Search

Perioperative medical management during total hip arthroplasty (THA) is continuously improving, allowing an increasing number of medically complex patients to undergo total joint arthroplasty. This study examined mortalities, medical complications, implant survivorships, and clinical outcomes of THA in patients who have pulmonary hypertension (HTN).We identified 638 patients who had pulmonary HTN and underwent 508 primary THAs and 191 revision THAs from 2000 to 2016 at a tertiary care center. Patients were followed up at regular intervals until death, revision surgery, or last clinical follow-up. Perioperative medical complications were individually reviewed. The risk of death was examined by calculating standardized mortality ratios and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Cumulative incidence analyses were used for reporting mortality, reoperation, and revision with death as a competing risk.The 90-day mortality was 1.8 and 3.1% for primary and revision THAs, respectively. The risk of death was approximately two-fold higher compared to primary (HR 2.69) and revision (HR 2.04) THA patients who did not have pulmonary HTN. Rate of medical complications within 90 days from surgery were 6.2 and 13.1% in primary and revision THAs, respectively. The 10-year cumulative incidence of any revision was 9 and 14% following primaries and revisions, respectively.Patients who had pulmonary HTN undergoing primary and revision THAs had increased risk of death and experienced a high rate of medical complications within 90 days of surgery. Counseling of risks, medical optimization, and referral to medical centers expert at managing complex medical problems should be considered.

Establishing imaging registries for large patient cohorts is challenging because manual labeling is tedious and relying solely on DICOM (digital imaging and communications in medicine) metadata can result in errors. We endeavored to establish an automated hip and pelvic radiography registry of total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients by utilizing deep-learning pipelines. The aims of the study were (1) to utilize these automated pipelines to identify all pelvic and hip radiographs with appropriate annotation of laterality and presence or absence of implants, and (2) to automatically measure acetabular component inclination and version for THA images.We retrospectively retrieved 846,988 hip and pelvic radiography DICOM files from 20,378 patients who underwent primary or revision THA performed at our institution from 2000 to 2020. Metadata for the files were screened followed by extraction of imaging data. Two deep-learning algorithms (an EfficientNetB3 classifier and a YOLOv5 object detector) were developed to automatically determine the radiographic appearance of all files. Additional deep-learning algorithms were utilized to automatically measure the acetabular angles on anteroposterior pelvic and lateral hip radiographs. Algorithm performance was compared with that of human annotators on a random test sample of 5,000 radiographs.Deep-learning algorithms enabled appropriate exclusion of 209,332 DICOM files (24.7%) as misclassified non-hip/pelvic radiographs or having corrupted pixel data. The final registry was automatically curated and annotated in8 hours and included 168,551 anteroposterior pelvic, 176,890 anteroposterior hip, 174,637 lateral hip, and 117,578 oblique hip radiographs. The algorithms achieved 99.9% accuracy, 99.6% precision, 99.5% recall, and a 99.6% F1 score in determining the radiograph appearance.We developed a highly accurate series of deep-learning algorithms to rapidly curate and annotate THA patient radiographs. This efficient pipeline can be utilized by other institutions or registries to construct radiography databases for patient care, longitudinal surveillance, and large-scale research. The stepwise approach for establishing a radiography registry can further be utilized as a workflow guide for other anatomic areas.Diagnostic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Optimal management of morbid obesity before total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains debated. Recently, bariatric procedures have become more common with advancements in surgical techniques. We hypothesized that bariatric surgery prior to primary THA would mitigate acute postoperative complications and improve implant survivorship.A retrospective review from 1995 to 2020 identified 88 primary THA procedures in 71 unique patients who previously underwent bariatric surgery (73% Roux-en-Y). This cohort was matched 1:1:1 for age, gender, surgical year, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and Charlson Comorbidity Index to cohorts of patients with body mass index (BMI)40 kg/mRevision rates for bariatric patients were higher relative to controls with low (hazard ratio [HR] 19, P.01) and high BMI (HR 8, P.01). Reoperation rates showed a similar increase for bariatric patients when compared to low (HR 9, P.01) and high BMI (HR 4, P = .01) patients. Moreover, bariatric patients had an increased dislocation risk compared to the low (HR 7, P = .03) and high BMI (HR 17, P.01) patients. Contemporary bariatric techniques had similar complications, revisions, and reoperations relative to historical procedures.Morbidly obese patients undergoing THA have increased risks of certain complications, but it is unclear if bariatric surgery improves this risk. This study found that patients undergoing bariatric surgery have worse implant survivorship and higher dislocation rates compared to patients with naturally low and high BMIs. Further investigation into the post-bariatric metabolic state is warranted.Prognostic Level IV.

