Search

To examine the impact of alvimopan on outcomes and costs in a rigorous enhanced recovery colorectal surgery protocol.Postoperative ileus remains a major source of morbidity and costs in colorectal surgery. Alvimopan has been shown to reduce incidence of postoperative ileus in enhanced recovery colorectal surgery; however, data are equivocal regarding its benefit in reducing length of stay and costs.Patients undergoing major elective enhanced recovery colorectal surgery were identified from a prospectively-collected database (2010-2013). Multivariable analyses were employed to compare outcomes and hospital costs among patients who had alvimopan versus no alvimopan by adjusting for demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics.A total of 660 patients were included; 197 patients received alvimopan and 463 patients had no alvimopan. In unadjusted analysis, the alvimopan group had a faster return of bowel function, shorter length of stay, and lower rates of ileus, Foley re-insertion, and urinary tract infection (all P 0.01). After adjustment, alvimopan was associated with a faster return of bowel function by 0.6 day (P = 0.0006), and lower incidence of postoperative ileus (odds ratio 0.23, P = 0.0002). With adjustment, alvimopan was associated with a shorter length of stay by 1.6 days (P = 0.002), and a hospital cost savings of $1492 per patient (P = 0.01).Alvimopan administration as an element of enhanced recovery colorectal surgery is associated with faster return of bowel function, lower incidence of postoperative ileus, shorter hospitalization, and a significant cost savings. These results suggest that alvimopan is cost-effective in the setting of enhanced recovery colorectal surgery protocols, and should therefore be considered in these programs.

Feeding tube placement is common among patients undergoing gastrectomy, and national guidelines currently recommend consideration of a feeding jejunostomy tube (FJT) for all patients undergoing resection for gastric cancer. However, data are limited regarding the safety of FJT placement at the time of gastrectomy for gastric cancer.The 2005-2011 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant User Files were queried to identify patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Subjects were classified by the concomitant placement of an FJT. Groups were then propensity matched using a 1:1 nearest neighbor algorithm, and outcomes were compared between groups. The primary outcomes of interest were overall 30-d overall complications and mortality. Secondary end points included major complications, surgical site infection, and early reoperation.In total, 2980 subjects underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer, among whom 715 (24%) also had an FJT placed. Patients who had an FJT placed were more likely to be male (61.6% versus 56.6%, P = 0.02), have recent weight loss (21.0% versus 14.8%, P 0.01), and have undergone recent chemotherapy (7.9% versus 4.2%, P 0.01) and radiation therapy (4.2% versus 1.3%, P 0.01). They were also more likely to have undergone total (compared with partial) gastrectomy (66.6% versus 28.6%, P 0.01) and have concomitant resection of an adjacent organ (40.4 versus 24.1%, P 0.01). After adjustment with propensity matching, however, all baseline characteristics and treatment variables were highly similar. Between groups, there were no statistically significant differences in 30-d overall complications (38.8% versus 36.1%, P = 0.32) or mortality (5.8 versus 3.7%, P = 0.08). There were also no differences in major complications, surgical site infection, or early reoperation. Operative time was slightly longer among patients with feeding tubes placed (median, 248 versus 233 min, P = 0.01), but otherwise there were no significant differences in any outcomes between groups.Concomitant placement of FJT at the time of gastrectomy may result in slightly increased operative times but does not appear to lead to increased perioperative morbidity or mortality. Further investigation is needed to identify the patients most likely to benefit from FJT placement.

BACKGROUND: Our study aims to identify the minimum number of lymph nodes (LN) associated with improved survival in patients who underwent NRT for stage II-III rectal cancer. METHODS: Adults with clinical stage II and III rectal adenocarcinoma in the National Cancer Data Base were stratified by NRT. Multivariable Cox regression modeling with restricted cubic splines was used to determine the minimum number of LNs associated with improved survival. RESULTS: Of 38,363 patients, 76% received NRT. After adjustment, a LNY≥12 was associated with improved survival among patients receiving NRT (HR 0.79, p < 0.0001) and those without NRT (HR 0.88, p = 0.04). Among patients receiving NRT, factors independently associated with LNY≥12 were younger age, private insurance, low comorbidity score, a recent year of diagnosis, higher T stage and grade, APR resection, and academic institution. CONCLUSIONS: A minimum LNY of 12 confers a survival benefit for rectal cancer patients regardless of receiving neoadjuvant radiation therapy.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) has demonstrated proven benefit in tumor regression and improved long-term local control for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. However, precise analysis of the optimal waiting time that maximizes oncologic benefits of nCRT has not been established.The 2006-2012 National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients with stage II and III rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent nCRT followed by surgical resection. Time to surgery was defined as the difference between last date of radiotherapy and date of surgery. Primary study endpoints included resection margin positivity and pathologic downstaging. Multivariable regression modeling with restricted cubic splines was used to evaluate the adjusted association between time to surgery and our study endpoints, and to establish an optimal time threshold for surgery.A total of 11,760 patients were included. Median time to surgery was 53 days (interquartile range [IQR] 43 to 63 days). After adjusting for patient demographic, clinical, tumor, and treatment characteristics, our model determined an inflection point at 56 days after end of radiotherapy associated with the highest likelihood of complete resection and pathologic downstaging. With adjustment, the risk of margin positivity was increased in those who underwent surgery after 56 days from end of radiotherapy (odds ratio [OR] 1.40, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.61, p0.001). The likelihood of downstaging was increasing up to 56 days after radiotherapy (≥56 days vs56 days, OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.23, p = 0.01).This study objectively determined the optimal time for surgery after completion of nCRT for rectal cancer based on completeness of resection and tumor downstaging. Eight weeks appears to be the critical threshold for optimal tumor response.

The outcome of systemic and local therapies (e.g., chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, focal ablation) for prostate cancer can be significantly improved by using tumor-specific adjuvants prior to treatment (“preconditioning”). We propose to use dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) to monitor the in vivo response of a mouse model of prostate cancer treated with a vascular disruptive agent, TNF-α, delivered on a gold nanoparticle (NP-TNF). Six male nude mice bearing 4–5 weeks old LNCaP tumors were scanned at 9.4T. DCE-MRI was performed two days before and 4–5 hours after treatment with NP-TNF. An intraperitoneal bolus of Gadolinium-DTPA (Gd) was administered and contrast enhancement was measured for 90 minutes. Concentration time curves of Gd were calculated and the area under the Gd curve (AUGC) was determined pre and post treatment. NP-TNF treatment caused an increase in contrast uptake in tumors. Interestingly, the early concentration (10 minutes post Gd bolus i.p.) was similar in both untreated and treated conditions; however, 90 minutes after injection, [Gd] was 3.4 times higher after treatment compared to before. AUGC doubled from 11 ± 6 [Gd] × min before treatment to 22 ± 9 [Gd] × min after treatment. An increase in signal enhancement was also observed in the muscle but to a lesser degree. We also evaluated the kinetics of intravenous gadolinium administration in mice bearing a jugular vein catheter to mimic the delivery method used in clinical trials. The overall treatment effects were independent of the delivery pathway of the contrast agent. In conclusion, we show that DCE-MRI is suitable to detect changes associated with a vascular disruptive agent in a mouse model of prostate cancer. The ability to characterize the effects of nanoparticle therapy in vivo with non-destructive methods is important as such compounds, in combination with treatment strategies, progress towards clinical trials.