Search

Transient elastometry is a noninvasive procedure used to measure fibrosis when patients are diagnosed with liver disease; it might be used to monitor changes over time. We investigated whether there are short-term variations in stiffness measurements that are not attributable to changes in fibrosis by studying patients with stable liver disease.We performed a retrospective analysis of 531 paired liver stiffness measurements made by Fibroscan when the study began (LSM1) and at follow-up (LSM2), more than 1 day and less than 1 year apart, from 432 stable (for body mass index, waist circumference, and alcohol consumption), untreated, immunocompetent patients with chronic liver disease (from January 2006 through March 2009). Variations between the first and follow-up measurements were expressed as absolute (LSM2-LSM1, kPa) or relative ([LSM2-LSM1]/LSM1*100) or as changes in fibrosis stage.There was20% variation in 49.7%,30% in 34.3%, and50% in 12.2% of paired measurements; this variation was constant across the spectrum of LSM1 values. The variations produced a 1-fibrosis stage difference in 31.5% of pairs and a ≥ 2-stage difference in 9.8% of pairs. Patients with LSM17 kPa had increased probability of having a different stage of fibrosis at LSM2, compared with patients with LSM17 kPa. Factors associated with variation included measurements made by 2 different operators or at least 1 non-senior operator, ratios of interquartile range:median values, significant fibrosis (≥ 7 kPa) at LSM1, baseline body mass index, or a 2-fold difference in level of alanine aminotransferase between measurements. When the analyses were restricted to measurements made by the same operator, the variation was slightly reduced; fibrosis stage differed between measurements for only 34.3% of cases.Operator-related and patient-related factors produce significant variations in liver stiffness measurements made by transient elastometry, limiting its use in monitoring patients. These variations are unrelated to disease progression. The lowest levels of variation occur in measurements made in patients with no or early-stage fibrosis or by a single experienced operator.

The major hepatological consequence of HCV infection is the progression to cirrhosis and its potential complications. Several factors have been clearly shown to be associated with fibrosis progression rate: duration of infection, age, male sex, consumption of alcohol, HIV coinfection and low CD4 count. As age and duration of infection increases, the risk of fibrosis increases and the impact of treatment (IFN) decreases. In conclusion, fibrosis progression has a progressive acceleration, sex, age and consumption of alcohol are strongly involved in this progression ; the possibility to assess with nonagressive biochemical markers the fibrosis stage will probably allow in the future to identify other factors related to fibrosis progression.

As an alternative to liver biopsy, an index of five biochemical markers (α2-macroglobulin, apolipoprotein A1, haptoglobin, total bilirubin, γ-glutamyl-transpeptidase) has been shown to predict the severity of hepatitis C-related fibrosis. The objective of this study was to compare this index with other markers frequently used for this purpose (prothrombin time, platelets, age–platelet index). In 323 hepatitis C-infected patients, the discriminative values of these markers for F2–F4 fibrosis (by the METAVIR classification) were compared. By multiple logistic regression analysis, only the five-marker index (P < 0.0001) and prothrombin time (P = 0.02) were independently predictive of F2–F4 fibrosis. For this outcome, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was significantly higher for the five-marker index (0.836 ± 0.024) than the age-platelet index (P = 0.002), and the platelet count and prothrombin time (P < 0.001), indicating greater diagnostic value. The addition of the latter markers to the five-marker index proved unhelpful for increasing its accuracy. In conclusion, an index of five biochemical markers accurately predicts significant hepatitis C-related fibrosis and is superior to traditional markers.

As an alternative to liver biopsy, an index of five biochemical markers (alpha2-macroglobulin, apolipoprotein A1, haptoglobin, total bilirubin, gamma-glutamyl-transpeptidase) has been shown to predict the severity of hepatitis C-related fibrosis. The objective of this study was to compare this index with other markers frequently used for this purpose (prothrombin time, platelets, age-platelet index). In 323 hepatitis C-infected patients, the discriminative values of these markers for F2-F4 fibrosis (by the METAVIR classification) were compared. By multiple logistic regression analysis, only the five-marker index (P0.0001) and prothrombin time (P = 0.02) were independently predictive of F2-F4 fibrosis. For this outcome, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was significantly higher for the five-marker index (0.836 +/- 0.024) than the age-platelet index (P = 0.002), and the platelet count and prothrombin time (P0.001), indicating greater diagnostic value. The addition of the latter markers to the five-marker index proved unhelpful for increasing its accuracy. In conclusion, an index of five biochemical markers accurately predicts significant hepatitis C-related fibrosis and is superior to traditional markers.