Search

Objectives: Lupus imposes a substantial burden on patients; however, little is known about its impact on those caring for patients with the disease. In this study, we examined the impact 'caring for patients with lupus' has on caregivers from their own perspective. Methods: UNVEIL was a one-time online national cross-sectional survey developed in partnership with the Lupus Foundation of America and fielded targeting the US Lupus Foundation of America constituents in 2014. Eligible caregivers were adults who self-identified as unpaid caregivers of patients with lupus. Eligible caregivers had to complete a series of sociodemographic questions as well as a series of well established outcome measures, such as the Short Form 12v2 Health Survey, the Work Productivity and Activity Index, the Caregiver Burden Inventory, and the Perceived Benefits of Caregiving Scale. Results: A total of 253 caregivers completed the survey. The majority of caregivers (90.1%) were aged 60 years or younger, more than half (54.2%) were men, and more than half (59.7%) identified themselves as either a spouse or a partner to the patient with lupus they were caring for. Overall health-related quality of life was close to the norm mean of the general US population. Caregivers who were employed missed an average of 12.8% of paid work time due to caregiving responsibilities and reported a 33.5% reduction in on-the-job effectiveness. Nearly half of the caregivers surveyed (49.4%) indicated that their caregiving responsibilities impacted their ability to socialize with friends, and almost all caregivers (97.6%) reported experiencing increased anxiety and stress in relation to their caregiving role. Conclusions: Caregiving for patients with lupus has a substantial impact on the work productivity and the social and emotional functioning of caregivers. Healthcare professionals and policymakers should continually assess the impact of healthcare decisions on the well-being of those caring for patients with lupus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objective: Methylmalonic acidemia (MMA) and propionic acidemia (PA) are rare inborn errors of metabolism with shared signs and symptoms that are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. No disease-specific clinical outcomes assessment instruments for MMA and/or PA currently exist to capture the patient perspective in clinical trials. Because patients with these conditions are generally young and have cognitive impairments, an observer-reported outcome (ObsRO) instrument is crucial. We report results from qualitative research supporting development of the Methylmalonic Acidemia and Propionic Acidemia Questionnaire (MMAPAQ), a signs and symptoms ObsRO measure for caregivers of patients with MMA and/or PA., Methods: Concept elicitation (CE) interviews were conducted with 35 participants across 2 studies who were aged ≥18 years and caregivers of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of MMA or PA, and an additional 5 patients aged ≥6 years with MMA or PA in Study 1, to identify core signs/symptoms for inclusion in the MMAPAQ. All interviews were conducted in English. Study 2 included cognitive interviews (CI) with caregivers and clinical experts to further assess content validity. CE and a conceptual framework review were also conducted with clinical experts to further support findings., Results: A consistent set of signs/symptoms of MMA and PA were reported by eligible caregivers interviewed in study 1 (n = 21) and study 2 (n = 14), representing 11 patients with MMA and 20 with PA. Based on concepts reported in study 1, a draft instrument was constructed and compared with the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ (PedsQL™) and Family Impact module, demonstrating face validity for measuring key signs/symptoms important to patients and caregivers. The PedsQL™ and Family Impact modules were preferred to assess patient and caregiver impacts. Two waves of CE and CIs were conducted in study 2, with wave 1 resulting in removal of 7 items and other revisions to improve clarity, and wave 2 resulting in modification of examples used for 2 items. The final instrument consisted of the following 7 items assessed over the past 7 days using a Likert-type response scale ranging from "never" to "very often": uncontrollable or involuntary movements, dehydration, rapid breathing at rest, appearing lethargic, appearing disinterested in eating, refusing to eat, and vomiting., Conclusions: This study establishes the content validity of the MMAPAQ as the first ObsRO questionnaire for measuring core signs and symptoms of MMA