Search

Background Adverse cardiac remodeling is a major risk factor for the development of post myocardial infarction (MI) heart failure (HF). This study investigates the effects of the chymase inhibitor fulacimstat on adverse cardiac remodeling after acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial patients with first STEMI were eligible. To preferentially enrich patients at high risk of adverse remodeling, main inclusion criteria were a left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤45% and an infarct size >10% on day 5 to 9 post MI as measured by cardiac MRI. Patients were then randomized to 6 months treatment with either 25 mg fulacimstat (n = 54) or placebo (n = 53) twice daily on top of standard of care starting day 6 to 12 post MI. The changes in LVEF, LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI), and LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVI) from baseline to 6 months were analyzed by a central blinded cardiac MRI core laboratory. Results Fulacimstat was safe and well tolerated and achieved mean total trough concentrations that were approximately tenfold higher than those predicted to be required for minimal therapeutic activity. Comparable changes in LVEF (fulacimstat: 3.5% ± 5.4%, placebo: 4.0% ± 5.0%, P = .69), LVEDVI (fulacimstat: 7.3 ± 13.3 mL/m2, placebo: 5.1 ± 18.9 mL/m2, P = .54), and LVESVI (fulacimstat: 2.3 ± 11.2 mL/m2, placebo: 0.6 ± 14.8 mL/m2, P = .56) were observed in both treatment arms. Conclusion Fulacimstat was safe and well tolerated in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction (LVD) after first STEMI but had no effect on cardiac remodeling.

The chymase inhibitor fulacimstat is developed as a first-in-class treatment option for the inhibition of adverse cardiac remodeling in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) after acute myocardial infarction (MI). The aim of the study was to examine the safety and tolerability of fulacimstat in patients with LVD after remote MI. A multicenter, multinational randomized, placebo-controlled study was performed in clinically stable patients (40–79 years of age, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 45% because of MI in medical history) who were on stable evidence-based standard-of-care therapies for LVD post-MI including an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker at doses of at least half the recommended target dose. Patients were treated for 2 weeks with either placebo (n = 12) or 4 different doses of fulacimstat (5 mg twice daily, n = 9; 10 mg twice daily, n = 9; 25 mg twice daily, n = 10; 50 mg once daily, n = 9). Fulacimstat was safe and well tolerated at all examined doses. There were no clinically relevant effects on vital signs or potassium levels compared with placebo treatment. Mean plasma concentrations of fulacimstat increased with the administered dose and reached exposures predicted to be therapeutically active. The safety profile and the absence of effects on blood pressure or heart rate in a chronic patient population having similar comorbidities and receiving similar comedication as patients after acute MI support future clinical trials with fulacimstat in patients after acute MI.

Background The protease chymase generates multiple factors involved in tissue remodelling including angiotensin II (Ang II) and has been implicated in the pathophysiology of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). This study investigated the effects of the chymase inhibitor fulacimstat on albuminuria in patients with Type II diabetes mellitus and a clinical diagnosis of DKD. Methods In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, patients were on the maximum tolerated dose of either an Ang II receptor blocker or an Ang-converting enzyme inhibitor since at least 3 months before the screening visit. Eligible patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to treatment with either 25 mg fulacimstat (n = 99) or placebo (n = 48) twice daily on top of standard of care. Results The randomized patients had a mean urine albumin–creatinine ratio (UACR) of 131 mg/g (range: 29–2429 mg) and a mean (standard deviation) estimated glomerular filtration rate of 60.8 ± 16.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 before treatment start. Fulacimstat was safe and well tolerated, and achieved mean total trough concentrations that were ∼9-fold higher than those predicted to be required for minimal therapeutic activity. UACR increased by 27.4% [coefficient of variation (CV) 86%] and 3% (CV 88.9%) after 24 weeks of treatment with placebo or fulacimstat, respectively. Analysis of covariance revealed a least square mean UACR ratio (fulacimstat/placebo) of 0.804 (90% CI 0.627–1.030, P = 0.1477), indicating a statistically non-significant UACR reduction of 19.6% after fulacimstat treatment compared with placebo. Conclusions Fulacimstat was safe and well tolerated but did not reduce albuminuria in patients with DKD. These findings do not support a therapeutic role for chymase inhibition in DKD.

Aim Regorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor under investigation for use in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. In this phase I study, regorafenib eye drops were administered to healthy volunteers to provide information on safety, tolerability and systemic exposure. Methods This was a single-centre, randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, dose-escalation, placebo-controlled study. Subjects received regorafenib eye drops (30 mg ml-1 , 25 μl) as a 0.75 mg single dose (Cohort 1), 0.75 mg twice daily (bid) or thrice daily (tid) over 14 days (Cohorts 2 and 3, respectively), 1.5 mg tid unilaterally for 3 days, then bilaterally for up to 14 days (Cohort 4), or placebo. Plasma samples were taken to estimate systemic exposure. Safety and functional assessments were performed throughout the study. Results Thirty-six subjects received regorafenib and 12 received placebo. Regorafenib was safe and well tolerated over the dose range. No pathological changes occurred in the anterior, vitreous or posterior eye compartments. Mild eyelid redness, oedema and conjunctival hyperaemia were observed across all regorafenib cohorts; these were comparable with the effects seen with placebo. Predominant symptoms were blurred vision in the active and placebo groups. Systemic safety evaluations showed no clinically relevant findings. Absolute systemic exposure after multiple administrations of regorafenib eye drops at a dose of 0.75 mg was 600-700-fold lower than after multiple oral administration of 160 mg day-1 , the dose approved in cancer indications. Conclusion These results indicate a favourable safety and tolerability profile of regorafenib eye drops up to 30 mg ml-1 tid for use in clinical studies.

Essentials In this crossover study the anticoagulant effects of rivaroxaban and apixaban were compared. Healthy volunteers received rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily or apixaban 5 mg twice daily. Rivaroxaban was associated with more prolonged inhibition of thrombin generation than apixaban. Rivaroxaban induced a clear prolongation of prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time. SummaryBackground The anticoagulant actions of the oral direct activated factor Xa inhibitors, rivaroxaban and apixaban, have not previously been directly compared. Objectives To compare directly the steady-state pharmacokinetics and anticoagulant effects of rivaroxaban and apixaban at doses approved for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Methods Twenty-four healthy Caucasian male volunteers were included in this open-label, two-period crossover, phase 1 study (EudraCT number: 2015-002612-32). Volunteers were randomized to receive rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily or apixaban 5 mg twice daily for 7 days, followed by a washout period of at least 7 days before they received the other treatment. Plasma concentrations and anticoagulant effects were measured at steady state and after drug discontinuation. Results Overall exposure was similar for both drugs: the geometric mean area under the plasma concentration–time curve for the 0–24-h interval was 1830 μg h L−1 for rivaroxaban and 1860 μg h L−1 for apixaban. Rivaroxaban was associated with greater inhibition of endogenous thrombin potential (geometric mean area under the curve relative to baseline during the 0–24-h interval: 15.5 h versus 17.5 h) and a more pronounced maximal prolongation relative to baseline of prothrombin time (PT) (1.66-fold versus 1.14-fold) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) (1.43-fold versus 1.16-fold) at steady state than apixaban. Conclusions Despite similar exposure to both drugs, rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily was associated with greater and more sustained inhibition of thrombin generation than apixaban 5 mg twice daily. Sensitive PT and APTT assays can be used to estimate the anticoagulant effects of rivaroxaban.

