: empathic concern, perspective taking and personal distress) and demographic/professional characteristics as independent variables. Generalized linear modeling was used. Significant covariates on univariate linear regression analysis were included in the multivariate linear regression model. Results: A total of 308 medical physicists completed all questionnaires. Alexithymia as per TAS-20 was correlated to decreased CS (β = −0.25, p
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Managing Radiotherapy Practice during Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: Medical Physicist's Perspective
- Author
-
Bhaveshwar Yadav, Gautam Sarma, Mithu Barthakur, Pranjal Goswami, and Shachindra Goswami
- Subjects
cancer ,coronavirus disease 2019 ,medical physicist ,radiotherapy ,Medical physics. Medical radiology. Nuclear medicine ,R895-920 ,Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens ,RC254-282 - Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has now become the largest global health issue. The World Health Organization on March 11, 2020, declared COVID-19 disease as a global pandemic. We have formulated certain strategies based on published evidences to help medical physicists to formulate their own protocols to carry out planning and treatment. Social distancing, sanitization, and segregation are crucial for all. Time, distance, and shielding are essential criteria for radiation safety and it remains unchanged for COVID-19 too, as quarantine time, social distancing, and face/body shielding are important.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. AAPM Task Group 241: A medical physicist's guide to MRI‐guided focused ultrasound body systems.
- Author
-
Payne, Allison, Chopra, Rajiv, Ellens, Nicholas, Chen, Lili, Ghanouni, Pejman, Sammet, Steffen, Diederich, Chris, ter Haar, Gail, Parker, Dennis, Moonen, Chrit, Stafford, Jason, Moros, Eduardo, Schlesinger, David, Benedict, Stanley, Wear, Keith, Partanen, Ari, and Farahani, Keyvan
- Subjects
- *
PHYSICISTS , *MAGNETIC resonance imaging , *MEDICAL physics , *WORKFLOW , *QUALITY assurance - Abstract
Magnetic resonance‐guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is a completely non‐invasive technology that has been approved by FDA to treat several diseases. This report, prepared by the American Association of Physicist in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group 241, provides background on MRgFUS technology with a focus on clinical body MRgFUS systems. The report addresses the issues of interest to the medical physics community, specific to the body MRgFUS system configuration, and provides recommendations on how to successfully implement and maintain a clinical MRgFUS program. The following sections describe the key features of typical MRgFUS systems and clinical workflow and provide key points and best practices for the medical physicist. Commonly used terms, metrics and physics are defined and sources of uncertainty that affect MRgFUS procedures are described. Finally, safety and quality assurance procedures are explained, the recommended role of the medical physicist in MRgFUS procedures is described, and regulatory requirements for planning clinical trials are detailed. Although this report is limited in scope to clinical body MRgFUS systems that are approved or currently undergoing clinical trials in the United States, much of the material presented is also applicable to systems designed for other applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Free Educational Android Mobile Application for Radiobiology. Evaluation of Radiation Oncologist and Medical Physicist.
- Author
-
MIRESTEAN, Camil Ciprian, ZARA, Alexandru Dumitru, IANCU, Roxana Irina, and Teodor IANCU, Dragos Petru
- Subjects
- *
RADIOBIOLOGY , *MOBILE apps , *RADIOTHERAPY treatment planning , *TUMOR classification , *COVID-19 pandemic , *CANCER radiotherapy , *PHYSICAL fitness mobile apps - Abstract
The use of mobile devices and applications dedicated to different medical fields has improved the quality and facilitated medical care, especially in the last 10 years. The number of applications running on the software platforms of smart phones or other smart devices is constantly growing. Radiotherapy also benefits from applications (apps) for TNM staging of cancers, for target volume delineation and toxicity management but also from radiobiological apps for calculating equivalent dose schemes for different dose fractionation regimens. In the context of the increasingly frequent use of altered fractionation schemes, the use of radiobiological models and calculations based on the linear quadratic model (LQ) becomes a necessity. We aim to evaluate free radiobiology apps for the Android software platform. Given the global educational deficit, the lack of experts and the concordance between radiobiology education and the need to use basic clinical notions of modern radiotherapy, the existence of free apps for the Android platform running on older generation processors can transform even an old smart device in a powerful „radiobiology station.” Apps for radiobiology can help the radiation oncologist and medical physicist with responsibilities in radiotherapy treatment planning in the context of accelerated adoption of hypo-fractionation regimens and calculation of the effect of treatment gaps, a topic of interest in the COVID-19 pandemic context. Radiobiology apps can also partially fill the educational gap in radiobiology by arousing the interest of young radiation oncologists to deepen the growing universe of fundamental and clinical radiobiology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Recommended procedures and responsibilities for radiosurgery (SRS) and extracranial stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT): report of the SEOR in collaboration with the SEFM.
- Author
-
Conde-Moreno, A. J., Zucca Aparicio, D., Pérez-Calatayud, M. J., López-Campos, F., Celada Álvarez, F., Rubio Rodríguez, C., Fernández-Letón, P., Gómez-Caamaño, A., and Contreras Martínez, J.
- Abstract
Today, patient management generally requires a multidisciplinary approach. However, due to the growing knowledge base and increasing complexity of Medicine, clinical practice has become even more specialised. Radiation oncology is not immune to this trend towards subspecialisation, which is particularly evident in ablative radiotherapy techniques that require high dose fractions, such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The aim of the present report is to establish the position of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR), in collaboration with the Spanish Society of Medical Physics (SEFM), with regard to the roles and responsibilities of healthcare professionals involved in performing SRS and SBRT. The need for this white paper is motivated due to the recent changes in Spanish Legislation (Royal Decree [RD] 601/2019, October 18, 2019) governing the use and optimization of radiotherapy and radiological protection for medical exposure to ionizing radiation (article 11, points 4 and 5) [1 ], which states: "In radiotherapy treatment units, the specialist in Radiation Oncology will be responsible for determining the correct treatment indication, selecting target volumes, determining the clinical radiation parameters for each volume, directing and supervising treatment, preparing the final clinical report, reporting treatment outcomes, and monitoring the patient's clinical course." Consequently, the SEOR and SEFM have jointly prepared the present document to establish the roles and responsibilities for the specialists—radiation oncologists (RO), medical physicists (MP), and related staff —involved in treatments with ionizing radiation. We believe that it is important to clearly establish the responsibilities of each professional group and to clearly establish the professional competencies at each stage of the radiotherapy process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Alexithymia and professional quality of life in radiation oncology: The moderator effect of the professional profile.
