Search

Purpose: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKAs) are available in the market as fixed‐ and mobile‐bearing (FB and MB) and can be characterised by a different set of design parameters in terms of geometries, materials and surgical approaches, with overall good clinical outcomes. However, clear biomechanical evidence concerning the consequences of variations of these features on knee biomechanics is still lacking; therefore, the present study aims to perform a sensitivity analysis to see which outcomes are affected by these variations. Methods: For both MB‐UKA and FB‐UKA, five design and surgical parameters were defined (bearing insert thickness, tibial component material, implant components friction coefficient, antero‐posterior slope angle and level of tibial bone resection). Two control models were defined based on standard configurations for both implants. Finite element analysis was chosen to perform this study, and different parameter combinations (216 models in total) were implemented and tested at both 0° and 90° of flexion, using a previously validated finite element knee model. The results were then evaluated in terms of bone and polyethylene Von Mises stress and tibio‐femoral contact area. Results: Bearing thickness, tibial bone cut and slope angle were found to be the most sensitive parameters for both types of UKAs. Specifically, changes in these parameters in the FB‐UKA appeared to induce more significant variations in the polyethylene insert (both in terms of polyethylene stress and contact area), while in the MB‐UKA, these changes influenced bone stress distribution more. Conclusions: Surgical parameters returned to have a more significant influence than material and friction variations; furthermore, the outcomes most affected by parameter variations were the insert‐related ones for FB‐UKA while for the MB‐UKA were the ones regarding tibial bone stresses. Level of Evidence: Not Applicable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Mobile bearing fracture is a rare long‐term complication of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), and relevant reports are sparse. Hence, its treatment options need further exploration. Case Presentation This study presents the case of fracture of a polyethylene insert that occurred 12 years after mobile bearing medial UKA in a 75‐year‐old overweight woman who then underwent surgical intervention at our institution. However, we encountered significant challenges in removing the fragments from the broken bearing, resulting in retention of the remaining one‐third of the fragment. We solved this problem by replacing the fractured insert with thicker mobile bearing. During the 1‐month postoperative follow‐up, the patient achieved good range of motion and excellent satisfaction, with no reported complications and a Knee Society Score of 90. Additionally, we reviewed the literature on the treatment for mobile bearing fractures after UKA. Conclusions Bearing fracture is a rare cause of failure of mobile bearing UKA. This case highlights the challenges of UKA fracture bearing retrieval and underscores that mobile bearing replacement can be an effective intervention. The case we report shows that when removal of a residual meniscal bearing in a posterior dislocation is difficult to achieve, compromise may be an appropriate option because it does not cause additional complaints to the patient. This case emphasizes the importance of the surgeon having a thorough preoperative understanding of the location and potential pitfalls of fracture fragments in such situations.

Background: Mobile bearing fracture is a rare long‐term complication of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), and relevant reports are sparse. Hence, its treatment options need further exploration. Case Presentation: This study presents the case of fracture of a polyethylene insert that occurred 12 years after mobile bearing medial UKA in a 75‐year‐old overweight woman who then underwent surgical intervention at our institution. However, we encountered significant challenges in removing the fragments from the broken bearing, resulting in retention of the remaining one‐third of the fragment. We solved this problem by replacing the fractured insert with thicker mobile bearing. During the 1‐month postoperative follow‐up, the patient achieved good range of motion and excellent satisfaction, with no reported complications and a Knee Society Score of 90. Additionally, we reviewed the literature on the treatment for mobile bearing fractures after UKA. Conclusions: Bearing fracture is a rare cause of failure of mobile bearing UKA. This case highlights the challenges of UKA fracture bearing retrieval and underscores that mobile bearing replacement can be an effective intervention. The case we report shows that when removal of a residual meniscal bearing in a posterior dislocation is difficult to achieve, compromise may be an appropriate option because it does not cause additional complaints to the patient. This case emphasizes the importance of the surgeon having a thorough preoperative understanding of the location and potential pitfalls of fracture fragments in such situations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Purpose Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKAs) are available in the market as fixed‐ and mobile‐bearing (FB and MB) and can be characterised by a different set of design parameters in terms of geometries, materials and surgical approaches, with overall good clinical outcomes. However, clear biomechanical evidence concerning the consequences of variations of these features on knee biomechanics is still lacking; therefore, the present study aims to perform a sensitivity analysis to see which outcomes are affected by these variations. Methods For both MB‐UKA and FB‐UKA, five design and surgical parameters were defined (bearing insert thickness, tibial component material, implant components friction coefficient, antero‐posterior slope angle and level of tibial bone resection). Two control models were defined based on standard configurations for both implants. Finite element analysis was chosen to perform this study, and different parameter combinations (216 models in total) were implemented and tested at both 0° and 90° of flexion, using a previously validated finite element knee model. The results were then evaluated in terms of bone and polyethylene Von Mises stress and tibio‐femoral contact area. Results Bearing thickness, tibial bone cut and slope angle were found to be the most sensitive parameters for both types of UKAs. Specifically, changes in these parameters in the FB‐UKA appeared to induce more significant variations in the polyethylene insert (both in terms of polyethylene stress and contact area), while in the MB‐UKA, these changes influenced bone stress distribution more. Conclusions Surgical parameters returned to have a more significant influence than material and friction variations; furthermore, the outcomes most affected by parameter variations were the insert‐related ones for FB‐UKA while for the MB‐UKA were the ones regarding tibial bone stresses. Level of Evidence Not Applicable.

