Search

Abstract Impulsive-compulsive behaviour (ICB) is a frequently observed non-motor symptom in early Parkinson’s disease after initiating dopamine replacement therapy. At the opposite end of the motivated behaviour spectrum, apathy occurs in early Parkinson’s disease even before dopamine replacement is started. The co-occurrence of these behavioural conditions in Parkinson’s disease raises questions about their relationship and underlying pathophysiological determinants. In previous imaging or genetic studies, both conditions have been associated with the limbic dopaminergic system. The risk variant of the Ser9Gly polymorphism of the dopamine receptor D3 (DRD3) is linked to increased dopamine affinity in the limbic striatum. With this in mind, we investigated how ICB expression is explained by apathy and DRD3 polymorphisms and their effects on grey matter volume and dopamine synthesis capacity. Fifty-four patients with early Parkinson’s disease took part in anatomical T1-weighted MRI. Forty of them also underwent dynamic PET imaging using [18F]DOPA to measure striatal dopamine synthesis capacity. Further, Ser9Gly (rs6280) gene polymorphism influencing the DRD3 dopamine-binding affinity was determined in all patients. The severity of impulsive-compulsive behaviour and apathy was assessed using the Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders Rating Scale and the Apathy Evaluation Scale. ICB and the severity of apathy were indeed positively correlated. Apathy and the DRD3 polymorphism were interactive risk factors for ICB severity. Apathy was significantly linked to atrophy of the bilateral putamen. Patients with the DRD3 risk type had reduced dopamine synthesis capacity in the putamen and limbic striatum, apathy was associated with reduced dopamine synthesis capacity in the limbic striatum. The results of [18F]DOPA reached only trend significance. Apathy in drug-naïve PD patients might be a consequence of impaired striatal dopaminergic tone. This may represent a predisposing factor for the development of ICB after the initiation of dopamine replacement therapy. The risk type of DRD3 could further amplify this predisposition due to its higher affinity to dopamine.

Abstract Background Previous cross-sectional and longitudinal observational studies revealed positive relationships between contextual built environment components and walking behavior. Due to severe restrictions during COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns, physical activity was primarily performed within the immediate living area. Using this unique opportunity, we evaluated whether built environment components were associated with the magnitude of change in walking activity in adults during COVID-19 restrictions. Methods Data on self-reported demographic characteristics and walking behaviour were extracted from the prospective longitudinal Lifelines Cohort Study in the Netherlands of participants ≥ 18 years. For our analyses, we made use of the data acquired between 2014–2017 (n = 100,285). A fifth of the participants completed the questionnaires during COVID-19 restrictive policies in July 2021 (n = 20,806). Seven spatial components were calculated for a 500m and 1650m Euclidean buffer per postal code area in GIS: population density, retail and service destination density, land use mix, street connectivity, green space density, sidewalk density, and public transport stops. Additionally, the walkability index (WI) of these seven components was calculated. Using multivariable linear regression analyses, we analyzed the association between the WI (and separate components) and the change in leisure walking minutes/week. Included demographic variables were age, gender, BMI, education, net income, occupation status, household composition and the season in which the questionnaire was filled in. Results The average leisure walking time strongly increased by 127 min/week upon COVID-19 restrictions. All seven spatial components of the WI were significantly associated with an increase in leisure walking time; a 10% higher score in the individual spatial component was associated with 5 to 8 more minutes of leisure walking/week. Green space density at the 500m Euclidean buffer and side-walk density at the 1650m Euclidean buffer were associated with the highest increase in leisure walking time/week. Subgroup analysis revealed that the built environment showed its strongest impact on leisure walking time in participants not engaging in leisure walking before the COVID-19 pandemic, compared to participants who already engaged in leisure walking before the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions These results provide strong evidence that the built environment, corrected for individual-level characteristics, directly links to changes observed in leisure walking time during COVID-19 restrictions. Since this relation was strongest in those who did not engage in leisure walking before the COVID-19 pandemic, our results encourage new perspectives in health promotion and urban planning.