Search

PURPOSE: Nonclinical factors and cognitive biases have been shown to significantly affect clinical decision making. In this study, we aimed to identify clinical and environmental factors that might influence the decision to approve or reject image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) images in a large multisite institution. METHODS: We identified all IGRT image approval and rejection decisions recorded within an electronic imaging system from July 1, 2016, to June 30, 2018. For each decision, we tabulated the following parameters: the attending physician of the patient, the physician reviewing the image, total images reviewed by the physician that day, time of day, day of week, treatment site, and imaging modality (kilovoltage or cone beam computed tomography [CBCT]). We created a binary multivariable logistic regression model to identify factors associated with IGRT image rejection. RESULTS: Overall, of 51,797 total image records evaluated, 881 (1.70%) were rejected and 50,916 (98.30%) were approved. Univariable analysis revealed that images reviewed by physicians with high rejection rates (odds ratio [OR], 3.16; P < .001) and by physicians reviewing fewer IGRT images (OR, 0.99; P = .024), images from various anatomic sites (particularly skin, breast, and head and neck), and CBCT imaging compared with kilovoltage imaging (OR, 1.49; P < .001) were associated with the increased rate of rejection. On multivariable analysis, images reviewed by physicians with high rejection rates (OR, 3.28; P < .001), images from specific anatomic sites including breast ( P < .001), and CBCT imaging ( P < .001) persisted as independent predictors of image rejection. CONCLUSION: These data provide important insight into the clinical, cognitive, and environmental factors that might influence the routine clinical decision of IGRT image approval. Recognition of these factors may not only improve the quality of individual decisions but also identify opportunities for systems-based quality improvement in IGRT.

Short course radiation-based total neoadjuvant therapy can improve disease-free survival for patients with high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer. Tumors that involve or threaten the circumferential resection margin have a particularly high risk of local recurrence. Intraoperative radiation therapy enables treatment escalation at the threatened or involved margin at the time of surgery.Patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated with preoperative short course radiotherapy-based total neoadjuvant therapy and intraoperative radiation at the time of surgery were identified. All patients had a threatened or involved circumferential resection margin on magnetic resonance imaging at the time of diagnosis. Treatment details, radiation toxicities, postoperative complications and oncologic outcomes were recorded.Ten patients received intraoperative radiation after short course radiation-based total neoadjuvant therapy. All patients had an involved or threatened circumferential resection margin, 60% had extramural venous invasion, and 60% had positive lateral pelvic lymph nodes. Seven patients had negative surgical margins (≥ 2 mm), and 3 patients had an R1 resection with radial margins2 mm. The median [IQR] length of hospitalization after surgery was 11 [7-14] days. Three patients required readmission and 2 patients required reoperation due to complications including anastamotic leak and abscess. With a median follow up of 19.5 months postoperatively, no patient developed a pelvic recurrence, and 6 patients developed distant recurrences.The use of intraoperative radiation after a short course radiotherapy-based neoadjuvant therapy is safe and feasible. Further data are needed to determine whether the addition of intraoperative radiation improves local recurrence rates over preoperative radiation alone.

Definitive radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy is curative for nonmetastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA). However, the true effect of chemoradiation on long-term functional outcomes is poorly understood owing to limited follow-up and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 248 patients with SCCA treated with definitive intensity modulated radiation and concurrent chemotherapy from 2010 to 2018 who were alive and without recurrence. PRO measures were collected, including Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G7), Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQoL), Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS), and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaires (ICIQ). Models were used to determine the association between demographic, tumor, treatment, and dosimetric data with PROs.One hundred twelve (45%) patients completed PROs. Median [interquartile range (IQR)] time from radiation completion to survey was 51 [37-85] months. The median scores [IQR] for FACT-G7, FIQoL, and LARS were 21 [15-24], 14 [11-16], and 32 [25-37], respectively. For men, median subscores [IQR] for ICIQ voiding and incontinence subscores were 5 [2-6] and 1 [1-3], respectively. For women, median subscores [IQR] for ICIQ voiding, incontinence, and filling were 1 [1-3], 5 [3-8], and 4 [2-5], respectively. Higher (better) FIQoL scores were associated with higher (better) FACT-G7 scores (β = 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-1.09; P.001), and higher (worse) LARS scores were associated with lower (worse) FACT-G7 scores (β = -0.22; 95% confidence interval, -0.31 to -0.13; P.001). A separate multivariable analysis revealed higher bowel bag D1% was associated with lower (worse) FIQoL (P = .001) and higher (worse) LARS (P = .003) scores. Higher bladder V40 Gy was associated with increased (worse) ICIQ voiding subscore (P = .001).Patients treated with modern chemoradiation for SCCA experience significant long-term bowel toxic effects with considerable effect on quality of life. Minimizing bowel hotspots and bladder V40 Gy may improve bowel and urinary function. Other interventions to reduce long-term toxic effects and improve quality of life are needed.

