1. Comparative safety and effectiveness of cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Author
-
Muhammad Furqan, Ifrah Inbisat Raza, Shaheera Younus, Hareer Fatima, Hiba Azhar, Sania Kaneez Fatima, Laiba Ali, Sara Khan, and Aayat Ellahi
- Subjects
Atrial fibrillation ,Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ,Pulmonary vein isolation ,Cryoballoon ,Radiofrequency ablation ,Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,RC666-701 - Abstract
Abstract Background Over the past fifty years, the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) has tripled. Traditionally, the main treatment for this condition has been pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) performed using radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). However, another technique known as cryoballoon ablation (CBA) has been developed as another option for managing this heart rhythm disorder. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of CBA and RFCA for the treatment of AF. Methods This study compared the safety and effectiveness of CBA and RFCA for the treatment of AF using a thorough review of randomized controlled trials up until June 1, 2023. Results The results revealed that CBA and RFCA had similar effectiveness and safety profiles in achieving freedom from AF (RR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.93 to 1.07, p = 0.99) and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) (RR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.10, p = 0.79). CBA was faster (MD = − 23.99; 95% CI: − 32.98 to − 15.00; p
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF