Search

Simple Summary: This research was conducted to evaluate the impact of ipilimumab treatment in patients with metastatic melanoma when monotherapy with PD-1 inhibitors has failed. In particular, the aim was to evaluate the efficacy of ipilimumab in this setting based on the presence or absence of BRAF or NRAS mutations. The present study could allow us to understand when salvage treatment with ipilimumab would have the best impact, although an analysis on a larger patient cohort would be necessary. Background: When monotherapy with PD-1 inhibitors in metastatic melanoma fails, there are currently no standard second-line choices. In case of the unavailability of clinical trials, ipilimumab represents a possible alternative treatment. Methods: We collected data of 44 patients who received ipilimumab after the failure of PD-1 inhibitors from July 2017 to May 2023 at our Institute. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and post-progression survival (PPS) based on BRAF or NRAS mutation status, sex, and the presence of brain metastases were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox regression was used to evaluate independence in multivariate analysis. The objective response rate (ORR) was estimated based on RECIST 1.1. Results: Among the 44 patients enrolled in this study, 28 BRAF-wildtype, 9 BRAF-mutated, and 7 NRAS-mutated patients were identified. OS analysis showed a significant difference between wildtype and BRAF- or NRAS-mutated patients: 23.2 months vs 5.3 and 4.59, respectively, p = 0.017. The presence of brain metastases and BRAF or NRAS mutation were independent factors for mortality in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: In case of failure to enroll patients in innovative clinical trials, second-line ipilimumab still represents an effective therapy in patients with metastatic wildtype melanoma and in the absence of brain metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Stage III surgically resected melanoma is a disease at high risk of recurrence. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and the target therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors significantly changed the outcome of patients with metastatic melanoma and several studies have also shown their benefit in the adjuvant setting for the delay of recurrence in stage III melanoma patients. Hyperprogression disease was observed as a possible adverse response to immunotherapy in the metastatic setting, suggesting that some patients could face additional risk of progression with ICIs, although no consensus was found for the correct definition of this event. Case presentation: We describe here two cases of rapid multiorgan metastatization during adjuvant immunotherapy in patients with stage III resected melanoma. Even though it would be not accurate to define this syndrome as hyperprogression because of apparent absence of the initial disease in the adjuvant setting, we observed in these two cases the same very rapid progression after first administration of adjuvant ICIs that resulted in death of patients within two months from the starting of treatment. Both patients had NRAS mutated melanoma. Conclusion: There is an urgent need for a better understanding of the causes of these fatal outcomes and for the identification of biomarkers that would allow to select the patients before offering theman adjuvant treatment, reducing the risk of hyperprogression. Fromthese cases, we suggest that it could be useful a particular attention in proposing ICI adjuvant treatment based on the molecular profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

(1) Background: Mucosal melanoma (MM) is a rare tumor, accounting for about 1% of all diagnosed melanomas. The etiology and pathogenesis of this tumor are unknown. It is characterized by an aggressive phenotype with poor prognosis and a low response rate to approved treatments. (2) Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical features, treatments and outcomes of patients diagnosed with MM from different sub-sites (head and neck, gynecological and gastro-intestinal region) between 2013 and 2023 at our Institute. Survival times were estimated with the Kaplan–Meier method. Multivariate Cox regression was used to test the independence of significant factors in univariate analysis. (3) Results: Twenty-five patients were included in this study; the disease was equally distributed among females and males. The median age at diagnosis was 74 years old. The majority had MM originating from the head and neck (56%), particularly from the nasal cavity. BRAF V600 mutations were detected in 16% of the study population, limited to gastro-intestinal and gynecological MM. At diagnosis, at least half the patients (52%) had the disease located also at distant sites. The median overall survival (OS) in the whole study population was 22 months, with a longer OS for patients diagnosed at an early stage (38 months, p < 0.001). Longer OSs were reported for head and neck MM compared to other anatomic regions (0.06). Surgery of the primary tumor and radiotherapy were performed in 64% and 36% of the study population, respectively. Radiotherapy was performed only in head and neck MM. At multivariate analysis, the single factor that showed a reduced hazard ratio for death was radiotherapy. (4) Conclusions: The overall survival of MM from different sub-sites treated at our Italian Institution was 22 months, with better outcomes for early-stage disease and head and neck MM. Performing radiotherapy may have a protective effect on OS for head and neck MM. New treatment strategies are urgently needed to improve the outcome in this disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The term non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) refers to skin cancer different from melanoma, and it is usually restricted to basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and their pre-cancerous lesions, e.g., actinic keratosis. These conditions represent the most frequent tumors in Caucasians and are characterized by an increasing incidence worldwide and a high socio-economic impact. The term Integrated Care Pathway (ICP) refers to "a complex intervention for the mutual decision making and organization of care processes for a well-defined group of patients during a well-defined period". The purpose of this paper is to present a proposal from the Italian Association of Hospital Dermatologists (ADOI) for an ICP organization of care of NMSC, considering the hub-and-spoke model in the different geographical areas. This proposal is based on the most recent literature and on documents from the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM), the European consensus-based interdisciplinary guidelines from the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO), and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). We initially discuss the NMSC outpatient clinic, the role of the multidisciplinary working groups, and the hub-and-spoke model regarding this topic. Then, we define the ICP processes specific for BCC and SCC. The ICP for NMSC is an innovative strategy to guarantee the highest possible quality of health care while the hub-andspoke model is crucial for the organization of different health care structures. Considering the importance on this topic, it is essential to create a valid ICP together with an efficient organization within the different geographical areas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The incidence of non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC) is increasing worldwide and these skin cancers have become an important health issue. An integrated care pathway (ICP) is a multidisciplinary outline of anticipated care, placed in an appropriate timeframe, to help a patient with a specific condition. The aim of this paper is to define the ICP for patients affected by NMSC referring to the Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata - IRCCS of Rome and Villa Paola, Italy. This ICP is multidisciplinary and included various specialists like dermatologist, oncologist, general surgeon, plastic surgeon, anatomopathologist, molecular biologist and epidemiologist. This ICP is based on the most recent acquisitions in the literature, referring in particular to the national (EADO and SIDEMAST) and international guidelines (EDF and NCCN). We firstly valued the current practice for patients affected by NMSC referring to our Institute to define the multidisciplinary process map. This process delineated the activities and the responsibilities performed during delivery of care to the patients and the potential problem areas or opportunities for improvements. Subsequently, we defined the final ICP process. This ICP of NMSC represents an innovative strategy to provide high quality healthcare. This allows to ensure all the necessary procedures for the patient, optimizing the "continuum" of care and the use of health services, and improving the organization of the Institute regarding an important health issue.