Introduction Adverse cardiac remodelling represents the most important risk factor for the development of heart failure (HF) after myocardial infarction (MI). Chymase is a protease that generates locally pro-fibrotic factors such as angiotensin II, TGFβ, and matrixmetallproteases that contribute to tissue remodelling. Purpose This phase IIa study examined the effects of the chymase inhibitor fulacimstat on functional parameters of adverse cardiac remodelling after acute MI. Methods A double-blind, multinational, randomized, placebo-controlled study was performed in patients after first STEMI who were treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention within 24h of symptom onset. To enrich for patients at risk of adverse remodelling, main inclusion criteria were a left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)≤45% and an infarct size>10% on day 5 to 9 post MI as measured by cardiac MRI. On day 6 to 12 post MI, patients were randomized to treatment with either 25 mg fulacimstat (n=54) or placebo (n=53) twice daily on top of standard of care. The changes in LVEF, LVEDVI, and LVESVI from baseline to 6 months of treatment were analyzed by a central blinded cardiac MRI core laboratory. Results Fulacimstat was safe and well tolerated, 64.8% of patients treated with fulacimstat and 75.5% of patients treated with placebo reported treatment emergent adverse events. Fulacimstat achieved exposures that were approximately 10-fold higher than those predicted to be required for minimal therapeutic activity. After six months of treatment, there were no effects of fulacimstat compared to placebo on the changes in LVEF, LVEDVI, and LVESVI (see Table). Analysis of primary efficacy parameters Parameter Placebo Fulacimstat p-value LVEF (%) baseline 37.2±6.1 39.1±5.5 0.15 6 months 41.2±8.4 42.6±8.4 0.45 delta 4.0±5.0 3.5±5.4 0.69 LVEDVI (mL/m2) baseline 80.0±17.1 77.4±18.2 0.51 6 months 85.1±19.1 84.7±23.4 0.94 delta 5.1±18.9 7.3±13.3 0.54 LVESVI (mL/m2) baseline 50.5±13.0 47.3±12.3 0.26 6 months 51.1±16.9 49.6±18.1 0.71 delta 0.6±14.8 2.3±11.2 0.56 Data are given as mean ± standard deviation. Conclusion Fulacimstat was safe and well tolerated in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction (LVD) after first STEMI but had no effect on adverse cardiac remodelling in the experimental setting of this study. Acknowledgement/Funding The study was funded by its sponsor BAYER AG

Background Rivaroxaban has been shown to be efficacious for treatment of venous thromboembolism in adults, and has a reduced risk of bleeding compared with standard anticoagulants. We aimed to develop paediatric rivaroxaban regimens for the treatment of venous thromboembolism in children and adolescents. Methods In this phase 2 programme, we did three studies to evaluate rivaroxaban treatment in children younger than 6 months, aged 6 months to 5 years, and aged 6-17 years. Our studies used a multicentre, single-arm design at 54 sites in Australia, Europe, Israel, Japan, and north America. We included children with objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism previously treated with low-molecular weight heparin, fondaparinux, or a vitamin K antagonist for at least 2 months or, in children who had catheter-related venous thromboembolism for at least 6 weeks. We administered rivaroxaban orally in a bodyweight-adjusted 20 mg-equivalent dose, based on physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling predictions and EINSTEIN-Jr phase 1 data in young adults, in either a once-daily (tablets; for those aged 6-17 years), twice-daily (in suspension; for those aged 6 months to 11 years), or three times-daily (in suspension; for those younger than 6 months) dosing regimen for 30 days (or 7 days for those younger than 6 months). The primary aim was to define rivaroxaban treatment regimens that match the target adult exposure range. The principal safety outcome was major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. Analyses were per-protocol. The predefined efficacy outcomes were symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism, asymptomatic deterioration on repeat imaging at the end of the study treatment period. These trials are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT02564718, NCT02309411, and NCT02234843. Findings Between Feb 11, 2013, and Dec 20, 2017, we enrolled 93 children (ten children younger than 6 months; 15 children aged 6 months to 1 year; 25 children aged 2-5 years; 32 children aged 6-11 years; and 11 children aged 12-17 years) into our study. 89 (96%) children completed study treatment (30 days of treatment, or 7 days in those younger than 6 months), and 93 (100%) children received at least one dose of study treatment and were evaluable for the primary endpoints. None of the children had a major bleed, and four (4%, 95% CI 1.2-10.6) of these children had a clinically relevant non-major bleed (three children aged 12-17 years with menorrhagia and one child aged 6-11 years with gingival bleeding). We found no symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism in any patients (0%, 0.0-3.9). 24 (32%) of 75 patients with repeat imaging had their thrombotic burden resolved, 43 (57%) patients improved, and eight (11%) patients were unchanged. No patient deteriorated. We confirmed therapeutic rivaroxaban exposures with once-daily dosing in children with bodyweights of at least 30 kg and with twice-daily dosing in children with bodyweights of at least 20 kg and less than 30 kg. Children with low bodyweights (

Background The EINSTEIN-Jr program will evaluate rivaroxaban for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in children, targeting exposures similar to the 20 mg once-daily dose for adults. Methods This was a multinational, single-dose, open-label, phase I study to describe the pharmacodynamics (PD), pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of a single bodyweight-adjusted rivaroxaban dose in children aged 0.5–18 years. Children who had completed treatment for a venous thromboembolic event were enrolled into four age groups (0.5–2 years, 2–6 years, 6–12 years and 12–18 years) receiving rivaroxaban doses equivalent to 10 mg or 20 mg (either as a tablet or oral suspension). Blood samples for PK and PD analyses were collected within specified time windows. Results Fifty-nine children were evaluated. In all age groups, PD parameters (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time and anti-Factor Xa activity) showed a linear relationship versus rivaroxaban plasma concentrations and were in line with previously acquired adult data, as well as in vitro spiking experiments. The rivaroxaban pediatric physiologically based pharmacokinetic model, used to predict the doses for the individual body weight groups, was confirmed. No episodes of bleeding were reported, and treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in four children and all resolved during the study. Conclusions Bodyweight-adjusted, single-dose rivaroxaban had predictable PK/PD profiles in children across all age groups from 0.5 to 18 years. The PD assessments based on prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time demonstrated that the anticoagulant effect of rivaroxaban was not affected by developmental hemostasis in children. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01145859.

The orally available chymase inhibitor BAY 1142524 is currently being developed as a first-in-class treatment for left-ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Results from 3 randomized, single-center, phase 1 studies in healthy male volunteers examining the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of BAY 1142524 are summarized. In this first-in-human study, single oral doses of 1-200 mg were administered in fasted state as liquid service formulation or immediate release (IR) tablets. The relative bioavailability and the effect of a high-fat/high-calorie meal were investigated at the 5-mg dose. In a multiple-dose escalation study, doses of 5-50 mg twice daily and 100 mg once daily were given for 5 consecutive days. BAY 1142524 was safe and well tolerated and had no effects on heart rate or blood pressure compared with placebo. BAY 1142524 was absorbed with peak concentration 1-3 hours after administration for IR tablets; it was eliminated from plasma with a terminal half-life of 6.84-12.0 hours after administration of liquid service formulation or IR tablets. Plasma exposures appeared to be dose-linear, with a negligible food effect. There was only low accumulation of BAY 1142524 after multiple dosing. BAY 1142524 exhibited a pharmacokinetic profile allowing for once-daily dosing. The absence of blood pressure effects after administration of BAY 1142524 supports the combination of this novel anti-remodeling drug with existing standard of care in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction.

Aims This study investigated relevant pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic parameters during the transition from warfarin to rivaroxaban in healthy male subjects. Methods Ninety-six healthy men were randomized into the following three groups: warfarin [international normalized ratio (INR) 2.0–3.0] transitioned to rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily (od; group A); warfarin (INR 2.0–3.0) followed by placebo od (group B); and rivaroxaban alone 20 mg od (group C) for 4 days. Anti-factor Xa activity, inhibition of factor Xa activity, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time, HepTest, prothrombinase-induced clotting time, factor VIIa activity, factor IIa activity, endogenous thrombin potential and pharmacokinetics were measured. Results An additive effect was observed on the PT and PT/INR during the initial transition period. The mean maximal prolongation of PT was 4.39-fold [coefficient of variation (CV) 18.03%; range 3.39–6.50] of the baseline value in group A, compared with 1.88-fold (CV 10.35%; range 1.53–2.21) in group B and 1.57-fold (CV 9.98%; range 1.37–2.09) in group C. Rivaroxaban had minimal influence on the PT/INR at trough levels. Inhibition of factor Xa activity, activated partial thromboplastin time and endogenous thrombin potential were also enhanced, but to a lesser extent. In contrast, the effects of rivaroxaban on anti-factor Xa activity, HepTest and prothrombinase-induced clotting time were not affected by pretreatment with warfarin. Conclusions Changes in pharmacodynamics during the transition from warfarin to rivaroxaban vary depending on the test used. A supra-additive effect on PT/INR is expected during the initial period of transition, but pretreatment with warfarin does not influence the effect of rivaroxaban on anti-factor Xa activity.

