Search

Background and purpose: Eptinezumab reduced monthly migraine days more than placebo in the DELIVER study, a clinical trial with patients with difficult‐to‐treat migraine and prior preventive treatment failures. This post hoc analysis assesses the sustained response to eptinezumab at the population and patient level and evaluates the potential for response in initial non‐responders. Methods: Adults with chronic or episodic migraine and two to four prior preventive treatment failures were randomized to eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg or placebo every 12 weeks. Primary outcomes in this post hoc analysis are the proportion of patients with ≥30%, ≥50% or ≥75% reduction in monthly migraine days (i.e., migraine responder rates [MRRs]) during weeks 1–12 and weeks 13–24 and across 4‐week intervals. Secondary outcomes are maintenance and shifts in MRRs from weeks 1–12 to weeks 13–24. Results: Between weeks 1–12 and 13–24, ≥30% MRRs increased from 65.9% to 70.4% (100 mg) and from 71.0% to 74.5% (300 mg), versus 36.9% to 43.1% (placebo). The ≥50% and ≥75% MRRs were sustained or increased over the 24‐week period. The largest increase in ≥30% MRRs occurred after the second infusion with eptinezumab. The percentage of initial non‐responders (<30% MRRs during weeks 1–12) who experienced response (≥30% MRRs during weeks 13–24) to the second dose was 34.7% (100 mg) and 30.4% (300 mg) with eptinezumab versus 21.1% with placebo. Conclusion: Across MRR thresholds, most patients who responded to eptinezumab during weeks 1–12 maintained or improved response during weeks 13–24. More than one‐third of initial non‐responders became responders after their second infusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Migraine is a common, chronic disorder of the brain causing much disability, as well as personal, familial and societal impact. Several oral preventive agents are available in different countries for the prevention of migraine, but none have performed better than 50% improvement in 50% of patients in a clinical trial. Additionally, each has various possible adverse events making their tolerability less than optimal. Recently, three monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) ligand (LY2951742, ALD403 and TEV-48125) and one targeting the CGRP receptor (AMG 334) have completed phase 2 trials, and the results have been reported. These early results show them all to be somewhat more effective than placebo, with no serious adverse events. Three have been studied for episodic migraine, and only TEV-48125 has been studied for both high frequency episodic and chronic migraine. Moreover, preliminary data suggests that neurostimulation is effective in migraine treatment, including stimulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion, transcutaneous supraorbital and supratrochlear nerve, and transcutaneous vagus nerve. In this article, these innovative therapies will be reviewed.

The c-AMP-responsive element binding protein (CREB) and its phosphorylated product (P-CREB) are nuclear proteins expressed after stimulation of pain-producing areas of the spinal cord. There is evidence indicating that central sensitization within dorsal horn neurons is dependent on P-CREB transcriptional regulation. The objectives of the study were to investigate the expression of P-CREB in cells in rat trigeminal nucleus caudalis after noxious stimulation and to determine whether pre-treatment with specific anti-migraine agents modulate this expression. CREB and P-CREB labelling was investigated within the trigeminal caudalis by immunohistochemistry after capsaicin stimulation. Subsequently, the effect of i.v. pre-treatment with either sumatriptan (n = 5), or naratriptan (n = 7) on P-CREB expression was studied. Five animals pre-treated with i.v. normal saline were served as controls. CREB and P-CREB labelling was robust in all animal groups within Sp5C. Both naratriptan and sumatriptan decreased P-CREB expression (p = 0.0003 and 0.0013) within the Sp5C. Triptans attenuate activation of CREB within the central parts of the trigeminal system, thereby leading to potential inhibition of central sensitization. P-CREB may serve as a new marker for post-synaptic neuronal activation within Sp5C in animal models relevant to migraine.

Migraine is a leading cause of disability in more than one billion people worldwide, yet it remains universally underappreciated, even by individuals with the condition. Among other shortcomings, current treatments (often repurposed agents) have limited efficacy and potential adverse effects, leading to low treatment adherence. After the introduction of agents that target the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway, another new drug class, the ditans — a group of selective serotonin 5-HT1F receptor agonists — has just reached the international market. Here, we review preclinical studies from the late 1990s and more recent clinical research that contributed to the development of the ditans and led to their approval for acute migraine treatment by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency. Ditans are a recently developed drug class for the treatment of acute migraine. In this Review, the authors provide an overview of ditan development, from the initial rationale to the clinical studies that led to the recent FDA approval of the first ditan. Key points: Various animal studies have shown that selective agonists for the serotonin 5-HT1F receptor can reduce signals from an activated trigeminovascular system, thereby highlighting the receptor as an attractive target for symptomatic treatment of migraine. Long-term clinical studies involving two ditans — a group of 5-HT1F agonists — have provided class I evidence that lasmiditan, the first ditan, is both effective and safe in the symptomatic treatment of migraine. The 5-HT1F receptor is expressed by cells within the brain parenchyma, as well as by the trigeminal neurons, but not in vascular smooth muscle, suggesting that ditans act through neuropeptide release leading to acute headache relief, rather than via potential vasoactive properties, such as vasodilatation. Dizziness is the most common adverse event of lasmiditan; thus people should not drive for 8 h after taking lasmiditan. Development of novel ditans that do not cross the blood–brain barrier is expected to result in better tolerability and improved clinical use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]