Search

The two cornerstones of management for Extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) are endotherapy and surgery [Porto-systemic shunts (PSS)/Mesorex bypass (MRB)]. Endotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for acute variceal bleed control and has also been used extensively for secondary prophylaxis till variceal eradication is achieved. However, long-term follow-up beyond endoscopic eradication of esophageal varices (EEEV) indicates that there are numerous delayed bleed and non bleed sequelae of EHPVO, which merit surgery as a definitive procedure to decompress the hypertensive portal venous system. While endotherapy obliterates natural porto-systemic collaterals in the gastroesophageal region, persistently raised portal pressures manifest as an increase in secondary isolated gastric varices, ectopic varices, portal hypertensive vasculopathy, issues related to massive splenomegaly, portal biliopathy, growth retardation and hence impaired quality of life (QOL). An ideal management strategy should address both bleed and non-bleed consequences of EHPVO and translate into a near normal QOL. Further, MRB has opened up new dimensions to the management philosophy of EHPVO. This review article critically evaluates the role of surgery and endotherapy based on available literature and authors' own experience.Surgery and endotherapy are complementary. However, with increasing duration of follow-up post EEEV, it is evident that there is resurgence in the role of surgery (PSS/MRB) as a single one time definitive procedure for alleviating all bleed and delayed non bleed sequelae of EHPVO.Surgery for EHPVO (PSS/MRB) should not be allowed to become a dying art and future generations of surgeons should continue to receive training in this specialized area of surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Portal vein obstruction (PVO) is a significant vascular complication after liver transplantation (LT) in pediatric patients. Current treatment strategies include percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), with or without stent placement, mesorex bypass (MRB), splenorenal shunt, mesocaval shunt, endovascular recanalization (EVR), splenic artery embolization and splenectomy. However, specific characteristics of patients undergoing intervention and selection of individual treatment and its efficacy have remained unclear. This review systematically analyzed biochemical and clinical characteristics, selection of treatment, efficacy, and post-procedural complications. We systematically searched PubMed and Embase between January 1995 and March 2021 for studies on the management of PVO after LT. We analyzed the reports for biochemical and clinical characteristics at the timing of the intervention in different patients, selection of treatment, and reported efficacies. We found 22 cohort studies with 362 patients who had the following characteristics: biliary atresia (83%), living-donor LT (85%), thrombocytopenia (73%), splenomegaly (40%), ascites (16%), or gastrointestinal bleeding (26%). The 3-year primary patency of PTA without stent placement was similar to that with stent placement (70%–80% and 43%–94%, respectively). MRB was used as an initial treatment with a 3-year patency of 75% to 100%. One study showed that 5-year primary patency of EVR was 80%. Secondary patency was 90% to 100% after 3 years in all studies with PTA alone, PTA/stent placement, and stent placement alone. This is the first review of all treatment protocols in PVO after pediatric LT. We showed that an important group of patients has severe symptoms of portal hypertension. Efficacy of all treatment modalities was high in the included studies which make them important modalities for these patients. • This is the first review of all treatment protocols in pediatric PVO patients after LT • An important group of patients has severe symptoms of portal hypertension (16% ascites and 26% gastrointestinal bleeding) • Secondary patency was high in all reported treatment strategies which make them an important therapeutic tools • Based on our findings, we have proposed a treatment algorithm for patients with PVO after pediatric LT [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]