Search

The Immuno-Oncology Translational Network (IOTN) was established in 2018 as part of the Cancer Moonshot. In 2022, President Joe Biden set new goals to reduce the cancer death rate by half within 25 years and improve the lives of people with cancer and cancer survivors. The IOTN is focused on accelerating translation of cancer immunology research, from bench to bedside, and improving immunotherapy outcomes across a wide array of cancers in the adult population. The unique structure and team science approach of the IOTN is designed to accelerate discovery and evaluation of novel immune-based therapeutic and prevention strategies. In this article, we describe IOTN progress to date, including new initiatives and the development of a robust set of resources to advance cancer immunology research. We summarize new insights by IOTN researchers, some of which are ripe for translation for several types of cancers. Looking to the future, we identify barriers to the translation of immuno-oncology concepts into clinical trials and key areas for action and improvements that are suitable for high-yield investments. Based on these experiences, we recommend novel National Institutes of Health funding mechanisms and development of new resources to address these barriers.

Focal radiation therapy (RT) has attracted considerable attention as a combinatorial partner for immunotherapy (IT), largely reflecting a well-defined, predictable safety profile and at least some potential for immunostimulation. However, only a few RT-IT combinations have been tested successfully in patients with cancer, highlighting the urgent need for an improved understanding of the interaction between RT and IT in both preclinical and clinical scenarios. Every year since 2016, ImmunoRad gathers experts working at the interface between RT and IT to provide a forum for education and discussion, with the ultimate goal of fostering progress in the field at both preclinical and clinical levels. Here, we summarize the key concepts and findings presented at the Sixth Annual ImmunoRad conference.

Recent evidence indicates that ionizing radiation can enhance immune responses to tumors. Advances in radiation delivery techniques allow hypofractionated delivery of conformal radiotherapy. Hypofractionation or other modifications of standard fractionation may improve radiation's ability to promote immune responses to tumors. Other novel delivery options may also affect immune responses, including T-cell activation and tumor-antigen presentation changes. However, there is limited understanding of the immunological impact of hypofractionated and unique multifractionated radiotherapy regimens, as these observations are relatively recent. Hence, these differences in radiotherapy fractionation result in distinct immune-modulatory effects. Radiation oncologists and immunologists convened a virtual consensus discussion to identify current deficiencies, challenges, pitfalls and critical gaps when combining radiotherapy with immunotherapy and making recommendations to the field and advise National Cancer Institute on new directions and initiatives that will help further development of these two fields.This commentary aims to raise the awareness of this complexity so that the need to study radiation dose, fractionation, type and volume is understood and valued by the immuno-oncology research community. Divergence of approaches and findings between preclinical studies and clinical trials highlights the need for evaluating the design of future clinical studies with particular emphasis on radiation dose and fractionation, immune biomarkers and selecting appropriate end points for combination radiation/immune modulator trials, recognizing that direct effect on the tumor and potential abscopal effect may well be different. Similarly, preclinical studies should be designed as much as possible to model the intended clinical setting. This article describes a conceptual framework for testing different radiation therapy regimens as separate models of how radiation itself functions as an immunomodulatory 'drug' to provide alternatives to the widely adopted 'one-size-fits-all' strategy of frequently used 8 Gy×3 regimens immunomodulation.

Despite regulatory approval of several immune-based treatments for cancer in the past decade, a number of barriers remain to be addressed in order to fully harness the therapeutic potential of the immune system and provide benefits for patients with cancer. As part of the Cancer Moonshot initiative, the Immuno-Oncology Translational Network (IOTN) was established to accelerate the translation of basic discoveries to improve immunotherapy outcomes across the spectrum of adult cancers and to develop immune-based approaches that prevent cancers before they occur. The IOTN currently consists of 32 academic institutions in the USA. By leveraging cutting-edge preclinical research in immunotherapy and immunoprevention, open data and resource sharing, and fostering highly collaborative team science across the immuno-oncology ecosystem, the IOTN is designed to accelerate the generation of novel mechanism-driven immune-based cancer prevention and therapies, and the development of safe and effective personalized immuno-oncology approaches.

