Search

Background The effects of pharmacological blood-pressure-lowering on cardiovascular outcomes in individuals aged 70 years and older, particularly when blood pressure is not substantially increased, is uncertain. We compared the effects of blood-pressure-lowering treatment on the risk of major cardiovascular events in groups of patients stratified by age and blood pressure at baseline. Methods We did a meta-analysis using individual participant-level data from randomised controlled trials of pharmacological blood-pressure-lowering versus placebo or other classes of blood-pressure-lowering medications, or between more versus less intensive treatment strategies, which had at least 1000 persons-years of follow-up in each treatment group. Participants with previous history of heart failure were excluded. Data were obtained from the Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Triallists' Collaboration. We pooled the data and categorised participants into baseline age groups (Findings We included data from 358 707 participants from 51 randomised clinical trials. The age of participants at randomisation ranged from 21 years to 105 years (median 65 years [IQR 59–75]), with 42 960 (12·0%) participants younger than 55 years, 128 437 (35·8%) aged 55–64 years, 128 506 (35·8%) 65–74 years, 54 016 (15·1%) 75–84 years, and 4788 (1·3%) 85 years and older. The hazard ratios for the risk of major cardiovascular events per 5 mm Hg reduction in systolic blood pressure for each age group were 0·82 (95% CI 0·76–0·88) in individuals younger than 55 years, 0·91 (0·88–0·95) in those aged 55–64 years, 0·91 (0·88–0·95) in those aged 65–74 years, 0·91 (0·87–0·96) in those aged 75–84 years, and 0·99 (0·87–1·12) in those aged 85 years and older (adjusted pinteraction=0·050). Similar patterns of proportional risk reductions were observed for a 3 mm Hg reduction in diastolic blood pressure. Absolute risk reductions for major cardiovascular events varied by age and were larger in older groups (adjusted pinteraction=0·024). We did not find evidence for any clinically meaningful heterogeneity of relative treatment effects across different baseline blood pressure categories in any age group. Interpretation Pharmacological blood pressure reduction is effective into old age, with no evidence that relative risk reductions for prevention of major cardiovascular events vary by systolic or diastolic blood pressure levels at randomisation, down to less than 120/70 mm Hg. Pharmacological blood pressure reduction should, therefore, be considered an important treatment option regardless of age, with the removal of age-related blood-pressure thresholds from international guidelines. Funding British Heart Foundation, National Institute of Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford Martin School.

Mean Gradient (MG) elevation can be detected immediately after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or secondarily during follow-up. Comparisons and interactions between these two parameters and their impact on outcomes have not previously been investigated. This study aimed to identify incidence, influence on prognosis, and parameters associated with immediate high post-procedural mean transvalvular gradient (PPMG) and delayed mean gradient increase (6 to 12 months after TAVI, DMGI) in the FRANCE 2 (French Aortic National CoreValve and Edwards 2) registry. The registry includes all consecutive symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis who have undergone TAVI. Three groups were analyzed: (1) PPMG &lt, 20 mmHg without DMGI &gt, 10 mmHg (control), (2) PPMG &lt, 20 mmHg with DMGI &gt, 10 mmHg (Group 1), and (3) PPMG ≥ 20 mmHg (Group 2). From January 2010 to January 2012, 4201 consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled in the registry. Controls comprised 2078 patients. In Group 1(n = 131 patients), DMGI exceeded 10 mmHg in 5.6%, and was not associated with greater 4-years mortality than in controls (32.6% vs. 40.1%, p = 0.27). In Group 2 (n = 144 patients), PPMG was at least 20 mmHg in 6.1% and was associated with higher 4-year mortality (48.7% versus 40.1%, p = 0.005). A total of two-thirds of the patients with PPMG ≥ 20 mmHg had MG &lt, 20 mmHg at 1 year, with mortality similar to the controls (39.2% vs. 40.1%, p = 0.73). Patients with PPMG &gt, 20 mmHg 1 year post-TAVI had higher 4-years mortality than the general population of the registry, unlike patients with MG normalization.

Background The effects of pharmacological blood pressure lowering at normal or high-normal blood pressure ranges in people with or without pre-existing cardiovascular disease remains uncertain. We analysed individual participant data from randomised trials to investigate the effects of blood pressure lowering treatment on the risk of major cardiovascular events by baseline levels of systolic blood pressure. Methods We did a meta-analysis of individual participant-level data from 48 randomised trials of pharmacological blood pressure lowering medications versus placebo or other classes of blood pressure-lowering medications, or between more versus less intensive treatment regimens, which had at least 1000 persons-years of follow-up in each group. Trials exclusively done with participants with heart failure or short-term interventions in participants with acute myocardial infarction or other acute settings were excluded. Data from 51 studies published between 1972 and 2013 were obtained by the Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration (Oxford University, Oxford, UK). We pooled the data to investigate the stratified effects of blood pressure-lowering treatment in participants with and without prevalent cardiovascular disease (ie, any reports of stroke, myocardial infarction, or ischaemic heart disease before randomisation), overall and across seven systolic blood pressure categories (ranging from

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is common in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, the impact of CAD distribution before TAVR on short‐ and long‐term prognosis remains unclear. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that the long‐term clinical impact differs according to CAD distribution in patients undergoing TAVR using the FRench Aortic National CoreValve and Edwards (FRANCE‐2) registry. METHODS: FRANCE‐2 is a national French registry including all consecutive TAVR performed between 2010 and 2012 in 34 centers. Three‐year mortality was assessed in relation to CAD status. CAD was defined as at least 1 coronary stenosis >50%. RESULTS: A total of 4201 patients were enrolled in the registry. For the present analysis, we excluded patients with a history of coronary artery bypass. CAD was reported in 1252 patients (30%). Half of the patients presented with coronary multivessel disease. CAD extent was associated with an increase in cardiovascular risk profile and in logistic EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) (from 19.3% ± 12.8% to 21.9% ± 13.5%, P < 0.001). Mortality at 30 days and 3 years was 9% and 44%, respectively, in the overall population. In multivariate analyses, neither the presence nor the extent of CAD was associated with mortality at 3 years (presence of CAD, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78‐1.07). A significant lesion of the left anterior descending (LAD) was associated with higher 3‐year mortality (HR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.10‐1.87). CONCLUSIONS: CAD is not associated with decreased short‐ and long‐term survival in patients undergoing TAVR. The potential deleterious effect of LAD disease on long‐term survival and the need for revascularization before or at the time of TAVR should be validated in a randomized control trial.

