Search

Some studies have shown disproportionate cancer incidence burden in rural areas which may be attributable partly due to the use of 'rural' as a generic term implying homogeneity of risk/protective factors across wide geographic spans. Counties in SEER 18 registries (years 2001-2011) were classified by their Rural-Urban Continuum Code (RUCC) and aggregated into urban, adjacent rural, and non-adjacent rural and were also aggregated into 3 regions: North, South, and West. Two-way ANCOVA was performed with region and RUCC as factors with adjustment for rates of common risk factors obtained from the County Health Rankings (2013). RUCC has a significant effect on incidence rate in urban areas on breast (P =0.001) and prostate (P =0.009). Colorectal significantly varies by region (P<0.0001), and the effect of rurality significantly varies across regions with North highest (P=0.0005). Lung rates significantly vary across both region and RUCC (P<0.0001 and P=0.0001, respectively). The analysis shows that risk-adjusted cancer incidence varies significantly across regions. However, we also found that rural cancer incidence significantly varied across otherwise-similar rural areas implying that 'rural' is not a homogeneous classification.