Search

The optimal high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX)-based combination therapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma is unknown. We report our experience with rituximab, HDMTX, procarbazine and lomustine (R-MPL) given as first-line treatment in our center. Fifty-two patients between 2006 and 2019 were included. Eighteen patients proceeded to autologous transplant or two cycles of intermediate-dose cytarabine. The median age was 62 y (range 28-94) and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) was ≥2 in 62% (32/52). The overall/complete response rates were 79% (41/52) and 52% (27/52), respectively. The median progression-free/overall survival was 19 m/84m, respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse events included infections (17%) and kidney injury (13%). Ten patients (19%) discontinued therapy for toxicity. There were no treatment-related deaths. In summary, in a cohort enriched in frail patients, R-MPL achieved good responses and OS and was safe for all ages. The PFS was sub-optimal, possibly explained by a low proportion of consolidation. This regimen should be evaluated prospectively.

Purpose:AL amyloidosis (AL) treatments are generally based on those employed for multiple myeloma. Anti–B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) chimeric antigen receptor T (CART)-cell therapy, already approved for multiple myeloma, might be too toxic for patients with AL.Experimental Design:Here we describe the ex vivo applicability of a novel in-house, academic anti-BCMA CAR construct on AL primary cells, as well as the safety and efficacy in 4 patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) primary AL, treated in a phase I clinical trial (NCT04720313).Results:Three had MAYO stage IIIa cardiac involvement at enrollment. The treatment proved relatively safe, with a short and manageable grade 3 cytokine release syndrome evident in 2 patients and no neurotoxicity in any. Cardiac decompensations, observed in 2 patients, were also short and manageable. The overall hematologic response and complete response rates were observed in all patients with an organ response evident in all four. Within a median follow-up period of 5.2 (2.5–9.5) months, all 4 patients maintained their responses.Conclusions:BCMA-CART cells provide a first proof-of-concept that this therapy is safe enough and highly efficacious for the treatment of patients with advanced, RR AL.

Supplementary Data

Release testing criteria

Supplementary Figures S1-S7

Several components of the Wnt signaling cascade have been shown to function either as tumor suppressor proteins or as oncogenes in multiple human cancers, underscoring the relevance of this pathway in oncogenesis and the need for further investigation of Wnt signaling components as potential targets for cancer therapy. Here, using expression profiling analysis as well as in vitro and in vivo functional studies, we show that the Wnt pathway component BCL9 is a novel oncogene that is aberrantly expressed in human multiple myeloma as well as colon carcinoma. We show that BCL9 enhances β-catenin–mediated transcriptional activity regardless of the mutational status of the Wnt signaling components and increases cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and the metastatic potential of tumor cells by promoting loss of epithelial and gain of mesenchymal-like phenotype. Most importantly, BCL9 knockdown significantly increased the survival of xenograft mouse models of cancer by reducing tumor load, metastasis, and host angiogenesis through down-regulation of c-Myc, cyclin D1, CD44, and vascular endothelial growth factor expression by tumor cells. Together, these findings suggest that deregulation of BCL9 is an important contributing factor to tumor progression. The pleiotropic roles of BCL9 reported in this study underscore its value as a drug target for therapeutic intervention in several malignancies associated with aberrant Wnt signaling. [Cancer Res 2009;69(19):7577–86]

Supplementary Figures 1-8, Methods from BCL9 Promotes Tumor Progression by Conferring Enhanced Proliferative, Metastatic, and Angiogenic Properties to Cancer Cells

Introduction: Mutated RUNX1 is considered a poor prognostic factor and usually is mutually exclusive with NPM1 mutations. Monitoring of molecular markers for minimal residual disease provides a powerful tool to assess remission and guide clinical decisions. Methods: Newly diagnosed RUNX1-mutated AML patients, designated to intensive chemotherapy-based treatment or nonintensive regimens, were monitored for mutated RUNX1 transcript levels by qPCR with patient-specific primers. Samples were obtained along the treatment course and follow-up. Results: A clear correlation was observed between mutated RUNX1 levels and response to treatment as observed by flow cytometry and STR-based assessment. Conclusion: We demonstrate the feasibility of RUNX1-based MRD to correlate with the clinicopathological status of leukemia. We further suggest how RUNX1 qPCR monitoring can influence clinical decision-making and contribute to improved personalized patient care.

Purpose Primary mediastinal B‐cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is a rare subtype of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Despite its aggressive course, PMBCL is considered curable. While in recent years dose‐adjusted (DA) EPOCH‐R (rituximab, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin) has become widely endorsed as first‐line therapy for newly‐diagnosed PMBCL, the optimal treatment for this disease and the role of radiotherapy (RT) remains unclear. DA‐EPOCH‐R provides good clinical outcomes, albeit is associated with short‐ and long‐term toxicity. To address this issue, the current retrospective bi‐icenter analysis compared efficacy and toxicity of DA‐EPOCH‐R and a less toxic R‐CHOP/R‐ICE regimen used for the treatment of newly‐diagnosed PMBCL. Patients and Methods The study included all patients with a histologically confirmed PMBCL diagnosis treated with DA‐EPOCH‐R or R‐CHOP/R‐ICE between 01/2013‐12/2020 at two tertiary medical centers. Patient demographic and clinical data were derived from institutional electronic medical records. The analysis included 56 patients: 31 received DA‐EPOCH‐R and 25 – R‐CHOP/R‐ICE. Results At a median follow‐up of 1.9 years (IQR 3.1 years), similar progression‐free survival (2.1 versus 2.4 years; p = 0.7667), overall survival (2.5 versus 2.7 years; p = 0.8047) and complete response (80%) were observed in both groups. However, DA‐EPOCH‐R was associated with significantly longer hospitalization required for its administration (p, Primary mediastinal B‐cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is a rare subtype of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma that is considered curable despite its aggressive course. DA‐EPOCH‐R, widely employed as a first‐line therapy for newly diagnosed PMBCL, offers good clinical results, but its utility is hampered by high rates of short‐ and long‐term toxicity. Our findings suggest that the use of R‐CHOP/R‐ICE could be consider as an alternative to DA‐EPOCH‐R in PMBCL patients, since the former regimen, while providing similarly encouraging outcomes, is associated with lower toxicity and significantly reduced hospitalization.

