Search

Abstract Purpose The aim of this study was to identify factors that predict favorable functional outcomes in elderly patients with large-vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke (LVO-AIS) who underwent mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study using the prospectively maintained Bigdata Observatory for Stroke of China (BOSC) to identify eligible patients who underwent MT for LVO-AIS at four comprehensive stroke centers between August 2019 and February 2022. Inclusion criteria included patients aged 80 years or older with a baseline modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0–2, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) > 6, baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) > 6 who received treatment within 24 h from symptom onset. Pertinent demographic, clinical, and procedural variables were collected. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of favorable long-term functional outcomes, defined as mRS 0–2 at 90 days. Results A total of 63 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 83 years. Patients with previous diagnosis of atrial fibrillation were more likely to have a favorable functional outcome (OR 2.09, 95% CI 2.09–407.33, p = 0.012), while a higher baseline NIHSS was associated with a less favorable functional outcome (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.46–0.89, p = 0.007). In addition, there was an observed trend suggesting an association between higher baseline ASPECTS and favorable functional outcomes. This association did not reach statistical significance (OR 2.49, 95% CI 0.94–6.54, p = 0.065). Conclusion In this study, we identified factors that predicted a favorable functional outcome in elderly LVO-AIS patients undergoing MT. A higher baseline NIHSS decreased the odds of mRS 0–2 at 90 days, whereas a history of atrial fibrillation increased the odds of a favorable functional outcome. These results emphasize the complex relationship between clinical factors and functional recovery in this vulnerable population.

Background Recent trials confirmed the efficacy and safety of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with low Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS); however, evidence in tandem lesions is limited. This study evaluates endovascular thrombectomy safety and efficacy in patients with acute large‐vessel occlusion with tandem lesions, stratified by baseline ASPECTS. Methods and Results We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from 16 centers. Inclusion criteria included the following: age ≥18 years, anterior circulation tandem lesions, endovascular thrombectomy

Background Flow diversion has revolutionized the management of wide‐necked intracranial aneurysms (IAs). We aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of the new generation 64‐wire Surpass Evolve for the treatment of unruptured small/medium‐sized IAs. Methods and Results This is a subanalysis from the SEASE (Safety and Effectiveness Assessment of the Surpass Evolve) registry, an observational cohort study including 15 academic institutions in North America and Europe between July 2020 and October 2022. Patients with wide‐necked saccular IAs, measuring

Background The presence of an incorporated branch as well as its anatomical relationship to the intracranial aneurysms (IAs) and the parent artery may affect the occlusion outcome following flow diversion. This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the cobalt‐chromium Surpass Evolve (Stryker), a 64‐wire flow diversion device for the treatment of IAs with incorporated branches. Methods This subanalysis uses data from the SEASE (Safety and Effectiveness Assessment of Surpass Evolve) registry to retrieve data related to IAs with incorporated branches. Those IAs were classified by a core lab into 4 categories based on their anatomical relationship to the parent artery and branch: (A) sidewall anatomic, (B) sidewall hemodynamic, (C) neck branch, and (D) dome branch. We compared the outcomes based on their incorporated branch's relation to the dome (A–C versus D). Results This study included 67 patients and IAs. Most IAs were in the posterior communicating artery (46.3%), with a median size of 4.35 mm. Age, sex, comorbidities, baseline functional‐status, and IA features were similar between the 2 groups. Among those, 53 (79.1%) had branches emerging from the dome, and 14 (20.9%) had branches originating from other locations (A = 7, B = 2, and C = 5). At a median imaging follow‐up of 10.5 months, complete occlusion was lower in IAs with a branch from the sac compared with those with the neck (60.8% versus 92.9%; P = 0.026), with an overall occlusion of 67.7%. Thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications, as well as retreatment, were reported in 1.6% and 3.1% of cases, respectively, with no significant differences between groups. Conclusion Our analysis underscores the influence of branch origin on occlusion rates, with the neck‐originating branch demonstrating higher occlusion rates. These insights emphasize the role of anatomical considerations in treatment strategies, follow‐up timelines, and designing future clinical trials. Further studies are warranted to explore these variations across different flow diversion technologies.

Background Flow diversion (FD) has emerged as an effective treatment option for intracranial aneurysms. However, there is limited evidence regarding its safety and efficacy specifically for distal and small‐artery aneurysms of the posterior circulation. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of FD for aneurysms arising from the posterior inferior cerebellar artery, anterior inferior cerebellar artery, superior cerebellar artery, and the P2 and P3 segments of the posterior cerebral artery. Methods This is a subanalysis of the Post‐FD (Posterior Circulation Aneurysms Treated With Flow Diversion) registry, highlighting distal aneurysms in the posterior inferior cerebellar artery, anterior inferior cerebellar artery, superior cerebellar artery, and the P2 and P3 segments of the posterior cerebral artery treated with FD. Aneurysm characteristics and patient outcomes were described for the total series, and a more focused analysis comparing fusiform/dissecting versus saccular aneurysms was performed. The primary treatment outcome was complete aneurysm occlusion (Raymond–Roy class 1). Primary safety outcome was major ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke following FD. Secondary outcomes included functional outcome, aneurysm retreatment, and in‐stent stenosis. Results Overall, 36 patients with 36 aneurysms were treated with FD, with a median age of 60.0 years (interquartile range [IQR], 52.8—65.3 years). Of those, 13 were fusiform/dissecting, while 23 were saccular aneurysms. Complete occlusion was achieved in 78.1% for all aneurysms at a median follow‐up of 14.0 months (IQR, 9.3–48.6 months). There was a nonsignificant trend in rates of complete occlusion between fusiform/dissecting (91.7%) and saccular aneurysms (70%; P = 0.151). Major stroke was reported in 2 cases (5.6%) and in‐stent stenosis in 4 (11.1%), and retreatment was required for 4 aneurysms (11.4%) There was no difference in rates of major stroke, in‐stent stenosis, or retreatment between fusiform/dissecting and saccular aneurysms. Conclusion This study suggests the safety and feasibility of FD for distal aneurysms of the posterior circulation, particularly fusiform/dissecting aneurysms. Further larger‐scale studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Background With the expanding eligibility for endovascular therapy (EVT) of patients presenting in the late window (6–24 hours after last known well), we aimed to derive a score to predict favorable outcomes associated with EVT versus best medical management. Methods and Results A multinational observational cohort of patients from the CLEAR (Computed Tomography for Late Endovascular Reperfusion) study with proximal intracranial occlusion (2014–2022) was queried (n=58 sites). Logistic regression analyses were used to derive a 9‐point score for predicting good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0–2 or return to premorbid modified Rankin Scale score) at 90 days, with sensitivity analyses for prespecified subgroups conducted using bootstrapped random forest regressions. Secondary outcomes included 90‐day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0–2), poor outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 5–6), and 90‐day survival. The score was externally validated with a single‐center cohort (2014–2023). Of the 3231 included patients (n=2499 EVT), a 9‐point score included age, early computed tomography ischemic changes, and stroke severity, with higher points indicating a higher probability of a good functional outcome. The areas under the curve for the primary outcome among EVT and best medical management subgroups were 0.72 (95% CI, 0.70–0.74) and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84–0.90), respectively, with similar performance in the external validation cohort (area under the curve, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.66–0.76]). There was a significant interaction between the score and EVT for good functional outcome, functional independence, and poor outcome (all Pinteraction

Background The available evidence supporting the use of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke patients with large core has increased with the recent release of the Thrombectomy for Emergent Salvage of Large Anterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke (TESLA), Efficacy and Safety of Thrombectomy In Stroke with Extended Lesion and Extended Time Window (TENSION), and Large Stroke Therapy Evaluation (LASTE) trials, providing critical information on additional subgroups not included in initial trials. We aimed to study the efficacy and safety of EVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke with large core and stratify by several subgroups including core infarct at presentation, using a comprehensive meta‐analysis of aggregate data. Methods We executed a systematic search to identify randomized controlled trials that compared EVT to medical management (MM) for the treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke with large core, defined as Alberta Stroke Program Early CT [Computed Tomography] Score ≤5 on noncontrast CT and/or estimated ischemic core ≥50 mL on CT‐perfusion/MR diffusion. The primary outcome was the shift analysis in the 90‐day modified Rankin scale (mRS) score. Secondary outcomes included functional independence (mRS score 0–2), independent ambulation (mRS score 0–3), 90‐day mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Pooled odds ratios were calculated for shift mRS score through the random‐effects meta‐analyses, and risk ratios (RRs) were used for the other outcomes, comparing EVT with MM alone. Results Out of 3402 titles and abstracts screened, 6 randomized controlled trials with 1886 patients were included. The EVT group had a higher shift toward a lower mRS than MM alone (odds ratio [OR], 1.49 [95% CI, 1.24–1.79]). Furthermore, the use of EVT was associated with higher rates of functional independence (19.5% versus 7.5%, RR, 2.49 [95% CI, 1.92–3.24]), independent ambulation (36.5% versus 19.9%, RR, 1.91 [95% CI, 1.51–2.43]), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (5.5% versus 3.2%, RR, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.01–2.95]) compared with MM. There was no difference between the 2 groups regarding mortality (31.5% versus 36.8%, RR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.72–1.02]). Importantly, EVT was consistently associated with a shift toward a lower mRS score in both Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score 3–5 (OR, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.10–2.32]) and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score 0–2 (OR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.17–1.80]) when compared with MM alone. Conclusion Our results confirm the efficacy of EVT for acute ischemic stroke with large core and suggest a consistent benefit across all Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score categories. These results represent an important shift in the current large vessel occlusion selection paradigm that currently considers core as an effect modifier for EVT selection.