Purpose: Journal impact factor (IF) is often used to measure research quality and importance. We assessed trial factors associated with the publication of cancer trials in journals with higher IF and publications receiving higher citations. Materials and Methods: Cancer-specific phase III RCTs were screened through https://clinicaltrials.gov. We identified trials with published primary endpoints, along with their corresponding journal IF and relative citation ratio (RCR). Results: Seven-hundred ninety manuscripts were included in our study. Trials that met their primary endpoint were more commonly published in journals with higher IF (Median IF: positive trials 35.4 vs. negative trials 26.3, P < 0.001). Furthermore, trials that led to subsequent FDA drug approvals were also published in journals with higher IF (Median IF: 59.1 vs. 26.3 in trials not leading to FDA approvals, P < 0.001). When analyzing RCR, trial positivity (meeting primary endpoint) was not associated with increased citations on multivariable analysis (P = 0.56). Lastly, publications of trials leading to FDA approvals (P < 0.001), and publications of trials in journals with higher IF (P < 0.001) were associated with increased RCR. Conclusions: Positive trials are commonly published in journals with high IF, but do not necessarily lead to increased citations. Moreover, trials published in journals with higher IF are more likely to receive increased citations.

Literature supporting the efficacy of complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) alongside radiotherapy is fragmented with varying outcomes and levels of evidence. This review summarizes the available evidence on CIM used with radiotherapy in order to inform clinicians. A systematic literature review identified studies on the use of CIM during radiotherapy. Inclusion required the following criteria: the study was interventional, CIM therapy was for human patients with cancer, and CIM therapy was administered concurrently with radiotherapy. Data points of interest were collected from included studies. A subset was identified as high-quality using the Jadad scale. Fisher’s exact test was used to assess the association between study results, outcome measured, and type of CIM. Overall, 163 articles met inclusion. Of these, 68 (41.7%) were considered high-quality trials. Articles published per year increased over time (p < 0.01). Frequently identified therapies were biologically based therapies (47.9%), mind-body therapies (23.3%), and alternative medical systems (13.5%). Within the subset of high-quality trials, 60.0% of studies reported a favorable change with CIM while 40.0% reported no change. No studies reported an unfavorable change. Commonly assessed outcome types were patient-reported (41.1%) and provider-reported (21.5%). Rate of favorable change did not differ based on type of CIM (p = 0.90) or outcome measured (p = 0.24). Concurrent CIM may reduce radiotherapy-induced toxicities and improve quality of life, suggesting that physicians should discuss CIM with patients receiving radiotherapy. This review provides a broad overview of investigations on CIM use during radiotherapy and can inform how radiation oncologists advise their patients about CIM.

In this review, we present the context of older adult (OA) cancer patients within the broader cancer population, including cancer burdens and trial representation. We first describe the proportion of older adults in clinical trials, with studies showing strong evidence that the proportion of OA in cancer trials is much less than the proportion of OA in the overall cancer population. We highlight the lack of generalizability that can lead to challenges in treatment decisions for OA as well as concerns regarding health inequity. We then discuss barriers to OA enrollment related to trial structure and design, physician perspective, and patient and/or caregiver perspective. We expand on this further by outlining these barriers throughout the process of trial design, patient enrollment/trial implementation, and data analysis in post-market settings. We summarize guidelines from national societies, regulatory agencies, and other institutional bodies, then present a compilation of on-the-ground actionable recommendations to address the challenges of clinical trial design, focusing on geriatric assessments and OA-specific trials. We conclude by providing an outline for future directions, noting specifically the potential impact that radiotherapy and radiation oncology may have on clinical trials related to OA patients.

We aimed to investigate whether implicit linguistic biases exist in letters of recommendation (LORs) for applicants to radiation oncology (RO) residency. LORs (n = 487) written for applicants (n = 125) invited to interview at a single RO residency program from the 2015 to 2019 application cycles were included for analysis. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) software was used to evaluate LORs for length and a dictionary of predetermined themes. Language was evaluated for gender bias using a publicly available gender bias calculator. Non-parametric tests were used to compare linguistic domain scores. The median number of the LORs per applicant was 4 (range 3–5). No significant differences by applicant gender were detected in LIWC score domains or gender bias calculator (P > 0.05). However, LORs for applicants from racial/ethnic backgrounds underrepresented in medicine were less likely to include standout descriptors (P = 0.008). Male writers were less likely to describe applicant characteristics related to patient care (P < 0.0001) and agentic personality (P = 0.006). LORs written by RO were shorter (P < 0.0001) and included fewer standout descriptors (P = 0.014) but were also more likely to include statements regarding applicant desirability (P = 0.045) and research (P = 0.008). While language was globally male-biased, assistant professors were less likely than associate professors (P = 0.0064) and full professors (P = 0.023) to use male-biased language. Significant linguistic differences were observed in RO residency LORs, suggesting that implicit biases related to both applicants and letter writers may exist. Recognition, and ideally eradication, of such biases are crucial for fair and equitable evaluation of a diverse applicant pool of RO residency candidates. Electronic supplementary material The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13187-020-01907-x.

