Search

Background and Objectives: Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is an analgesic modality involving the insertion of a lead through an introducing needle followed by the delivery of electric current. This modality has been reported to treat chronic pain as well as postoperative pain following knee and foot surgery. However, it remains unknown if this analgesic technique may be used in ambulatory patients following upper extremity surgery. The purpose of this proof-of-concept study was to investigate various lead implantation locations and evaluate the feasibility of using percutaneous brachial plexus PNS to treat surgical pain following ambulatory rotator cuff repair in the immediate postoperative period., Methods: Preoperatively, an electrical lead (SPR Therapeutics, Cleveland, Ohio) was percutaneously implanted to target the suprascapular nerve or brachial plexus roots or trunks using ultrasound guidance. Postoperatively, subjects received 5 min of either stimulation or sham in a randomized, double-masked fashion followed by a 5 min crossover period, and then continuous stimulation until lead removal postoperative days 14-28., Results: Leads (n=2) implanted at the suprascapular notch did not appear to provide analgesia, and subsequent leads (n=14) were inserted through the middle scalene muscle and placed to target the brachial plexus. Three subjects withdrew prior to data collection. Within the recovery room, stimulation did not decrease pain scores during the first 40 min of the remaining subjects with brachial plexus leads, regardless of which treatment subjects were randomized to initially. Seven of these 11 subjects required a single-injection interscalene nerve block for rescue analgesia prior to discharge. However, subsequent average resting and dynamic pain scores postoperative days 1-14 had a median of 1 or less on the Numeric Rating Scale, and opioid requirements averaged less than 1 tablet daily with active stimulation. Two leads dislodged during use and four fractured on withdrawal, but no infections, nerve injuries, or adverse sequelae were reported., Conclusions: This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that ultrasound-guided percutaneous PNS of the brachial plexus is feasible for ambulatory shoulder surgery, and although analgesia immediately following surgery does not appear to be as potent as local anesthetic-based peripheral nerve blocks, the study suggests that this modality may provide analgesia and decrease opioid requirements in the days following rotator cuff repair. Therefore, it suggests that a subsequent, large, randomized clinical trial with an adequate control group is warranted to further investigate this therapy in the management of surgical pain in the immediate postoperative period. However, multiple technical issues remain to be resolved, such as the optimal lead location, insertion technique, and stimulating protocol, as well as preventing lead dislodgment and fracture., Trial Registration Number: NCT02898103., Competing Interests: Competing interests: The University of California San Diego has received funding from SPR Therapeutics for other research studies of BMI, JJF, RAG, ETS, WBA, BK, JFS, MWS, PJ, DCC, and CMR., (© American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ.)

Case: Electronic cigarettes are an increasingly popular and poorly regulated alternative to traditional cigarettes that deliver nicotine and other aerosolized substances to the user via a battery-powered atomizer. We report a case in which an electronic cigarette explosion resulted in a high-pressure injection injury of the finger., Conclusion: Explosions involving electronic cigarettes and similar handheld products should be treated as high-pressure injection injuries until proven otherwise. Radiographs are indispensable in the workup of these injuries. Because the true content of injected material cannot be determined with certainty, we recommend immediate surgical debridement, intravenous antibiotics, and close follow-up to observe the evolution of the injury.

Background and Purpose: Caring for frail older adults is a significant healthcare concern as the frailest 10% of the population account for over 70% of healthcare expenditures. Research reveals the use of comprehensive models, such as Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE), leads to improved functional outcomes for participants and cost savings through decreased utilization. This study examines how closing a PACE program impacts health outcomes of previously enrolled participants., Methods: Data were collected every 6 months for 2 years via phone surveys on 34 former participants enrolled in the program at the time of the closure. The survey included questions regarding satisfaction with care, activities of daily living (ADLs), instrumental ADLs (IADLs), emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and use of home health services. Deaths and nursing home placements were monitored. Outcomes were compared during and post-PACE., Conclusions: Higher numbers of ED visits, hospitalizations, and nursing home placements occurred post-PACE. PACE/post-PACE differences in ADL and IADL scores were not significant, nor were death rates. Higher satisfaction existed with PACE versus non-PACE care., Implications for Practice: Comprehensive care programs such as PACE are effective in reducing healthcare utilization, thus limiting costs. Further work is required to maintain, develop, and support comprehensive models similar to PACE., (©2016 American Association of Nurse Practitioners.)

We report the occurrence of a short radiolunate ligament rupture in a rock climber. To our knowledge, an isolated traumatic rupture of this ligament has not been described in the literature, and awareness of this entity allows initiation of therapy. The magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound appearances are reviewed and the mechanism of injury is discussed.

