Search

Emily S Mills,1 Jacob A Becerra,1 Katie Yensen,1 Ioanna K Bolia,1 Edward C Shontz,1 Kareem J Kebaish,1 Andrew Dobitsch,1 Laith K Hasan,1 Aryan Haratian,1 Charlton D Ong,2 Jordan Gross,2 Frank A Petrigliano,1 Alexander E Weber1 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 2Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USACorrespondence: Ioanna K Bolia, USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, 1520 San Pablo st #2000, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA, Tel +1 9703432813, Fax +8181 658 5920, Email ioanna.bolia-kavouklis@med.usc.eduAbstract: Hip osteoarthritis (OA) can be idiopathic or develop secondary to structural joint abnormalities of the hip joint (alteration of normal anatomy) and/or due to a systemic condition with joint involvement. Early osteoarthritic changes to the hip can be completely asymptomatic or may cause the development hip symptomatology without evidence of OA on radiographs. Delaying the progression of hip OA is critical due to the significant impact of this condition on the patient’s quality of life. Pre-OA of the hip is a newly established term that is often described as the development of signs and symptoms of degenerative hip disease but no radiographic evidence of OA. Advanced imaging methods can help to diagnose pre-OA of the hip in patients with hip pain and normal radiographs or aid in the surveillance of asymptomatic patients with an underlying hip diagnosis that is known to increase the risk of early OA of the hip. These methods include the delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of cartilage (dGEMRIC), quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI- T1rho, T2, and T2* relaxation time mapping), 7-Tesla MRI, computed tomography (CT), and optical coherence tomography (OCT). dGEMRIC proved to be a reliable and accurate modality though it is limited by the significant time necessary for contrast washout between scans. This disadvantage is potentially overcome by T2 weighted MRIs, which do not require contrast. 7-Tesla MRI is a promising development for enhanced imaging resolution compared to 1.5 and 3T MRIs. This technique does require additional optimization and development prior to widespread clinical use. The purpose of this review was to summarize the results of translational and clinical studies investigating the utilization of the above-mentioned imaging modalities to diagnose hip pre-OA, with special focus on recent research evaluating their implementation into clinical practice.Keywords: hip, pre-osteoarthritis, dGEMRIC, 7T MRI, qMRI, OCT, delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage, optical coherence tomography, quantitative magnetic resonance imaging

Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis., Objective: To compare radiographic outcomes across lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) techniques, assessing segmental and global lumbar lordosis restoration., Summary of Background Data: LIF is a commonly utilized procedure to treat various spinal conditions, including degenerative pathology and adult spinal deformity. Common approaches include posterior LIF (PLIF), transforaminal LIF (TLIF), anterior LIF (ALIF), oblique LIF (OLIF), and lateral LIF (LLIF)., Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out using PRISMA guidelines with appropriate MeSH terms. Papers were included based on relevance, number of patients, and a minimum of 1-year radiographic follow-up. Radiographic outcomes included segmental lordosis (SL) and lumbar lordosis (LL). Only papers directly comparing SL restoration between two or more LIF techniques were utilized in the systematic review, while all articles meeting the aforementioned criteria were used in the meta-analysis., Results: Nineteen studies were included in the final systematic review, and 88 papers were included in the meta-analysis. Seven studies in the systematic review showed a significantly higher increase in SL with ALIF versus TLIF, and two showed significantly higher SL gain with ALIF compared with LLIF. When comparing ALIF versus OLIF, one study favored ALIF, while another favored OLIF for SL restoration. OLIF likewise demonstrated superior restoration of SL compared with TLIF. LLIF demonstrated improved SL restoration compared with TLIF in 2 of the 3 studies comparing the 2 procedures. Furthermore, both ALIF and OLIF demonstrated superior LL restoration compared with TLIF in 4 and 3 studies, respectively. The meta-analysis results demonstrated that ALIF provided significantly better restoration of SL than TLIF, LLIF, and OLIF, while TLIF conferred significantly lower SL restoration than ALIF and OLIF. Similarly, LL restoration was significantly reduced with TLIF relative to OLIF and LLIF (all P<0.05)., Conclusions: The included studies demonstrated superior SL and LL restoration with ALIF, OLIF, and LLIF compared with TLIF. ALIF improved SL to a greater extent when directly compared with all other interbody techniques., Competing Interests: J.C.W. has received intellectual property royalties from Zimmer Biomet, NovApproach, SeaSpine, and DePuy Synthes. R.J.H. has received grant funding from SI Bone, consulting fees from NuVasive, and support from the North American Spine Society to attend meetings. R.K.A. has received grant funding from NIH, consulting fees from HIA Technologies, and payment from Eccentrial Robotics for lectures and presentations​​​. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Retrospective cohort analysis., Objective: To characterize the impact of COVID-19 on utilization of the ten most common spine procedures and percentages of outpatient procedures., Methods: The PearlDiver national database was queried from January 2010 to April 2021 for short (<6 segments) and long segment posterior instrumented fusion (≥6 segments), posterior cervical fusion, anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF), cervical laminectomy, laminoplasty, and disc arthroplasty, lumbar laminectomy, microdiscectomy, and interbody fusion. Annual procedure utilization between January 2010 through April 2021 was recorded and compared. Monthly trends were compared to January 2020. Outpatient trends were compared between 2010-2019 and 2019-2021 using segmented linear regression., Results: Overall, all ten procedures decreased 4.3% in 2020 compared to 2019 and increased 6.3% in 2021 compared to 2019. March and April of 2020 had the largest decreases, with March 2020 decreasing 18.2% and April 2020 decreasing 51.6% compared to January 2020. Despite increasing COVID cases in January 2021, overall procedure utilization decreased only 1.8% compared to January 2020, and increased later in 2021 with April 2021 case volumes increasing by 138% compared to January 2020. Outpatient utilization of short segment posterior lumbar fusion and lumbar interbody fusion significantly increased during this time ( P < .001)., Conclusion: The greatest impact on spine surgery volume from the COVID-19 pandemic occurred in March and April 2020. Spine procedure utilization was otherwise similar or increased compared to January 2020. Additionally, the volume of outpatient short segment posterior fusion and lumbar interbody fusions increased during this time period., Competing Interests: DisclosuresThe author(s) declare the following disclosures with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Emily S. Mills, Kevin Mertz, Ethan Faye, and Andy Ton has nothing to disclose. Jeffrey C. Wang has received intellectual property royalties from Zimmer Biomet, NovApproach, SeaSpine, and DePuy Synthes. Raymond J. Hah M.D. has received grant funding from SI bone, consulting fees from NuVasive, and support from the North American Spine Society to attend meetings. Ram K. Alluri, M.D. discloses has received grant funding from NIH, consulting fees from HIA Technologies, and payment from Eccentrial Robotics for lectures and presentations. Institutional review board (IRB) approval and informed consent were not required as no patient information was involved in this study.