Background Rapid expansion of mechanical thrombectomy and swift manufacturing development has translated into significant evolution of large‐bore catheter technology. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association among diverse structural components of large‐bore aspiration catheters on procedural performance. Methods Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained mechanical thrombectomy consortium (SVIN [Society of Vascular Interventional Neurology] Registry) treated with stand‐alone contact aspiration for the first pass in the middle cerebral artery M1 or intracranial internal carotid artery occlusions from 2012 to 2021. Catheters were stratified on the basis of construction materials, tip technology, catheter sizing, and catheter lining. Factors associated with first‐pass effect (first‐pass eTICI 2c–3 reperfusion) as well as speed of clot engagement were analyzed. Results We identified 983 patients with proximal occlusion and aspiration as the first‐pass technique. First‐pass effect was observed in 34% and associated with age (odds ratio [OR], 1.02 [95% CI, 1.01–1.03]), cardioembolic stroke pathogenesis (OR, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.77–2.41]), middle cerebral artery M1 (OR, 2.74 [95% CI, 1.09–1.87]), nongeneral anesthesia (OR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.39–0.767]), as well as with 0.070‐inch (OR, 2.04 95% CI, 1.01–3.78]), and 0.088‐inch (OR, 3.90 [95% CI, 1.58–9.61]) distal catheter inner diameter in the adjusted analysis. Mean time from arterial access to clot contact was 17 minutes, with faster times observed in younger patients (OR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.98–0.996]) as well as with the use of aspiration catheters with shorter length of distal outer hydrophilic coating (18–30 cm) on multivariable regression (OR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.11–0.82]). Conclusion Larger aspiration catheter distal inner diameter was associated with higher rates of first‐pass effect. Aspiration catheter construction components were found to influence times from arterial access to clot contact.

Background The optimal endovascular approach for acutely ruptured wide‐neck intracranial aneurysms remains uncertain, and the use of stent‐assisted coiling or flow diversion is controversial due to antiplatelet therapy requirements and potential risks. Various techniques have been developed to address these challenges, including balloon‐assisted coiling (BAC) and intrasaccular flow‐disruption. The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) is an intrasaccular device that has shown a favorable efficacy and safety profile for ruptured aneurysms with minimal rebleeding rates. We aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between WEB and BAC in a cohort of patients with ruptured wide‐necked intracranial aneurysms. Methods In this international multicenter cohort study, we included consecutive patients treated for ruptured wide‐neck intracranial aneurysms with either WEB or BAC at 4 neurovascular centers. The primary effectiveness outcome was complete aneurysm occlusion at the final imaging follow‐up using the Raymond–Roy scale. Secondary outcomes included a composite of periprocedural hemorrhagic/ischemia‐related complications and favorable functional outcome. Results The study included 104 patients treated with WEB and 107 patients treated with BAC. Of the patients, 60.5% in the WEB group and 53% in the BAC group achieved complete occlusion, with no significant difference between the 2 groups after adjusting for covariates (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.02; 95% CI 0.46–2.25; P = 0.964). The odds of favorable functional outcome did not significantly differ between the WEB (74.8%) and BAC groups (77.4%, adjusted OR = 1.45; 95% CI 0.65–3.24; P = 0.368). Procedure‐related complications were similar in both groups (WEB: 9.6%, BAC: 10.3%, P = 0.872), with no significant difference observed in the rates of ischemic events (WEB: 6.7% versus BAC: 2.8%; P = 0.180) and hemorrhagic events (WEB: 3.8% versus BAC: 7.5%; P = 0.255) between the 2 groups. Conclusion In conclusion, both WEB and BAC techniques showed similar effectiveness and safety outcomes in treating ruptured wide‐neck intracranial aneurysms. Further prospective comparative studies are needed to better guide treatment decisions for this patient population.

Background and Purpose Effect of endovascular therapy (EVT) in acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) patients with tandem lesions (TLs) within 6–24 hours after last known well (LKW) remains unclear. We evaluated the clinical and safety outcomes among TL-LVO patients treated within 6–24 hours. Methods This multicenter cohort was divided into two groups, based on LKW to puncture time: early window (

Background Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has emerged as a viable alternative to carotid endarterectomy for managing carotid artery stenosis in high‐risk patients. Although transfemoral arterial access remains the preferred method, it is associated with inherent limitations and potential complications. Consequently, exploring transradial artery access as a potential option becomes crucial in optimizing patient outcomes and procedural success rates. There are limited data comparing the outcomes of the transradial with the transfemoral approach for CAS. This study aimed to systematically review and meta‐analyze the outcomes and complication rates between transradial and transfemoral access for CAS. Methods A systematic electronic search was conducted in 4 databases. Studies with randomized or nonrandomized designs, involving CAS by the transradial or transfemoral approach, were included. Outcomes of interest were stroke, transient ischemic attack, death, myocardial infarction, and access site complications. A meta‐analysis was performed, analyzing pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs to assess the effect size. Results Six studies with a total of 6917 patients were included, of whom 602 (8.7%) underwent the transradial approach and 6315 (91.3%) the transfemoral approach. The meta‐analysis showed no significant difference in stroke occurrence between the transradial and transfemoral groups (transradial:1.7% versus transfemoral:1.9%; OR = 0.98 [95% CI, 0.49–1.96]; I2 = 0%). Similarly, no significant difference was found in death (TR:1% versus transfemoral:0.9%; OR = 0.95 [95% CI, 0.38–2.37]; I2 = 0%), myocardial infarction (transradial:0.2% versus transfemoral:0.3%; OR = 1.53 [95% CI, 0.20–11.61]; I2 = 0%), transient ischemic attack (transradial:0.4% versus transfemoral:1%; OR = 0.46 [95% CI, 0.11–1.95]; I2 = 0%), or access site complications (transradial:2.2% versus transfemoral:1%; OR = 0.97 [95% CI, 0.48–1.98]; I2 = 0%). Conclusion No significant differences were observed in stroke, death, myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack, or access site complications on comparing thetransradial and transfemoral approaches for CAS. The transradial approach shows promise as an alternative method for CAS, offering potential benefits without increased risk of complications. However, further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Background and Purpose Randomized trials proved the benefits of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for select patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) within 24 hours of last-known-well (LKW). Recent data suggest that LVO patients may benefit from MT beyond 24 hours. This study reports the safety and outcomes of MT beyond 24 hours of LKW compared to standard medical therapy (SMT). Methods This is a retrospective analysis of LVO patients presented to 11 comprehensive stroke centers in the United States beyond 24 hours from LKW between January 2015 and December 2021. We assessed 90-day outcomes using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Results Of 334 patients presented with LVO beyond 24 hours, 64% received MT and 36% received SMT only. Patients who received MT were older (67±15 vs. 64±15 years, P=0.047) and had a higher baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS; 16±7 vs.10±9, P

Background Chronic symptomatic internal carotid artery occlusion is an important cause of ischemic strokes. Medical management alone remains suboptimal for secondary prevention, and randomized controlled trials failed to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of extracranial‐intracranial vascular bypass. Carotid occlusion endovascular surgery (COES) is a promising technique, yet its efficacy and safety remain unclear. Methods This systematic review and meta‐analysis included studies in which patients with chronic symptomatic internal carotid artery occlusion underwent treatment with COES and medical management. Primary outcomes included successful reperfusion rates and periprocedural ischemic and hemorrhagic events rates. Secondary outcomes included rates of ischemic events recurrence, other periprocedural events, and mortality. Studies contained at least one of the treatment groups and outcomes of interest. Results Twenty‐two studies were selected for systematic review, with 18 of them for meta‐analysis. From 14 studies (N=561) the rate of successful recanalization was achieved in 74% of all patients undergoing COES. Thirteen studies (N=534) showed that the rate of COES was 2% both for periprocedural ischemic and hemorrhagic events. At long‐term follow‐up, the COES cohort included a total of 10 studies (N=311) and had a 12% rate of ischemic events, while the medical management group, which included 5 studies (N=313), showed a rate of 19%, with nonsignificant subgroup differences (P=0.09, I2, 12%). Rates of other periprocedural mortality were 4% and 1%, respectively. Conclusion This meta‐analysis supports the use of COES as a promising and innovative technique for the secondary prevention of symptomatic internal carotid artery occlusion. Our findings suggest that COES may be superior to medical management alone, although further research is needed to fully evaluate its efficacy and safety.