Solitary plasmacytoma (SP) is a rare plasma cell dyscrasia. In this retrospective multicenter study, 68 SP patients were included. Compared to solitary extramedullary plasmacytoma (SEP), patients with solitary bone plasmacytoma (SBP) were younger (57.3 vs. 70.9 years

ObjectivesUS FDA and EMA allow facilitated regulatory pathways to expedite access to new treatments. Limited supportive data may result in major postapproval variations. In Israel, partly relying on Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA), clinical data are reviewed independently by the Advisory Committee of Drug Registration (ACDR). In this study, the correlation between the number of discussions at the ACDR and major postapproval variations is examined.DesignThis is an observational retrospective comparative cohort study.SettingApplications with FDA and/or EMA approval at time of assessment in Israel were included. The timeframe was chosen to allow a minimum of 3 years of postmarketing approval experience for potential major label variations. Data regarding the number of discussions at ACDR were extracted from protocols. Data on postapproval major variations were extracted from the FDA and EMA websites.ResultsBetween 2014 and 2016, 226 (176 drugs) applications, met the study criteria. 198 (87.6%) and 28 (12.4%) were approved following single and multiple discussions, respectively. A major postapproval variation was recorded in 129 (65.2%) compared with 23 (82.1%) applications approved following single and multiple discussions, respectively (p=0.002). Increased risk for major variation was found for medicines approved following multiple discussions (HR=1.98, 95% CI: 1.26 to 3.09) with a median time of 1.2 years, applications approved based on phase II trials (HR=2.58, 95% CI: 1.72 to 3.87), surrogate endpoints (HR=1.99, 95% CI: 1.44 to 2.74) and oncologic indications (HR=2.48, 95% CI: 1.78 to 3.45).ConclusionsMultiple ACDR discussions associated with limited supportive data are predictive for major postapproval variations. Moreover, our findings demonstrate that approval by the FDA and/or EMA does not pave the way to automatic approval in Israel. In a substantial per cent of the cases, submission of the same clinical data resulted in different safety and efficacy considerations, requiring additional supporting data in some cases or even rejection of the application in others.

Anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART) therapy shows remarkable efficacy in patients with relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM). HBI0101, a novel second generation optimized anti-BCMA CART cell therapy, was developed in an academic setting. We conducted a phase I dose-escalation study of HBI0101 (cohort 1, 150x10^6 CART cells, N=6; cohort 2; 450x10^6 CART cells, N=7 and cohort 3, 800x10^6 CART cells, N=7) (NCT04720313) in 20 heavily pretreated R/R MM patients. Grade 1-2 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was reported in 18 patients (90%). Neither grade 3-4 CRS, nor neurotoxicity of any grade were observed. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed in any cohort. The overall response rate (ORR), (stringent) complete response (CR/sCR) and very good partial response (VGPR) rates were 75%, 50% and 25%, respectively. Response rates were dose-dependent with 85% ORR, 71% CR and 57% minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity in the high-dose cohort 3. For the entire cohort, the median overall survival (OS) was 308 days (range, 25-466+), with an estimated OS of 55% as of data cutoff June 27th. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 160 days, with 6 subjects remaining progression free at the time of data cutoff. Our findings demonstrate the manageable safety profile and efficacy of HBI0101. These favorable data are encouraging and support decentralization of CART production at an academic setting, ensuring a sufficient CART supply in the light of the increasing local demand.

Remission assessment in acute myeloid leukemia has evolved over the recent years with the advent of molecular and flow-based minimal residual disease determination. Nonetheless, early time point such as day 5 and day 14 (D14), still have prognostic and therapeutic implications. D14 refractory disease is regarded as a poor prognostic factor, however the therapeutic intervention is still under debate, with evidence suggesting a successful re-induction might offer similar long-term outcome as D14 aplasia. Others advocate the use of more intensive salvage protocols as a mean to overcome the negative prognostic effect. In the current study, we compare outcome of D14 refractory AML patients treated with either re-induction or salvage protocol. More importantly, we identify response characteristics that might suggest which patients will benefit from re-induction approach. Accurate identification of chemotherapy refractory patients might allow the early incorporation of non-chemotherapy based protocols in the future.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a neoplastic plasma-cell disorder characterized by clonal proliferation of malignant plasma cells. Despite extensive research, disease heterogeneity within and between treatment-resistant patients is poorly characterized. In the present study, we conduct a prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial (NCT04065789), combined with longitudinal single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) to study the molecular dynamics of MM resistance mechanisms. Newly diagnosed MM patients (41), who either failed to respond or experienced early relapse after a bortezomib-containing induction regimen, were enrolled to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a daratumumab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone combination. The primary clinical endpoint was safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival. Treatment was safe and well tolerated; deep and durable responses were achieved. In prespecified exploratory analyses, comparison of 41 primary refractory and early relapsed patients, with 11 healthy subjects and 15 newly diagnosed MM patients, revealed new MM molecular pathways of resistance, including hypoxia tolerance, protein folding and mitochondria respiration, which generalized to larger clinical cohorts (CoMMpass). We found peptidylprolyl isomerase A (PPIA), a central enzyme in the protein-folding response pathway, as a potential new target for resistant MM. CRISPR–Cas9 deletion of PPIA or inhibition of PPIA with a small molecule inhibitor (ciclosporin) significantly sensitizes MM tumor cells to proteasome inhibitors. Together, our study defines a roadmap for integrating scRNA-seq in clinical trials, identifies a signature of highly resistant MM patients and discovers PPIA as a potent therapeutic target for these tumors. Integration of longitudinal single-cell analysis of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma patients in a prospective clinical trial uncovers new pathways of drug resistance and identifies potential actionable targets.

Therapeutic options in relapsed refractory (R/R) light-chain (AL) amyloidosis patients are limited. Given the encouraging results in t(11;14) multiple myeloma and the high prevalence of t(11;14) in AL amyloidosis, venetoclax is an attractive treatment option in this setting. We report here the results of a multi-center retrospective study on 26 R/R AL amyloidosis patients treated off-label with venetoclax. The median lines of therapy prior to venetoclax was 3.5 (range 1–7), and 88% of our cohort had t (11;14). Twenty-two patients (85%) were previously treated with daratumumab. The overall hematologic response rate was 88%, 35% achieved a CR, and 35% achieved VGPR. The median event-free survival was 25 months (m) (95% CI 9.7 m-not reached), and the median overall survival was 33 m (95% CI 25.9–39.2 m). Most of the patients in this cohort are in ongoing deep responses and continuing venetoclax therapy. The treatment was relatively safe. One patient died due to infection, and there were two grade 3 infections in our cohort. Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) was not seen in any patient. Dose reductions were frequent but did not affect the efficacy. These promising results require confirmation in a randomized controlled trial.