Purpose: Repair of a lacerated flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon underneath or just distal to the A4 pulley can be technically challenging, and success can be confounded by tendon triggering and scarring to the pulley. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of partial and complete A4 pulley release in the context of a lacerated and repaired FDP tendon just distal to the A4 pulley., Methods: Tendon biomechanics were tested in 6 cadaveric hands secured to a rigid frame, permitting measurement of tendon excursion, tendon force, and finger range of motion. After control testing, each finger had laceration and repair of the FDP tendon at the distal margin of the A4 pulley using a 6-strand core suture technique and epitendinous repair. Testing was then repeated after the following interventions: (1) intact A4 pulley, (2) release of the distal half of the A4 pulley, (3) complete release of the A4 pulley, and (4) continued proximal release of the sheath to the distal edge of A2 (release of C2, A3, and C1 pulleys). Release of the pulleys was performed by incision; no tissue was removed from the specimens., Results: From full extension to full flexion, average FDP tendon excursion for all intact digits was 37.9 ± 1.5 mm, and tendon repair resulted in average tendon shortening of 1.6 ± 0.4 mm. Flexion lag increased from <1 mm to >4 mm with venting of the A4 pulley, complete A4 release, and proximal sheath release, respectively. Compared to the intact state, repair of the tendon with an intact A4 pulley, release of half the A4 pulley, complete A4 release, and proximal sheath release resulted in percentage increases in work of flexion of 11.5 ± 3.1%, 0.83 ± 2.8%, 2.6 ± 2.4%, and 3.25 ± 2.2%, respectively., Conclusions: After FDP laceration and repair in the region of the A4 pulley, work of flexion did not increase by more than 3% from control conditions after partial or complete A4 pulley release, and work of flexion was significantly less than that achieved by performing a repair and leaving the A4 pulley intact., (Copyright © 2011 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Although the efficacy of single-injection supraclavicular nerve blocks is well established, no controlled study of continuous supraclavicular blocks is available, and their relative risks and benefits remain unknown. In contrast, the analgesia provided by continuous infraclavicular nerve blocks has been validated in randomized controlled trials. We therefore compared supraclavicular with infraclavicular perineural local anesthetic infusion following distal upper-extremity surgery., Methods: Preoperatively, subjects were randomly assigned to receive a brachial plexus perineural catheter in either the infraclavicular or supraclavicular location using an ultrasound-guided nonstimulating catheter technique. Postoperatively, subjects were discharged home with a portable pump (400-mL reservoir) infusing 0.2% ropivacaine (basal rate of 8 mL/hr; 4-mL bolus dose; 30-min lockout interval). Subjects were followed up by telephone on an outpatient basis. The primary outcome was the average pain score on the day after surgery., Results: Sixty subjects were enrolled, with 31 and 29 randomized to receive an infraclavicular and supraclavicular catheter, respectively. All perineural catheters were successfully placed per protocol. Because of protocol violations and missing data, an intention-to-treat analysis was not used; rather, only subjects with catheters in situ and whom we were able to contact were included in the analyses. The day after surgery, subjects in the infraclavicular group reported average pain as median of 2.0 (10th-90th percentiles, 0.5-6.0) compared with 4.0 (10th-90th percentiles, 0.6-7.7) in the supraclavicular group (P = 0.025). Similarly, least pain scores (numeric rating scale) on postoperative day 1 were lower in the infraclavicular group compared with the supraclavicular group (0.5 [10th-90th percentiles, 0.0-3.5] vs 2.0 [10th-90th percentiles, 0.0-4.7], respectively; P = 0.040). Subjects in the infraclavicular group required less rescue oral analgesic (oxycodone, in milligrams) for breakthrough pain in the 18 to 24 hrs after surgery compared with the supraclavicular group (0.0 [10th-90th percentiles, 0.0-5.0] vs 5.0 [10th-90th percentiles, 0.0-15.0], respectively; P = 0.048). There were no statistically significant differences in other secondary outcomes., Conclusions: A local anesthetic infusion via an infraclavicular perineural catheter provides superior analgesia compared with a supraclavicular perineural catheter.

Objective: Compared to the well-established stimulating catheter technique, the use of ultrasound guidance alone for interscalene perineural catheter insertion is a recent development and has not yet been examined in a randomized fashion. We hypothesized that an ultrasound-guided technique would require less time and produce equivalent results compared to electrical stimulation (ES) when trainees attempt interscalene perineural catheter placement., Methods: Preoperatively, patients receiving an interscalene perineural catheter for shoulder surgery were randomly assigned to an insertion protocol using either ultrasound guidance with a nonstimulating catheter or ES with a stimulating catheter. The primary outcome was the procedural duration (in minutes), starting when the ultrasound probe (ultrasound group) or catheter insertion needle (ES group) first touched the patient and ending when the catheter insertion needle was removed after catheter insertion., Results: All ultrasound-guided catheters (n = 20) were placed successfully and resulted in surgical anesthesia versus 85% of ES-guided catheters (n = 20; P = .231). Perineural catheters placed by ultrasound (n = 20) took a median (10th-90th percentiles) of 8.0 (5.0-15.5) minutes compared to 14.0 (5.0-30.0) minutes for ES (n = 20; P = .022). All catheters placed according to the protocol in both treatment groups resulted in a successful nerve block; however, 1 patient in the ES group had local anesthetic spread to the epidural space. There was 1 vascular puncture using ultrasound guidance compared to 5 in the ES-guided catheter group (P = .182)., Conclusions: Trainees using a new ultrasound-guided technique can place inter-scalene perineural catheters in less time compared to a well-documented technique using ES with a stimulating catheter and can produce equivalent results.