Study Design: Systematic Review., Objectives: While substantial research has explored the impact of osteoporosis on patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction, the literature remains inconclusive. As such, the purpose of this study is to synthesize and analyze existing studies pertaining to osteoporosis as a predictor of postoperative outcomes in ASD surgery., Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effect that a diagnosis of osteoporosis, based on ICD-10 coding, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) or computed tomography, has on the incidence of adverse outcomes following surgical correction of ASD. Statistical analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (Version 2) using a random effects model to account for heterogeneity between studies., Results: After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 36 and 28 articles were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, respectively. The meta-analysis identified greater rates of screw loosening amongst osteoporotic patients (70.5% vs 31.9%, P = .009), and decreased bone mineral density in patients who developed proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) (.69 vs .79 g/cm 2 , P = .001). The systematic review demonstrated significantly increased risk of any complication, reoperation, and proximal junctional failure (PJF) associated with reduced bone density. No statistical difference was observed between groups regarding fusion rates, readmission rates, and patient-reported and/or functional outcome scores., Conclusion: This study demonstrates a higher incidence of screw loosening, PJK, and revision surgery amongst osteoporotic ASD patients. Future investigations should explore outcomes at various follow-up intervals in order to better characterize how risk changes with time and to tailor preoperative planning based on patient-specific characteristics., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objective: The present study compares postoperative outcomes between patients with and without sickle cell disease (SCD) undergoing 1-to 3-level lumbar spinal fusion for degenerative pathologies., Methods: Patients who underwent 1-to 3-level lumbar spinal fusion for degenerative pathologies from 2010 to 2021 were identified using the PearlDiver database. Patients were separated into 1) SCD and 2) non-SCD groups and were propensity-matched 1:1 for age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, surgical approach, and various comorbidities. Complications were separately analyzed by single- and multilevel procedures using chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U testing., Results: Propensity-score matching identified 1934 SCD and non-SCD patients who underwent single-level fusion and 2094 SCD and non-SCD patients who underwent multilevel fusion. Across single-level fusions, those with SCD had a significantly higher risk of neurovascular compromise (P < 0.001), venous thromboembolism (P = 0.004), pneumonia (P = 0.032), urinary tract infections (P = 0.001), and greater postoperative opioid usage out to 12 months (P = 0.018). Across multilevel fusions, SCD carried higher risk for neurovascular compromise (P < 0.001), pneumonia (P = 0.010), and urinary tract infections (P < 0.001). All SCD patients had significantly higher opioid use at 1 month (P = 0.001) and at 6 months (P = 0.009) postoperatively., Conclusions: Patients with SCD undergoing lumbar spinal fusion demonstrate higher risks for coagulopathic, ischemic, and infectious-related complications, as well as long-term postoperative opioid use. Awareness of the unique complication profile in SCD patients may help guide surgeons in refining perioperative management strategies to optimize outcomes in patients with SCD., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The purpose of this cross-sectional, observational study was to establish the relationship between standing lumbar lordosis (LL) and lateral decubitus LL., Methods: Forty-nine subjects, 24 male and 25 female, were prospectively enrolled. Patients with pre-existing spinopelvic pathology were excluded. Standing, relaxed-seated, and lateral decubitus lateral radiographs were obtained. Radiographic variables measured included LL and lordosis change at each lumbar level (e.g. L1-L2). The change in LL when going from a standing to a lateral decubitus position (ΔLL), the correlation between standing and sitting LL compared to lateral decubitus LL, and the correlation between ΔLL and standing pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), PI-LL mismatch, pelvic femoral angle (PFA), and sacral slope (SS) were calculated., Results: Subjects had an average age of 25.7 ± 2.3 years and body mass index of 24.1 ± 3.0 kg/m 2 . On average, 11.9°±8.2° (range - 7° to 29°) of LL was lost when transitioning from a standing to the lateral decubitus position. Lateral decubitus LL had a higher correlation with standing LL (R = 0.725, p < 0.001) than with relaxed-seated LL (R = 0.434, p < 0.001). Standing PT and PI-LL mismatch had moderately negative correlations with ΔLL (R=-0.58 and R=-0.59, respectively, both p < 0.05). Standing PI and standing PFA had a low negative correlation with ΔLL (R=-0.31 and R=-0.44, respectively, both p < 0.05) Standing SS and LL had no correlation with ΔLL., Conclusions: Standing LL was strongly correlated to lateral decubitus LL, although subjects lost an average of 11.9° from the standing to the lateral decubitus position. This has important implications for fusion in the lateral position., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) pose a considerable healthcare burden and are linked to elevated morbidity and mortality. Despite available anti-osteoporotic treatments (AOTs), guideline adherence is lacking. This study aims to evaluate subsequent hip fracture incidence after index VCF and to elucidate AOT prescribing patterns in VCF patients, further assessing the impact of surgical interventions on these patterns. Materials and Methods: Patients with index VCFs between 2010 and 2021 were identified using the PearlDiver database. Diagnostic and procedural data were recorded using International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9, ICD-10) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Patients under age 50 and follow-up

Background: As the elderly population grows, the increasing prevalence of osteoporosis presents a unique challenge for surgeons. Decreased bone strength and quality are associated with hardware failure and impaired bone healing, which may increase the rate of revision surgery and the development of complications. The purpose of this review is to determine the impact of osteoporosis on postoperative outcomes for patients with cervical degenerative disease or deformity., Methods: A systematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and Medical Subject Headings terms involving spine surgery for cervical degenerative disease and osteoporosis were performed. This review focused on radiographic outcomes, as well as surgical and medical complications., Results: There were 16 studies included in the degenerative group and 9 in the deformity group. Across degenerative studies, lower bone mineral density was associated with increased rates of cage subsidence in osteoporotic patients undergoing operative treatment for cervical degenerative disease. Most studies reported varied results on the relationship between osteoporosis and other outcomes such as revision and readmission rates, costs, and perioperative complications. Our meta-analysis suggests that osteoporotic patients carry a greater risk of reduced fusion rates at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. With respect to cervical deformity correction, although individual complication rates were unchanged with osteoporosis, the collective risk of incurring any complication may be increased in patients with poor bone stock., Conclusions: Overall, the literature suggests that outcomes for osteoporotic patients after cervical spine surgery are multifactorial. Osteoporosis seems to be a significant risk factor for developing cage subsidence and pseudarthrosis postoperatively, whereas reports on medical and hospital-related metrics were inconclusive. Our findings highlight the challenges of caring for osteoporotic patients and underline the need for adequately powered studies to understand how osteoporosis changes the risk index of patients undergoing cervical spine surgery., Clinical Relevance: In patients undergoing cervical spine surgery for degenerative disease, osteoporosis is a significant risk factor for long-term postoperative complications-notably cage subsidence and pseudarthrosis. Given the elective nature of these procedures, interdisciplinary collaboration between providers should be routinely implemented to enable medical optimization of patients prior to cervical spine surgery., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting Interests : The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2024 ISASS. To see more or order reprints or permissions, see http://ijssurgery.com.)