No prior studies have examined outcomes based on approach concordance between primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). There is theoretical concern that performing surgery through multiple planes could potentiate dislocation risk. This study aimed to assess the impact of utilizing concordant vs discordant surgical approaches between primary and revision THA on incidence of dislocation, re-revision, reoperation, and nonoperative complications.Between 2000 and 2018, 705 revision THAs were retrospectively identified in patients who underwent primary THA at the same academic center. Surgical approach was determined for primary and revision THA from operative notes with dislocations, re-revisions, reoperations, and complications determined from our total joint registry. Complication rates were compared between those with concordant and discordant surgical approaches. Mean age was 65 years, 50% were female, mean body mass index was 31 kg/mSurgical approach discordance occurred in 97 cases (14%), which was more frequent when the direct anterior approach was used for primary THA (72%, P.001) compared to lateral (12%) or posterior (10%) approaches. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of dislocations, re-revisions, reoperations, and nonoperative complications among those with concordant and discordant approaches for the overall cohort and when analyzed by primary approach (P.05 for all).Comparable dislocation and complication rates were observed among revision THAs with concordant and discordant approaches between primary and revision THA. These data provide reassurance that changing vs maintaining the surgical approach from primary to revision THA does not significantly increase dislocation or re-revision risk.IV.

The specific advantages of spinal anesthesia compared with general anesthesia for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the pain control, length of stay, and postoperative outcomes associated with spinal anesthesia compared with general anesthesia in a large cohort of primary THAs from a single, high-volume academic institution.We retrospectively identified 13,730 primary THAs (11,319 patients) from 2001 to 2016 using our total joint registry. Of these cases, 58% had general anesthesia and 42% had spinal anesthesia. The demographic characteristics were similar between groups, with mean age of 64 years, 51% female, and mean body mass index (BMI) of 31 kg/m 2 . Data were analyzed using an inverse probability of treatment weighted model based on a propensity score that accounted for numerous patient and operative factors. The mean follow-up was 6 years.Patients treated with spinal anesthesia had lower Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) scores (p0.001) and required fewer postoperative oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) at all time points evaluated (p0.001). Patients treated with spinal anesthesia also had shorter hospital length of stay (p = 0.02), fewer altered mental status events (odds ratio [OR], 0.7; p = 0.02), and fewer intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (OR, 0.7; p = 0.01). There was no difference in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (p = 0.8), pulmonary embolism (p = 0.4), 30-day readmissions (p = 0.17), 90-day readmissions (p = 0.18), all-cause revisions (p = 0.17), or all-cause reoperations (p = 0.14).In this large, single-institution study, we found that spinal anesthesia was associated with reduced pain scores and OME use postoperatively. Furthermore, spinal anesthesia resulted in fewer altered mental status events and ICU admissions. These data favor the use of spinal anesthesia in primary THAs.Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have investigated the distribution of hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle in healthy populations; however, few have evaluated this metric in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to compare HKA angle distribution in early and advanced knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients. METHODS: Full limb radiographs were used to measure HKA angle for 983 subjects from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) cohort and 4901 pre-TKA patients from an institutional cohort. Measurements were made using a previously-validated deep learning algorithm. Linear regression models were used to determine the association of HKA alignment angle with patient characteristics. RESULTS: The mean± standard deviation HKA angle was −1.3° ± 3.2° in the OAI cohort and −4.1° ± 6.1° in the pre-TKA cohort. In the OAI cohort, normal alignment (64%) was the most common knee alignment followed by varus (29%), and valgus (7%). In pre-TKA patients, the most common alignment was varus (62%), followed by normal (27%) and valgus (11%). In pre-TKA patients, mean HKA angle in primary knee OA, post-traumatic knee OA and rheumatoid arthritis patients were −4.3° ± 6.1°, −3.2° ± 6.4° and −2.9° ± 6.1°, respectively. HKA angle was strongly associated (p