and PA in clinical trials and community research. Scoring and psychometric measurement properties of the MMAPAQ will be established in future studies. The PedsQL™ was found to have face validity in measuring concepts that affect the MMA and PA patient populations and should also be considered for use in clinical trials in MMA and PA., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Vanja Sikirica and Geetanjoli Banerjee are employees of Moderna, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA. Ethan J. Schwartz, M. Alex Bellenger, Neha Durgam, and Olga Moshkovich are employees of ICON plc, Raleigh, NC, USA. Jerry Vockley has received research funding for clinical trials from Moderna, Inc., and served as a paid consultant for development of this project. Kathy Stagni reports no conflicts of interest or competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Moderna Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to generate evidence supporting the development and content validity of a new PRO instrument, the Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO) Symptom Measure (SSM) daily diary. The SSM assesses symptom severity in SIBO patients, with the ultimate goal of providing a fit for purpose PRO for endpoint measurement., Methods: Qualitative research included 35 SIBO patients in three study stages, using a hybrid concept elicitation (CE)/cognitive interview (CI) method with US patients, ≥ 18 years. Stage 1 included a literature review, clinician interviews, and initial CE interviews with SIBO patients to identify symptoms important to patients for inclusion in the SSM. Stage 2 included hybrid CE/CI to learn more about patients' SIBO experience and test the draft SSM. Finally, stage 3 used CIs to refine the instrument and test its content validity., Results: In stage 1 (n = 8), 15 relevant concepts were identified, with items drafted based on the literature review/clinician interviews and elicitation work. Within stage 2 (n = 15), the SSM was refined to include 11 items; with wording revised for three items. Stage 3 (n = 12) confirmed the comprehensiveness of the SSM, as well as appropriateness of the item wording, recall period, and response scale. The resulting 11-item SSM assesses the severity of bloating, abdominal distention, abdominal discomfort, abdominal pain, flatulence, physical tiredness, nausea, diarrhea, constipation, appetite loss, and belching., Conclusions: This study provides evidence supporting the content validity of the new PRO. Comprehensive patient input ensures that the SSM is a well-defined measure of SIBO, ready for psychometric validation studies., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objective: To understand the long-term experience of patients receiving ide-cel chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cell therapy for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in the pivotal phase 2 KarMMa trial., Methods: This qualitative study analyzed semi-structured patient interviews 6-24 months after ide-cel infusion. Thematic analysis with quantitative and longitudinal analyses explored patient perceptions of ide-cel treatment experience, advantages and disadvantages, and long-term health-related quality of life impact. Patient journeys were developed from narrative analysis of perceived treatment benefits with known remission length., Results: Interviews with 45 patients 6-24 months postinfusion were analyzed; all reported ≥ 1 ide-cel treatment advantage, most often related to efficacy (n = 42/45, 93%), few or no side effects (n = 35/45, 78%), and avoidance of other treatments (n = 34/45, 76%). Patients generally reported 6-month improvements in physical health, functioning, emotional well-being, social life, and outlook on the future; these improvements mostly remained "stable" through 18 and 24 months. The most common patient journeys comprised physical, functioning, or emotional benefit with remission < 2 years., Conclusions: Longitudinal analysis of patient experiences showed sustained benefits and preference for ide-cel up to 24 months after treatment. Trial Registration Number and Date: NCT03361748. December 5, 2017., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest MD has received research funding and honoraria from Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Karyopharm, and Sanofi. PRO has served as a consultant for and received honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Kite Pharma, Oncopeptides, and Sanofi; has served as a consultant for Takeda; and has served on the board of directors or advisory committee and speakers bureau for Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Oncopeptides, Regeneron, and Sanofi. NS has worked in an advisory role for Allogene Therapeutics, Amgen, CareDx, CSL Behring, GlaxoSmithKline, Indapta Therapeutics, Karyopharm, Kite Pharma, Oncopeptides, and Sanofi; has received research funding from bluebird bio, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Janssen, Nektar, Poseida, Precision Biosciences, Sutro Biopharma, and Teneobio; and is an employee and stockholder of AstraZeneca. OM, SL, MM, and HG are employees of ICON plc. JD is an employee and stockholder of ICON plc. JB, DSD, and TBC are employees and stockholders of Bristol Myers Squibb. NCM has served as a consultant for AbbVie, Adaptive, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Legend, Novartis, Pfizer, and Takeda; has served as a consultant for, holds stock, patents and royalties in, and is a member on a board of directors or advisory committee for Oncopeptides; and is an employee of Dana Farber Cancer Institute., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Voxelotor is a first-in-class sickle hemoglobin-polymerization inhibitor that was approved in 2019 by the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) aged ≥12 years; in 2021, the approval was extended to children with SCD aged 4 to 11 years. Additionally, both the Ministry of Health and Prevention for the United Arab Emirates and the European Commission granted marketing authorization for voxelotor in September 2021 and February 2022, respectively, for treatment of SCD in adults and pediatric patients aged ≥12 years. Thus, additional information on the patient experience with voxelotor would be useful for patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals alike. The purpose of this study was to conduct semistructured interviews in an effort to understand the experiences and perspectives of voxelotor-treated patients with SCD., Methods: One-time semistructured interviews with adults, adolescents, and children with SCD and their primary caregivers were conducted in the United States. Twenty-three adults and adolescents were recruited across 4 clinical sites, and 10 children-caregiver dyads were recruited from a single site. The interview was designed to elicit patient perspectives on symptomatic changes with voxelotor and the impact of treatment on patients' perceived health-related quality of life. Individual interview transcripts were analyzed using a thematic analytic approach, and concept saturation was assessed in both cohorts., Results: Most patients reported improvements in their SCD symptoms with voxelotor treatment, specifically regarding pain crises, jaundice, and fatigue. Almost all patients experienced improvements in self-reported health-related quality of life with voxelotor treatment., Conclusions: This study provides patient and caregiver perspectives on the symptomatic benefits of voxelotor treatment. These findings not only highlight the benefits of voxelotor treatment in improving symptoms and increasing health-related quality of life across the entire SCD population but also can inform further research on SCD-specific patient-reported outcomes., Competing Interests: Clark Brown is an employee at Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc.; a consultant at Imara and Novo Nordisk; and a recipient of the research funding from Forma Therapeutics, Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc., Imara, and Novartis. Modupe Idowu is on the advisory board at Novartis; on the advisory board and a speaker at Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc.; and a recipient of the research funding from Pfizer Inc., Novartis, Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc., and Forma Therapeutics. Richard Drachtman is a consultant and speaker at Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc. and Agios; a speaker at Jazz Pharmaceuticals; and a consultant at Bluebird Bio. Anne Beaubrun is an employee at Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc. Irene Agodoa and Andy Nguyen are former employees at Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc. Kelly Lipman, Olga Moshkovich, Ryan Murphy, and M. Alex Bellenger are employees at ICON plc. Wally Smith is a consultant at Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc., Novartis, Pfizer Inc., GlycoMimetics, Ironwood, Novo Nordisk, Emmaus Pharmaceuticals, Fera Pharmaceuticals, and Agios Pharmaceuticals and a recipient of the research funding from Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc., NHLBI, PCORI, HRSA, Novartis, Forma Therapeutics, Imara, and Shire., (Copyright © 2023 Clark Brown et al.)