- Author
-
Franco, Pierfrancesco, Di Tella, Marialaura, Tesio, Valentina, Gasnier, Anne, Petit, Steven, Spalek, Mateusz, Bibault, Jean-Emmanuel, Dubois, Ludwig, Mullaney, Laura, Redalen, Kathrine Røe, Chargari, Cyrus, Perryck, Sophie, Bittner, Martin-Immanuel, Bertholet, Jenny, and Castelli, Lorys
- Subjects
- *
ALEXITHYMIA , *SECONDARY traumatic stress , *QUALITY of life , *RADIATION , *CHI-squared test , *PROFESSIONAL employees - Abstract
• Professional quality of life is crucial for radiation oncology professionals. • Alexithymia increases compassion fatigue and decreases compassion satisfaction. • Professional category impacts well-being at work. • Professional profile has a moderator role on secondary traumatic stress. • Teaching emotional awareness should be fostered. Cancer care can be taxing. Alexithymia, a personality construct characterized by difficulties in identifying and describing feeling and emotions, an externally-oriented thinking style and scarcity of imagination and fantasy, is significantly correlated with higher levels of both secondary traumatic stress (STS) and burnout and lower levels of compassion satisfaction in medical professionals in radiation oncology. In this study, we aimed to assess the difference in professional quality of life (QoL) and the association with alexithymia in this multidisciplinary field depending on the specific profession (radiation/clinical oncologist, RO; medical physicist, MP; radiation therapist, RTT). The study was conducted via an online questionnaire, receiving 1500 submissions between May and October 2018. Alexithymia was assessed via the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) and professional QoL was evaluated using the Professional Quality of Life Scale (ProQoL) version 5. Comparisons between the RO, RTT, and MP groups were performed by ANOVA or MANOVA, followed by Bonferroni corrected ANOVAs for continuous variables, and Pearson's chi-square test for categorical variables. The effect size was determined by calculating partial eta-squared (η2). Profession had a moderator role on the correlation between alexithymia and STS, with RO being at a higher risk than MP and RTT. Further, the results of this study demonstrate the relevant point prevalence of decreased well-being at work even for professional categories such as MP despite the more technical profile and reduced interaction with patients. This study demonstrates the importance of alexithymia as a factor contributing to decreased professional QoL amongst radiation oncology professionals. Alexithymic ROs are impacted to a higher extent compared to MPs and RTTs by the indirect exposure to patients suffering. It is worth addressing these observations in professional education, aiming to improve QoL for healthcare personnel. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. НЕОБХІДНІСТЬ ВПРОВАДЖЕННЯ СЕРТИФІКАЦІЇ МЕДИЧНИХ ФІЗИКІВ В УКРАЇНІ.
- Author
-
Асламова, Л. І., Куліч, Є. В., and Шмиглюк, Л. В.
- Subjects
- *
MAGNETIC resonance imaging , *SYSTEM integration , *MEDICAL personnel , *ULTRASONIC imaging , *PHYSICISTS , *MICROBUBBLE diagnosis - Abstract
Medical physics is a dynamic and constantly growing field of applied physics mainly directed towards the applications of physics principles to health care. Among the technological novations there is the optimization of image quality for magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound diagnostics, and computer tomography; development and use of high energy linear accelerators with sophisticated options for dose delivery; computerized treatment planning systems, record and verification systems; overall integration of computers into the routine clinical work. The key role of the me dical physicist is widely recognized to ensure the safe and effective use of modern equipment for medical exposure. Medical physicists are involved in four basic activities: clinical service, research, and development, teaching, and management/ administration. In addition, they should be familiar with the safety culture and promote this principle among the medical staff for the improvement of radiation safety, setting an example by their behaviour. This is no the best practice for the certification of medical physicists in international experience. The paper presents an attempt to analyse international standards and propose recommendations for the implementation of medical physicist’ certification in Ukraine. According to the authors, this will strongly influence on nation’s health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Expanding the medical physicist curricular and professional programme to include Artificial Intelligence.
- Author
-
Zanca, F., Hernandez-Giron, I., Avanzo, M., Guidi, G., Crijns, W., Diaz, O., Kagadis, G.C., Rampado, O., Lønne, P.I., Ken, S., Colgan, N., Zaidi, H., Zakaria, G.A., and Kortesniemi, M.
- Abstract
• We developed a Medical Physicists Curricular Program regarding AI. • It can be considered as a supplement to all sub-speciality curricula of EFOMP. • It is recommended to be utilised by national training and regulatory bodies. • It can also be implemented via the European School of Medical Physics Expert modules. To provide a guideline curriculum related to Artificial Intelligence (AI), for the education and training of European Medical Physicists (MPs). The proposed curriculum consists of two levels: Basic (introducing MPs to the pillars of knowledge, development and applications of AI, in the context of medical imaging and radiation therapy) and Advanced. Both are common to the subspecialties (diagnostic and interventional radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation oncology). The learning outcomes of the training are presented as knowledge, skills and competences (KSC approach). For the Basic section, KSCs were stratified in four subsections: (1) Medical imaging analysis and AI Basics; (2) Implementation of AI applications in clinical practice; (3) Big data and enterprise imaging, and (4) Quality, Regulatory and Ethical Issues of AI processes. For the Advanced section instead, a common block was proposed to be further elaborated by each subspecialty core curriculum. The learning outcomes were also translated into a syllabus of a more traditional format, including practical applications. This AI curriculum is the first attempt to create a guideline expanding the current educational framework for Medical Physicists in Europe. It should be considered as a document to top the sub-specialties' curriculums and adapted by national training and regulatory bodies. The proposed educational program can be implemented via the European School of Medical Physics Expert (ESMPE) course modules and – to some extent – also by the national competent EFOMP organizations, to reach widely the medical physicist community in Europe. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. Artificial Intelligence and the Medical Physicist: Welcome to the Machine.
