1. Ineffectiveness of Skin Tests in Predicting Allergic Reactions Induced by Chinese Herbal Injections
- Author
-
Baohe Wang, Chang-Xiao Liu, Chun-Xiao Lyu, Yanfen Li, Boli Zhang, Yuhong Huang, and Junhua Zhang
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Allergy ,integumentary system ,Meglumine ,business.industry ,Provocation test ,Healthy subjects ,General Medicine ,Gold standard (test) ,medicine.disease ,Dermatology ,Complementary and alternative medicine ,Medicine public health ,medicine ,Intradermal test ,Pharmacology (medical) ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
To evaluate whether skin tests are suitable to predict the allergy reactions induced by Chinese herbal injections (CHIs). The skin tests including skin prick tests (SPT), intradermal tests (IDT) and provocation tests including subcutaneous tests and intravenous tests were administered to 249 healthy subjects and 180 allergic patients for 3 CHIs, including ginkgolide injection, diterpene ginkgolide meglumine injection and Salvianolate lyophilized injection. The results of the provocation tests were used as the “gold standard” to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the skin tests. The results did not show any significant differences between the healthy and allergy groups in both skin tests and provocation tests (P>0.05). The specificities of SPT and IDT were 0.976 and 0.797, respectively, and the sensitivities of both SPT and IDT were 0. Skin tests are insufficient to predict the likelihood of allergic reactions resulting from CHIs. (ChiCTR-CPC-15006921)
- Published
- 2021