Search

Purpose: Meniscal lesions are commonly associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. Meniscal repair, when possible, is widely accepted as the standard of care. Despite advancements in surgical and rehabilitation techniques, meniscal repair may impact muscle recovery when performed in conjunction with ACL reconstruction. The objective of this study was to explore if meniscal repairs in the context of ACL reconstruction affected muscle recovery compared to isolated ACL reconstruction. Methods: Fifty-nine patients with isolated ACL reconstruction were compared to 35 patients with ACL reconstruction with an associated meniscal repair. All ACL reconstructions were performed using hamstring grafts with screw-interference graft fixation. Isokinetic muscle testing was performed between six and eight months of follow-up. Muscle recovery between both groups was compared. A further subgroup analysis was performed to compare muscle recovery function of gender and meniscal tear location. Tegner scores were assessed at six months’ follow-up. Results: No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding muscle recovery. No difference in muscle recovery was found concerning gender. Lesion of both menisci significantly increased the deficit of hamstrings muscular strength at 60°/s compared to a lesion of one meniscus (26.7% ± 15.2 vs. 18.1% ± 13.5, p = 0.018) and in eccentric test (32.4% ± 26.2 vs. 18.1% ± 13.5, p = 0.040). No significant differences were found concerning the Tegner score. Conclusion: Meniscal repairs performed during an ACL reconstruction do not impact muscle recovery at 6–8 months post-operatively compared to an isolated ACL reconstruction. However, reparations of both menisci appear to impact hamstring muscle recovery negatively. Level of evidence: III, Retrospective cohort study

Background: Tibial deflexion osteotomy (TDO) is sometimes indicated for revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in knees with posterior tibial slope (PTS) ≥12° and aims to decrease PTS to around 5°. When planning TDO, measuring the anterior tibial metaphyseal height (aHt) could help ascertain whether the available metaphyseal bone would be sufficient to create the wedge and leave adequate residual bone. Purpose: To (1) determine whether, compared with knees with normal native PTS (<12°), aHt is greater in knees with excessive native PTS (≥12°), and (2) verify if, aiming to decrease PTS to 5°, supratuberosity TDO in knees with excessive native PTS could be performed without tibial tuberosity osteotomy, leaving a minimum of 15 mm of residual bone for fixation staples or plates. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: True lateral radiographs of 350 consecutive patients scheduled for ACL reconstruction were digitized to measure PTS, tibial medial plateau length, tibial anterior and posterior metaphyseal heights and inclinations, and patellar height. Measurements were compared between knees with PTS <12° and those with ≥12°. The wedge height required for supratuberosity TDO was estimated for knees with excessive PTS, aiming for a target PTS of 5°, to determine the proportion of knees that would have residual aHt <15 mm. Results: A total of 326 knees had adequate true lateral radiographs. The mean PTS was 9.8°± 3.1° (range, 1°-20°) and exceeded 12° in 83 (25%) knees. There were no significant differences between knees with normal versus excessive PTS when comparing aHt (30.7 ± 4.5 mm vs 31.6 ± 4.9 mm; P =.270) and medial tibial plateau length (43.1 ± 5.4 mm vs 43.3 ± 5.6 mm; P =.910). Setting the target mPTS at 5° for supratuberosity TDO, the mean residual aHt was 25.0 ± 4.4 mm, and 7 (8%) knees had a residual aHt <20 mm, of which only 1 (1%) had residual aHt <15 mm. Setting the target mPTS at 0°, the mean residual aHt was 21.3 ± 4.2 mm, and 36 (43%) knees had a residual aHt <20 mm, of which only 4 (5%) had residual aHt <15 mm. Conclusion: aHt was not significantly different between knees with normal versus excessive PTS. Estimation of the wedge height required for supratuberosity TDO to reduce excessive PTS to 5° revealed sufficient metaphyseal bone for wedge removal in all knees. Furthermore, 99% of knees would have sufficient residual bone (aHt, ≥15 mm) to accommodate fixation staples or plates, without the need for tibial tuberosity osteotomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Instability is a common complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The dual mobility cup (DMC) allows a reduction in the dislocation rate. The goal of this systematic review was to clarify the different uses and outcomes according to the indications of the cemented DMC (C-DMC). Methods: A systematic review was performed using the keywords "Cemented Dual Mobility Cup" or "Cemented Tripolar Cup" without a publication year limit. Of the 465 studies identified, only 56 were eligible for the study. Results: The overall number of C-DMC was 3452 in 3426 patients. The mean follow-up was 45.9 months (range 12–98.4). In most of the cases (74.5%) C-DMC was used in a revision setting. In 57.5% DMC was cemented directly into the bone, in 39.6% into an acetabular reinforcement and in 3.2% into a pre-existing cup. The overall dislocation rate was 2.9%. The most frequent postoperative complications were periprosthetic infections (2%); aseptic loosening (1.1%) and mechanical failure (0.5%). The overall revision rate was 4.4%. The average survival rate of C-DMC at the last follow-up was 93.5%. Conclusions: C-DMC represents an effective treatment option to limit the risk of dislocations and complications for both primary and revision surgery. C-DMC has good clinical outcomes and a low complication rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]