Search

Introduction: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is the leading cause of disability in the United States and is associated with a steadily increasing burden of healthcare expenditures. Given this trend, it is essential to evaluate interventions aimed at reducing disability and optimizing healthcare utilization (HCU) in affected populations. This study investigates the impact of prior spinal surgery on functional outcomes and HCU patterns following high-frequency (10 kHz) spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapy. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 160 subjects who underwent implantation of a 10 kHz SCS device. Participants were divided into surgical and non-surgical cohorts for comparative analysis. Pain relief was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), while disability levels were evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). HCU was examined through the frequency of emergency department (ED) visits, outpatient visits for interventional pain procedures, and opioid consumption measured in morphine milliequivalents (MME). Results: No statistically significant differences were observed between the surgical and non-surgical groups regarding pain relief and disability outcomes. Additionally, ED visits and outpatient visits for interventional pain procedures did not show significant differences between the two cohorts. Discussion: This study represents the first comparative analysis of pain, disability, and HCU trends between surgical and non-surgical populations following 10 kHz SCS therapy. The results suggest that prior spinal surgery may not substantially affect the efficacy of 10 kHz SCS therapy in terms of pain relief, disability reduction, or HCU patterns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Osteoarthritis (OA) knee is one of the most common chronic degenerative conditions that imposes clinical and economic burdens on individuals and societies worldwide. Previous studies showed vitamin D levels correlated positively with lean muscle mass and grip strength, implying that vitamin D supplementation may improve muscle health in knee OA subjects. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to compare the effects of vitamin D supplementation on knee muscle strength, physical function, pain, and sarcopenia status in patients with end-stage knee OA. Patients and outcome assessors will be blinded to group allocation. Fifty-six end-stage knee OA patients with vitamin D insufficiency fulfilling our inclusion criteria will be invited to participate in this study. Patients will be randomly assigned to take vitamin D supplementation (4,000 IU capsule daily) or placebo for six months. Measurements will be taken at baseline, three and six-month after the commencement of the vitamin D supplement, and 6-month after the interventional period. The primary outcome includes the isometric quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength measured by a hand-held dynamometer. Secondary outcomes include pain, performance-based and self-reported physical function and sarcopenia status. The success of this study will provide scientific evidence of whether the relatively cheap and well-tolerated vitamin D supplement can improve quadriceps muscle strength, physical function, pain symptoms, and sarcopenia status of this increasingly large population for end-stage knee OA patients. The study has great clinical significance given Hong Kong's lengthy and growing waiting list for complete knee replacement procedures. Trial registration: The trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05981534) on 31st July 2023. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The use of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapy to treat chronic pain continues to rise. Optimal patient selection remains one of the most important factors for SCS success. However, despite increased utilization and the existence of general indications, predicting which patients will benefit from neuromodulation remains one of the main challenges for this therapy. Therefore, this study aims to identify the variables that may correlate with nonresponders to high‐frequency (10 kHz) SCS to distinguish the subset of patients less likely to benefit from this intervention. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective single‐center observational study of patients who underwent 10 kHz SCS implant. Patients were divided into nonresponders and responders groups. Demographic data and clinical outcomes were collected at baseline and statistical analysis was performed for all continuous and categorical variables between the two groups to calculate statistically significant differences. Results: The study population comprised of 237 patients, of which 67.51% were responders and 32.49% were nonresponders. There was a statistically significant difference of high levels of kinesiophobia, high self‐perceived disability, greater pain intensity, and clinically relevant pain catastrophizing at baseline in the nonresponders compared to the responders. A few variables deemed potentially relevant, such as age, gender, history of spinal surgery, diabetes, alcohol use, tobacco use, psychiatric illness, and opioid utilization at baseline were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Our study is the first in the neuromodulation literature to raise awareness to the association of high levels of kinesiophobia preoperatively in nonresponders to 10 kHz SCS therapy. We also found statistically significant differences with greater pain intensity, higher self‐perceived disability, and clinically relevant pain catastrophizing at baseline in the nonresponders relative to responders. It may be appropriate to screen for these factors preoperatively to identify patients who are less likely to respond to SCS. If these modifiable risk factors are present, it might be prudent to consider a pre‐rehabilitation program with pain neuroscience education to address these factors prior to SCS therapy, to enhance successful outcomes in neuromodulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]