Gamma Knife (GK) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is increasingly used as an initial treatment for patients with 10 or more brain metastases. However, the clinical and dosimetric consequences of this practice are not well established.We performed a single-institution, retrospective analysis of 30 patients who received Gamma Knife SRS for 10 or more brain metastases in 1 session. We utilized MIM Software to contour the whole brain and accumulated the doses from all treated lesions to determine the mean dose delivered to the whole brain. Patient outcomes were determined from chart review.Our cohort had a median number of 13 treated lesions (range 10-26 lesions) for a total of 427 treated lesions. The mean dose to the whole brain was determined to be 1.8 ± 0.91 Gy (range 0.70-3.8 Gy). The mean dose to the whole brain did not correlate with the number of treated lesions (Pearson r = 0.23, P = 0.21), but was closely associated with tumor volume (Pearson r = 0.95, P0.0001). There were no significant correlations between overall survival and number of lesions or aggregate tumor volume. Fourteen patients (47%) underwent additional SRS sessions and 6 patients (20%) underwent whole-brain radiotherapy with a median of 6.6 months (range 3.0-50 months) after SRS. Two patients (6.6%) developed grade 2 radionecrosis following SRS beyond earlier whole-brain radiotherapy.The mean dose to the whole brain in patients treated with Gamma Knife SRS for 10 or more brain metastases remained low with an acceptable rate of radionecrosis. This strategy allowed the majority of patients to avoid subsequent whole-brain radiotherapy.

We have previously shown that ablative radiotherapy (A-RT) with a biologically effective dose (BED10) ≥ 80.5 Gy for patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is associated with longer survival. Despite recent large-scale sequencing efforts in ICC, outcomes following RT based on genetic alterations have not been described. We reviewed records of 156 consecutive patients treated with A-RT for unresectable ICC from 2008 to 2020. For 114 patients (73%), next-generation sequencing provided molecular profiles. The overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate and multivariable Cox analyses were used to determine the associations with the outcomes. The median tumor size was 7.3 (range: 2.2–18.2) cm. The portal vein thrombus (PVT) was present in 10%. The RT median BED10 was 98 Gy (range: 81–144 Gy). The median (95% confidence interval) follow-up was 58 (42–104) months from diagnosis and 39 (33–74) months from RT. The median OS was 32 (29–35) months after diagnosis and 20 (16–24) months after RT. The one-year OS, LC, and intrahepatic DMFS were 73% (65–80%), 81% (73–87%), and 34% (26–42%). The most common mutations were in IDH1 (25%), TP53 (22%), ARID1A (19%), and FGFR2 (13%). Upon multivariable analysis, the factors associated with death included worse performance status, larger tumor, metastatic disease, higher CA 19-9, PVT, satellitosis, and IDH1 and PIK3CA mutations. TP53 mutation was associated with local failure. Further investigation into the prognostic value of individual mutations and combinations thereof is warranted.

Purpose:Gamma Knife (GK) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is increasingly used as an initial treatment for patients with ten or more brain metastases (BM). However, the clinical and dosimetric consequences of this practice are not well established.Methods: We performed a single institution, retrospective analysis of 30 patients who received GK SRS for ten or more BM in one session. We utilized MIM Software to contour the whole brain and accumulated the doses from all treated lesions to determine the mean dose delivered to the whole brain. Patient outcomes were determined from chart review. Results: Our cohort had a median number of 13 treated lesions (range 10 to 26 lesions) for a total of 427 treated lesions. The mean dose to the whole brain was determined to be 1.8 ± 0.91 Gy (range 0.70 to 3.8 Gy). Mean dose to the whole brain did not correlate with the number of treated lesions (Pearson r=0.23, p=0.21), but was closely associated with tumor volume (Pearson r=0.95, pConclusion: The mean dose to the whole brain in patients treated with GK SRS for 10 or more BM remained low with an acceptable rate of radionecrosis. This strategy allowed the majority of patients to avoid subsequent WBRT.

Purpose Prior research suggests that patient education materials on radiation therapy from various professional groups are written at reading levels above national recommendations of sixth to eighth grade. Since publication of these initial findings, many materials from these sources have been updated or newly created. However, the extent to which readability was considered in the design of these new documents remains unknown. Therefore, the goal of this investigation was to evaluate readability of online education materials for radiation therapy, comparing readability of updated materials with those included in the previous study. Methods and Materials Patient education materials related to radiation oncology were identified from websites of the 3 professional societies used in the original investigation (the American College of Radiology, the American Cancer Society, and the American Society for Radiation Oncology). The documents included in the first analysis were used as a comparator. To allow for accurate evaluation across groups, materials were matched by content; when necessary, documents were combined from the original cohort to create topically equivalent materials to reflect those currently available on society websites. Identified materials were analyzed using 7 validated readability indices, and results are reported in grade-level equivalents. Original materials were also reanalyzed with the same method. Results American Cancer Society materials had the lowest average baseline levels (9.4-11.3 grade level) and showed improved readability in the more recent materials (8.0-10.5 grade level). By contrast, the American Society for Radiation Oncology materials had high average baseline readability levels (11.1-13.9 grade level) that actually worsened in the more recent materials (11.7-16.2 grade level). The number of documents meeting national recommendations did not improve in the updated cohort. Conclusion Despite evidence that readability levels of patient education materials in radiation oncology are unacceptably high, the readability of newly created materials is not consistently improving across professional societies. Although certain groups may incorporate readability in the design of educational documents, more consistent consideration across all organizations is needed.