Background: Gene therapy for hemophilia A has the potential to reduce the treatment burden for care-providers and patients, by eliminating the need for regular factor VIII (FVIII) prophylaxis through the long-term expression of endogenous FVIII at levels sufficient to provide bleed protection. BAY 2599023 (AAVhu37FVIII) is a non-replicating adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector, based on the AAV serotype hu37, which contains a single-stranded DNA genome encoding a B-domain deleted FVIII, under the control of a liver-specific promotor/enhancer combination optimized for transgenic expression. The AAVhu37 capsid is a member of the hepatotropic Clade E family and has been selected based on nonclinical studies demonstrating efficient liver-directed FVIII gene transfer, favorable biodistribution as well as durable FVIII expression. BAY 2599023 is the first clinical-stage AAV gene therapy vector based on the AAVhu37 serotype. This analysis reports safety and FVIII activity following a single intravenous infusion of BAY 2599023 in the first-dose cohort of a phase I/II open-label, first time in human dose-finding study (NCT03588299) of previously treated, severe hemophilia A patients. Patients/Methods: Two participants were enrolled sequentially; each received a single infusion of AAVhu37 (0.5 x 1013 GC/kg). Patients were males ≥18 years with no history of FVIII inhibitor development, no detectable immunity to the AAVhu37 capsid, and >150 exposure days to FVIII products. Primary endpoints were adverse events (AEs), serious AEs and AEs/SAEs of special interest (S/AESI); the secondary endpoint was change in FVIII activity from baseline. Informed patient consent, and ethics committee approval at each local site, were obtained. Results: Following more than 15 weeks of safety observation, no SAEs, AEs related to study drug, nor S/AESI were reported. Liver enzymes (alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase) remained Conclusions: BAY 2599023 was previously shown in non-clinical studies to have a good safety profile, with the potential to achieve endogenous expression of FVIII at therapeutic levels, over an extended period of time. In this first-in-human clinical study with BAY 2599023, two patients have been treated with BAY 2599023 at the starting dose of 0.5 x 1013 GC/kg and no safety concerns have been reported to date. Measurable expression of endogenous FVIII and an early read-out of hemostatic efficacy have been demonstrated in both patients. Overall, data generated from this first dose cohort demonstrate that successful translation from pre-clinical to clinical development and proof-of-mechanism for BAY 2599023 was achieved. Disclosures Pipe: HEMA Biologics: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Freeline: Consultancy; Apcintex: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Catalyst Bioscience: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; uniQure: Consultancy; BioMarin: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Spark Therapeutics: Consultancy. Becka:Bayer: Employment. Detering:Bayer: Employment. Vanevski:Bayer: Employment. Lissitchkov:Octapharma: Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Other: Principal investigator for clinical trials, Research Funding; Sobi: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Honoraria; Sanofi: Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: Gene therapy for haemophilia treatment.

Rivaroxaban is an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor that targets free and clot-bound Factor Xa and Factor Xa in the prothrombinase complex. It is absorbed rapidly, with maximum plasma concentrations being reached 2-4 h after tablet intake. Oral bioavailability is high (80-100 %) for the 10 mg tablet irrespective of food intake and for the 15 mg and 20 mg tablets when taken with food. Variability in the pharmacokinetic parameters is moderate (coefficient of variation 30-40 %). The pharmacokinetic profile of rivaroxaban is consistent in healthy subjects and across a broad range of different patient populations studied. Elimination of rivaroxaban from plasma occurs with a terminal half-life of 5-9 h in healthy young subjects and 11-13 h in elderly subjects. Rivaroxaban produces a pharmacodynamic effect that is closely correlated with its plasma concentration. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relationship for inhibition of Factor Xa activity can be described by an E max model, and prothrombin time prolongation by a linear model. Rivaroxaban does not inhibit cytochrome P450 enzymes or known drug transporter systems and, because rivaroxaban has multiple elimination pathways, it has no clinically relevant interactions with most commonly prescribed medications. Rivaroxaban has been approved for clinical use in several thromboembolic disorders.

Aims The anticoagulant rivaroxaban is an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor for the management of thromboembolic disorders. Metabolism and excretion involve cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) and 2J2 (CYP2J2), CYP-independent mechanisms, and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and breast cancer resistance protein (Bcrp) (ABCG2).

Introduction Rivaroxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor, has demonstrated effectiveness for the management of both venous and arterial thrombosis. This study was designed to investigate the antithrombotic effect of rivaroxaban, with or without acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), in an ex vivo perfusion chamber at both low and high shear rates. Materials and methods Healthy subjects (N = 51) were enrolled in a randomized, crossover (rivaroxaban 5, 10 or 20 mg with or without ASA), and parallel-group (compared with ASA plus clopidogrel) study. Thrombi formed on pig aorta strips were measured after a 5-minute perfusion at low and high shear rates with blood from the subjects by measuring D-dimer concentration (for fibrin deposition) and P-selectin content (for platelet deposition). Results ASA alone had no impact on thrombus D-dimer levels, whereas rivaroxaban alone at peak concentrations decreased D-dimer levels by 9%, 84% and 65% at low shear rate and 37%, 73% and 74% at high shear rate after doses of 5, 10 and 20 mg, respectively. Steady-state ASA plus rivaroxaban 5 mg caused a greater reduction in D­dimer levels (63%) than monotherapy at low shear rate. Co-administration of ASA with clopidogrel was associated with a 30% decrease in D-dimer levels at low shear rate and a 14% decrease at high shear rate. No conclusive effect on P-selectin content was observed across the treatment groups. Conclusions Rivaroxaban dose-dependently inhibited ex vivo thrombus formation under low and high shear rates. Co-administration of ASA had an additional effect on the antithrombotic action of low-dose rivaroxaban.

Objective Doses of 10 mg, 15 mg, and 20 mg of rivaroxaban are approved for the treatment and prevention of thromboembolic disorders in adult patients. In six Phase I studies, the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg, and 20 mg rivaroxaban were investigated in healthy male subjects, and the influence of food on these parameters was investigated for the 10 mg, 15 mg, and 20 mg tablet doses. In addition, an oral suspension containing 1 mg/ml rivaroxaban, which is under investigation for future use in the pediatric population, was investigated at doses of 10 mg and 20 mg. Materials Rivaroxaban was obtained from Bayer Pharma AG, Wuppertal, Germany. Methods Six independent, single-dose, cross-over studies were performed in healthy male subjects (between 13 and 24 subjects were enrolled in each study) to determine the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of rivaroxaban under fasting and fed conditions. Study 1 was an absolute bioavailability study that compared 5 mg and 20 mg tablet doses with a 1 mg intravenous solution. Studies 2 and 3 were confirmatory food-effect studies that assessed 10 mg and 20 mg tablet doses, respectively, under fed and fasting conditions. Study 4 was a formulation study that evaluated oral suspensions of 10 mg (fasting) and 20 mg (fasting and fed) rivaroxaban vs. a 10 mg tablet (fasted). Study 5 was a dose-proportionality study that assessed 2.5 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg tablets under fasting conditions. Study 6 was a dose-proportionality study that assessed tablet doses of 10 mg, 15 mg, and 20 mg under fed conditions. Pharmacokinetic parameters, including the area under the plasma concentration-time curve after a single dose, the maximum drug concentration in plasma after a single dose, dose-adjusted values of area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximum drug concentration in plasma after a single dose, half-life associated with the terminal slope, and time to maximum concentration in plasma after a single dose were evaluated. Adverse events were classified according to their degree of severity and were summarized using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities preferred terms. Results At all doses, rivaroxaban showed an acceptable safety profile and was well tolerated in healthy individuals. Independent of food and formulation, pharmacokinetic parameters of doses up to 10 mg rivaroxaban were dose proportional and had high oral bioavailability (≥ 80%). Under fasting conditions, pharmacokinetic parameters of 15 mg and 20 mg rivaroxaban increased with dose but were less than dose proportional. However, when taken with food, high bioavailability (≥ 80%) of these doses was achieved independent of formulation. Conclusion Pharmacokinetic parameters of doses up to 10 mg rivaroxaban were dose proportional and had high oral bioavailability independent of food or whether administered as tablet or solution. High bioavailability (≥ 80%) of 15 mg and 20 mg rivaroxaban was achieved when taken with food; therefore, these doses need to be taken with food.

