Search

Background Rapid changes in the healthcare marketplace are driving healthcare systems to modify operations by which advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) and physician assistants (PAs) serve patients. By identifying more effective and efficient utilization workflows, organizations can meet these demands, resulting in high-functioning clinical teams. Local problem With the growing number of APRNs and PAs in a large academic medical center, there was a recognized need to establish effective and efficient utilization practices for these healthcare providers. Methods Directors of the APP Best Practice Center developed an internal NP/certified nurse midwife (CNM)/clinical nurse specialist (CNS)/PA assessment service which conducted evaluations to optimize APRN and PA practice at the clinical/department level. This assessment excluded certified registered nurse anesthetists. Interventions Thirty-two clinical areas were evaluated between September 2016 and May 2019. This included an NP/CNM/CNS/PA survey and more than 200 individual NP/CNM/CNS/PA interviews. Assessments addressed utilization, billing practices, professional development, and communication among team members. Results Qualitative and quantitative reports were compiled. Many common themes were identified. These were broken down into three major categories: productivity, clinical operations, and professional development/support. Conclusions Several recommendations were presented to department leaders about NP/CNM/CNS/PA practice. Departments that implemented several of the recommendations showed positive outcomes. This was evidenced by increased financial gain (increased relative value units, increase in revenue generated), increased patient access (increased clinic densities), and overall NP/CNM/CNS/PA satisfaction.

Background Rapid changes in the health care marketplace are driving health care systems to modify operations by which the advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) and physician assistant (PA) clinicians serve patients. By identifying more effective and efficient utilization workflows, organizations can meet these demands resulting in high-functioning clinical teams. Local problem With the growing number of APRNs and PAs within a large academic medical center, there was a recognized need to establish effective and efficient utilization practices for these health care providers. Methods Directors of the Advanced Practice Provider Best Practice Center developed an internal nurse practitioner (NP)/certified nurse midwife (CNM)/clinical nurse specialist (CNS)/PA assessment service in which evaluations were conducted to optimize APRN and PA practice at the clinical/department level. This assessment excluded certified registered nurse anesthetists. Interventions Thirty-two clinical areas were evaluated between September 2016 and May 2019. This included an NP/CNM/CNS/PA survey and over 200 individual NP/CNM/CNS and PA provider interviews. Assessments addressed utilization, billing practices, professional development, and communication among team members. Results Qualitative and quantitative reports were compiled. Many common themes were identified. These were broken down into three major categories: productivity, clinical operations, and professional development/support. Conclusions Several recommendations were presented to department leaders regarding NP/CNM/CNS/PA practice. Those departments who implemented several of the recommendations showed positive outcomes. This was evidenced by increased financial gain (increased relative value units, increase in revenue generated), increased patient access (increased clinic densities), and overall NP/CNM/CNS/PA satisfaction.

Rapid changes in healthcare are driving the adjustment of work flow by which providers serve patients in team-based care. Specifically, there is a need to develop more effective and efficient utilization with accurate attribution of advanced practice providers' (APPs) productivity.The directors of the APP-Best Practice Center conducted assessments of each clinical area at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) Health, a large academic medical center. A knowledge gap was identified, not only regarding billing practices of the APPs (NPs and physician assistants) but also in the use of APPs to practice to the fullest extent of their license, education, and experience.By substantiating APPs' contribution margin through the process of implementing a new standardized APP billing algorithm, a change in practice was accepted by senior leadership and a new APP billing algorithm was built that follows updated practice laws, compliance/legal standards, and hospital bylaws and regulations.A new billing algorithm was implemented on July 1, 2017, and outcomes were evaluated 12 months after implementation.This project uncovered the work already performed by APPs while increasing relative value units, collections, and overall patient encounters by the APP/physician team. Findings suggest improved utilization and appropriate attribution of productivity.With the APP workforce growing, the implementation of electronic medical record systems, and today's healthcare financial constraints, healthcare systems must standardize their billing practices. The APP billing algorithm is a critical tool that will help to meet this demand.

BACKGROUND Balancing the demands of a busy medical career with personal wellness can be daunting, and there is little education on these principles available to physicians in training. OBJECTIVE To implement a voluntary wellness initiative in our neurosurgery department to promote healthy lifestyle choices. This report details the baseline data collected as part of this quality improvement initiative. METHODS The wellness initiative was implemented in July 2015 and available to all faculty and resident physicians in the Department of Neurological Surgery in collaboration with the Medical University of South Carolina Wellness Center. All participants were provided a Fitbit Surge HR wrist monitor (Fitbit, Boston, Massachusetts) and underwent baseline physical and psychological testing. RESULTS Six faculty physicians and 9 residents participated. Overall physical fitness levels varied widely between subjects. Health screening demonstrated abnormalities in 80% of participants (elevated systolic blood pressure in 60%, elevated diastolic in 47%, elevated serum low-density lipoprotein in 53%). Body composition analysis demonstrated body weight higher than ideal in 69% (47% overweight; 13% obese). Recommended average body fat mass reduction was 25.4 pounds. Seventy-nine percent reported below-average quality of life compared with the average healthy adult. All subjects reported wanting more time for personal health. CONCLUSION Baseline health and psychological screenings in our department demonstrated alarmingly prevalent, previously undiagnosed abnormalities on cardiovascular and body weight screenings. Obstacles to leading a healthier lifestyle have been identified and solutions have been incorporated into the program. This quality improvement initiative may serve as a template for other programs seeking to improve physician physical and mental well-being. ABBREVIATIONS BMI, body mass indexESS, Epworth Sleepiness ScaleHR, heart rate.