Search

Fentanyl test strips (FTS) are increasingly used to address fentanyl contamination of the illicit drug supply by testing a drug for the presence of fentanyl, allowing people who use drugs to engage in overdose prevention. While emergency departments (EDs) have implemented various harm reduction strategies for people who use drugs, to date distribution of FTS in EDs is limited and not evaluated. Thus, we sought to explore ED staff experiences distributing FTS.Twenty-one staff serving different roles (e.g., physician, nurse, technician, social worker, certified recovery specialist) within two urban EDs in a major metropolitan area were enrolled in a pilot study to distribute FTS to patients who use drugs. Participants were interviewed about their experience at three weeks and again at three months. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded using a conventional content analysis approach.All participants endorsed the utility of FTS distribution in the ED. Across forty-two interviews, participants discussed evolving strategies to approach patients about FTS, primarily favorable patient reactions to FTS, improved dynamics between participants and patients, mixed intervention support from other staff, and named challenges of FTS distribution and recommendations to make FTS distribution in the ED widespread. Recommendations included medical records prompts to offer FTS, offering via different types of staff, and offering FTS during triage.Implementing FTS distribution may improve patient rapport while providing patients with tools to avoid a fentanyl overdose. Participants generally reported positive experiences distributing FTS within the ED but the barriers they identified limited opportunities to make distribution more integrated into their workflow. EDs considering this intervention should train staff on FTS, how to identify and train patients, and explore mechanisms to routinize distribution in the ED environment.

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present evaluation results. People exiting incarceration who use opioids are at an elevated risk for overdose following release. People living with HIV (PLWH) who use drugs are also at increased overdose risk. Overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND) is an effective community-based intervention, but few OEND programs have been evaluated in a correctional setting and none have specifically targeted PLWH. Design/methodology/approach An OEND pilot program was implemented in the Philadelphia jail from December 2017 to June 2019. OEND was provided through an HIV case management program and naloxone given at release. Participants (n = 68) were assessed for changes in overdose knowledge and beliefs in their ability to respond to an overdose from baseline to one month later while still incarcerated. Other demographic variables were assessed via publicly available records and case manager chart abstraction. Findings A total of 120 incarcerated PLWH were OEND trained; 68 (56.7%) were still incarcerated one month later and received post-tests. The 68-person sample was predominantly male (79.4%) and Black (64.7%). One-fifth reported heroin use, a third reported cocaine use and nearly 2/3 reported use of any illegal drug on date of arrest. Among these 68, overdose knowledge and overdose attitudes improved significantly (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). Originality/value OEND in correctional settings is feasible and knowledge and overdose attitudes improved significantly from baseline. OEND programs should be implemented within the general population of incarcerated people but, as with PLWH, can be extended to other vulnerable populations within correctional settings, such as persons with mental health conditions and a history of homelessness.

Fentanyl contamination in the illicit drug supply has contributed to a significant increase in overdose deaths in the United States. Fentanyl test strips (FTS), which can detect the presence of fentanyl in drugs, are increasingly given to people who use drugs (PWUD) as an overdose prevention intervention. No studies to date have described PWUD's perspectives from a real-world setting about ideal FTS program characteristics. These perspectives, specifically any identified facilitators, barriers, and suggestions for use, are crucial to informing scalability and implementation of FTS.The study team conducted qualitative interviews between January and May 2021 with PWUD in Philadelphia, PA, who had used FTS on a variety of substances. The study recruited participants outside of a harm reduction agency and provided informed consent. The team conducted interviews utilizing a semi-structured interview guide, and audio-recorded and transcribed them. The research team analyzed interviews with a conventional content analysis approach.A total of 29 PWUD participated in an interview. Participants were predominantly cisgender male (n = 21, 72.4%) and White (n = 18, 62.1%). Participants reported previously using FTS on heroin (65.5%), crack cocaine (55.2%), powder cocaine (48.3%), synthetic cannabinoids (31.0%), and benzodiazepines (24.1%). Eighty-six percent of participants learned about FTS through harm reduction or other social service organizations. Most participants incorporated FTS into their daily lives and found them easy to use. Participants identified key barriers, including lack of necessary supplies needed to test, not having an ideal testing location, and confusion reading test results. Suggestions included adding supplies needed for using FTS to distribution packets, ensuring that each PWUD receives enough FTS per distribution, and expanding the types of programs distributing FTS.While most participants reported FTS as practical and easy to use, participants identified a few key barriers to use that should be addressed to optimize FTS use across a broader population. These barriers include expanding training materials and distributing additional testing materials (e.g., water, cookers) with FTS. Findings can inform sustainable and effective FTS distribution practices, such as distributing FTS in packs of 20 and distributing at other locations that regularly interact with PWUD (e.g., emergency departments, housing shelters, and food banks).

Objective People with type 2 diabetes are likely to experience shame or guilt as they navigate through their disease. Previous research has shown that feelings of shame and guilt often exist within the clinician-patient relationship, often as a result of the complex care regimen required to achieve treatment goals. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore patients’ experiences of shame and guilt in type 2 diabetes management and the impact their clinicians have on these experiences. Methods Semistructured interviews were used to explore patients’ experiences with shame and guilt. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded using directed content analysis. Demographic data were also obtained. Results We completed 20 interviews with people with type 2 diabetes (65% Black, 70% female). Participants exhibited feelings more consistent with guilt than with shame. All participants discussed how their clinicians affected these feelings. Patients who expressed feelings of guilt were able to recognize opportunities for behavior change without experiencing global devaluation, in which they linked their actions to an unchangeable aspect of their identity or personality, often describing their guilt as motivating of change. Unlike guilt, when patients experienced shame, they often exhibited global devaluation, in which they blamed their personality, experienced hopelessness, and increased maladaptive behaviors. Conclusion Our findings highlight a notable difference between shame and guilt in the context of type 2 diabetes management. We believe that incorporation of an understanding of these nuances, along with ideal responses to both shame and guilt, will enhance clinicians’ ability to provide high-quality patient-centered care to people with diabetes.

