Search

Background: The COVID-19 vaccination campaign began in Italy at the end of December 2020, with the primary aim of immunizing healthcare professionals, using the EMA approved mRNA vaccines (Comirnaty® by Pfizer/BioNTech; mRNA-1273 by Moderna) and recombinant adenoviral vaccine (Vaxzevria® by AstraZeneca). The study aimed at evaluating the prevalence and motivations underlying Vaccine Hesitancy, as well as the incidence and type of adverse events associated with COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: Cross-sectional study. Data were collected January 1st to 28th 2021 using a purposely created online self-administered questionnaire from a selected cohort of Italian physicians. Results: Overall, 7,881 questionnaires were analyzed: 6,612 physicians had received one dose, and 1,670 two doses of Comirnaty®; 30 had received one dose of mRNA-1273. Vaccine Hesitancy rate was 3.6%; it correlated with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, diabetes, Adverse Eventss at previous vaccinations and refusal of 2020 flu vaccine, and was mainly motivated by concerns about vaccine Adverse Events. Typical Adverse Events were pain/itching/paresthesia at the inoculation site, followed by headache, fever, fatigue and myalgia/arthralgia occurring more frequently after the second dose (77.8 vs 66.9%; p

BACKGROUND AND AIM: A previously unseen body of scientific knowledge of varying quality has been produced during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. It has proven extremely difficult to navigate for experts and laymen alike, originating a phenomenon described as "Infodemic", a breeding ground for misinformation. This has a potential impact on vaccine hesitancy that must be considered in a situation where efficient vaccination campaigns are of the greatest importance. We aimed at describing the polarization and volumes of Italian language tweets in the months before and after the start of the vaccination campaign in Italy. METHODS: Tweets were sampled in the October 2020-January 2021 period. The characteristics of the dataset were analyzed after manual annotation as Anti-Vax, Pro-Vax and Neutral, which allowed for the definition of a polarity score for each tweet. RESULTS: Based on the annotated tweets, we could identify 29.6% of the 2,538 unique users as anti-Vax and 12.1% as pro-Vax, with a strong disagreement in annotation in 7.1% of the tweets. We observed a change in the proportion of retweets to anti-Vax and pro-Vax messages after the start of the vaccination campaign in Italy. Although the most shared tweets are those of opposite orientation, the most retweeted users are moderately polarized. Conclusions: The disagreement on the manual classification of tweets highlights a potential risk for misinterpretation of tweets among the general population. Our study reinforces the need to focus Public Health's attention on the new social media with the aim of increasing vaccine confidence, especially in the context of the current pandemic.

International audience

EVALUATION OF QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH RESECTION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF THE UPPER OR LOWER LIMB FOR BONE SARCOMAS

INCIDENCE, TREATMENT AND OUTCOME OF INFECTION IN PROSTHETIC RECONSTRUCTIONS OF THE HUMERUS AFTER RESECTION OF BONE TUMORS

INFECTIONS IN SURGERY OF PRIMARY TUMOURS OF THE SACRUM

OSTEOSARCOMA IN PAGET'S DISEASE OF BONE: A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF THE RIZZOLI INSTITUTE EXPERIENCE

