Search

Abstract Chemotherapy detrimentally impacts fertility via depletion of follicular reserves in the ovaries leading to ovarian failure (OF) and development of estrogen deficiency-related complications. The currently proposed options to preserve fertility such as Oocyte or ovarian cortex cryopreservation are faced with many technical obstacles that limit their effective implementation. Therefore, developing new modalities to protect ovarian function remains a pending target. Exosomes are nano-sized cell-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) with documented efficacy in the field of regenerative medicine. The current study sought to determine the potential beneficial effects of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)-derived EVs in experimentally induced OF. Female albino rats were randomly allocated to four groups: control, OF group, OF + MSCs-EVs group, OF + Rapamycin (mTOR inhibitor) group, and OF + Quercetin (PI3K/AKT inhibitor) group. Follicular development was assessed via histopathological and immunohistochemical examination, and ovarian function was evaluated by hormonal assay. PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway as a key modulator of ovarian follicular activation was also assessed. MSCs-EVs administration to OF rats resulted in restored serum hormonal levels, preserved primordial follicles and oocytes, suppressed ovarian PI3K/AKT axis and downstream effectors (mTOR and FOXO3), modulated miRNA that target this axis, decreased expression of ovarian apoptotic markers (BAX, BCl2) and increased expression of proliferation marker Ki67. The present study validated the effectiveness of MSCs-EVs therapy in preventing ovarian insufficiency induced by chemotherapy. Concomitant MSCs-EVs treatment during chemotherapy could significantly preserve ovarian function and fertility by suppressing the PI3K/Akt axis, preventing follicular overactivation, maintaining normal ovarian cellular proliferation, and inhibiting granulosa cell apoptosis.

Stem cell transplantation has recently demonstrated a significant therapeutic efficacy in various diseases. Multilineage-differentiating stress-enduring (Muse) cells are stress-tolerant endogenous pluripotent stem cells that were first reported in 2010. Muse cells can be found in the peripheral blood, bone marrow and connective tissue of nearly all body organs. Under basal conditions, they constantly move from the bone marrow to peripheral blood to supply various body organs. However, this rate greatly changes even within the same individual based on physical status and the presence of injury or illness. Muse cells can differentiate into all three-germ-layers, producing tissue-compatible cells with few errors, minimal immune rejection and without forming teratomas. They can also endure hostile environments, supporting their survival in damaged/injured tissues. Additionally, Muse cells express receptors for sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), which is a protein produced by damaged/injured tissues. Through the S1P–S1PR2 axis, circulating Muse cells can preferentially migrate to damaged sites following transplantation. In addition, Muse cells possess a unique immune privilege system, facilitating their use without the need for long-term immunosuppressant treatment or human leucocyte antigen matching. Moreover, they exhibit anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic and tissue-protective effects. These characteristics circumvent all challenges experienced with mesenchymal stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells and encourage the wide application of Muse cells in clinical practice. Indeed, Muse cells have the potential to break through the limitations of current cell-based therapies, and many clinical trials have been conducted, applying intravenously administered Muse cells in stroke, myocardial infarction, neurological disorders and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) related to novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Herein, we aim to highlight the unique biological properties of Muse cells and to elucidate the advantageous difference between Muse cells and other types of stem cells. Finally, we shed light on their current therapeutic applications and the major obstacles to their clinical implementation from laboratory to clinic.