The purposes of this study were to propose a quantitative method of bearing overhang to minimize the effect of bearing spinning on mobile‐bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MB UKA), suggest and apply safe bearing regions in daily activities. The overhang distance and area were calculated for neutral and spinning positions. The safe bearing regions were based on the relationship between bearing overhang and linear wear rate. Eleven patients were included in an in‐vivo experiment under dual fluoroscopic imaging following medial MB UKA. The bearing position was tracked by minimal joint space width, and the bearing overhang was calculated accordingly. Due to an equal contribution of 1 mm increase in medial overhang and 30 mm2 overhang areato wear rate, the maximum effect of potential bearing spinning on medial overhang distance was approximately three times as large as the overhang area. The safe bearing distance and area regions were rectangles and arches with different scales for different size combinations of bearing, femoral and tibial components. The maximum bearing overhang area during lunge (R = 0.76, p = 0.006) and open‐chain exercise (R = 0.68, p = 0.02) significantly correlated with the overhang area in standing. The overhang area can be an appropriate parameter for evaluating dislocation degree less affected by potential bearing spinning than the overhang distance in clinical practice. The corresponding safe overhang area regions were proposed for surgical planning and postoperative dislocation degree evaluation. The bearing overhang area in static standing posture can be a valuable reference to estimate the dynamic overhang area and dislocation degree during motion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is an increasingly common surgical intervention for patients with end-stage ankle arthritis, there is a need to better understand the dynamic performance of prosthetic implants during activities of daily living. Our purpose was to quantify and compare relative tibiotalar motion during gait in persons with a fixed-bearing (FB) and mobile-bearing (MB) total ankle arthroplasty. We hypothesized a FB prosthesis would have lower tibiotalar range of motion (ROM). Patients at least 12 months postoperative with either a FB (n=5) or MB (n=3) total ankle arthroplasty were tested. We used high-speed biplanar videoradiography to quantify tibiotalar kinematics during self-selected gait. Angular and linear ROM in three axes were compared between the groups. ROM for dorsiflexion-plantarflexion, internal-external rotation, and inversion-eversion angles in FB subjects averaged 7.47±4.05°, 7.39±3.63°, and 4.51±2.13°, respectively. ROM in MB subjects averaged 6.74±2.04°, 6.28±4.51°, and 5.68±2.81°, respectively. Linear ROM along anteroposterior, mediolateral, and superior-inferior axes in FB subjects averaged 1.47±2.07 mm, 1.13±1.49 mm, and 0.28±0.30 mm, respectively. Linear ROM in MB subjects averaged 0.68±1.44 mm, 0.60±1.41 mm, and 0.20±0.13 mm, respectively. We found no significant difference between the two groups for any of these ROM parameters (p>0.05). Total ankle arthroplasty using either FB or MB design appears to confer similar ankle motion during the gait cycle in this biplanar fluoroscopic model. Level IV, case series. • X-ray motion analysis is a useful tool to compare ankle arthroplasty systems. • No differences in angular motion between MB and FB arthroplasty systems. • No significant difference in linear translation along joint axes in both systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study aimed to meta-analyze epidemiological data, revision rates, and incidences of different designs of a single Total Knee Arthroplasty System and compare these factors across different countries. Methods: A systematic review was conducted on clinical studies and arthroplasty registries of ATTUNE TKA from 1999 to 2020. The main endpoints analyzed were revision rates and epidemiological data. Results: The average age of patients was 67.8 years, with a gender distribution of 60% female and 40% male. The pooled average BMI was 29.4 kg/m2. Eight clinical studies showed a pooled revision rate per 100 observed CY of 0.5 (n = 1343 cases). Cumulative revision rates after 1, 3, and 5 years varied among registries, with the Swiss registry having the highest revision data (after 5 years: 6.3%) and the American registry having the lowest revision data (after 5 years: 1.7%). A comparison of the revision rates of mobile bearing and fixed bearing (41,200 cases) as well as cruciate retaining and posterior stabilized (n = 123,361 cases) showed no significant advantage in the first 5 years after implantation. Conclusion: In conclusion, pooled data from 41,200 cases of TKA with a single Total Knee Arthroplasty System in two arthroplasty registries revealed that there was no significant difference in revision rates between the mobile bearing and fixed bearing design within the first 5 years after implantation. In addition, a comparison of the revision rates in n = 123,361 cases showed no significant advantage for cruciate retaining or posterior stabilized in the first 5 years after implantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) is one of the effective interventions for the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Moreover, it has multiple advantages over total knee arthroplasty (TKA), including reduced intraoperative blood loss, decreased risk of transfusion, and faster recovery. This study aimed to discuss critical technical considerations regarding UKR and some of the controversies and updates. Methods: We conducted a review to provide an overview of the controversies and technical considerations about UKR in several aspects. Only peer-reviewed articles were included, up to December 2023 using PubMed, Google Scholar, ERIC, and Cochrane database for systematic reviews databases. Result: UKR is associated with superior patient-reported clinical and functional outcomes, as well as shorter hospital stays, fewer postoperative complications, and revealed favorable outcomes in patients' return to sport. The choice between mobile- and fixed-bearing prostheses depends, in part, on the surgeon's preference. The mobile-bearing UKR is a less constrained prosthesis and can potentially result in less wear, but it is more technically demanding. While no significant difference between mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing prostheses, cementless is superior to cemented design. Furthermore, UKR can be a good alternative for high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and still can be considered after a failed HTO. Lastly, recent reviews have shown a revision rate comparable to that of TKA. This is probably influenced by Improved comprehension of the best indications, patient selection criteria, as well as of the design, materials, and technological advances. Conclusion: UKR treatment for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis is secure and effective. Based on clinical and functional outcomes, decreased morbidity and mortality, and cost-effectiveness, long-term studies suggest that UKR is superior to TKA. Further investigation in this area is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ankle osteoarthritis (OA) represents a significant social burden and is one of the main causes of chronic disability in a rapidly growing part of the world's population. Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has become increasingly popular despite the poor results obtained with the first dedicated designs. The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the ankle kinematics, in vivo and under weight-bearing conditions, of a TAA through a dynamic model-based radiostereometric analysis (MB-RSA). The clinical evaluation was performed by administering the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle–hindfoot score and Short Form-36 questionnaires. The kinematic evaluation was conducted through MB-RSA during the execution of an open kinetic chain and a closed kinetic chain motor task. Double radiographic images of the ankle joint were processed using dedicated software to obtain a 3D reconstruction of the ankle prosthetic components' motion. Eighteen patients (five females) completed the clinical and instrumental preoperative and postoperative evaluations (age 59.1 ± 10.3). All clinical scores showed a marked improvement (p < 0.005). During the closed kinetic chain motor tasks, the ankle showed a total range of motion (ROM) in dorsi-plantarflexion of 19.84°. The parameters in varus–valgus were recorded. Physiological motion can be achieved in TAA, characterized by a wide range of motion and coupling of movements on the three planes. The results of the present work may help to understand the real movement of a widespread TAA model and possibly to improve future designs and instrumentation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) represents a treatment option to address knee pain deriving from either the medial or lateral compartment of the knee. Compared to total knee arthroplasty, UKA offers the advantages of preserving native bone stock, offering less surgical exposure and risks, and better restoring native knee kinematics. The UKA is a specialized procedure that has its best outcomes in the hands of an experienced surgeon who performs UKA repeatedly and with proper patient selection. In this