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent, potentially lethal complication in individuals with cancer. Patients with brain tumors are at particularly high risk for VTE. Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare subtype of diffuse large B cell lymphoma, involving the craniospinal axis. The incidence of VTE in patients with PCNSL was reported as very high, occurring mostly in the early period of therapy. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) throughout the treatment of PCNSL. Patients: All patients >18 years of age diagnosed and treated for PCNSL at our institution in 2005–2017 were included. Results: There were 44 patients; mean age at diagnosis was 61.5 years. Three patients (6.8%) had a personal history of thrombosis, 11 (25%) had a history of diabetes or smoking, and 32 (72%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1 at diagnosis. During treatment with LMWH, no VTE events were recorded; 2 (4.5%) patients experienced a minor bleeding event and 1 (2.3%) a major bleeding event. Conclusions: Among our 44 patients with PCNSL treated with prophylactic LMWH, no VTE events were recorded, and only 1 (asymptomatic) intracranial bleed was recorded. Within the limitations of a retrospective nonrandomized study, our findings suggest that VTE prophylaxis may be beneficial for individuals with PCNSL.

Background: Systemic AL amyloidosis is a rare disease characterized by amyloid fibril deposits, most commonly in the heart and kidneys; there are currently no health authority-approved treatments. Therapies for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), including bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (VCd), have been shown to improve outcomes in AL amyloidosis, but more effective therapies are needed to achieve deep and rapid hematologic responses, reverse amyloid-mediated organ dysfunction, and improve overall survival. Daratumumab is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody approved as monotherapy or in combination with other agents for the treatment of MM. ANDROMEDA (NCT03201965) is a randomized, open-label, active-controlled phase 3 trial of VCd ± daratumumab subcutaneous (DARA SC) in patients with newly-diagnosed AL amyloidosis. After a median follow-up of 11.4 months, the complete hematologic response rate was 53% for DARA SC + VCd (DARA-VCd) and 18% for VCd (odds ratio, 5.1; 95% CI, 3.2-8.2; P Methods: Patients with newly-diagnosed AL amyloidosis with measurable hematologic disease, ≥1 involved organ, cardiac stage (Mayo 2004) I-IIIA, eGFR ≥20 mL/min, and absence of symptomatic MM were randomized 1:1 to DARA-VCd or VCd and treated for six 28-day cycles; thereafter, patients in the DARA-VCd group received DARA SC alone every 4 weeks for up to 24 cycles. PROs were assessed on Day 1 of Cycles 1-6 for both treatment groups and every 8 weeks thereafter in the DARA-VCd group. PRO assessments included the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30-item (EORTC QLQ-C30), the EuroQol 5-dimensional descriptive system (EQ-5D-5L), and Short Form-36 (SF-36). Improvements in EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS) and fatigue scale scores and SF-36 mental component summary (MCS) score were secondary endpoints. Assessment of physical functioning, symptom improvement, functional improvement, and health utility as measured by the SF-36, EORTC QLQ-C30 with supplemental symptom items, and the EQ-5D-5L were exploratory outcomes. Patients completed PRO questionnaires prior to study assessments or study drug administration. Analyses of PROs were performed on the intent-to-treat analysis set; patients without a baseline or post-baseline assessment were censored at date of randomization. Compliance with PRO assessments was calculated as the number of assessments received divided by the number of assessments expected at each time point. Descriptive statistics are provided for all PRO endpoints at each time point by treatment group. A distribution-based method was used to define worsening/improvement in scores. Time to worsening/improvement, hazard ratios, and associated 95% confidence intervals were estimated using Kaplan Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression. Change from baseline at each time point up to Cycle 6 (Week 24) was calculated using a mixed effects model with repeated measures with patients as a random effect and baseline value, treatment group, time (weeks), treatment-by-time interaction, and stratification factors as fixed effects. Results: A total of 388 patients were randomized (DARA-VCd, n=195; VCd, n=193). Compliance rates for all PRO questionnaires were >90% at baseline and >83% through Cycle 6. Median time to improvement was shorter and median time to worsening was longer in the DARA-VCd group than in the VCd group for EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS and fatigue scales and EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale (VAS) (Table 1). Least squares mean scores for EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS and fatigue, EQ-5D-5L VAS, and SF-36 MCS remained stable in the DARA-VCd group but worsened compared with baseline in the VCd group; between-group differences are shown in Table 2. The greatest between-group differences in PRO score changes from baseline were observed at Week 16 (Cycle 4). After Cycle 6, patients in the DARA-VCd group reported improvements in mean GHS and fatigue scores that continued while on treatment (Figure). Conclusions: Patients with AL amyloidosis treated with DARA-VCd experienced clinical improvements without any decrement in health-related quality of life over 6 cycles. Following Cycle 6, improvements in GHS and fatigue were reported in patients in the DARA-VCd group. These findings further support the value of DARA-VCd in patients with AL amyloidosis. Disclosures Sanchorawala: UpToDate: Patents & Royalties; Abbvie: Other: advisory board; Proclara: Other: advisory board; Caleum: Other: advisory board; Regeneron: Other: advisory board; Oncopeptide: Research Funding; Caelum: Research Funding; Prothena: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Palladini:Celgene: Other: Travel support; Jannsen Cilag: Honoraria, Other. Minnema:Servier: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Other: travel support, Research Funding. Jaccard:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: A.J. has served in a consulting or advisory role for Janssen and has received honoraria from, received research funding from, and had travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid for or reimbursed by Janssen., Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: A.J. has served in a consulting or advisory role for Janssen and has received honoraria from, received research funding from, and had travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid for or reimbursed by Celgene., Research Funding. Lee:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Regeneron: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding. Gibbs:Janssen, BMS/Celgene, Amgen, Takeda, Pfizer, Caelum, Abbvie and Eidos: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mollee:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Venner:Janssen, BMS/Celgene, Sanofi, Takeda, Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene, Amgen: Research Funding. Schönland:Janssen: Honoraria, Other: travel support to meetings, Research Funding; Prothena: Honoraria, Other: travel support to meetings, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: travel support to meetings, Research Funding. Suzuki:Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene and Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda, Amgen, Janssen and Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda, Celgene, ONO, Amgen, Novartis, Sanofi, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AbbVie and Janssen: Honoraria. Kim:BMS, Takeda, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Cibeira:Janssen, Akcea Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen, Celgene, Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Educational lectures. Beksac:Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Valent:Celgene: Other: Teaching, Speakers Bureau; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Other: Teaching, Speakers Bureau; Amgen Inc.: Other: Teaching, Speakers Bureau. Wong:GSK: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Fortis: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rosenzweig:Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Bumma:Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau. Gries:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Fastenau:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Tran:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Qin:Janssen: Current Employment. Vasey:Janssen Research & Development: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Tromp:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Weiss:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Vermeulen:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Comenzo:Caleum: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Unum: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; Prothena: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kastritis:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genesis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria. Wechalekar:Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory; Caelum: Other: Advisory.