Aim This study investigated the effects of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single dose of rivaroxaban (10 mg), an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor. Method This single centre, non-randomized, non-blinded study included subjects with mild (n = 8) or moderate hepatic impairment (n = 8), according to the Child–Pugh classification, and gender-matched healthy subjects (n = 16). Results Rivaroxaban was well tolerated irrespective of hepatic function. Mild hepatic impairment did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban, compared with healthy subjects. However, in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment, total body clearance was decreased, leading to a significant increase in the area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC). The least-squares (LS)-mean values for AUC were 1.15-fold [90% confidence interval (CI) 0.85, 1.57] and 2.27-fold (90% CI 1.68, 3.07) higher in subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment, respectively, than in healthy subjects. Consequently, the pharmacodynamic responses were significantly enhanced in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment. For inhibition of Factor Xa, increases in the area under the effect–time curve and the maximum effect were observed, with LS-mean ratios of 2.59 and 1.24, respectively, vs. healthy subjects. Prolongation of prothrombin time was similar in healthy subjects and those with mild hepatic impairment, but was significantly enhanced in those with moderate hepatic impairment. Conclusion Moderate (but not mild) hepatic impairment reduced total body clearance of rivaroxaban after a single 10 mg dose, leading to increased rivaroxaban exposure and pharmacodynamic effects.

A randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted to assess the effect of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban – an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor. Subjects (n = 34) were enrolled into four groups: young males or females (aged 18–45 years) and elderly males or females (aged >75 years), and received a single dose of 10 mg rivaroxaban. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were determined. Gender had no significant influence on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban. The area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) of rivaroxaban was 41% higher in elderly compared with young subjects; corresponding AUC values for the inhibition of Factor Xa activity and prolongation of prothrombin time were also higher. These changes were the result of reduced rivaroxaban clearance in elderly subjects, mainly owing to decreased renal function. The influence of age was not considered clinically relevant. The maximum plasma concentration was not increased in elderly subjects, and pharmacodynamic parameters returned close to baseline within 24 hours. The results indicate that age alone and gender did not have a clinically relevant effect on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban in healthy subjects after a 10 mg dose.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT • Prior to the commencement of this study, it was already known that rivaroxaban is partially cleared via the kidneys and an influence of renal insufficiency on rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics and exposure was anticipated. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS • As many patients in the target indications of rivaroxaban will be elderly, a precise quantitative knowledge of the influence of renal function on rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics and exposure is mandatory for adequate labelling recommendations (in the context of benefit/risk provided by phase III studies) to guide therapy. This study provided detailed insight on both rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic behaviour in renal impairment including severely renally impaired subjects. AIM This study evaluated the effects of impaired renal function on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of rivaroxaban (10 mg single dose), an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor. METHODS Subjects (n= 32) were stratified based on measured creatinine clearance: healthy controls (≥80 ml min−1), mild (50–79 ml min−1), moderate (30–49 ml min−1) and severe impairment (

The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban--a novel, oral, direct Factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor--in healthy elderly subjects.In this single-centre, single-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-escalation study, 48 subjects (aged 60-76 years) were randomized to receive a single oral dose of 30, 40 or 50 mg of rivaroxaban or placebo.Rivaroxaban was absorbed rapidly, reaching peak plasma concentration (C(max)) 4 h after dosing in all groups. Bioavailability, in terms of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and C(max), increased slightly (less than dose proportionally) after administration of rivaroxaban 40 mg compared with 30 mg, but was not increased further with rivaroxaban 50 mg. Rivaroxaban pharmacodynamic effects (inhibition of FXa activity and prolongation of prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time and HepTest) all showed a similar pattern, with maximum inhibition of FXa activity increasing from 68% after rivaroxaban 30 mg to 75% after 40 mg and no further increase with the 50 mg dose. Most adverse events were mild; observed rates were less than placebo for the 30 and 40 mg dose groups, and similar to placebo for 50 mg. No differences were found between male and female subjects. Effects of rivaroxaban doses above 50 mg were not investigated in this study.Each single dose of rivaroxaban was well tolerated, with predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics at doses up to 40 mg, and provided effective anticoagulation in healthy elderly subjects. Adverse events were somewhat elevated in the 50 mg group, but given the small sample size, no specific conclusions can be drawn about this dosing level.

Rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939) is an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor in advanced development. This study was undertaken to investigate its effects on thrombin generation. In this placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover study, 12 healthy subjects received rivaroxaban (single 5- or 30-mg dose) or placebo. Thrombin generation was investigated by measuring the endogenous thrombin potential and prothrombinase-induced clotting time. Maximal effect of rivaroxaban was observed 2 hours after drug administration: prothrombinase-induced clotting time was prolonged 1.8 and 2.3 times baseline after rivaroxaban 5 and 30 mg, respectively. Collagen-induced endogenous thrombin potential was reduced by approximately 80% and approximately 90% compared with baseline after rivaroxaban 5 and 30 mg, respectively, and tissue factor-induced endogenous thrombin potential was reduced by approximately 40% (5 mg) and approximately 65% (30 mg), respectively. Thrombin generation remained inhibited for 24 hours. There was a close correlation between plasma concentration of rivaroxaban and prolongation of prothrombinase-induced clotting time and reduction in endogenous thrombin potential. Rivaroxaban strongly inhibits platelet-induced thrombin generation, after activation of either platelets or the coagulation pathway, even in the presence of minimal factor Xa inhibition in plasma.

Objective Rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939) is an oral, direct Factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor being developed for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. This analysis aimed to define population models for the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) ofrivaroxaban in healthy males. Methods Non-linear, mixed-effect modeling was used to analyze rivaroxaban plasma concentration and PD data (FXa activity and clotting tests) from subjects in a phase I, multiple-ascending-dose study. Subjects received 5 mg rivaroxaban once, twice or three times daily, or 10, 20 or 30 mg rivaroxaban twice daily. Results The population PK of rivaroxaban were well described by an oral, two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination from the central compartment. Population mean estimates for apparent oral clearance and volume of distribution for the central compartment were 9.2 1/h and 55 1, respectively, with moderate inter-individual variability (17.4% and 30.7%, respectively). Total volume of distribution for rivaroxaban at steady state was approximately 70 1. Residual (unexplained) variability was 25%. FXa activity correlated with rivaroxaban plasma concentrations following an inhibitory Emax model; prothrombin time (PT) and rivaroxaban plasma concentrations correlated with a linear model, with a slope of 4.6 s/(100 microg/1). Inter-individual variability was low for the correlation with PT. The models derived were used to define sampling windows for population PK/PD modeling in Phase II studies. Conclusions This analysis confirms that rivaroxaban has predictable, dose-proportional PK and PD. The linear correlation between rivaroxaban plasma concentrations and PT suggests that this test might be useful to assess rivaroxaban exposure in patients, if required.