Aims Varus-valgus constrained (VVC) devices are typically used in revision settings, often with stems to mitigate the risk of aseptic loosening. However, in at least one system, the VVC insert is compatible with the primary posterior-stabilized (PS) femoral component, which may be an option in complex primary situations. We sought to determine the implant survivorship, radiological and clinical outcomes, and complications when this VVC insert was coupled with a PS femur without stems in complex primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). Methods Through our institution’s total joint registry, we identified 113 primary TKAs (103 patients) performed between 2007 and 2017 in which a VVC insert was coupled with a standard cemented PS femur without stems. Mean age was 68 years (SD 10), mean BMI was 32 kg/m2 (SD 7), and 59 patients (50%) were male. Mean follow-up was four years (2 to 10). Results The five-year survivorship free from aseptic loosening was 100%. The five-year survivorship free from any revision was 99%, with the only revision performed for infection. The five-year survivorship free from reoperation was 93%. The most common reoperation was treatment for infection (n = 4; 4%), followed by manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA; n = 2; 2%). Survivorship free from any complication at five years was 90%, with superficial wound infection as the most frequent (n = 4; 4%). At most recent follow-up, two TKAs had non-progressive radiolucent lines about both the tibial and femoral components. Knee Society Scores improved from 53 preoperatively to 88 at latest follow-up (p < 0.001). Conclusion For complex primary TKA in occasional situations, coupling a VVC insert with a standard PS femur without stems proved reliable and durable at five years. Longer-term follow-up is required before recommending this technique more broadly. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(11):921–925.

Aims Spinal anaesthesia has seen increased use in contemporary primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). However, controversy exists about the benefits of spinal in comparison to general anaesthesia in primary TKAs. This study aimed to investigate the pain control, length of stay (LOS), and complications associated with spinal versus general anaesthesia in primary TKAs from a single, high-volume academic centre. Methods We retrospectively identified 17,690 primary TKAs (13,297 patients) from 2001 to 2016 using our institutional total joint registry, where 52% had general anaesthesia and 48% had spinal anaesthesia. Baseline characteristics were similar between cohorts with a mean age of 68 years (SD 10), 58% female (n = 7,669), and mean BMI of 32 kg/m2 (SD 7). Pain was evaluated using oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) and numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) data. Complications including 30- and 90-day readmissions were studied. Data were analyzed using an inverse probability of treatment weighted model based on propensity score that included many patient and surgical factors. Mean follow-up was seven years (2 to 18). Results Patients treated with spinal anaesthesia required fewer postoperative OMEs (p < 0.001) and had lower NPRS scores (p < 0.001). Spinal anaesthesia also had fewer cases of altered mental status (AMS; odds ratio (OR) 1.3; p = 0.044), as well as 30-day (OR 1.4; p < 0.001) and 90-day readmissions (OR 1.5; p < 0.001). General anaesthesia was associated with increased risk of any revision (OR 1.2; p = 0.021) and any reoperation (1.3; p < 0.001). Conclusion In the largest single institutional report to date, we found that spinal anaesthesia was associated with significantly lower OME use, lower risk of AMS, and lower overall 30- and 90-day readmissions following primary TKAs. Additionally, spinal anaesthesia was associated with reduced risk of any revision and any reoperation after accounting for numerous patient and operative factors. When possible and safe, spinal anaesthesia should be considered in primary TKAs. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(11):1209–1214.

