Search

Objectives The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic may significantly affect the peripartum experience; however, little is known about the perceptions of women who gave birth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, the purpose of our study was to describe the peripartum experiences of women who gave birth during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Methods Using a cross-sectional design, we collected survey data from a convenience sample of postpartum women recruited through social media. Participants were 18 years of age or older, lived in the United States, gave birth after February 1, 2020, and could read English. This study was part of the COVID-19 Maternal Attachment, Mood, Ability, and Support study, which was a larger study that collected survey data describing maternal mental health and breastfeeding during the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper presents findings from the two free-text items describing peripartum experiences. Using the constant comparative method, responses were thematically analyzed to identify and collate major and minor themes. Results 371 participants responded to at least one free-text item. Five major themes emerged: (1) Heightened emotional distress; (2) Adverse breastfeeding experiences; (3) Unanticipated hospital policy changes shifted birthing plans; (4) Expectation vs. reality: 'mourning what the experience should have been;' and (5) Surprising benefits of the COVID-19 pandemic to the delivery and postpartum experience. Conclusions for Practice Peripartum women are vulnerable to heightened stress induced by COVID-19 pandemic sequalae. During public health crises, peripartum women may need additional resources and support to improve their mental health, wellbeing, and breastfeeding experiences., Author(s): Clayton J. Shuman [sup.1] , Mikayla E. Morgan [sup.1] , Jolyna Chiangong [sup.1] , Neha Pareddy [sup.1] , Philip Veliz [sup.1] , Alex Friedman Peahl [sup.2] , Vanessa K. [...]

Objective: The purpose of this proof-of-concept pilot study was to test the initial feasibility and limited efficacy of ArtSpective™ for perinatal substance use (PSU), a novel, arts-based intervention designed to decrease stigmatizing attitudes toward PSU. Methods: Using a pre-post mixed methods quasiexperimental design, ArtSpective™for PSU was pilot tested for proof of concept among a convenience sample of 11 undergraduate and graduate students with experience in maternal-infant nursing from a Midwestern U.S. nursing school. As a proof-of-concept pilot study, we evaluated feasibility (acceptability, demand, and implementation) and limited efficacy. Participants completed presurveys and postsurveys that included satisfaction items, demographic items, and an adapted version of the Attitudes About Drug Use in Pregnancy Scale and participated in a focus group. Focus group data were analyzed using constant comparative methods, and survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Results: Participants reported high demand and satisfaction with the intervention and provided recommendations to improve scalability. ArtSpective™demonstrated significant improvement in stigma toward PSU (pre vs. post: p = .003; d = .633). Conclusion: ArtSpective™ for PSU demonstrated initial feasibility and limited efficacy for improving nurse attitudes toward PSU. Efforts are needed to further test this novel intervention, adapt it to augment existing educational interventions, and improve its scalability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]