Search

e19379 Background: Oncology Division of Michigan Health Professionals (MHP) participates in OCM, which requires effort from all MHP OCM providers to coordinate care at same or lower cost to Medicare. Palliative Care, Care Management, and End of Life Care programs established by MHP, in collaboration with Premiere Hospice and Integra Connect, have shown cost and quality benefits in the OCM patients. Quality improvement initiatives included monthly OCM provider meetings to review OCM results, identify cost & quality opportunities, and to design training and education sessions. In order to assess the impact of such a concerted initiative, this study aims to evaluate MHP OCM provider impact in OCM total cost of care relative to historical period. Methods: Retrospective review of reconciliation results provided by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) for OCM performance periods 1-4 (pp1-4). Total cost of care (ACTUAL) and cost categories were the summarized and adjusted expenditures during 6-month OCM period as reported by CMMI. ACTUAL and cost category experience was compared by OCM performance period to the trended-mean of matched historical OCM-eligible patients (Baseline Episodes from CMMI). Patients were matched by cancer type, comorbidity count, age group, radiation, surgery, and low-intensity/-risk cancer sub-type for prostate, bladder and breast cancers. Results: The largest pp1-4 cost category reductions were acute inpatient ($2.2M), physician services excluding drug-cost, imaging and labs ($1.2M), skilled nursing facility ($0.5M), ancillary which consists of imaging and lab ($0.5M), inpatient rehab ($0.3M), home health agency ($0.3M), radiation oncology ($0.1M). The largest pp1-4 increase in OCM expense relative to historical was Part D Drugs ($1.7M). Conclusions: MHP decreased non-drug costs by $5.1M compared to historical cost for matched patients. OCM costs were lower in facility (hospital and SNF) and physician sites of care. Drug costs increased by $1.7M. Study was limited by OCM claims available as of December 2019. Results may be refreshed as more data becomes available. [Table: see text]

12094 Background: Oncology Division of Michigan Health Professionals (MHP) participates in OCM. A comprehensive community oncology program for early and timely involvement of palliative care (PC) was launched in September 2017 to help achieve the OCM program goals of high-quality, cost-effective, coordinated care. PC provides a single point of care for all-cause pain management. PC program included pre-program training and continuous education for early and timely involvement of PC. This study aims to assess the educative effect of PC to reduce pain-related inpatient admissions (Pain IP) in all MHP OCM patients, irrespective of PC-referral. Methods: This initiative was led by palliative care physicians and included continuous education and reinforcement of the benefits, every 2-4 weeks, by sharing PC outcomes data with MHP physicians. Physician feedback was part of the program enhancements that were regularly reviewed during monthly MHP physician meetings. Retrospective claims review was performed with OCM episodes from Oct 2016 – Mar 2019. Monthly Pain IP utilization (based on diagnosis code) per 1000 OCM patients (UPK) was analyzed within pre- and post- PC Program start (Sep 2017). Cost per Pain IP included mean of 30-day follow-up skilled nursing facility (SNF) stay and 30-day outpatient facility expenses. Monthly historical Pain IP (pre-PC UPK) was compared to post-PC Pain IP UPK to calculate OCM savings from PC education at MHP. Results: Pain IP peaked at 7.12 UPK in September 2017 when PC program training and education started, then fell as low as 0.87 UPK in January 2019. Unit cost per Pain IP was $12,473. Post-PC (Sep 2017 – Mar 2019), there were 40 fewer Pain IP admissions compared to Pre-PC Pain IP for a total cost savings of $498,920. Conclusions: After PC Program, Pain IP decreased in MHP OCM population (PC-referred and PC not referred). This trend suggests PC training and continuous education for OCM providers is reducing IP utilization. This also translated to a significant cost saving for OCM/Medicare of $498,920. Study was limited by OCM claims available as of December 2019. Results may be refreshed as more data becomes available.