In this work, we applied and validated an artificial intelligence technique known as generative adversarial networks (GANs) to create large volumes of high-fidelity synthetic anteroposterior (AP) pelvis radiographs that can enable deep learning (DL)-based image analyses, while ensuring patient privacy.AP pelvis radiographs with native hips were gathered from an institutional registry between 1998 and 2018. The data was used to train a model to create 512 × 512 pixel synthetic AP pelvis images. The network was trained on 25 million images produced through augmentation. A set of 100 random images (50/50 real/synthetic) was evaluated by 3 orthopaedic surgeons and 2 radiologists to discern real versus synthetic images. Two models (joint localization and segmentation) were trained using synthetic images and tested on real images.The final model was trained on 37,640 real radiographs (16,782 patients). In a computer assessment of image fidelity, the final model achieved an "excellent" rating. In a blinded review of paired images (1 real, 1 synthetic), orthopaedic surgeon reviewers were unable to correctly identify which image was synthetic (accuracy = 55%, Kappa = 0.11), highlighting synthetic image fidelity. The synthetic and real images showed equivalent performance when they were assessed by established DL models.This work shows the ability to use a DL technique to generate a large volume of high-fidelity synthetic pelvis images not discernible from real imaging by computers or experts. These images can be used for cross-institutional sharing and model pretraining, further advancing the performance of DL models without risk to patient data safety.Level III.

PURPOSE: To develop a multimodal machine learning–based pipeline to predict patient-specific risk of dislocation following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study retrospectively evaluated 17 073 patients who underwent primary THA between 1998 and 2018. A test set of 1718 patients was held out. A hybrid network of EfficientNet-B4 and Swin-B transformer was developed to classify patients according to 5-year dislocation outcomes from preoperative anteroposterior pelvic radiographs and clinical characteristics (demographics, comorbidities, and surgical characteristics). The most informative imaging features, extracted by the mentioned model, were selected and concatenated with clinical features. A collection of these features was then used to train a multimodal survival XGBoost model to predict the individualized hazard of dislocation within 5 years. C index was used to evaluate the multimodal survival model on the test set and compare it with another clinical-only model trained only on clinical data. Shapley additive explanation values were used for model explanation. RESULTS: The study sample had a median age of 65 years (IQR: 18 years; 52.1% [8889] women) with a 5-year dislocation incidence of 2%. On the holdout test set, the clinical-only model achieved a C index of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.60, 0.68). The addition of imaging features boosted multimodal model performance to a C index of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.78; P = .02). CONCLUSION: Due to its discrimination ability and explainability, this risk calculator can be a potential powerful dislocation risk stratification and THA planning tool. Keywords: Conventional Radiography, Surgery, Skeletal-Appendicular, Hip, Outcomes Analysis, Supervised Learning, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM) Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2022

Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is among the most common causes of early revision in contemporary practice. Abnormal spinopelvic alignment increases risk for dislocation, but methods to identify such are limited and can be complex. We sought to determine the effect of pelvic tilt, using a novel radiographic measurement, on dislocation risk by evaluating those with and without a history of dislocation.Using our institutional total joint registry, we identified 10,082 primary THAs performed between 2006 and 2015. Postoperatively, 177 dislocated (1.7%). Dislocators were matched 1:1 to control patients who did not dislocate. Pelvic tilt was calculated using the pubic symphysis to sacrococcygeal junction distance (PSCD) from a supine anteroposterior pelvis radiograph both preoperatively and postoperatively. The association between dislocation and both pelvic tilt and PSCD was then evaluated by logistic regression. Mean follow-up was 3 years.Patients who dislocated had more posterior pelvic tilt (mean pelvic tilt of 57° vs 60°; P = .02) and smaller PSCDs (mean 41 mm vs 46 mm; P = .04) than controls. Patients with a PSCD0 mm (symphysis above sacrococcygeal junction) had 9-fold odds of dislocation compared to those with a PSCD50 (odds ratio 9; P = .006).Patients who dislocated following primary THA had more posterior pelvic tilt. Additionally, those with a PSCD0 had 9-fold odds of dislocation. Assessing the PSCD can alert a surgeon of increased risk for dislocation and identification of a negative PSCD should encourage further investigation or optimization of the preoperative plan to minimize dislocation risk.Level IV, case-control study.