Unintentional drug overdose fatalities due to fentanyl contamination continue to increase. Fentanyl test strip (FTS) use has emerged as a valuable harm reduction strategy to detect the presence of fentanyl in drugs. However, motivation for FTS uptake and context surrounding use have not been well characterized in the literature. This study aimed to capture people who use drugs' (PWUD) lived experiences to understand motivations underlying FTS uptake, ongoing use, and actions after testing.We conducted qualitative interviews with PWUD at a harm reduction organization in Philadelphia, PA. Interviews asked about experiences with using FTS. Interviews were audio-recorded, professionally transcribed, and reviewed. Data were analyzed through a conventional content analysis approach and organized into broader categories via team consensus.Twenty-nine PWUD with experience using FTS were interviewed between January and May 2021. Interviews were organized into three thematic categories: first time use of FTS, patterns of FTS use, and contextual factors of FTS use. Motivations to use FTS among PWUD varied, but were largely driven by factors related to knowledge, access, neighborhood, and drug market trends. Frequency of use was characterized by number of FTS, ongoing FTS access, and drug purchasing location and amount. Participants reported few logistical barriers to testing.This research supports the current literature that states FTS are an accepted and effective harm reduction strategy for the PWUD community. To support increased use of FTS, distribution campaigns should be widespread geographically and provide enough strips to ensure availability for PWUD to test more frequently.

Since 2020, people who use drugs (PWUD) experienced heightened risks related to drug supply disruptions, contamination, overdose, social isolation, and increased stress. This study explored how the lives of PWUD changed in Philadelphia over a one-year period. Using semi-structured interviews with 20 participants in a Housing First, low-barrier medication for opioid use (MOUD) program in Philadelphia, the effects of the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic on the daily lives, resources, functioning, substance use, and treatment of PWUD were explored. Interviews were analyzed using a combination of directed and conventional content analysis. Six overarching themes emerged during data analysis: (1) response to the pandemic; (2) access to MOUD and support services; (3) substance use; (4) impacts on mental health, physical health, and daily functioning; (5) social network impacts; and (6) fulfillment of basic needs. Participants reported disruptions in every domain of life, challenges meeting their basic needs, and elevated risk for adverse events. MOUD service providers offset some risks and provided material supports, treatment, social interaction, and emotional support. These results highlight how there were significant disruptions to the lives of PWUD during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic and identified critical areas for future intervention and policies.

Background Targeted naloxone distribution to potential lay responders increases the timeliness of overdose response and reduces mortality. Little is known, however, about the patterns of decision-making among overdose lay responders. This study explored heuristic decision-making among laypersons equipped with an emergency response smartphone app. Methods UnityPhilly, a smartphone app that connects lay responders equipped with naloxone to overdose victims, was piloted in Philadelphia from March 2019 to February 2020. Participants used the app to signal overdose alerts to peer app users and emergency medical services, or respond to alerts by arriving at overdose emergency sites. This study utilised in-depth interviews, background information, and app use data from a sample of 18 participants with varying histories of opioid use and levels of app use activity. Results The sample included 8 people who used opioids non-medically in the past 30 days and 10 people reporting no opioid misuse. Three prevailing, not mutually exclusive, heuristics were identified. The heuristic of unconditional signalling (“Always signal for help or backup”) was used by 7 people who valued external assistance and used the app as a replacement for a 911 call; this group had the highest number of signalled alerts and on-scene appearances. Nine people, who expressed confidence in their ability to address an overdose themselves, followed a heuristic of conditional signalling (“Rescue, but only signal if necessary”); these participants had the highest frequency of prior naloxone administrations. Eleven participants used the heuristic of conditional responding (“Assess if I can make a difference”), addressing an alert if they carried naloxone, were nearby, or received a signal before dark hours. Conclusion The deployment of specific heuristics was influenced by prior naloxone use and situational factors. Success of overdose prevention interventions assisted by digital technologies may depend on the involvement of people with diverse overdose rescue backgrounds.

Background Fentanyl dominates the heroin supply in many regions of the United States. One harm reduction response has been the distribution of fentanyl test strips to people who use heroin to test for the presence of fentanyl. Reports increasingly indicate that fentanyl contamination is occurring in the illicit stimulant market, but whether people who use stimulants would use fentanyl test strips is unknown. Methods Between January 2019 and January 2020, fifteen people in Philadelphia, PA who reported stimulant use completed a semi-structured interview with questions about their perceptions of fentanyl and willingness to use fentanyl test strips. Data were coded and analyzed for thematic content using constructs from the Health Belief Model and risk environment theory. Results Participants primarily reported using crack cocaine or crack cocaine/heroin, while some used methamphetamine, powder cocaine, or prescription opioids. All were aware of fentanyl and believed they were susceptible to a fentanyl overdose as stimulant users. Participants perceived benefits of using test strips but reported barriers, such as the unpredictable nature of buying or using drugs and not wanting to delay drug use to test. Structural conditions impeded participant actions to reduce overdose risk if their drugs tested positive for fentanyl. Conclusion Fentanyl test strips were a desired harm reduction tool by many participants who used stimulants. In addition to providing access to the strips, programs should tailor overdose prevention education to these clients by acknowledging susceptibility, amplifying benefits, and addressing drug-specific barriers to use of fentanyl test strips.