Anticoagulants are often dose adjusted, or their use restricted, in patients with extremes of body weight. Rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939) is a novel, oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor in clinical development. This was a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in healthy male and female subjects to assess the effect of extreme body weight (or = 50 kg and120 kg), and gender, on the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban 10 mg, compared with subjects of normal weight (70-80 kg). Rivaroxaban was well tolerated. Cmax of rivaroxaban was unaffected in subjects120 kg but was increased by 24% in subjects weighingor = 50 kg, resulting in a small (15%) increase in prolongation of prothrombin time, which was not considered clinically relevant. The area under the curve was unaffected by body weight or gender. No other clinically relevant differences were observed, suggesting that rivaroxaban is unlikely to require dose adjustment for body weight or gender.

Rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939) is an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor in advanced clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. This was a randomized, 2-way crossover study in healthy male subjects, with an aspirin run-in period, to examine whether aspirin influences the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban. All treatments were well tolerated; drug-related adverse events were mild and transient. Aspirin did not alter the effects of rivaroxaban on Factor Xa activity or clotting tests. Platelet aggregation and bleeding time were not affected by rivaroxaban, and rivaroxaban did not influence the effects of aspirin on these parameters to a clinically relevant extent. Aspirin did not affect the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban, including the fraction unbound. This study suggests that there is no clinically relevant interaction between rivaroxaban and aspirin and that the 2 drugs could be administered concomitantly at the doses used in this study.

There is a clinical need for safe new oral anticoagulants. The safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of BAY 59-7939—a novel, oral, direct Factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor—were investigated in this single-center, placebo-controlled, single-blind, parallel-group, multiple-dose escalation study. Healthy male subjects (aged 20–45 years, body mass index 18.6–31.4 kg/m2) received oral BAY 59-7939 (n=8 per dose regimen) or placebo (n=4 per dose regimen) on days 0 and 3–7. Dosing regimens were 5 mg once, twice (bid), or three times daily, and 10 mg, 20 mg, or 30 mg bid. There were no clinically relevant changes in bleeding time or other safety variables across all doses and regimens. There was no dose-related increase in the frequency or severity of adverse events with BAY 59-7939. Maximum inhibition of FXa activity occurred after approximately 3 h, and inhibition was maintained for at least 12 h for all doses. Prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and HepTest were prolonged to a similar extent to inhibition of FXa activity for all doses. Dose-proportional pharmacokinetics ( $${\text{AUC}}_{{\tau {\text{, norm}}}}$$ and Cmax,norm) were observed at steady state (day 7). Maximum plasma concentrations were achieved after 3–4 h. The terminal half-life of BAY 59-7939 was 5.7–9.2 h at steady state. There was no relevant accumulation at any dose. BAY 59-7939 was safe and well tolerated across the wide dose range studied, with predictable, dose-proportional pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and no relevant accumulation beyond steady state. These results support further investigation of BAY 59-7939 in phase II clinical trials.

Background and Objective There is a clinical need for new oral anticoagulants to prevent and treat thromboembolic diseases. Given its integral role in the coagulation cascade, factor Xa is a particularly promising target for new anticoagulation therapies. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of BAY 59–7939, an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor. Methods This single–center, randomized, single–blinded, placebo–controlled, dose–escalation study included 108 healthy white male subjects aged 19 to 45 years. Subjects received single oral doses of either BAY 59–7939 (1.25–80 mg) or placebo; in addition, 1 group received 2 doses of BAY 59–7939 (5–mg tablet and oral solution) or placebo in a crossover design. Results Oral BAY 59–7939 in single doses up to 80 mg was safe and well tolerated and was not associated with an increased risk of bleeding compared with placebo. Pharmacodynamic effects (inhibition of factor Xa activity, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and HepTest) and plasma concentration profiles were dose–dependent. Maximum inhibition of factor Xa activity was achieved 1 to 4 hours after administration of BAY 59–7939 and ranged from 20% to 61% for the 5– to 80–mg doses. BAY 59–7939 selectively inhibited factor Xa activity; thrombin (factor IIa) and antithrombin were unaffected. Inhibition of factor Xa activity and prolongation of prothrombin time correlated well with BAY 59–7939 plasma concentrations (r = 0.949 and 0.935, respectively). Conclusions BAY 59–7939 was well tolerated with predictable pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics across a wide range of doses in healthy male subjects. BAY 59–7939 was shown to be an effective and specific factor Xa inhibitor. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2005) 78, 412–421; doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2005.06.011

Assessment of cerebral blood flow velocities (CBFV) can be used as a non-invasive tool to evaluate specific drug effects, like caffeine (CAF), acetazolamide (AA) as well as cognition. Their influences on each others CBFV were evaluated in detail, using a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled three-fold cross-over study design in 18 right-handed healthy male volunteers. CBFV (maximal, mean, minimal) and pulsatility index of both middle cerebral arteries were recorded by transcranial Doppler ultrasound simultaneously, during a verbal memory test, oral CAF, intravenous AA or placebo. AA led to increase in CBFV of 25-32%. Caffeine resulted in decreased V(mean) and V(min) of 10-13%. Cognitive stimulation resulted in a slight increase of CBVF of about 4%, but was overruled by effects of AA and CAF. We conclude that pharmacological effects can easily be assessed by TCD during clinical pharmacological studies of vasoactive drugs. However intraindividual variability and effects of neuropsychological stimulation needs to be taken into account.

Groups of five male and five female Wistar rats were treated by gavage with 0, 1, 10, and 100 mg/kg body weight (b.w.) flutamide (FLU) or 0.01, 0.05, and 0.2 mg/kg b.w. of ethinylestradiol (EE2) for at least 28 days according to an enhanced Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) test guideline (TG) 407 to investigate which of the current and/or additional parameters would detect effects on the endocrine system and to provide data on intralaboratory variability. Two identical studies were performed in parallel on each compound. Common enhancements were determination of thyroid hormones (T3, T4) and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), of the stage of the estric cycle to ensure necropsy of females in diestrus, of the number and morphology of epididymal sperm, and of additional organ weights (e.g., male accessory sex organs, MASO) and histopathology of additional organs (e.g., pituitary, vagina). Endocrine-mediated findings consistently observed in these studies were decreased relative weights of MASO at 100 mg/kg FLU and at 0.2 mg/kg EE2, histological changes in pituitary and testes at > or = 10 mg/kg and in MASO, epididymis and adrenals at 100 mg/kg in FLU-treated males, histological changes in the mammary gland at > or = 0.05 mg/kg and in testes, MASO and adrenals at 0.2 mg/kg in EE2-treated males, estrogenization of uterus and vagina (despite necropsy in diestrus) at > or = 0.01 mg/kg EE2, and changes in the ovary at 0.2 mg/kg EE2. Spermatology was insensitive (EE2) or revealed changes only at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Determination of T3, T4, and TSH did not contribute to the detection of the endocrine effects (FLU) or provided equivocal results. Doubling the group size to 10 animals by combining the studies run in parallel did not increase the sensitivity of detection of endocrine-mediated effects above the level obtained by histopathological examination of groups of five animals. Only some of the proposed enhancements evaluated were helpful in detecting the endocrine-mediated effects of FLU and EE2. Evaluation of studies according to an enhanced TG 407 on 10 compounds with different endocrine activities will identify the most appropriate enhancements.

The statistical analysis of dynamic processes is a useful tool to learn how environmental and ecological systems work and how they respond to disturbances. In the context of human risk assessment of potentially harmful chemicals, many complex dynamic processes in terms of kinetics have to be taken into account. Thorough research of direct influence of chemicals to humans depends on investigations with animalsin vivo andin vitro. However, when animals serve as models of human systems, one critical step is the extrapolation from the risk observed in the experimental animals to the risk associated with the human organism. To extrapolate the observed risk in this case, the detailed knowledge of the relevant kinetic processes as well as their differences between species is fundamental. On the other hand experimental tools for these processes are quite restrictive. Based on simple experimental designs a statistical method is proposed for characterizing such kinetic processes using the well-known compartmental analysis tool and non-linear regression. The methodology is then exemplified by non-invasive toxicokinetic inhalation experiments with rats.