Objective: To understand the experience of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) receiving idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel), a B-cell maturation antigen-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy, in the pivotal, phase 2 KarMMa trial., Methods: Optional semi-structured interviews before leukapheresis (pre-treatment) captured expectations and after ide-cel infusion (1, 2, and 3 months post-treatment), assessed treatment experience, ide-cel advantages/disadvantages, and health and well-being. In a mixed-method analysis, treatment experiences were categorized by clinical response status, health and well-being, and self-reported recovery after infusion., Results: Pre-treatment interviews indicated unmet treatment needs. In post-treatment interviews, most patients reported the positives of ide-cel outweighed negatives (69%, n = 27/39). Most common advantages of ide-cel were efficacy (18-64%), favorable side-effect profile (46-68%), and recovery time (13-18%); most common disadvantages were related to side effects (13-20%). When analyzed by clinical response, patients most often had stringent complete or very good partial response and improved health and well-being with mild or severe recovery from the infusion (27/58, 47%). Most patients with minimal clinical response reported mild infusion recovery (5/6, 83%)., Conclusions: Patient interviews before ide-cel treatment showed unmet needs in triple-class exposed RRMM. Post-treatment experiences generally favored ide-cel versus previously received treatments., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Achondroplasia, caused by a pathogenic variant in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 gene (FGFR3), leads to significant multisystem complications across the lifespan that may affect the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of individuals and families living with the condition., Methods: The objective of this qualitative study was to describe the HRQoL of children and adolescents with achondroplasia and their caregivers. Thirty-four caregivers and 12 adolescents from the United States and Spain participated in one of eight focus groups or completed an individual interview, which was audio-recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis of qualitative data was performed to identify commonly occurring themes pertaining to HRQoL., Results: Caregivers and adolescents described challenges with physical functioning and medical complications due to achondroplasia. Key challenges included difficulties performing activities of daily living, issues of accessibility, bullying, or unwanted attention in public, and negative effects on self-esteem. Caregivers were concerned about accessing appropriate medical care for their child, and also reported experiencing financial, relational, and emotional challenges in their families. Achondroplasia also affected individuals and their families in positive ways, including increasing empathy, receiving positive attention, and feeling supported by the achondroplasia community., Conclusions: These findings underscore the importance of regular assessments of HRQoL and the provision of psychosocial support to affected children and families., (© 2022 BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Purpose: Heart failure (HF) is a common condition that places considerable burden on patients. We aimed to develop a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure to assess the symptoms and impacts of HF., Methods: Phase 1: a targeted literature review, expert interviews, and concept elicitation (CE) interviews with patients with HF (n = 26) were used to develop a conceptual model of the core symptoms and impacts of HF. To capture these concepts, three new fit-for-purpose PRO questionnaires were constructed in accordance with US Food and Drug Administration PRO guidance. Phase 2: three 'waves' of cognitive interviews were conducted with patients with HF (n = 28) to validate and refine the questionnaires., Results: Three key symptoms-shortness of breath, oedema, and fatigue-were identified across the literature review, expert interviews and CE interviews. Several additional symptoms, cognitive changes and impacts of HF were reported in the CE interviews and included in the conceptual model. A 10-item symptom questionnaire (Heart Failure-Daily Symptom Diary) was constructed; cognitive testing showed that the final PRO measure was easy to understand/complete and relevant to patients with HF, confirming content validity. Two HF impact questionnaires were developed (Assessing Dyspnoea's Impact on Mobility and Sleep and Heart Failure-Functional Status Assessment), but required refinement to ensure patient understanding., Conclusions: Patient input contributed to the development of a PRO instrument for assessing physical and cognitive symptoms important to patients with HF using novel measurement strategies. Inclusion of daily metrics offers differentiation from other qualified instruments and may provide clinical insight for improving lifestyles. Additionally, two draft PRO measures may, after further validation, be useful to assess the impacts of HF.