Background Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is an effective stroke therapy that remains underused. Currently, the use of IVT in patients with recent direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) intake is not recommended. In this study we aim to investigate the safety and efficacy of IVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke and recent DOAC use. Methods and Results A systematic review and meta‐analysis of proportions evaluating IVT with recent DOAC use was conducted. Outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, any intracranial hemorrhage, serious systemic bleeding, and 90‐day functional independence (modified Rankin scale score 0–2). Additionally, rates were compared between patients receiving IVT using DOAC and non‐DOAC by a random effect meta‐analysis to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) for each outcome. Finally, sensitivity analysis for idarucizumab, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and timing of DOAC administration was completed. Fourteen studies with 247 079 patients were included (3610 in DOAC and 243 469 in non‐DOAC). The rates of IVT complications in the DOAC group were 3% (95% CI, 3–4) symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, 12% (95% CI, 7–19) any ICH, and 0.7% (95%CI, 0–1) serious systemic bleeding, and 90‐day functional independence was achieved in 57% (95% CI, 43–70). The rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (3.4 versus 3.5%; OR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.67–1.36]), any intracranial hemorrhage (17.7 versus 17.3%; OR, 1.23 [95% CI, 0.61–2.48]), serious systemic bleeding (0.7 versus 0.6%; OR, 1.27 [95% CI, 0.79–2.02]), and 90‐day modified Rankin scale score 0–2 (46.4 versus 56.8%; OR, 1.21 [95% CI, 0.400–3.67]) did not differ between DOAC and non‐DOAC groups. There was no difference in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rate based on idarucizumab administration. Conclusions Patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with IVT in recent DOAC versus non‐DOAC use have similar rates of hemorrhagic complications and functional independence. Further prospective randomized trials are warranted.

Introduction Flow diversion (FD) has emerged as an effective treatment option for intracranial aneurysms (IAs). However, there is limited evidence regarding its safety and efficacy specifically for distal aneurysms of the posterior circulation including posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA), anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA), superior cerebellar artery (SCA), and the P2 and P3 segment of the posterior cerebral artery (PCA). This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of FD for these aneurysms. Methods A retrospective analysis of a multicentric observational registry was performed between 2014 and 2022. Patients harboring distal aneurysms of the posterior circulation including the PICA, AICA, SCA, and PCA P2‐3 treated with FD were included. Aneurysms characteristics and outcomes were calculated for the total series and a comparison was performed between fusiform/dissecting versus saccular aneurysms. The primary outcome was complete occlusion at last imaging follow up which was defined as per the Raymond Roy occlusion scale. Additional outcomes included the retreatment rate, and thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications Results Overall, 36 patients with 36 aneurysms were treated with FD with a median age in years of 60.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 52.8‐65.3 years). Of those, 13 were fusiform/dissecting while 23 were saccular IAs. Complete occlusion was achieved in 78.1% for all IAs at a median follow‐up of 14.0 months (IQR: 9.3‐48.6 months). There was no significant difference in rates of complete occlusion between fusiform/dissecting (91.7%) and saccular aneurysms (70%, p=0.151). Thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications were observed in four cases (11.1%), and retreatment was required for four IAs (11.4%). There was no significant difference in rates of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications, or retreatment between fusiform/dissecting and saccular IAs Conclusion This study suggests the safety and efficacy of FD for distal aneurysms of the posterior circulation. Further larger‐scale studies are warranted to confirm these findings and to explore the long‐term safety and efficacy of FD in this specific aneurysm population.

Introduction Flow diverters have demonstrated reliable safety and effectiveness for the treatment of selected anterior circulation intracranial aneurysms. However, posterior circulation aneurysms comprise around 10‐15% of all aneurysms, and they frequently present atypical morphological and anatomical characteristics. Furthermore, these lesions have an increased risk of rupture (compared to those in the anterior circulation) with respect to size and higher treatment risks (regardless of the technique). Flow diversion in posterior circulation aneurysms has been described previously with inconsistent clinical and radiological results. Hence, we aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of FDs in fusiform/dissecting vs. saccular aneurysms located in the vertebrobasilar vessels. Methods We performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study including 9 centers. All patients treated with FDs for aneurysms located in the posterior circulation (vertebral and basilar arteries) between 2015 and 2022 were included. Patients were divided into two groups according to the morphology of the aneurysm (fusiform/dissecting vs. saccular). The effectiveness outcome was complete aneurysm occlusion (Raymond‐Roy Class 1) at the latest follow‐up. Safety outcomes included the incidence of ischemic/hemorrhagic and mortality. After adjusting for confounders multivariable logistic regressions were performed to compare outcomes of interest. Results A total of 147 patients with 147 aneurysms were included. The fusiform/dissecting group included 85 cases, while the saccular group 62. The saccular group had older patients (median age: fusiform/dissecting, 55 years [45‐64] vs. saccular, 63 years [51‐70.0]; p=.02). The number of female patients was not different between groups (fusiform/dissecting, 42% vs. saccular, 58%; p=.05). Clinical presentation, comorbidities, modified Fisher, and Hunt and Hess were similar. Baseline modified Rankin Score (mRS) was different (mRS 0‐2: fusiform/dissecting, 84% vs. saccular, 98%; p=.030). Previous endovascular treatment (p=.396) was similar. Aneurysm location (most were in the vertebral artery: fusiform/dissecting, 60% vs. saccular, 42%; p=.009) was different. Median aneurysm size (fusiform/dissecting, 10.0 mm [6.5‐18.8] vs. saccular, 5.9 [3.0‐10.0]; p=1 FD: fusiform/dissecting, 36% vs. saccular, 10%; p=

Introduction The optimal endovascular approach for wide‐neck intracranial aneurysms (IAs) during the acute phase of bleeding remains uncertain, and the use of stent‐assisted coiling or flow diversion is controversial due to antiplatelet therapy requirements and potential risks (1, 2). Various techniques have been developed to address these challenges, including balloon‐assisted coiling (BAC) and intrasaccular flow‐disruption. The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) is a flow disrupter that has gained popularity in treating ruptured IAs due to its effectiveness in occluding aneurysms with minimal rebleeding (3, 4). The aim of this study is to provide outcome comparisons between WEB and BAC in a specific cohort of patients with ruptured wide‐necked IAs. Methods In this international cohort study, we included consecutive patients treated for ruptured wide‐neck IAs with either WEB or BAC at three neurovascular centers. The primary effectiveness outcome was complete aneurysm occlusion at the final imaging follow‐up using the Raymond‐Roy (RR) occlusion classification. Secondary outcomes included favorable functional outcome and periprocedural hemorrhagic/ischemia‐related complications. Comparisons were performed using multivariable logistic and ordinal regressions. Results One hundred four patients treated with WEB and 107 patients treated with BAC were included. The mean length of imaging follow‐up was 17.5 (± 17.6) months in the WEB group and 11.8 (± 10.3) months in the BAC group (p = 0.142). Of the patients, 60.5% in the WEB group and 53% in the BAC group achieved complete occlusion, with no significant difference between the two groups after adjusting for covariates (adjusted OR [aOR] = 1.02; 95% CI 0.46 – 2.25; p = 0.964). The odds of favorable functional outcome did not significantly differ between the WEB (74.8%) and BAC groups (77.4%, aOR = 1.45; 95% CI 0.65 – 3.24; p = 0.368). Procedure‐related complications were similar in both groups (WEB: 9.6%, BAC: 10.3%, p = 0.872). There was no statistically significant difference observed in the rates of ischemic events (WEB: 6.7% vs. BAC: 2.8%, p = 0.180) and hemorrhagic events (WEB: 3.8% vs. BAC: 7.5%, p = 0.255) between the two groups. Conclusion In conclusion, both WEB and BAC techniques showed similar effectiveness and safety outcomes in treating ruptured wide‐neck IAs. Further research and direct comparative studies are needed to better guide treatment decisions for this patient population.