- Author
-
Avanzo, Michele, Trianni, Annalisa, Botta, Francesca, Talamonti, Cinzia, Stasi, Michele, Iori, Mauro, Bianconi, Francesco, and Gallo, Salvatore
- Subjects
ARTIFICIAL intelligence ,PHYSICISTS ,MEDICAL physics ,COGNITIVE ability ,COMPUTER science - Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a branch of computer science dedicated to giving machines or computers the ability to perform human-like cognitive functions, such as learning, problem-solving, and decision making. Since it is showing superior performance than well-trained human beings in many areas, such as image classification, object detection, speech recognition, and decision-making, AI is expected to change profoundly every area of science, including healthcare and the clinical application of physics to healthcare, referred to as medical physics. As a result, the Italian Association of Medical Physics (AIFM) has created the "AI for Medical Physics" (AI4MP) group with the aims of coordinating the efforts, facilitating the communication, and sharing of the knowledge on AI of the medical physicists (MPs) in Italy. The purpose of this review is to summarize the main applications of AI in medical physics, describe the skills of the MPs in research and clinical applications of AI, and define the major challenges of AI in healthcare. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. MASTER'S PROGRAM IN MEDICAL PHYSICS IN ENGLISH.
- Author
-
DIMITROVA, Todorka L.
- Subjects
- *
MEDICAL physics , *IRRADIATION , *RADIOTHERAPY , *IONIZING radiation , *PHYSICISTS - Abstract
Medical Physics is an important field of contemporary scientific research, leading to innovative technologies with vast application in medicine. This raises the need for well-educated and trained specialists, as well continuous lifelong learning. In 2012 Medical Physics was recognized as a profession at international level, therefore European countries started to give more attention to the legislation concerning the medical application of ionizing radiation. This way more emphasis was given to Medical Radiation Physics, and it also reflected on educational programs. The number of master programs in Medical Physics increases worldwide. However, they differ not only in every country, but also in every university, depending on available equipment in medical centers, training of lecturers, and how adequately equipped student laboratories are. However, there is a need to define an obligatory set of disciplines by developing a professional profile based on competences. The common efforts of different national and international institutions are needed. The expected result is the modernization and synchronization of education and meeting hospital needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
22. Oh dear medical physicist and biomedical engineer, why it is difficult to pioneer your specialist career?
- Author
-
Medvedec, M., MAGJAREVIC, Ratko, Editor-in-chief, Ladyzynsk, Piotr, Series editor, Ibrahim, Fatimah, Series editor, Lacković, Igor, Series editor, Rock, Emilio Sacristan, Series editor, and Jaffray, David A., editor
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. IUPESM-HTTG Workshop on Radiological Equipment Maintenance Issues
- Author
-
Borrás, Caridad, Calil, Saide Jorge, David, Yadin, Pallikarakis, Nicolas E., Secca, Mario Forjaz, MAGJAREVIC, Ratko, Editor-in-chief, Ładyzynsk, Piotr, Series editor, Ibrahim, Fatimah, Series editor, Lacković, Igor, Series editor, Rock, Emilio Sacristan, Series editor, and Vasic, Darko, editor
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Is Remote Learning as Effective as In-Person Learning for Contouring Education? A Prospective Comparison of Face-to-Face versus Online Delivery of the Anatomy and Radiology Contouring Bootcamp
- Author
-
Vikram Velker, Andrew Warner, Katherine E. Willmore, Paige Eansor, Anthony C. Nichols, Nicole Campbell, Keng Yeow Tay, Glenn Bauman, Eric Leung, Zahra Kassam, Leah A. D'Souza, Manas Sharma, Madeleine E. Norris, and David A. Palma
- Subjects
Cancer Research ,Contouring ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Radiation ,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ,business.industry ,MEDLINE ,Remote learning ,Anatomy ,Knowledge acquisition ,Education, Distance ,Medical physicist ,Face-to-face ,Oncology ,Radiation oncology ,Radiation Oncology ,medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Prospective Studies ,Radiology ,business - Abstract
The Anatomy and Radiology Contouring (ARC) Bootcamp was a face-to-face (F2F) intervention providing integrated education for radiation oncology (RO) residents and medical physicists. To increase access, we launched an online offering in 2019. We evaluated the effect of the online course on participants' knowledge acquisition, contouring skills, and self-confidence by comparing it with the F2F course.Using modules, the online course offers content similar to that of the F2F comparator. Participants from the 2019 F2F and the 2019-2020 online course completed pre- and postevaluations assessing anatomy and radiology knowledge, contouring skills, self-confidence, and course satisfaction.There were 180 individuals enrolled (F2F: n = 40; online: n = 140); 57 participants (F2F: n = 30; online: n = 27) completed both evaluations. The online course had a wider geographic participation (19 countries) than F2F (4 countries). F2F had primarily RO resident participation (80%), compared with online (41%). Both cohorts demonstrated similar improvements in self-confidence pertaining to anatomy and radiology knowledge, contouring skills, and interpreting radiology images (all P.001). Both the online (mean ± SD improvement: 6.6 ± 6.7 on a 40-point scale; P.001) and F2F (3.7 ± 5.7; P = .002) groups showed anatomy and radiology knowledge improvement. Only the F2F group demonstrated improvement with the contouring assessment (F2F: 0.10 ± 0.17 on a 1-point Dice scale; P = .004; online: 0.07 ± 0.16; P = .076). Both cohorts perceived the course as a positive experience (F2F: 4.8 ± 0.4 on a 5-point scale; online: 4.5 ± 0.6), stated it would improve their professional practice (F2F: 4.6 ± 0.5; online: 4.2 ± 0.8), and said they would recommend it to others (F2F: 4.8 ± 0.4; online: 4.4 ± 0.6).The online ARC Bootcamp demonstrated improved self-confidence, knowledge scores, and high satisfaction levels among participants. The offering had lower completion rates but was more accessible to geographic regions, provided a flexible learning experience, and allowed for ongoing education during the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Published
- 2022
25. Artificial Intelligence and the Medical Physicist: Welcome to the Machine
- Author
-
Michele Avanzo, Annalisa Trianni, Francesca Botta, Cinzia Talamonti, Michele Stasi, and Mauro Iori
- Subjects