TWO STAGE REVISION FOR INFECTION IN MODULAR MEGAPROSTHESES OF THE LOWER LIMB AFTER RESECTION FOR BONE TUMOUR

Osteosarcoma is a common primary bone sarcoma and distal femur its most frequent site. Between 2003 and 2008 at Rizzoli, 66 patients with osteosarcoma of the distal femur had neoadjuvant chemotherapy, resection and reconstruction with modular uncemented mega-prostheses. Series included 37 males and 29 females. Mean follow up was 2 years. To measure “subjective” outcome Karnofsky scale (KPS) was assessed for each patient pre and post-treatment. Also a functional evaluation according to the MSTS system was performed. To find out the current quality of life, a questionnaire on life at work, study and sport before and after treatment was sent to 64 alive patients. Before treatment 7 patients had a Karnofsky index (KI) of 60%, 31 of 50%, 25 of 40% and 3 of 30%. After treatment 19 patients had a Karnofsky index performance of 90%, 28 of 80%, 11 of 70%, 5 of 50% and 1 of 40%. Two patients died of disease. The most represented index of KPS after teatment was “Able to carry on normal activity; minor symptoms”. Poor results were related with amputation (2), knee stiffness (3), infection (2), aseptic loosening (1). After treatment 91% of patients had a KI over 70%, while 89% a KI lower than 50% pre-treatment. MSTS system showed excellent or good results in 85% and fair or poor in 15% of the patients. Average score at MSTS evaluation was 22 (73%). Questionnaires (some still pending) confirm previous analysis. KPS is simple and effective in evaluating quality of life in patients treated for distal femur osteosarcoma. In this study it confirmed the satisfactory MSTS assessed results. It is an easy method, useful and accessible for patients. The reported analysis shows that patients treated for osteosarcoma of the distal femur can have a good quality of life.

Trasformazione sarcomatosa nel morbo di Paget

QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEOSARCOMA OF THE DISTAL FEMUR TREATED WITH CHEMOTHERAPY, RESECTION AND PROSTHETIC RECONSTRUCTION

Purpose of this paper was to review the Rizzoli experience in prosthetic reconstruction of the knee after resection of bone tumors with special attention to major complications and functional outcome. Material: 669 knee modular uncemented prostheses were implanted between 1983 and 2006 after resection of the distal femur, total femur or proximal tibia. These prostheses include 126 first generation Kotz prosthesis (KMFTR) and 543 second generation HMRS prostheses. Methods: All patients are followed periodically in the clinic. Data for this study was obtained from clinical charts; imaging studies were reviewed with special attention to prosthesis related major complications requiring revision surgery. Revision for polyethylene wear was considered a minor complications, since it does not imply change of main prosthetic components, thus failure of the implant. Functional results were assessed according to the MSTS system. Since abrupt data could be misleading due to the oncologic population and related deaths (although 2/3 of the patients were cured or long survivors), to censore the implant unrelated events a statistical analysis of the implant survival was performed and Kaplan-Meyer curves of implant survival were studied. Results: In the 126 KMFTR group major complications included infection 13%, breakage of the stems 12%, aseptic loosening 8.7%, while revision for polyethylene wear rated 45%. In 543 HMRS prostheses major complications were infection 8%, stem breakage 2%, aseptic loosening 4%, while revision for polyethylene wear components rated 7.4%. Techniques of revisions were analyzed, as well as the outcome of revised cases, which showed that about 2/3 of the patients treated for major complications do well, although the risk for further complications is significantly incresed in revised implants. Functional results were evaluated according to the MSTS system: in KMFTR prostheses were good or excellent in 80% of the patients, while in HMRS were good or excellent in 90% of the patients. Discussion: The reduction of major complication rate with the newer designs of the modular prosthesis was statistically significant and this seems to confirm that newer materials and a modified stem design positively affected the implant survival. Also the wear of polyethylene component was dramatically decreased in the newer prosthetic design. Functional results were satisfactory in most of the patients that did not experience major complications, with a trend to improvement in the newer design. Revision surgery is technically demanding and sometimes newer ‘hybrid’ techniques are suggested, implying the use of bone allografts. Appropriate timing of revisions is crucial. An early treatment of complications can improve the final outcome.

