Search

Visual animals detect spatial variations of light intensity and wavelength composition. Opponent coding is a common strategy for reducing information redundancy. Neurons equipped with both spatial and spectral opponency have been identified in vertebrates but not yet in insects. The Drosophila amacrine neuron Dm8 was recently reported to show color opponency. Here, we demonstrate Dm8 exhibits spatio-chromatic opponency. Antagonistic convergence of the direct input from the UV-sensing R7s and indirect input from the broadband receptors R1–R6 through Tm3 and Mi1 is sufficient to confer Dm8’s UV/Vis (ultraviolet/visible light) opponency. Using high resolution monochromatic stimuli, we show the pale and yellow subtypes of Dm8s, inheriting retinal mosaic characteristics, have distinct spectral tuning properties. Using 2D white-noise stimulus and reverse correlation analysis, we found that the UV receptive field (RF) of Dm8 has a center-inhibition/surround-excitation structure. In the absence of UV-sensing R7 inputs, the polarity of the RF is inverted owing to the excitatory input from the broadband photoreceptors R1–R6. Using a new synGRASP method based on endogenous neurotransmitter receptors, we show that neighboring Dm8s form mutual inhibitory connections mediated by the glutamate-gated chloride channel GluClα, which is essential for both Dm8’s spatial opponency and animals’ phototactic behavior. Our study shows spatio-chromatic opponency could arise in the early visual stage, suggesting a common information processing strategy in both invertebrates and vertebrates.

With its regular, almost crystal-like structure, the fly optic lobe represents a particularly beautiful piece of nervous system, which consequently has attracted the attention of many researchers over the years. While the anatomy of the various cell types had been known from Golgi studies for long, their visual response properties could only recently be revealed thanks to the advent of cell-specific driver lines and genetically encoded indicators of neural activity. Furthermore, dense EM reconstruction of several columns of the fly optic lobe now provides information about the synaptic connections between the different cell types, and RNA sequencing sheds light on the transmitter systems and ionic conductances used for communication between them. Together with the molecular tools allowing for blocking and activating individual, genetically targeted cell types, the fly optic lobe can soon be one of the best-understood visual neuropils in neuroscience. In this review, we summarize what we have learned so far, and discuss the major difficulties that keep us from a complete understanding of visual processing in the fly optic lobe.

Summary Sensory systems need to reliably extract information from highly variable natural signals. Flies, for instance, use optic flow to guide their course and are remarkably adept at estimating image velocity regardless of image statistics. Current circuit models, however, cannot account for this robustness. Here, we demonstrate that the Drosophila visual system reduces input variability by rapidly adjusting its sensitivity to local contrast conditions. We exhaustively map functional properties of neurons in the motion detection circuit and find that local responses are compressed by surround contrast. The compressive signal is fast, integrates spatially, and derives from neural feedback. Training convolutional neural networks on estimating the velocity of natural stimuli shows that this dynamic signal compression can close the performance gap between model and organism. Overall, our work represents a comprehensive mechanistic account of how neural systems attain the robustness to carry out survival-critical tasks in challenging real-world environments.

Detecting the direction of motion contained in the visual scene is crucial for many behaviors. However, because single photoreceptors only signal local luminance changes, motion detection requires a comparison of signals from neighboring photoreceptors across time in downstream neuronal circuits. For signals to coincide on readout neurons that thus become motion and direction selective, different input lines need to be delayed with respect to each other. Classical models of motion detection rely on non-linear interactions between two inputs after different temporal filtering. However, recent studies have suggested the requirement for at least three, not only two, input signals. Here, we comprehensively characterize the spatiotemporal response properties of all columnar input elements to the elementary motion detectors in the fruit fly, T4 and T5 cells, via two-photon calcium imaging. Between these input neurons, we find large differences in temporal dynamics. Based on this, computer simulations show that only a small subset of possible arrangements of these input elements maps onto a recently proposed algorithmic three-input model in a way that generates a highly direction-selective motion detector, suggesting plausible network architectures. Moreover, modulating the motion detection system by octopamine-receptor activation, we find the temporal tuning of T4 and T5 cells to be shifted toward higher frequencies, and this shift can be fully explained by the concomitant speeding of the input elements.

Many animals rely on vision to detect, locate, and track moving objects. In Drosophila courtship, males primarily use visual cues to orient toward and follow females and to select the ipsilateral wing for courtship song. Here, we show that the LC10 visual projection neurons convey essential visual information during courtship. Males with LC10 neurons silenced are unable to orient toward or maintain proximity to the female and do not predominantly use the ipsilateral wing when singing. LC10 neurons preferentially respond to small moving objects using an antagonistic motion-based center-surround mechanism. Unilateral activation of LC10 neurons recapitulates the orienting and ipsilateral wing extension normally elicited by females, and the potency with which LC10 induces wing extension is enhanced in a state of courtship arousal controlled by male-specific P1 neurons. These data suggest that LC10 is a major pathway relaying visual input to the courtship circuits in the male brain.