BACKGROUND Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has revolutionized management of high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, survival and the incidence of severe complications have been assessed in relatively small populations and/or with limited follow-up. OBJECTIVES This report details late clinical outcome and its determinants in the FRANCE-2 (FRench Aortic National CoreValve and Edwards) registry. METHODS The FRANCE-2 registry prospectively included all TAVRs performed in France. Follow-up was scheduled at 30 days, at 6 months, and annually from 1 to 5 years. Standardized VARC (Valve Academic Research Consortium) outcome definitions were used. RESULTS A total of 4,201 patients were enrolled between January 2010 and January 2012 in 34 centers. Approaches were transarterial (transfemoral 73%, transapical 18%, subclavian 6%, and transaortic or transcarotid 3%) or, in 18% of patients, transapical. Median follow-up was 3.8 years. Vital status was available for 97.2% of patients at 3 years. The 3-year all-cause mortality was 42.0% and cardiovascular mortality was 17.5%. In a multivariate model, predictors of 3-year all-cause mortality were male sex (p = 2 of 4 (p < 0.001). Severe events according to VARC criteria occurred mainly during the first month and subsequently in < 2% of patients/year. Mean gradient, valve area, and residual aortic regurgitation were stable during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The FRANCE-2 registry represents the largest database available on late results of TAVR. Late mortality is largely related to noncardiac causes. Incidence rates of severe events are low after the first month. Valve performance remains stable over time. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 68: 1637-47) (C) 2016 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Background: The FRANCE-2 registry (French Aortic National Corevalve and Edwards) previously reported good early- and medium-term clinical and echocardiographic efficacy for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. We here report 5-year follow-up results from the registry. Methods: The registry includes all consecutive patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in France. Follow-up is scheduled at 30 days, 6 months, then annually from 1 to 5 years. Clinical events were defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria, and hemodynamic structural valve deterioration (SVD) was defined according to the consensus statement by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. Results: Between January 2010 and January 2012, 4201 patients were enrolled in 34 centers. Five-year vital status was available for 95.5% of patients; 88.1% had clinical evaluation or died. Overall, at 5 years, all-cause mortality was 60.8% (n=2478; 95% CI, 59.3% to 62.3%). The majority of cardiovascular events occurred in the first month after valve implantation, and incidence remained low thereafter, at P =0.1). Finally, in the population of patients with severe SVD, 1 patient (1.7%) experienced a stroke, and 8 patients presented ≥1 heart failure event (13.3%). Conclusions: The 5-year follow-up results of the FRANCE-2 registry represent the largest long-term data set available in a high-risk population. In surviving patients, the low rate of clinical events and the low level of SVD after 1 year support the long-term efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in both types of transcatheter prosthesis featuring in the registry.

Analysis of the causes, outcomes, and mortality of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis requiring the implantation of 2 valves during transcatheter aortic valve implantation was conducted from the French Aortic National CoreValve and Edwards 2 (FRANCE2) registry. Pre- and postprocedural data from 3,919 patients from January 2010 to December 2011 (CoreValve or Edwards) were collated and analyzed. Characteristics of patients requiring immediate second valve procedures were compared with those of the other patients. The 72 patients (1.8%) who underwent implantation of a second valve were studied. Indications were device malpositioning (72%) and embolization (28%). Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics of patients receiving 2 valves were comparable with those of the other patients. The 2-year survival rate was 51.7% for patients with 2 valves as opposed to 62.3% for those with 1 valve (p0.001). The need for a second valve was an independent predictor of all-cause (hazard ratio 2.32, 95% confidence interval 1.50 to 3.60, p0.001) and cardiovascular (hazard ratio 2.64, 95% confidence interval 1.35 to 5.15, p0.001) mortality at 2 years. During follow-up, clinical and echocardiographic data remained similar between the 2 groups. In conclusion, in the FRANCE2 study, the main causes for second valve implantation during the same procedure were malpositioning and embolization. Although the procedure was feasible, it was accompanied by excess mortality. Valve hemodynamic status was preserved during the course of follow-up.

Aim DIALOG assessed the prevalence and predictors of hypoglycaemia in patients with type 1 (T1DM) or insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in a real-life setting. Methods In this observational study, insulin-treated patients ( n =3048) completed prospective daily questionnaires reporting the frequency and consequences of severe/confirmed non-severe hypoglycaemia over 30 days. Patients ( n =3743) also retrospectively reported severe hypoglycaemia over the preceding year. Results In this prospective survey, 85.3% and 43.6% of patients with T1DM and T2DM, respectively, reported experiencing at least one confirmed hypoglycaemic event over 30 days, while 13.4% and 6.4%, respectively, reported at least one severe event. Hypoglycaemia frequency increased with longer duration of diabetes and insulin therapy. Strongly predictive factors for hypoglycaemia were previous hypoglycaemia, >2 injections/day, BMI 2 and duration of insulin therapy>10 years. HbA 1c level was not predictive of hypoglycaemia in either T1DM or T2DM. The confirmed hypoglycaemia rate was increased in the lowest compared with the highest tertile of HbA 1c in T1DM, but not T2DM. At the time of enrolment, physicians reported severe hypoglycaemia in 23.6% and 11.9% of T1DM and T2DM patients, respectively, during the preceding year; the retrospective survey yielded frequencies of 31.5% and 21.7%, respectively. Also, severe hypoglycaemia led to medical complications in 10.7% and 7.8% of events in T1DM and T2DM patients, respectively, over 30 days. Conclusion Using a unique combined prospective and retrospective approach, the DIALOG study found a relatively high frequency of hypoglycaemia among insulin-treated patients. These findings emphasize the importance of a patient-centred approach for managing diabetes in which hypoglycaemia risk evaluation is critical. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01628341.

Summary Background Some patients who are at high surgical risk because of multiple co-morbidities undergo balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) as a bridge therapy towards transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI). Aim The aim of this study was to compare the clinical course of patients with or without previous BAV who underwent TAVI and were included in the FRANCE 2 registry. Methods From January 2010 to December 2011, 3953 patients underwent TAVI. Survival analysis was done by multivariable regression and propensity-score analysis to adjust for confounders. Results Patients in the previous BAV group ( n = 664, 16.8%) were older than patients in the primary TAVI group. The logistic EuroSCORE I and the rates of co-morbidities and symptoms were higher in the previous BAV group. Procedural success was similar in both groups, as was postprocedural aortic regurgitation grade ≥ 2/4. The 1-month mortality rates from all causes were 12.5 and 8.7%, respectively, in the previous BAV and primary TAVI groups ( P = 0.001). The 1-month to 1-year mortality rates were similar in both groups. Previous BAV was not an independent predictor of 1-month mortality (hazard ratio 1.44, 95% confidence interval 0.90–2.34; P = 0.14) or 1-month to 1-year mortality. Conclusions Crude 1-month mortality was higher in patients with previous BAV. Nevertheless, precarious preoperative status, but not previous BAV, was associated with mortality, and is the only marker that should be considered as detrimental at the time of preTAVI reassessment.

Objectives The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence, impact, and predictors of cerebrovascular events (CVEs) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Background Several issues remain unresolved post-TAVR, including CVEs. Methods The FRANCE-2 (French Aortic Nation CoreValve and Edwards-2) registry prospectively included all patients who underwent TAVR in France and Monaco from January 2010 to October 2011. A total of 3,191 patients were analyzed. Six-month follow-up data were obtained. Events were adjudicated according to Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-1 definition. Results Of the cohort, 3.98% experienced a CVE: 55% were major strokes, 14.5% minor strokes, and 30.5% transient ischemic attacks. The mean delay for CVE occurrence was 2 days (interquartile range: 0 to 7 days) with 48.5% of CVEs occurring within 2 days. There was no statistically significant difference in CVE rate with regard to the type of valve (p = 0.899) and the access route (p = 0.128). Patients with a CVE more frequently had new-onset paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (13.6% vs. 7.6%; p = 0.015). During follow-up, the unadjusted mortality rate was higher in patients with a CVE (26% vs. 16.5%; p = 0.002). By multivariate analysis, only advanced age (odds ratio: 1.05; 95% confidence interval: 1.02 to 1.08; p = 0.02) and having 2 valves implanted (odds ratio: 3.13; 95 confidence interval: 1.40 to 7.05; p = 0.006) were associated with a significant risk of CVEs. Conclusions CVEs occur frequently after TAVR and are associated with an increased mortality rate. No difference exists in the CVE rate when exploring the type of valve or the access route. Advanced age and multiple valves implanted during the same procedure are predictors of CVE.