Background: Lumbar spinal pathology is known to affect outcomes following total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the effect of hip osteoarthritis (OA) on outcomes following lumbar fusion has not been well studied. The purpose of this study was to determine the association between hip OA and spinal reoperation following lumbar spinal fusion., Methods: The 5% Medicare Part B claims database was queried for all patients who underwent primary elective lumbar fusion from 2005 to 2019. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those who underwent elective THA within 1 year after primary lumbar fusion, indicating that they had severe hip OA at the time of lumbar fusion, and those who underwent lumbar fusion with no diagnosed hip OA and no THA during the study period. Exclusion criteria included THA as a result of trauma, revision THA or primary THA in the 5-year period before primary lumbar fusion, <65 years of age, and no enrollment in the database for 5 years before and 1 year after primary lumbar fusion. The primary outcome was spinal reoperation within 1, 3, and 5 years. Multivariable Cox regression was performed with age, sex, diabetes, heart disease, obesity, smoking status, osteoporosis, number of levels fused, use of posterior instrumentation, use of an interbody device, use of bone graft, and surgical approach as covariates., Results: Overall, 1,123 patients (63.4% female; 91.3% White; mean age, 76.8 ± 4.1 years) were included in the hip OA group and 8,893 patients (56.2% female; 91.3% White; mean age, 74.8 ± 4.9 years) were included in the control group. After multivariable analysis, patients with severe hip OA had significantly greater rates of revision surgery at 3 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.61; p < 0.001) and 5 years (OR, 1.87; p < 0.001) after the index lumbar fusion., Conclusions: Patients with severe hip OA at the time of primary lumbar fusion had a significantly increased risk of spinal reoperation at 3 and 5 years postoperatively. These data provide further evidence to support performing THA prior to lumbar fusion in the unsettled debate regarding which surgery should be prioritized for patients with simultaneous degenerative diseases of the hip and lumbar spine., Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., Competing Interests: Disclosure: No external funding was received for this work. The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJS/I43)., (Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Background: There is considerable heterogeneity in findings and a lack of consensus regarding the interplay between osteoporosis and outcomes in patients with lumbar degenerative spine disease. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to gather and analyze existing data on the effect of osteoporosis on radiographic, surgical, and clinical outcomes following surgery for lumbar degenerative spinal disease., Methods: A systematic review was performed to determine the effect of osteoporosis on the incidence of adverse outcomes after surgical intervention for lumbar degenerative spinal diseases. The approach focused on the radiographic outcomes, reoperation rates, and other medical and surgical complications. Subsequently, a meta-analysis was performed on the eligible studies., Results: The results of the meta-analysis suggested that osteoporotic patients experienced increased rates of adjacent segment disease (ASD; p=0.015) and cage subsidence (p=0.001) while demonstrating lower reoperation rates than non-osteoporotic patients (7.4% vs. 13.1%; p=0.038). The systematic review also indicated that the length of stay, overall costs, rates of screw loosening, and rates of wound and other medical complications may increase in patients with a lower bone mineral density. Fusion rates, as well as patient-reported and clinical outcomes, did not differ significantly between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic patients., Conclusions: Osteoporosis was associated with an increased risk of ASD, cage migration, and possibly postoperative screw loosening, as well as longer hospital stays, incurring higher costs and an increased likelihood of postoperative complications. However, a link was not established between osteoporosis and poor clinical outcomes.

Study Design: Retrospective Cohort Study., Objectives: Cervical radiculopathy and peripheral entrapment neuropathies often have overlapping symptoms that are difficult to distinguish on physical examination. Small-scale studies have attempted to report the incidence of this phenomenon, often called double crush syndrome (DCS), with varying results. The present study aims to determine the incidence of concomitant cervical radiculopathy and peripheral nerve compression and to determine if the DCS hypothesis, which states that compression of a nerve at one site leaves it more susceptible to compression at another, is valid., Methods: The PearlDiver database was queried from 2010 to 2020. The incidence of peripheral neuropathy in cervical radiculopathy was assessed. Propensity score matching was used to determine if patients with cervical radiculopathy were more likely to have peripheral nerve compression compared to controls, and vice versa, to test the DCS hypothesis., Results: The database contains records of 90,772 632 patients. The incidence of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) or peripheral ulnar nerve compression (PUnC) in cervical radiculopathy was 9.98% and 3.15%, respectively. The incidence of both carpal tunnel syndrome and PUnC in cervical radiculopathy was 1.84%. Patients with cervical radiculopathy were more likely than matched controls to have both CTS ( P < .001) and PUnC ( P < .001). Patients with CTS ( P < .001) and with PUnC ( P < .001) were more likely to have cervical radiculopathy than the control cohort., Conclusions: The incidence of DCS is reported. Patients with cervical radiculopathy are more likely than matched controls to have peripheral nerve compression, and vice versa, in support of the DCS hypothesis.

Background: This review outlines clinical data and characteristics of current Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved implants in cervical disc replacement/cervical disc arthroplasty (CDR/CDA) to provide a centralized resource for spine surgeons., Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on CDR/CDA were identified using a search of the PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. The initial search identified 69 studies. Duplicates were removed, and the following inclusion criteria were applied when determining eligibility of RCTs for the current review: (1) discussing CDR/CDA prosthesis and (2) published within between 2010 and 2020. Studies without clinical data or that were not RCTs were excluded. All articles were reviewed independently by 2 authors, with the involvement of an arbitrator to facilitate consensus on any discrepancies., Results: A total of 34 studies were included in the final review. Findings were synthesized into a comprehensive table describing key features and clinical results for each FDA-approved CDR/CDA implant and are overall suggestive of expanding indications and increasing utilization., Conclusions: RCTs have provided substantial evidence to support CDR/CDA for treating single- and 2-level cervical degenerative disc disease in place of conventional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion., Clinical Relevance: This review provides a resource that consolidates relevant clinical data for current FDA-approved implants to help spine surgeons make an informed decision during preoperative planning., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting Interests : No funding was received for this study. Djani Robertson, Andy Ton, Michael Brown, Shane Shahrestani, and Emily S. Mills have nothing to disclose. Jeffrey C. Wang has received intellectual property royalties from Zimmer Biomet, NovApproach, SeaSpine, and DePuy Synthes. Raymond J. Hah has received grant funding from SI bone, consulting fees from NuVasive, and support from the North American Spine Society to attend meetings. Ram K. Alluri has received grant funding from NIH, consulting fees from HIA Technologies, and payment from Eccentrial Robotics for lectures and presentations., (This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2024 ISASS. To see more or order reprints or permissions, see http://ijssurgery.com.)