artificial intelligence ,deep learning ,medical physicist ,machine learning ,big data ,Technology ,Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) ,TA1-2040 ,Biology (General) ,QH301-705.5 ,Physics ,QC1-999 ,Chemistry ,QD1-999 - Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a branch of computer science dedicated to giving machines or computers the ability to perform human-like cognitive functions, such as learning, problem-solving, and decision making. Since it is showing superior performance than well-trained human beings in many areas, such as image classification, object detection, speech recognition, and decision-making, AI is expected to change profoundly every area of science, including healthcare and the clinical application of physics to healthcare, referred to as medical physics. As a result, the Italian Association of Medical Physics (AIFM) has created the “AI for Medical Physics” (AI4MP) group with the aims of coordinating the efforts, facilitating the communication, and sharing of the knowledge on AI of the medical physicists (MPs) in Italy. The purpose of this review is to summarize the main applications of AI in medical physics, describe the skills of the MPs in research and clinical applications of AI, and define the major challenges of AI in healthcare.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Dr. Edith H. Quimby: A pioneering medical physicist and educator with outstanding contributions in radiation dosimetry
- Author
-
Nicolas A. Karakatsanis and Elizabeth Kagan Arleo
- Subjects
Medical physicist ,medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Humans ,Dosimetry ,Medicine ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Medical physics ,Radiology ,Radiometry ,business - Published
- 2022
27. The international context of education, training and certification for medical physicists in Europe, North America and Australasia
- Author
-
Geoghegan, D. S., Stefanoyiannis, A. P., Christofides, S., Psichis, K., Gerogiannis, I., Round, W. H., Geronikola-Trapali, X., Armeniakos, I., Kaplanis, P. A., Prentakis, A., Chatziioannou, S. N., and Long, Mian, editor
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. Assessment of Radiation Oncology Medical Physics Residents: The London, Ontario (Canada) Experience
- Author
-
Van Dyk, Jacob, Battista, Jerry J., Hibbert, Kathryn M., editor, Chhem, Rethy K., editor, van Deven, Teresa, editor, and Wang, Shih-chang, editor
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Clinical Training in Medical Physics: IAEA Perspective
- Author
-
Meghzifene, Ahmed, Mclean, Donald, Van Der Merwe, Debbie, Thomas, Brian, Hibbert, Kathryn M., editor, Chhem, Rethy K., editor, van Deven, Teresa, editor, and Wang, Shih-chang, editor
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. Metallic Nanoparticles: A Useful Prompt Gamma Emitter for Range Monitoring in Proton Therapy?
- Author
-
Julien L. Colaux, Félicien Hespeels, Sébastien Penninckx, Anne-Catherine Heuskin, Stéphane Lucas, and Julien Smeets
- Subjects
Dose delivery ,Range (particle radiation) ,radiosensitizer ,Materials science ,R895-920 ,Planning target volume ,General Medicine ,prompt gamma ,nanoparticles ,proton therapy ,radioenhancer ,Medical physicist ,Medical physics. Medical radiology. Nuclear medicine ,Metal nanoparticles ,Proton therapy ,Beam (structure) ,Biomedical engineering ,Common emitter - Abstract
In clinical practice, dose delivery in proton therapy treatment is affected by uncertainties related to the range of the beam in the patient, which requires medical physicists to introduce safety margins on the penetration depth of the beam. Although this ensures an irradiation of the entire clinical target volume with the prescribed dose, these safety margins also lead to the exposure of nearby healthy tissues and a subsequent risk of side effects. Therefore, non-invasive techniques that allow for margin reduction through online monitoring of prompt gammas emitted along the proton tracks in the patient are currently under development. This study provides the proof-of-concept of metal-based nanoparticles, injected into the tumor, as a prompt gamma enhancer, helping in the beam range verification. It identifies the limitations of this application, suggesting a low feasibility in a realistic clinical scenario but opens some avenues for improvement.
- Published
- 2021
31. Professional Abbreviations in Medical Radiology, Medical Physics and Radiation Safety
- Subjects
Medical physicist ,medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Radiological weapon ,Professional development ,medicine ,Medical physics ,business - Abstract
A dictionary of abbreviations (abbreviations), most often used in scientific publications, methodological recommendations, regulatory documents on the medical use of sources of ionizing radiation, has been developed. The dictionary contains abbreviations in English, which are usually not deciphered in English-language publications, as well as abbreviations in Russian with the reduction, if possible, of the corresponding English abbreviations. The dictionary is intended for use both in professional education, including postgraduate education, and to facilitate the interaction of medical physicists, radiologists, radiologists and radiation oncologists working in radiological and oncological medical organizations.
- Published
- 2021
32. Remote Computational Tools for Radiotherapy Cancer Treatment Planning
- Author
-
Andrés Gómez on behalf of the members of the Business Experiment, Stanoevska-Slabeva, Katarina, editor, Wozniak, Thomas, editor, and Ristol, Santi, editor
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. EFOMP policy statement 16: The role and competences of medical physicists and medical physics experts under 2013/59/EURATOM.
- Author
-
Caruana, Carmel J., Tsapaki, Virginia, Damilakis, John, Brambilla, Marco, Martín, Guadalupe Martín, Dimov, Asen, Bosmans, Hilde, Egan, Gillian, Bacher, Klaus, and McClean, Brendan
- Abstract
On 5 December 2013 the European Council promulgated Directive 2013/59/EURATOM. This Directive is important for Medical Physicists and Medical Physics Experts as it puts the profession on solid foundations and describes it more comprehensively. Much commentary regarding the role and competences has been developed in the context of the European Commission project “European Guidelines on the Medical Physics Expert” published as Radiation Protection Report RP174. The guidelines elaborate on the role and responsibilities under 2013/59/EURATOM in terms of a mission statement and competence profile in the specialty areas of Medical Physics relating to medical radiological services, namely Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine. The present policy statement summarises the provisions of Directive 2013/59/EURATOM regarding the role and competences, reiterates the results of the European Guidelines on the Medical Physics Expert document relating to role and competences of the profession and provides additional commentary regarding further issues arising following the publication of the RP174 guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. Education and Training of Medical Physicists in Europe and the Countries of North America: Similarities-Differences-General Guidelines
- Author
-
Stefanoyiannis, A. P., Psichis, C., Gerogiannis, I., Christofides, S., Kaplanis, P. A., Geronikola-Trapali, X., Chatziioannou, S. N., Armeniakos, I., Prentakis, A., Magjarevic, Ratko, editor, Dössel, Olaf, editor, and Schlegel, Wolfgang C., editor
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. WHY MEASUREMENT OF RADIATION DOSE BY MEDICAL PHYSICIST AND RADIATION ONCOLOGIST BOTH?
