Search

As the most important solvent, water has been at the center of interest since the advent of computer simulations. While early molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo simulations had to make use of simple model potentials to describe the atomic interactions, accurate ab initio molecular dynamics simulations relying on the first-principles calculation of the energies and forces have opened the way to predictive simulations of aqueous systems. Still, these simulations are very demanding, which prevents the study of complex systems and their properties. Modern machine learning potentials (MLPs) have now reached a mature state, allowing us to overcome these limitations by combining the high accuracy of electronic structure calculations with the efficiency of empirical force fields. In this Perspective, we give a concise overview about the progress made in the simulation of water and aqueous systems employing MLPs, starting from early work on free molecules and clusters via bulk liquid water to electrolyte solutions and solid–liquid interfaces. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper, we investigate the performance of different machine learning potentials (MLPs) in predicting key thermodynamic properties of water using RPBE + D3. Specifically, we scrutinize kernel-based regression and high-dimensional neural networks trained on a highly accurate dataset consisting of about 1500 structures, as well as a smaller dataset, about half the size, obtained using only on-the-fly learning. This study reveals that despite minor differences between the MLPs, their agreement on observables such as the diffusion constant and pair-correlation functions is excellent, especially for the large training dataset. Variations in the predicted density isobars, albeit somewhat larger, are also acceptable, particularly given the errors inherent to approximate density functional theory. Overall, this study emphasizes the relevance of the database over the fitting method. Finally, this study underscores the limitations of root mean square errors and the need for comprehensive testing, advocating the use of multiple MLPs for enhanced certainty, particularly when simulating complex thermodynamic properties that may not be fully captured by simpler tests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]