review, we discuss current concepts for both medial UKA and lateral UKA with regard to indications, isolated knee compartment osteoarthritis clinical and radiographic work-up, surgical approaches, and patient outcomes, as well as analyzing the differences between fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing implant designs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Total knee replacement (TKR) procedures are widely used in cases of advanced knee osteoarthritis, and satisfactory results are achieved. Although the fixed-bearing (FB) design has been reported as the gold standard by many authors, the mobile-bearing (MB) design has been argued to have more harmonious articulation and to cause less contact stress on the joint surface. This study aims to compare mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee replacement designs and presenting the clinical outcomes. Material and Methods: The study includes 212 patients who’ve undergone MB and FB implants with identical design, had at least three years of follow-ups, and had their range of motion, pain scores, implant survival, and functional scores recorded. Result: When comparing the MB and FB designs, the MB group has 106 cases with an average age of 63.1±8.0, and the FB group has 116 cases with an average age of 63.9±7.0 years; no significant difference was observed between the groups. Also, no significant difference was observed regarding Knee Society scores (KSS), range of motion (ROM), or visual analogue scales (VAS) between the first year and last follow-up. The mean follow-up times of the two groups are 62.4 months (range=38-92) for the MB group and 66.8 months (range=40-88) for the FB group. Each group also had similar complication rates. Conclusion: The clinical and functional results for both the MBand FB-design total knee prostheses are excellent. Despite the many theoretical advantages of MB total knee replacement, this study shows little significant difference in the early functional outcomes between MB and FB prostheses. The study concludes neither MB- or FB-design TKR to have clinically superiority. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been particularly prevalent because the concept of knee preservation is deeply rooted in people's minds. Mobile bearing UKA is a surgical type of UKA with considerable advantages. This note describes some surgical techniques, including patient position, surgical field exposure, selection of the size of the prosthesis, sagittal tibial osteotomy, placement of the femoral prosthesis and gap balance, to assist surgeons with less experience in performing these operations successfully. The techniques described in this note have been used in over 500 Oxford UKA cases, and nearly 95% patients achieved good prosthesis position and satisfactory postoperative outcome. We hope that the empirical summaries from numerous cases will help surgeons to learn Oxford UKA quickly and effectively, driving the spread of the technique and benefiting more patients.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the in vivo kinematics of the same femoral design mechanically aligned posterior-stabilised (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with either fixed-bearing (FB) or mobile-bearing (MB) inlay, implanted by the same surgeon, using model-based dynamic radiostereometric analysis (RSA). The hypothesis of the present study was that the MB design would show wider axial rotation than the FB design, without affecting the clinical outcomes. Materials and methods: A cohort of 21 non-randomised patients (21 DePuy Attune PS-FB) was evaluated by dynamic RSA analysis at a minimum 9-month follow-up, while performing differently demanding daily living activities such as sit to stand (STS) and deep knee lunge (DKL). Kinematic data were compared with those of a cohort of 22 patients implanted with the same prosthetic design but with MB inlay. Anterior–posterior (AP) translations, varus–valgus (VV) and internal–external (IE) rotations of the femoral component with respect to the tibial baseplate were investigated. Translation of medial and lateral compartment was analysed using the low point method according to Freeman et al. Questionnaires to calculate objective and subjective clinical scores were administered preoperatively and during follow-up visit by the same investigator. Results: The FB TKA design showed lower AP translation during STS (6.8 ± 3.3 mm in FB vs 9.9 ± 3.7 mm in MB, p = 0.006*), lower VV rotation (1.9 ± 0.8° in FB vs 5.3 ± 3.3° in MB, p = 0.005) and lower IE rotation (2.8 ± 1.1° in FB vs 9.5 ± 4.3° in MB, p = 0.001) during DKL than the mobile-bearing TKA design. Posterior-stabilised FB group showed significant lower translation of the low point of the medial compartment than the MB group (p = 0.008). The percentage of patients performing medial pivot in the FB group was higher compared to MB group in the examined motor tasks. No significant differences in post-operative range of motion (117° ± 16° for FB group and 124° ± 13° for MB group) and in clinical outcomes emerged between the two cohort. Conclusions: The FB and MB designs differed in AP translations, VV rotations and IE rotations of the femoral component with respect to the tibial component in STS and DKL. Furthermore, FB cohort reported a significant higher percentage of medial pivot with respect to MB cohort. Despite this, no differences in clinical outcomes were detected between groups. Both designs showed stable kinematics and represent a viable option in primary TKA. Level of evidence: Prospective cohort study, II. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: It is preferable to reduce postoperative excessive rotational mismatch between the femur and tibia that causes poor clinical results following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study is to compare postoperative rotational mismatches and clinical outcomes with mobile- and fixed-bearing prostheses. Materials and methods: This study classified 190 TKAs into two groups equally by propensity score matching: mobile-bearing group (n = 95) and fixed-bearing group (n = 95). Computed tomography images of the whole leg were taken at 2 weeks postoperatively. The component alignments, rotational mismatches between the femur and tibia, and rotations among components were measured three-dimensionally. The knee range of motion, New Knee Society Score (KSS) subjective sores, and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) were assessed at the final follow-up. Results: Rotational mismatch between the femur and tibia was significantly less in the mobile- (− 0.8° ± 7.3°) than in the fixed-bearing (3.3° ± 8.5°, p < 0.001) group. New KSS functional activity score was significantly poorer in patients with excessive rotational mismatch (61.3 ± 21.4) than in those without it (49.5 ± 20.6, p = 0.02). Comparing mobile-bearing prosthesis, the use of fixed-bearing prosthesis was a risk factor for postoperative excessive rotational mismatch (odds ratio: 2.32, p = 0.03). Conclusion: When compared to a fixed-bearing prosthesis, TKA using a mobile-bearing prosthesis could suppress the postoperative rotational mismatch between the femur and tibia that causes poor subjective functional activity score. However, since this study was conducted for PS-TKA, the results might not be applicable to other models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The optimal tibial component rotational alignment in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty has not been defined. This study aimed to explore the effect of tibial component rotational alignment on the clinical outcomes of UKA. Methods Clinical and follow-up data from 269 patients were retrospectively analysed. They were assigned into Groups A (− 5° to 0°), B (0°–3°), C (3°–6°) and D (> 6°) according to the external rotation of the tibial component to Akagi’s line. The Knee Society Score clinical (KSS-c), Knee Society Score function (KSS-f), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and postoperative complications at 2 years postsurgically were analysed. Results The mean rotation of the tibial component relative to Akagi’s line in 269 patients was 4.56 ± 3.79°. There were 15, 84, 89 and 81 patients in Groups A, B, C and D, respectively. The postoperative KSS-c and KSS-f in Groups B and C were significantly higher than those in Group D. No significant differences in KSS-c and KSS-f were detected between Groups B and C. The postoperative FJS in Group B was significantly higher than that in Group C, which was significantly higher in Group C than in Group D. There were 5, 8 and 15 cases of postoperative knee pain in Groups B, C and D, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion Tibial component rotational alignment is of significance to Oxford Phase III UKA in patients. External rotation of the tibial component by 0°–3° is optimal to achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: In this retrospective study, we compared the functionality and clinical outcomes of patients with severe varus knees who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) that used prostheses with either a posterior stabilized (PS) design or an ultra-congruent (UC) design. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Primary TKA was performed in 161 patients; the UC device was used in 82 (51%) cases and the PS device in 79 (49%). Preoperatively and at the final follow-up examination, all patients were evaluated by orthoroentgenography. The mechanical axis angle and radiolucent lines were evaluated according to the Knee Society Roentgenographic Evaluation System on preoperative and 5-year follow-up radiographs. Total Knee Society Score (KSS) (knee score/function score) and Visual Analog Scale scores were obtained at the final follow-up examination. Demographic and surgical data and revision rates were evaluated for all patients. RESULTS: Postoperative angle values were significantly decreased in both the UC and PS groups (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Postoperative flexion range of motion values were significantly increased in both the UC and PS groups (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). The postoperative KSS function scores were not significantly different between the groups (p=0.194). The mean surgical time of the PS group (54.99±4.18 minutes) was significantly higher than that of the UC group (46.02±4.48 minutes) (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: No notable differences were found between the UC and PS groups with respect to the clinical and functional parameters examined. Based on these results, UC TKA can be considered a safe alternative to PS TKA in severe varus knees. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been particularly prevalent because the concept of knee preservation is deeply rooted in people's minds. Mobile bearing UKA is a surgical type of UKA with considerable advantages. This note describes some surgical techniques, including patient position, surgical field exposure, selection of the size of the prosthesis, sagittal tibial osteotomy, placement of the femoral prosthesis and gap balance, to assist surgeons with less experience in performing these operations successfully. The techniques described in this note have been used in over 500 Oxford UKA cases, and nearly 95% patients achieved good prosthesis position and satisfactory postoperative outcome. We hope that the empirical summaries from numerous cases will help surgeons to learn Oxford UKA quickly and effectively, driving the spread of the technique and benefiting more patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a successful treatment for antero-medial osteoarthritis. However, there are few published studies on the long-term survival of this procedure. The purpose of this study was to review the 15-year minimum outcomes and survival of a mobile-bearing medial UKA. A retrospective review was performed between July 2004 and December 2006 of all patients who underwent a medial UKA eligible for a minimum of 15-year follow-up. The initial query revealed 299 patients (349 knees). One hundred-seventeen patients died or were lost to follow-up, leaving 182 patients (219 knees) for analyses. Clinical outcomes and survivorship were analyzed. There were 59 implant-related reoperations which occurred at a mean of 10 years (range, 0 to 16 years). The most common reasons for reoperation were arthritic progression (9.1%) and aseptic loosening (9.1%). The 10-year survival with revision to TKA was 89% (95% confidence interval: 86% to 92.4%), and the 15-year survival was 84.1% (95% confidence interval: 80.3% to 88%). There were no statistically significant differences in survival between sex, body mass index, and age. Patients who were not revised had statistically significant improvements in knee range of motion and Knee Society scores. This study found similar long-term survival of a medial mobile-bearing UKA to published total knee arthroplasty outcomes. The implant evaluated in this study has undergone subsequent improvements in instrumentation and design. Further analyses should be performed on the long-term outcomes of the current implant platform. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The aim of the present study was to assess clinical outcome and mid-term survivorship of mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients 50 years of age or younger. Methods: This study reports the results of 119 patients (130 knees) following mobile-bearing medial UKA. Primary indication was advanced osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis of the femoral condyle. The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) as well as the collateral ligaments were functionally intact, the varus deformity was manually correctable and there was no evidence of osteoarthritis in the lateral compartment. Survivorship analysis was performed with different endpoints and clinical outcome was measured using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), American Knee Society Score and Functional Score (AKSS-O, AKSS-F), range of motion (ROM), Tegner activity score, University of California Los Angeles score (UCLA) and visual analogue scale for pain (VAS). Results: The survival rate was 96.6% at 6.5 years (95% CI 98.7–91.3%; number at risk: 56) and 91.7% (95% CI 96.7–80%; number at risk: 22) at 10 years for the endpoint device related revisions and 91.5% at 6.5 years (95% CI 95.4–84.5%; number at risk: 56) and 86.8% (95% CI 93–76.2%; number at risk: 22) at 10 years for the endpoint revision for any reason. Outcome scores, VAS and ROM showed significant improvements (p < 0.001). The mean OKS increased from 26.7 (standard deviation (sd): 7.2) preoperatively to 40.9 (sd: 7.6) at final follow-up, the mean AKSS-O from 48.3 (sd: 13.3) to 87.8 (sd: 14.4) and the mean ROM from 118° (sd: 16.7) to 125° (sd: 11.4). The radiological analysis revealed progression of degenerative changes in the lateral compartment in 39.6% of patients without affecting the functional outcome. Conclusions: Medial mobile-bearing UKA is a viable surgical treatment option in young patients with significant improvements in knee function and pain. Further follow-up is necessary to evaluate the long-term efficacy. Level of evidence: Retrospective cohort study, Level III. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Higher failure rates of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are seen with lower surgical volume. Surgical techniques that introduce less variability improving implant positioning may lead to improved survivorship. A femur-first (FF) technique has been described, but survivorship data compared to traditional tibia-first (TF) technique are under-reported. We report the results of mobile-bearing UKA using the FF technique compared to the TF technique with emphasis on implant position and survivorship. A total of 430 UKAs were performed by a single surgeon between 2007 and 2020. After 2012, there were 141 consecutive UKAs performed with the FF technique which were compared with 147 consecutive UKAs prior. Mean follow-up was 6 years (range, 2 to 13 years), average age was 63 years (range, 23 to 92 years), and there were 132 women. Postoperative radiographs were reviewed to determine implant positioning. Survivorship analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier curves. The FF resulted in significantly thinner polyethylene (3.4 ± 0.7 mm versus 3.7 ± 0.9 mm) (P =.002) and 4 mm or less bearing thickness in 94% of cases. At 5 years, there was an early trend toward improved survivorship free from component revision (98% for the FF group and 94% for the TF [ P =.35]). The FF cohort had higher Knee Society Functional scores at final follow-up (P <.001). Compared to traditional TF technique, the FF was more bone-preserving and improved radiographic positioning. The FF technique is an alternative method for mobile-bearing UKA and was associated with an improvement in implant survivorship and function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MB-UKA) is an effective treatment for anteromedial knee osteoarthritis. Meticulous intraoperative soft tissue balancing remains challenging yet consequential for a successful operation. Currently, surgeons rely mostly on their experience during soft tissue balancing, yielding unreproducible results. The purpose of this study was to quantified measure the soft tissue tension of medial compartment and determine if an optimal "target" tension values with the natural state exists. Methods This was an observational study of 24 consecutive patients. All 30 UKAs were performed by a single surgeon. The piezoresistive sensor was custom designed to fit in the medial compartment gap. Contact pressures were measured at 5 angular positions of the knee intraoperatively: 0°, 20°, 45°, 90°, and 110° of flexion. The change in pressure from extension (20° position) and flexion (110° position) was also calculated (E-FPD). Data on age, sex, body mass index, operative side, and bearing size were collected. Outcome measures were measured at baseline and at the 6-month postoperative follow-up; Oxford Knee Score, visual analog scale score, and range of motion were compared to evaluate clinical outcomes. Results There was a significant improvement in patients in all measured outcomes at 6 months from baseline (P 0.05). Conclusions Objective data from sensor output may assist surgeons in decreasing loading variability during MB-UKA. The data suggested that MB-UKA could not accurately restore soft tissue tension to the natural state, which was related to the inability of MB-UKA surgical instruments to fine adjust the bone cut and soft tissue release. Study registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( http://www.chictr.org.cn ): ChiCTR1900024146.