- Author
-
Kumar Dev, Baig M.Q, and Rubina Rubina
- Subjects
Medical physicist ,medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Radiation dose ,Medicine ,Medical physics ,business ,Radiation oncologist - Abstract
Many years after the discovery of X-ray's and gamma rays. They have been used empirically in medicine, later on realized that this approach was dangerous mainly in radiotherapy and up to some extent in diagnostic radiology. Thus Means of measuring x-ray/γ-rays had to be found in terms of unit of x-rays quantity dened and accepted. The magnitude of the biological effect desirable in case therapy and undesirable in case of diagnosis. It depends upon how much radiation energy is absorbed by irradiated material. X-ray dosimetry is the measurement of energy absorbed in any material particularly in different tissues of the body.
- Published
- 2021
36. Residency training for diagnostic imaging physicists should be expanded to include nuclear medicine physics
- Author
-
Brad K. Lofton, Gerald A. White, and Frederic H. Fahey
- Subjects
Certification ,Modalities ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Specialty ,Internship and Residency ,Computed tomography ,General Medicine ,United States ,Radiography ,Medical physicist ,Radiological weapon ,Medical imaging ,medicine ,Humans ,Nuclear Medicine ,Nuclear medicine ,business ,Health Physics ,Residency training ,Nuclear Physics - Abstract
The American Board of Radiology offers certification in three specialties of medical physics: Therapeutic Medical Physics, Diagnostic Medical Physics, and Nuclear Medical Physics. Of these specialties, medical nuclear physics has the fewest active diplomates, only a few hundred. The diagnostic medical physics specialty certification incudes a variety of modalities (ultrasound, radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging) yet does not address nuclear medicine imaging or therapy. This separation dates to the beginning of the ABR certification process for medical physicists in 1947; originally there were three certificates available: X-ray and Radium Physics, Medical Nuclear Physics and, as combination of these two, Radiological Physics. Over the span of 75 years since the Medical Nuclear Physics certification was created, much has changed in the scope and proliferation of the nuclear medicine endeavor and the question arises as to the need for change in the preparation process for medical physicists in the field. I offer thanks to our contributors and note that they are writing in the classic style of a debate, the opinions that they argue may or may not reflect their personal views.
- Published
- 2021
37. Hypofractionated radiotherapy recommendations for localized prostate cancer in Brazil
- Author
-
Anderson Pássaro, Pedro Henrique da Rocha Zanuncio, Rodrigo de Morais Hanriot, Marcus S Castilho, Felipe Quintino Kuhnen, Icaro Thiago de Carvalho, João Luis Fernandes da Silva, Fábio de Lima Costa Faustino, L Pimentel, Fernando Mariano Obst, Márcio Lemberg Reisner, Lisa Karina Kokay Morikawa, Flávio Napoleão Buarque Barbosa Ferro Costa, Daniel Moore Freitas Palhares, Elton Trigo Teixeira Leite, Giovani Thomaz Pioner, Arthur Accioly Rosa, and Andrea Barleze Costa
- Subjects
Male ,Hypofractionated Radiotherapy ,Conventional fractionation ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Medicine (General) ,Consensus ,medicine.medical_treatment ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,law.invention ,Medical physicist ,03 medical and health sciences ,Prostate cancer ,0302 clinical medicine ,R5-920 ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,medicine ,Humans ,Medical physics ,Prospective Studies ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Radiotherapy ,business.industry ,General Medicine ,medicine.disease ,Radiation dose hypofractionation ,Radiation therapy ,Treatment Outcome ,Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated ,Prostatic neoplasms ,business ,Brazil - Abstract
SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: Several prospective randomized trials have shown that hypofractionation has the same efficacy and safety as the conventional fractionation in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. There are many benefits of hypofractionation, including a more convenient schedule for the patients and better use of resources, which is especially important in low- and middle-income countries like Brasil. Based on these data, the Brazilian Society of Radiotherapy (Sociedade Brasileira de Radioterapia) organized this consensus to guide and support the use of hypofractionated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer in Brasil. METHODS: The relevant literature regarding moderate hypofractionation (mHypo) and ultra-hypofractionation (uHypo) was reviewed and discussed by a group of experts from public and private centers of different parts of Brasil. Several key questions concerning clinical indications, outcomes and technological requirements for hypofractionation were discussed and voted. For each question, consensus was reached if there was an agreement of at least 75% of the panel members. RESULTS: The recommendations are described in this article. CONCLUSION: This initiative will assist Brazilian radiation oncologists and medical physicists to safely treat localized prostate cancer patients with hypofractionation.
- Published
- 2021
38. Studies of the Integration of Education/Training of Medical Physicists with that of Radiological Technologists
- Author
-
Inamura, Kiyonari, Matsumoto, Masao, and Long, Mian, editor
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
39. First clinical implementation of GammaTile permanent brain implants after FDA clearance
- Author
-
David Sterling, Parham Alaei, Kathryn E. Dusenbery, Clara Ferreira, Margaret A Reynolds, and Clark C. Chen
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Brachytherapy ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,Medical physicist ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Dosimetry ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Medical physics ,Radiometry ,Radiation treatment planning ,Radiation oncologist ,United States Food and Drug Administration ,business.industry ,Brain ,Radiotherapy Dosage ,United States ,Clinical trial ,Brain implant ,Oncology ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Neurosurgery ,business - Abstract
Purpose GammaTile cesium-131 (131Cs) permanent brain implant has received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clearance as a promising treatment for certain brain tumors. Our center was the first institution in the United States after FDA clearance to offer the clinical use of GammaTile brachytherapy outside of a clinical trial. The purpose of this work is to aid the medical physicist and radiation oncologist in implementing this collagen carrier tile brachytherapy (CTBT) program in their practice. Methods A total of 23 patients have been treated with GammaTile to date at our center. Treatment planning system (TPS) commissioning was performed by configuring the parameters for the 131Cs (IsoRay Model CS-1, Rev2) source, and doses were validated with the consensus data from the American Association of Physicists in Medicine TG-43U1S2. Implant procedures, dosimetry, postimplant planning, and target delineations were established based on our clinical experience. Radiation safety aspects were evaluated based on exposure rate measurements of implanted patients, as well as body and ring badge measurements. Results An estimated timeframe of the GammaTile clinical responsibilities for the medical physicist, radiation oncologist, and neurosurgeon is presented. TPS doses were validated with published dose to water for 131Cs. Clinical aspects, including estimation of the number of tiles, treatment planning, dosimetry, and radiation safety considerations, are presented. Conclusion The implementation of the GammaTile program requires collaboration from multiple specialties, including medical physics, radiation oncology, and neurosurgery. This manuscript provides a roadmap for the implementation of this therapy.