Introduction Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) often fails to achieve successful reperfusion in up to 20% of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) [1, 2]. Rescue strategies options, including balloon angioplasty alone, rescue stenting (RS) alone, or stent with balloon angioplasty, have shown promise in observational studies and meta‐analyses [3, 4]. We aimed to evaluate the association between RS with functional outcomes compared to medical management (MM) in anterior circulation LVO‐AIS patients who underwent failed MT. Methods This retrospective cohort study utilized prospectively collected data from the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology (SVIN) Registry, including adult patients with AIS who experienced a failed MT at 14 comprehensive stroke centers. A failed MT was defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score of 0 to 2a after multiple attempts to clot retrieval. The patients were divided into two groups: those who received RS and those who only received MM. The primary efficacy outcome was the shift in the degree of disability, as measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), at 90 days. Additional outcomes included functional independence (defined as a 90‐day mRS score of 0‐2), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality at 90 days. These outcomes were assessed using uni‐ and multivariable logistic regression models. Results A total of 642 patients were included in the analysis. The RS group consisted of 294 (45.8%) patients, while the MM group comprised 348 (54.2%) patients. A mTICI score of 2b‐3 was achieved in 242/293 (82.6%) patients in the RS group. Compared to the MM group, the RS showed a favorable shift in the overall 90‐day mRS distribution (adjusted common odds ratio [OR]=1.97, 95% CI 1.36–2.85, p=

Introduction Rapid expansion of mechanical thrombectomy and swift manufacturing development has translated into significant evolution of large bore catheter technology. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association among diverse structural components of large bore aspiration catheters on procedural performance. Methods Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained mechanical thrombectomy consortium (SVIN Registry) treated with stand‐alone contact aspiration for the first pass in the MCA M1 or intracranial ICA occlusions from 2012‐2021. Catheters were stratified based on construction materials, tip technology, catheter sizing, and catheter lining. Factors associated with first pass effect (FPE ‐ first‐pass eTICI2c‐3 reperfusion) as well as speed of clot engagement were analyzed. Results We identified 983 patients with proximal occlusion and aspiration as the first pass technique. FPE was observed in 34% and associated with age (OR:1.016;95%CI:1.006‐1.027), cardioembolic stroke etiology (OR:1.685;95%CI:1.77 ‐2.41), MCA M1(OR:2.737;95%CI:1.091 ‐1.867), non‐general anesthesia (OR:0.546;95%CI:0.389 ‐0.767), as well as with 0.070” (OR:2.038;95%CI:1.099 ‐3.779) and 0.088” (OR:3.899;95%CI:1.582 ‐9.606) distal catheter inner diameter in the adjusted analysis. Median time from arterial access to clot contact was 17 minutes with faster times observed in younger patients (OR:0.986;95%CI:0.975 ‐0.996) as well as with the use of aspiration catheters with shorter length of distal outer hydrophilic coating (18‐30cm) on multivariable regression (OR:0.303; 95%CI:0.113‐0.816). Conclusion Larger aspiration catheter distal inner diameter was associated with higher rates of FPE. Aspiration catheters with reduced distal tip hydrophilic coating were associated with faster arterial access to clot contact time.

Introduction Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has emerged as a viable alternative to carotid endarterectomy for managing carotid artery stenosis in high‐risk patients (1). While the transfemoral arterial approach (TF) remains the preferred method, it is associated with inherent limitations and potential complications (2‐4). Consequently, exploring the transradial artery access (TR) as a potential option becomes crucial in optimizing patient outcomes and procedural success rates. Limited data exists comparing the outcomes of TR approach in CAS to TF approach. This study aims to systematically review and meta‐analyze the outcomes and complication rates between TR and TF access for CAS. Methods A systematic electronic search was conducted in four databases up to May 10th, 2023. Studies with randomized or non‐randomized designs, involving CAS through TR or TF approach, were included. Outcomes of interest were stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), death, myocardial infarction (MI), and access site complications. A meta‐analysis was performed, analyzing pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to assess the effect size of the vascular access approaches. Results Six studies with a total of 6,917 patients were included, out of which 602 (8.7%) underwent the TR approach, and 6,315 (91.3%) underwent the TF approach. Meta‐analysis results showed no significant difference in stroke occurrence between TR and TF groups (TR: 1.7% vs. TF: 1.9%; OR = 0.98; 95% CI 0.49 – 1.96; I2 = 0%). Similarly, no significant difference was found in death (TR: 1% vs. TF: 0.9%; OR = 0.95; 95% CI 0.38 – 2.37; I2 = 0%), MI (TR: 0.2% vs. TF: 0.3%; OR = 1.53; 95% CI 0.20 – 11.61; I2 = 0%), TIA (TR: 0.4% vs. TF: 1%; OR = 0.46; 95% CI 0.11 – 1.95; I2 = 0%), and access site complications (TR: 2.2% vs. TF: 1%; OR = 0.97; 95% CI 0.48 – 1.98; I2 = 0%). Conclusion In the comparison of TR and TF approaches for CAS, no significant differences were observed in stroke, death, MI, TIA, or access site complications. TR approach shows promise as an alternative method for CAS, offering potential benefits without increased risk of complications. However, further studies are needed to confirm these findings and establish guidelines for optimal access site selection.

Background Procedural intravenous cangrelor has been proposed as an effective platelet inhibition strategy for stenting in acute ischemic stroke. We aimed to compare the safety profile of low‐dose intravenous cangrelor versus dual oral antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) loading in patients with acute cervical tandem lesions. Methods We retrospectively identified cases from an international multicenter cohort who underwent intraprocedural administration of intravenous cangrelor (15 μg/kg followed by an infusion of 2 μg/kg per min) or DAPT loading during acute tandem lesions intervention. Safety outcomes included rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, parenchymal hematoma type 2, petechial hemorrhage, and in‐stent thrombosis. Inverse probability of treatment weighting matching was used to reduce confounding. Results From 691 patients, we included 195 patients, 30 of whom received intravenous cangrelor and 165 DAPT. The DAPT regimens were aspirin+clopidogrel (93.3%) or aspirin+ticagrelor (6.6%). After inverse probability of treatment weighting, the patients treated with cangrelor were not at greater odds of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (odds ratio [OR], 1.30 [95% CI, 0.09–17.3]; P=0.837), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage–parenchymal hematoma type 2 (OR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.05–4.98]; P=0.589), or petechial hemorrhage (OR, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.38–3.28]; P=0.836). Similarly, the rate of in‐stent thrombosis was not significantly different between the 2 groups (1.8% versus 0%; P=0.911). Conclusion Cangrelor at the half dose of the myocardial infarction protocol showed a similar safety profile compared with the commonly used DAPT loading protocols in patients with acute tandem lesions. Further studies with larger samples are warranted to elucidate the safety of antiplatelet therapy in tandem lesions.