Background— Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) performed under local anesthesia (LA) is becoming increasingly common. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes in patients who underwent transfemoral-TAVI under general anesthesia (GA) and LA. Methods and Results— Data from 2326 patients in the French Aortic National CoreValve and Edwards 2 (FRANCE 2) registry who underwent transfemoral-TAVI were analyzed. During the study period, the percentage of LA procedures increased gradually from 14% in January 2010 to 59% in October 2011. The clinical outcomes for GA (n=1377) and LA (n=949) were compared. Numerous baseline characteristics differed between the 2 groups, and the use of transesophageal echocardiographic guidance was more common in GA than in LA (76.3% versus 16.9%; P P =0.41 and 91.6% versus 91.3%; P =0.69, respectively), whereas the incidence of postprocedural aortic regurgitation≥mild was significantly lower in GA than in LA (15.0% versus 19.1%; P =0.015). The groups were also analyzed using a propensity-matching model, including transesophageal echocardiographic usage (GA [n=401] versus LA [n=401]). This model indicated that there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the rates of 30-day survival (GA [91.4%] versus LA [89.3%]; P =0.27] and postprocedural aortic regurgitation≥mild (GA [12.7%] versus LA [16.2%]; P =0.19). Conclusions— The less invasive transfemoral-TAVI under LA is preferred in clinical settings and seems to be acceptable; however, the higher incidence of postprocedural aortic regurgitation is emphasized. Therapeutic efforts should be made to reduce such complications during transfemoral-TAVI under LA.

The purposes of the present study were to determine the impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on Valve Academic Research Consortium-defined outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). A total of 3,933 consecutive patients underwent TAVI from January 2010 to December 2011 in 34 centers and were included in the French national TAVI registry "FRANCE 2"; 895 (22.7%) had concomitant COPD, 3,038 (77.3%) did not. There were no significant differences in procedural characteristics or 30-day Valve Academic Research Consortium-defined outcomes between those with and without COPD. Multivariate regression analysis showed COPD to be an independent predictor of 1-year mortality and combined efficacy end point after adjustment for concomitant co-morbidities (hazard ratio 1.19, 95% confidence interval 1.005 to 1.41, p = 0.03 and hazard ratio 1.52, 95% confidence interval 1.29 to 1.79, p 0.001, respectively). The higher mortality rate at 1 year in patients with COPD was related to cardiovascular deaths (COPD 10.0% vs non-COPD 6.2%, p = 0.008). Subgroup analysis found that the effect of COPD on 1-year mortality rate was constant across different subgroups, especially the type of approach and the type of anesthesia subgroups. In conclusion, concomitant COPD in patients referred for TAVI characterizes a high-risk population. The excess in mortality is largely determined by a higher rate of cardiovascular deaths and exists regardless of the type of procedure performed and its results.

Introduction Regular monitoring of the international normalized ratio (INR) is crucial for dose adjustment of vitamin K antagonists (VKA) to maximize time in therapeutic range (TTR). We compared the use of a mobile electronic assistant INRPlus which proposes patient-specific fluindione doses, to standard fluindione management in a cluster randomized controlled study. Patients and Methods Twenty clusters of six general practitioners were randomized to adjust fluindione doses in VKA-treated patients either using INRPlus or according to routine practice. TTR was measured over 6 months, along with time spent above or below the recommended INR range, frequency of measurements and related complications. Results Of the 595 included patients, 551 were assessable (259 INRPlus, 292 control) and had a mean of 1.6 INR measurements/month. TTR was not significantly different between the two groups, 72.7% [Q1: 58.1%; Q3: 90%] in INRPlus patients and 71.2% [Q1: 54.8%; Q3: 88.2%] in control patients (p = 0.445). At least 60% time within reference ranges was reported in 73.4% of INRPlus patients and 67.1% of control patients (relative risk 1.09, 95%CI 0.98-1.22, p = 0.115). No significant differences were reported between the two groups for time outside reference ranges, frequency of measurements or complications. Eighty-two percent (82%) of patients complying with INRPlus-proposed doses spent more than 60% of TTR versus 66.9% of non-compliant patients and 67.1% of reference patients. Conclusions In this trial, the use of the INRPlus electronic assistant resulted in a non-significant improvement in TTR that may be due to a higher than expected TTR in the control group.

Objective Decision making for intervention in symptomatic aortic stenosis should balance the risks of surgery and of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We identified the factors associated with early mortality after TAVI and aimed to develop and validate a simple risk score. Methods A population of 3833 consecutive patients was randomly split into two cohorts comprising 2552 and 1281 patients, used respectively to develop and validate a scoring system predicting 30-day or in-hospital mortality. Results TAVI was performed using the Edwards Sapien prosthesis in 2551 (66.8%) patients and the Medtronic Corevalve in 1270 (33.2%). Approach was transfemoral in 2801 (73.4%) patients, transapical in 678 (17.8%), subclavian in 219 (5.7%) and other in 117 (3.1%). Early mortality was 10.0% (382 patients). A multivariate logistic model identified the following predictive factors of early mortality: age ≥90 years, body mass index 2 , New York Heart Association class IV, pulmonary hypertension, critical haemodynamic state, ≥2 pulmonary oedemas during the last year, respiratory insufficiency, dialysis and transapical or other (transaortic and transcarotid) approaches. A 21-point predictive score was derived. C-index was 0.67 for the score in the development cohort and 0.59 in the validation cohort. There was a good concordance between predicted and observed 30-day mortality rates in the development and validation cohorts. Conclusions Early mortality after TAVI is mainly related to age, the severity of symptoms, comorbidities and transapical approach. A simple score can be used to predict early mortality after TAVI. The moderate discrimination is however a limitation for the accurate identification of high-risk patients.

Background— Significant postprocedural aortic regurgitation (AR) is observed in 10% to 20% of cases after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The prognostic value and the predictors of such a complication in balloon-expandable (BE) and self-expandable (SE) TAVR remain unclear. Methods and Results— TAVR was performed in 3195 consecutive patients at 34 hospitals. Postprocedural transthoracic echocardiography was performed in 2769 (92%) patients of the eligible population, and these patients constituted the study group. Median follow-up was 306 days (Q1–Q3=178–490). BE and SE devices were implanted in 67.6% (n=1872) and 32.4% (n=897). Delivery was femoral (75.3%) or nonfemoral (24.7%). A postprocedural AR≥grade 2 was observed in 15.8% and was more frequent in SE (21.5%) than in BE-TAVR (13.0%, P =0.0001). Extensive multivariable analysis confirmed that the use of a SE device was one of the most powerful independent predictors of postprocedural AR≥grade 2. For BE-TAVR, 8 independent predictors of postprocedural AR≥grade 2 were identified including femoral delivery ( P =0.04), larger aortic annulus ( P =0.0004), and smaller prosthesis diameter ( P =0.0001). For SE-TAVR, 2 independent predictors were identified including femoral delivery( P =0.0001). Aortic annulus and prosthesis diameter were not predictors of postprocedural AR for SE-TAVR. A postprocedural AR≥grade 2, but not a postprocedural AR=grade 1, was a strong independent predictor of 1-year mortality for BE (hazard ratio=2.50; P =0.0001) and SE-TAVR (hazard ratio=2.11; P =0.0001). Although postprocedural AR≥grade 2 was well tolerated in patients with AR≥grade 2 at baseline (1-year mortality=7%), it was associated with a very high mortality in other subgroups: renal failure (43%), AR Conclusions— Postprocedural AR≥grade 2 was observed in 15.8% of successful TAVR and was the strongest independent predictor of 1-year mortality. The use of the SE device was a powerful independent predictor of postprocedural AR≥grade 2.