- Published
- 2021
40. The status of medical physics in radiotherapy in China
- Author
-
Ye Zhang, Zhihui Hu, Yexiong Li, Hui Yan, Peng Huang, Lvhua Wang, Kuo Men, Jianrong Dai, and Yi-Min Hu
- Subjects
China ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Population ,Biophysics ,General Physics and Astronomy ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,Medical physicist ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Political science ,Radiation oncology ,medicine ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Medical physics ,education ,education.field_of_study ,Radiotherapy ,Continuing education ,General Medicine ,Chinese society ,Radiation therapy ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Radiation Oncology ,Professional association ,Health Physics - Abstract
Purpose To present an overview of the status of medical physics in radiotherapy in China, including facilities and devices, occupation, education, research, etc. Materials and methods The information about medical physics in clinics was obtained from the 9-th nationwide survey conducted by the China Society for Radiation Oncology in 2019. The data of medical physics in education and research was collected from the publications of the official and professional organizations. Results By 2019, there were 1463 hospitals or institutes registered to practice radiotherapy and the number of accelerators per million population was 1.5. There were 4172 medical physicists working in clinics of radiation oncology. The ratio between the numbers of radiation oncologists and medical physicists is 3.51. Approximately, 95% of medical physicists have an undergraduate or graduate degrees in nuclear physics and biomedical engineering. 86% of medical physicists have certificates issued by the Chinese Society of Medical Physics. There has been a fast growth of publications by authors from mainland of China in the top international medical physics and radiotherapy journals since 2018. Conclusions Demand for medical physicists in radiotherapy increased quickly in the past decade. The distribution of radiotherapy facilities in China became more balanced. High quality continuing education and training programs for medical physicists are deficient in most areas. The role of medical physicists in the clinic has not been clearly defined and their contributions have not been fully recognized by the community.
- Published
- 2021
41. Description of the methodology for dosimetric quantification in treatments with 177Lu-DOTATATE
- Author
-
A. Gómez de Iturriaga Piña, M.Á. Peinado Montes, M.L. Domínguez Grande, T. Monserrat Fuertes, P. Mínguez Gabiña, F.M. González García, and N. Martín Fernández
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,General Engineering ,Internal radiation ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,Medical physicist ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Homogeneous ,Absorbed dose ,177Lu-DOTATATE ,General Earth and Planetary Sciences ,Dosimetry ,Medicine ,Medical physics ,Resource consumption ,business ,In vivo dosimetry ,General Environmental Science - Abstract
Implementation of dosimetry calculations in the daily practice of Nuclear Medicine Departments is, at this time, a controversial issue, partly due to the lack of a standardized methodology that is accepted by all interested parties (patients, nuclear medicine physicians and medical physicists). However, since the publication of RD 601/2019 there is a legal obligation to implement it, despite the fact that it is a complex and high resource consumption procedure. The aim of this article is to review the theoretical bases of in vivo dosimetry in treatments with 177Lu-DOTATATE. The exposed methodology is the one proposed by the MIRD Committee (Medical Internal Radiation Dose) of the SNMMI (Society of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging). According to this method, the absorbed dose is obtained as the product of 2 factors: the time-integrated activity of the radiopharmaceutical present in a source region and a geometrical factor S. This approach, which a priori seems simple, in practice requires several SPECT/CT acquisitions, several measurements of the whole body activity and taking several blood samples, as well as hours of image processing and computation. The systematic implementation of these calculations, in all the patients we treat, will allow us to obtain homogeneous data to correlate the absorbed doses in the lesions with the biological effect of the treatment. The final purpose of the dosimetry calculations is to be able to maximize the therapeutic effect in the lesions, controlling the radiotoxicity in the organs at risk.
- Published
- 2021
42. ANALISIS PENERAPAN KESELAMATAN RADIASI SINAR-X PADA PETUGAS RADIASI DI INSTALASI RADIOLOGI RUMAH SAKIT PEKANBARU MEDICAL CENTER (PMC)
- Author
-
Masribut Masribut, Firman Edigan, Rennyta Monita, Zulmeliza Rasyid, and Muhamadiah Muhamadiah
- Subjects
Officer ,Medical physicist ,Work (electrical) ,business.industry ,Qualitative descriptive ,medicine ,General Medicine ,Medical emergency ,Radiation protection ,business ,Observation data ,medicine.disease - Abstract
Keselamatan radiasi adalah tindakan yang dilakukan untuk melindungi pasien, pekerja, masyarakat, dan lingkungan hidup dari bahaya radiasi. Mengingat potensi bahaya radiasi yang besar dalam pemanfaatan sinar-X, faktor keselamatan merupakan hal yang penting sehingga dapat memperkecil risiko akibat kerja di instalasi radiologi dan dampak radiasi terhadap pekerja radiasi. Jenis penelitian ini menggunakan metode diskriptif kualitatif dengan teknik pengambilan data observasi, wawancara, dan studi dokumentasi. Informan dalam penelitian ini berjumlah 6 orang diantaranya: satu kepala ruangan instalasi radiologi, dua radiografer, satu petugas proteksi radiasi, satu fisikawan medis, dan satu petugas K3 Rumah Sakit. Uji keabsahan data menggunakan teknik triangulasi sumber dan triangulasi teknik. Hasil analisis dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa penerapan keselamatan radiasi belum dilakukan secara keseluruhan, dimana terdapat aspek yang tidak memenuhi standar peraturan BAPETEN seperti tidak dilakukannya pemantaun kesehatan sesuai ketetapan peraturan, tidak adanya pelatihan proteksi radiasi, kurangnya alat proteksi radiasi, tidak adanya surveymeter, kurang lengkapnya rekaman pelaksanaan kegiatan dan tidak adanya uji paparan potensial. Saran yang direkomendasikan adalah dilakukannya pemantauan kesehatan secara menyeluruh, diadakannya pelatihan proteksi radiasi bagi pekerja, penambahan alat proteksi radiasi, pengadaan surveymeter dan melengkapi rekaman pelaksanaan kegiatan di instalasi radiologi. Kata Kunci : Keselamatan, Radiasi Sinar-X, Radiologi, Rumah Sakit
- Published
- 2021
43. MPLA Case 1: Implementing Cone‐Beam CT in a Community Hospital
- Author
-
Dongxu Wang, Mary Gronberg, William Ellet, Leo A. Kim, Gabbie Meis, Jennifer L. Johnson, and Cassandra Stambaugh
- Subjects
leadership ,Medical education ,Radiation ,Scope (project management) ,Hospitals, Community ,Sample (statistics) ,Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ,Session (web analytics) ,Community hospital ,Education ,Medical physicist ,case study ,Action (philosophy) ,Facilitator ,MPLA ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Psychology ,Instrumentation ,Cone beam ct - Abstract
This fictional case describes a managerial situation of implementing cone‐beam computed tomography faced by a solo medical physicist in a rural community hospital. The intended use of the case study, in either a facilitated learning session or self‐study, is to inspire the readers to discuss the situation, analyze the institutional and personal factors, apply relevant leadership skills, and propose action plans. This case study falls under the scope of, and is supported by, the Medical Physics Leadership Academy (MPLA). A sample facilitator’s guide or self‐study guide is included in the manuscript for reference by users of this case study.
