Search

Objectives The objective of this study was to determine the effect of administration rate on propofol dose for induction of anesthesia and the effect of methadone on this dose. Methods This was a prospective, randomized, blinded clinical study. Forty male cats (mean ± SD age 1.5 ± 0.8 years) were admitted for orchiectomy. Cats were randomly allocated to receive acepromazine (0.05 mg/kg) with either methadone (MET; 0.3 mg/kg) or saline (SAL; 0.03 ml/kg). Each premedication group then received anesthetic induction with propofol at 5 (F) or 1.5 mg/kg/min (S), resulting in the following four groups: MET-F, SAL-F, MET-S and SAL-S. Sedation scores were assigned at 15 and 30 mins after premedication using a simple descriptive scale (SDS) and a visual analog scale (VAS). After assignment of sedation scores, respiratory frequency (fR) was recorded, and anesthetic induction began and was continued until cats lost their palpebral reflexes and jaw tone, and the eye globe rotated ventromedially. The time for induction and the total amount of propofol needed was recorded, and intubation was then performed. After intubation, fR was also recorded. Results SDS and VAS sedation scores were low at 15 and 30 mins after premedication. There was no significant difference in sedation scores by time or between the groups at any time on any scale. The amount of propofol needed to achieve anesthetic induction was 5.3 ± 1.1 mg/kg in group MET-F, which was statistically lower when compared with the other three groups, which demonstrated no difference among them. Conclusions and relevance Premedication with acepromazine and methadone was not able to produce adequate sedation in healthy cats. The slow induction rate is not adequate for use in cats considering that all of the animals demonstrated excitement during anesthetic induction. The fast administration rate was able to produce adequate induction of anesthesia and reduce the amount of propofol needed to achieve intubation only when using methadone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: This study deals with As speciation in white wine. Arsenic species were selectively determined by liquid chromatography–inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (LC–ICP–MS). Separation of As species was performed using an anion exchange column with ammonium phosphate solution (pH 6.00) as mobile phase. Samples of 14 white wine produced in South America were analysed. They were 10-fold diluted in the mobile phase prior to analysis by LC–ICP–MS. Accuracy was evaluated by recovery tests, whereas As species recovery ranged from 95% to 106%. Additionally, the sum of arsenic species concentration found by LC–ICP–MS was in agreement with the total arsenic concentration determined by ICP–MS after sample digestion. Arsenic species detected were arsenite [As(III)], arsenate [As(V)] and dimethylarsinic acid (DMA). As(III) and As(V) were detected in all analysed wine samples and DMA was detected only in wines produced in Argentina. Results for As determination in samples were from 2.9 to 10.3, 8.6 to 17.8, and<0.45 to 1.07μgL−1 for As(III), As(V) and DMA, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]