Our institution previously initiated a perioperative surgical home initiative to improve quality and efficiency across the hospital arc of care of primary total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty patients. Phase II of this project aimed to (1) expand the perioperative surgical home to include revision total hip arthroplasties and total knee arthroplasties, hip preservation procedures, and reconstructions after oncologic resections; (2) expand the project to include the preoperative phase; and (3) further refine the perioperative surgical home goals accomplished in phase I.Phase II of the Orthopedic Surgery and Anesthesiology Surgical Improvement Strategies project ran from July 2018 to July 2019. The evaluated arc of care spanned from the preoperative surgical consult visit through 90 days postoperative in the expanded population described above.Mean length of stay decreased from 2.2 days to 2.0 days (P.001), 90-day readmission decreased from 3.0% to 1.6% (P.001), and Press-Ganey scores increased from 77.1 to 79.2 (97th percentile). Mean and maximum pain scores and opioid consumption remained unchanged (lowest P = .31). Annual surgical volume increased by 10%. Composite changes in surgical volume and cost reductions equaled $5 million.Application of previously successful health systems engineering tools and methods in phase I of Orthopedic Surgery and Anesthesiology Surgical Improvement Strategies enabled additional evolution of an orthopedic perioperative surgical home to encompass more diverse and complex patient populations while increasing system-wide quality, safety, and financial outcomes. Improved process and outcomes metrics reflected increased efficiency across the episode of care without untoward effects.III Therapeutic.

Implementing tools that identify cost-saving opportunities for ambulatory orthopaedic surgeries can improve access to value-based care. We developed and internally validated a machine learning (ML) algorithm to predict cost drivers of total charges after ambulatory unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).We queried the New York State Ambulatory Surgery and Services database to identify patients who underwent ambulatory, defined as24 hours of care before discharge, elective UKA between 2014 and 2016. A total of 1,311 patients were included. The median costs after ambulatory UKA were $14,710. Patient demographics and intraoperative parameters were entered into 4 candidate ML algorithms. The most predictive model was selected following internal validation of candidate models, with conventional linear regression as a benchmark. Global variable importance and partial dependence curves were constructed to determine the impact of each input parameter on total charges.The gradient-boosted ensemble model outperformed all candidate algorithms and conventional linear regression. The major differential cost drivers of UKA identified (in decreasing order of magnitude) were increased operating room time, length of stay, use of regional and adjunctive periarticular analgesia, utilization of computer-assisted navigation, and routinely sending resected tissue to pathology.We developed and internally validated a supervised ML algorithm that identified operating room time, length of stay, use of computer-assisted navigation, regional primary anesthesia, adjunct periarticular analgesia, and routine surgical pathology as essential cost drivers of UKA. Following external validation, this tool may enable surgeons and health insurance providers optimize the delivery of value-based care to patients receiving outpatient UKA.III.

BACKGROUND: Many risk factors have been described for dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA), yet a patient-specific risk assessment tool remains elusive. The purpose of this study was to develop a high-dimensional, patient-specific risk-stratification nomogram that allows dynamic risk modification based on operative decisions. METHODS: In this study, 29,349 THAs, including 21,978 primary and 7371 revision cases, performed between 1998 and 2018 were evaluated. During a mean 6-year follow-up, 1521 THAs were followed by a dislocation. Patients were characterized, through individual-chart review, according to non-modifiable factors (demographics, indication for THA, spine disease, prior spine surgery, and neurologic disease) and modifiable operative decisions (operative approach, femoral head diameter, and type of acetabular liner [standard, elevated, constrained, or dual-mobility]). Multivariable regression models and nomograms were developed with dislocation as a binary outcome at 1 year and 5 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Dislocation risk, based on patient-specific comorbidities and operative decisions, was wide-ranging—from 0.3% to 13% at 1 year and from 0.4% to 19% at 5 years after primary THA, and from 2% to 32% at 1 year and from 3% to 42% at 5 years after revision THA. In the primary-THA group, the direct anterior approach (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.27) and lateral approach (HR = 0.58) decreased the dislocation risk compared with the posterior approach. After adjusting for the approach in that group, the combination of a ≥36-mm-diameter femoral head and an elevated liner yielded the largest decrease in dislocation risk (HR = 0.28), followed by dual-mobility constructs (HR = 0.48). In the patients who underwent revision THA, the adjusted risk of dislocation was most markedly decreased by the use of a dual-mobility construct (HR = 0.40), followed by a ≥36-mm femoral head and an elevated liner (HR = 0.88). The adjusted risk of dislocation after revision THA was decreased by acetabular revision (HR = 0.58), irrespective of whether other components were revised. CONCLUSIONS: Our patient-specific dislocation risk calculator, which was strengthened by our use of a robust multivariable model that accounted for comorbidities associated with instability, demonstrated wide-ranging patient-specific risks based on comorbidity profiles. The resultant nomograms can be used as a screening tool to identify patients at high risk for dislocation following THA and to individualize operative decisions for evidence-based risk mitigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a common inflammatory spondyloarthropathy with hip involvement in 40% of patients. With the recent interest in the hip-spine interplay, the purpose of this study was to define the long-term outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the setting of AS. Methods 174 hips in patients with AS treated with revision THA from 1969 to 2016 were identified. Mean age at revision THA was 53 years and 76% were male. Cumulative incidences of any re-revision, reoperation, and dislocation were calculated using a competing risk analysis. Mean follow-up was 13 years. Results The cumulative incidence of any re-revision after index revision THA was 7% at 5 years and 36% at 20 years. Cumulative incidence of any reoperation was 9% at 5 years and 38% at 20 years. Cumulative incidence of dislocation was 6% at 5 years and 8% at 20 years. Revision THAs performed with contemporary implants (2000-2016) had a lower but statistically nonsignificant cumulative incidence of any re-revision when compared with historical implants (before 2000) at 5 years (5% vs 8%), 10 years (11% vs 18%), and 15 years (11% vs 38%) (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-1.33; P = .016). Conclusion In this large series of 174 revision THAs in patients with AS, the cumulative incidence of dislocation was 8% at 20 years. The 20-year cumulative incidence of any re-revision was 36%, which is similar to reported rates in patients with comparable demographic features without AS. Level of Evidence Level IV.

The direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a technique popular among some arthroplasty surgeons. There is currently a paucity of data regarding reasons for failure of THA using the DAA. The authors conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on 56 patients who underwent revision THA at their institution after failing primary THA that was performed through a DAA either at their institution (n=8) or elsewhere (n=48) from January 1, 2010, to June 1, 2017. Patients were grouped by modes of failure and compared using patient characteristics, surgical factors, and radiographic outcomes. Total hip arthroplasties performed through the DAA failed due to infection in 21 (38%) patients, aseptic/mechanical loosening in 14 (25%) patients, intraoperative fracture in 6 (11%) patients, postoperative fracture in 6 (11%) patients, tendinitis or pain of unknown etiology in 3 (5%) patients, metallosis in 3 (5%) patients, instability/dislocation in 2 (4%) patients, and leg length discrepancy in 1 (2%) patient. Patients who underwent revision due to unrecognized intraoperative fracture had a lower body mass index (BMI) and weight than patients who had failure due to postoperative fracture, aseptic loosening, or infection. The 4 most common modes of failure included infection, aseptic loosening, unrecognized intraoperative fracture, and postoperative fracture. Together, these made up 84% of failed DAA THAs. Patients with a lower BMI are more likely to have failure due to intraoperative fractures. Patients with a higher BMI are more likely to have failure due to postoperative fracture, aseptic loosening, or infection. [ Orthopedics . 2020;43(4);239–244.]

Background Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDSs) are connective-tissue disorders resulting in joint laxity. Soft-tissue stability is a concern in these patients when they undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA). Our purpose was to compare THAs in the population with EDS with a matched control undergoing THA for osteoarthritis. Methods Thirteen patients with EDS underwent THA from 1997 to 2017. Matching was 1:3 with a control group of patients who underwent THA for osteoarthritis. Matching was based on the gender, age, and length of follow-up. Results We found no difference in demographics or postoperative Harris Hip Scores between the cohorts (P > .05). Two patients (15.4%) with EDS and 2 patients (5.1%) in the control group suffered a dislocation. We found no difference in the reoperation or revision rate between the groups (P = .28). Conclusions Patients with EDS have a significant improvement in postoperative Harris Hip Scores after THA. These patients also have a high dislocation rate after surgery, and alternative approaches and technologies such as dual-mobility components should be considered to reduce the rate of dislocation in this population.