- Published
- 2021
44. Basic of machine learning and deep learning in imaging for medical physicists
- Author
-
Luca Bottazzi, N. Maffei, Lidia Strigari, Luigi Manco, S. Strolin, and Sara Vichi
- Subjects
Diagnostic Imaging ,Information retrieval ,Query string ,business.industry ,Computer science ,Deep learning ,Biophysics ,General Physics and Astronomy ,General Medicine ,Automation ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,Machine Learning ,Clinical Practice ,Medical physicist ,03 medical and health sciences ,Deep Learning ,0302 clinical medicine ,Artificial Intelligence ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Artificial intelligence ,business ,Algorithms - Abstract
The manuscript aims at providing an overview of the published algorithms/automation tool for artificial intelligence applied to imaging for Healthcare. A PubMed search was performed using the query string to identify the proposed approaches (algorithms/automation tools) for artificial intelligence (machine and deep learning) in a 5-year period. The distribution of manuscript in the various disciplines and the investigated image types according to the AI approaches are presented. The limitation and opportunity of AI application in the clinical practice or in the next future research is discussed.
- Published
- 2021
45. Accelerated Education Program in Radiation Medicine: International Learner Perceptions of Experiences, Outcomes, and Impact
- Author
-
Nicole Harnett, Rebecca Wong, Emma Ito, Fei-Fei Liu, Sarah Tosoni, Colin Brandt, and Emily Milne
- Subjects
Cancer Research ,Internationality ,Attitude of Health Personnel ,media_common.quotation_subject ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,Medical physicist ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Continuing medical education ,Learner perceptions ,Humans ,Learning ,Medicine ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Quality (business) ,Qualitative Research ,media_common ,Ontario ,Medical education ,Radiation ,business.industry ,Radiation Therapist ,Behavior change ,Radiation Oncologists ,Oncology ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Radiation Oncology ,Education, Medical, Continuing ,Thematic analysis ,business ,Staff training - Abstract
Purpose The Accelerated Education Program (AEP) at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (PM) has been offering continuing medical education courses since 2006. The purpose of this study was to assess learner experiences, perspectives, and outcomes using Kirkpatrick’s Four Level Training Evaluation Model (ie, reaction, learning, behavior, results) to ascertain whether it was meeting stated goals. Methods and Materials Past course participants (2010-2018) were invited to participate in a semistructured interview. Interviews were transcribed verbatim; thematic analysis was conducted by a 4-person research team. Results Seventeen participants including 2 medical physicists, 6 radiation oncologists, and 9 radiation therapists from 6 countries on 4 continents participated in the study. Interviews lasted an average of 25 minutes. Consistently positive outcomes were reported at each level of Kirkpatrick’s model. At the reaction level, participants liked the small, interactive case-based design, exposure to renowned faculty and practices from PM and other major centers, and the interprofessional practice (IPP) approach. Suggestions for improvements include enhancing practical content. At the learning level, participants reported gaining new knowledge or skills and new awareness or attitudes. Behavior changes described included sharing learnings with colleagues, implementing changes in practice or techniques, departmental structure, and IPP. Participants described the effects on clinical practice (results) in quality of care, access to care, and academic contribution. Identified barriers to change related to the restricted internal capacity for change and the need for wider staff training. Conclusions AEP courses were found to have a positive effect on local practices ranging from confirmation of current practice through to increased access to and quality of advanced radiotherapeutic techniques and care. Our findings confirm that AEP is achieving its goal of “putting innovation to work” and suggest curricular improvements that can enhance these effects.
- Published
- 2021
46. Perceptions of Canadian radiation oncologists, radiation physicists, radiation therapists and radiation trainees about the impact of artificial intelligence in radiation oncology – national survey
- Author
-
Kristen Wong, Francois Gallant, and Ewa Szumacher
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Further education ,Canada ,Attitude of Health Personnel ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Allied Health Personnel ,Specialty ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,Medical physicist ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Artificial Intelligence ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Perception ,Radiation oncology ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Patient treatment ,Aged ,media_common ,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology ,Descriptive statistics ,Radiation Therapist ,business.industry ,Radiation Oncologists ,Middle Aged ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Radiation Oncology ,Female ,Artificial intelligence ,Psychology ,business - Abstract
Background Artificial Intelligence (AI) is making a continuous progression into the field of Radiation Oncology in Canada and globally. While this field continues to evolve, there is no clear understanding about how radiation oncologists, radiation therapists, medical physicists and radiation trainees perceive AI and its’ impact on radiation oncology as a discipline. The purpose of this study was to investigate the perception of these four Canadian professional groups about AI. and how AI will affect radiation oncology as a specialty. Methods Following an in-depth scientific review of the existing literature, a 29 Likert-scale questionnaire was developed using Google Survey. The questionnaire was piloted and distributed through national organizations including the Canadian Association for Radiation Oncology (CARO), the Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Therapy (CAMRT) and the Canadian Organization of Medical Physicists (COMP), initially in February, and again between March and June 2020. The results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results 159 responses were received from 10 Canadian provinces. Knowledge about AI was moderate with an average of 5/10, but 91% responded interest in learning more about it. The negative implications of AI were related to fear of losing jobs and shift of practice. The majority of participants agreed AI would positively impact on patient treatment. Conclusion Radiation oncology professionals believe AI will be an important part of patient treatment in their future practices. The fear about AI may be mitigated with further education programs about AI, which can gain more confidence in the acceptance of AI.