Background Flow diverters are now considered first‐line tools for treating intracranial aneurysms. However, few devices are available for patients with large‐diameter vessels (LDVs). Hence, we evaluated the performance of the largest diameter Surpass Streamline for aneurysms in LDVs. Methods We performed a subanalysis of the SESSIA (Safety and Efficacy of the Surpass Streamline for Intracranial Aneurysms) multicenter cohort study of patients treated with Surpass Streamline between 2018 and 2021. Patients in whom a 5‐mm diameter Surpass Streamline was implanted were divided into 2 groups according to vessel diameter at the landing zones (LDV, ≥5.3 mm versus non‐LDV [N‐LDV],

Background When mechanical thrombectomy (MT) fails to achieve successful reperfusion, rescue stenting (RS) has proven to be a feasible rescue therapy. However, the available evidence remains underpowered to assess clinical outcomes. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of RS versus routine medical management in patients with failed MT using an aggregated meta‐analysis. Methods A systematic review was performed from inception to July 2022 of all studies using RS after failed MT. Outcomes of interest included a modified Rankin scale score of 0–2 at 90 days, successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b–3) after RS and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. A random‐effects meta‐analysis between the RS and medical treatment arms was performed to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) for each outcome. We assessed the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Statistical heterogeneity across studies was assessed with I2 statistics. Results A total of 12 studies included 1855 participants, 729 in the RS arm and 1126 in the medical treatment arm. The pooled results indicated that RS was associated with a significantly higher proportion of patients with a modified Rankin scale score of 0–2 at 90 days (RS: 41% versus 21%; OR,3.27; [95% CI 2.08–5.16]; I2=64%; moderate‐certainty evidence) and a decreased risk of mortality at 90 days (RS: 22.5% versus 33.8%; OR, 0.47; [95% CI 0.32–0.69]; I2=45%; low‐certainty evidence), compared with medical treatment after failed MT. The pooled rate of successful reperfusion after RS was 87% (95% CI 82–91; I2=57%; low‐certainty evidence). The rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage did not differ between groups (RS: 8.5% versus 11.7%; OR, 0.85; [95% CI 0.59–1.20]; I2=7%; low‐certainty evidence). Conclusion RS is a promising strategy for maximizing recovery in acute stroke patients after first line MT fails to achieve meaningful reperfusion. However, randomized trials using a standardized approach/technique and MT failure definition are warranted to confirm these results.

Introduction The safe and effective profile of flow diverters (FD) has allowed neuro‐interventionalists to consider them as a versatile tool for the treatment of aneurysms with different morphologies, locations, and characteristics. Optimal deployment with complete wall apposition affects FD performance. However, few devices are suitable for aneurysms in large caliber vessels. Herein, we aimed to describe the safety and efficacy of a large caliber (5 mm) FD for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Methods We performed a retrospective, multi‐center cohort study of adult patients in whom a 5 mm Surpass Streamline FD was implanted between 2018 and 2021 in the United States. Efficacy outcome was complete occlusion at final follow‐up. Safety outcomes were ischemic/hemorrhagic events and mortality up to 30 days following the procedure. Secondary safety was assessed by the rate of adjunctive devices/treatments to overcome technical complications and improve wall apposition. Results A total of 29 patients harboring 29 aneurysms were treated with 39 FDs (36 large‐diameter devices). Mean age was 57.8 ± 15.7 years. Aneurysm morphologies were saccular (n = 15), pseudoaneurysm (n = 7), fusiform (n = 6), and dissecting (n = 1). Locations were internal carotid artery (ICA) petro‐cavernous segment (n = 15), ICA paraophthalmic (n = 5), ICA cervical (n = 4), basilar artery (n = 3), and vertebral artery (n = 2). Aneurysm size mean was 11.4 ± 6.7 mm, and neck size mean 6.5 ± 3.9 mm. Proximal FD landing zone vessel diameter was 4.8 ± 1.3 mm and distal 4.5 ± 1.2 mm. At a mean final follow‐up of 12 ± 6 months, 18 (65%) aneurysms were completely occluded. Ischemic/hemorrhagic events occurred in 2 (7%), and 1 patient died during hospitalization. Balloon‐assisted angioplasty was performed in 19 (66%) cases, adjunctive stenting in 8 (28%), and coiling in 1 (3%). Patients who received an adjunctive device/treatment had an 82% (14/17) complete occlusion compared to 66% (4/6) in those who did not. Conclusions The use of large caliber FDs to treat complex intracranial aneurysms located in large‐diameter dysplastic vessels is technically feasible and safe. The use of adjunctive devices and techniques to achieve optimal wall apposition seems crucial to optimize treatment outcomes. Comparative studies with devices specially designed for this patient population might provide further insights into the best device selection.

Introduction The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device was originally approved to treat intracranial wide‐necked saccular bifurcation aneurysms. Recent studies have suggested its use for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms (IA) in alternative locations with variable success. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the WEB for IAs in off‐labeled locations using a meta‐analysis (MA) of the literature. Methods We performed a systematic review of all studies including patients treated with WEB for IAs in locations different than what is currently on‐label FDA until May 2022. Our primary efficacy and safety outcomes were adequate occlusion at last follow up and a composite of intraprocedural and postprocedural complications, respectively. The Raymond‐Roy (RR) scale and the Bicêtre Occlusion Scale Score (BOSS) were used to define complete (RR: 1; BOSS: 0‐0’) and adequate (RR:1‐2; BOSS: 0–2) occlusion. Additional safety outcomes included intraprocedural (thromboembolic, hemorrhagic, device deployment, or air embolism) and postprocedural (ischemic or hemorrhagic) complications, and mortality. We performed a random‐effects MA of proportions and assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. Statistical heterogeneity across studies was assessed with I2 statistics. Logistic regression of the patient level data was used to study the predictors of complete occlusion. Results Ten studies were selected, and 285 patients (79% female; mean age 58 years) with 288 aneurysms (35% ruptured) were included. Adequate and complete occlusion rates were 89% (95% CI 81–94%; I2 = 0%; moderate‐certainty evidence) and 64% (95% CI 57–70%; I2 = 13%; moderate‐certainty evidence), respectively. The composite safety outcome rate was 8% (95% CI 3–17%; I2 = 34%; very low‐certainty evidence). The intraprocedural and postprocedural complication rates were 6% (95% CI 4–10%; I2 = 0%; very low‐certainty evidence) and 1% (95% CI 0–1%; I2 = 33%; very low‐certainty evidence), respectively. The mortality rate was 2% (95% CI 1–7%; I2 = 0%; very low‐certainty evidence). Aneurysm width (OR = 0.5; p = 0.03) was the only significant predictor of complete occlusion. Conclusions The preliminary studies evaluating the use of WEB for the treatment of IAs in off‐labeled locations has demonstrated rates of adequate occlusion and procedural complications comparable to the landmark studies that evaluated the use of the WEB for on‐label bifurcation aneurysms. Given the level of evidence, we consider the interpretation of our results should be done cautiously until confirmation from larger prospective studies are obtained.

Introduction Actual guidelines offer little guidance for endovascular treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and pre‐morbid disability (PMD). Often, patients with a mRS >2 are not considered for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) and might not be given the best chance of achieving recovery. Three recent meta‐analysis have showed conflicting results regarding the benefit of MT, while persistently showing a significant increase in mortality. Methods We conducted a systematic search in Embase, Medline, and Web of Science for studies of patients with AIS and PMD who were treated with MT or MM. We included all definitions of PMD, main outcomes were favorable functionality at 90‐days (mRS 0–2 or return to baseline mRS), symptomatic ICH, and mortality. We performed meta‐analyses using a random‐effect model, and I2 to evaluate heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were used when appropriate. Results 2 studies contained data comparing PMD patients treated with MT versus MM, 14 studies contained data only of patients treated with MT, and 10 only of patients treated with MM; they provided data of 1071 patients in the MT group and 4547 in the MM group. Pooled rates in the MT group were 28% (95% CI 0.24‐0.32) for favorable functionality, 7% (95% CI 0.04‐0.12) for sICH, 43% (95% CI 0.36‐0.51) for 90‐days mortality, 18% (95% CI 0.14‐0.23) for intra‐hospital mortality, and pooled reperfusion rate (mTICI 0–2) of 80% (95% CI 0.72‐0.86). In a meta‐analysis of proportion with the treatments modalities as subgroups, including only studies with a similar definition of PMD, we obtained: for favorable functionality, MT = 26% (95% CI 0.23‐0.30) vs. MM = 35% (95% CI 0.22‐0.51); for sICH, MT = 6% (95% CI 0.05‐0.08) vs. MM = 6% (95% CI 0.05‐0.08); for 90‐days mortality, MT = 48% (95% CI 0.44‐0.52) vs. MM = 34% (95% CI 0.27‐0.41); and for in‐hospital mortality, MT = 18% (95% CI 0.14‐0.23) vs. MM = 22% (95% CI 0.17‐0.28). Additionally, meta‐analysis for 90‐days mortality in MT studies, showed a pooled rate of 49% (95% CI 0.45‐0.53) for the high tPA rate subgroup, and 30% (95% CI 0.19‐0.44) for the low tPA rate subgroup. Conclusions Up to one third of PMD patients who undergo MT might achieve favorable functionality, without increasing the risk of sICH and with rates similar to those obtained with MM. Furthermore, we observed a high 90‐day mortality rate, in both MT and MM groups. In subgroups exploration, there is trend of high tPA rates to be associated with the increased mortality. It is urgent to identify PMD patients who will benefit from MT and factors associated with poor outcomes.