Background: The majority of experimental approaches for cancer immunotherapy are tested against relatively small tumors in tumor-bearing mice, because in most cases advanced cancers are resistant to the treatments. In this study, we asked if even late-stage mouse tumors can be eradicated by a rationally designed combined radio-immunotherapy (CRI) regimen. Methods: CRI consisted of local radiotherapy, intratumoral IL-12, slow-release systemic IL-2 and anti-CTLA-4 antibody. Therapeutic effects of CRI against several weakly immunogenic and immunogenic mouse tumors including B78 melanoma, MC38 and CT26 colon carcinomas and 9464D neuroblastoma were evaluated. Immune cell depletion and flow cytometric analysis were performed to determine the mechanisms of the antitumor effects. Results: Tumors with volumes of 2,000 mm³ or larger were eradicated by CRI. Flow analyses of the tumors revealed reduction of T regulatory (Treg) cells and increase of CD8/Treg ratios following CRI. Rapid shrinkage of the treated tumors did not require T cells, whereas T cells were involved in the systemic effect against the distant tumors. Cured mice developed immunological memory. Conclusions: These findings underscore that rationally designed combination immunotherapy regimens can be effective even against large, late-stage tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Radiotherapy elicits dose- and lineage-dependent effects on immune cell survival, migration, activation, and proliferation in targeted tumor microenvironments. Radiation also stimulates phenotypic changes that modulate the immune susceptibility of tumor cells. This has raised interest in using radiotherapy to promote greater response to immunotherapies. To clarify the potential of such combinations, it is critical to understand how best to administer radiation therapy to achieve activation of desired immunologic mechanisms. In considering the multifaceted process of priming and propagating anti-tumor immune response, radiation dose heterogeneity emerges as a potential means for simultaneously engaging diverse dose-dependent effects in a single tumor environment. Recent work in spatially fractionated external beam radiation therapy demonstrates the expansive immune responses achievable when a range of high to low dose radiation is delivered in a tumor. Brachytherapy and radiopharmaceutical therapies deliver inherently heterogeneous distributions of radiation that may contribute to immunogenicity. This review evaluates the interplay of radiation dose and anti-tumor immune response and explores emerging methodological approaches for investigating the effects of heterogeneous dose distribution on immune responses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Radiation therapy (RT) is a pillar of cancer therapy used by more than half of all cancer patients. Clinically, RT is mostly delivered as external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). However, the scope of EBRT is limited in the metastatic setting, where all sites of disease need to be irradiated. Such a limitation is attributed to radiation-induced toxicities, for example on bone marrow and hematologic toxicities, resulting from a large EBRT field. Radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) has emerged as an alternative to EBRT for the irradiation of all sites of metastatic disease. While RPT can reduce tumor burden, it can also impact the immune system and anti-tumor immunity. Understanding these effects is crucial for predicting and managing treatment-related hematological toxicities and optimizing their integration with other therapeutic modalities, such as immunotherapies. Here, we review the immunomodulatory effects of α- and β-particle emitter-based RPT on various immune cell lines, such as CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and regulatory T (Treg) cells. We briefly discuss Auger electron-emitter (AEE)-based RPT, and finally, we highlight the combination of RPT with immune checkpoint inhibitors, which may offer potential therapeutic synergies for patients with metastatic cancers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Low-dose radiation delivered by radionuclides stimulates an immune response against cancer. We hypothesize that this type of low-dose radiation can potentiate chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy against solid tumors. Before evaluating the combination of these therapies in vivo, we aim to determine the impacts of this type of low-dose radiation on CAR T cell viability and functions to guide the selection of the type of radionuclide (actinium-225 or lutetium-177), the dose of radiation (1, 2 or 6 Gy) and how to best sequence their administration. It follows that increasing the radiation dose results in lower CAR T cell viability while enhancing their killing potential to the same extent. At a similar dose, radiation delivered by actinium-225 is more toxic to CAR T cells than lutetium-177. This suggests that 1 or 2 Gy delivered by lutetium-177 may be optimal for in vivo combination studies with CAR T cells. Background and purpose. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have been relatively ineffective against solid tumors. Low-dose radiation which can be delivered to multiple sites of metastases by targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) can elicit immunostimulatory effects. However, TRT has never been combined with CAR T cells against solid tumors in a clinical setting. This study investigated the effects of radiation delivered by Lutetium-177 (177Lu) and Actinium-225 (225Ac) on the viability and effector function of CAR T cells in vitro to evaluate the feasibility of such therapeutic combinations. After the irradiation of anti-GD2 CAR T cells with various doses of radiation delivered by 177Lu or 225Ac, their viability and cytotoxic activity against GD2-expressing human CHLA-20 neuroblastoma and melanoma M21 cells were determined by flow cytometry. The expression of the exhaustion marker PD-1, activation marker CD69 and the activating receptor NKG2D was measured on the irradiated anti-GD2 CAR T cells. Both 177Lu and 225Ac displayed a dose-dependent toxicity on anti-GD2 CAR T cells. However, radiation enhanced the cytotoxic activity of these CAR T cells against CHLA-20 and M21 irrespective of the dose tested and the type of radionuclide. No significant changes in the expression of PD-1, CD69 and NKG2D was noted on the CAR T cells following irradiation. Given a lower CAR T cell viability at equal doses and an enhancement of cytotoxic activity irrespective of the radionuclide type, 177Lu-based TRT may be preferred over 225Ac-based TRT when evaluating a potential synergism between these therapies in vivo against solid tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]