Background Little is known about the readability and utility of patient education materials for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Therefore, the goal of this investigation was to evaluate such materials from high-performing neurosurgery hospitals and professional societies through an analysis of readability and educational content. Methods In this cross-cross sectional study, 61 websites associated with the top 50 neurosurgery and neurology hospitals according to U.S. News & World Report (USNWR) and 11 predetermined professional medical societies were queried. Identified SRS education materials were analyzed by 6 readability indices. Educational content was assessed by 10 criteria based on surveys of patients’ perspectives about SRS. Results Fifty-four materials were identified from the target population (45 from USNWR hospital websites and 9 from professional society websites). Mean readability of materials ranged from 11.7 to 15.3 grade level, far more difficult than national recommendations of sixth and eighth grade. Materials were found to have deficiencies in educational content. Compared with high-performing hospitals, materials from websites of professional societies were longer (P = .002), and more likely to discuss risks and benefits specific to SRS (P = .008), alternative treatment options (P = .05) and expected outcomes or postprocedure descriptions (P = .004). Hospital materials were also more likely to favor brand-specific terminology (eg, GammaKnife) over generic terminology (eg, radiosurgery; P = .019). Conclusion Publicly available online patient educational materials for SRS are written at reading levels above national recommendations. Furthermore, many lack information identified as important by patients. Reevaluation and improvement of online SRS educational materials on a national scale are warranted.

BACKGROUND: As exemplified in patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC), metastatic salivary gland cancers display heterogenous behavior. Although anatomic site of metastasis has been suggested to be prognostic for survival in this population, this is not adequately characterized in the current literature. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), patients with newly diagnosed metastatic salivary gland cancers with distant metastasis to a single organ were identified. RESULTS: Eight hundred and fifty-eight patients (n = 284 bone-only, n = 322 lung-only, n = 252 other-site-only) were identified. Anatomic site of distant metastasis was not associated with survival in the cohort as a whole; however, on pre-planned subgroup analysis, lung-only metastasis, relative to bone-only metastasis, was the only factor associated with improved survival in patients with ACC (HR: 0.52, 95%CI: 0.30-0.93, p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic site of metastasis is strongly associated with survival in patients with metastatic ACC and should be considered in future studies aiming to optimize therapy in this population.

Introduction/Background Myeloid sarcoma is a rare extramedullary manifestation of immature myeloid/monocyte cells. Radiotherapy (RT) yields good local control, but data on different fractionation schemes are limited. The goal of this retrospective study was to share our institutional experience and assess volumetric regression with differential fractionation. Materials and Methods We evaluated patients treated for myeloid sarcoma between 2000 and 2019 and categorized them into Group A (treated with RT) and Group B (no RT). We assessed local control using cumulative incidence function analysis. Post-treatment imaging sequences were analyzed for volumetric calculations. Results Forty-four patients with 80 lesions were assessed. Twenty-three patients with 52 lesions received RT (Group A), and 6 lesions received a single fraction of RT. There were 2 instances of local progression in Group A and 8 in Group B, with a cumulative incidence function estimate of local progression in Group A of 2.4% at 1 year and 6.9% at 2 years, significantly reduced compared to 29.7% and 35.5% in Group B, respectively (hazard ratio 0.13 [95% confidence interval 0.030.63], P = .011). No lesion treated with a single fraction of RT developed local progression. Volumetric analysis for 19 chronologically followed lesions (including 3 treated with a single fraction) revealed no difference in regression between single or multi-fraction treatment. Conclusion RT for myeloid sarcoma yields excellent local control and may be as effective in a single fraction as more protracted courses, though this requires validation. For a diagnosis associated with poor survival, a single palliative fraction may be optimal with potential for higher utilization.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Accessible, patient-centered educational resources improve health literacy and patient outcomes. Readability standards help create educational resources that are effective and comprehensible for most patients. However, many United States (US) professional societies fail to meet these standards. Language access is also an important consideration in treating an increasingly diverse and multilingual patient population. This study assesses the availability and readability of radiotherapy patient education resources, available in non-English languages, from three major US professional societies. We hypothesized that there would be limited available non-English resources, and that these resources would fail to meet recommended national readability levels. MATERIALS/METHODS Patient education resources in non-English languages were collected from the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), the American Cancer Society (ACS), and a collaboration between the American College of Radiology and Radiological Society of North America (ACR/RSNA). Number of English resources were tabulated. The text from each non-English resource was extracted and analyzed using 4 previously validated Spanish readability indices that provide grade level equivalents: Gilliam-Pena-Mountain (GPM), Lasbarhetsindex (Lix), Rate Index (Rix), and Spanish Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SOL). One-sided t-test was used for comparisons to national standards. Fisher's exact test was used to assess for differences in proportions. RESULTS Of 51 identified English resources, 35 (69%) had a Spanish counterpart. English materials from ACR/RSNA were more likely than ACS and ASTRO materials to have a provided Spanish counterpart (100% vs 75% vs 24%, respectively; P < 0.01) There were no resources available in other languages. Mean readability levels for all resources in Spanish ranged from 10.0 to 12.0 grade levels, depending on the index, and were at a high school level: ACS (GPM, Lix, Rix, SOL) 9.0, 11.0, 11.2, 10.5; ASTRO 10.0, 11.0, 10.3, 9.6; and ACR/RSNA 10.0, 12.0, 11.8, 11.2. Using the most permissive scores for each resource, ACS had the only resources at or below the 8th grade level (50%, P < 0.01). The most permissive mean scores of all organizations significantly exceeded 6th grade levels (P < 0.01) and only ACS did not exceed an 8th grade level (P = 0.05). CONCLUSION Limited resources are available in non-English languages for patients undergoing radiotherapy in the US. Spanish was the only language with available translations. Available Spanish resources did not meet readability standards from the American Medical Association (6th grade) and National Institutes of Health (8th grade). These findings demonstrate a paucity of non-English language resources, and the need to improve readability levels in Spanish radiotherapy patient education resources.