Introduction Improvements in the safety and efficacy of curative embolization for brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) have allowed to achieve comparable results to microsurgical resection and radiosurgery, especially for low‐grade bAVMs (Spetzler Martin [SM] grade I and II). However, whether this treatment modality is beneficial in the pediatric population remains unknown. Hence, we assessed the safety and efficacy of curative embolization for low‐grade bAVMs in children. In addition, we determined predictors of intraprocedural complications and predictors of complete occlusion in one embolization session. Methods Between 2010 and 2022, a retrospective analysis of all pediatric (≤18 years) patients who underwent curative embolization for low‐grade bAVMs was conducted at two institutions. Demographic data, clinical presentation, SM grade, and procedural characteristics were retrieved. The safety (intraprocedural complications and mortality) and efficacy (complete angiographic obliteration after the last embolization session) were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify potential predictive factors of intraprocedural complications and complete occlusion in one session. For selected variables, odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p value of the likelihood‐ratio test were presented. Results Sixty‐eight patients (41 females; mean age 12.9 ± 3.6 years) underwent a total of 102 embolization sessions. Fifty‐one bAVMs (75%) presented ruptured, and headache was the most common clinical presentation (50%). There were 24 (35%) SM grade I lesions and 44 (65%) grade II. Onyx was the most used embolic agent (33%) and the transarterial approach was the most common (93%). The mean volume of embolic agents in each patient was 2.4 ml (range 0.2 to 7.5 ml). Fourteen intraprocedural complications (14% of procedures) were observed and no deaths were reported. The most common complication was microcatheter‐related vessel perforation (6%). Single venous drainage decreased the risk of intraprocedural complications (OR = 0.19; 95% CI 0.04 – 0.78). Complete angiographic obliteration was achieved in 44 patients (65%). In 35 patients (52%) the bAVM was occluded with a single session. A small bAVM size was predictor of complete occlusion in one session (OR = 0.42; 95% CI 0.21 – 0.73). Conclusions Curative embolization in pediatric low‐grade bAVMs can be performed with an acceptable complete occlusion rate but with a high rate of intraprocedural complications. The risk of intraprocedural complications was low in bAVMs with a single venous drainage. The odds of complete occlusion in one session are high in small bAVMs. Curative embolization should be selected on an individual basis in order to achieve optimal results.

Introduction Posterior communicating artery (PComA) aneurysms are common and have a high risk of rupture. Flow diverters (FD) have demonstrated a safe and effective profile. However, the use of FD in PComA aneurysms has shown controversial results with high rates of recurrence and a high risk of potential ischemic complications. There, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of flow diversion for the treatment of PComA aneurysms with a meta‐analysis of the literature. Methods We performed a systematic search in Scopus, Embase, Medline, and Web of Science from inception until May 2022 for all the studies that reported the safety and effectiveness of FD for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms located in the posterior communicating artery. The primary effectiveness endpoint was a complete aneurysm occlusion rate at final follow‐up. The primary safety endpoint was a composite measure of cumulative events that occurred during and after the procedure. Events included death and ischemic/hemorrhagic complications. Random‐effects meta‐analysis was used to calculate proportions. Statistical heterogeneity across studies was assessed with I2 statistics. Results A total of 13 studies with 397 patients harboring 403 aneurysms were included in our analysis. Mean age was 48 years and mean aneurysm size was 5.3 mm. Complete aneurysm occlusion at final follow‐up was 74% (95% CI 66–81%; I2 = 54%). The primary safety composite outcome was 5% (95% CI 3–9%; I2 = 0%). The mortality rate was 1% (95% CI 0–2%; I2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis showed that patients with a non‐fetal PComA had a higher rate (76%; 95% CI 62%‐86%; I2 = 53%) of complete aneurysm occlusion compared to those with a fetal PComA (36%; 95% CI 21%‐54%; I2 = 0%). Conclusions Our findings show that flow diversion for the treatment of aneurysms located in the PComA is effective and safe. However, the same treatment for aneurysms located in a fetal‐type PComA did not show the same efficacy profile suggesting that these cases might require an alternative treatment to achieve permanent occlusion rates.

Introduction Recent studies have shown beneficial effects of Carotid artery stenting (CAS) in acute ischemic stroke patients with tandem lesions (TL). However, stent placement requires the use of antiplatelet medications to prevent in‐stent thrombosis and re‐occlusion of the artery. This must be balanced with the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage. In this multicenter study, we aimed to investigate the safety and feasibility of using antiplatelet regimens in patients with anterior circulation stroke with TLs. Methods Patient level data were pooled from 17 centers and included patients with intracranial occlusion of ICA or M1/M2 segment of MCA with a concomitant extracranial ICA occlusion or stenosis ≥ 50%. Inclusion criteria were; age ≥ 18 years, EVT for intracranial occlusion, and underwent treatment for extracranial ICA lesions demonstrated on CTA and/or DSA. Patients were divided into groups according to the number of antiplatelets administered at the time of endovascular therapy (EVT) procedure into four groups including; 1) no antiplatelets, 2) single oral antiplatelet, 3) dual antiplatelets, and 4) intravenous antiplatelets (in combination of single or dual antiplatelets). Multivariable logistic regression models with multiple imputations were built to assess the association of primary outcome; symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and secondary outcomes including; modified Rankin Score (mRS) 0–2 at 90 days, and successful reperfusion (mTICI score ≥ 2b). Results A total of 682 patients were included. Of these, 138 (20.2%) did not receive any antiplatelet therapy, while 143 (20.97%) were treated with single oral, 207 (30.35%) with dual oral, and 194 (28.5%) with intravenous combined with single or dual antiplatelets. The rate of favorable outcome was non‐significantly higher in the dual (53%) and IV‐combination (54.4%) antiplatelets, as compared with single (38.9%) and without antiplatelet (38.6%) medications. In the multivariable model, after adjusting, there was no significant differences in the sICH (single: aOR: 1.07, CI: 0.62‐1.84, p = 0.8, dual: aOR: 1.18, CI: 0.70‐1.99, p = 0.55, IV‐combination: aOR: 1.01, CI: 0.57‐1.78, p = 0.98) and functional outcome at 90 days (single: aOR: 1.15, CI: 0.63‐2.12, p = 0.64, dual: aOR: 1.03, CI: 0.55‐1.9, p = 0.9, IV‐combination: aOR: 0.83, CI: 0.42‐1.64, p = 0.59) among the study groups. Interestingly, successful reperfusion (mTICI score ≥ 2b) was significantly higher in dual oral and IV‐combination antiplatelets (single: aOR: 1.14, CI: 0.61‐2.14, p = 0.69, dual: aOR: 4.82, CI: 2.23‐10.42, p = < 0.001, IV‐combination: aOR: 3.65, CI: 1.71‐7.79, p = 0.001). Conclusions Administration of antiplatelet medications during EVT was associated with successful reperfusion without increasing the rate of symptomatic hemorrhage in patients with anterior circulation LVO with TLs. Further large‐scale randomized studies are warranted to validate the optimal antiplatelet regimens during acute carotid artery stenting in patients with TLs.

Introduction Despite the irrefutable benefit of mechanical thrombectomy for patients with isolated intracranial large vessel occlusions (LVO), the effect of endovascular treatment in patients with tandem lesions remains unclear. In this study from the multi‐center PICASSO registry, we compare efficacy and safety outcomes in TLs patients treated in the early versus late window. Methods In this study, we used the data from the multi‐center PICASSO (Proximal Internal Carotid Artery Acute Stroke Secondary to Tandem Occlusion Thrombectomy) registry. PICASSO collaboration is a retrospective observational registry from 17 stroke centers. We compared efficacy and safety outcomes in TLs patients treated in the early versus late window. Patients were divided into two groups depending on last known well (LKW) to puncture time: Early time‐window group (