Ankle osteoarthritis (OA) represents a significant social burden and is one of the main causes of chronic disability in a rapidly growing part of the world’s population. Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has become increasingly popular despite the poor results obtained with the first dedicated designs. The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the ankle kinematics, in vivo and under weight-bearing conditions, of a TAA through a dynamic model-based radiostereometric analysis (MB-RSA). The clinical evaluation was performed by administering the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle–hindfoot score and Short Form-36 questionnaires. The kinematic evaluation was conducted through MB-RSA during the execution of an open kinetic chain and a closed kinetic chain motor task. Double radiographic images of the ankle joint were processed using dedicated software to obtain a 3D reconstruction of the ankle prosthetic components’ motion. Eighteen patients (five females) completed the clinical and instrumental preoperative and postoperative evaluations (age 59.1 ± 10.3). All clinical scores showed a marked improvement (p < 0.005). During the closed kinetic chain motor tasks, the ankle showed a total range of motion (ROM) in dorsi-plantarflexion of 19.84°. The parameters in varus–valgus were recorded. Physiological motion can be achieved in TAA, characterized by a wide range of motion and coupling of movements on the three planes. The results of the present work may help to understand the real movement of a widespread TAA model and possibly to improve future designs and instrumentation.

Abstract Background Despite numerous scientific investigations, the tribological advantages of mobile bearing inserts have not been sustainably confirmed or refuted for modern knee prostheses in clinical studies. The purpose of this study was to compare fixed and mobile bearing inserts in order to draw conclusions regarding clinical benefits. Methods The present prospective single center cohort study of 2 non-randomized stratified groups consisted of 67 patients. All included patients received cemented total knee arthroplasty (Attune®) due to osteoarthritis. 34 patients were treated with a mobile and 33 patients with a fixed insert. The WOMAC score and the Visual Analogue Scale was used for the subjective assessment of success, while the Knee-Society-Score was used considering the Range of Motion for the objective assessment. The subjective and the clinical scores showed improvements for both compared groups postoperatively at 2 years of minimum follow-up. Results The overall postoperative results of the WOMAC score, the Knee-Society-Score and the Visual Analogue Scale presented no statistically difference between the compared groups (p > 0,05). The postoperative ROM showed a superior improvement of 13.2° ± 18.4° in the mobile-bearing group versus 4.9° ± 18.4° (p = 0.017) in the fixed-bearing group. The flexion of the knee joint was 114° ± 10.1° for the mobile-bearings and 109.2° ± 7.2° for fixed bearings (p = 0.012). Conclusion According to the findings, both inserts showed overall promising postoperative results, in terms of objective as well as subjective parameters, without clinically relevant significant differences, except for ROM, which was superior in the mobile bearing group. The present clinical trial has been registered at the ISRCTN registry with the reverence number ISRCTN15117998 on 04/04/2022.

Abstract Background The choice of mobile bearing (MB) thickness is essential for obtaining successful results after mobile-bearing Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). This study aimed to investigate the effects of a 1-mm difference in bearing thickness on intraoperative MB movement and intraoperative knee kinematics in Oxford UKAs. Methods We prospectively investigated the effects of a 1-mm difference in bearing thickness on intraoperative MB movement and knee kinematics in 25 patients who underwent Oxford UKAs when surgeons didn’t know which bearing thickness to choose with 1-mm difference. A trial tibial component that was scaled every 2 mm was used to measure the intraoperative MB movement, and the tibial internal rotation relative to the femur and the knee varus angle was simultaneously evaluated using the navigation system as the knee kinematics. We separately evaluated sets of two MB thicknesses with 1-mm differences, and we compared the intraoperative parameters at maximum extension; 30º, 45º, 60º, and 90º flexion; and maximum flexion between the thicker MB (thick group) and the thinner MB (thin group). Results The MB in the thin group was located significantly posteriorly at 90º flexion compared with that in the thick group; however, there were no differences at the other flexion angles. There was significantly less tibial internal rotation in the thin group at 90º flexion than that in the thick group; however, there were no differences at the other flexion angles. The knee varus angles in the thick group were significantly smaller than those in the thin group by approximately one degree at all angles other than at 30º and 45º flexion. Conclusion The thicker MB could bring the less posterior MB movement and the more tibial internal rotation at 90º flexion, additionally the valgus correction angle in the thicker MB should be paid attention. These results could help surgeons to decide the thickness of MBs when they wonder the thickness of MB.

Background: The optimal tibial component rotational alignment in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty has not been defined. This study aimed to explore the effect of tibial component rotational alignment on the clinical outcomes of UKA. Methods: Clinical and follow-up data from 269 patients were retrospectively analysed. They were assigned into Groups A (− 5° to 0°), B (0°–3°), C (3°–6°) and D (> 6°) according to the external rotation of the tibial component to Akagi's line. The Knee Society Score clinical (KSS-c), Knee Society Score function (KSS-f), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and postoperative complications at 2 years postsurgically were analysed. Results: The mean rotation of the tibial component relative to Akagi's line in 269 patients was 4.56 ± 3.79°. There were 15, 84, 89 and 81 patients in Groups A, B, C and D, respectively. The postoperative KSS-c and KSS-f in Groups B and C were significantly higher than those in Group D. No significant differences in KSS-c and KSS-f were detected between Groups B and C. The postoperative FJS in Group B was significantly higher than that in Group C, which was significantly higher in Group C than in Group D. There were 5, 8 and 15 cases of postoperative knee pain in Groups B, C and D, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: Tibial component rotational alignment is of significance to Oxford Phase III UKA in patients. External rotation of the tibial component by 0°–3° is optimal to achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty (TAA) surgery due to TAA aseptic loosening is increasing. It is possible to exchange the talar component and inlay to another system for isolated talar component loosening in a primary mobile-bearing TAA: Hybrid-Total Ankle Arthroplasty (H-TAA). The purpose of this study was to analyze the results of the revision surgery of an isolated aseptic talar component loosening in a mobile-bearing three-component TAA with a H-TAA solution. Methods: In this prospective case study, nine patients (six women, three men; mean age 59.8 years; range 41–80 years) with symptomatic isolated aseptic loosening of the talar component of a mobile-bearing TAA were treated with an isolated talar component and inlay substitution. In all nine cases, a hybrid TAA revision surgery was performed by implanting a VANTAGE TAA talar and insert component (Flatcut talar component: six cases, standard talar component: three cases). The patients were reviewed with the pain score (VAS Pain Score 0–10), Dorsiflexion/Plantarflexion (DF/PF) Range of Motion (ROM; degrees), the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle/Hindfoot Score (0–100 points), Sports Frequency Score (Level 0–4), and subjective Patients' Satisfaction Score (0–10 points). Results: The average Pain score improved significantly from preoperative 6.7 points to postoperative 1.1 points (p < 0.001). Average Dorsiflexion/Plantarflexion ROM values increased significantly post-surgery: 21.7° preoperative to 45.6° postoperative (p < 0.001). The postoperative AOFAS scores were significantly greater than the preoperative values: 47.7 points preoperative, 92.3 points postoperative (p < 0.001). The sports activity improved from preoperative to postoperative where, preoperative, none of the patients were able to perform sports. Postoperative, eight patients were able to be sports-active again. The overall average postoperative level of sports activity was 1.4. The postoperative average patient's satisfaction was 9.3 points. Conclusions: In painful talar component aseptic loosening of a three-component mobile-bearing TAA, H-TAA is a good surgical solution for reducing pain, restoring ankle function, and improving patients' life quality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: In Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (OUKA), the flexion and extension gaps should be adjusted to prevent mobile-bearing dislocation. The extension gap is recommended to be evaluated in the 20° flexion position to avoid underestimation due to tension of the posterior capsule. However, we have become aware of a looser gap in full extension than in 20° flexion in some instances. Materials and methods: We retrospectively investigated 83 knees in 60 patients who underwent OUKA between January and June 2020. During surgery, the extension gaps were measured in both full extension and 20° flexion. The knees were classified into two groups: the gap was looser in full extension (0° group), and the gap was equal or looser in 20° flexion than in full extension (20° group). The hip–knee–ankle angle (HKAA), the lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), the medial proximal tibia angle (MPTA), the posterior tibial slope angle (PTSA), and the last spigot size were also measured and compared between the groups. Results: There was looseness in approximately 41% of knees (34 out of 83 knees) in full extension. In the knees in the 0° group, the last spigot size was significantly smaller (median 1 and 2, P < 0.01). However, there were no significant differences in the HKAA, MPTA, LDFA or PTSA between the groups. Conclusions: Approximately 41% of knees have a looser gap in full extension than in 20° flexion after OUKA. Further investigation is needed to better understand which extension gap should be used in such cases, and to find the contributing factors in loose full extension gap other than the size of the last spigot. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The objective of this article is to describe for the first time a case of 90° spin out of a mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) polyethylene insert. In this report, we present a 57-year-old gentleman with a medial compartment UKA for osteoarthritis in 2017 who developed dislodgement and 90° rotation subsequent to traumatic injury when he was involved in a bus crash and impacted the anterolateral knee sustaining a valgus type injury 1 week postoperatively. Following the injury, he reported medial knee pain and a sensation of something moving within the joint. He was initially managed conservatively and progressed to full weight bearing; however, he experienced intermittent symptoms of catching and blocking of the joint, as well as medial knee swelling, that inhibited his ability to perform activities involving walking, kneeling, or pivoting. Imaging taken in 2018 show a 90° rotation of the polyethylene insert. These images showed the longitudinal metallic marker on the insert facing in an anteroposterior direction as opposed to the normal medial-lateral orientation. Failing conservative management, he presented to our clinic in 2019 and proceeded for revision of his UKA. Intraoperatively, his insert was reviewed and seen to easily spin on axis. The liner was therefore removed and upsized from a size 5 medium to a size 7 medium insert which provided excellent stability and stopped any further spinning. He has done tremendously well since the operation and reports full range of motion and no concerns. In patients with a history of pain, swelling, or locking following a UKA, it would be prudent to consider insert spinning, as well as the more common dislocation, through confirming the orientation of the metallic insert marker. Revision surgery to correct the spinning defect has proven effective with good resolution of symptoms and return to full range of motion.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the changes in patellar heights by comparing standardised pre- and post-operative radiographs in a consecutive series of patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) with two different approaches and implant designs [fixed bearing (FB) vs mobile bearing (MB)] and to correlate the patellar heights with clinical outcomes. Methods: One hundred and seventy-two UKA patients were prospectively enrolled in the study. 75 patients underwent a minimally invasive FB medial UKA (referred to hereinafter as the 'FB group'); 97 patients were treated with a minimally invasive MB medial UKA. The pre-operative and mid-term (1-year) post-operative patellar heights and clinical scores of these groups of patients were compared using the Insall–Salvati (IS) and Caton–Deschamps (CD) indices and the Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Results: No differences were found between the two groups either with regard to the pre-operative data (p > 0.05) or between pre- and post-operative radiographic scores at the time of each follow-up (p > 0.05). Both the groups reported a significant clinical improvement (p<0.05) as did all the sub-groups (p < 0.05). In the MB group, a higher CD index in females was found at the final follow-up stage (p = 0.043) and a higher pre-operative CD index was found in patients with BMI ≥ 28 (p = 0.040). A statistically negative correlation was found between the pre-operative OKS and pre-operative IS index (rho=− 0.165; p=0.031). Conclusions: Both FB and MB arthroplastys with different surgical approaches did not change the patellar height regardless of the age, gender and BMI at short-medium-term follow-up. The post-operative patellar height seems not to be correlated with the clinical outcomes. A higher pre-operative IS index was correlated with knee pain and function. Level of evidence: Level II—prospective comparative study. Study registration: Researchregistry6433–www.researchregistry.com. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aim of this study is to report long-term survival and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of the uncemented low contact stress total knee system and explore the potential association between prior knee surgery and outcomes.Methods: A total of 1,289 procedures in 1,068 patients performed between 2000 and 2010 (mean follow-up 11.1 years) were retrospectively identified. All patients received an uncemented, mobile bearing, anterior stabilized (cruciate sacrificing) knee implant with a porous coating on the bone-prosthesis surface. Implant survival was calculated using competing risk analyses at 5, 10, and 15 years. PROMs include the Oxford Knee Score, Knee Society Score (domain function), EuroQol 5D-3L, and Numeric Rating Scale for pain during rest and activity, and for overall satisfaction. The association between previous surgery (no surgery versus meniscectomy versus arthroscopy versus corrective osteotomies) and implant survival was assessed with multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis; the association with PROMs was assessed with multivariable linear regression analyses.Results: Survival after 5, 10, and 15 years was 97.0% (95% CI 96.0-98.0), 96.3% (95% CI 95.3-97.3), and 96.0% (95% CI 94.8-97.2), respectively. The most common reason for revision was aseptic loosening of the tibial tray (23/49 revisions, 47%). All PROMs were comparable with the reference values of the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. History of knee surgery prior to TKA was not associated with survival or PROMs.Conclusion: The low contact stress uncemented mobile bearing knee implant provides excellent survival and patient satisfaction in our cohort. Previous surgery does not seem to compromise results in our population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Bearing dislocation is the main complication after mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to analyze the potential risk factors of bearing dislocation after Oxford phase III mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in Chinese patients. Methods We retrospectively investigated 492 patients (578 knees) who underwent Oxford phase III mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in our institution between February 2009 and June 2019. The patients were divided into two groups based on surgeons’ annual surgical volume. Those with/ without bearing dislocation were compared based on patient, surgeon and implant factors. Results Among the 492 patients, 21 (4.3%, 4 men and 17 women) experienced bearing dislocation. Of these, 14 (4.0%) were in the high surgical volume group and 7 (5.1%) were in the low surgical volume group. Multivariate analysis revealed that trauma to the operated leg and daily life involving high knee flexion cumulatively predicted bearing dislocation (p

Abstract Background It remains uncertain whether an increase in the tibial slope leads to better flexion in posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee prostheses. Purpose To compare the intra-operative flexion angle between standard and an additional 10° posterior slope inserts. Patients and methods Between December 2014 and February 2015, 22 patients (25 knees) who underwent PS mobile-bearing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were included. Flexion angles were measured using either standard or specially-made inserts. Differences in flexion angles between the two situations were analyzed to determine the relationship between changes in flexion angle and pre-operative flexion angle or body mass index (BMI), and between intra- and post-operative flexion angle. Results The difference between the average flexion angle of standard inserts and specially-made inserts was not statistically significant. Although the correlations between changes in flexion angle due to insert difference and flexion angle, pre-operative flexion angle or BMI were not significant, there was a positive correlation between intra-operative and post-operative flexion at 2 years. Conclusion The results showed an additional posterior tibial slope by 10° did not affect the intra-operative flexion angle. Surgeons performing PS mobile-bearing TKA do not need to excessively slope the tibial bone cutting to improve the post-operative flexion angle. Level of evidence I, Experimental study.

Background: Mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MB-UKA) is an effective treatment for anteromedial knee osteoarthritis. Meticulous intraoperative soft tissue balancing remains challenging yet consequential for a successful operation. Currently, surgeons rely mostly on their experience during soft tissue balancing, yielding unreproducible results. The purpose of this study was to quantified measure the soft tissue tension of medial compartment and determine if an optimal "target" tension values with the natural state exists. Methods: This was an observational study of 24 consecutive patients. All 30 UKAs were performed by a single surgeon. The piezoresistive sensor was custom designed to fit in the medial compartment gap. Contact pressures were measured at 5 angular positions of the knee intraoperatively: 0°, 20°, 45°, 90°, and 110° of flexion. The change in pressure from extension (20° position) and flexion (110° position) was also calculated (E-FPD). Data on age, sex, body mass index, operative side, and bearing size were collected. Outcome measures were measured at baseline and at the 6-month postoperative follow-up; Oxford Knee Score, visual analog scale score, and range of motion were compared to evaluate clinical outcomes. Results: There was a significant improvement in patients in all measured outcomes at 6 months from baseline (P < 0.05). The E-FPD of 14.9 N (8.9, 24.6) was indicative of appropriate soft tissue balancing throughout the functional range of knee motion. Of 30 knees, 22 were 3-mm bearing and 8 were 4- or 5-mm bearing. The pressure data of the 3-mm bearing group was larger than that of the non-3-mm bearing group for each knee flexion degree, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Objective data from sensor output may assist surgeons in decreasing loading variability during MB-UKA. The data suggested that MB-UKA could not accurately restore soft tissue tension to the natural state, which was related to the inability of MB-UKA surgical instruments to fine adjust the bone cut and soft tissue release. Study registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.chictr.org.cn): ChiCTR1900024146. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Both mobile (MB) and fixed (FB) bearing implants are routinely used for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This meta-analysis compared MB versus FB for TKA in terms of implant positioning, joint function, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), and complications. It was hypothesised that MB performs better than FB implants in primary TKA. Methods: This meta-analysis was conducted according to the 2020 PRISMA statement. In February 2022, the following databases were accessed: Pubmed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Embase. All the randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing mobile versus fixed bearing for primary TKA were considered. Results: Data from 74 RCTs (11,116 procedures) were retrieved. The mean follow-up was 58.8 (7.5 to 315.6) months. The MB group demonstrated greater range of motion (ROM) (P = 0.02), Knee Society Score (KSS) score (P < 0.0001), and rate of deep infections (P = 0.02). No difference was found in implant positioning: tibial slope, delta angle, alpha femoral component angle, gamma femoral component angle, beta tibial component angle, tibiofemoral alignment angle, posterior condylar offset, radiolucent lines. No difference was found in duration of the surgical procedure. No difference was found in the following PROMs: Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), visual analogue scale (VAS), function and pain subscales of the KSS score. No difference was found in the rate of anterior knee pain, revision, aseptic loosening, fractures, and deep vein thrombosis. Conclusion: There is no evidence in support that MB implants promote greater outcomes compared to FB implants in primary TKA. Level of evidence: Level I. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite the fact that the choice of bearing design has been thought to influence the functional outcomes and longevity of unicompartimental knee arthroplasty (UKA), there is a lack of clinical evidence supporting the decision-making process in patients who have undergone high tibial osteotomy (HTO). A systematic review of studies was carried out that reported the outcomes of fixed-bearing (FB) or mobile-bearing (MB) medial UKA in patients with a previous HTO. A random effect meta-analysis using a generalized linear mixed-effects model to calculate revision rates was done. Seven retrospective cohort studies were included for this study. Regarding the fixation method, 40 were the FB-UKA and 47 were MB-UKA. For both groups, the mean post-operative follow-up was 5.8 years. The survival rates were 92% for the FB-UKA with a mean follow-up of 10 years. For the MB-UKA, it ranged from 35.7 to 93%, with a mean follow-up of 4.2 years. For the FB, the time to revision was reported as 9.3 years, while 1.2, 2.5 and 2.91 years was reported for the MB. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the revision rate for the patients receiving a FB-UKA after failed HTO was 8%, compared to 17% in those who received an MB-UKA. The results of the review suggest that the use of the FB-UKA is associated with lower revision rates and a longer survival time than the MB-UKA and have similar functional ability scores. Level of evidence: III (systematic review of level-III studies). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In primary Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), it is still not clear if cemented or uncemented fixation has the best long-term survival. The Low Contact Stress (LCS) mobile-bearing (MB) knee system was introduced in 1977. The aim of this study is to investigate the long-term survival of this design with a minimum of 15-year follow-up. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed, with the primary endpoint for survival defined as revision. Cox regression analysis was performed to assess the association between type of fixation and the risk of revision, while correcting for potential confounders (diagnosis, design, age and sex). Results: 1271 cases were included with inflammatory joint disease (IJD) (657 cases) and non-IJD (614 cases). TKAs were performed cemented in 522 cases and uncemented in 749 cases. A bicruciate retaining design was used in 180 cases, a rotating platform design in 174 cases and an anterior posterior glide posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) design in 916 cases. Cumulative incidence of component revision at 15 years was 2.7% (95% CI 1.6; 4.5) for cemented and 10% (95% CI 8.1; 12.4) for uncemented TKA, respectively. The 20-year cumulative incidence was 2.9% (95% CI 1.7; 4.7) for cemented and 10.9% (95% CI 8.8; 13.4) for uncemented TKA, respectively. Age, non-IJD and PCR design were associated with a significantly higher risk of revision, regardless of the type of fixation. Conclusion: Long-term survival for patients undergoing cemented or uncemented TKA using the LCS MB system revealed lower revision rates for cemented fixation. Revision risk was higher in younger, non-IJD patients who had the PCR design, regardless of the type of fixation. For the LCS MB TKA design, it is recommended to use cemented fixation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background We present two cases of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) bearing failure in this report—one case of bearing dislocation and one case of bearing fracture. The causes of failure in both cases are evaluated in depth and recommendations are provided regarding intraoperative technique to reduce risk of bearing failure in mobile bearing UKAs. Case presentation In the first case, intraoperative evidence of metallosis and chronic pain preceding the traumatic event may indicate that the patient had attenuation of her collateral ligaments that precipitated the instability event. In the second case, the relatively atraumatic nature of the bearing fracture-dislocation and intraoperative evidence of extensive poly wear suggest that the bearing fracture was likely due to a 3-mm bearing selection in the initial surgery. Conclusions This case report shows that late bearing in mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty can often be a multifactorial event and treatment must address all the risk factors that led to bearing dislocation. Bearing fracture is a very rare complication associated with mobile bearing UKA and patients with thin polyethylene inserts are at risk for bearing fracture even in the absence of poly wear.