Suite a la demande de la Direction Generale de la Sante, une etude a ete mise en place afin d’evaluer les modalites d’utilisation de l’insuline glargine chez des patients diabetiques en conditions de pratique reelle en France, de decrire le niveau de controle glycemique obtenu et l’incidence des hypoglycemies observees. Il s’agissait d’une etude prospective, observationnelle, multicentrique, nationale de suivi sur un an d’une cohorte de patients diabetiques de type 1 (DT1) et de type 2 (DT2) traites depuis au moins un mois avec de l’insuline glargine et suivis pendant un an par des medecins generalistes, diabetologues et pediatres. L’analyse porte sur 1 707 patients, dont 609 patients DT1 et 1 097 patients DT2 (et un patient avec un diabete non determine). L’âge moyen des patients etait de 42,0 ± 19,4 ans pour les DT1 et de 67,0 ± 11,9 ans pour les DT2, 642 (58,5 %) patients etaient âges de 65 ans et plus et 325 (29,6 %) de 75 ans et plus. L’anciennete moyenne du diabete etait respectivement de 15,8 ± 12,5 et 14,0 ± 8,8 ans. Parmi les patients DT2, 57 % etaient naifs d’insuline avant l’initiation de l’insuline glargine (DT2-IN) et 43 % etaient deja traites par une insuline (DT2-IT). La raison de l’initiation de l’insuline glargine etait principalement un mauvais controle de la glycemie. L’utilisation de l’insuline glargine a conduit a une augmentation importante de l’utilisation du schema therapeutique basal-bolus chez les DT1 et DT2-IT, respectivement de 32 % a 84,7 % et de 8,4 % a 38,8 % et a une diminution du nombre d’antidiabetiques oraux associes chez les DT2-IN, ainsi que chez les patients âges de plus de 65 ans. La dose moyenne d’insuline glargine a l’inclusion etait de 24,2 U/j chez les DT1, de 31,6 U/j chez les DT2-IT et de 23,6 U/j chez les DT2-IN. Au cours du suivi, cette dose est restee stable pour les DT1, et a augmente chez les DT2 (atteignant 35 U/j pour les DT2-IT et 29,7 U/j pour les DT2-IN) La proportion de patients atteignant les objectifs glycemiques (HbA1c En conclusion, les resultats de cette etude en vie reelle ont montre un profil d’utilisation de l’insuline glargine en France conforme au bon usage et aux recommandations de prise en charge du patient diabetique conjointes de la HAS et de l’AFSSAPS en vigueur. Le controle glycemique, initialement ameliore suite a l’instauration de l’insuline glargine, s’est maintenu pendant le suivi a 12 mois. Une augmentation du nombre de patients atteignant l’objectif d’HbA1c (

We updated the 2002 Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration meta-analysis of antiplatelet therapy to assess the effects of aspirin alone in the secondary prevention of different types of thrombotic arterial disease. Results of randomized, placebo-controlled trials of aspirin in patients with confirmed cardiovascular disease were abstracted and synthesized by the Mantel-Haenszel method. We defined three cardiovascular disease groups according to the qualifying disease at entry: coronary artery disease (CAD), cerebrovascular disease (CRVD), and peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Results are given as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Compared with placebo, aspirin decreased significantly the risk of all-cause death in CAD and CRVD (OR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.75-0.86 and 0.91, 95% CI 0.85-0.98, respectively), and of vascular events in CAD, CRVD, and PAD (OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.67-0.76, 0.87, 95% CI 0.82-0.93, and 0.50, 95% CI 0.29-0.88, respectively). The risk of non-fatal stroke was decreased in the CAD, CRVD, and PAD (OR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.50-0.83, 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.89, and 0.26, 95% CI 0.07-0.94, respectively). The risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction was decreased significantly in the CAD and CRVD (OR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.53-0.67, and 0.63, 95% CI 0.48-0.84, respectively), but not in the PAD (OR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.15-1.25). Aspirin nearly doubled the risk of major bleeds (OR = 1.87, 95% CI 1.51-2.32 for all clinical conditions). This meta-analysis confirms that aspirin decreases the risk of thrombotic events in patients with confirmed disease of the coronary, cerebrovascular, or peripheral artery beds.

Background There is unsettled controversy about the respective efficacy and safety of 200 and 600 mg mifepristone in combination with two prostaglandins for the termination of pregnancy up to 63 days' gestation. Study Design We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of direct comparisons between the two dose regimens. End points were complete abortion, continuing pregnancy and side effects. Results Four RCTs (3482 patients) were found. Noninferiority of 200 mg mifepristone compared with 600 mg was proven for complete abortion [difference, 0.4%; 95% confidence interval (CI)=−1.4% to 2.3%]. Noninferiority was not proven for continuing pregnancy (difference, 0.4%; 95% CI=−0.3% to 1.0%). Two hundred milligrams may therefore result in 1% more continuing pregnancies than 600 mg when used with the approved prostaglandin regimens. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the findings. There was no difference in adverse events between both doses of mifepristone. Conclusions Although 200 or 600 mg of mifepristone with two prostaglandins probably results in similar rates of complete abortion, the substitution of 200 mg for 600 mg may lead to an increased continuing pregnancy rate.

International audience; Previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) increases operative risk in conventional valve replacement. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been shown to be successful in high-risk patient subgroups. The present study compared outcome and overall survival in patients who underwent TAVI with and without history of CABG. From January 2010 to December 2011, 683 of the 3,761 patients selected for TAVI in 34 French centers (18%) had a history of CABG. Outcomes (mortality and complications) were collected prospectively according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC) criteria. Patients with previous CABG were younger, with higher rates of diabetes and vascular disease and higher logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (29.8 ± 16.4 vs 20.1 ± 13.0, p

International audience; OBJECTIVES: The relationship between anemia, renal insufficiency, and the outcomes of TAVI patients has not been thoroughly studied. We aimed to evaluate the influence of pre- and post-procedural anemia on the incidence of renal insufficiency, especially AKI, and on the outcomes of TAVI. METHODS: Data from the French national TAVI registry were collected in 3,472 patients who underwent TAVI between January 2010 and December 2012. Of these 2,137 were in the no/mild anemia group, 748 were in the moderate anemia group, and 587 were in the severe anemia group before TAVI. Furthermore, we divided the 3,472 patients into three groups according to post-procedural anemia, measured as post-procedural hemoglobin (Hb) drop: \textless2 g/dl (n=1,633, group 1), 2 to \textless4 g/dl (n=1,458, group 2), and \textgreater4 g/dl (n = 381, group 3). Procedure and outcome variables were compared. RESULTS: Increased severity of anemia before TAVI was associated with significantly different rates of 1-year mortality (15%, 19%, and 24%, P\textless0.01), with similar differences in the incidence of AKI (5%, 8%, and 10%, P\textless0.01). Increased severity of Hb drop was associated with significantly different rates of 1-year mortality (16%, 18%, and 23%, P\textless0.01), and with similar differences in the incidence of AKI (6%, 7%, and 10%, P=0.04). Both pre- and post-procedural anemia were predictors of the incidence of AKI (OR 1.82, P\textless0.01; OR 1.82, P\textless0.01, respectively) and 1-year mortality (HR 1.44, P\textless0.01; HR 1.50, P\textless0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Both pre- and post-procedural anemia were significantly associated AKI and 1-year mortality

Aims The aim of this study was to assess the influence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) classification on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Methods and results Data of 2,929 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI in the FRANCE 2 registry were analysed. Patients were divided into five groups: CKD 1+2, 3a, 3b, 4, and 5. Both 30-day and one-year mortality rates were significantly increased and positively correlated with CKD severity in all groups. After adjusting for significant influential confounders in a Cox regression multivariate model, CKD 4 and 5 were associated with increased risk of both 30-day mortality and one-year mortality when compared with CKD 1+2 as the reference. This higher mortality was predominantly driven by renal failure and infection in patients with CKD 4 and 5, respectively. Procedural success rate in CKD 5 was significantly lower than that in other groups. All CKD patients trended towards a higher incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), in parallel with the degree of CKD severity. Conclusions Classification of CKD stages before TAVI allows risk stratification for 30-day and one-year clinical outcomes. CKD 3b, 4 and 5 correlate with poor outcome and are considered a significant risk for TAVI.

