Search

Additional file 2. Table S3. Distribution of the TOP 10 ICPC-2 codifications, before and after T82 ICPC-2 codification. N = 266 872. Table S4. Distribution of the TOP 10 ICPC-2 codifications, before and after T82 ICPC-2 codification, in individuals with obesity class I. N = 186 742. Table S5. Distribution of the TOP 10 ICPC-2 codifications, before and after T82 ICPC-2 codification, in individuals with obesity class II. N = 59 510. Table S6. Distribution of the TOP 10 ICPC-2 codifications, before and after T82 ICPC-2 codification, in individuals with obesity class III. N = 20 620.

Additional file 1. Table S1. Distribution of the T82 and Non-T82 individuals for age group, through the data from Microsoft power BI® reports. Table S2. Distribution of the TOP 10 ICPC-2 codifications in individuals with and without T82 ICPC-2 codification, through the data from Microsoft power BI® reports.

Background Previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using an asthma app to support medication management and adherence but failed to compare with other measures currently used in clinical practice. However, in a clinical setting, any additional adherence measurement must be evaluated in the context of both the patient and physician perspectives so that it can also help improve the process of shared decision making. Thus, we aimed to compare different measures of adherence to asthma control inhalers in clinical practice, namely through an app, patient self-report and physician assessment. Methods This study is a secondary analysis of three prospective multicentre observational studies with patients (≥13 years old) with persistent asthma recruited from 61 primary and secondary care centres in Portugal. Patients were invited to use the InspirerMundi app and register their inhaled medication. Adherence was measured by the app as the number of doses taken divided by the number of doses scheduled each day and two time points were considered for analysis: 1-week and 1-month. At baseline, patients and physicians independently assessed adherence to asthma control inhalers during the previous week using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 0–100). Results A total of 193 patients (72% female; median [P25–P75] age 28 [19–41] years old) were included in the analysis. Adherence measured by the app was lower (1 week: 31 [0–71]%; 1 month: 18 [0–48]%) than patient self-report (80 [60–95]) and physician assessment (82 [51–94]) (p 0.05). There was a moderate correlation between patient self-report and physician assessment (ρ = 0.596, p

Este estudo se interessa pela reflexão semiológica de Benveniste. Considerando-se duas de suas obras, Problemas de linguística geral e Últimas aulas no Collège de France (1968 e 1969), retoma-se a discussão que o linguista faz a respeito da noção de signo e da questão semiológica a partir das ideias de Peirce e de Saussure. Objetiva-se, com isso, mostrar não apenas seu posicionamento teórico em relação a esses dois pensadores, mas também como Benveniste encaminha sua própria discussão no campo da semiologia, o que envolve a noção de interpretância da língua elaborada e proposta pelo linguista no final dos anos 1960.

Entrevista com Irène Fenoglio

Entretien avec Irène Fenglio

Este trabalho trata especificamente da dupla significância da língua, ou seja, das noções de semiótico e semântico formuladas por Émile Benveniste nos artigos “A forma e o sentido na linguagem” (1967; 1974) e “Semiologia da língua” (1969; 1974). Objetiva- se, de um lado, discutir a distinção semiótico/semântico (salientando-a em uma perspectiva linguística e outra semiológica) e, de outro, estabelecer uma relação entre o final programático proposto pelo linguista em “Semiologia da língua” e as noções de semiótico e semântico. Para tanto, além dos artigos citados, são mobilizados outros textos de seus Problemas de linguística geral (1966/1995; 1974/1989) em contraponto com a publicação Últimas aulas no Collège de France (1968 e 1969) (2012/2014), obra estabelecida geneticamente a partir de manuscritos do linguista e de seus ouvintes. This study deals specifically with the double significance of language, that is, the notions of semiotics and semantics developed by Émile Benveniste in the articles “Form and Meaning in Language” (1967; 1974) and “Semiology of Language” (1969; 1974). It aims to, on the one hand, discuss the semiotics/semantics distinction (highlighting it from a linguistic and from a semiological perspective) and, on the other hand, to establish a relation between the programmatic ending proposed by the linguist in “Semiology of Language” and the notions of semiotics and semantics. In order to do so, in addition to the 454 Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras da Universidade de Passo Fundo, v. 14, n. 3, p. 444-456, set./dez. 2018 cited articles, other texts of Problems in General Linguistics (1966/1995; 1974/1989) are brought into use in contrast with the publication Dernières Leçons. Collège de France 1968 et 1969 [Last Lectures at Collège de France (1968 and 1969)] (2012/2014), work established genetically, based on manuscripts by the linguist and by his students.

Este trabalho propõe uma discussão de um dos capítulos do livro Le périple structural – Figures et paradigme, publicado em 2008, por Jean-Claude Milner. Trata-se do texto “Benveniste II – Ibat obscurus”, no qual o autor apresenta uma leitura bastante particular do pensamento de Émile Benveniste. Através de uma articulação envolvendo dados biográficos e pensamento do linguista, Milner identifica aspectos relativos a duas questões – a questão judaica, de um lado, e a política, de outro – não comumente apontadas em sua reflexão. Ou seja, o ponto de vista adotado por Milner envolve uma perspectiva metodológica que permite a prospecção teórica, a produção de novas/outras leituras do pensamento do linguista. É essa perspectiva que se objetiva mostrar neste estudo. Para tanto, apresenta-se inicialmente o modo como Milner concebe e organiza seu périplo. Discute-se mais especificamente o capítulo em questão, salientando-se a articulação estabelecida por Milner. E, por fim, apresentam-se algumas considerações a respeito dessa reflexão. This paper proposes a discussion of one of the chapters of the book Le périple structural - Figures et paradigme, published in 2008, by Jean-Claude Milner. It is the text “Benveniste II - Ibat obscurus”, in which the author presents a very particular interpretation of Benveniste's thought. Through a combination of biographical data and the linguist's reasoning, Milner identifies aspects relating to two topics – the Jewish issue, on the one hand, and politics, on the other – not commonly pointed out in his reflection. That is, Milner’s viewpoint involves a methodological perspective that enables theoretical prospecting, the development of new/other interpretations of the linguist's thinking. This study aims to discuss this perspective. To do so, it initially presents the way Milner conceives and organizes his journey. It also discusses the chapter in question more specifically, highlighting the combination established by Milner. Finally, it presents some considerations about this reflection.