Comprehensive patient education is necessary for shared decision-making. While patient–provider conversations primarily drive patient education, patients also use published materials to enhance their understanding. In this investigation, we evaluated the readability of 2585 patient education materials published in high-impact medical journals from 1998 to 2018 and compared our findings to readability recommendations from national groups. For all materials, mean readability grade levels ranged from 11.2 to 13.8 by various metrics. Fifty-four (2.1%) materials met the American Medical Association recommendation of sixth grade reading level, and 215 (8.2%) met the National Institutes of Health recommendation of eighth grade level. When stratified by journal and material type, general medical education materials from Annals of Internal Medicine were the most readable ( P < .001), with 79.8% meeting the eighth grade level. Readability did not differ significantly over time. Efforts to standardize publication practice with the incorporation of readability evaluation during the review process may improve patients’ understanding of their disease processes and treatment options.

OBJECTIVES Our understanding of odontogenic cancers is limited primarily to case studies given the rarity of these head and neck neoplasms. Using the National Cancer Database, we report the treatment patterns and survival outcomes for one of the largest cohorts of patients with odontogenic cancers. METHODS Patients with odontogenic tumors who did not have metastatic disease and received at least part of their care at the reporting facility were included. Patient and treatment variables were assessed using logistic regression. Survival was assessed using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS We identified 437 patients with odontogenic cancers, the majority of which had malignant ameloblastoma (n = 203) or odontogenic carcinoma (n = 217). Median follow-up was 44.8 months. On multivariate analysis, improved survival was associated with age

Literature supporting the efficacy of complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) alongside radiotherapy is fragmented with varying outcomes and levels of evidence. This review summarizes the available evidence on CIM used with radiotherapy in order to inform clinicians.A systematic literature review identified studies on the use of CIM during radiotherapy. Inclusion required the following criteria: the study was interventional, CIM therapy was for human patients with cancer, and CIM therapy was administered concurrently with radiotherapy. Data points of interest were collected from included studies. A subset was identified as high-quality using the Jadad scale. Fisher's exact test was used to assess the association between study results, outcome measured, and type of CIM.Overall, 163 articles met inclusion. Of these, 68 (41.7%) were considered high-quality trials. Articles published per year increased over time (p0.01). Frequently identified therapies were biologically based therapies (47.9%), mind-body therapies (23.3%), and alternative medical systems (13.5%). Within the subset of high-quality trials, 60.0% of studies reported a favorable change with CIM while 40.0% reported no change. No studies reported an unfavorable change. Commonly assessed outcome types were patient-reported (41.1%) and provider-reported (21.5%). Rate of favorable change did not differ based on type of CIM (p = 0.90) or outcome measured (p = 0.24).Concurrent CIM may reduce radiotherapy-induced toxicities and improve quality of life, suggesting that physicians should discuss CIM with patients receiving radiotherapy. This review provides a broad overview of investigations on CIM use during radiotherapy and can inform how radiation oncologists advise their patients about CIM.

Purpose Although mentorship is described extensively in academic medical literature, there are few descriptions of mentorship specific to radiation oncology. The goal of the current study was to investigate the state of mentorship in radiation oncology through a scoping review of the literature. Methods and Materials A search protocol was defined according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Predefined search terms and medical subject headings were used to search PubMed for English language articles published after January 1, 1990, on mentorship in radiation oncology. Additionally, in-press articles from major radiation oncology and medical education journals were searched. Three reviewers determined article eligibility. Included articles were classified based on predefined evaluation criteria. Results Fourteen publications from 2008 to 2019 met inclusion criteria. The most commonly described form of mentorship was the dyad (64.3%), followed by team (14.3%) and peer (7.1%); 2 articles did not specify mentorship type (14.3%). The most commonly mentored participants were residents (35.7%), followed by medical students (35.7%) and attendings (21.4%); 1 study included participants of all levels (7.1%). Thirteen studies (92.9%) identified an experimental study design, most of which were cross-sectional (42.9%), followed by cohort studies (28.6%) and before/after (21.4%). Median sample size, reported in 12 of 13 experimental studies, was 132 (coefficient of variation, 1.06). Although outcomes varied widely, the majority described successful implementation of mentorship initiatives with high levels of participant satisfaction. Conclusions Although few initiatives are currently reported, the present study suggests that these initiatives are successful in promoting career development and increasing professional satisfaction. The interventions overwhelmingly described mentorship dyads; other forms of mentorship are either less common or understudied. Limitations included interventions not being evaluated in a controlled setting, and many were assessed using surveys with low response rates. This review highlights rich opportunities for future scholarship to develop, evaluate, and disseminate radiation oncology mentorship initiatives.