The aim of this study was to determine baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with pre-existing atrial fibrillation (AF) and of patients who presented with new-onset AF after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).Little is known regarding the impact of AF after TAVI.The FRANCE-2 registry included all patients undergoing TAVI (N = 3,933) in France in 2010 and 2011. New-onset AF was defined as the occurrence of AF post-procedure in a patient with no documented history of AF.AF was documented before TAVI in 25.8% of patients. New-onset AF was observed in 174 patients after TAVI among patients without a history of pre-existing AF (6.0%). At 1 year, the rates of all-cause death (26.5 vs. 16.6%, respectively; p0.001) and cardiovascular death (11.5 vs. 7.8%, respectively; p0.001) were significantly higher in patients with pre-existing AF compared with those without AF. Rehospitalization for worsening heart failure and New York Heart Association functional class was also higher in patients with pre-existing AF versus those without, resulting in a higher rate of combined efficacy endpoint in this group (p0.001). A history of stroke, surgical (nontransfemoral) approach, cardiological, and hemorrhagic procedure-related events were all independently related to the occurrence of new-onset post-procedural AF. New-onset AF in patients without pre-existing AF was associated with a higher rate of combined safety endpoint at 30 days (p0.001) and a higher rate of both all-cause death and combined efficacy endpoint at 1 year (p = 0.003 and p = 0.02, respectively).Pre-existing and new-onset AF are both associated with higher mortality and morbidity after TAVI.

We thank Drs Iqbal and Serruys for their interesting comments on our study.1 Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is a very good alternative to conventional surgical replacement in patients with aortic stenosis at increased risk for surgery.2,3 As efficient as it is, transcatheter aortic valve replacement has important limitations, including postprocedural aortic regurgitation (AR). Our study was designed to (1) describe the rate of postprocedural AR evaluated at discharge in a large series of consecutive patients treated with balloon-expandable (BE) and self-expandable devices, (2) analyze the predictors of postprocedural ARs in the overall population for each device, and (3) analyze the impact of postprocedural ARs on clinical outcome. The results of our study1 and others2 demonstrate clearly that postprocedural AR≥moderate as evaluated by echocardiography at discharge is frequent (15%) and is an independent predictor of long-term mortality. Our study demonstrates also that the clinical significance of a postprocedural AR≥moderate is …

Preventing coronary in-stent restenosis is a major challenge for physicians and industry. To assess new stent technologies, a comparative paired iliac artery model in rabbits is proposed. One tubular stent was implanted in each external iliac artery in 12 rabbits (i.e., 24 stents). An artery overdilatation level of 20% was strictly observed. Restenosis was examined at 30 days by angiography, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) examination, and histomorphometry. On quantitative angiography, the mean loss of angiographic diameter was 9.8 ± 4.4% in the right as compared to 9.3 ± 55% in the left artery (p = 0.75). On IVUS, the volume of intrastent neointimal proliferation was 26.6 ± 4.9 mm3 in the right and 25.8 ± 3.5 mm3 in the left artery (p = 0.58). In histomorphometry, the neointimal proliferation area was 0.78 ± 17 mm2 in the right and 0.76 ± 0.17 mm2 in the left artery (p = 0.87). Intrastent neointimal proliferation was comparable between the left and right arteries of all rabbits. The model has three main advantages: (1) arterial dilatation and thus arterial wall aggression are controlled, (2) pairing makes each animal its own control subject, and (3) the statistical power for comparative testing is maximized. The model enables the effect of a new drug-delivery device to be assessed. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 70B: 303–310, 2004

The efficacy and safety of lipid-lowering agents in elderly individuals have not been extensively assessed. This population generally takes more drugs concurrently than middle-aged patients, and are therefore at higher risk of drug-drug interactions. This large-scale, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigated the efficacy and safety of extended-release (XL) fluvastatin 80 mg once daily for up to 1 year in elderly patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. A total of 1229 patients (mean age, 75.5 years) were randomized. After 2 months of treatment, fluvastatin XL 80 mg significantly decreased plasma lipid levels from baseline compared with placebo; fluvastatin reduced total cholesterol by 25% compared with a decrease of 2.5% in the placebo group, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was -33% vs. -2.5%, respectively, and triglycerides were -13.3% vs. 2.9%, respectively (p

OBJECTIVE—The DIABHYCAR (type 2 DIABetes, Hypertension, CArdiovascular Events and Ramipril) study allowed investigators to analyze factors leading to the development of congestive heart failure (CHF) in type 2 diabetic patients with abnormal urinary albumin concentration. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Type 2 diabetic subjects of both sexes aged ≥50 years who had a urinary albumin concentration ≥20 mg/l were randomly allocated to 1.25 mg/day ramipril or placebo in addition to their usual treatment and treated for 3–6 years in a double-blind fashion. Major outcomes including hospitalization for CHF were recorded during the follow-up. RESULTS—Of the 4,912 included patients, 187 developed CHF during the study. There was no significant difference in the incidence of CHF between the two treatment groups. Using a multivariate analysis, independent risk factors for the occurrence of CHF were age, history of cardiovascular disease, baseline urinary albumin concentration, baseline HbA1c, and smoking habits. A total of 68 of the 187 patients (36.4%) died during the 12 ± 11-month period after the first hospitalization for CHF, whereas the annual mortality rate of the population who did not develop CHF was 3.2%. CONCLUSIONS—Presence of atherosclerotic disease, baseline urinary albumin concentration, and HbA1c level were indicators for further development of CHF. Occurrence of CHF is a major prognostic turn in a diabetic patient’s life.

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is well-known to be associated with mortality and morbidity after conventional cardiac surgery. In the present sub-analysis of the FRANCE 2 registry, we investigated the impact of AF on VARC-defined outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatether aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Methods: The FRANCE 2 registry included all TAVI performed in France between January 2010 and December 2011. Analyses were performed at 2 different time points: (1) AF vs no AF, before valve implantation, and (2) AF vs no AF, after the procedure, among the survivors at day 2. Comparisons of clinical outcomes at 30 days and 1 year, between patients with and without AF, were adjusted for baseline (all analysis) and procedural (analysis 2) characteristics by multivariate analysis. Results: In total, 3875 patients whose pre-TAVI ECG was reported were included (25.8% with AF) (study population for analysis 1). Procedural success was 94% in the non-AF group and 94.5% in the AF group. Three hundred thirteen patients (8.1%) died during the first 24 hours (non-AF: 7.8%, AF: 9.2%; P=0.13); 3377 were alive at day 2 with an ECG (study population for analysis 2); 827 (24.5%) were in AF, including 164 patients with new onset AF (4.8%). The main findings concerning the clinical outcomes of the study populations are displayed in the table. The higher rate of VARC-defined combined efficacy endpoint observed in patients with AF vs those without, in both analysis, is driven by cardiovascular deaths, worsening congestive heart failure and NYHA functional status class III or IV. Conclusion: AF, before and after TAVI, is associated with a higher rate of one-year mortality and morbidity.

