Search

Introduction Previous studies show heterogeneity when applying estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) equations to kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). However, research on the impact of transplantation-related characteristics on eGFR equations using creatinine (eGFRcr) compared to cystatin C (eGFRcys) is scarce. Methods We conducted a comprehensive analysis with three eGFRcr equations (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) 2009, European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) 2021, kidney recipient specific-glomerular filtration rate KRS-GFR) 2023), comparing them to two eGFRcys (CKD-EPI 2012 and EKFC 2023) in 596 KTRs. Bland–Altman plots demonstrated relative differences according to different eGFR-stages. Multivariable logistic regression identified transplantation-related characteristics independently associated with smaller or greater differences between eGFRcr and eGFRcys equations. Results 94.3% of the cohort were White individuals. Median eGFR differed as much as 9 ml/min/1.73 m2 between equations. The median relative differences (Q2) were greater (more negative) when comparing the eGFRcr equations to eGFRcys CKD-EPI 2012, than when comparing them to eGFRcys EKFC 2023 (P  < .001). Better average eGFR was associated with smaller mean relative differences in all comparisons but eGFRcr CKD-EPI 2009 with eGFR EKFC 2023 and eGFRcr EKFC 2021 with eGFRcys EKFC 2023. Living kidney donation and belatacept use were independent factors associated with a smaller difference (≥Q3) between eGFRcr and eGFRcys equations, while prednisone use or higher HbA1c were independently associated with a greater difference (≤Q1) between equations. Conclusion Different eGFR-stages, donor, or recipient characteristics, along with immunosuppression such as belatacept or prednisone, contribute to differences between eGFRcr and eGFRcys. These effects need to be considered in the clinical management of KTRs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Despite substantial improvements in short-term kidney allograft survival, median long-term survival remains at a standstill. It is unclear whether and to what extent a transplant centre's post-transplant care influences long-term outcomes. Methods We retrospectively analysed 501 single kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) who underwent transplantation between 2009 and 2018 and did not develop rejection or de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) within the first post-transplant year. After that, KTRs were either followed exclusively every 3 months by the transplant centre (n  = 197) or every 3 months by local nephrologists (n  = 304) with only yearly follow-up by the transplant centre. We analysed kidney allograft outcomes regarding estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline, proteinuria, development of dnDSA and rejection. Results No differences between the two groups were observed in the baseline characteristics and the characteristics at the end of the first post-transplant year (P  > .05). KTRs followed by local nephrologists were comparable to KTRs followed by the transplant centre concerning patient survival (P  = .541), kidney allograft survival (P  = .385), eGFR decline (P  = .488), progression of proteinuria (P  > .05), the development of dnDSA (P  = .335) and T-cell-mediated rejection (P  = .480). KTRs followed by the transplant centre were more likely to undergo indication biopsies in case of allograft dysfunction and dnDSA (P  < .001). Antibody-mediated rejection was diagnosed earlier and more frequently (P  = .059), recurrent glomerulonephritis was diagnosed earlier and more frequently (P  = .026) and immunosuppression was modified earlier and more frequently in response to histological findings (P  = .038). Conclusions Our findings suggest that close collaboration between local nephrologists and the transplant centre ensures good allograft outcomes independent of the caregiver. Greater biopsy activity in the transplant centre allows for earlier diagnosis of allograft dysfunction as the basis for novel treatment options. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Improved understanding and assessment of the complex physiology of volume regulation in haemodialysis (HD) patients are required to improve patient care and reduce mortality associated with fluid overload (FO). Methods We searched for FO-related biomarkers among 184 peptides associated with cardiovascular disease in a cohort of 30 HD patients. First, we assessed the direct impact of HD on the peptides of interest by comparing plasma concentrations before and after treatment. Then, we compared cardiovascular peptide profiles between patients with and without FO as defined by bioimpedance analysis (BIA). The plasma concentration of selected candidate biomarkers for FO was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and correlated with previously described FO-related clinical and laboratory parameters. For validation, results were confirmed in an independent cohort of 144 HD patients. Results We found seven peptides positively [NT-proBNP, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), vascular endothelial growth factor D (VEGFD), tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor 2, growth differentiation factor 15, tumour necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 13B, chitinase-3-like protein 1] and five negatively (leptin, renin, epidermal growth factor receptor, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, myeloblastin) correlated to FO. In addition to natriuretic peptides, VEGFD emerged as third peptide highly correlated with BIA (ρ = 0.619, P < 0.0001). In line with this, VEGFD concentration verified by ELISA correlated with BIA, BNP and soluble CD146 but not with vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGFC). Notably, levels of VEGFD were unrelated to cardiac systolic function (P = 0.63), contrary to BNP (P = 0.0003). Finally, we observed that 1-year all-cause mortality was higher in patients with high BNP (P = 0.0002), FO (defined by BIA, P = 0.04) and high VEGFD (P = 0.02), but not with high VEGFC (P = 0.48). Conclusion VEGFD is a novel FO-related biomarker with unique diagnostic and prognostic properties. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Accurate volume status evaluation and differentiation of cardiac and non-cardiac components of overhydration (OH) are fundaments of optimal haemodialysis (HD) management. Methods This study, by combining bioimpedance measurements, cardiovascular biomarkers and echocardiography, aimed at dissecting OH into its major functional components, and prospectively tested the association between cardiac and non-cardiac components of OH with mortality. In the first part, we validated soluble CD146 (sCD146) as a non-cardiac biomarker of systemic congestion in a cohort of 30 HD patients. In the second part, we performed a prospective 1-year follow-up study in an independent cohort of 144 HD patients. Results sCD146 incrementally increased after the short and long intervals after HD (+53 ng/mL, P = 0.006 and  +91 ng/mL, P < 0.001), correlated with OH as determined by bioimpedance and well-diagnosed OH (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve 0.72, P = 0.005). The prevalence of OH was lower for low-sCD146 and low-BNP patients (B-type natriuretic peptide, 29%) compared with subjects with either one or both biomarkers elevated (65–74%, P < 0.001). Notably, most low-BNP but high-sCD146 subjects were overhydrated. Systolic dysfunction was 2- to 3-fold more prevalent among high-BNP compared with low-BNP patients (44–68% versus 21–23%, chi-square P < 0.001), regardless of sCD146. One-year all-cause mortality was markedly higher in patients with high-BNP (P = 0.001) but not with high-sCD146. In multivariate analysis, systolic dysfunction and BNP, but not OH, were associated with lower survival. Conclusions The combination of BNP and sCD146 dissects OH into functional components of prognostic value. OH in HD patients is associated with higher mortality only if resulting from cardiac dysfunction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]