Background: Previously reported estimates of vertebral artery injuries (VAIs) during cervical spine surgery relied on self-reported survey studies and retrospective cohorts, which may not be reflective of national averages. The largest study to date reports an incidence of 0.07%; however, significant variation exists between different cervical spine procedures. This study aimed to identify the incidence of VAIs in patients undergoing cervical spine procedures for degenerative pathologies., Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, a national insurance database was used to access data from the period 2010-2020 of patients who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, anterior corpectomy, posterior cervical fusion (C3-C7), or C1-C2 posterior fusion for degenerative pathologies. Patients who experienced a VAI were identified, and frequencies for the different procedures were compared., Results: This study included 224,326 patients, and overall incidence of VAIs across all procedures was 0.03%. The highest incidence of VAIs was estimated in C1-C2 posterior fusion (0.12%-1.10%). The number of patients with VAIs after anterior corpectomy, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, and posterior fusion was 14 (0.06%), 43 (0.02%), and 26 (0.01%), respectively., Conclusions: This is the largest study to date to our knowledge that provides frequencies of VAIs in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery in the United States. The overall incidence of 0.03% is lower than previously reported estimates, but significant variability exists between procedures, which is an important consideration when counseling patients about risks of surgery., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study., Objective: The purpose of this study was to characterize the infection risk of preoperative epidural steroid injection (ESI) in patients undergoing posterior cervical surgery., Summary of Background Data: ESI is a helpful tool for alleviating pain and is often used as a diagnostic tool before cervical surgery. However, a recent small-scale study found that ESI before cervical fusion was associated with an increased risk of postoperative infection., Materials and Methods: Patients from 2010 to 2020 with cervical myelopathy, spondylosis, and radiculopathy who underwent posterior cervical procedure including laminectomy, laminoforaminotomy, fusion, or laminoplasty were queried from the PearlDiver database. Patients who underwent revision or fusion above C2 or who had a diagnosis of neoplasm, trauma, or preexisting infection were excluded. Patients were divided on whether they received an ESI within 30 days before the procedure and subsequently matched by age, sex, and preoperative comorbidities. The χ 2 analysis was used to calculate the risk of postoperative infection within 90 days. Logistic regression controlling for age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, and operated levels was conducted within the unmatched population to assess infection risk for injected patients across procedure subgroups., Results: Overall, 299,417 patients were identified with 3897 having received a preoperative ESI and 295,520 who did not. Matching resulted in 975 in the injected group and 1929 in the control group. There was no significant difference in postoperative infection rate in those who received an ESI within 30 days preoperatively and those who did not (3.28% vs. 3.78%, odds ratio=0.86, 95% CI: 0.57-1.32, P =0.494). Logistic regression accounting for age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, and levels operated demonstrated that injection did not significantly increase infection risk in any of the procedure subgroups., Conclusions: The present study found no association between preoperative ESI within 30 days before surgery and postoperative infection in patients undergoing posterior cervical surgery., Competing Interests: R.J.H. has received grant funding from SI bone, consulting fees from NuVasive, and support from the North American Spine Society to attend meetings. R.K.A. has received grant funding from NIH, consulting fees from HIA Technologies, and payment from Eccentrial Robotics for lectures and presentations. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Retrospective National Database Study., Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the national trend of lumbar disc arthroplasty (LDA) utilization from 2005 to 2017., Methods: Patients undergoing primary LDA between 2005 and 2017 were identified in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Year of the procedure, demographic, socioeconomic, hospital, and cost parameters were analyzed. The data was weighted using provided weights from the NIS database to generate national estimates of LDA procedure incidence. Lastly, we assessed the incidence of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) between 2005 and 2017 to serve as a historical comparison., Results: An estimated 20 460 patients underwent primary LDA in the United States between 2005 and 2017. There was an initial decrease in LDA procedures between 2005 and 2006 and then a plateau between 2006 and 2009. From 2010 to 2013, there was a significant year-over-year decrease in annual LDA procedures performed, followed by a second plateau from 2014 to 2017. Overall, LDA procedures decreased 82% from 2005 to 2017. Over the same time, the annual incidence of CDA utilization increased 795% from approximately 474 procedures in 2005 to 4245 procedures in 2017 ( P < .01)., Conclusions: Lumbar disc arthroplasty utilization decreased 82% from 2005 to 2017, with a significant decrease in the rate of utilization noted after 2010. The utilization of LDA to treat selected degenerative lumbar conditions has not paralleled the increasing popularity of CDA, and, in fact, has demonstrated a nearly opposite utilization trend.

Postoperative spinopelvic changes are associated with increased dislocation risk following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to identify preoperative patient and radiographic factors associated with high-risk postoperative spinopelvic parameters. A retrospective review of consecutive THA patients who received preoperative and postoperative sitting and standing lateral lumbar spine-hip radiographs with minimum radiographic and clinical follow-up of 10 months was performed. Patient demographics were recorded and preoperative standing and sitting sacral slope (SS), anteinclination, pelvic femoral angle (PFA), and combined sagittal index (CSI) were measured. High-risk patients were defined by decreased spinopelvic motion (∆SS from sitting to standing of >10°), increased hip motion (∆PFA from sitting to standing of >10°), or decreased CSI of >10° at final follow-up compared with preoperative measurements. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify preoperative demographic and radiographic factors associated with these high-risk categories. One hundred and fifty-three patients were included with an average age of 62 years, average body mass index of 27.8 kg/m 2 , and average follow-up of 16.2 months. At 1-year follow-up, 43 (28.1%) patients demonstrated a decreased ∆SS > 10° and 67 (43.7%) patients demonstrated an increased ∆PFA > 10° compared with preoperative values. Sitting CSI decreased by >10° in 17 (11.1%) patients. Preoperative increased sitting PFA (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.057, p < 0.001) and decreased preoperative hip motion (∆PFA) were associated with decreased sitting CSI of >10° at 10-month follow-up. Increased spinopelvic motion (∆SS) and decreased hip motion (∆PFA) preoperatively are associated with postoperative radiographic changes that be associated with increased dislocation risk., (© 2023 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Study Design: Narrative review., Objectives: The purpose of this review is to outline the role of sex hormones, particularly estrogen, in the pathogenesis of degenerative disc disease (DDD)., Methods: A narrative review of studies discussing sex hormones and intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration was conducted through a search of bibliographic databases to identify various mechanisms involved in effectuating DDD., Results: Estrogen-deficient states negatively impact various aspects of IVD function. These internal hormone environments reflect routine changes that commonly arise with physiologic aging and can compromise IVD structural integrity through a host of processes. Additionally, allosteric molecules such as micro-RNAs (mi-RNAs) and G protein-coupled estrogen receptors (GPER) antagonists can bind to estrogen receptors and inhibit protective downstream effects with estrogen receptor signaling. Furthermore, cursory studies have observed chondrogenic effects with testosterone supplementation, although the specific mechanism remains unclear., Conclusions: Regulation of sex hormones, namely estrogen and testosterone, significantly impacts the structural integrity and function of IVDs. Uncovering underlying interactions driving these regulatory processes can facilitate development of novel, clinical therapies to treat DDD.

