Search

BACKGROUND: Stopping antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV-1 infection can reduce costs and side-effects, but carries the risk of increased immune suppression and emergence of resistance. METHODS: 430 patients with CD4-positive T-lymphocyte (CD4) counts greater than 350 cells per muL, and viral load less than 50 copies per mL were randomised to continued therapy (n=146) or scheduled treatment interruptions (n=284). Median time on randomised treatment was 21.9 months (range 16.4-25.3). Primary endpoints were proportion of patients with viral load less than 50 copies per mL at the end of the trial, and amount of drugs used. Analysis was intention-to-treat. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier NCT00113126. FINDINGS: Drug savings in the scheduled treatment interruption group, compared with continuous treatment, amounted to 61.5%. 257 of 284 (90.5%) patients in the scheduled treatment interruption group reached a viral load less than 50 copies per mL, compared with 134 of 146 (91.8%) in the continued treatment group (difference 1.3%, 95% CI-4.3 to 6.9, p=0.90). No AIDS-defining events occurred. Diarrhoea and neuropathy were more frequent with continuous treatment; candidiasis was more frequent with scheduled treatment interruption. Ten patients (2.3%) had resistance mutations, with no significant differences between groups. INTERPRETATION: Drug savings with scheduled treatment interruption were substantial, and no evidence of increased treatment resistance emerged. Treatment-related adverse events were more frequent with continuous treatment, but low CD4 counts and minor manifestations of HIV infection were more frequent with scheduled treatment interruption.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the effect of granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) on viral load and CD4 cell count during interruption of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). METHODS: Patients on effective HAART (CD4 cell count > 400 x 10(6)/l; viral load < 50 HIV RNA copies/ml) were randomized to one of two groups: 12 weeks' treatment interruption plus, during the first 4 weeks, 300 microg GM-CSF (Leucomax-Novartis) by subcutaneous injection three times weekly (GM-CSF group); 12 weeks' scheduled treatment interruption (STI-only group). Viral load, CD4 cell count, clinical events and side effects of treatment were monitored. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients, 15 in the GM-CSF group and 18 in the STI-only group, were evaluated according to the intention-to-treat principle. The two groups were well matched with regard to pre-HAART viral loads and CD4 cell counts. During STI, viraemia was approximately two to three times lower in the group receiving GM-CSF (max 4.97 versus 5.45 in STI-only group; P = 0.03). Fifteen out of 17 patients in the STI-only group showed a decrease in their CD4 cell count between weeks 0 and 4 (median decrease 231 x 10(6) cells/l; P < 0.001); there was no such tendency in the GM-CSF group (P = non-significant when comparing CD4 cell counts at weeks 0 and 4). The median CD4 cell AUC (area under the curve) from week 0 to week 12 was higher in the GM-CSF group (9166 cells.week) than in patients without GM-CSF (7257), P = 0.02. GM-CSF produced local reactions in 88% of patients, and generalized symptoms such as fever, back pain or headache in 82% of patients. Seventy-six percent of patients completed the planned course of 12 injections. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of GM-CSF blunted the viral rebound following interruption of HAART, and largely prevented a decrease of CD4 cell counts during a 12-weeks-treatment interruption. A better understanding of the underlying mechanism(s) may help to identify synergistic treatment targets and improved administration protocols to enhance control of chronic HIV infection.

Objectives: To measure the reliability of data mining for indicators related to patient treatment at hospital discharge. Methods: Design: Retrospective cohort study. Population: Patients discharged alive after an admission for heart failure in a general internal medicine department from 2009 to 2010. Data: Key treatments at patient's discharge extracted from the clinical information system compared with data extracted manually from the medical records. Endpoint: Accuracy of data mining for treatment prescription. Analysis: Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPVs and NPVs) of data mining for angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and betablockers prescription discharge. The gold standard was manual data extraction. We then investigated causes of discrepancies between the two methods. Results: A total of 724 patients were included. At discharge, 85.2% received an ACE inhibitor and 72.4% a beta-blocker. For ACE inhibitors, data mining yielded a sensitivity of 90%, a specificity of 100%, a PPV of 100% and an NPV of 64%. Corresponding values for beta-blockers were 95%, 100%, 100% and 88%, respectively. Main causes for discrepancy were: omission of some molecules in the electronic query used; non-standard writing of a prescription in the clinical information system; formats incorrectly interpreted by the query. Conclusion: Immediate reliance on data mining for drug prescription is currently unwarranted because this complex process is still prone to errors. Results should be manually checked before they can be used as quality indicators.