AIMS To assess the relationship between a low preprocedural (

The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence, impact, and predictors of cerebrovascular events (CVEs) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).Several issues remain unresolved post-TAVR, including CVEs.The FRANCE-2 (French Aortic Nation CoreValve and Edwards-2) registry prospectively included all patients who underwent TAVR in France and Monaco from January 2010 to October 2011. A total of 3,191 patients were analyzed. Six-month follow-up data were obtained. Events were adjudicated according to Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-1 definition.Of the cohort, 3.98% experienced a CVE: 55% were major strokes, 14.5% minor strokes, and 30.5% transient ischemic attacks. The mean delay for CVE occurrence was 2 days (interquartile range: 0 to 7 days) with 48.5% of CVEs occurring within 2 days. There was no statistically significant difference in CVE rate with regard to the type of valve (p = 0.899) and the access route (p = 0.128). Patients with a CVE more frequently had new-onset paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (13.6% vs. 7.6%; p = 0.015). During follow-up, the unadjusted mortality rate was higher in patients with a CVE (26% vs. 16.5%; p = 0.002). By multivariate analysis, only advanced age (odds ratio: 1.05; 95% confidence interval: 1.02 to 1.08; p = 0.02) and having 2 valves implanted (odds ratio: 3.13; 95 confidence interval: 1.40 to 7.05; p = 0.006) were associated with a significant risk of CVEs.CVEs occur frequently after TAVR and are associated with an increased mortality rate. No difference exists in the CVE rate when exploring the type of valve or the access route. Advanced age and multiple valves implanted during the same procedure are predictors of CVE.

Background and Purpose— We aimed at comparing the long-term benefit–risk balance of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Methods— Long-term follow-up study of patients included in Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients With Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S), a randomized, controlled trial of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in 527 patients with recently symptomatic severe carotid stenosis, conducted in 30 centers in France. The main end point was a composite of any ipsilateral stroke after randomization or any procedural stroke or death. Results— During a median follow-up of 7.1 years (interquartile range, 5.1–8.8 years; maximum 12.4 years), the primary end point occurred in 30 patients in the stenting group compared with 18 patients in the endarterectomy group. Cumulative probabilities of this outcome were 11.0% (95% confidence interval, 7.9–15.2) versus 6.3% (4.0–9.8) in the endarterectomy group at the 5-year follow-up (hazard ratio, 1.85; 1.00–3.40; P =0.04) and 11.5% (8.2–15.9) versus 7.6% (4.9–11.8; hazard ratio, 1.70; 0.95–3.06; P =0.07) at the 10-year follow-up. No difference was observed between treatment groups in the rates of ipsilateral stroke beyond the procedural period, severe carotid restenosis (≥70%) or occlusion, death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization procedures. Conclusions— The long-term benefit–risk balance of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis favored endarterectomy, a difference driven by a lower risk of procedural stroke after endarterectomy. Both techniques were associated with low and similar long-term risks of recurrent ipsilateral stroke beyond the procedural period. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00190398.

Arterial lumen volume, determined by sequential coronary angiography, could have advantages over more commonly used variables (such as percent stenosis or minimal lumen diameter) as a primary endpoint in clinical trials evaluating post-angioplasty restenosis or atherosclerotic plaque progression. We validated a quantitative coronary angiography analysis (QCA) system aimed at measuring lumen volume from coronary angiography films by a densitometric method. Using images of polyacrylate models filled with different concentrations of contrast medium, accuracy (mean of the differences between known and measured values of a measurement) and precision (standard deviation of the difference) were lower than or equal to 0.09 and 0.21 mm, respectively, for diameters ranging from 1.5 to 16 mm. In terms of volume measurement, accuracy was 30.2 mm3 and precision 5.7 mm3 for a known volume of 620.2 mm3. To assess the short-term variations of lumen volume measurements under conditions resembling those encountered in clinical trials, a special image comparison program of the QCA system was used to measure the same coronary artery segment on two images taken 10 minutes apart in 21 patients. The mean difference between the two measurements was 1.7 ± 12.4 mm3, with a coefficient of variation of 15%. An error of ± 2 frames in the selection of images to be analyzed had little influence on the results. We conclude that the QCA system provides easy-to-achieve standardization of the image acquisition process and sufficient reproducibility for repeated measurement of volume of a coronary artery segment, which can serve as the primary endpoint in clinical trials evaluating atherosclerotic plaque progression or restenosis after angioplasty.

The "obesity paradox" that patients with high body mass index (BMI) have good prognoses remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the impact of BMI on clinical outcomes in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Data from the French national TAVI registry were collected for 3,072 patients who underwent TAVI from January 2010 to October 2011. The patients were categorized into 4 groups according to BMI (kg/m(2)): underweight (18.5 kg/m(2)), normal weight (18.5 to 25 kg/m(2)), overweight (25 to 30 kg/m(2)), and obese (30 kg/m(2)). Thereafter, clinical outcomes were compared among the 4 groups. The BMI distribution was 3.1% (n = 95), 44.1% (n = 1,355), 34.2% (n = 1,050), and 18.6% (n = 572). Although the 4 groups greatly differed in baseline clinical background, they had similar procedural success rates (95.8%, 97.1%, 97.3%, and 95.6%, p = 0.23). Major vascular complication was significantly associated with the underweight patients after adjusting for the other potential confounders (odds ratio 2.33, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 4.46, p = 0.016). The cumulative postoperative survival rates were increasing across the 4 groups at 30 days (83.2%, 88.9%, 91.6%, and 93.0%, p = 0.003) and 1 year (67.9%, 73.6%, 77.4%, and 80.3%, p = 0.006). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, the overweight and obese patients were independently associated with superior cumulative survival rate at 1 year (hazard ratios 0.74 and 0.71, 95% confidence intervals 0.57 to 0.97 and 0.59 to 0.87, p = 0.050 and 0.029, respectively). In conclusion, major morbidity and 1-year mortality were less in overweight and obese patients than those classified as normal weight even in a TAVI cohort.

Background Although transcatheter aortic valve implantation has been developing as an alternative treatment in elderly patients with high surgical risk, age-specific differences in clinical outcome have not been fully validated. Methods Data were analyzed for 2,254 patients at least 80 years old who were enrolled between January 2010 and October 2011 in the French national transcatheter aortic valve implantation registry, FRANCE-2. Procedural and clinical outcomes defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria were compared among subjects in three age groups: 80 to 84 years (n = 867), 85 to 89 years (n = 1,064), and at least 90 years (n = 349; range, 90 to 101 years). Results The self-expandable prosthesis was implanted in 710 patients, and the balloon-expandable prosthesis was implanted in 1,544 patients. No differences were observed in rates of procedural success, Valve Academic Research Consortium–defined complications, and length of hospitalization among groups. Cumulative 30-day mortalities did not change among the three groups (80 to 84 years, 10.3% versus 85 to 89 years, 9.5% versus ≥90 years, 11.2%; p = 0.53). Cumulative 1-year mortalities also showed no statistical differences, although the mortality rate was higher in patients 85 to 89 years old and at least 90 years old compared with those 80 to 84 years old (19.8% versus 26.1% versus 27.7%; p = 0.16). After adjustment for differential baseline characteristics and potential confounders, patient age (85 to 89 years and ≥90 years compared with 80 to 84 years) was not associated with increasing risk of 30-day mortality (hazard ratio, 0.92, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.66 to 1.27, 0.83 to 1.94; p = 0.38, 0.28, respectively) and 1-year mortality (hazard ratio, 1.16, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.90 to 1.49, 0.97 to 1.89; p = 0.25, 0.073, respectively). Conclusions This study revealed acceptable clinical results of transcatheter aortic valve implantation even in very elderly populations.