Purpose: AL amyloidosis (AL) treatments are generally based on those employed for multiple myeloma. Anti–B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) chimeric antigen receptor T (CART)-cell therapy, already approved for multiple myeloma, might be too toxic for patients with AL. Experimental Design: Here we describe the ex vivo applicability of a novel in-house, academic anti-BCMA CAR construct on AL primary cells, as well as the safety and efficacy in 4 patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) primary AL, treated in a phase I clinical trial (NCT04720313). Results: Three had MAYO stage IIIa cardiac involvement at enrollment. The treatment proved relatively safe, with a short and manageable grade 3 cytokine release syndrome evident in 2 patients and no neurotoxicity in any. Cardiac decompensations, observed in 2 patients, were also short and manageable. The overall hematologic response and complete response rates were observed in all patients with an organ response evident in all four. Within a median follow-up period of 5.2 (2.5–9.5) months, all 4 patients maintained their responses. Conclusions: BCMA-CART cells provide a first proof-of-concept that this therapy is safe enough and highly efficacious for the treatment of patients with advanced, RR AL.

Multiple myeloma (MM) progression is dependent on its interaction with the bone marrow microenvironment and the immune system and is mediated by key surface antigens. Some antigens promote adhesion to the bone marrow matrix and stromal cells, while others are involved in intercellular interactions that result in differentiation of B-cells to plasma cells (PC). These interactions are also involved in malignant transformation of the normal PC to MM PC as well as disease progression. Here, we review selected surface antigens that are commonly used in the flow cytometry analysis of MM for identification of plasma cells (PC) and the discrimination between normal and malignant PC as well as prognostication. These include the markers: CD38, CD138, CD45, CD19, CD117, CD56, CD81, CD27, and CD28. Furthermore, we will discuss the novel marker CD24 and its involvement in MM. The bioactivity of each antigen is reviewed, as well as its expression on normal vs. malignant PC, prognostic implications, and therapeutic utility. Understanding the role of these specific surface antigens, as well as complex co-expressions of combinations of antigens, may allow for a more personalized prognostic monitoring and treatment of MM patients.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell based immunotherapy has become a promising treatment mainly for hematological malignancies. Following the major success of CD19-targeted CAR, new potential targets for other malignancies are required. As such, B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is an attractive tumor-associated antigen to be targeted in multiple myeloma (MM). Herein, we aimed at assessing the function and optimal configuration of different BCMA-specific CAR, based on the same targeting moiety but with a different hinge and co-stimulatory domain. We compared their function to that of a previously characterized BCMA-CAR used in clinical trials. All constructs were expressed at high levels by primary human T cells and could trigger cytokine production and cytotoxicity upon co-culture with multiple myeloma targets. Nonetheless, critical differences were observed in off-target activation, exhaustion, and activation marker expression and in vivo antitumoral activity mediated by these different constructs. Interestingly, we noted that CD8-based hinge, combined with a 4-1BB intracellular domain, proved superior compared to IgG4-connecting regions, and/or a CD28-signaling moiety respectively. Overall, this study emphasizes the influence of CAR primary structure on its function and led to the identification of a highly efficient BCMA-specific CAR, namely H8BB, which displayed superior anti-tumoral activity both in vitro and long-term in vivo efficacy.

