Search

Aim The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Interactive Voice Response (IVR) program to rate the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score in Japanese depressive patients. Methods Depression severity was assessed in 60 patients by a clinician and psychologists using HAM-D. Scoring by the IVR program was conducted on the same and the following days. Test–retest reliability, internal consistency, and concurrent validity for total HAM-D scores were examined by calculating intraclass correlation coefficient, Cronbach's alpha, and Pearson's correlation coefficient. Inter-rater consistency for each HAM-D item was examined by Cohen's kappa. Results Test–retest reliability of the IVR program was high (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.93). Internal consistency of each total score obtained by the clinician, psychologists, and IVR program was high (Cronbach's alpha: 0.77, 0.79, 0.78, and 0.83). Regarding concurrent validity, correlation coefficients between total scores obtained by the clinician versus IVR and that by the clinician versus psychologists were high (0.81 and 0.93). The HAM-D total score rated by the clinician was 3 points lower than that of IVR. Inter-rater consistency for each HAM-D item evaluated by the clinician versus IVR was estimated to be fair (Cohen's kappa coefficient: 0.02–0.50). Conclusion Our results suggest that the Japanese IVR HAM-D program is reliable and valid to assess 17-item HAM-D total score in Japanese depressive patients. However, the current program tends to overestimate depression severity, and the score of each item did not always show high agreement with clinician's rating, which warrants further improvement in the program.

Background Growing evidence suggests that schizotypy and genetic loading for schizophrenia both represent risk for the development of schizophrenia. Although these conditions are known to be associated with neurocognitive impairments, such an association has not been studied in patients with bipolar II disorder (BPII) or unipolar major depressive disorder (UP). Methods Forty-one depressed patients with BPII, 131 patients with UP and demographically matched 225 healthy controls were recruited. Schizotypy was assessed by the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire. Neuropsychological functioning was measured by the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised, the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Results Mood disorder patients performed significantly worse than controls in verbal and visual memory, working memory and processing speed. BPII patients performed significantly more poorly than UP patients in verbal memory and executive functioning. Both BPII and UP patients demonstrated significantly greater schizotypal traits than controls. Schizotypy was significantly negatively correlated with verbal comprehension both in BPII and UP patients and with working memory and processing speed in healthy controls. Patients who had one or more first-degree relatives with schizophrenia performed significantly more poorly than the remaining patients in all cognitive domains. Limitations Most of our patients were on psychotropic medication, and the sample of BPII patients was not very large. Conclusions Liability for schizophrenia could play a pivotal role in neurocognitive functioning in mood disorders, suggesting that such liability might lie on a continuum ranging from normality through mood disorders to full-blown schizophrenia.

Human P-glycoprotein (P-gp), which is encoded by ABCB1 (ATP-binding cassette, sub-family B member 1), is expressed in the blood brain barrier and protects the brain from many kinds of drugs and toxins including glucocorticoids by acting as an efflux pump. We examined whether functional polymorphisms of ABCB1 give susceptibility to major depressive disorder (MDD). The five functional single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), A-41G (rs2188524), T-129C (rs3213619), C1236T (Gly412Gly: rs1128503), G2677A/T (Ala893Ser/Thr: rs2032582), and C3435T (Ile1145Ile: rs1045642) were genotyped in 631 MDD patients and 1100 controls in the Japanese population. A tri-allelic SNP, G2677A/T, was genotyped by pyrosequencing and the remaining SNPs were genotyped by the TaqMan 5'-exonuclease allelic discrimination assay. The minor T3435 allele was significantly increased in MDD patients than in the controls (χ(2) = 4.5, df = 1, p = 0.034, odds ratio [OR] 1.16, 95% confidential interval [CI] 1.01-1.34). Homozygotes for the T3435 allele was significantly more common in patients than in the controls (χ(2) = 7.5, df = 1, p = 0.0062, OR 1.43, 95%CI 1.11-1.85). With respect to the other 4 SNPs, there was no significant difference in genotype or allele distribution. In the haplotype-based analysis, the proportion of individuals with the TT1236-TT3435 haploid genotype was significantly increased in patients than in controls (χ(2) = 8.5, df = 1, p = 0.0037, OR 1.50, 95%CI 1.14-1.98). Our results suggest that the T3435 allele or carrying two copies of this allele confers susceptibility to MDD in the Japanese population.