Background Several observational studies on hypertensive patients have shown a gap between therapeutic targets recommended in guidelines and those achieved in daily practice. The ESCAPE trial aimed to determine whether a multifaceted intervention focused on general practitioners (GPs), could increase significantly the proportion of hypertensive patients at high risk in primary prevention who achieved all their recommended therapeutic targets. Methods A pragmatic, cluster randomized trial involving 257 GPs randomized by region. The GPs in the intervention group had a one-day training session and were given an electronic blood pressure measurement device and a short recommendation leaflet. Along with usual follow-up, they focused one consultation on hypertension and other cardiovascular risk factors every six months for two years. They also received feedback at baseline and at one year on their patients’ clinical and biological parameters. Main outcome measures were change in the proportion of patients achieving all their therapeutic targets and each individual therapeutic target at two years, and quality of life. Results 1,832 high-risk hypertensive patients were included. After two years, the proportion of patients achieving all their therapeutic targets increased significantly in both groups, but significantly more in the intervention group: OR (odds-ratio) 1.89, (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09 to 3.27, P = 0.02). Significantly more patients achieved their blood pressure targets in the intervention group than in the usual care group: OR 2.03 (95% CI 1.44 to 2.88, P P Conclusion An easy-to-perform, multifaceted intervention targeting only GPs increased significantly the proportion of high-risk hypertensive patients in primary prevention achieving their recommended therapeutic targets. Trial registration This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00348855

Abstract The objective of this trial was to assess the effects of 6-month daily treatment with two doses of ramipril on left ventricular mass and the dependence of this on blood pressure changes in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. After a selection phase of 4 to 6 weeks with patients under antihypertensive therapy with 20 mg furosemide daily, 115 patients with either controlled or uncontrolled hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy were randomized in a double-blind manner to receive either placebo (n=40), 1.25 mg (low dose, n=38), or 5 mg (regular dose, n=37) ramipril daily for 6 months. Treatment with furosemide was continued unchanged during this phase. The main outcome measured was left ventricular hypertrophy regression as assessed from central blind reading of echocardiograms recorded at randomization and after 6 months. No significant differences were observed for changes in casual or ambulatory blood pressure between the three groups. Left ventricular mass index was found to be significantly reduced in patients receiving 5 mg ramipril compared with those receiving placebo (−10.8±3.7 versus +4.1±4.0 g/m 2 , P =.008); in patients receiving 1.25 mg ramipril, the difference was close to borderline significance compared with placebo (−7.0±4.3 g/m 2 , P =.06). Similar results were observed for changes in left ventricular mass (−20.3±6.6 and −13.0±7.8 g in the 5- and 1.25-mg ramipril groups, respectively, versus +9.1±7.2 g in the placebo group; P =.004 and .04, respectively). In a multiple regression model testing 10 potential explicative variables, we found that this reduction was correlated with treatment, both 1.25 and 5.0 mg ramipril ( P =.03 and .01, respectively), and with the baseline value of the left ventricular mass index ( P =.005). Changes in ambulatory or casual systolic and diastolic blood pressures were not predictive of changes in left ventricular mass ( P =.15 and .16, respectively). Ramipril at 1.25 and 5 mg daily for 6 months can induce left ventricular hypertrophy regression, independent of changes in blood pressure, in patients under furosemide (20 mg/d) antihypertensive therapy. The implications of this regression for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients should now be assessed.

Existing cardiovascular risk prediction equations perform non-optimally in different populations with diabetes. Thus, there is a continuing need to develop new equations that will reliably estimate cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and offer flexibility for adaptation in various settings. This report presents a contemporary model for predicting cardiovascular risk in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.A 4.5-year follow-up of the Action in Diabetes and Vascular disease: preterax and diamicron-MR controlled evaluation (ADVANCE) cohort was used to estimate coefficients for significant predictors of CVD using Cox models. Similar Cox models were used to fit the 4-year risk of CVD in 7168 participants without previous CVD. The model's applicability was tested on the same sample and another dataset.A total of 473 major cardiovascular events were recorded during follow-up. Age at diagnosis, known duration of diabetes, sex, pulse pressure, treated hypertension, atrial fibrillation, retinopathy, HbA1c, urinary albumin/creatinine ratio and non-HDL cholesterol at baseline were significant predictors of cardiovascular events. The model developed using these predictors displayed an acceptable discrimination (c-statistic: 0.70) and good calibration during internal validation. The external applicability of the model was tested on an independent cohort of individuals with type 2 diabetes, where similar discrimination was demonstrated (c-statistic: 0.69).Major cardiovascular events in contemporary populations with type 2 diabetes can be predicted on the basis of routinely measured clinical and biological variables. The model presented here can be used to quantify risk and guide the intensity of treatment in people with diabetes.

Background Most guidelines recommend a systematic screening of asymptomatic high risk patients with diabetes for silent ischemia, but the clinical benefit of this strategy has not been demonstrated compared with the simple control of cardiovascular risk factors. We sought to determine whether referring asymptomatic diabetic patients for screening of silent ischemia decreases the risk of cardiovascular events compared with usual care. Methods DYNAMIT was a prospective, randomized, open, blinded end-point multicenter trial run between 2000 and 2005, with a 3.5 year mean follow-up in ambulatory care in 45 French hospitals. The study included 631 male and female with diabetes aged 63.9 ± 5.1 years, with no evidence of coronary artery disease and at least 2 additional cardiovascular risk factors, receiving appropriate medical treatment. The patients were randomized centrally to either screening for silent ischemia using a bicycle exercise test or Dipyridamole Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (N = 316), or follow-up without screening (N = 315). The main study end point was time to death from all causes, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or heart failure requiring hospitalization or emergency service intervention. The results of a meta-analysis of DYNAMIT and DIAD, a similar study, are also presented. Results The study was discontinued prematurely because of difficulties in recruitment and a lower-than expected event rate. Follow-up was complete for 98.9% patients regarding mortality and for 97.5% regarding the main study end point. Silent ischemia detection procedure was positive or uncertain in 68 (21.5%) patients of the screening group. There was no significant difference between the screening and the usual care group for the main outcome (hazard ratio = 1.00 95%CI 0.59 to 1.71). The meta-analysis of these and DIAD results gave similar results, with narrower confidence intervals for each endpoint. Conclusions These results suggest that the systematic detection of silent ischemia in high-risk asymptomatic patients with diabetes is unlikely to provide any major benefit on hard outcomes in patients whose cardiovascular risk is controlled by an optimal medical treatment. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00627783

Correction of anemia in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients with chronic kidney disease stages 3-4 may slow the decline of kidney function but may increase cardiovascular risk through higher hematocrit. The NEPHRODIAB2 study was designed to assess efficacy and safety of complete hemoglobin (Hb) normalization in these patients.We randomly assigned 89 T2DM patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; abbreviated 175 Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula) of 25 to 60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) and moderate anemia (Hb, 100-129 g/l) to a target Hb value in subnormal range (110-129g/l, group 1, n=43) or normal range (130-149 g/l, group 2, n=46). The primary end point was eGFR decline after 2 years of follow-up. Secondary end points included iron and erythropoietin dosage, quality of life (Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey scores) and adverse events.Six months after randomization, the mean Hb levels were120 g/l in group 1 and130 g/l in group 2 (P.05 at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months). Blood pressure, 24-h proteinuria and HbA1c did not differ during follow-up (P.05). Two-year declines in eGFR were -8.7±12.2 in group 1 and -5.1±7.8 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) in group 2 (P=.29). Mean weekly use of erythropoietin was 7.8±11.6 μg in group 1 and 30.1±33.6 μg in group 2 (P.0001). There was no significant difference regarding Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey score change or adverse event occurrence.In this trial, normalization of Hb level in T2DM patients with chronic kidney disease was safe but did not significantly slow renal function decline and increased treatment cost due to erythropoietin use.