Purpose/objectives Three‐dimensional (3D) printing is recognized as an effective clinical and educational tool in procedurally intensive specialties. However, it has a nascent role in radiation oncology. The goal of this investigation is to clarify the extent to which 3D printing applications are currently being used in radiation oncology through a systematic review of the literature. Materials/methods A search protocol was defined according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Included articles were evaluated using parameters of interest including: year and country of publication, experimental design, sample size for clinical studies, radiation oncology topic, reported outcomes, and implementation barriers or safety concerns. Results One hundred and three publications from 2012 to 2019 met inclusion criteria. The most commonly described 3D printing applications included quality assurance phantoms (26%), brachytherapy applicators (20%), bolus (17%), preclinical animal irradiation (10%), compensators (7%), and immobilization devices (5%). Most studies were preclinical feasibility studies (63%), with few clinical investigations such as case reports or series (13%) or cohort studies (11%). The most common applications evaluated within clinical settings included brachytherapy applicators (44%) and bolus (28%). Sample sizes for clinical investigations were small (median 10, range 1–42). A minority of articles described basic or translational research (11%) and workflow or cost evaluation studies (3%). The number of articles increased over time (P

Purpose Simulation-based medical education (SBME) is gaining prominence as a tool to meet Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education–mandated competency-based assessment educational goals. SBME is used in radiation oncology, although the type and extent are not clear. This study reports a systematic literature review designed to clarify the type and extent of radiation oncology SBME. Methods and Materials The systematic review focused on radiation oncology SBME literature. The methods followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The inclusion criteria were identified according to the PICOS (population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and setting) framework. The population included undergraduate, graduate, and continuing medical education learners. Studies were limited to English-language studies published on or after January 1, 1990, in peer-reviewed journals. PubMed, MedEdPORTAL, and in-press articles were searched. The PubMed search was conducted using predefined search terms. References and similar articles were examined. Medical Subject Headings terms in selected articles were reviewed to ensure relevant terms were included. Results Fifty-four SBME publications met the inclusion criteria. Only 9 of 54 studies (17%) self-identified as SBME. SBME types included screen-based simulators (56%), simulated environments (13%), virtual reality and haptic systems (13%), simulated patients (11%), part-task trainers (6%), and computer-based systems with mannequins (2%). A variety of radiation oncology skill sets were addressed, including contouring (54%), treatment planning (20%), clinical decision making (17%), anatomy and/or radiology (13%), radiation biology and/or physics (13%), communication skills and/or patient education (13%), brachytherapy (13%), and immobilization (11%). A target learning population was defined in 47 studies, including residents (53%), attending physicians (36%), medical students (21%), medical physicists (11%), radiation therapists (9%), nurses (6%), administrative staff (4%), and dosimetrists (4%). Learner feedback was reported in 32 studies. Conclusions Overall, this systematic literature review provides context and guidance for future radiation oncology SBME development. Appropriately framing SBME reports in the radiation oncology literature will facilitate development, implementation, and evaluation of SBME interventions. SBME resources should be centralized to facilitate dissemination and share resources.

This cross-sectional study evaluates the gender distribution among chief executives and senior leaders at US health care organizations.

Early stage glottic cancer has traditionally been treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT). However, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has been recently adopted as an alternative to decrease toxicity. Here, we compared the usage and outcomes of IMRT and 3DCRT for patients with early stage squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the glottic larynx. Using the National Cancer Database, we identified patients with Stage I&ndash, II SCC of the glottis who received 55&ndash, 75 Gy using IMRT (n = 1623) or 3DCRT (n = 2696). Median follow up was 42 months with a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 72%. Using a nominal logistic regression, race, ethnicity, year of diagnosis and fraction size were associated with the receipt of IMRT (p &lt, 0.05). Using Kaplan&ndash, Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models as well as a propensity matched cohort, there was no difference in OS for patients who received IMRT versus 3DCRT (hazard ratio (HR), 1.08, 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.93&ndash, 1.26, p = 0.302). However, there was a survival benefit for patients receiving slight hypofractionation as compared to conventional fractionation (HR, 0.78, 95% CI, 0.69&ndash, 0.92, p = 0.003). IMRT was associated with similar survival as 3DCRT, supporting the implementation of this potentially less toxic modality without compromising survival.

BACKGROUND This retrospective study evaluated the relationship between histologic subtype and treatment outcomes following SRS for the treatment of multiple brain metastases (MBM). METHODS We analyzed patients with MBM, defined here as >= 3 lesions, treated with SRS at our institution. Primary histologies examined were NSCLC, breast, and melanoma. Patients were categorized according to histology-specific subtypes (NSCLC-EGFR, ALK, KRAS, PD-L1%; breast-HER2, ER, PR; melanoma-BRAF). The primary outcome was local control (defined by RANO-BM) and secondary outcomes included intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS 141 patients met inclusion criteria (66 NSCLC, 61 breast, and 14 melanoma). HER2+ and BRAF V600E+ lesions had increased rates of local control following SRS (P=0.0048 and P=0.0256, respectively) compared to other breast/melanoma subtypes. EGFR mutation was not associated with increased local control with SRS (71 vs 74%), but increased iPFS (P=0.0031). On multivariable analysis, EGFR+ was independently associated with a decreased time-dependent risk of death (P=0.011). The use of progressively newer generations of EGFR-directed therapies was associated with stepwise decreasing risk of intracranial progression and death. HER2+ disease had improved iPFS and OS (P=0.0058 and P< 0.0001, respectively; it was not an independent risk factor for progression or death; however, the use of HER2-directed antibodies was associated with decreased risk of death (p=0.036). The use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (i.e. lapatanib) was not associated with improvements, although this was a small subset. CONCLUSIONS Some histologic subtypes appear to have better control with SRS, with HER2+ breast cancer and BRAF V600E+ melanoma associated with improved outcomes – this requires further validation; a volumetric analysis is pending. This the protective effect of EGFR mutation appears to be partly related to use of EGFR inhibitors, with the use of newer-generation therapies leading to improved outcomes; although local control with SRS remains excellent regardless of the mutation.