Introduction Flow diverters (FDs) have demonstrated a safe and effective profile for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms with complex morphologies and variable anatomic locations. However, aneurysmal persistence after flow diversion still presents in up to 25% of treated aneurysms. Herein, we aimed to perform a pooled analysis of two large studies (SCENT [Surpass Intracranial Aneurysm Embolization System Pivotal Trial to Treat Large or Giant Neck Wide Neck Aneurysms] and SESSIA [Safety and Efficacy of the Surpass Streamline for Intracranial Aneurysms]) to evaluate the predictors of occlusion at final follow‐up after treatment with a 72–96 wire device. Methods We pooled all data from the SCENT (prospective) and SESSIA (retrospective) studies that included patients treated with the Surpass Streamline. From the studies, a subset of patients with unruptured saccular aneurysms located in the internal carotid artery (ICA) up to its terminus were included. The authors collected baseline demographics, comorbidities, aneurysm dimensions, and procedural and follow‐up characteristics for each patient. For our analysis, the outcome was complete aneurysm occlusion, as reported by the studies. We performed a multivariable logistic regression to identify the predictors of complete occlusion. Next, we performed a mediation analysis framework to identify the causal relationship of the predictors with the outcome. Finally, we calculated the predicted probability of occlusion for the continuous predictors. Results A total of 348 patients with 348 aneurysms were included, 394 devices were implanted (1.13 per patient). Median age was 61 [22‐85] years, and 83.6% were females. Hypertension was the most common comorbidity (57%) followed by hyperlipidemia (36%). The ICA paraophthalmic segment was the most common location (45%), followed by the petrocavernous (29%) and supraclinoid (25%). Median aneurysm size was 7.5 [1‐29] mm, and neck size was 4.3 [1‐23] mm. At the final follow‐up, the complete occlusion rate was 73% (255/348). After adjusting for confounders and accounting for collinearity, the multivariable analysis identified aneurysm size (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.85‐0.93;p< .001), procedural technical events (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.15‐0.65;p = .002), and first device length (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.96‐1.00;p = .036) as predictors of complete occlusion. Age had a non‐significant direct effect on complete occlusion (p = .091) but a significant indirect effect mediated through aneurysm size (p< .001) and technical events (p< .02). Using our model, the predicted probability of occlusion is≥ 75% in aneurysms measuring < 10 mm when no technical events are encountered. However, when technical events are encountered, the probability decreases to 50–75%. Conclusions Successful aneurysm occlusion after flow diversion is associated with aneurysm size, procedural technical events, and FD length. Age does not directly affect occlusion, but its influence is mediated through the aneurysm size and technical events. Therefore, a priori knowledge of the patient and aneurysm characteristics might guide FD selection to favor the best treatment outcomes.

Introduction Continued advancements in the treatments for neurological disease have helped interventionalists to refine approaches that offer improved surgical efficacy and patient outcomes. Carotid‐artery stenting (CAS) is a safe and effective alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA), that allows for revascularization of the internal carotid artery (ICA) in a minimally‐invasive manner. Traditionally, the mainstay for CAS has been through the femoral artery; however, patients with carotid‐artery disease (CAD) often have concomitant peripheral artery disease which confer increased risk of significant life‐threatening access‐site complications, such as retroperitoneal hematoma and limb ischemia. Given this, CAS via the radial artery has become increasingly popular. This study seeks to investigate the safety and feasibility of the transradial approach (TRA), in comparison to the traditional transfemoral approach (TFA), for carotid‐artery stenting. Methods The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of all adult patients (age >18) who underwent carotid‐artery stenting via TRA or TFA over a 4‐year study period (2018‐2021) across 4 different international academic centers. Important variables, such as patient demographics, comorbidities, procedural details, results, and complications were collected. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the strength of association and correlation for these variables. Results A total of 313 patients were enrolled during the study period. CAS via TFA was attempted in 251 patients and via TRA in 62 patients, respectively. Overall, CAS via TRA was found to be successful in 48/62 (76%) patients, and via TFA in 246/251 (98%) patients. Baseline demographics were similar for the two groups, with a female gender predilection, median age of 69, and hypertension and hyperlipidemia serving as the most common medical comorbidities. 14/62 (22.6%) patients who underwent TRA were converted to TFA. Spasm of the radial artery, kinking of the catheter and severe tortuosity of the vessels were the primary reasons for access site conversion. A total of five major access site‐related complications, including two deaths, and seven minor complications were noted in the TFA cohort. No serious access related complications were noted in the TRA group. In the multivariate‐analysis, after adjusting for age, hyperlipidemia, chronic heart failure, combination of stent plus angioplasty and fluoroscopy times, there was no statistically significant difference observed among the 2 groups in terms of procedural (OR: 0.31; CI: 0.36‐2.69; P = 0.29) and overall access site complications (OR: 0.17, CI: 0.02‐1.98, P = 0.16). Conclusions TRA seems to be a safe alternative approach for carotid stenting. In our cohort, no serious access site‐related complications were noted with TRA in comparison to the TFA group. Continued improvements in terms of patient selection, sample size, as well as advances in technique and technology will help to further refine TRA for CAS. Further studies and analysis will need to be performed to delineate the crucial variables that contribute to improved functional outcomes for these patients.

Introduction The incidence of ruptured cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) has increased as a consequence of the publication of the ARUBA trial. In the setting of ruptured AVMs, target embolization of high‐risk features can be considered to decrease the risk for recurrent hemorrhage. However, embolization with the intention to cure has not been well studied in ruptured AVMs. Furthermore, the role of primary curative embolization of pediatric AVMs is uncertain. Hence, we aimed to characterize the safety and efficacy of curative embolization for ruptured AVMs in pediatric patients. Methods Between 2010 and 2022, a retrospective analysis of all pediatric (≤18 years) patients who underwent curative embolization for ruptured AVMs was conducted in two institutions. Demographic data, clinical presentation, Spetzler‐Martin (SM) grade, associated high‐risk vascular structures, and procedural characteristics were retrieved. The safety (intraprocedural complications and mortality) and efficacy (complete angiographic obliteration after the last embolization session) were evaluated. Results Sixty‐eight patients (38 females; mean age 12.4 ± 3.4 years) underwent a total of 109 embolization sessions. The most frequent clinical presentation was headache (79%). There were 15 (22%) SM grade I lesions, 34 (51%) grade II, 14 (21%) grade III, and 4 (6%) grade IV. In 21 patients, twenty‐three high‐risk structures were observed (3 prenidal aneurysms, 12 intranidal aneurysms, 3 venous aneurysms, 2 varicose veins, 3 arteriovenous fistulae). Decompressive craniectomy with intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation was performed in 15 patients (22%). The mean number of sessions per patient was 1.6 (range 1 to 6) and n‐butyl cyanoacrylate was the most used embolic agent (30%). The transarterial approach was the most common (91%). The mean volume of embolic agents in each patient was 2.1 ml (range 0.1 to 6 ml). Seventeen intraprocedural complications (16% of procedures) were observed and no deaths were reported. In patients with high‐risk structures the rate of intraprocedural complications was 24%. The most common complication was microcatheter‐related vessel perforation (7%). Complete angiographic obliteration was achieved in 42 patients (62%). In 30 patients (44%) the AVM was occluded with a single embolization session. The rate of complete obliteration in patients with high‐risk structures was 62%. Conclusions Curative embolization of ruptured pediatric AVMs shows a high rate of intraprocedural complications, especially when high‐risk associated vascular structures are present. In addition, acceptable complete obliteration rates were found. Appropriate long‐term follow‐up in prospective studies tailored to the pediatric population are required to determine the best therapeutic approach.

Introduction There are two approaches for treating stroke patients with tandem occlusions: the anterograde approach (AA, extracranial lesions first) and the retrograde approach (RA, intracranial lesion first). Both techniques are associated with favorable functional outcomes. We aimed to compare both techniques for efficacy and safety outcomes in a multicenter study. Methods Patient data were pooled from 17 centers and divided into AA and RA groups. We performed multivariable logistic regressions to evaluate the association between each group with efficacy and safety outcomes. Results 552 patients were included in the study, 270 (48.4%) were treated with the AA, and 288 (51.6%) with the RA. There were no differences between groups for functional outcome (mRS 0–2) at 90 days (aOR = 0.93, 95%CI: 0.58‐1.48, p = 0.75), and successful reperfusion [mTICI >2b] (aOR = 0.83, 95%CI: 0.44‐1.56, p = 0.57). Similarly, we did not observe any differences for safety outcomes related to sICH (OR = 0.57, 95%CI: 0.25‐1.29, p = 0.18), parenchymal hematoma type 2 (OR = 0.61, 95%CI: 0.3‐1.22, p = 0.16), and all‐cause mortality at 90 days (OR = 1.22, 95%CI: 0.66‐2.26, p = 0.52). However, the median puncture‐to‐reperfusion time was higher in AA compared with RA [59 minutes (IQR: 38–92) vs 53.5 minuntes (IQR: 37–87)]. Conclusions The AA and RA approaches for the treatment of tandem occlusions seem to achieve similar efficacy and safety outcomes. These results are consistent with those of a previous multi‐center study. Additionally, and in line with previous research, there is a puncture‐to‐reperfusion time difference between both approaches, which suggests a potential benefit when using the RA. However, further prospective randomized studies are needed to elucidate its benefit in achieving better clinical outcomes.