Introduction L’evaluation de la peur de l’hypoglycemie chez le diabetique est importante, mais peu d’outils sont disponibles en pratique clinique. Le questionnaire valide HFS-II (Hypoglycemia Fear Survey-II) mesure la crainte du risque de survenue d’hypoglycemies en evaluant les consequences de l’hypoglycemie et le comportement du patient en retour, ainsi que le degre d’inquietude liee a l’hypoglycemie. L’objectif de cette analyse est d’evaluer les associations cliniques d’un score eleve (>+ 1DS) sur une HbA1c ≥ 7 % et/ou sur la survenue d’une hypoglycemie severe sur trente jours. Patients et methodes Les donnees de 1927 diabetiques francais (1 008 DT1, 919 DT2 insulino-traites) ayant complete le questionnaire HFS-II dans l’etude observationnelle DIALOG ont ete etudiees. Les facteurs correles ont ete analyses avec un modele de regression multivarie. Resultats Les facteurs correles a une valeur de HbA1c ≥ 7 % ont ete recherches separement pour les patients DT1 et DT2. Pour les DT1, les principaux facteurs associes a une valeur haute de HbA1c des 1 008 patients DT1 etaient un score HFS > + 1DS (odds ratio [OR] 3,5 ; Intervalle de confiance 95 % [IC95] 1,9–6,4) et un score HFS entre − 1 et + 1DS (OR 2,8 ; IC95 1,7–4,7) vs un score HFS faible ( 10 ans (OR 1,8 ; IC95 1,3–2,5). Pour les DT2, le score HFS n’etait plus significatif dans le modele multivarie. Les principaux facteurs correles a la survenue d’une hypoglycemie severe etaient la presence d’antecedents d’hypoglycemie (OR 3,8 ; IC95 1,4–10,6), le diabete de type 1 (OR 1,8 ; IC95 1,3–2,5), le score HFS > + 1DS vs Conclusion La peur des hypoglycemies semble etre tres correlee a la fois aux valeurs hautes de HbA1c chez les DT1 et egalement a la survenue d’hypoglycemie severe chez les patients DT1 et DT2.

Age-related macular degeneration is the primary cause of blindness in developed countries. Current treatments of this degenerative disease mainly include laser, photodynamic therapy with verteporfin and administration of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors. The LUEUR (LUcentis® En Utilisation Reelle) study is composed of a cross-sectional part (LUEUR1), which examined the current management of wet AMD in France, and a follow-up part (LUEUR2), which will assess the development of patients treated for wet AMD over 4 years. Here we describe the results of LUEUR1. Patients with wet AMD were enrolled during a routine medical examination in LUEUR1, a cross-sectional, observational, prospective, multicentre study. Investigators recorded patient demographics, visual acuity, characteristics of wet AMD lesions, date of AMD diagnosis, comorbidities, previous treatments, treatments prescribed at inclusion, and low vision rehabilitation. A total of 72 investigators recruited 1,019 patients with wet AMD, corresponding to 1,405 eyes affected by the disease. The mean age of patients was 78.7 ± 7.3 years. Most were female (62.3%) and non-smokers (66.9%). The mean visual acuity was 49.12 ± 24.18 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters. Most eyes showed occult (52.8%) and subfoveal (84.6%) choroidal neovascularisation. Bilateral wet AMD affected 37.9% of patients. The median time since diagnosis was 12 months. Ranibizumab-based therapy (67.3%) and photodynamic therapy (29.8%) were the most frequent previous treatments. Prior to inclusion, 5.6% of patients had low vision rehabilitation. When a treatment was prescribed on the day of inclusion, it was most often ranibizumab (89.0% of all treatments at inclusion). The results of this study illustrate the impact of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies on the treatment of wet AMD in a real-life context. Specifically, ranibizumab-based therapy appears to have largely replaced laser photocoagulation and verteporfin-based photodynamic therapy.

We examined the influence of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors) on mortality in patients with heart failure of both ischaemic or non-ischaemic origin. Eleven, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of ACE inhibitors involving 1266 patients were selected. The follow-up period varied from 3 to 6 months. Four different ACE inhibitors were used in the 11 clinical trials. A total of 679 patients presented with an ischaemic heart failure and 587 with a non-ischaemic heart failure. Meta-analysis, performed for both subgroups, showed that mortality was significantly decreased in the ischaemic subgroup only (ischaemic group: odds ratio 0.45; 95% confidence interval 0.28 to 0.71; non-ischaemic subgroup: odds ratio 0.7; 95% confidence interval 0.4 to 1.5). Although the two odds ratio are not significantly different, further randomized, placebo-controlled trials with ACE inhibitors are required in order to determine more precisely the benefit/risk ratio in patients with non-ischaemic heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a risk factor for the two leading causes of death in renal transplant recipients: cardiovascular disease (CVD) and graft failure. Despite this, the optimum medication for post-transplant hypertension is unclear. METHODS: The Study on Evaluation of Candesartan Cilexetil after Renal Transplantation (SECRET) was an international multicentre, double-blind, randomized investigation of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) candesartan cilexetil versus placebo in renal allograft recipients originally designed to study 700 patients for 3 years. The candesartan dose was escalated from 4 to 16 mg daily, followed by addition of co-medication, if needed, with the aim of achieving a diastolic blood pressure (BP)

Multivariate analysis of 1H-NMR spectra of blood sera was reported previously to predict angiographically defined advanced coronary artery disease (CAD) with90% accuracy and specificity. The analysis depended mainly on the major lipid regions of the spectra, but many variables, including gender and drug treatment, affect lipid composition and are potential confounders. We have determined the predictive power of the same methodology for angiographically defined CAD using plasma samples from groups of male patients, classified by statin treatment, who had normal coronary arteries (NCAs) or CAD. Predictions for NCA and CAD groups were only 80.3% correct for patients not treated with statins and 61.3% for treated patients, compared with random correct predictions of 50%. A confidence limit of99% was achieved for 36.2% of predictions for untreated groups and 6.2% for treated groups. Detection of CAD by 1H-NMR with99% confidence was therefore very weak compared with angiography.

International audience; BACKGROUND: Carotid stenting is less invasive than endarterectomy, but it is unclear whether it is as safe in patients with symptomatic carotid-artery stenosis. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial to compare stenting with endarterectomy in patients with a symptomatic carotid stenosis of at least 60%. The primary end point was the incidence of any stroke or death within 30 days after treatment. RESULTS: The trial was stopped prematurely after the inclusion of 527 patients for reasons of both safety and futility. The 30-day incidence of any stroke or death was 3.9% after endarterectomy (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0 to 7.2) and 9.6% after stenting (95% CI, 6.4 to 14.0); the relative risk of any stroke or death after stenting as compared with endarterectomy was 2.5 (95% CI, 1.2 to 5.1). The 30-day incidence of disabling stroke or death was 1.5% after endarterectomy (95% CI, 0.5 to 4.2) and 3.4% after stenting (95% CI, 1.7 to 6.7); the relative risk was 2.2 (95% CI, 0.7 to 7.2). At 6 months, the incidence of any stroke or death was 6.1% after endarterectomy and 11.7% after stenting (P=0.02). There were more major local complications after stenting and more systemic complications (mainly pulmonary) after endarterectomy, but the differences were not significant. Cranial-nerve injury was more common after endarterectomy than after stenting. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis of 60% or more, the rates of death and stroke at 1 and 6 months were lower with endarterectomy than with stenting. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00190398 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).