11044 Background: Despite an increasing number of female physicians in the workforce, a gender disparity remains in many leadership roles in medicine. Endowed chairs can provide a multitude of research and career opportunities; thus, they are coveted positions in academic medicine. We examined factors associated with holding endowed chairs in oncology across the US, with a focus on whether a gender difference existed, as has been demonstrated in top internal medicine departments more generally. Methods: In 2019, we identified 95 academic oncology divisions/departments in the US, using the Oncology Division Chiefs & Department Chairs listing in the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) myConnection forum to define the institutions included. We requested a list of full professors and endowed chairs in those divisions/departments, relying on public data on websites when an institution did not respond. Using public data (e.g., institutional websites, NIH reporter, Scopus, state licensing boards), we collected information on gender, degree, total NIH funding as PIs, H-indices, publication and citation numbers, and graduation year for these individuals. We then created a multivariable logistic regression model to examine if, after controlling for other variables, gender was independently associated with an increased likelihood of holding an endowed chair. Results: One thousand thirty-three oncology full professors were identified, 290 (25.6%) of whom held endowed chairs. Overall, and in an adjusted model, greater research productivity (as measured through publications, citations, and h-index) and greater levels of NIH funding were significantly associated with having an endowed chair. Gender was not significantly associated with endowed chair status (21.9% [95% CI:17.2-27.3] of females and 26.8% [23.8-29.9] for males held endowed chairs; p = 0.11) on bivariable analysis, nor was it significant in the adjusted multivariable model (p = 0.50). Power to detect the observed difference given the total number of professors and their gender distribution was found to be ̃53%, suggesting a 47% chance of failing to reject the null hypothesis of equal gender distributions in endowed chairs when the observed difference is as large as estimated. Conclusions: Among oncology full professors, gender was not significantly associated with endowed chair status, although the number of professors in this field is too small to definitively rule out a modest gender difference. This finding contrasts with prior work that revealed a more substantial difference by gender that remained significant after controlling for other factors in a study, including all divisions in the Departments of Internal Medicine at top medical institutions. Further work is necessary to understand what specialty-specific and institutional cultural factors may help mitigate challenges in the pursuit of equity, diversity, and inclusion.

11032 Background: The open access (OA) publishing model represents an exciting opportunity to facilitate dissemination of scientific information to global audiences. In contrast to many traditional models, which require readers to pay subscription fees or rely upon institutional subscriptions for article access, the OA model grants free access to all consumers. However, OA publication is often associated with significant article processing charges (APCs) for authors, which may thus serve as a barrier to publication. In this investigation, we aimed to identify journal-level factors associated with OA publication costs in oncology journals. Methods: We identified oncology journals using the SCImago Journal & Country Rank database. All journals under the “Oncology” category that offer an OA publishing option with APC data openly available were included. For all journals, we searched journal websites and tabulated journal characteristics, including APC amount (USD), OA model (hybrid vs full), journal 2-year impact factor (IF), H-index, number of citable documents, primary treatment modality (surgery, radiation, medical, non-specific), treatment site (e.g. breast, etc), and continent of origin. Pearson correlation was used to evaluate univariate linear relationships between variables; for variables with significant correlation, we generated a multiple regression model to identify journal characteristics independently associated with OA APC amount. Results: Of 367 oncology journals screened, 266 met final inclusion criteria. The median APC was 2810 USD (range 0 – 5200). On univariate linear correlation regression testing, journals with the full OA model (p < 0.001), higher journal IF (p < 0.001), higher H-index (p < 0.001), greater number of published articles (p < 0.001), and those from North America or Europe (p < 0.001) tended to have higher OA publishing costs. When these co-variates were analyzed in a multiple regression model, only full OA status (p < 0.001), higher IF (p < 0.001), and North American or European origin (p < 0.001) persisted as independently associated with greater OA APC. Conclusions: Large APCs may serve as a barrier to OA publication and therefore create or exacerbate disparities among scientific investigators seeking to share their research. In this investigation, we find that OA publication costs are greater in oncology journals that utilize the hybrid OA model, have higher IF, and are based in North America or Europe. These findings may inform targeted action to help the oncology community fully appreciate the benefits of open science.

Signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) is a subtype of adenocarcinoma characterized histologically by cells with abundant intracellular mucin production, creating a distinctive “signet-ring” appearance. SRCC typically arises in tissues of the gastrointestinal tract. In the breast, SRCC is a rare subtype of invasive lobular carcinoma defined by the presence of signet-ring cells. Mammary SRCC has unique patterns of metastatic spread compared to more common breast cancers, more often spreading viscerally to involve the serosal surfaces of stomach, urinary tract, and spleen. We report a case of metastatic mammary SRCC presenting in the stomach, thereby mimicking primary gastric SRCC. Recognition of this unusual presentation is critical as treatments for these malignancies are vastly different; misdiagnosis could lead to significant morbidity and mortality for patients.