Background Resection arthroplasty of the hip is considered a viable option after multiple failed attempts to eradicate a prosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, much less information about resection arthroplasty of the knee is available. The goals of this study were to determine the success of infection eradication with a resection arthroplasty of the knee and subsequent functional outcomes in this group. Methods We retrospectively identified 25 knees (23 patients) treated with resection arthroplasty of the knee for PJI performed at a single institution between 1974 and 2016. The mean age at resection arthroplasty was 65 years. The mean body mass index was 37 kg/m2, and the mean Charleston Comorbidity Index was 5. Patients had a mean of 5 operations on the knee (mean of 3 operations for infection) before the resection arthroplasty. Failure to eradicate the infection was defined as any reoperation for infection. Clinical outcomes were assessed via ambulatory status, use of gait aids, and ongoing pain. The mean follow-up was 4 years. Results At most recent follow-up, 84% (21 of 25) of knees were free of infection. Three patients had recurrent infection within the first year, and 1 patient had a late infection at 4 years postoperatively. However, only 1 patient required a subsequent amputation. Forty-five percent were community ambulators, 35% were household ambulators, and 20% were only able to transfer. All patients required knee bracing and assistive devices. Fifteen percent of patients were using long-term narcotics. Conclusion This large series demonstrates the results of selected use of resection arthroplasty as a treatment for recalcitrant periprosthetic knee infections that have failed multiple attempts to eradicate an ongoing PJI. The resection definitively solved the infection in 84% of patients. Functional results were variable but surprisingly good in some. All patients required bracing and assistive devices.

Dislocation is the most common reason for early revision following total hip arthroplasty (THA). More than 40 years ago, Lewinnek et al. proposed an acetabular "safe zone" to avoid dislocation. While novel at the time, their study was substantially limited according to modern standards. The purpose of this study was to determine optimal acetabular cup positioning during THA as well as the effect of surgical approach on the topography of the acetabular safe zone and the hazard of dislocation.Primary THAs that had been performed at a single institution from 2000 to 2017 were reviewed. Acetabular inclination and anteversion were measured using an artificial intelligence neural network; they were validated with performance testing and comparison with blinded grading by 2 orthopaedic surgeons. Patient demographics and dislocation were noted during follow-up. Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression, including multidimensional analysis, was performed to define the 3D topography of the acetabular safe zone and its association with surgical approach.We followed 9,907 THAs in 8,081 patients (4,166 women and 3,915 men; 64 ± 13 years of age) for a mean of 5 ± 3 years (range: 2 to 16); 316 hips (3%) sustained a dislocation during follow-up. The mean acetabular inclination was 44° ± 7° and the mean anteversion was 32° ± 9°. Patients who did not sustain a dislocation had a mean anteversion of 32° ± 9° (median, 32°), with the historic ideal anteversion of 15° observed to be only in the third percentile among non-dislocating THAs (p0.001). Multivariable modeling demonstrated the lowest dislocation hazards at an inclination of 37° and an anteversion of 27°, with an ideal modern safe zone of 27° to 47° of inclination and 18° to 38° of anteversion. Three-dimensional analysis demonstrated a similar safe-zone location but significantly different safe-zone topography among surgical approaches (p = 0.03) and sexes (p = 0.02).Optimal acetabular positioning differs significantly from historic values, with increased anteversion providing decreased dislocation risk. Additionally, surgical approach and patient sex demonstrated clear effects on 3D safe-zone topography. Further study is needed to characterize the 3D interaction between acetabular positioning and spinopelvic as well as femoral-sided parameters.Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Recent advancements in bariatric surgical techniques have increased its utilization for the management of morbid obesity prior to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We hypothesized that bariatric surgery prior to primary TKA would mitigate postoperative complications and improve implant survivorship.A retrospective review from 1992-2020 identified 205 bariatric surgery patients with subsequent primary TKA. This cohort was matched 1:1:1 to patients without bariatric surgery and with BMI40 kg/mBariatric patients demonstrated higher revision rates than low (HR 4, P.01) and high BMI (HR 9, P.01) controls, and increased reoperations when compared to the low (HR 2, P.01) and high BMI (HR 6, P.01) groups. Reoperation for instability was more common in bariatric patients than low (HR 15, P = .01) and high BMI (HR 17, P.01) groups. Reoperation for infection was higher in bariatric patients relative to the high BMI (HR 6, P = .03), but not the low BMI cohort (HR 3, P = .06). There was no difference in 90-day complications (P = .33). Bariatric patients with high BMI and contemporary bariatric procedures did not significantly impact complications or survivorship, but bariatric surgery2 years before TKA was associated with higher revision rates (P = .01).This study found that bariatric surgery patients who undergo primary TKA have worse implant survivorship, mostly related to infection and instability. Further investigation into perioperative optimization is warranted.Prognostic Level IV.

