Search

To evaluate the knowledge, skills and barriers to evidence-based practice and the impact of evidence-based practice training for physical therapy clinicians. Physical therapists from a health district in Sydney, Australia were invited to participate. The primary outcome was the Assessing Competency in Evidence-based Medicine scale (range 0–15; 15 is high knowledge and skill) to quantify knowledge and skills. The secondary outcomes were the four subscales of the BARRIERS scale (range 1–4; 4 is high barrier) to quantify barriers. Outcomes were collected at baseline and post an evidence-based practice training program (flipped classroom approach that addressed the core competencies for teaching evidence-based practice) of 3 months duration. Registration: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Register (ACTRN12619000038190). 104 participants completed baseline data and 94 completed post-training data. The mean score for the Assessing Competency in Evidence-based Medicine scale for knowledge and skills at baseline was 9.5 (standard deviation 1.6). The mean BARRIERS subscale scores at baseline were: Healthcare Provider 1.9 (0.5); Research 2.2 (0.5); Setting 2.6 (0.5); and Presentation 2.6 (0.5). On average, training increased the Assessing Competency in Evidence-based Medicine scale score by 0.1 points (95% confidence interval −0.2 to 0.5) and reduced barriers by −0.1 (−0.2 to 0.0; Setting subscale) to −0.2 (−0.3 to −0.1; Healthcare Provider subscale). Physical therapists have knowledge and skill in evidence-based practice that is comparable to other allied health professionals, medical students and medical doctors, and encountered barriers to using high-quality clinical research to guide practice. Training did not change knowledge and skills but did reduce barriers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To identify common characteristics of landmark physiotherapy clinical trials. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) top five trials were compared to 91 physiotherapy trials published in top medical journals and 99 trials randomly selected from PEDro on the following characteristics: PEDro score, sample size, number of trial sites, use of prospective registration, positive or negative trial, citations, citations in guidelines, Altmetric score, impact factor, publications and citations of first and last author, and PEDro codes (sub-discipline, topic, problem, therapy, and body part). Trials were published from 2014 to 2019. One-way independent ANOVA and Chi–squared test evaluated between-group differences. Compared to a random sample of physiotherapy trials, the PEDro top five trials and trials in top medical journals have higher PEDro scores, larger sample sizes, more study sites, more citations (including in guidelines), higher Altmetric scores, more likely to be prospectively registered, less likely to be positive trials, and have first and last authors with more citations and publications. The problem was the only PEDro code was distributed differently across the trial groups. The PEDro top five trials and physiotherapy trials published in the top medical journals have characteristics that may inform the design, conduct, and reporting of future physiotherapy trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Able-bodied people from the two extremes of the distribution of passive dorsiflexion exhibit biomechanical differences when descending stairs. Whether physical therapists could judge accurately the amount of ankle flexibility from observation of stair descent was examined with physical therapists 120 neurological 20 cardiothoracic) and 20 students. Subjects were 18 able-bodied men with high or low passive dorsiflexion. Raters viewed videotaped subjects descending stairs at normal playback speed and in slow motion and rated ankle flexibility on a 20-point scale. 'Flexible' or 'inflexible' subjects were classified correctly better than chance, but accuracy of rating flexibility was relatively poor. Both experience and slow motion playback improved accuracy. Physical therapists can detect extremes of normal flexibility in the ankle, based solely on observation of stair descent, and experienced therapists are better at this task than less experienced ones. Using slow motion videotape enhanced observational analysis.