PURPOSE Radiotherapy (RT) is an essential component in the adjuvant treatment of glioblastoma (GBM); however, despite an initial benefit in tumor control, recurrence is nearly universal. The inflammasome is a multimeric cytosolic complex that has been shown to be activated in immune cells following RT. We investigated the relationship of inflammasome activation and disease progression after RT in GBM. METHODS We performed survival analysis for patients with recurrent GBM using the TCGA dataset, stratifying according to expression of inflammasome pathway molecules Caspase 1 (CASP1), IL-1β, and NLRP3. IL-1β expression and colocalization with CD11b+ myeloid cells were analyzed at different time points following RT in a murine glioma GL261 model. We detected the secreted IL-1β, CASP1 activity, and NLRP3 expression in both tumor and infiltrating immune cells, and the downstream effects of their interplay, including cellular apoptosis, proliferation, and viability. RESULTS High expression of CASP1, IL-1β, and NLRP3 are associated with poor survival in recurrent GBM. In a mouse model, recurrent tumors after treatment with RT display higher levels of the inflammasome effector molecule IL-1β, which colocalizes with infiltrating CD11b+ myeloid cells. Using a co-culture system of tumor cell and M2 macrophages, we found that RT enhances inflammasome activation in both cell types, and this interaction restores the proliferative capacity of surviving tumor cells following treatment. RT induces the inflammasome pathway activation in the setting of an associated immune microenvironment rich in tumor-associated macrophages and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (TAM/MDSCs) and not in tumor cells alone. CONCLUSIONS Inhibition of the oncoprogressive crosstalk between GBM tumor cells and M2 macrophages, possibly through disruption of the inflammasome pathway, might be a potential therapeutic strategy with RT.

Importance Appropriate informed consent processes are crucial to preservation of patient autonomy and shared decision making. Although half of patients with cancer receive radiotherapy, it is unknown whether current consent practices are comprehensible for patients. Objective To characterize use, specificity, and readability of clinical informed consent forms for radiotherapy, hypothesizing that forms would be higher than the recommended sixth- to eighth-grade readability level. Design, Setting, and Participants This nationwide cross-sectional survey study and readability analysis was conducted from 2016 to 2018 and included 89 academic radiation oncology departments that were part of the 2016 Electronic Residency Application Service. Department leaders (clinical directors, chairs, and personal contacts of study authors) at academic radiation oncology departments were contacted via email. Main Outcomes and Measures Readability levels were measured by 7 validated readability indices, including the Ford, Caylor, Sticht (FORCAST) index for nonnarrative texts. Difficult words were identified usingThe Living Word Vocabulary, which describes the readability grade levels of 40 000 common words. Results Of 89 departments, 67 (75%) responded to questions and 57 (64%) provided 113 forms for analysis. Departments providing forms did not differ substantially from others in terms of region, residency size, research output, rural vs urban location, or public vs private institution status. All departments obtained patient written informed consent before radiotherapy; 38 (57%) used body site–specific forms. Using the most conservative (low-score) estimate, mean form readability ranged from grade level 10.6 to 14.2. By 7 distinct indices, only 9 (8%) of 113 forms met the recommended eighth-grade readability level, and 4 (4%) forms met a sixth-grade level. Not a single form met either recommendation based on the FORCAST index. Forms used an average of 7.2 difficult words. Body site–specific forms had considerably better readability than general consent forms. Conclusions and Relevance This nationwide study of informed consent practices for cancer treatment with radiotherapy demonstrates that while all US academic radiotherapy departments use written consent forms, it is rare for templates to meet the recommended readability levels for patient materials. These data suggest the need for reevaluation and modification of the approach to radiotherapy consent, ideally with guidance and templates designed by national professional organizations.

e23164 Background: Patient education (PE), the use of educational interventions to improve patient knowledge of healthcare, has been shown to reduce patient anxiety and facilitate shared decision making. In contrast to many other medical specialties, the state of radiation oncology (RO) PE is unclear. This scoping review aims to characterize the state of ROPE peer-review scholarship to describe strengths, identify gaps and guide future ROPE research. Methods: Predetermined medical subject headings and search terms were used to search PubMed for ROPE articles. Additional terms were identified from these articles and the search was repeated until no further articles were found. In-press articles in major RO and medical education (ME) journals were searched. English language articles published after 1/1/1990 that had a primary ROPE focus were included. Two independent reviewers performed the search and determined eligibility. Articles were categorized using the most predominant step of Kern’s six-step conceptual framework for ME curriculum development and the country and year of publication. Results: Of 11,756 identified articles, 182 met inclusion criteria. Articles per year increased over time (p < 0.01): 1990-1994 (5.5%); 1995-1999 (11.0%); 2000-2004 (13.7%); 2005-2009 (10.4%); 2010-2014 (25.8%); 2015-2019 (33.5%). Conceptual framework categorization was as follows: problem identification (22.0%); needs assessment (23.6%); goals and objectives (4.9%); education strategies (9.9%); implementation (7.7%); evaluation and feedback (31.9%). Regional breakdown was as follows with some articles spanning regions: Africa (1.1%); South America (2.2%); Asia (6.0%); Australia (15.4%); Europe (30.2%); North America (45.6%). Conclusions: Nearly half of articles are primarily problem identification or needs assessment (45.6%) which are descriptive in nature and only identify or clarify ROPE needs. Additionally while these results are limited to English language scholarship, there are significant regional maldistributions. Although there is an encouraging trend of increasing ROPE publications over time, this study identifies opportunities to further develop, implement and evaluate ROPE scholarship.