Search

Background Patients with lymphoid malignancies are at risk for poor coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related outcomes and have reduced vaccine-induced immune responses. Currently, a 3-dose primary regimen of mRNA vaccines is recommended in the United States for immunocompromised hosts. Methods A prospective cohort study of healthy adults (n = 27) and patients with lymphoid malignancies (n = 94) was conducted, with longitudinal follow-up through completion of a 2- or 3-dose primary mRNA COVID vaccine series, respectively. Humoral responses were assessed in all participants, and cellular immunity was assessed in a subset of participants. Results The rate of seroconversion (68.1% vs 100%) and the magnitude of peak anti-S immunoglobulin G (IgG) titer (median anti-S IgG = 32.4, IQR = 0.48–75.0 vs median anti-S IgG = 72.6, IQR 51.1–100.1; P = .0202) were both significantly lower in patients with lymphoid malignancies compared to the healthy cohort. However, peak titers of patients with lymphoid malignancies who responded to vaccination were similar to healthy cohort titers (median anti-S IgG = 64.3; IQR, 23.7–161.5; P = .7424). The third dose seroconverted 7 of 41 (17.1%) patients who were seronegative after the first 2 doses. Although most patients with lymphoid malignancies produced vaccine-induced T-cell responses in the subset studied, B-cell frequencies were low with minimal memory cell formation. Conclusions A 3-dose primary mRNA series enhanced anti-S IgG responses to titers equivalent to healthy adults in patients with lymphoid malignancies who were seropositive after the first 2 doses and seroconverted 17.1% who were seronegative after the first 2 doses. T-cell responses were present, raising the possibility that the vaccines may confer some cell-based protection even if not measurable by anti-S IgG.

Key Points Patients with B-NHL treated with an anti-CD20 antibody are unlikely to achieve humoral response to BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.Longer time since last exposure to anti-CD20 antibodies predicts a higher response rate and elevated antibody titer., Visual Abstract, Patients diagnosed with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL), particularly if recently treated with anti-CD20 antibodies, are at risk of severe COVID-19 disease. Because studies evaluating humoral response to COVID-19 vaccine in these patients are lacking, recommendations regarding vaccination strategy remain unclear. The humoral immune response to BNT162b2 messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine was evaluated in patients with B-NHL who received 2 vaccine doses 21 days apart and compared with the response in healthy controls. Antibody titer, measured by the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2S assay, was evaluated 2 to 3 weeks after the second vaccine dose. Patients with B-NHL (n = 149), aggressive B-NHL (a-B-NHL; 47%), or indolent B-NHL (i-B-NHL; 53%) were evaluated. Twenty-eight (19%) were treatment naïve, 37% were actively treated with a rituximab/obinutuzumab (R/Obi)–based induction regimen or R/Obi maintenance, and 44% had last been treated with R/Obi >6 months before vaccination. A seropositive response was achieved in 89%, 7.3%, and 66.7%, respectively, with response rates of 49% in patients with B-NHL vs 98.5% in 65 healthy controls (P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that longer time since exposure to R/Obi and absolute lymphocyte count ≥0.9 × 103/μL predicted a positive serological response. Median time to achieve positive serology among anti-CD20 antibody-treated patients was longer in i-B-NHL vs a-B-NHL. The humoral response to BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine is impaired in patients with B-NHL who are undergoing R/Obi treatment. Longer time since exposure to R/Obi is associated with improved response rates to the COVID-19 vaccine. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04746092.

Background Patients with lymphoid malignancies are at high risk of severe COVID-19 disease and were not included in the phase 3 mRNA vaccine trials. Many patients with lymphoid malignancies receive immunosuppressive therapies, including B-cell depleting agents, that may negatively impact humoral response to vaccination. Methods We recruited patients with lymphoid malignancies and healthy participants who planned to receive two doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273). Blood was drawn at baseline, prior to second dose of vaccine, and 28 days after last vaccination. Disease characteristics and therapies were extracted from patients’ electronic medical record. An ultrasensitive, single molecule array (Simoa) assay detected anti-Spike (S), anti-S1, anti-receptor binding domain (RBD), and anti-Nucleocapsid (N) IgG from plasma at each timepoint. Results 23 healthy participants and 37 patients with lymphoid malignancies were enrolled (Table 1). Low titers of anti-N (Fig 1A) demonstrate no prior exposure or acquisition of COVID-19 before vaccination or during the study. 37.8% of the lymphoid malignancy cohort responded to the vaccine, using an internally validated AEB cutoff of 1.07. A significantly higher magnitude of anti-S (p< 0.0001), anti-S1 (p< 0.0001) and anti-RBD (p< 0.0001) are present in the healthy as compared to lymphoid malignancy cohort at the second dose and day 28 post-series (Fig 1B, Fig 1C and Fig 1D). Anti-S IgG titers were compared between the healthy cohort, treatment naïve, and treatment experienced groups (Fig 2). The treatment naïve cohort had high titers by series completion which were not significantly different from the healthy cohort (p=0.2259), although the treatment experienced group had significantly decreased titers (p< 0.0001). Of the 20 patients who had received CD20 therapy, there was no clear correlation of anti-S IgG response with time from CD20 therapy, although most patients who received CD20 therapies within 12 months from the vaccine had no response (Figure 3). Table 1. Demographics Figure 1. Anti-N, Anti-S, Anti-S1, Anti-RBD and Anti-N Ig G for healthy v. lymphoid malignancy cohort The dotted line at 1.07 marks in an internally validated threshold to mark anti-S IgG response. The black bars denote median with 95% CI. Figure 2: Anti-S IgG for healthy v. treatment naïve v. treatment experienced The dotted line at 1.07 marks in an internally validated threshold to mark antibody response. The black bars denote median with 95% CI. Conclusion The vaccine-induced immune response was poor among treatment-experienced patients with lymphoid malignancies, especially among those who received CD20 therapies within 12 months. Figure 3. Months from CD20 therapy v. anti-S IgG titers The dotted line at 1.07 marks in an internally validated threshold to mark antibody response. Disclosures Jennifer Crombie, MD, AbbVie (Grant/Research Support)Bauer (Grant/Research Support)Karyopharm (Consultant)MorphoSys (Consultant) Philippe Armand, MD PhD, ADCT, Celgene, Morphosys, Daiichi, Miltenyi, Tessa, C4, Genmab, Enterome, Regeneron, Genentech, Epizyme, Astra Zeneca (Consultant, Sorry to put them all in, hope you can deconvolute for me)Affimed, Adaptive, BMS, Merck, Kite, IGM, Genentech (Research Grant or Support, Institutional research funding) David Walt, PhD, Quanterix Corporation (Board Member, Shareholder) Nicolas C. Issa, MD, AiCuris (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Astellas (Scientific Research Study Investigator)GSK (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Merck (Scientific Research Study Investigator)

Fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) is highly effective initial therapy for younger patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL); however, most eventually relapse. Duvelisib is a delta/gamma PI3K inhibitor approved for relapsed/refractory CLL. We conducted an investigator-initiated, phase 1b/2 study of duvelisib + FCR (DFCR) as initial treatment for CLL patients aged ≤65. A standard 3 + 3 design included two dose levels of duvelisib (25 mg qd and 25 mg bid). Duvelisib was given for 1 week, then with standard FCR added for up to six 28-day cycles, then up to 2 years of duvelisib maintenance. Thirty-two patients were enrolled. The phase 2 dose of duvelisib was identified as 25 mg bid. Hematologic toxicity was common, and all-grade non-hematologic toxicities included transaminitis (28%), febrile neutropenia (22%), pneumonia (19%), and colitis (6%). The best overall response rate by ITT was 88% (56% CR/CRi and 32% PR). The best rate of bone marrow undetectable minimal residual disease (BM-uMRD) by ITT was 66%. The rate of CR with BM-uMRD at end of combination treatment (primary endpoint) was 25%. Three-year PFS and OS are 73 and 93%, respectively. DFCR is active as initial therapy of younger CLL patients. Immune-mediated and infectious toxicities occurred and required active management.

We hypothesized that ofatumumab with sequential methylprednisolone - alemtuzumab would be an effective and tolerable regimen for patients with high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with TP53 dysfunction. Thirty CLL patients with TP53 dysfunction (15 treatment naive (TN), 15 relapsed/refractory (R/R)) were enrolled in this phase II study. Therapy included ofatumumab with methylprednisolone for 2-4 monthly cycles, then ofatumumab with alemtuzumab for 4-24 weeks, then allogeneic transplantation or maintenance. The rate of overall response, complete response, marrow minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, 3-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 80, 13, 80, 53, and 66%, respectively, in TN patients and 68, 0, 54, 25, and 53%, respectively, in R/R patients. Notable grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia and infection in 43 and 40% of patients, respectively. At median follow-up of 45 months, 13 patients died, and 10 patients are alive posttransplant. Overall, we observed high rates of MRD-negativity and acceptable tolerability in high-risk CLL.