Background: Mood disorders are associated with various neurocognitive deficits. However, few studies have reported the impairment of motor dexterity in unipolar depression and bipolar disorder. In the present study, manual dexterity was compared between unipolar major depression, bipolar disorder, and healthy controls. Methods: Manual dexterity was assessed by the Purdue pegboard test in 98 patients with unipolar major depression, 48 euthymic or depressed patients with bipolar disorder, and 158 healthy controls, matched for age and gender. Results: Compared to healthy controls, sum of the scores of right, left, and both hands subtests (R + L+ B) was significantly lower in both patients with unipolar depression and bipolar disorder (P= 0.0034 and P, Article, JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS. 136(3):1047-1052 (2012)

Background: Although some core personality variables are known to be characteristic of unipolar or bipolar depression, few studies have compared the personality profile between these two disorders. Methods: Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) was employed to assess the personality of 36 depressed patients with bipolar II disorder (BPII), 90 patients with unipolar major depressive disorder (UP), and 306 healthy controls. The TCI was administered during the depressive episode in BPII and UP patients so that the results can be applied in a clinical setting. Results: Significantly higher scores in harm avoidance (p, Article, JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS. 132(3):319-324 (2011)

Background Evidence shows that depression is associated with hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis hyperactivation, although such findings are not entirely unequivocal. In contrast, various psychiatric conditions, including atypical depression, are associated with hypocortisolism. Another line of research has demonstrated that personality is associated with HPA axis alteration. It is thus hypothesized that different personality pathology in depression would be associated with distinct cortisol reactivity. Methods Eighty-seven outpatients with DSM-IV major depressive disorder were recruited. Personality was assessed by the temperament and character inventory (TCI). HPA axis reactivity was measured by the combined dexamethasone (DEX)/corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) test. According to our previous studies, two subgroups were considered based on their cortisol responses to the DEX/CRH test: incomplete-suppressors whose cortisol response was exaggerated and enhanced-suppressors whose cortisol response was blunted. Results The analysis of covariance, controlling for age, gender and symptom severity, revealed that incomplete-suppressors scored significantly higher on cooperativeness than enhanced-suppressors ( p =0.002). A multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis predicting the cortisol suppression pattern from the seven TCI dimensions, controlling for age, gender and symptom severity, revealed that lower cooperativeness ( p =0.001) and higher reward dependence ( p =0.018) were significant predictors toward enhanced suppression. Limitations The neuroendocrine challenge test was administered only once, based on a simple test protocol. Conclusions Our findings suggest that (personality-related) subtypes of depression might be differentiated based on the different pattern of cortisol reactivity. Future studies are warranted to further characterize the HPA axis alteration in relation to various subtypes of depression.

The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Interactive Voice Response (IVR) program to rate the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score in Japanese depressive patients.Depression severity was assessed in 60 patients by a clinician and psychologists using HAM-D. Scoring by the IVR program was conducted on the same and the following days. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and concurrent validity for total HAM-D scores were examined by calculating intraclass correlation coefficient, Cronbach's alpha, and Pearson's correlation coefficient. Inter-rater consistency for each HAM-D item was examined by Cohen's kappa.Test-retest reliability of the IVR program was high (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.93). Internal consistency of each total score obtained by the clinician, psychologists, and IVR program was high (Cronbach's alpha: 0.77, 0.79, 0.78, and 0.83). Regarding concurrent validity, correlation coefficients between total scores obtained by the clinician versus IVR and that by the clinician versus psychologists were high (0.81 and 0.93). The HAM-D total score rated by the clinician was 3 points lower than that of IVR. Inter-rater consistency for each HAM-D item evaluated by the clinician versus IVR was estimated to be fair (Cohen's kappa coefficient: 0.02-0.50).Our results suggest that the Japanese IVR HAM-D program is reliable and valid to assess 17-item HAM-D total score in Japanese depressive patients. However, the current program tends to overestimate depression severity, and the score of each item did not always show high agreement with clinician's rating, which warrants further improvement in the program.