Background: The Colorado Adult Joint Assessment Scale (CAJAS) is designed to assess joint health in adults with hemophilia. The CAJAS comprises nine items (swelling, muscle atrophy, axial deformity, crepitus, range of motion, contracture, instability, strength, gait) and assesses six joints., Objective: To assess CAJAS content validity and psychometric properties., Patients/methods: Data were obtained from the Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Secondary Prophylaxis With rFVIII Therapy in Severe Hemophilia A Adult and/or Adolescent Subjects Compared to That of Episodic Treatment (SPINART) study and a separate CAJAS validation study. CAJAS assessments in SPINART were performed by physical therapists (PTs) from the United States, Romania, Bulgaria, and Argentina. In the validation study, content validity was assessed from interviews with six PTs at three US hemophilia centers; cultural equivalence was assessed with seven non-US PTs from SPINART. Reliability data were collected from 30 subjects at four US centers. Test-retest reliability was evaluated by having the same PT perform CAJAS examinations at two visits, 7-10 days apart. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by comparing CAJAS scores of two different PTs performing separate examinations of the same patient several hours apart at the same visit. Psychometric properties were assessed using SPINART and validation study data., Results: The CAJAS demonstrated good content validity. Test-retest reliability was high (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.98), as was inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.88). Internal consistency reliability was strong (α = .90). The CAJAS demonstrated good convergent/divergent validity, known-groups validity, and ability to detect change., Conclusions: The CAJAS is a valid and reliable measure of joint health in adults with moderate-severe hemophilia and is appropriate for use in clinical practice., (© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

Over the last 50 years, the incidence of cervical cancer has dramatically decreased. However, health disparities in cervical cancer screening (CCS) persist for women from racial and ethnic minorities and those residing in rural and poor communities. For more than 45 years, federally funded health centers (HCs) have been providing comprehensive, culturally competent, and quality primary health care services to medically underserved communities and vulnerable populations. To enhance the quality of care and to ensure more women served at HCs are screened for cervical cancer, over eight HCs received funding to support patient-centered medical home (PCMH) transformation with goals to increase CCS rates. The study conducted a qualitative analysis using Atlas.ti software to describe the barriers and challenges to CCS and PCMH transformation, to identify potential solutions and opportunities, and to examine patterns in barriers and solutions proposed by HCs. Interrater reliability was assessed using Cohen's Kappa. The findings indicated that HCs more frequently described patient-level barriers to CCS, including demographic, cultural, and health belief/behavior factors. System-level barriers were the next commonly cited, particularly failure to use the full capability of electronic medical records (EMRs) and problems coordinating with external labs or providers. Provider-level barriers were least frequently cited.

Background: Many underage drinkers obtain alcohol from legal-age family, friends, and acquaintances. This study aimed to understand the attitudes and behaviors of young adults related to providing alcohol to underage drinkers., Methods: Participants were 755 current or recent college students of legal drinking age (ages 22 to 26) who were approached by a minor to provide alcohol at least once since turning 21. Interviewers assessed frequency of providing alcohol, relationship to the recipients, and general attitudes about providing alcohol to minors. Separate questions asked about younger (under 18) and older (18 to 20) minors. Correlates and predictors of provision and frequency of provision were examined via logistic regression and Poisson regression, focusing on demographics, sensation-seeking, behavioral dysregulation, age at first drink, parental history of alcohol problems, fraternity/sorority involvement, attitudes about provision, violations, peer drinking norms, and alcohol use disorder (AUD) risk during and post-college., Results: Most participants (84.6%) provided alcohol to minors at least once. Provision to older minors was more prevalent (82.8%) than to younger minors (20.7%); it was also more frequent. Few (2.4%) were ever caught providing alcohol. Recipients were more commonly friends or family members rather than acquaintances or strangers. Legal concerns about providing alcohol (82.5 and 53.7% for younger and older minors, respectively) were more prevalent than health concerns (55.7 and 9.5%). Legal concerns consistently predicted lower likelihood of provision, independent of demographics. Health concerns and lower post-college AUD risk scores also independently predicted lower likelihood of provision, but only to older minors. Fraternity/sorority involvement and higher peer drinking norms were associated with higher provision frequency, whereas legal concerns and college violations were associated with lower provision frequency., Conclusions: Young adults who have recently turned 21 could represent an important target for prevention strategies to reduce underage drinking on college campuses. More research is needed to understand the motivations of young adults who provide alcohol to underage drinkers., (Copyright © 2014 by the Research Society on Alcoholism.)