Study Design/setting: Retrospective cohort analysis., Objectives: This study evaluates utilization and demographic trends for sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusions across the United States (US)., Methods: Patients who underwent SIJ fusion from 2010-2021 were identified within the PearlDiver national database using International Classification of Disease (ICD-9, ICD-10) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Indications for trauma, malignancy, or infection were excluded. Demographic, clinical, and procedure characteristics were recorded along with annual utilization rates. Annual percent change (APC) was calculated to identify increasing or decreasing utilization from prior years. Negative binomial regression was performed to project subsequent utilization for 2022-2028. Chi-squared analysis followed by post-hoc comparisons were used to compare differences in diagnostic indications and clinical features associated with SIJ fusion across regions. Bonferroni adjustments were applied to P -values for pairwise analyses., Results: Overall, 18 032 patients (69.8% female, mean age = 51.0 + 13.4 years) underwent SIJ fusion between 2010 and 2021. Annual utilization increased by 33.5% on average. The South comprised the largest proportion of cases (48.9%). Projections for 2022-2028 predict continued growth in procedures, with an overall increase of 1100% from 1350 cases in 2021 to 16 195 by end of 2028. Spondyloarthropathy-induced sacroilitis was the most prevalent diagnostic indication nationwide (51%). Of patients undergoing SIJ fusion, 18% had a prior lumbar fusion, and only 45% received a preoperative diagnostic SIJ injection., Conclusion: As SIJ fusion is increasingly utilized to treat refractory SIJ-based pain, establishing evidence-based guidelines, improving diagnostic strategies, and defining indications are imperative to support growing applications within clinical practice., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: An optimal venous thromboembolism prophylaxis agent should balance efficacy and safety. While rivaroxaban provides effective venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after total joint arthroplasty, it may be associated with higher rates of bleeding. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban to aspirin and enoxaparin., Methods: A large national database was queried for patients who underwent elective primary total hip (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from January 2015 through December 2020 who received rivaroxaban, aspirin, or enoxaparin. Multivariate analyses were performed to assess the 90-day risk of bleeding and thromboembolic complications. Among TKA patients identified, 86,721 (10.8%) received rivaroxaban, 408,038 (50.8%) received aspirin, and 108,377 (13.5%) received enoxaparin. Among THA patients, 42,469 (9.5%) received rivaroxaban, 242,876 (54.5%) received aspirin, and 59,727 (13.4%) received enoxaparin., Results: After accounting for confounding factors, rivaroxaban was associated with increased risk of transfusion (TKA: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.58, P < .001; THA: aOR 1.64, P < .001), pulmonary embolism (TKA: aOR = 1.25, P = .007), and deep vein thrombosis (TKA: aOR = 1.13, P = .022) compared to aspirin. Compared to enoxaparin, rivaroxaban was associated with an increased risk of combined bleeding events (TKA: aOR = 1.07, P < .001, THA: aOR = 1.11, P < .001), but decreased risk of combined prothrombotic events (THA: aOR = 0.85, P = .036)., Conclusion: Rivaroxaban chemoprophylaxis following TKA and THA was associated with an increased risk of bleeding and prothrombotic complications compared to aspirin and enoxaparin., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Prednisone use is associated with higher rates of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). However, the relationship between prednisone dosage and infection risk is ill-defined. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the relationship between prednisone dosage and rates of PJI following TJA., Methods: A national database was queried for all elective total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients between 2015 and 2020. Patients who received oral prednisone following TJA were matched in a 1:2 ratio based on age and sex to patients who did not. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to assess the 90-day risk of infectious complications based on prednisone dosage as follows: 0 to 5, 6 to 10, 11 to 20, 21 to 30, and >30 milligrams. Overall, 1,322,043 patients underwent elective TJA (35.9% THA, 64.1% TKA). Of these, 14,585 (1.1%) received prednisone and were matched to 29,170 patients who did not., Results: After controlling for confounders, TKA patients taking prednisone were at increased risk for sepsis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.76, P < .001), PJI (aOR 2.67, P < .001), and surgical site infection (aOR: 2.56, P = .035). THA patients taking prednisone were at increased risk for sepsis (aOR: 3.21, P < .001) and PJI (aOR: 1.73, P = .001). No dose-dependent relationship between prednisone and infectious complications was identified when TJA was assessed in aggregate., Conclusion: Patients receiving prednisone following TJA were at increased risk of PJI and sepsis. A dose-dependent relationship between prednisone and infectious complications was not identified. Arthroplasty surgeons should be aware of these risks and counsel TJA patients who receive prednisone therapy., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The objective of this study is to assess differences in complication profiles between 3-level posterior column osteotomy (PCO) and single-level pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) as both are reported to provide similar degrees of sagittal correction., Methods: The PearlDiver database was queried retrospectively using International Classification of Disease, 9th and 10th edition and Current Procedural Terminology codes to identify patients who underwent PCO or PSO for degenerative spine disease. Patients under age 18 or with history of spinal malignancy, infection, or trauma were excluded. Patients were separated into 2 cohorts, 3-level PCO or single-level PSO, matched at a 1:1 ratio based on age, sex, Elixhauser comorbidity index, and number of fused posterior segments. Thirtyday systemic and procedure-related complications were compared., Results: Matching resulted in 631 patients for each cohort. PCO patients had decreased odds of respiratory (odds ratio [OR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-0.82; p = 0.001) and renal complications (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.40-0.88; p = 0.009) compared to PSO patients. There was no significant difference in cardiac complications, sepsis, pressure ulcer, dural tear, delirium, neurologic injuries, postoperative hematoma, postoperative anemia, or overall complications., Conclusion: Patients who undergo 3-level PCO have decreased respiratory and renal complications compared to single-level PSO. No differences were found in the other complications studied. Considering both procedures achieve similar sagittal correction, surgeons should be aware that 3-level PCO offers an improved safety profile compared to single-level PSO.

It has been well documented in the arthroplasty literature that lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) contributes to abnormal spinopelvic motion. However, the relationship between the severity or pattern of hip osteoarthritis (OA) as measured on an anteroposterior (AP) pelvic view and spinopelvic biomechanics has not been well investigated. Therefore, the aim of the study is to examine the association between the severity and pattern of hip OA and spinopelvic motion. A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Plain AP pelvic radiographs were reviewed to document the morphological characteristic of osteoarthritic hips. Lateral spine-pelvis-hip sitting and standing plain radiographs were used to measure sacral slope (SS) and pelvic femoral angle (PFA) in each position. Lumbar disc spaces were measured to determine the presence of DDD. The difference between sitting and standing SS and PFA were calculated to quantify spinopelvic motion (ΔSS) and hip motion (ΔPFA), respectively. Univariate analysis and Pearson correlation were used to identify morphological hip characteristics associated with changes in spinopelvic motion. In total, 139 patients were included. Increased spinopelvic motion was observed in patients with loss of femoral head contour, cam deformity, and acetabular bone loss (all p < 0.05). Loss of hip motion was observed in patients with loss of femoral head contour, cam deformity, and acetabular bone loss (all p < 0.001). A decreased joint space was associated with a decreased ΔPFA (p = 0.040). The presence of disc space narrowing, disc space narrowing > two levels, and disc narrowing involving the L5-S1 segment were associated with decreased spinopelvic motion (all p < 0.05). Preoperative hip OA as assessed on an AP pelvic radiograph predicts spinopelvic motion. These data suggest that specific hip osteoarthritic morphological characteristics listed above alter spinopelvic motion to a greater extent than others., Competing Interests: None declared., (© 2023 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.)

Background: The purpose of this review is to provide a brief history of previous attempts at developing patient screening tools and to further examine the definitions of these psychological concepts, relevance to clinical outcomes, and implications for spine surgeons during preoperative patient assessments., Methods: A literature review was performed by 2 independent researchers to identify original manuscripts related to spine surgery and novel psychological concepts. The history of presurgical psychology screening was also studied, and definitions of frequently utilized metrics were detailed., Results: Seven manuscripts were identified that utilized psychological metrics for preoperative risk assessments and correlated outcomes with these scores. The metrics most frequently used in the literature included resilience, patient activation, grit, and self-efficacy., Discussion: Current literature favors resilience and patient activation as important metrics for preoperative patient screening. Available studies demonstrate significant associations between these character traits and patient outcomes. Further research is warranted to investigate the roles of preoperative psychological screening to optimize patient selection in spine surgery., Clinical Relevance: The purpose of this review is to provide clinicians with a reference for available psychosocial screening tools and their relevance to patient selection. This review also serves to guide future research directions given the importance of this topic., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting Interests : Jeffrey Wang reports payment for expert testimony from law firms; a leadership role and expense reimbursement from the AO Foundation Board; stock/stock options from Bone Biologics, Pearldiver, and Electrocore; and fellowship funding from AO Spine North America (paid to institution). The remaining authors have nothing to disclose., (This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2023 ISASS. To see more or order reprints or permissions, see http://ijssurgery.com.)