Evaluation of quality of life in patients treated with resection and reconstruction of lower limb for bone sarcomas

I Tumori della Mano e del Polso

PROSTHETIC RECONSTRUCTION OF THE HUMERUS AFTER RESECTION OF PRIMARY TUMORS:EXPERIENCE OF THE ISTITUTO RIZZOLI IN 277 CASES

KNEE RECONSTRUCTION WITH MODULAR PROSTHESES AFTER AFTER RESECTION OF BONE TUMORS: FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME AND COMPLICATION AT LONG TERM FOLLOW UP

LONG TERM RESULTS IN KNEE RECOSTRUCTION WITH MODULAR UNCEMENTED PROSTHESES FIXED HINGE AFTER RESECTION OF BONE TUMORS: A COMPARISON OF TWO CONSECUTIVE DESIGNS OF THE SAME SYSTEM.

Background and Objectives: Thromboembolic risk in orthopedic oncology is high due to several factors. The aim of this study was to assess clinically significant thromboembolic disease in 986 patients operated on with a prosthetic reconstruction of the lower limbs after the resection of bone tumors and prophylactically treated with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Methods: Between 1983 and 2006, 986 patients had uncemented megaprostheses after a resection of the lower limbs for bone tumors. Antithromboembolic prophylaxis was always administered with LMWH from the immediate postoperative time until the time of complete weightbearing. Phlebographies and vascular ecodoppler were not performed postoperatively on a regular basis. Patients were followed in the clinic with imaging studies for several years (lower limb CT, MRI, CT of the chest for malignant tumors). The diagnosis of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) was established or excluded on clinical evidence and MRI study. Results: Among the 986 cases treated, only 11 patients (1.1%) showed a major thromboembolic event confirmed clinically and through imaging. One of these patients died with pulmonary embolism a few days after surgery. Two cases of thromboembolism occurred in patients with a vascular bypass. Conclusions: Despite general oncologic and orthopedic factors favoring VTE, the clinical occurrence of this event was extremely low in this series, probably due to a consistent and careful prophylaxis, prolonged until the time of complete weight-bearing

Osteosarcoma in Paget disease of bone: a retrospective analysis of Rizzoli Institute experience

Purpose of this study is to analyze the results of a modular reconstructive tumor prosthesis for the lower limb (GMRS®) with a comparative statistical analysis of primary and secondary implants. Material and methods: From October 2003 to September 2007 at Rizzoli 161 GMRS® prostheses were implanted, most after resection of osteosarcoma (94 cases, 58%). It is a modular system with a rotating hinge mechanism for the knee, cemented and uncemented stems, in titanium and chromium-cobalt-molybdenum, curved and straight-fluted, with or without hydroxyapatite coating. Moreover adaptors are available to revise HMRS® implants. This series includes 88 males and 73 females ranging in age from 9 to 80 years. Sites of reconstruction were 109 distal femurs, 19 proximal femurs, 1 total femur and 32 proximal tibias. There were 149 oncologic and 12 non oncologic diagnoses, including 96 primary reconstructions and 65 revisions after failure of previous implant. A retrospective analysis of imaging and complications was performed and functional results assessed according to MSTS system. Statistical analysis with Kaplan-Meier curves was used to study implant survival. Results: At a mean follow up of 2 yrs. 106 patients are continuously NED, 31 are NED after treatment of one or more local recurrence or metastasis, 7 AWD, 5 DWD. There were 10 major complications: 8 infections (4,7%) (5 in primary and 3 in secondary implants, 2 previously infected) and 2 aseptic loosening (1,2%) (1 each). There were 9 minor complications (4 wound sloughs, 1 stiff joint, 3 disrupted extensor apparatus,1 patellar instability) requiring revision. Comparative statistical analysis of primary and secondary implants survival at major complications shows no statistically significant difference. Functional results were good or excellent in 95% of the evaluated patients, without any poor. Conclusions: Middle term results are promising: good function, very low incidence of major complications, no breakage of implant components. This prosthetic reconstruction is indicated in oncological cases as well as in selected in some non oncological settings, such as challenging revisions of prosthetic failures with massive bone loss or post-radiation non unions or allografts failures. Although a higher incidence of complications was expected in secondary implants, statistical analysis shows similar survival.