In HIV patients who discontinue highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), the degree of HIV RNA suppression at the time of treatment interruption may predict success of re-treatment after the interruption (STI). A case-control substudy of the Staccato trial in Thailand included CD4-guided STI subjects with HIV RNA > 50 copies /ml (virological failure cases, n=11) and HIV RNA < 50 copies/ml (controls, n=22) after 12-24 weeks of HAART re-treatment following a median of 2 STI cycles. Controls were matched for age, gender and pre-ART CD4 count. HIV RNA with 5 copies/ml detection limit was determined on pre-virological failure samples. HIV RNA increased in cases compared to controls with each successive STI cycle (p-trend across time-points 0.004). The last HIV RNA below 50 copies/ml was significantly higher among cases compared to controls (p=.004). Measuring HIV RNA below 50 copies/ml may be useful in predicting virological failure to STI.

OBJECTIVES: Thai patients have a lower average body weight than patients from western Europe or the USA. Tenofovir is largely prescribed at the standard dosage of 300 mg once daily: therefore, the per kilogram dose is higher in Thailand than in the USA. We asked the question whether this higher per kilogram dose was associated with more nephrotoxicity. METHODS: Thai patients from the Staccato trial were treated with tenofovir/lamivudine combined with ritonavir-boosted saquinavir. Creatinine values were measured before the start of tenofovir and then every 12 weeks. Renal function was assessed using the Cockcroft-Gault formula and the MDRD formula. To compare CL(CR) before and after tenofovir, the t-paired or Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used. One-way analysis of variance and Spearman's correlation coefficient were used to study CL(CR) longitudinally. RESULTS: CL(CR) remained stable after a median of 21 weeks on tenofovir (difference of +1.06 mL/min; 95% CI -2.7-4.8, P=0.58), even among patients with underlying diseases. The mean CL(CR) remained stable across time (P=0.17). CONCLUSIONS: We did not find renal dysfunction on tenofovir among Thai patients included in the Staccato trial. Tenofovir could be safely prescribed at a standard dosage of 300 mg once daily in the Thai population.

In 115 patients whose scheduled treatment interruptions (STI) lasted 24 weeks, the CD4 cell count declined by a median of 30 cells/ml/week during the first 4 weeks, compared with 3 cells/ml/week during the next 20 weeks. In multivariate regression, a pronounced early fall in CD4 cells correlated with a higher CD4 cell count at the start of STI, with more gain in CD4 cells during antiretroviral treatment preceding STI, and with a higher viral load at week 4.

BACKGROUND: According to the "autovaccination hypothesis," reexposure to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) during treatment interruptions may stimulate the HIV-specific immune response and lead to low viremia after withdrawal of highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART). Many patients who started HAART earlier in their disease course than is currently recommended would like to discontinue, but it is unknown whether it is safe to do so. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether repeated treatment interruptions of HAART (1) stimulated the cytotoxic HIV-specific immune response and whether such stimulation correlated with low viremia off treatment, and (2) were safe with respect to clinical complications, development of viral resistance, and decline in CD4 cell counts. DESIGN: Interventional study with before-after comparison. SETTING: Outpatient clinics of university hospitals in Switzerland and Spain. PATIENTS: A total of 133 patients receiving HAART, with a median CD4 cell count of 740/ microL, and whose viral load had been undetectable for a median of 21 months. INTERVENTIONS: HAART was interrupted for 2 weeks, restarted, and continued for 8 weeks. After 4 such cycles, treatment was indefinitely suspended 40 weeks after study entry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: HIV-specific cytotoxic T-cell responses were evaluated by interferon gamma enzyme-linked immunospot analysis. The proportion of "responders" (viral load