Background: Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) was originally approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2007 as a motion-sparing procedure to treat cervical degenerative disc disease. Since then, promising results from randomized control trials have led to increasing popularity. However, data discussing monetary trends are limited. The aim of this study was to determine how utilization, hospital charges, and Medicare physician reimbursement for CDA have changed over time., Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, International Classification of Diseases procedure codes were used to identify all patients who underwent CDA from 2007 to 2017 in the National Inpatient Sample database. The Physician Fee Schedule Look-up Tool from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services was queried for primary CDA using current procedural terminology codes to determine Medicare physician reimbursement from 2009 to 2021. Nominal monetary values were adjusted for inflation using the Consumer Price Index and inflation-adjusted data reported in 2021 US dollars., Results: A total of 33,079 weighted patients who underwent CDA were included for analysis. CDA utilization increased by 183% from 2007 to 2017, with Medicare beneficiary utilization increasing 149%. Inflation-adjusted total hospital charges for CDA increased by 22.4%. However, inflation-adjusted Medicare physician reimbursement fell by 1.20% per year, demonstrating a total decrease of 12.9%, starting at $1928 in 2009 and declining to $1679 in 2021., Conclusions: While utilization and total hospital charges for CDA continue to rise, Medicare physician reimbursement has not shown the same trend. In fact, inflation-adjusted reimbursement has seen a steady decline since FDA approval in 2007. If this trend persists, it may become unsustainable for physicians to continue offering CDA to Medicare patients. As disproportionate increases in hospital charges incentivize a transition to outpatient CDA, stricter patient selection criteria associated with outpatient procedures may create health care disparities for Medicare patients and those with higher comorbidity burden., Clinical Relevance: This study shows the decreasing reimbursement trends for CDA, which may disproportionately affect Medicare patients and those with increased comorbidities., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting Interests : There are no direct conflicts of interest in this study. Emily S. Mills, Cory K. Mayfield, Tara Shelby, and Andy T. Ton have no conflicts to declare. Raymond J. Hah is a paid consultant for Nuvasive. He is on the editorial boards for Global Spine Journal, Clinical Spine Surgery, and The Spine Journal. Ram K. Alluri is a paid consultant and receives royalties from HIA Technologies Incorporated., (This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2023 ISASS. To see more or order reprints or permissions, see http://ijssurgery.com.)

Background: Arthroplasty surgeons use the change in sacral slope (ΔSS) from sitting to standing as a measure of spinal motion. The relationship between ΔSS and the change in lumbar lordosis (ΔLL), an established spinal motion measure, has not been well studied. This study aims to determine the correlation between ΔSS and ΔLL., Methods: Consecutive patients presenting to a spine clinic from 2020 to 2021 at a single institution were retrospectively studied. Standing and sitting lateral radiographs were measured for SS and LL. Patients were divided using ΔSS and ΔLL into stiff (0°-9°), normal (10°-30°), or hypermobile (>30°) category. Patients with a ΔSS-determined normal or hypermobile spine but a ΔLL-determined stiff spine were compared to the rest of the cohort., Results: Overall, 100 patients were included. Of these patients, 47% had the same classification when looking at ΔSS and ΔLL, whereas 53% had conflicting classifications. Twenty percent of patients had a ΔSS-determined normal or hypermobile spine but ΔLL-determined stiff spine. The correlation between ΔSS and ΔLL was 0.510 ( P < .001). When isolating patients who underwent lumbar fusion, the correlation between ΔSS and ΔLL was 0.345 ( P < .001)., Conclusions: ΔSS has a moderate correlation with ΔLL in patients presenting for evaluation of their lumbar spine but low correlation in patients with lumbar fusion. In our cohort, 20% of patients had a ΔSS-determined normal or hypermobile spine but a ΔLL-determined stiff spine, representing a potential high-risk dislocation cohort not captured by ΔSS alone. Arthroplasty surgeons should revisit classifying spinal motion based solely on ΔSS., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Background: Intraoperative dexamethasone can reduce postoperative pain and nausea following total knee (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). To the best of our knowledge, no study to date has been adequately powered to detect the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) from early dexamethasone exposure. This study aimed to assess PJI rates and complications in patients undergoing primary elective TKA and THA who received intraoperative dexamethasone., Methods: A national database was used to identify adults undergoing primary elective TKA and THA between 2015 and 2020. Patients who received intraoperative dexamethasone and those who did not were identified. The primary endpoint was 90-day risk of infectious complications. Secondary end points included thromboembolic, pulmonary, renal, and wound complications. Multivariate analyses were performed to assess the risk of all endpoints between cohorts. Between 2015 and 2020, 1,322,025 patients underwent primary elective TJA, of which 857,496 (64.1%) underwent TKA and 474,707 (35.9%) underwent TKA., Results: In patients who underwent TKA, dexamethasone was associated with lower risk of PJI (adjusted odds ratio: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.82-0.93, P < .001) as well as other secondary endpoints such as pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, and acute kidney injury. In patients who underwent THA, dexamethasone was associated with a lower risk of PJI (adjusted odds ratio: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.73-0.86, P < .001) as well as other secondary endpoints such as pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, acute kidney injury, and pneumonia., Conclusion: Intraoperative dexamethasone was not associated with increased risk of infectious complications. The data presented here provide evidence in support of intraoperative dexamethasone utilization during primary TKA or THA., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Painful vertebral osteoporotic compression fractures (OCFs) are often treated with cement augmentation, although controversies exist as to whether or not this increases the secondary fracture risk. Prevention of secondary fracture includes treatment of underlying osteoporosis. The purposes of this study were to determine (1) whether cement augmentation increases the rate of secondary fracture compared with nonoperative management, (2) whether anti-osteoporotic medications reduce the rate of secondary fracture, and (3) the rate of osteoporosis treatment with medications following vertebral OCF., Methods: The PearlDiver database was queried for all patients with a diagnosis of OCF from 2015 to 2019. Patients were excluded if they were <50 years old, had a diagnosis of spinal neoplasm or infection, or underwent lumbar fusion in the perioperative period. Secondary fracture risk was assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, with kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty, anti-osteoporotic medications, age, gender, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index as variables., Results: A total of 36,145 patients were diagnosed with an OCF during the study period. Of those, 25,904 (71.7%) underwent nonoperative management and 10,241 (28.3%) underwent cement augmentation, including 1,556 who underwent vertebroplasty and 8,833 who underwent kyphoplasty. Patients who underwent nonoperative management had a secondary fracture rate of 21.8% following the initial OCF, compared with 14.5% in the vertebroplasty cohort and 18.5% in the kyphoplasty cohort, which was not a significant difference on multivariate analysis. In the entire cohort, 2,833 (7.8%) received anti-osteoporotic medications and 33,312 (92.2%) did not. The rate of secondary fracture was 10.1% in patients who received medications and 21.9% in those who did not, which was a significant difference on multivariate analysis (odds ratio = 1.23, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Cement augmentation did not alter the rate of secondary fracture, whereas anti-osteoporotic medications significantly decreased the risk of subsequent OCF by 19%. Only 7.8% of patients received a prescription for an anti-osteoporotic medication following the initial OCF., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article ( http://links.lww.com/JBJS/H267 )., (Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Study Design: Retrospective national database study design., Purpose: This study was designed to determine whether acute percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) alters morbidity compared with nonoperative management., Overview of Literature: Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OCFs) are common and represent a large economic and patient burden. Several recent studies have focused on whether PVA offers benefits compared with nonoperative treatment., Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2015 to 2018. Patients with nonelective admissions for OCFs were identified using International Classification of Diseases (10th edition) codes. The exclusion criteria included age of less than 50 years, fusion and decompression procedures, and the presence of neoplasms and infections. Propensity score matching was implemented to construct 2:1 matched cohorts with similar comorbidities at admission. The patients were divided into the operative and nonoperative treatment groups. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to compare differences in in-hospital complication rates between the groups. All p-values of less than 0.05 were considered significant., Results: We identified 14,850 patients in the operative group and 29,700 patients in the nonoperative group. In the multivariate analysis, operative treatment was associated with significantly lower rates of pneumonia (odds ratio [OR], 0.75; p<0.001), acute respiratory failure (OR, 0.84; p=0.009), myocardial infarction (OR, 0.20; p<0.001), acute heart failure (OR, 0.80; p=0.001), cardiogenic shock (OR, 0.23; p=0.001), sepsis (OR, 0.39; p<0.001), septic shock (OR 0.50; p<0.001), and pressure ulcerations (OR, 0.71; p<0.001). However, operative treatment was associated with a significantly greater risk of acute renal failure (OR, 1.19; p<0.001) than nonoperative treatment., Conclusions: Patients who undergo acute PVA for OCFs have lower rates of respiratory complications, cardiac complications, sepsis, and pressure ulcerations while having a higher risk of acute renal failure.