Objective: To investigate potential interactions between rivaroxaban, an oral direct Factor Xa inhibitor approved for the management of thromboembolic disorders, and digoxin or atorvastatin. Methods: Two randomized, phase 1 clinical trials were undertaken in healthy men to assess pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between rivaroxaban and digoxin or atorvastatin, and the safety of these drug combinations. Results: Steady-state rivaroxaban did not affect the pharmacokinetic profile of steady-state digoxin ( n = 17). Digoxin did not significantly influence the pharmacokinetic profile of single-dose rivaroxaban and had minimal effects on rivaroxaban-induced inhibition of Factor Xa activity and prolongation of clotting time. Similarly, steady-state atorvastatin did not affect the pharmacokinetic profile or the pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban and vice versa ( n = 19). All drugs (alone or in combination) were well tolerated. Conclusions: There were no clinically relevant pharmacokinetic or pharmaco - dynamic interactions between rivaroxaban and digoxin, or between rivaroxaban and atorvastatin, suggesting that rivaroxaban can be coadministered with either drug. This study also confirmed that rivaroxaban does not interact with substrates for permeability (P)-glycoprotein alone (digoxin) or P-glycoprotein and cytochrome P450(CYP)3A4 (atorvastatin).

Rivaroxaban, an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor, is currently used in clinical practice for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. This single-center, three-way crossover study was designed to investigate the pharmacodynamic effects of rivaroxaban (10 mg) and enoxaparin (40 mg) alone and in combination as well as the influence of enoxaparin on the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban in healthy male subjects. When given alone, both drugs exhibited similar, rapid anti-factor Xa activity. Combined administration resulted in an increase of ∼50% in anti-factor Xa activity and a lesser increase in activated partial thromboplastin time, compared with either drug alone. Enoxaparin had no additional effect on prolongation of the prothrombin time induced by rivaroxaban and did not affect the pharmacokinetic parameters of rivaroxaban. The results showed that rivaroxaban (10 mg) and enoxaparin (40 mg) had a similar and rapid onset of action, as indicated by the similar anti-factor Xa activity–time curves, suggesting that both drugs have a similar duration of pharmacological activity at the factor X site. Co-administration of rivaroxaban and enoxaparin is associated with enhanced pharmacodynamic effects.

This study investigated the effects of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single dose of rivaroxaban (10 mg), an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor.This single centre, non-randomized, non-blinded study included subjects with mild (n = 8) or moderate hepatic impairment (n = 8), according to the Child-Pugh classification, and gender-matched healthy subjects (n = 16).Rivaroxaban was well tolerated irrespective of hepatic function. Mild hepatic impairment did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban, compared with healthy subjects. However, in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment, total body clearance was decreased, leading to a significant increase in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). The least-squares (LS)-mean values for AUC were 1.15-fold [90% confidence interval (CI) 0.85, 1.57] and 2.27-fold (90% CI 1.68, 3.07) higher in subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment, respectively, than in healthy subjects. Consequently, the pharmacodynamic responses were significantly enhanced in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment. For inhibition of Factor Xa, increases in the area under the effect-time curve and the maximum effect were observed, with LS-mean ratios of 2.59 and 1.24, respectively, vs. healthy subjects. Prolongation of prothrombin time was similar in healthy subjects and those with mild hepatic impairment, but was significantly enhanced in those with moderate hepatic impairment.Moderate (but not mild) hepatic impairment reduced total body clearance of rivaroxaban after a single 10 mg dose, leading to increased rivaroxaban exposure and pharmacodynamic effects.

A randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted to assess the effect of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban - an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor. Subjects (n = 34) were enrolled into four groups: young males or females (aged 18-45 years) and elderly males or females (aged75 years), and received a single dose of 10 mg rivaroxaban. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were determined. Gender had no significant influence on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of rivaroxaban was 41% higher in elderly compared with young subjects; corresponding AUC values for the inhibition of Factor Xa activity and prolongation of prothrombin time were also higher. These changes were the result of reduced rivaroxaban clearance in elderly subjects, mainly owing to decreased renal function. The influence of age was not considered clinically relevant. The maximum plasma concentration was not increased in elderly subjects, and pharmacodynamic parameters returned close to baseline within 24 hours. The results indicate that age alone and gender did not have a clinically relevant effect on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban in healthy subjects after a 10 mg dose.

This study evaluated the effects of impaired renal function on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of rivaroxaban (10mg single dose), an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor.Subjects (n= 32) were stratified based on measured creatinine clearance: healthy controls (≥80ml min(-1) ), mild (50-79mlmin(-1) ), moderate (30-49mlmin(-1) ) and severe impairment (30mlmin(-1) ).Renal clearance of rivaroxaban decreased with increasing renal impairment. Thus, plasma concentrations increased and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) LS-mean values were 1.44-fold (90% confidence interval [CI] 1.1, 1.9; mild), 1.52-fold (90% CI 1.2, 2.0; moderate) and 1.64-fold (90% CI 1.2, 2.2; severe impairment) higher than in healthy controls. Corresponding values for the LS-mean of the AUC for prolongation of prothrombin time were 1.33-fold (90% CI 0.92, 1.92; mild), 2.16-fold (90% CI 1.51, 3.10 moderate) and 2.44-fold (90% CI 1.70, 3.49 severe) higher than in healthy subjects, respectively. Likewise, the LS-mean of the AUC for Factor Xa inhibition in subjects with mild renal impairment was 1.50-fold (90% CI 1.07, 2.10) higher than in healthy subjects. In subjects with moderate and severe renal impairment, the increase was 1.86-fold (90% CI 1.34, 2.59) and 2.0-fold (90% CI 1.44, 2.78) higher than in healthy subjects, respectively.Rivaroxaban clearance is decreased with increasing renal impairment, leading to increased plasma exposure and pharmacodynamic effects, as expected for a partially renally excreted drug. However, the influence of renal function on rivaroxaban clearance was moderate, even in subjects with severe renal impairment.

To determine acute analgesia by acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) when combined with pseudoephedrine (PSE) in patients with upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), we used the sore throat pain model to measure single-dose effects of ASA 500 mg/PSE 30 mg, ASA 1000 mg/PSE 60 mg, and acetaminophen (APAP) 1000 mg/PSE 60 mg (serving as a positive control). Under double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled conditions, 640 adult patients with confirmed acute pharyngitis and rhinosinusitis associated with URTI rated throat pain intensity and relief at intervals over 6 hours. Efficacy was demonstrated for both doses of ASA/PSE compared with placebo for all end points, including total pain relief and summed pain intensity differences, beginning at 20 minutes on both scales (all P < .05), and the efficacy of APAP/PSE compared with placebo was confirmed (P < .01). Greater differences in pain relief and intensity were also demonstrated between the higher and lower doses of ASA/PSE (P < .05), in particular, among 329 patients with severe pain, as well as between ASA 1000 mg/PSE 60 mg and APAP 1000 mg/PSE 60 mg (P < .05). No serious adverse events were reported. This study demonstrates that ASA is a well-tolerated and effective analgesic in 500- and 1000-mg doses when combined with pseudoephedrine.