Background: Systemic AL amyloidosis is characterized by the deposition of insoluble amyloid fibrils produced by light chains synthesized by clonal CD38+ plasma cells. Combining daratumumab (DARA) with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (VCd) has demonstrated significantly improved outcomes in patients with AL amyloidosis. The classification of hematologic complete response (CR) in this disease is evolving, and the absolute reduction of the involved free light chain (iFLC) and the difference between iFLC and uninvolved free light chain (dFLC) are being recognized as very meaningful endpoints. Here, we present results from the ANDROMEDA study (NCT03201965) to demonstrate the impact of achieving deep reductions of iFLC and dFLC on major organ deterioration progression-free survival (MOD-PFS), a novel, key secondary endpoint in this study. Methods: Key eligibility criteria included newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis with measurable hematologic disease (serum monoclonal protein ≥0.5 g/dL by protein electrophoresis or serum free light chain ≥5.0 mg/dL with an abnormal kappa:lambda ratio or dFLC ≥50 mg/L), ≥1 involved organ, cardiac stage I-IIIA, eGFR ≥20 mL/min, and absence of symptomatic multiple myeloma. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive DARA-VCd or VCd alone. All patients received bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 subcutaneous [SC] weekly), cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2 oral [PO] or intravenous [IV] weekly), and dexamethasone (20-40 mg PO or IV weekly) for six 28-day cycles. DARA SC (1800 mg, co-formulated with recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 in 15 mL) was administered by injection weekly in Cycles 1-2, every other week in Cycles 3-6, and every 4 weeks thereafter for up to 24 cycles. Disease evaluations occurred every 4 weeks (Cycles 1-6) and every 8 weeks (after Cycle 7) until major organ deterioration, death, end of study, or withdrawal. The primary endpoint was overall (ie, at any time) hematologic CR rate, defined here as normalization of FLC levels and ratio (FLCr) and negative serum and urine immunofixation, confirmed at a subsequent visit; normalization of uninvolved FLC level and FLCr were not required if iFLC Results: A total of 388 patients were randomized to receive DARA-VCd (n=195) or VCd alone (n=193). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between treatment groups. The median age was 64 years and 65% of patients had ≥2 organs involved. The proportions of patients with heart and kidney involvement were 71% and 59%, respectively, and the proportions of patients with cardiac stage I, II, and IIIA were 23%, 40%, and 37%, respectively. The median duration of treatment was 9.6 months for DARA-VCd and 5.3 months for VCd. Median follow-up was 11.4 months (range, 0.03-21.3+). The rates of deep hematological responses by all criteria strongly favored the DARA-VCd treatment arm (Table). MOD-PFS was longer in patients achieving deep hematological responses by all criteria (Figure). In addition, the corresponding MOD-PFS was similar regardless of the hematological response criteria used. Conclusions: Regardless of the criteria used, the addition of DARA to VCd increased the rates of deep hematologic responses in patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis, which, in turn, was associated with prolonged MOD-PFS. These results support the benefit of DARA in this patient population. References 1. Comenzo RL, et al. Leukemia. 2012;26(11):2317-25 2. Sidana S, et al. Leukemia. 2019;34(5):1472-75 3. Muchtar E, et al. Leukemia. 2019;33(3):790-94 4. Manwani R, et al. Blood. 2019;134(25):2271-2280 Disclosures Comenzo: Amgen: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Prothena: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Unum: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Caleum: Consultancy. Kastritis:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genesis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Palladini:Celgene: Other: Travel support; Jannsen Cilag: Honoraria, Other. Minnema:Celgene: Other: travel support, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy. Wechalekar:Caelum: Other: Advisory; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel; Celgene: Honoraria. Jaccard:Celgene: Honoraria, Other: A.J. has served in a consulting or advisory role for Janssen and has received honoraria from, received research funding from, and had travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid for or reimbursed by Celgene., Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: A.J. has served in a consulting or advisory role for Janssen and has received honoraria from, received research funding from, and had travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid for or reimbursed by Janssen., Research Funding. Sanchorawala:Proclara: Other: advisory board; Abbvie: Other: advisory board; UpToDate: Patents & Royalties; Regeneron: Other: advisory board; Caleum: Other: advisory board; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Prothena: Research Funding; Caelum: Research Funding; Oncopeptide: Research Funding. Lee:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Gibbs:Janssen, BMS/Celgene, Amgen, Takeda, Pfizer, Caelum, Abbvie and Eidos: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mollee:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Venner:Celgene, Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen, BMS/Celgene, Sanofi, Takeda, Amgen: Honoraria. Schönland:Janssen, Prothena, Takeda: Honoraria, Other: travel support to meetings, Research Funding. Suzuki:Takeda, Amgen, Janssen and Celgene: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene and Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda, Celgene, ONO, Amgen, Novartis, Sanofi, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AbbVie and Janssen: Honoraria. Kim:Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Sanofi, Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Cibeira:Janssen, Akcea Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen, Celgene, Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Educational lectures. Beksac:Deva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen&janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Valent:Amgen Inc.: Other: Teaching, Speakers Bureau; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Other: Teaching, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Other: Teaching, Speakers Bureau. Wong:Fortis: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rosenzweig:Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Bumma:Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Dimopoulos:BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Tran:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Qin:Janssen: Current Employment. Vasey:Janssen Research & Development: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Tromp:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Weiss:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Vermeulen:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable neoplasm characterized by infiltration of malignant plasma cells (PCs). Recently, the tumor microenvironment has become of great interest in MM as it known to be involved in progression and metastasis of the disease. CD24, is an adhesion molecule expressed during B cell maturation, is down regulated through the cells differentiation into PCs. Though the role of CD24 in solid cancers is well defined, its role in MM remains unknown. We aimed to understand the involvement of CD24 in MM by up-regulating its expression on MM cell lines by co-culturing the cells with bone marrow stromal cell (BMSCs). We then studied the differences between CD24+ and CD24− MM cells and found that CD24+ MM cells presented a less tumorigenic phenotype by impaired capability to migrate and to create colonies as compared with CD24− MM cells. Furthermore, there were significantly more apoptotic cells in the CD24+ fraction. Additionally, the CD24+ cells also upregulated CXCR4 expression. The decrease tumorigenicity correlated with a “more normal” PC immunophenotype in patients with MM and correlated with CD45 expression and a stronger expression of CXCR4. In summary, we found the expression of CD24 on PCs to correlate with attenuated tumorigenicity.

Combination of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP) is regarded as standard care for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and upfront intensification of therapy is still controversial. The current study aimed to dertermine whether the addition of high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) affects long-term outcomes and could also prevent central nervous system (CNS) relapse. Medical records of 480 patients with DLBCL treated between 1994 and 2013 at Rambam and Hadassah medical centers in Israel were reviewed; 130 (27%) had received HDMTX. Patients receiving HDMTX generally had higher International Prognostic Index (IPI) and CNS-IPI scores. HDMTX addition significantly improved progression free and overall survival (

Surface antigens are commonly used in flow cytometry assays for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma (MM). Some of these are directly involved in MM pathogenesis or interactions with the microenvironment, but most are used for either diagnostic or prognostic purposes. In a previous study, we showed that in-vitro, CD24-positive plasma cells exhibit a less tumorigenic phenotype. Here, we assessed the prognostic importance of CD24 expression in patients newly diagnosed with MM as it correlates to their clinical course. Immunophenotyping by flow cytometry of 124 patients uniformly treated by a bortezomib-based protocol was performed. The expression of CD24, CD117, CD19, CD45, and CD56 in bone marrow PCs was tested for correlations to clinical parameters. None of the CD markers correlated with the response rates to first-line therapy. However, patients with elevated CD24+ expression on their PCs at diagnosis had a significantly longer PFS (p = 0.002) and OS (p = 0.044). In contrast, the expression of CD117, CD56, or CD45 was found to have no prognostic value; CD19 expression was inversely correlated with PFS alone (p < 0.001) and not with OS. Thus, elevated CD24 expression on PCs appears to be strongly correlated with survival and can be used as a single-surface antigenic prognostic factor in MM.

Treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) aims at inducing cell apoptosis by surpassing the limited capacity of MM cells to cope with oxidative stress. MM cell survival may further be suppressed by limiting cellular cholesterol. Long-chain fatty acid analogs of the MEDICA series promote mitochondrial stress and inhibit cholesterol biosynthesis, thus prompting us to verify their efficacy and mode-of-action in suppressing MM cell survival, in comparison to bortezomib. MEDICA analog is shown here to effectively suppress survival of MM cells, and to inhibit growth of MM xenograft. Suppression of MM cell survival by MEDICA is accompanied by inhibition of the STAT3, MAPK and the mTORC1 transduction pathways due to mitochondrial oxidative stress. MEDICA-induced oxidative stress is abrogated by added exogenous cholesterol. Suppression of MM cell survival by bortezomib is similarly driven by bortezomib-induced oxidative stress, being abrogated by added cholesterol. In line with that, the time-to-best-response of MM patients to bortezomib-based treatment protocols is shown to be positively correlated with their plasma cholesterol level. MEDICA profile may indicate novel therapeutic potential in the management of MM.

Context Bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy (BIPN) has a profound impact on quality of life, which is an important issue considering the growing number of survivors in multiple myeloma (MM) and light-chain amyloidosis. BIPN is typically symmetric, distal, “stocking and glove” distribution and predominantly consists of sensory rather than motor symptoms. Motor neuropathy induced by bortezomib is uncommon and has been addressed specifically only in case reports and case series. No data has been published on foot drop in the context of bortezomib treatment. Objective Define the characteristics of foot drop associated with bortezomib treatment. Methods We identified the hospital records of 6 patients treated with bortezomib for MM or amyloidosis that developed foot drop, temporally related to bortezomib treatment. Results Six patients, 5 of whom are males, with a median age of 65 years (range 46–74), experienced foot drop. Patients were treated between 2010 and 2020. Three patients had MM, and 3 had AL amyloidosis. In four patients, the involved light chain was lambda, and in two, it was kappa. Two patients received the bortezomib intravenously, and 4 received it subcutaneously. Two patients received bortezomib at a twice-weekly schedule. Two patients did not have “classical” bortezomib peripheral neuropathy prior to the development of the foot drop. Two patients developed the foot drop in the first cycle, and 1 developed it 1 month after treatment discontinuation. One patient developed a foot drop that resolved after bortezomib was discontinued and recured when bortezomib was resumed. One patient had bilateral foot drop. Four patients reported complete resolution 1 year after treatment discontinuation, whereas two patients had gradual improvement but not complete resolution of their foot drop. Conclusions Clinicians need to be aware of the risk for “non-classical” rare neuropathies associated with bortezomib and should monitor for these toxicities and promptly discontinue bortezomib to prevent irreversible nerve damage. Other possible reasons for foot drop, such as compressions due to tumor infiltration or weight loss, should be considered.

Summary Background Selinexor combined with dexamethasone has shown activity in patients with heavily pre-treated multiple myeloma. In a phase 1b/2 study, the combination of oral selinexor with bortezomib (a proteasome inhibitor) and dexamethasone induced high response rates with low rates of peripheral neuropathy, the main dose-limiting toxicity of bortezomib. We aimed to evaluate the clinical benefit of weekly selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus standard bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with previously treated multiple myeloma. Methods This phase 3, randomised, open-label trial was done at 123 sites in 21 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older, who had multiple myeloma, and who had previously been treated with one to three lines of therapy, including proteasome inhibitors, were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive selinexor (100 mg once per week), bortezomib (1·3 mg/m2 once per week), and dexamethasone (20 mg twice per week), or bortezomib (1·3 mg/m2 twice per week for the first 24 weeks and once per week thereafter) and dexamethasone (20 mg four times per week for the first 24 weeks and twice per week thereafter). Randomisation was done using interactive response technology and stratified by previous proteasome inhibitor therapy, lines of treatment, and multiple myeloma stage. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Patients who received at least one dose of study treatment were included in the safety population. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03110562 . The trial is ongoing, with 55 patients remaining on randomised therapy as of Feb 20, 2020. Findings Of 457 patients screened for eligibility, 402 were randomly allocated—195 (49%) to the selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone group and 207 (51%) to the bortezomib and dexamethasone group—and the first dose of study medication was given between June 6, 2017, and Feb 5, 2019. Median follow-up durations were 13·2 months [IQR 6·2–19·8] for the selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone group and 16·5 months [9·4–19·8] for the bortezomib and dexamethasone group. Median progression-free survival was 13·93 months (95% CI 11·73–not evaluable) with selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone and 9·46 months (8·11–10·78) with bortezomib and dexamethasone (hazard ratio 0·70 [95% CI 0·53–0·93], p=0·0075). The most frequent grade 3–4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (77 [39%] of 195 patients in the selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone group vs 35 [17%] of 204 in the bortezomib and dexamethasone group), fatigue (26 [13%] vs two [1%]), anaemia (31 [16%] vs 20 [10%]), and pneumonia (22 [11%] vs 22 [11%]). Peripheral neuropathy of grade 2 or above was less frequent with selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (41 [21%] patients) than with bortezomib and dexamethasone (70 [34%] patients; odds ratio 0·50 [95% CI 0·32–0·79], p=0·0013). 47 (24%) patients in the selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone group and 62 (30%) in the bortezomib and dexamethasone group died. Interpretation A once-per-week regimen of selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone is a novel, effective, and convenient treatment option for patients with multiple myeloma who have received one to three previous lines of therapy. Funding Karyopharm Therapeutics.

Lymphoma of the nervous system is rare and usually involves the brain, spinal cord, or peripheral nerves. Hence, it has varied clinical presentations, and correct diagnosis is often challenging. Incorrect diagnosis delays the appropriate treatment and affects prognosis. We report 5 patients with delayed diagnosis of lymphoma involving the central and/or peripheral nervous system, initially evaluated for other neurological diagnoses. We also discuss the challenge of diagnosis and appropriate testing. Retrospective review of 2011–2019 records of patients with confirmed nervous system lymphoma diagnosed in a tertiary care medical center. We present 5 adult patients initially evaluated for inflammatory myelopathy, inflammatory lumbosacral plexopathy, atypical parkinsonism, and demyelinating disease of the CNS. Final diagnosis of the nervous system lymphoma was delayed by 4 to 18 months and was based on tissue biopsy in 4, and on CSF and bone marrow examination in 1 patient. Lymphoma may imitate various central and peripheral nervous system disorders. We suggest several red flags that indicate the need to consider lymphoma, including subacute but progressive symptomatic evolution, painful neurological deficit, unclear clinical diagnosis, and transient steroid responsiveness. Correct diagnosis often requires a combination of diagnostic tests, while pathology testing is crucial for early diagnosis and is strongly recommended in the appropriate clinical setting.

