Search

The mainstay of treatment for adult patients with gliomas, glioneuronal and neuronal tumors consists of combinations of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. For many systemic cancers, targeted treatments are a part of the standard of care, however, the predictive significance of most of these targets in central nervous system (CNS) tumors remains less well-studied. Despite that, there is increasing use of advanced molecular diagnostics that identify potential targets, and tumor-agnostic regulatory approvals on targets also present in CNS tumors have been granted. This raises the question of when and for which targets it is meaningful to test in adult patients with CNS tumors. This evidence-based guideline reviews the evidence available for targeted treatment for alterations in the RAS/MAPK pathway (BRAF, NF1), in growth factor receptors (EGFR, ALK, fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK), platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha, and ROS1), in cell cycle signaling (CDK4/6, MDM2/4, and TSC1/2) and altered genomic stability (mismatch repair, POLE, high tumor mutational burden (TMB), homologous recombination deficiency) in adult patients with gliomas, glioneuronal and neuronal tumors. At present, targeted treatment for BRAF p.V600E alterations is to be considered part of the standard of care for patients with recurrent gliomas, pending regulatory approval. For approved tumor agnostic treatments for NTRK fusions and high TMB, the evidence for efficacy in adult patients with CNS tumors is very limited, and treatment should preferably be given within prospective clinical registries and trials. For targeted treatment of CNS tumors with FGFR fusions or mutations, clinical trials are ongoing to confirm modest activity so far observed in basket trials. For all other reviewed targets, evidence of benefit in CNS tumors is currently lacking, and testing/treatment should be in the context of available clinical trials.

Background and ObjectivesD-2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG) characterizesIDH-mutant gliomas and can be detected and quantified with edited MRS (MEGA-PRESS). In this study, we investigated the clinical, radiologic, and molecular parameters affecting 2HG levels.MethodsMEGA-PRESS data were acquired in 71 patients with glioma (24 untreated, 47 treated) on a 3 T system. Eighteen patients were followed during cytotoxic (n = 12) or targeted (n = 6) therapy. 2HG was measured in tumor samples using gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GCMS).ResultsMEGA-PRESS detected 2HG with a sensitivity of 95% in untreated patients and 62% in treated patients. Sensitivity depended on tumor volume (>27 cm3;p= 0.02), voxel coverage (>75%;p= 0.002), and expansive presentation (defined by equal size of T1and FLAIR abnormalities,p= 0.04). 2HG levels were positively correlated withIDH-mutant allelic fraction (p= 0.03) and total choline levels (p< 0.001) and were higher inIDH2-mutant compared withIDH1R132H-mutant and non–R132HIDH1-mutant patients (p= 0.002). In patients receiving IDH inhibitors, 2HG levels decreased within a few days, demonstrating the on-target effect of the drug, but 2HG level decrease did not predict tumor response. Patients receiving cytotoxic treatments showed a slower decrease in 2HG levels, consistent with tumor response and occurring before any tumor volume change on conventional MRI. At progression, 1p/19q codeleted gliomas, but not the non-codeleted, showed detectable in vivo 2HG levels, pointing out to different modes of progression characterizing these 2 entities.DiscussionMEGA-PRESS edited MRS allows in vivo monitoring of 2-hydroxyglutarate, confirming efficacy ofIDHinhibition and suggests different patterns of tumor progression in astrocytomas compared with oligodendrogliomas.

