Search

Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) is an abundant phosphoprotein phosphatase that acts as a tumor suppressor. For this reason, compounds able to activate PP2A are attractive anticancer agents. The compounds iHAP1 and DT-061 have recently been reported to selectively stabilize specific PP2A-B56 complexes to mediate cell killing. We were unable to detect direct effects of iHAP1 and DT-061 on PP2A-B56 activity in biochemical assays and composition of holoenzymes. Therefore, we undertook genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 synthetic lethality screens to uncover biological pathways affected by these compounds. We found that knockout of mitotic regulators is synthetic lethal with iHAP1 while knockout of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi components is synthetic lethal with DT-061. Indeed we showed that iHAP1 directly blocks microtubule assembly both in vitro and in vivo and thus acts as a microtubule poison. In contrast, DT-061 disrupts both the Golgi apparatus and the ER and lipid synthesis associated with these structures. Our work provides insight into the biological pathways perturbed by iHAP1 and DT-061 causing cellular toxicity and argues that these compounds cannot be used for dissecting PP2A-B56 biology.

PP2A is an abundant phosphoprotein phosphatase that acts as a tumor suppressor. For this reason, compounds able to activate PP2A are attractive anticancer agents. The small molecule compounds iHAP1 and DT-061 have recently been reported by Leonard et al. (2020) and Morita et al. (2020) in Cell to selectively stabilize specific PP2A-B56 complexes which mediate cell killing. Here, we show that this is not the case and question key findings in these papers. Through genome wide CRISPR-Cas9 screens, we uncover the biological pathways targeted by these compounds. We find that iHAP1 directly blocks microtubule assembly both in vitro and in vivo and thus acts as a microtubule poison. In contrast, DT-061 disrupts both the Golgi apparatus and the endoplasmic reticulum and we directly visualize DT-061 in cytoplasmic granules that co-localize with Golgi markers. Our work demonstrates that iHAP1 and DT-061 cannot be used for dissecting PP2A-B56 biology.

The shugoshin proteins are universal protectors of centromeric cohesin during mitosis and meiosis. The binding of human hSgo1 to the PP2A‐B56 phosphatase through a coiled‐coil (CC) region mediates cohesion protection during mitosis. Here we undertook a structure function analysis of the PP2A‐B56‐hSgo1 complex, revealing unanticipated aspects of complex formation and function. We establish that a highly conserved pocket on the B56 regulatory subunit is required for hSgo1 binding and cohesion protection during mitosis in human somatic cells. Consistent with this, we show that hSgo1 blocks the binding of PP2A‐B56 substrates containing a canonical B56 binding motif. We find that PP2A‐B56 bound to hSgo1 dephosphorylates Cdk1 sites on hSgo1 itself to modulate cohesin interactions. Collectively our work provides important insight into cohesion protection during mitosis., The interaction between hSgo1 and PP2A‐B56 is investigated which uncovers a conserved pocket on the B56 subunit required for cohesion protection. PP2A‐B56 is shown to negatively regulate hSgo1‐cohesin interaction by dephosphorylating hSgo1.

The shugoshin proteins are universal protectors of centromeric cohesin during mitosis and meiosis. The binding of human Sgo1 to the PP2A-B56 phosphatase through a coiled coil (CC) region is believed to mediate cohesion protection during mitosis. Here we undertook a structure function analysis of the PP2A-B56-Sgo1 complex, revealing unanticipated aspects of complex formation and function. We establish that a highly conserved pocket of the B56 regulatory subunit is required for Sgo1 binding and cohesion protection. Consistent with this, we show that Sgo1 blocks the binding of PP2A-B56 substrates containing a canonical B56 binding motif. Surprisingly, we identify B56 and Sgo1 mutants that prevent complex formation yet support cohesion protection and normal mitotic progression. This suggests that Sgo1 and PP2A-B56 have cohesion protection activity independently of complex formation. Collectively our work provides important insight into cohesion protection during mitosis.

Dynamic protein phosphorylation constitutes a fundamental regulatory mechanism in all organisms. Phosphoprotein phosphatase 4 (PP4) is a conserved and essential nuclear serine and threonine phosphatase. Despite the importance of PP4, general principles of substrate selection are unknown, hampering the study of signal regulation by this phosphatase. Here, we identify and thoroughly characterize a general PP4 consensus-binding motif, the FxxP motif. X-ray crystallography studies reveal that FxxP motifs bind to a conserved pocket in the PP4 regulatory subunit PPP4R3. Systems-wide in silico searches integrated with proteomic analysis of PP4 interacting proteins allow us to identify numerous FxxP motifs in proteins controlling a range of fundamental cellular processes. We identify an FxxP motif in the cohesin release factor WAPL and show that this regulates WAPL phosphorylation status and is required for efficient cohesin release. Collectively our work uncovers basic principles of PP4 specificity with broad implications for understanding phosphorylation-mediated signaling in cells.