Background Lenalidomide and ixazomib maintenance improve long-term outcomes in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. However, there is less evidence to support bortezomib (BTZ) maintenance therapy, and real-life data on maintenance are scarce. We investigated the efficacy and safety of BTZ maintenance therapy in NDMM. Patients and Methods A retrospective multisite study was performed in 6 medical centers in Israel. All consecutive patients with NDMM diagnosed between January 1, 2010, and July 3, 2019, who received a BTZ-based induction, with or without an autologous transplantation, followed by BTZ maintenance therapy, were identified. Maintenance therapy was defined as BTZ (1.3 mg/m2) once every 2 weeks, administered subcutaneously alone or with dexamethasone, or weekly BTZ monotherapy. Results A total of 105 patients were identified, 58 of whom had received a transplant (transplant eligible) and 47 who had not (not transplant eligible). During BTZ maintenance therapy, 96% had one or more adverse event, 11.5% had grade 3 or higher adverse events, and 11.5% discontinued treatment due to toxicity. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 45 and 91.5 months, respectively; 4-year survival was 88%. Adverse cytogenetics was associated with worse PFS (24 vs. 46 months, P = .001). In subgroup analysis, adverse cytogenetics were associated with worse PFS (P Conclusion Analysis of multisite real-life data showed that BTZ maintenance therapy is safe, well tolerated, and effective. Median PFS was similar to that reported with alternative maintenance strategies. Our findings further support its use among patients with adverse cytogenetics, it may also be relevant for patients with lenalidomide-intolerant disease.

Perifosine, an investigational, oral, synthetic alkylphospholipid, inhibits signal transduction pathways of relevance in multiple myeloma (MM) including PI3K/Akt. Perifosine demonstrated anti-MM activity in preclinical studies and encouraging early-phase clinical activity in combination with bortezomib. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study was conducted to evaluate addition of perifosine to bortezomib-dexamethasone in MM patients with one to four prior therapies who had relapsed following previous bortezomib-based therapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The study was discontinued at planned interim analysis, with 135 patients enrolled. Median PFS was 22.7 weeks (95% confidence interval 16·0-45·4) in the perifosine arm and 39.0 weeks (18.3-50.1) in the placebo arm (hazard ratio 1.269 [0.817-1.969]

The treatment of relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (RR-ALL) presents a true clinical challenge. In 2012, a protocol combining bortezomib, dexamethasone, asparaginase, doxorubicin, and vincristine administered to children with RR-ALL was published with encouraging results. Over the past 5 years, we have implemented this protocol in the adult RR-ALL population (> 18 years) and addressed its feasibility in terms of remission rate and toxicity. Here, we present the results of our experience in 9 patients, all of whom received multiple previous chemotherapy protocols, two of them relapsing after an allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. All of the five B-ALL patients, and two of the four T-ALL achieved complete remission. Of the seven patients achieving complete remission, two patients were referred for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, two patients were subsequently given blinatumomab, and one patient subsequently received donor lymphocyte infusion followed by blinatumomab. Thus, five out of nine patients treated (55%) were able to proceed to best available therapy in a complete remission. We observed minimal adverse effects, mainly hematological toxicity. We conclude that the bortezomib-based protocol should be evaluated as an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for adult patients either unfit for or failing standard salvage chemotherapy, as a bridge to immunotherapy or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.

Previous studies and meta-analyses addressing COVID-19 in patients with hematological malignancies (HM) have reported dramatically high mortality rates of up to 34% [Vigenthira 2020, Garcia-Suarez 2020, Sharafeldin 2021]. These studies, however, were strongly biased towards hospitalized patients, and poorly represented patients who experienced a milder course of COVID-19, not requiring hospitalization. Jerusalem and its metropolitan area, comprising of over 1.3 million inhabitants, was the epicenter of Israel's COVID-19 crisis, with over 200,000 cases. Hadassah Medical Center, one of only two tertiary centers serving this multi-ethnic population, houses a Hematology Department that includes inpatient services, a hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) center, day care services and in-campus outpatient clinics. From February 20 th, 2020, we tracked patients with confirmed COVID-19 reporting to their treating hematologists while being hospitalized due to COVID-19, at routine visits to the hematology services, or remotely via phone or email communication. This assured the representation of COVID-19 cases of various clinical severities. Data were collected retrospectively and included demographics, comorbidities, hematological diagnoses and treatments, course of COVID-19 and, importantly, source of infection. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess association between prognostic factors and outcomes including hospitalization, severe COVID-19 (per updated WHO criteria) and critical COVID-19, defined as a composite of ICU admission and mortality. Almost all the patients in this series were diagnosed prior to their vaccination. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest single center series of HM patients with COVID-19 reported to date. Our series included 183 patients. Median age was 62.5 years, 57% were men, and 72% had at least one comorbidity. The most frequent hematological diagnoses were indolent lymphoma and CLL (40%), aggressive lymphoma (20%) and multiple myeloma (19%). At the time of COVID-19 diagnosis, 41% of the patients were receiving systemic anti-neoplastic treatment (excluding TKIs for CML and hydroxyurea for MPN), and 16% had undergone a previous allogeneic or autologous HSCT. Overall mortality, severe COVID-19, and hospitalization rates in the entire group were 9.8%, 14.2% and 32%, respectively, remarkably lower than in previous reports. Of the patients not receiving anti-neoplastic treatment, mortality and severe COVID-19 rates were comparable to those of the age-matched general population according to the Israeli Ministry of Health database [Table 1]. Consistent with previous studies, ischemic heart disease (IHD), dyslipidemia, chronic kidney disease, smoking and hypertension, as well as age and active anti-neoplastic treatment, each emerged as a risk factor significantly associated with hospitalization due to COVID-19 [Fig. 1, Table 2]. IHD, smoking, age and active treatment remained significant in multivariate analysis. Age and active treatment as well as ≥4 comorbidities were significantly associated with critical COVID-19. Interestingly, we observed a strong association between the number of prior anti-neoplastic treatment lines and critical COVID-19. Neither history of HSCT nor treatment with monoclonal antibodies were associated with COVID-19 outcomes. Notably, we did not detect any patient that contracted COVID-19 within the Hematology Department services, both inpatient and outpatient. Taken together, we present a different COVID-19 severity landscape in patients with HM as compared to previous observations. While active treatment was significantly associated with COVID-19 hospitalization and mortality, these rates were remarkably lower than previously reported. Despite harboring various degrees of immune suppression, patients with stable or indolent diseases not receiving active treatment appeared to be at a risk comparable to that of the age-matched general population, which depended largely on age and comorbidities. Routine preventive measures including symptom questioning, masks, and social distancing in both our inpatient and outpatient services provided a COVID-19-safe environment, obviating the need for changes in treatment schedules or assignment. These findings may have important consequences for future management of patients with HM in COVID-19 affected regions. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Lavie: AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Fees for lectures; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Other: Fees for lectures; Roche: Other: Fees for lectures; Novartis: Other: Fees for lectures; Takeda: Consultancy. Goldschmidt: AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Gastrointestinal (GI) perforation is remarkably rare in patients with light chain (AL) amyloidosis and has not yet been reported in patients with AL amyloidosis treated with novel agents. Only 24 cases of GI perforation have previously been reported in the setting of AL amyloidosis of which 15 had available information in English. All 15 did not receive novel agent therapy and six died early after experiencing GI perforation. This study reports the characteristics and outcome of AL patients that developed GI perforation in the era of novel agent treatment. Seven patients were reviewed. In two patients, GI perforation was the presenting symptom of AL amyloidosis, whereas five patients developed GI perforations following initiation of an anti-AL therapy (three after bortezomib-based, 1 after lenalidomide-based and 1 after thalidomide-based therapy). All patients underwent surgery and survived the perforation. Treatment was renewed following surgery in six of seven patients, with no further GI complications. In conclusion, GI perforation in AL amyloidosis is rare and mostly reported after treatment initiation. Urgent surgery appears to be lifesaving and renewal of the anti-AL novel therapy appears to be safe, with no significant risk for re-perforation or GI toxicity. Prognosis in these patients is related to severity of the disease and response to therapy rather than the development of GI perforation.