OBJECTIVE The literature shows discrepancies in stereotactic brain biopsy complication rates, severities, and outcomes. Little is known about the timeline of postbiopsy complications. This study aimed to analyze 1) complications following brain biopsies, using a graded severity scale, and 2) a timeline of complication occurrence. The secondary objectives were to determine factors associated with an increased risk of complications and to assess complication-related management and extra costs. METHODS The authors retrospectively examined 1500 consecutive stereotactic brain biopsies performed in adult patients at their tertiary medical center between April 2009 and April 2019. RESULTS Three hundred eighty-one biopsies (25.4%) were followed by a complication, including 88.2% of asymptomatic hemorrhages. Symptomatic complications involved 3.0% of the biopsies, and 0.8% of the biopsies were fatal. The severity grading scale had a 97.6% interobserver reproducibility. Twenty-three (51.1%) of the 45 symptomatic complications occurred within the 1st hour following the biopsy, while 75.6% occurred within the first 6 hours. Age ≥ 65 years, second biopsy procedures, gadolinium-enhanced lesions, glioblastomas, and lymphomas were predictors of biopsy-related complications. Brainstem biopsy-targeted lesions and cerebral toxoplasmosis were predictive of mortality. Asymptomatic hemorrhage was associated with delayed (> 6 hours) symptomatic complications. Symptomatic complications led to extended hospitalization in 86.7% of patients. The average extra cost for management of a patient with postbiopsy symptomatic complication was $35,702. CONCLUSIONS Symptomatic complications from brain biopsies are infrequent but associated with substantial adverse effects and cost implications for the healthcare system. The use of a severity grading scale, as the authors propose in this article, helps to classify complications according to the therapeutic consequences and the patient’s outcome. Because this study indicates that most complications occur within the first few hours following the biopsy, postbiopsy monitoring can be tailored accordingly. The authors therefore recommend systematic monitoring for 2 hours in the recovery unit and a CT scan 2 hours after the end of the biopsy procedure. In addition, they propose a modern algorithm for optimal postoperative management of patients undergoing stereotactic biopsy.

Recent studies showed that patients with glioma can safely participate in early phase clinical trials; however, clinical benefits in this population were limited. We aimed to evaluate the benefit of molecular profiling to guide enrolment in early phase trials for patients with recurrent glioma.Records of patients enrolled in early phase trials of cytotoxic therapies, small molecule inhibitors or monoclonal antibodies from 2008 to 2018 were reviewed for clinico-pathological characteristics, toxicity, response, progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). The primary objective was to evaluate response rates in molecularly-oriented versus non-molecularly-oriented patients.Eighty-eight patients were enrolled, of whom 45 (51.1%) patients were molecularly-oriented. Targets included IDH1/2 (n = 15), BRAF (n = 11), and FGFR1 (n = 3) mutations, FGFR2-3 fusions (n = 9), and mismatch repair deficiency (n = 7). Among patients with high-grade glioma (n = 74), the rate of stable disease ≥6 months and partial or complete response was 25.7% in molecularly-oriented versus 5.1% in non-molecularly-oriented patients (p = 0.02). Upon multivariable adjustment, baseline steroid use ≥20 mg prednisone equivalent per day was associated with shorter OS (OR 3.15 [95% CI 1.62-6.13], p = 0.0008), while molecular enrichment strategy was associated with longer OS (OR 0.40 [95% CI 0.22-0.73], p = 0.003). Nine (10.2%) patients experienced grade 3-4 toxicity and no dose limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred in both cohorts.The use of molecular profiling to guide enrolment in early phase trials is feasible and might provide benefits to selected patients with glioma. Further studies are warranted to confirm these results in larger randomised settings and identify the patients most likely to benefit from this approach.

Brain biopsy is a useful surgical procedure in the management of patients with suspected neoplastic lesions. Its role in neurologic diseases of unknown etiology remains controversial, especially in ICU patients. This study was undertaken to determine the feasibility, safety, and the diagnostic yield of brain biopsy in critically ill patients with neurologic diseases of unknown etiology. We also aimed to compare these endpoints to those of non-ICU patients who underwent a brain biopsy in the same clinical context.Monocenter, retrospective, observational cohort study.A French tertiary center.All adult patients with neurologic diseases of unknown etiology under mechanical ventilation undergoing in-ICU brain biopsy between January 2008 and October 2020 were compared with a cohort of non-ICU patients.None.Among the 2,207 brain-biopsied patients during the study period, 234 biopsies were performed for neurologic diseases of unknown etiology, including 29 who were mechanically ventilated and 205 who were not ICU patients. Specific histological diagnosis and final diagnosis rates were 62.1% and 75.9%, respectively, leading to therapeutic management modification in 62.1% of cases. Meningitis on prebiopsy cerebrospinal fluid analysis was the sole predictor of obtaining a final diagnosis (2.3 [1.4-3.8]; p = 0.02). ICU patients who experienced therapeutic management modification after the biopsy had longer survival (p = 0.03). The grade 1 to 4 (mild to severe) complication rates were: 24.1%, 3.5%, 0%, and 6.9%, respectively. Biopsy-related mortality was significantly higher in ICU patients compared with non-ICU patients (6.9% vs 0%; p = 0.02). Hematological malignancy was associated with biopsy-related mortality (1.5 [1.01-2.6]; p = 0.04).Brain biopsy in critically ill patients with neurologic disease of unknown etiology is associated with high diagnostic yield, therapeutic modifications and postbiopsy survival advantage. Safety profile seems acceptable in most patients. The benefit/risk ratio of brain biopsy in this population should be carefully weighted.

Supplementary Figure 4. The FGFR3-TACC3 fusion gene and protein are retained in recurrent GBM.

Supplementary Figure 3. Evaluation of the expression of FGFR3-TACC3 fusion elements.

Supplementary Figure 2. Schematics of FGFR3-TACC3 genomic breakpoints.

Supplementary Figure Legends

Supplementary Table 1. Summary of FGFR-TACC fusion transcripts identified in all cancer types.

Supplementary Figure 6. Analysis of SNP6.0 arrays of GBM harboring CNVs of FGFR3 and TACC3 genomic loci.

Purpose: Oncogenic fusions consisting of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) and TACC are present in a subgroup of glioblastoma (GBM) and other human cancers and have been proposed as new therapeutic targets. We analyzed frequency and molecular features of FGFR–TACC fusions and explored the therapeutic efficacy of inhibiting FGFR kinase in GBM and grade II and III glioma.Experimental Design: Overall, 795 gliomas (584 GBM, 85 grades II and III with wild-type and 126 with IDH1/2 mutation) were screened for FGFR–TACC breakpoints and associated molecular profile. We also analyzed expression of the FGFR3 and TACC3 components of the fusions. The effects of the specific FGFR inhibitor JNJ-42756493 for FGFR3–TACC3–positive glioma were determined in preclinical experiments. Two patients with advanced FGFR3–TACC3–positive GBM received JNJ-42756493 and were assessed for therapeutic response.Results: Three of 85 IDH1/2 wild-type (3.5%) but none of 126 IDH1/2-mutant grade II and III gliomas harbored FGFR3–TACC3 fusions. FGFR–TACC rearrangements were present in 17 of 584 GBM (2.9%). FGFR3–TACC3 fusions were associated with strong and homogeneous FGFR3 immunostaining. They are mutually exclusive with IDH1/2 mutations and EGFR amplification, whereas they co-occur with CDK4 amplification. JNJ-42756493 inhibited growth of glioma cells harboring FGFR3–TACC3 in vitro and in vivo. The two patients with FGFR3–TACC3 rearrangements who received JNJ-42756493 manifested clinical improvement with stable disease and minor response, respectively.Conclusions: RT-PCR sequencing is a sensitive and specific method to identify FGFR–TACC–positive patients. FGFR3–TACC3 fusions are associated with uniform intratumor expression of the fusion protein. The clinical response observed in the FGFR3–TACC3–positive patients treated with an FGFR inhibitor supports clinical studies of FGFR inhibition in FGFR–TACC–positive patients. Clin Cancer Res; 21(14); 3307–17. ©2015 AACR.See related commentary by Ahluwalia and Rich, p. 3105

Supplementary Figure 1. Genomic PCR images and Sanger sequences of FGFR3-TACC3 genomic breakpoints.

Supplementary Figure 5. PFS and OS of FGFR3-TACC3-positive glioma patients.

Background The optimal chemotherapy regimen between temozolomide and procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) remains uncertain for WHO grade 3 oligodendroglioma (Olig3) patients. We therefore investigated this question using national data. Methods Patients diagnosed with radiotherapy-treated 1p/19q-codeleted Olig3 between 2010 and 2018 were identified from the National Cancer Database. The overall survival (OS) associated with first-line single-agent temozolomide vs multi-agent PCV was estimated by Kaplan-Meier techniques and evaluated by multivariable Cox regression. Results One thousand five hundred ninety-six radiotherapy-treated 1p/19q-codeleted Olig3 patients were identified: 88.6% (n = 1414) treated with temozolomide and 11.4% (n = 182) with PCV (from 5.4% in 2010 to 12.0% in 2018) in the first-line setting. The median follow-up was 35.5 months (interquartile range [IQR] 20.7-60.6 months) with 63.3% of patients alive at the time of analysis. There was a significant difference in unadjusted OS between temozolomide (5-year OS 58.9%, 95%CI: 55.6-62.0) and PCV (5-year OS 65.1%, 95%CI: 54.8-73.5; P = .04). However, a significant OS difference between temozolomide and PCV was not observed in the Cox regression analysis adjusted by age and extent of resection (PCV vs temozolomide HR 0.81, 95%CI: 0.59-1.11, P = .18). PCV was more frequently used for younger Olig3s but otherwise was not associated with patient’s insurance status or care setting. Conclusions In a national analysis of Olig3s, first-line PCV chemotherapy was associated with a slightly improved unadjusted short-term OS compared to temozolomide; but not following adjustment by patient age and extent of resection. There has been an increase in PCV utilization since 2010. These findings provide preliminary data while we await the definitive results from the CODEL trial.

Purpose of review Recent evidence suggests high tumor mutational burden (TMB-H) as a predictor of response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in cancer. However, results in TMB-H gliomas have been inconsistent. In this article, we discuss the main pathways leading to TMB-H in glioma and how these might affect immunotherapy response. Recent findings Recent characterization of TMB-H gliomas showed that 'post-treatment' related to mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency is the most common mechanism leading to TMB-H in gliomas. Unexpectedly, preliminary evidence suggested that benefit with ICB is rare in this population. Contrary to expectations, ICB response was reported in a subset of TMB-H gliomas associated with constitutional MMR or polymerase epsilon (POLE) defects (e.g., constitutional biallelic MMRd deficiency). In other cancers, several trials suggest increased ICB efficacy is critically associated with increased lymphocyte infiltration at baseline which is missing in most gliomas. Further characterization of the immune microenvironment of gliomas is needed to identify biomarkers to select the patients who will benefit from ICB. Summary Intrinsic molecular and immunological differences between gliomas and other cancers might explain the lack of efficacy of ICB in a subset of TMB-H gliomas. Novel combinations and biomarkers are awaited to improve immunotherapy response in these cancers.

This study aimed to assess the benefit-risk ratio by determining diagnostic yield and safety of brainstem biopsies in adult patients. The secondary objectives were (i) to compare brainstem biopsy safety and postbiopsy patients' outcomes and survival with those of patients biopsied for a brain or cerebellar lesion, and (ii) to assess the impact of brainstem biopsy on final diagnosis and further therapeutic management.Among 1784 stereotactic biopsies performed in adult patients at a tertiary center between April 2009 and October 2020, we retrospectively examined 50 consecutive brainstem biopsies. We compared variables regarding diagnostic yield, safety and post-biopsy outcomes between brainstem biopsy patients and brain/cerebellum biopsy patients.Brainstem biopsy led to a diagnosis in 86% of patients (94.6% in patients with suspected tumor). Lesion contrast enhancement on imaging was the sole predictor of obtaining a diagnosis. Rates of symptomatic complications and mortality were significantly higher in brainstem biopsy patients compared to brain/cerebellum biopsy patients (20% vs 0%; p 0.001 and 6% vs 0%; p = 0.01, respectively). Transfrontal trajectory and prebiopsy swallowing disorders were predictors of brainstem biopsy-related symptomatic complications. Brainstem biopsy findings led to diagnostic change in 22% of patients.Stereotactic biopsy in adult patients with brainstem lesion has a high diagnostic yield. Although stereotactic brainstem biopsy is associated with more functional and fatal complications than biopsies targeting the brain/cerebellum, its safety profile appears acceptable. Thus, the benefit-risk ratio of stereotactic biopsy in patients with brainstem lesion is favorable but should nevertheless be carefully weighted on a case-by-case basis.

ObjectiveTo assess whether RAF and MEK inhibitors (RAFi/MEKi) can provide long-term clinical benefit in adult patients with BRAF V600–mutant glial and glioneuronal tumors (GGNTs), we analyzed tumor response and long-term outcome in a retrospective cohort.MethodsWe performed a retrospective search in the institutional databases of 6 neuro-oncology departments for adult patients with recurrent or disseminated BRAF V600–mutant GGNTs treated with RAFi/MEKi.ResultsTwenty-eight adults with recurrent or disseminated BRAF V600–mutant gangliogliomas (n = 9), pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas (n = 9), and diffuse gliomas (n = 10) were included in the study. At the time that treatment with RAFi/MEKi was started, all tumors displayed radiologic features of high-grade neoplasms. Thirteen patients received RAFi as single agents (vemurafenib [n = 11], dabrafenib [n = 2]), and 15 received combinations of RAFi/MEKi (vemurafenib + cobimetinib [n = 5], dabrafenib + trametinib [n = 10]). Eleven patients achieved a partial or complete response (11 of 28, 39%), with a median reduction of −78% in their tumor burden. Responders experienced a median increase of 10 points in their Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score and a median progression-free survival of 18 months, which was longer than achieved with first-line treatment (i.e., 7 months, p = 0.047). Responders had better KPS score (p = 0.018) and tended to be younger (p = 0.061) and to be treated earlier (p = 0.099) compared to nonresponders. Five patients were rechallenged with RAFi/MEKi at progression, with novel tumor responses in 2. On univariate and multivariate analyses, response to RAFi/MEKi was an independent predictor of overall survival.ConclusionsOur study highlights the long-term clinical benefits of RAFi/MEKi in adult patients with BRAF V600–mutant GGNTs and encourages rechallenge in responders.Classification of EvidenceThis study provides Class III evidence that, for adult patients with BRAF V600-mutant GGNT, RAFi/MEKi can reduce tumor burden and provide clinical benefit.

Approximately 25% of recurrent gliomas exhibit hypermutation, which is most often acquired in chemotherapy sensitive gliomas post-treatment with standard of care alkylating agent temozolomide, Intriguingly, nearly all of these recurrent hypermutant tumors harbor deficiencies in mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Unlike other MMR-deficient cancers, hypermutant gliomas do not exhibit detectable microsatellite instability (MSI) at the population level, and do not share similar dependencies. Thus, strategies to therapeutically target MMR-deficient and hypermutant gliomas are urgently needed, and likely to impact many patients. To evaluate vulnerabilities associated with MMR-deficient gliomas, we have generated isogenic MMR-deficient models by systematic ablation of core MMR genes MSH2, MSH6, MLH1, and PMS2, in multiple patient-derived glioma cell lines using a robust all-in-one CRISPR-Cas9 system. We characterized these isogenic MMR-deficient glioma lines in comparison to respective MMR-proficient control line by performing differential gene expression analysis and subsequent gene set enrichment analyses. Our analyses reveal in an unbiased fashion an enrichment of several hallmark gene sets including cell cycle control and DNA repair in the MMR-deficient cell lines. We performed a CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screen in these MMR deficient and hypermutant models and identified candidate genes involved in DNA repair, cell cycle, RNA metabolism and other pathways as preferential dependencies in the MMR-deficient glioma cells. We also screened multiple MMR-deficient isogenic models against the high-throughput drug repurposing (REPO) chemical library and our preliminary results reveal a number of compounds from a variety of drug classes that selectively kill the MMR-deficient glioma cells, indicating that the loss of MMR confers differential dependencies to these small molecule inhibitors. The candidate drugs and genes identified from these high-throughput assays are currently being subjected to further validation, and they possibly will help us identify novel therapeutic strategies or improve existing therapeutic strategies to target recurrent MMR-deficient gliomas.

BACKGROUND Patients with recurrent glioma have limited treatment options. The anti‒ PD-1 monoclonal antibody pembrolizumab demonstrated antitumor activity as monotherapy in a subset of patients with PD-L1–positive recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) in the KEYNOTE-028 study; and durable clinical benefit in patients with previously treated unresectable/metastatic MSI-H/dMMR non-colorectal tumors in the multicohort KEYNOTE-158 (NCT02628067) study. We report outcomes with pembrolizumab in patients with MSI-H/dMMR recurrent glioma enrolled in KEYNOTE-158. METHODS Adults with MSI-H/dMMR recurrent glioma, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, ECOG PS 0/1, and tumor sample for biomarker analysis were eligible for cohort K (any MSI-H/dMMR advanced solid tumor, except colorectal cancer; local, prospective determination of MSI-H/dMMR status by PCR and/or IHC). Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for up to 35 cycles or until PD/unacceptable AEs (clinically stable patients could continue treatment until PD confirmed after ≥ 4 weeks). Primary endpoint was ORR per RECIST v1.1 by independent central review. RESULTS Among 21 enrolled patients, all received prior temozolomide, 12 (57%) received prior bevacizumab, and 14 (67%) received ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy. 14 (67%) patients had GBM, 4 (19%) had oligodendroglioma/oligoastrocytoma, and 3 (14%) had glioma NOS. Median time from first dose to data cutoff (January 12, 2022): 50.0 months; 19 (90%) patients discontinued treatment. 1 patient with GBM had PR (ORR, 4.8% [95%CI, 0.1%‒23.8%]); duration of response was 18.9 months, PFS 29.2 months, and OS 32.7 months. 3 (14%) patients had SD; PFS was 23.2, 14.5, and 3.3 months; OS was 23.2, 15.1, and 9.1 months. Overall, median PFS and OS (95%CI) were 1.4 (1.0‒2.1) months and 5.6 (2.6‒16.2) months. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 7 (33%) patients (grade 3/4, n = 1; no grade 5) and led to discontinuation in 1 (5%) patient. CONCLUSIONS Pembrolizumab demonstrated antitumor activity with manageable toxicity in a small subset of patients with relapsing/refractory MSI-H/dMMR glioma.

Tumors with microsatellite instability (MSI) represent a paradigm for the success of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based immunotherapy, particularly in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). To date however, tools for predicting efficacy of these new therapies are lacking. Here we combined high-throughput DNA and RNA sequencing of tumors from 117 patients with MSI mCRC treated with anti-PD-1 +/- anti-CTLA-4 and enrolled into two cohorts, i.e., the NIPICOL clinical trial (NCT03350126) and the ImmunoMSI prospective cohort that were used as discovery and validation cohorts in this ancillary study, respectively. All analyses based on previously suggested DNA/RNA biomarkers of resistance failed to identify robust predictors of treatment response in patients, e.g., the level of MSI, mutational burden, the presence of specific somatic DNA variants as assessed by exome-sequencing and the activity of canonical signaling pathways or the presence of specific cellular contingents within the tumor bulk as estimated by RNA-sequencing. By contrast, resistance to ICI was found to depend both on a small subset of somatic DNA variants located in microsatellite-containing genes with very diverse biological functions and the expression of a stromal-oriented RNA component. Testing of these predictors in 5 large additional independent retrospective and prospective cohorts (IDEA and MOSAIC clinical trials) regrouping 446 patients with nonmetastatic or metastatic MSI CRC untreated with ICI allowed us to validate the specificity of the predictive nature of these indicators regarding ICI-treated MSI mCRC patients. The use of these DNA/RNA predictors will help to refine the ICI-based precision therapy of patients with metastatic MSI mCRC.