BACKGROUND There is no consensus on managing severe patellar bone loss after total knee arthroplasty. We previously described an initial series involving a novel technique of patellar bone-grafting with a short follow-up. The purpose of this study was to determine long-term survivorship and the radiographic and clinical results of patellar bone-grafting during revision total knee arthroplasty in a larger series with an extended follow-up. METHODS We identified 90 patients from a single institution who underwent 93 patellar bone-grafting procedures for severe patellar bone loss from 1997 to 2014. The mean age of the patients was 70 years, and 46% of patients were female. Forty-five knees (48%) underwent first-time revisions, and 19 knees (20%) had undergone a failed attempt at patellar resurfacings. Intraoperative patellar caliper thickness increased from a mean of 7 to 25 mm after patellar bone-grafting (p < 0.01). Radiographic review determined changes in patellar height, tracking, and remodeling. Knee Society scores (KSSs) were calculated. The mean follow-up was 8 years (range, 2 to 18 years). Kaplan-Meier methods determined survivorship free of any revision and any reoperation. Cox proportional hazards analysis determined predictive factors for failure. RESULTS Survivorship free of patellar revision was 96% at 10 years. Survivorship free of any revision was 84% at 10 years. Survivorship free of any reoperation was 78% at 10 years. Increasing patient age was the only protective factor against further patellar revision (hazard ratio, 0.95; p < 0.01). When comparing initial radiographs with final radiographs, patellar height decreased from 22 to 19 mm (p < 0.01), 80% compared with 59% of patellae articulated centrally in the trochlea (p = 0.01), and 32% compared with 77% had remodeling over the lateral femoral condyle (p < 0.01). Anterior knee pain decreased from 51% to 27% postoperatively (p = 0.01). The mean knee flexion improved from 101° to 108° (p = 0.03). The mean KSS improved from 50 to 85 points (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Reliable long-term clinical results can be expected with patellar bone-grafting for severe patellar bone loss during revision total knee arthroplasty. Pain, range of motion, and other reported outcomes improve despite radiographic changes to patellar height, tracking, and remodeling. This technique is a durable and reliable option when standard patellar resurfacing is not possible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background Patients actively smoking at the time of primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) are at increased risk of perioperative complications. Employing strategies for smoking cessation has therefore become routine. A potential benefit of cessation in anticipation of TJA may be long-term cessation. However, success rates and the longevity of successful smoking cessation attempts before TJA have yet to be presented. Methods Our institution’s total joint registry documents self-reported smoking status. As such, all patients who underwent TJA from 2007 to 2018 were identified and grouped as nonsmokers, smokers (regularly smoking within 1 year before surgery), and former smokers (those who quit smoking within 1 year before surgery). Thereafter, postoperative smoking status was assessed with special attention to former smokers to see who remained smoke-free. Results From the 28,758 primary TJAs identified, 91.3% (26,244) were nonsmokers, 7.3% (2109) were smokers, and 1.4% (405) had quit smoking before surgery. Among former smokers, 86% were abstinent 1 year postoperatively but only 45% were still abstinent 8 years postoperatively. Conversely, 7% of smokers at the time of surgery eventually quit and 6% of prior nonsmokers started smoking over the same time period. Conclusion Despite concerted efforts to help patients stop smoking before TJA, 7.3% remain smokers. Among those who are successful, less than half (45%) remain smoke-free after surgery. Compared to current smokers, however, patients who managed to quit before surgery are more likely to remain smoke-free after surgery. These findings demonstrate the tremendous challenge smoking represents in contemporary TJA practices. Level of Evidence Therapeutic level III.