Introduction: Primary central nervous lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma that may involve the brain, spinal cord, leptomeninges and vitreous. The median age at diagnosis is in the fifth decade and most patients (pts) present with significant neurologic deficit and a low performance status. The optimal treatment of PCNSL is controversial. High dose methotrexate (HDMTX) is a standard treatment of PCNSL and is more effective when given in combination with other CNS-penetrating medications, which, however, add to the toxicity of the treatment. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of the combination of rituximab, HDMTX, procarbazine and lomustine (R-MPL) in pts with PCNSL. Patients and methods: We retrospectively reviewed the files of PCNSL pts treated in Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel, between the years 2006-2019. The medical records were reviewed for demographic details and initial disease characteristics (age, sex, performance status, laboratory results, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) content and tumor location), and for therapeutic details including chemotherapy protocol, toxicity, response to treatment and survival. We excluded pts who could not receive HDMTX. The R-MPL is a 42-day cycle protocol, consisting IV Rituximab 375 mg/m2 on days 1, 15 and 28, IV HDMTX 5 g/m2 (3.5 g/m2 for pts > 60 Years (y)) on days 2, 15 and 29, PO procarbazine 100 mg/m2 (60 mg/m2 for pts > 60 y) on days 3-9, PO lomustine 60 mg/m2 (40 mg/m2 for pts > 60 y) on day 2. Six to nine intrathecal (IT) injections of MTX / cytarabine were included for pts with positive CSF cytology, tumor adjacent to ventricles, or per physician's decision. Rituximab was given for no more than 8 doses in total. A total of 3-4 courses of R-MPL were given. Responsive pts could proceed to autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) with TECAM conditioning or 2 cycles of intermediate dose cytarabine (IDAC, 1.5 g/m2), 2 doses in each cycle. Those who achieved less than CR or had significant toxicity to R-MPL received additional ifosfamide/etoposide or high dose cytarabine or temazolamide or topotecan. Radiation was given only for salvage. Results: Fifty-two pts were included in the study. Median age was 62 years (range 28-94). Three (6%) had leptomeningeal involvement, thirteen (25%) had vitreoretinal involvement, 30 (58%) had involvement of the deep brain. Mean ECOG, IELSG and MSKCC scores were 1.98, 2.53 and 1.94 respectively. The median number of HDMTX doses was 8 (range 3-16). Forty-five (87%) pts completed at least one 42-day cycle of R-MPL. Among this group, 29 (64%) pts received at least 3 IT injections, 12 (27%) underwent ASCT, 10 (22%) received IDAC, and 7 (16%) received other chemotherapies. The median follow-up was 27 months (m) (range 0.4-140m). The overall response rate (ORR) was 79% (41/52), and the complete response (CR) rate was 52% (27/52). The median progression free survival (PFS) was 15.5m and the median overall survival (OS) was 27m. Among the 45 pts who received at least one R-MPL cycle, the ORR was 87% (39/45), the CR rate was 60% (27/45), the median PFS was 84m and the median OS was not reached (figure 1). Known prognostic factors correlated with OS: age (p ASCT/IDAC did not improve PFS/OS, however numbers were small. Achieving CR at the end of treatment strongly correlated with PFS/OS, but timing of best response (after one 42-day cycle Vs later) did not. Grade 3-4 adverse events included infections (21%) and kidney injury (13%). Two pts died during therapy, both in the 1st cycle due to disease progression. Ten pts (19%) discontinued therapy due to toxicity. No treatment related mortality (TRM) was documented. Conclusions: The R-MPL protocol achieved a favorable ORR/PFS/OS as described, with reasonable grade 3-4 toxicity and no TRM. The advantage of ASCT/IDAC could not be assessed due to small number of pts. IT injections (at least 3) and achievement of CR at the end of treatment correlated with survival. The R-MPL protocol was reported in previous trials only among the elderly, and should further be evaluated in all age groups. Disclosures Goldschmidt: Abbvie Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding.