Search

Volitional movement requires descending input from the motor cortex and sensory feedback through the spinal cord. We previously developed a paired brain and spinal electrical stimulation approach in rats that relies on convergence of the descending motor and spinal sensory stimuli in the cervical cord. This approach strengthened sensorimotor circuits and improved volitional movement through associative plasticity. In humans, it is not known whether posterior epidural spinal cord stimulation targeted at the sensorimotor interface or anterior epidural spinal cord stimulation targeted within the motor system is effective at facilitating brain evoked responses. In 59 individuals undergoing elective cervical spine decompression surgery, the motor cortex was stimulated with scalp electrodes and the spinal cord was stimulated with epidural electrodes, with muscle responses being recorded in arm and leg muscles. Spinal electrodes were placed either posteriorly or anteriorly, and the interval between cortex and spinal cord stimulation was varied. Pairing stimulation between the motor cortex and spinal sensory (posterior) but not spinal motor (anterior) stimulation produced motor evoked potentials that were over five times larger than brain stimulation alone. This strong augmentation occurred only when descending motor and spinal afferent stimuli were timed to converge in the spinal cord. Paired stimulation also increased the selectivity of muscle responses relative to unpaired brain or spinal cord stimulation. Finally, clinical signs suggest that facilitation was observed in both injured and uninjured segments of the spinal cord. The large effect size of this paired stimulation makes it a promising candidate for therapeutic neuromodulation. Key points: Pairs of stimuli designed to alter nervous system function typically target the motor system, or one targets the sensory system and the other targets the motor system for convergence in cortex.In humans undergoing clinically indicated surgery, we tested paired brain and spinal cord stimulation that we developed in rats aiming to target sensorimotor convergence in the cervical cord.Arm and hand muscle responses to paired sensorimotor stimulation were more than five times larger than brain or spinal cord stimulation alone when applied to the posterior but not anterior spinal cord.Arm and hand muscle responses to paired stimulation were more selective for targeted muscles than the brain‐ or spinal‐only conditions, especially at latencies that produced the strongest effects of paired stimulation.Measures of clinical evidence of compression were only weakly related to the paired stimulation effect, suggesting that it could be applied as therapy in people affected by disorders of the central nervous system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives/hypothesis: Upper airway stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) via implantable hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) reduces airway obstruction by selectively stimulating nerve fibers that innervate muscles that produce tongue protrusion, while avoiding fibers that produce tongue retraction. This selective stimulation likely depends upon the location, intensity, and type of electrical stimulation delivered. This study investigates the impact of changing stimulation parameters on tongue muscle activation during HGNS using intraoperative nerve integrity monitoring in conjunction with electromyography (EMG).Study Design: Prospective case series.Methods: Ten patients undergoing unilateral HGNS implantation for OSA in a university hospital setting were studied. Data included EMG responses in tongue muscles that produce protrusion (genioglossus), retraction (styloglossus/hyoglossus), and stiffening (transverse/vertical) in response to intraoperative bipolar probe electrical stimulation of lateral and medial branches of the hypoglossal nerve (HGN) and to implantable pulse generator (IPG) unipolar and bipolar settings after placement of the stimulation cuff.Results: Stimulation of medial division HGN branches resulted in EMG responses in genioglossus muscles, but not in styloglossus/hyoglossus muscles, whereas stimulation of the lateral division HGN branches drove responses in styloglossus/hyoglossus muscles. Variable responses in transverse/vertical muscles were observed with stimulation of lateral and medial division branches. After electrode cuff placement, unipolar and bipolar HGN stimulation configurations of IPG resulted in unique patterns of muscle activation.Conclusions: The relative activation of extrinsic and intrinsic tongue musculature by HGNS is determined by stimulus location, intensity, and type. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of tongue muscle activation enables proper electrode cuff placement and may provide essential data for stimulus optimization.Level Of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 130:1836-1843, 2020. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Objectives: Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) is an effective alternative treatment for obstructive sleep apnea that acts by opening the airway via selective stimulation of nerve fibers that innervate tongue muscles that protrude (genioglossus) and stiffen the tongue (transverse and vertical) while avoiding nerve fibers that innervate tongue muscles that retract the tongue (styloglossus and hyoglossus). There remains a subset of postoperative patients who fail to adequately respond to HGNS, in some cases due to mixed activation of muscles that simultaneously protrude and retract the tongue. This study aims to characterize the relationship between neurophysiological data from individual tongue muscle activation during intraoperative electromyographic recordings and postoperative apnea-hypopnea index responses to HGNS., Methods: A single-institution review of 46 patients undergoing unilateral HGNS implantation for obstructive sleep apnea. Patients were separated into responders and nonresponders through comparison of pre and postoperative apnea-hypopnea index. Neurophysiological data included electromyographic responses of the genioglossus, styloglossus/hyoglossus, intrinsic/vertical, and hyoglossus (neck) muscles to intraoperative stimulation using unipolar (- to - and o to o) and bipolar (+ to +) settings., Results: The overall treatment success rate was 61% as determined by a postoperative apnea-hypopnea index < 20 events/h with a greater than 50% AHI reduction. We observed no statistically significant relationships between treatment response and individual muscle responses. However, we did note that increasing body mass index was correlated with worse postoperative responses., Conclusions: Although we noted a significant subgroup of clinical nonresponders to HGNS postoperatively, these patients were not found to exhibit significant inclusion of tongue retractors intraoperatively on neurophysiological analysis. Further research is needed to delineate additional phenotypic factors that may contribute to HGNS treatment responses., Citation: Wang D, Modik O, Sturm JJ, et al. Neurophysiological profiles of responders and nonresponders to hypoglossal nerve stimulation: a single-institution study. J Clin Sleep Med . 2022;18(5):1327-1333., (© 2022 American Academy of Sleep Medicine.)