- Published
- 2021
47. Expanding the medical physicist curricular and professional programme to include Artificial Intelligence
- Author
-
P.I. Lønne, S. Ken, Mika Kortesniemi, Gabriele Guidi, Federica Zanca, Osvaldo Rampado, Habib Zaidi, Oliver Diaz, W. Crijns, G.A. Zakaria, I. Hernandez-Giron, George C. Kagadis, Niall Colgan, Michele Avanzo, HUS Medical Imaging Center, Department of Diagnostics and Therapeutics, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital Area
- Subjects
Artificial intelligence ,Engineering ,Big data ,Biophysics ,General Physics and Astronomy ,Context (language use) ,Subspecialty ,ddc:616.0757 ,RECOMMENDATIONS ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,Syllabus ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,EFOMP ,Medical physicist ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Continuing professional development (CPD) ,Curriculum ,business.industry ,4. Education ,Education and training ,EDUCATION ,General Medicine ,Guideline ,3126 Surgery, anesthesiology, intensive care, radiology ,3. Good health ,Europe ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Applications of artificial intelligence ,Nuclear Medicine ,business ,Educational program ,Health Physics - Abstract
Purpose To provide a guideline curriculum related to Artificial Intelligence (AI), for the education and training of European Medical Physicists (MPs). Materials and methods The proposed curriculum consists of two levels: Basic (introducing MPs to the pillars of knowledge, development and applications of AI, in the context of medical imaging and radiation therapy) and Advanced. Both are common to the subspecialties (diagnostic and interventional radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation oncology). The learning outcomes of the training are presented as knowledge, skills and competences (KSC approach). Results For the Basic section, KSCs were stratified in four subsections: (1) Medical imaging analysis and AI Basics; (2) Implementation of AI applications in clinical practice; (3) Big data and enterprise imaging, and (4) Quality, Regulatory and Ethical Issues of AI processes. For the Advanced section instead, a common block was proposed to be further elaborated by each subspecialty core curriculum. The learning outcomes were also translated into a syllabus of a more traditional format, including practical applications. Conclusions This AI curriculum is the first attempt to create a guideline expanding the current educational framework for Medical Physicists in Europe. It should be considered as a document to top the sub-specialties’ curriculums and adapted by national training and regulatory bodies. The proposed educational program can be implemented via the European School of Medical Physics Expert (ESMPE) course modules and – to some extent – also by the national competent EFOMP organizations, to reach widely the medical physicist community in Europe.
- Published
- 2021
48. A diagnostic medical physicist’s guide to the American College of Radiology Fluoroscopy Dose Index Registry
- Author
-
Kay Zacharias-Andrews, Kevin Wunderle, Alan H. Schoenfeld, Usman Mahmood, Shalmali Dharmadhikari, Xinhui Duan, A. Kyle Jones, Steve D. Mann, Rebecca A. Neill, Don Soo Kim, Jeffrey M. Moirano, Michael Simanowith, and Dustin A. Gress
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Radiation ,Index (economics) ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,MEDLINE ,Review Article ,Fluoroscopy dose ,Radiation Dosage ,United States ,Medical physicist ,Fluoroscopy ,medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Radiology ,Registries ,business ,Instrumentation - Published
- 2021
49. Considerations when introducing MRI into a radiation therapy environment
- Author
-
John Baines and Bronwyn Shirley
- Subjects
3d printed ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,Computer science ,Radiation Therapist ,Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted ,Radiation field ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Editorials ,R895-920 ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Linear particle accelerator ,Medical radiation ,Medical physicist ,Radiation therapy ,Medical physics. Medical radiology. Nuclear medicine ,Editorial ,Radiation Oncology ,medicine ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Medical physics ,Particle Accelerators - Abstract
This issue of Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences includes two papers presenting different uses of magnetic resonance (MR) in radiation therapy (RT). With the advancement of MR-simulators and Magnetic resonance linear accelerators (MRL), in addition to the use of diagnostic MR becoming more common place in the radiotherapy setting, there are a number of challenges to be considered. In this article, we present the perspectives of radiation therapists and medical physicists involved in the commissioning of an MRL in our centre. Image shows in-house 3D printed supports mounted on the vendor-supplied QA platform. The supports locate an array so that it is centred in the radiation field.
- Published
- 2021
50. Recommended procedures and responsibilities for radiosurgery (SRS) and extracranial stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT): report of the SEOR in collaboration with the SEFM
- Author
-
M.J. Pérez-Calatayud, C. Rubio Rodriguez, Antonio Gómez-Caamaño, J Contreras Martínez, F. J. Celada Álvarez, D. Zucca Aparicio, P. Fernandez-Leton, Fernando López-Campos, and Antonio J. Conde-Moreno
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,General Medicine ,Radiosurgery ,Medical physicist ,Radiation therapy ,03 medical and health sciences ,030104 developmental biology ,0302 clinical medicine ,Oncology ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Radiological weapon ,Radiation oncology ,medicine ,Medical physics ,business ,Stereotactic body radiotherapy ,Professional group ,Royal decree - Abstract
Today, patient management generally requires a multidisciplinary approach. However, due to the growing knowledge base and increasing complexity of Medicine, clinical practice has become even more specialised. Radiation oncology is not immune to this trend towards subspecialisation, which is particularly evident in ablative radiotherapy techniques that require high dose fractions, such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The aim of the present report is to establish the position of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR), in collaboration with the Spanish Society of Medical Physics (SEFM), with regard to the roles and responsibilities of healthcare professionals involved in performing SRS and SBRT. The need for this white paper is motivated due to the recent changes in Spanish Legislation (Royal Decree [RD] 601/2019, October 18, 2019) governing the use and optimization of radiotherapy and radiological protection for medical exposure to ionizing radiation (article 11, points 4 and 5) [1 ], which states: “In radiotherapy treatment units, the specialist in Radiation Oncology will be responsible for determining the correct treatment indication, selecting target volumes, determining the clinical radiation parameters for each volume, directing and supervising treatment, preparing the final clinical report, reporting treatment outcomes, and monitoring the patient’s clinical course.” Consequently, the SEOR and SEFM have jointly prepared the present document to establish the roles and responsibilities for the specialists—radiation oncologists (RO), medical physicists (MP), and related staff —involved in treatments with ionizing radiation. We believe that it is important to clearly establish the responsibilities of each professional group and to clearly establish the professional competencies at each stage of the radiotherapy process.
- Published
- 2021
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.