Background Current evidence comparing flow diverters (FDs) for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms is limited to single‐arm head‐to‐head retrospective and prospective studies. Herein, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of four FDs for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Methods We performed a retrospective, multicenter international cohort study of adult patients treated with FDs (Pipeline embolization device, Surpass Streamline, Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device, and Silk) for intracranial aneurysms between 2015 and 2021. Efficacy was determined by aneurysm occlusion at final follow‐up. Safety was determined by ischemic/hemorrhagic events and mortality. Secondary safety was assessed by technical complications. A mixed‐effect multivariable ordinal and logistic regression were performed to evaluate variables that predicted the outcomes of interest. Results We included 235 patients with 274 aneurysms. Treatment was performed with either the Pipeline embolization device (92), Surpass Streamline (56), Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (47), and Silk (40). Median age was 57 (47–65) years. Most patients were asymptomatic (76%), and 8% had previous rupture. Most aneurysms were saccular (85%) and anterior (94%). The Pipeline embolization device subgroup had the largest aneurysms (6 mm, P=0.005). Median follow‐up time was 9 (6–14) months. Final overall complete occlusion was 72% without significant differences between FDs (P=0.5). Total ischemic (5%) and hemorrhagic (3%) events were also similar (P=0.1 and P=0.06). One patient expired (0.4%, P=0.6). In multivariable analysis, device diameter predicted aneurysm persistence and ≥50% in‐stent stenosis predicted ischemic/hemorrhagic complications. Conclusions Our findings comparing 4commonly used FDs in a heterogeneous population with mainly small‐sized aneurysms confirmed a similar safety and efficacy profile between devices.

Background Balloon‐assisted coiling (BAC) and stent‐assisted coiling (SAC) have been established as feasible approaches to manage ruptured wide‐necked intracranial aneurysms. Antiplatelet medications used with SAC theoretically increase risk of thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications. This study aims to evaluate safety and efficacy of SAC versus BAC for acutely ruptured wide‐necked intracranial aneurysms. Methods We performed a 2‐center retrospective observational study of consecutive patients treated with SAC or BAC for ruptured wide‐necked intracranial aneurysms from 2015 to 2020. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and aneurysm characteristics were collected. Primary and secondary efficacy outcomes were radiographic aneurysm occlusion at follow‐up and functional status at 3 months. Safety outcomes included periprocedural hemorrhagic/ischemic complications and symptomatic ventriculostomy tract and cerebrospinal shunt hemorrhage rates. Univariable and multivariable analyses with multiple imputations to account for follow‐up loss were performed. Results A total of 112 and 109 patients underwent SAC and BAC, respectively. Median cohort age was 56 years, and 72% were female. Baseline characteristics were similar. Hydrocephalus rate was higher in the SAC group (78% versus 64%; P=0.02). Median aneurysm size was 5.1 mm. Anterior circulation aneurysms were most common (81%). Aneurysm and neck size were different, more aneurysms measuring

Background Despite thrombectomy having become the standard of care for large‐vessel occlusion strokes, acute endovascular management in tandem occlusions, especially of the cervical internal carotid artery lesion, remains uncertain. We aimed to compare efficacy and safety of acute carotid artery stenting to balloon angioplasty alone on treating the cervical lesion in tandem occlusions. Similarly, we aimed to explore those outcomes’ associations with technique approaches and use of thrombolysis. Methods and Results We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to compare functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale), reperfusion, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and 3‐month mortality. We explored the association of first approach (anterograde/retrograde) and use of thrombolysis with those outcomes as well. Two independent reviewers performed the screening, data extraction, and quality assessment. A random‐effects model was used for analysis. Thirty‐four studies were included in our systematic review and 9 in the meta‐analysis. Acute carotid artery stenting was associated with higher odds of modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 (odds ratio [OR], 1.95 [95% CI, 1.24–3.05]) and successful reperfusion (OR, 1.89 [95% CI, 1.26–2.83]), with no differences in mortality or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rates. Moreover, a retrograde approach was significantly associated with modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 (OR, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.05–2.83]), and no differences were found on thrombolysis status. Conclusions Carotid artery stenting and a retrograde approach had higher odds of successful reperfusion and good functional outcomes at 3 months than balloon angioplasty and an anterograde approach, respectively, in patients with tandem occlusions. A randomized controlled trial comparing these techniques with structured antithrombotic regimens and safety outcomes will offer definitive guidance in the optimal management of this complex disease.

Introduction: Flow diversion has established itself as standard treatment of wide complex intracranial aneurysms (IA). Its recognition has been validated with positive occlusion rates and favorable clinical outcomes. The Surpass Streamline (SS) flow diverter (FD) is a braided cobalt/chromium alloy implant with 72 or 96 wires approved by the FDA in 2018. The aim of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of the SS in a post‐marketing large US cohort. Methods: We performed a multicenter, retrospective study for consecutive patients treated with the SS FD for IA between January 2018 and June 2021 in the United States. Inclusion criteria for participants were: 1. Adults (≥ 18 years) and 2. Treatment with SS FD for IA. Primary safety end point was a major ipsilateral stroke (increase in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score of ≥ 4) or neurological death within 12 months. Primary efficacy was assessed using the 3‐point Raymond‐Roy (RR) occlusion scale on digital subtraction angiography (DSA) at 6‐12‐month follow‐up. Results: A total of 276 patients with 313 aneurysms were enrolled. The median age was 59 years and 199 (72%) were females. The most common comorbidities included hypertension in 156 (57%) subjects followed by hyperlipidemia in 76 (28%) patients. One hundred and twenty‐two (44%) patients were asymptomatic while subarachnoid hemorrhage was present in only 10 (4%) patients. A total of 143 (46%) aneurysms were left‐sided. Aneurysms were located as follows: 274 (88%) were in the anterior circulation with paraophthalmic being the most common in 120 (38%) followed by petrocavernous ICA in 81 (26%); 33 (11%) aneurysms were located in the posterior circulation with basilar trunk being the most common in 14 (5%). The mean maximum aneurysm dome width was 5.77 ± 4.7 mm, neck width 4.22 ± 3.8 mm and dome to neck ratio was 1.63 ± 1.3 mm. The mean number of SS FD implanted per aneurysm was 1.06 (range 1–3) with more than one SS FD implanted in 21 (7%) aneurysms. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0–2 was present in 206/213 (97%) patients at 6–12 month follow‐up. The complete aneurysm occlusion (RR 1) rate was 145/175 (83%) among subjects who had angiographic follow‐up at 6–12 months. Major stroke and death was encountered in 7 (2%) and 5 (1.8%) of the patients respectively. Conclusions: Our data represent the largest real‐world study using SS FD. These results corroborate its post‐marketing safety and efficacy for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms showing more favorable rates to the initial experience during SCENT trial.

Introduction: Chronic internal carotid occlusion is responsible for 10–15% ischemic strokes or transit ischemic attacks (TIA). Subsequent ipsilateral ischemic stroke rate is 5.9% per year. However, this risk can increase up to 23% in two years in a subgroup of patients with poor collaterals regardless of medical therapy with antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents. Prevention of subsequent stroke in patients with carotid artery occlusion remains a difficult challenge. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has recently been considered in its management. However, there is ambiguity on its safety. We aim to evaluate the safety and feasibility of CAS and compared it with medical management. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to compare long‐term outcome (stroke recurrence) of current carotid occlusion treatments (CAS vs medical therapy). Two independent reviewers performed the screening, data extraction, and quality assessment. A random effects model was used for analysis. Results: A total of 5720 studies were screened. Of these, 11 studies were included in our systematic review and meta‐analysis of proportions. The CAS group has lower proportions of recurrent strokes (5% vs 30%,) after 30 days than medical therapy alone. Additionally, the proportion of periprocedural intracranial hemorrhage was 4.4% (95% CI 2.5 to 6.8) in the CAS group. Conclusions: CAS of the chronically occluded cervical ICA seems to be a safe procedure with lower rates of recurrent stroke in clinical follow up. Future randomized studies are warranted to guide the optimal management of this complex disease.