Background Context: Recently, a single position lumbar fusion has been described in which both the anterior or lateral interbody fusion as well as posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation are performed in a single position., Purpose: The purpose of this study was to present and analyze the current evidence for single position lumbar fusion., Study Design/setting: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis., Patient Sample: Prospective or retrospective studies published in English that assessed outcomes of single position lumbar fusion surgery for patients with lumbar degenerative disease, spondylolisthesis, or radiculopathy were included., Outcome Measures: Outcome measures included operative time, estimated blood loss, hospital length of stay, X-Ray exposure time, and postoperative outcomes including leg numbness or pain, leg weakness, lumbar lordosis, and segmental lordosis., Methods: This systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Two separate meta-analyses were performed. The first compared single position (SP) surgery, both lateral and prone, to dual position or flipped (F) surgery. The second meta-analysis compared lateral single position (LSP) surgery to prone single position (PSP) surgery. Variables were included if (1) they were a mean with a reported standard deviation or (2) if they were a categorical variable. For calculating standard error of the mean, we used sample size, mean, and standard deviation. A random effects model was used. The heterogeneity among studies was assessed with a significance level of <0.05., Results: Twenty-one articles were included for analysis. Three studies were prospective nonrandomized studies, while 18 were retrospective. Seven articles studied lateral single position only, 10 articles compared lateral single position to traditional repositioning surgery, three articles studied prone single position surgery, and one article compared prone single position surgery to traditional repositioning surgery. A detailed review is provided for all 21 articles. Seventeen studies were included for meta-analysis comparing the SP versus F groups, for a total of 942 patients in the SP group and 254 in the F group. Mean operative time was significantly less for the SP group compared with the F group (SP: 127.5±7.9, F: 188.7±15.5, p<.001). Average hospital length of stay was 2.87±0.3 days in the SP group and 6.63±0.6 days in the F group (p<.001). Complication rates did not significantly differ between groups. Pedicle screws placed in the lateral position had a higher rate of complication as compared with those placed in a prone position (L: 10.2±2%, P: 1.6±1%, p=.015). Seventeen studies were included in the LSP versus PSP analysis, including 13 in the LSP group and four in the PSP group, with a total of 785 patients in the LSP group and 85 patients in the PSP group. Operative time and X-Ray exposure was significantly less in the LSP compared with the PSP group (117.1±5.5 minutes vs. 166.9±21.9 minutes, p<.001; 43.7±15.5 minutes vs. 171.0±25.8 minutes, p<.001). Postoperative segmental lordosis was greater in the prone single position group (p<.001)., Conclusions: Single position surgery decreases operative times and hospital length of stay, while maintaining similar complication rates and radiographic outcomes. PSP surgery was found to be longer in duration and have increased radiation exposure time compared with LSP, while increasing postoperative segmental lordosis., Competing Interests: Declarations of competing interests We have no relevant conflicts of interest. Emily S. Mills, Joshua Treloar, Olumuyiwa Idowu, and Tara Shelby have no conflicts to declare. Ram K. Alluri is a paid consultant and receives royalties from HIA Technologies Incorporated. Raymond J. Hah is a paid consultant for Nuvasive. He is on the editorial boards for Global Spine Journal, Clinical Spine Surgery, and The Spine Journal., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: This is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion (LSF) within the PearlDiver Humana research database from 2010 to 2018., Objective: The aim of this study was to determine if timing of total hip arthroplasty (THA) affects LSF outcomes., Summary of Background Data: In patients with both spine and hip pathology, outcomes of THA have been shown to be affected by the timing of THA relative to LSF. However, few studies have assessed postoperative outcomes following LSF in this clinical scenario., Materials and Methods: A national database was queried for patients undergoing lumbar fusion and divided into 4 groups: (1) those who underwent LSF without THA (No THA); (2) those who underwent THA at least 2 years before LSF (>2 Prior THA); (3) those who underwent THA in the 2 years before LSF (0-2 Prior THA); and (4) those who underwent THA after LSF (THA After). We assessed lumbar-specific outcomes, including pseudarthrosis, revision, mechanical failure, and adjacent segment disease (ASD); as well as systemic complications. Controlling for age, sex, and Charlson comorbidity index, complication rates between all groups were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Post hoc comparisons were performed using the Fisher exact test with Bonferroni correction to account for multiple pairwise comparisons, resulting in an adjusted threshold for statistical significance of P<0.007., Results: When compared with the no THA group, those in the THA After group had a higher rate of ASD on multivariate analysis [adjusted odds ratio: 1.53, 95% confidence interval: 1.20-1.94, P<0.001]. When compared with all patients who underwent THA before LSF, patients who underwent THA after LSF had an increased risk of ASD (adjusted odds ratio: 3.80, 95% confidence interval: 2.21-6.98, P<0.001)., Conclusions: Patients who undergo THA after LSF have an increased rate of lumbar-related complications both when compared with patients who do not undergo THA and when compared with patients who undergo THA before LSF., Competing Interests: J.C.W. receives royalties for Biomet, Seaspine, and Synthes; he has investments/options in Bone Biologics, Pearldiver, Electrocore, and Surgitech; he serves on the board of directors for the AO Foundation, Society for Brain Mapping and Therapeutics, and American Orthopaedic Association; he serves on the editorial board for Spine, The Spine Journal, Clinical Spine Surgery, and Global Spine Journal; he receives fellowship funding (paid to institution) from the AO Foundation. N.D.H. is a paid consultant for MicroPort Orthopedics and Intellijoint Surgical and has stock options in Intellijoint Surgical; he serves as a board member for the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. R.J.H. is a paid consultant for Nuvasive; he serves on the editorial board for The Spine Journal, Clinical Spine Surgery, and Global Spine Journal. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Chronic distal biceps tendon ruptures present a unique surgical challenge due to tendon retraction and shortening as well as muscle atrophy. Several graft choices and fixation methods have been described, with no one technique proving superior to date. We describe a technique wherein a tibialis anterior tendon allograft is Pulver-Taft weaved through the muscle belly to achieve incorporation with the muscle and tendonous fascia to achieve superior pull-out strength., (© 2021 by the Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier.)