Purpose To update guideline recommendations on the role of bone-modifying agents in multiple myeloma. Methods An update panel conducted a targeted systematic literature review by searching PubMed and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, clinical practice guidelines, and observational studies. Results Thirty-five relevant studies were identified, and updated evidence supports the current recommendations. Recommendations For patients with active symptomatic multiple myeloma that requires systemic therapy with or without evidence of lytic destruction of bone or compression fracture of the spine from osteopenia on plain radiograph(s) or other imaging studies, intravenous administration of pamidronate 90 mg over at least 2 hours or zoledronic acid 4 mg over at least 15 minutes every 3 to 4 weeks is recommended. Denosumab has shown to be noninferior to zoledronic acid for the prevention of skeletal-related events and provides an alternative. Fewer adverse events related to renal toxicity have been noted with denosumab compared with zoledronic acid and may be preferred in this setting. The update panel recommends that clinicians consider reducing the initial pamidronate dose in patients with preexisting renal impairment. Zoledronic acid has not been studied in patients with severe renal impairment and is not recommended in this setting. The update panel suggests that bone-modifying treatment continue for up to 2 years. Less frequent dosing has been evaluated and should be considered in patients with responsive or stable disease. Continuous use is at the discretion of the treating physician and the risk of ongoing skeletal morbidity. Retreatment should be initiated at the time of disease relapse. The update panel discusses measures regarding osteonecrosis of the jaw. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/hematologic-malignancies-guidelines and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) is a transformational event for health care in the United States, with multiple impacts on health care, the economy, and society. Oncologists and other health care providers are already experiencing many changes—direct and indirect, anticipated and unanticipated. A distinguished and diverse panel assembled at the NCCN 19th Annual Conference to discuss the early phase of implementation of the ACA. The roundtable touched on early successes and stumbling blocks; the impact of the ACA on contemporary oncology practice and the new risk pool facing providers, payers, and patients; and some of the current and future challenges that lie ahead for all.

Purpose This guideline presents screening, assessment, and treatment approaches for the management of adult cancer survivors who are experiencing symptoms of fatigue after completion of primary treatment. Methods A systematic search of clinical practice guideline databases, guideline developer Web sites, and published health literature identified the pan-Canadian guideline on screening, assessment, and care of cancer-related fatigue in adults with cancer, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines In Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Cancer-Related Fatigue and the NCCN Guidelines for Survivorship. These three guidelines were appraised and selected for adaptation. Results It is recommended that all patients with cancer be evaluated for the presence of fatigue after completion of primary treatment and be offered specific information and strategies for fatigue management. For those who report moderate to severe fatigue, comprehensive assessment should be conducted, and medical and treatable contributing factors should be addressed. In terms of treatment strategies, evidence indicates that physical activity interventions, psychosocial interventions, and mind-body interventions may reduce cancer-related fatigue in post-treatment patients. There is limited evidence for use of psychostimulants in the management of fatigue in patients who are disease free after active treatment. Conclusion Fatigue is prevalent in cancer survivors and often causes significant disruption in functioning and quality of life. Regular screening, assessment, and education and appropriate treatment of fatigue are important in managing this distressing symptom. Given the multiple factors contributing to post-treatment fatigue, interventions should be tailored to each patient's specific needs. In particular, a number of nonpharmacologic treatment approaches have demonstrated efficacy in cancer survivors.

Article abstract-A 53-year-old woman began taking felbamate for uncontrolled complex partial seizures. Four months later, she developed fatigue and ecchymotic skin lesions. Laboratory studies revealed very severe aplastic anemia. There have been an additional nine reported cases of aplastic anemia in the setting of felbamate treatment. The association between felbamate and aplastic anemia has resulted in a joint recommendation by the US Food and Drug Administration and the manufacturer of felbamate, Carter-Wallace, Inc., for the immediate withdrawal of patients from treatment with felbamate.NEUROLOGY 1995;45: 456-460

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) represents a spectrum of epithelial changes that provide an excellent model for developing chemopreventive interventions for cervical cancer. Possible drug effect surrogate endpoint biomarkers are dependent on the agent under investigation. Published and preliminary clinical reports suggest retinoids and carotenoids are effective chemopreventive agents for CIN. Determination of plasma and tissue pharmacology of these agents and their metabolites could serve as drug effect intermediate endpoints. In addition, retinoic acid receptors could serve a both drug and biological effect intermediate endpoints. Possible biological effect surrogate endpoint biomarkers include cytomorphological parameters, proliferation markers, genomic markers, regulatory markers, and differentiation. Given the demonstrated causality of human papillomavirus (HPV) for cervical cancer, establishing the relationship to HPV will be an essential component of any biological intermediate endpoint biomarker. The pathologic effect surrogate endpoint biomarker for cervical cancer is CIN, used clinically for years. The desired effect for chemopreventive trials is complete regression or prevention progression. In planning chemoprevention trials, investigators need to consider spontaneous regression rates, the subjective nature of detecting CIN, and the impact of biopsy on regression. If intermediate endpoint biomarkers that met the above criteria were available for cervical cancer, then new chemopreventive agents could be rapidly explored. The efficacy of these new agents could be determined with a moderate number of subjects exposed to minimal risk over an acceptable amount of time. The impacts on health care for women would be significant.