Background: Rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939) is a novel, oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor in advanced clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. Unwanted pro-arrhythmic effects are a common reason for drugs failing to gain regulatory approval; these properties can be detected by assessing the effect of the drug on the QT interval. Objective: This study was performed, in accordance with International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) E14 guidance, to assess whether rivaroxaban prolongs the QT interval. Study design: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, four-way crossover study. Setting: The study was conducted at a clinical pharmacology research unit. Subjects: Healthy male and female subjects (n = 54) aged ≥50 years were enrolled and remained in the study unit for 3 days for each treatment. Of these, 50 patients were eligible for the QT analysis. Intervention: Subjects received single oral doses of rivaroxaban 45 mg or 15 mg, moxifloxacin 400 mg (positive control), or placebo. Outcome measures: Multiple ECGs were taken at frequent intervals after drug administration, and the QT interval was measured manually under blinded conditions at a central laboratory. The Fridericia correction formula (QTcF) was used to correct the QT interval for heart rate. The primary outcome was the effect of rivaroxaban or moxifloxacin on the placebo-subtracted QTcF 3 hours after administration. The frequency of outlying QTcF values and the tolerability of the treatments were also assessed. Results: All treatments were well tolerated and had no effect on heart rate. Moxifloxacin established the required assay sensitivity; placebo-subtracted QTcF 3 hours after moxifloxacin administration was prolonged by 9.77 ms (95% CI 7.39, 12.15). Placebo-subtracted QTcF values 3 hours after rivaroxaban administration were −0.91 ms (95% CI −3.33, 1.52) and −1.83 ms (95% CI −4.19, 0.54) with rivaroxaban 45 mg and 15 mg, respectively. QTcF was not prolonged with rivaroxaban at any time, and the frequency of outlying results with rivaroxaban and placebo was similar. Conclusion: This thorough QT study, which was performed in accordance with ICH E14 guidelines, shows that rivaroxaban does not prolong the QTc interval. Therefore, the potential of rivaroxaban for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders, including chronic cardiovascular disorders, can be investigated in appropriate clinical studies without the need for intensive monitoring of the QTc interval.

Rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939) is an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor in advanced development. This study was undertaken to investigate its effects on thrombin generation. In this placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover study, 12 healthy subjects received rivaroxaban (single 5- or 30-mg dose) or placebo. Thrombin generation was investigated by measuring the endogenous thrombin potential and prothrombinase-induced clotting time. Maximal effect of rivaroxaban was observed 2 hours after drug administration: prothrombinase-induced clotting time was prolonged 1.8 and 2.3 times baseline after rivaroxaban 5 and 30 mg, respectively. Collagen-induced endogenous thrombin potential was reduced by approximately 80% and approximately 90% compared with baseline after rivaroxaban 5 and 30 mg, respectively, and tissue factor-induced endogenous thrombin potential was reduced by approximately 40% (5 mg) and approximately 65% (30 mg), respectively. Thrombin generation remained inhibited for 24 hours. There was a close correlation between plasma concentration of rivaroxaban and prolongation of prothrombinase-induced clotting time and reduction in endogenous thrombin potential. Rivaroxaban strongly inhibits platelet-induced thrombin generation, after activation of either platelets or the coagulation pathway, even in the presence of minimal factor Xa inhibition in plasma.

What is already known about this subject • Rivaroxaban is a novel anticoagulant with predictable, dose-proportional pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy subjects. • It is in clinical development for the prevention of thromboembolic disorders in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery. • Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as naproxen, are widely used for pain relief and treatment of inflammation, particularly in patients who have undergone orthopaedic surgery. As it is likely that patients receiving rivaroxaban after orthopaedic surgery will also receive NSAIDs, this study was performed to determine whether there was any mechanistic interaction between rivaroxaban and naproxen. What this study adds • This study demonstrated that there was no mechanistic interaction between rivaroxaban and naproxen in healthy subjects. • This finding was used to design large-scale clinical trials of rivaroxaban, in which patients were also allowed to use NSAIDs. • These ongoing trials will provide definitive data regarding the interaction between rivaroxaban and NSAIDs. Aims Rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939) is in advanced clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. Frequent co-medications in the patient populations likely to receive rivaroxaban include NSAIDs. This randomized, two-way crossover study, with a naproxen run-in period, was performed to determine whether naproxen influences the tolerability, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban. Methods Eleven healthy, young males received naproxen 500 mg on two consecutive days, a single dose of rivaroxaban 15 mg, or both. Results Treatments were well tolerated: adverse events (eight in total), reported by three subjects, were mild and not drug related. Rivaroxaban inhibited Factor Xa activity by 35% and prolonged prothrombin time [by 1.4 times baseline (tb)], activated partial thromboplastin time (1.3 tb) and the HepTest (1.9 tb). Naproxen had no influence on these measures and the combination of rivaroxaban and naproxen did not affect platelet aggregation. Rivaroxaban and naproxen given together significantly increased bleeding time compared with rivaroxaban alone (P = 0.017). However, this difference was small compared with the effect of naproxen given alone, except in one subject. Least squares-means ratios for the AUC and Cmax of rivaroxaban after administration alone and with naproxen were 1.125 [90% confidence interval (CI) 0.995, 1.271] and 1.095 (90% CI 0.905, 1.325), respectively. Conclusions There appeared to be no clinically relevant interaction between rivaroxaban and naproxen in healthy subjects, although some individuals may be more sensitive to the combination. Large-scale Phase III clinical studies will be required to confirm whether there is an increased risk of bleeding during treatment with rivaroxaban and concomitant NSAIDs.

To investigate the influence of food and administration of an antacid (aluminum-magnesium hydroxide) or ranitidine on the absorption of BAY 59-7939 (rivaroxaban), 4 randomized studies were performed in healthy male subjects. In 2 food interaction studies, subjects received BAY 59-7939, either as two 5-mg tablets (fasted and fed), four 5-mg tablets (fasted), or one 20-mg tablet (fasted and fed). In 2 drug interaction studies, BAY 59-7939 (six 5-mg tablets) was given alone or with ranitidine (150 mg twice daily, preceded by a 3-day pretreatment phase) or antacid (10 mL). Plasma samples were obtained to assess pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of BAY 59-7939. In the presence of food, time to maximum concentration (t(max)) was delayed by 1.25 hours; maximum concentration (C(max)) and area under the curve (AUC) were increased, with reduced interindividual variability at higher doses of BAY 59-7939. Compared with baseline, BAY 59-7939 resulted in a relative increase in maximum prothrombin time (PT) prolongation of 44% (10 mg) and 53% (20 mg) in the fasted state, compared with 53% and 83% after food. Time to maximum PT prolongation was delayed by 0.5 to 1.5 hours after food, with no relevant influence of food type. No significant difference in C(max) and AUC was observed with coadministration of BAY 59-7939 and ranitidine or antacid.

Histologic examination of a liver biopsy specimen is regarded as the reference standard for detecting liver fibrosis. Biopsy can be painful and hazardous, and assessment is subjective and prone to sampling error. We developed a panel of sensitive automated immunoassays to detect matrix constituents and mediators of matrix remodeling in serum to evaluate their performance in the detection of liver fibrosis.In an international multicenter cohort study, serum levels of 9 surrogate markers of liver fibrosis were compared with fibrosis stage in liver biopsy specimens obtained from 1021 subjects with chronic liver disease. Discriminant analysis of a test set of samples was used to identify an algorithm combining age, hyaluronic acid, amino-terminal propeptide of type III collagen, and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase 1 that was subsequently evaluated using a validation set of biopsy specimens and serum samples.The algorithm detected fibrosis (sensitivity, 90%) and accurately detected the absence of fibrosis (negative predictive value for significant fibrosis, 92%; area under the curve of a receiver operating characteristic plot, .804; standard error, .02; P.0001; 95% confidence interval, .758-.851). Performance was excellent for alcoholic liver disease and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. The algorithm performed equally well in comparison with each of the pathologists. In contrast, pathologists' agreement over histologic scores ranged from very good to moderate (kappa = .97-.46).Assessment of liver fibrosis with multiple serum markers used in combination is sensitive, specific, and reproducible, suggesting they may be used in conjunction with liver biopsy to assess a range of chronic liver diseases.

The results of a cross-validation of the radioluminography (RLG) and liquid scintillation counting (LSC) methods are presented. The methods for the determination of radioactivity concentrations were compared in 16 organs, after administration of (14)C-labeled substances to rats. LSC measurements of two kinds were used as reference methods for RLG: (1) quantitative determination of radioactivity after conventional dissection (interindividual comparison) and (2) quantitative determination of radioactivity in tissue punches taken from the whole-body sections after they had undergone RLG measurement (intraindividual comparison). Blood standards containing known concentrations were used for calibration. For statistical evaluation log-linear regression analysis of paired concentration values and organ-specific 95% confidence intervals of the log-transformed RLG/LSC concentration quotients were compared. For most organs, the slopes of the regression lines and the means of the concentration quotients were within the defined equivalence range of 0.80-1.25. Deviations were distinctly smaller in the intraindividual comparison. For some organs, however, it became clear that found concentrations were affected by self-absorption (RLG) and by differences in sample preparation (LSC). In conclusion, quantification with RLG is a reliable and reproducible method with comparable measurement precision and greater accuracy in respect of tissue localization, compared to LSC (dissection).