Objective: Electrical stimulation (ES)- and ultrasound-guided placement techniques have been described for infraclavicular brachial plexus perineural catheters but to our knowledge have never been previously compared in a randomized fashion, leaving the optimal method undetermined. We tested the hypothesis that infraclavicular catheters placed via ultrasound guidance alone require less time for placement and produce equivalent results compared with catheters placed solely via ES., Methods: Preoperatively, patients receiving an infraclavicular perineural catheter for distal upper extremity surgery were randomly assigned to either ES with a stimulating catheter or ultrasound guidance with a nonstimulating catheter. The primary outcome was the catheter insertion duration (minutes) starting when the ultrasound transducer (ultrasound group) or catheter placement needle (stimulation group) first touched the patient and ending when the catheter placement needle was removed after catheter insertion., Results: Perineural catheters placed with ultrasound guidance took a median (10th-90th percentile) of 9.0 (6.0-13.2) minutes compared with 15.0 (4.9-30.0) minutes for stimulation (P < .01). All ultrasound-guided catheters were successfully placed according to the protocol (n = 20) versus 70% in the stimulation group (n = 20; P < .01). All ultrasound-guided catheters resulted in a successful surgical block, whereas 2 catheters placed by stimulation failed to result in surgical anesthesia. Six catheters (30%) placed via stimulation resulted in vascular punctures compared with none in the ultrasound group (P < .01). Procedure-related pain scores were similar between groups (P = .34)., Conclusions: Placement of infraclavicular perineural catheters takes less time, is more often successful, and results in fewer inadvertent vascular punctures when using ultrasound guidance compared with ES.

Purpose: Metacarpal fractures are common in hand surgery. Metacarpal shortening ranging from 2 mm to as much as 10 mm has been deemed acceptable in the literature. We examined the effect of metacarpal shortening on interosseous muscle architecture and predicted force production capacity based on the standard muscle length-tension curve (commonly known as the Blix curve)., Methods: The dorsal interosseous muscles between the middle and ring finger metacarpals from 9 adult human cadaver hands were exposed and studied. The ring finger metacarpal was translated proximally in 2-mm increments in relation to a stationary middle finger metacarpal. Digital images were obtained and analyzed to define the length and orientation of individual muscle fibers with each incremental change in position., Results: Interosseous muscle fiber length increased and pennation angle decreased uniformly with increasing proximal translation of the ring finger metacarpal. At 10 mm of shortening the fiber length had increased to 20.8 +/- 1.8 mm, or to approximately 125% of optimum fiber length, and the pennation angle had decreased to 6.7 degrees +/- 2.2 degrees or by approximately 50%., Conclusions: The interosseous muscles have been shown to have a high fiber-to-muscle length ratio. This ratio indicates that these muscles function optimally over a short range of lengths, leaving them vulnerable to derangement in function owing to alteration in the surrounding bony architecture. Based on the standard muscle length--tension relationship we had predicted a steady linear decrease in interosseous power with proximal translation of the metacarpal. The results indicate an initial linear progression with a plateau at approximately 8 mm of shortening. At 2 mm of shortening there is an approximately 8% loss of power generation, at 10 mm of metacarpal shortening we predict the interosseous muscle to be capable of only approximately 55% of its optimum power compared with the resting position.

Clinicians have long noted substantial variation in the cross-sectional size of flexor tendons in the hand; however, data indicating that surgical repair techniques of lacerated flexor tendons should be altered according to size are unavailable. Our objectives were to evaluate the cross-sectional size differences among tendons within the same hand and to correlate tendon size with tensile mechanical properties after suture repair. Fifty human cadaver flexor digitorum profundus tendons were measured with digital calipers to determine radioulnar and volardorsal diameters. Twenty tendons were used to measure resistance to suture pull-through; tendons were transected at the A2 pulley, and a transverse double-stranded 4-0 Supramid suture (S. Jackson, Inc, Alexandria, VA) was passed through the radioulnar plane of the tendon 1 cm from the transection site. The remaining tendons were transected and repaired by using a modified Kessler repair with double-stranded 4-0 Supramid suture. Both tendon repairs and tendon-suture pull-through specimens were tested to failure in tension by using a material testing machine. Dorsovolar tendon height and tendon cross-sectional area varied significantly between digits, with an average difference of approximately 40% between the values of the smallest (fifth) and largest (third) fingers. Yield and ultimate force determined by pull-through tests of the simple transverse suture correlated positively with tendon radioulnar width. Tensile properties of tendons repaired with a double-stranded modified Kessler repair, however, did not depend significantly on tendon size. These results indicate that the strength of the commonly used Kessler suture technique is not dependent on tendon cross-sectional size within the clinically relevant range of tendons evaluated.