Abstract Background Dissimilar total knee arthroplasty implant designs offer different functional characteristics. This is the first work in the literature to fully assess the Columbus ultra-congruent mobile (UCR) system with a rotating platform. Methods This is a double-blinded randomised controlled trial, comparing the functional performance of the low congruent fixed (CR DD), ultra-congruent fixed (UC) and UCR Columbus Total Knee Systems. The pre-operative and post-operative functional performance of twenty-four osteoarthritic patients was evaluated against nine control participants when carrying out everyday tasks. Spatiotemporal, kinematic and kinetic gait parameters in walking and stair navigation were extracted by means of motion capture. Results The UC implant provided better post-operative function, closely followed by the UCR design. However, both the UC and UCR groups exhibited restricted post-operative sagittal RoM (walking, 52.1 ± 4.4° and 53.2 ± 6.6°, respectively), whilst patients receiving a UCR implant did not show an improvement in their tibiofemoral axial rotation despite the bearing’s mobile design (walking, CR DD 13.2 ± 4.6°, UC 15.3 ± 6.7°, UCR 13.5 ± 5.4°). Patients with a CR DD fixed bearing showed a statistically significant post-operative improvement in their sagittal RoM when walking (56.8 ± 4.6°). Conclusion It was concluded that both ultra-congruent designs in this study, the UC and UCR bearings, showed comparable functional performance and improvement after TKA surgery. The CR DD group showed the most prominent improvement in the sagittal RoM during walking. Trial registration The study is registered under the clinical trial registration number: NCT02422251 . Registered on April 21, 2015.

Introduction: Whether mobile-bearing (MB) unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) performs better than fixed-bearing (FB) implants in patients with monocompartmental osteoarthritis (OA) still remains unclear. Therefore, a meta-analysis comparing MB versus FB for UKA was conducted to investigate the possible advantages of MB versus FB in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), range of motion (ROM), and complications. We hypothesised that the MB design performs better than FB. Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. In December 2021, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Embase were accessed, with no time constraints. All the clinical investigations comparing MB versus FB bearing for UKA were accessed. Only studies published in peer-reviewed journals were considered. Studies reporting data on revision settings were excluded, as were those combining unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty. Results: Data from 25 studies (4696 patients) were collected; 58% (2724 of 4696 patients) were women. The mean length of follow-up was 45.8 ± 43.2. The mean age of the patients was 65.0 ± 5.6 years. No difference was found in range of motion (p = 0.05), Knee Scoring System (p = 0.9), function subscale (p = 0.2), and Oxford Knee Score (p = 0.4). No difference was found in the rate of revision (p = 0.2), aseptic loosening (p = 0.9), deep infections (p = 0.99), fractures (p = 0.6), and further extension of OA to the contralateral joint compartment (p = 0.2). Conclusion: The present meta-analysis failed to identify the possible superiority of the MB implants over the FB for UKA in patients with monocompartmental knee osteoarthritis. Long observational investigations are required to evaluate possible long-term complications and implant survivorship. These results should be interpreted within the limitations of the present study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Bearing dislocation is a serious complication after Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Bearing separation from the lateral wall can cause it to spin (90° horizontal rotation) and eventually dislocate because there is just a 2 mm difference in height in both the lateral and medial sides from the bottom of the bearing, compared with the anterior (5 mm) and posterior (3 mm) sides. The details of this problem have not been previously examined.Methods: Twenty-one dislocations in 12 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Bearing separation was defined as the bearing position being sufficiently distant from the lateral wall of the tibial component to allow spinning. We analyzed the incidence of separation, the direction and the recurrence of the dislocations, and their causes and treatments.Results: Five of the 12 patients had separation. Of the total of 21 dislocations, 11 occurred in cases of separation (52%). Seven of 11 anterior dislocations were found to have separation, whereas nine of 13 posterior dislocations occurred without separation (P = .0237). Three of 5 patients with separation had recurrence of dislocation, and eventually 2 underwent revision to fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.Conclusion: Bearing separation from the lateral wall of the tibial component can cause bearing dislocation, especially in an anterior direction. To prevent separation, the wall-bearing distance should be evaluated before the keel slot preparation, with manipulation as necessary. Conversely, posterior dislocation was predominant in our nonseparation cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite numerous scientific investigations, the tribological advantages of mobile bearing inserts have not been sustainably confirmed or refuted for modern knee prostheses in clinical studies. The purpose of this study was to compare fixed and mobile bearing inserts in order to draw conclusions regarding clinical benefits.Methods: The present prospective single center cohort study of 2 non-randomized stratified groups consisted of 67 patients. All included patients received cemented total knee arthroplasty (Attune®) due to osteoarthritis. 34 patients were treated with a mobile and 33 patients with a fixed insert. The WOMAC score and the Visual Analogue Scale was used for the subjective assessment of success, while the Knee-Society-Score was used considering the Range of Motion for the objective assessment. The subjective and the clinical scores showed improvements for both compared groups postoperatively at 2 years of minimum follow-up.Results: The overall postoperative results of the WOMAC score, the Knee-Society-Score and the Visual Analogue Scale presented no statistically difference between the compared groups (p > 0,05). The postoperative ROM showed a superior improvement of 13.2° ± 18.4° in the mobile-bearing group versus 4.9° ± 18.4° (p = 0.017) in the fixed-bearing group. The flexion of the knee joint was 114° ± 10.1° for the mobile-bearings and 109.2° ± 7.2° for fixed bearings (p = 0.012).Conclusion: According to the findings, both inserts showed overall promising postoperative results, in terms of objective as well as subjective parameters, without clinically relevant significant differences, except for ROM, which was superior in the mobile bearing group. The present clinical trial has been registered at the ISRCTN registry with the reverence number ISRCTN15117998 on 04/04/2022. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]