Objectives: To evaluate a new tenascin-C assay performed on the Bayer Immuno 1™ system. Design and methods: The precision was measured using three levels of serum pools. Linearity was tested by diluting patient serum samples containing high tenascin-C concentrations, and the minimal detectable concentration determined by repetitive analysis of the zero calibrator. Preliminary reference intervals were determined by testing serum samples from 220 healthy individuals. Biovariability was estimated in a cohort of 20 apparently healthy subjects over 18 days. The levels of tenascin-C in patients with different liver diseases was tested. Results: The detection limit was 2 ng/mL. At concentrations ranging from 325 to 1957 ng/mL the assay demonstrated within-run and between-run CVs ranging from 4% to 3.6% and 8.4% to 6.7%, respectively. Dilutions of sera were linear and parallel to the standard curve with recoveries ranging from 97% to 100%. The reference interval (central 95% interval) for tenascin-C in serum of healthy adults was 199–906 ng/mL. The variability study yielded an analytical variability, CVA, of 1.8%; a within-subject variability, CVI, of 11.7%; and a between-subject variability, CVG, of 39.3%. tenascin-C concentrations in sera of liver disease patients were significantly increased. Conclusions: The novel assay provides a rapid and reliable procedure for the determination of tenascin-C levels in human sera.

Rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939) is an oral, direct Factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor in advanced clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. It has predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy subjects. Approximately 30% of rivaroxaban is excreted unchanged in the urine; therefore, renal excretion is an important route of elimination. This multicenter study was performed to evaluate the effect of renal impairment on the tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of a single oral 10 mg dose of rivaroxaban. Subjects (N=32) were allocated to one of four groups (matched by age and gender), based on calculated creatinine clearance (CrCL): ≥80 mL/min (control); 50–79 mL/min (mild impairment); 30–49 mL/min (moderate impairment); and

Anticoagulants, such as warfarin, are indicated for a variety of medical conditions, some of which are strongly age dependent. In younger people, the prevalence of many cardiovascular diseases is typically higher in males; however, with increasing age, this difference often resolves. Rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939) is a novel, oral, direct Factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor in advanced clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. This randomized, single-blind study was performed to investigate the influences of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and tolerability of rivaroxaban in healthy subjects. Four subject groups (young males or females, aged 18–45 years, and elderly males or females, aged >75 years) received a single dose of rivaroxaban 10 mg or placebo (N=34). Gender had no effect on the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), or maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of rivaroxaban (Table); however, elderly subjects had higher AUC values than young subjects (least-squares mean ratio [LS-mean] 1.41, 90% confidence interval [CI] 1.20–1.66). The Cmax of rivaroxaban was unaffected by age (LS-mean 1.08, 90% CI 0.96–1.25). Total and renal clearance of rivaroxaban correlated positively with creatinine clearance (CrCL), and inversely with age. The patterns of inhibition of FXa activity by rivaroxaban for all groups were mirrored by those of prolongation of prothrombin time (PT); the maximum effect (Emax) of both consistently occurred 2–4 hours after administration and was unaffected by age or gender. In parallel with the PK results, the AUC of the PD effect, from administration of rivaroxaban to the final time point (AUC0-tn), was increased in elderly subjects (inhibition of FXa activity, LS-mean 1.58, 90% Cl 1.32–1.89; prolongation of PT, LS-mean 1.46, 90% Cl 1.29–1.66); however, all values returned to within 10% of baseline 24 hours after administration of rivaroxaban. The AUC0-tn values correlated inversely with CrCL. Rivaroxaban was well tolerated by all groups; the incidence and intensity of adverse events was similar to placebo. In conclusion, these results demonstrate that the observed effect of age on the PK and PD of this rivaroxaban dose - increased AUC in elderly subjects - was largely due to reduced renal function. Gender had virtually no effect on the PK and PD of rivaroxaban, and neither age nor gender affected tolerability. These findings suggest that rivaroxaban, at similar doses, may not require dose adjustment in elderly patients, or for gender. Phase II studies of rivaroxaban for the prevention of venous thromboembolism also suggested that dose adjustment may not be required for age or gender in this indication. However, this will require confirmation in large-scale phase III studies. | | Young males | Young females | Elderly males | Elderly females | |:------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------ | ------------- | ------------- | --------------- | | Values are geometric means/geometric coefficients of variation (%) | | AUC (μg·h/L) | 1477/29.97 | 1210/12.69 | 1839/28.24 | 1941/16.15 | | Cmax (μg/L) | 227.57/18.25 | 209.73/23.95 | 228.80/23.79 | 245.01/18.23 | | Inhibition of FXa | | | | | | Emax (%) | 50.86/16.84 | 53.99/12.44 | 56.30/6.39 | 60.16/9.01 | | AUC0-tn (%/h) | 432.76/38.75 | 343.14/24.61 | 613.94/11.09 | 596.48/23.20 | | Prolongation of PT | | | | | | Emax (x-fold) | 1.62/9.06 | 1.69/8.49 | 1.66/5.67 | 1.75/4.63 | | AUC0-tn (x-fold/h) | 22.69/28.09 | 15.98/10.41 | 29.77/3.15 | 26.06/17.52 | PK and PD parameters in subjects receiving rivaroxaban 10 mg (n=6 in each group)

Currently, agents used for the prevention of venous thromboembolism, such as low molecular weight heparins and pentasaccharides, require dose adjustments for patients in extreme weight categories. BAY 59-7939 is a novel, oral, direct Factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor currently undergoing clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. In this single-center, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, the influence of extremely low and high body weight on the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of a single 10 mg dose of BAY 59-7939 administered with food was investigated. In total, 48 healthy male and female subjects aged 20–54 years and in three different weight groups (≤ 50, 70–80, and >120 kg) were evaluated; 12 received placebo and 36 received BAY 59-7939. The 70–80 kg and >120 kg groups were gender-balanced (six men and six women in each group); the ≤ 50 kg group comprised of 12 women. Overall, BAY 59-7939 was well tolerated. No serious adverse events were reported; all events were of mild to moderate intensity and resolved 7 days after drug administration. The occurrence of adverse events was similar among the weight groups. No adverse events were reported in the placebo group. FXa was inhibited by BAY 59-7939 in all three weight groups, with a maximum inhibition (Emax) of 46.8%, 45.8%, and 41.7% in the ≤ 50, 70–80, and >120 kg groups, respectively; maximum inhibition was observed about 2–3 hours after BAY 59-7939 administration in all three weight groups. AUC for inhibition of Factor Xa activity was comparable for all volunteer groups regardless of the body weight. BAY 59-7939 prolonged prothrombin time (PT), which was less pronounced in the higher weight groups: 1.7 times baseline (tb), 1.6 tb, and 1.5 tb in subjects ≤ 50, 70–80, and >120 kg, respectively. The pharmacodynamic parameters have returned to baseline within 24 hours in all weight groups. Placebo treatment had no effect on PT. The clotting tests activated partial thromboplastin time and HepTest were also distinctly prolonged after drug administration in all weight groups; the prolongation was slightly more pronounced in subjects in the ≤ 50 kg group than in the other weight groups. The bioavailability of BAY 59-7939 as a 10 mg single dose, in terms of AUC of plasma concentrations, was similar in all three weight groups (P=0.205). However, peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) were 24% higher in subjects with ≤ 50 kg body weight compared with normal-weight subjects. For subjects >120 kg, Cmax was similar to normal-weight subjects. No pharmacokinetic differences between men and women were detected in the normal-weight and >120 kg groups. In conclusion, these data demonstrate that only small influences of body weight on pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic parameters are observed which require no dose adjustment of BAY 59-7936 in subjects with extreme body weight.