PURPOSE Diffuse gliomas are malignant brain tumors that include lower-grade gliomas (LGGs) and glioblastomas. Transformation of low-grade glioma into a higher tumor grade is typically associated with contrast enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging. Mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 ( IDH1) gene occur in most LGGs (> 70%). Ivosidenib is an inhibitor of mutant IDH1 (mIDH1) under evaluation in patients with solid tumors. METHODS We conducted a multicenter, open-label, phase I, dose escalation and expansion study of ivosidenib in patients with m IDH1 solid tumors. Ivosidenib was administered orally daily in 28-day cycles. RESULTS In 66 patients with advanced gliomas, ivosidenib was well tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicities reported. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached; 500 mg once per day was selected for the expansion cohort. The grade ≥ 3 adverse event rate was 19.7%; 3% (n = 2) were considered treatment related. In patients with nonenhancing glioma (n = 35), the objective response rate was 2.9%, with 1 partial response. Thirty of 35 patients (85.7%) with nonenhancing glioma achieved stable disease compared with 14 of 31 (45.2%) with enhancing glioma. Median progression-free survival was 13.6 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 33.2 months) and 1.4 months (95% CI, 1.0 to 1.9 months) for the nonenhancing and enhancing glioma cohorts, respectively. In an exploratory analysis, ivosidenib reduced the volume and growth rates of nonenhancing tumors. CONCLUSION In patients with m IDH1 advanced glioma, ivosidenib 500 mg once per day was associated with a favorable safety profile, prolonged disease control, and reduced growth of nonenhancing tumors.

International audience; Background and purpose: The rationale for performing a second brain biopsy after initial negativity is not well evaluated in the literature. This study was designed to 1) assess the efficacy of a second brain biopsy when the first biopsy was nondiagnostic, 2) identify possible factors associated with an increased diagnostic rate in the second biopsy, and 3) analyze additional morbidity induced by the second biopsy.Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study from 2009 to 2019, during which 1,919 patients underwent a brain biopsy, including 30 who were biopsied twice (1.6%). The specific histological diagnosis rate, diagnosis-associated factors, and complication rate were assessed for the 30 twice-biopsied patients.Results: The second biopsy allowed a specific histological diagnosis in 86.7% of the patients who had initially undergone a nondiagnostic brain biopsy [odds ratio (OR)=7.5, 95% confidence interval (CI)=3.0-18.7, p

A high tumour mutational burden (hypermutation) is observed in some gliomas1–5; however, the mechanisms by which hypermutation develops and whether it predicts the response to immunotherapy are poorly understood. Here we comprehensively analyse the molecular determinants of mutational burden and signatures in 10,294 gliomas. We delineate two main pathways to hypermutation: a de novo pathway associated with constitutional defects in DNA polymerase and mismatch repair (MMR) genes, and a more common post-treatment pathway, associated with acquired resistance driven by MMR defects in chemotherapy-sensitive gliomas that recur after treatment with the chemotherapy drug temozolomide. Experimentally, the mutational signature of post-treatment hypermutated gliomas was recapitulated by temozolomide-induced damage in cells with MMR deficiency. MMR-deficient gliomas were characterized by a lack of prominent T cell infiltrates, extensive intratumoral heterogeneity, poor patient survival and a low rate of response to PD-1 blockade. Moreover, although bulk analyses did not detect microsatellite instability in MMR-deficient gliomas, single-cell whole-genome sequencing analysis of post-treatment hypermutated glioma cells identified microsatellite mutations. These results show that chemotherapy can drive the acquisition of hypermutated populations without promoting a response to PD-1 blockade and supports the diagnostic use of mutational burden and signatures in cancer. Temozolomide therapy seems to lead to mismatch repair deficiency and hypermutation in gliomas, but not to an increase in response to immunotherapy.