Questioning the routine use of postoperative laboratory tests is a strategy to combat rising health care costs. The goal of this study was to determine the utility and cost of routine postoperative complete blood count (CBC) testing after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the era of tranexamic acid (TXA). This retrospective chart review identified patients who underwent primary TKA performed by a single surgeon at a single private institution during a 2-year period. All patients received TXA intraoperatively. Exact tests were used to determine whether there was a significant difference in transfusion rates between patients with and without preoperative anemia. Of 628 primary TKA procedures, 390 patients (62.10%) had anemia postoperatively. However, only 1 patient (0.16%) required transfusion. A total of 956 CBC tests were performed without intervention, at a total cost of $116,804.08. In addition, 1 of 26 patients with preoperative anemia vs 0 of 602 patients without preoperative anemia required transfusion (P=.04). Healthy patients undergoing primary TKA who receive TXA do not require postoperative CBC. This change has the potential to reduce this laboratory cost by more than 97% compared with the current practice of obtaining postoperative CBC testing for every patient undergoing TKA. Only patients with preoperative anemia should undergo postoperative CBC testing to help to identify those who require transfusion. The potential health care savings associated with eliminating routine postoperative CBC testing are substantial and should be considered by arthroplasty surgeons. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(1):e26-e30.]., (Copyright 2020, SLACK Incorporated.)

Case: A 72-year-old man presented 20 years after a Morel-Lavallée (ML) lesion with pain and drainage. Biopsies of the lesion and lymph nodes were positive for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). There was no cutaneous involvement or distant metastasis. After chemotherapy and radiation, he underwent resection of the lesion and lymph nodes with flap closure. Two months postoperatively, he unfortunately developed malignant pleural effusions, hypercalcemia, and kidney injury and was eventually transferred to hospice care and died., Conclusion: This is the first report of SCC arising from a ML lesion. Chronic ML lesions should be treated aggressively and monitored for transformation into malignancy, even without cutaneous involvement.

X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH) is associated with a pervasive, severe degenerative osteoarthritis. We conducted a retrospective chart review/patient survey using the Knee or Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form. Fourteen total knee arthroplasties and 7 total hip arthroplasties among 11 patients were included. The mean KOOS-PS score was 31.4 ± 9.7 with a mean follow up of 6.9 years. Mean HOOS-PS score was 14.8 ± 12.9 at a mean follow up of 7.6 years. One knee failed due to aseptic loosening and one hip was revised due to polyethylene wear. In conclusion, total joint arthroplasty is beneficial in XLH.

Background: No previous studies have investigated the risk of infection following intra-articular corticosteroid injection (IACI) into a pre-existing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study is to determine the risk of acute infection following IACI into a pre-existing TKA., Methods: A retrospective chart review identified all patients at a single institution between October 2009 and May 2015 that had an ipsilateral knee injection subsequent to a TKA. The risk of acute infection, as defined by development of an infection within 3 months of IACI, was determined via review of clinic notes, operative reports, laboratory records, and telephone interviews., Results: A total of 1845 injections in 736 patients met the inclusion criteria. In total, 101 (4.8%) patients were lost to follow-up. Three infections in 3 patients occurred within 3 months of IACI, yielding an infection rate of 0.16% per injection, or 1 infection in every 625 IACIs following TKA., Conclusion: This study is the first to investigate the risk of acute infection following injection of corticosteroid into a pre-existing TKA. Given the dire consequences of infection following TKA, the routine use of IACI into a pre-existing TKA should be avoided, and a thorough workup should be performed in any patient with a painful TKA prior to consideration of IACI., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The study of biological processes at cell type resolution requires the isolation of the specific cell types from an organism, but this presents a great technical challenge. In recent years a number of methods have been developed that allow deep analyses of the epigenome, transcriptome, and ribosome-associated mRNA populations in individual cell types. The application of these methods has lead to a clearer understanding of important issues in plant biology, including cell fate specification and cell type-specific responses to the environment. In this review, we discuss current mechanical- and affinity-based technologies available for isolation and analysis of individual cell types in a plant. The integration of these methods is proposed as a means of achieving a holistic view of cellular processes at all levels, from chromatin dynamics to metabolomics. Finally, we explore the limitations of current methods and the needs for future technological development., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Transcriptional gene silencing is a gene regulatory mechanism essential to all organisms. Many transcriptional regulatory mechanisms are associated with epigenetic modifications such as changes in chromatin structure, acetylation and methylation of core histone proteins, and DNA methylation within regulatory regions of endogenous genes and transgenes. Although several maize mutants have been identified from prior forward genetic screens for epigenetic transcriptional silencing, these screens have been far from saturated. Herein, the transcriptionally silent b1 genomic transgene (BTG-silent), a stable, epigenetically silenced transgene in Zea mays (maize), is demonstrated to be an effective phenotype for a forward genetic screen. When the transgene is reactivated, a dark purple plant phenotype is evident because the B1 transcription factor activates anthocyanin biosynthesis, making loss of silencing mutants easy to identify. Using BTG-silent, ten new putative mutants were identified and named transgene reactivated1 through 11 (tgr1-6 and tgr8-11). Three of these mutants have been examined in more detail, and molecular and genetic assays demonstrated that these mutants have both distinct and overlapping phenotypes with previously identified maize mutants that relieve epigenetic transcriptional silencing. Linkage analysis suggests that tgr2 and tgr3 do not correspond to a mutation at previously identified maize loci resulting from other forward genetic screens, while tgr1 shows linkage to a characterized gene. These results suggest that the mutants are a valuable resource for future studies because some of the mutants are likely to reveal genes that encode products required for epigenetic gene regulation in maize but are not currently represented by sequenced mutations.

"In this brief study, I ask the most elementary question about the coherence of [U.S.] central cities and suburbs: are their population changes correlated in any simple way?...Specifically, I ask the following question: suppose one knows the national population growth rate, whether an SMSA component is the central city (cities) or suburbs, and the region in which the SMSA is located, then would the ability to explain the component's population growth rate be improved by knowing which SMSA the component is in?... The conclusion is that there appears to be an SMSA effect on population growth.", (excerpt)

"This paper analyzes a multi-sectoral simulation model of the Indian economy designed to isolate the sources of Indian economic growth and urbanization since 1960. The model shares many common traits with other computable general equilibrium (CGE) simulation models, and its underlying framework is neoclassical. The model stresses spatial issues so that it can provide predictions on rural/urban labor demands, and hence on migration flows. The central issue we seek to evaluate is whether a neoclassical development paradigm can explain adequately the somewhat paradoxical patterns of urbanization and economic growth observed in India since 1960. Our conclusion is a qualified, affirmative response, based on the model's ability to replicate key macroeconomic variables.", (excerpt)