Search

The dynamic and uncontrolled nature of paramedic work frequently exposes these workers to physical and psychological injury. Often paramedic injury rates are estimated based on national injury surveillance data or compensation databases. These data sources tend to only capture cases of a more serious nature and overlook the broader factors that contribute to injury. This limits our understanding of the true burden of paramedic injury and the characteristics associated with increased injury severity. To describe the incidence and proportions of paramedic occupational injury in Victoria, Australia, and to determine the injury-related characteristics associated with lost time from work. A retrospective analysis of paramedic injury report data from the single state-wide ambulance service in Victoria, Australia – Ambulance Victoria. Injuries reported between 1 January 2015 and 30 June 2020 were included. Chi-square tests of independence were used to explore shift and injury characteristic variables that may be associated with time lost from work. Over the study period, 7,591 paramedic injuries were reported that met the inclusion criteria, of which 2,124 (28%) resulted in lost time from work. The cumulative incidence of paramedic injury was 333.8 injuries per 1,000 FTE workers per year, and the rate of lost time injury was 93.0 per 1,000 FTE workers per year. Musculoskeletal injuries were the most frequently reported injury type irrespective of lost time status. Manual handling followed by psychological stressors were the two leading mechanisms of injury based on incidence. Psychological injury was associated with lost time from work (X2= 384.2, p < 0.001). Conversely, injury to the head and neck (X2= 7.5, p = 0.006), and upper limb injuries (X2= 104.5, p < 0.001), were more strongly associated with no lost time from work. Paramedics working in Victoria have a higher rate of work-related injury than other Australian workers. Injury-related factors that are often overlooked, such as time, shift type, location, and injury characteristics, all contribute to an increased risk of lost time injury. An understanding of the factors that contribute to an increase in injury severity may facilitate the development and targeting of appropriate interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Paramedics are frequently exposed to acute and/or chronic environmental, operational and patient-related factors that increase their risk of physical and psychological injury. However, there has been wide variation in reported paramedic injury rates. This systematic review aims to synthesise the evidence to examine the incidence and nature of occupational injury among paramedics., Methods: This systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PROSPERO 2020: CRD42020164556). A systematic search of four electronic databases was conducted for the years 2004-2019. Peer-reviewed studies examining the incidence and proportions of paramedic occupational injury within civilian emergency medical services (EMS) were included. Injury types, mechanisms, contributing factors and incidence of injury were synthesised narratively., Results: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. The incidence of injury ranged from 29.7 to 345.6 injuries per 1000 workers per year. Sprains and strains were the most reported injury types, and the trunk and upper limbs were the main sites. Body motion was the most frequently reported mechanism of injury, accounting for 35%-55% of all injuries. Female paramedics had a proportionally higher rate of injury compared with male paramedics. Paramedics aged 25-34 years accounted for the majority of fatal (mean 34.0%) and non-fatal (mean 51.7%) injuries., Conclusion: This review highlights the increased risk of occupational injury among paramedics and provides further insight into their overall injury profile., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

This paper reports the findings of a study of younger and older driver behaviour to hazardous traffic manoeuvres in a driving simulator. Hazardous situations on a highway and residential drive were studied and drivers' vision and vehicle performance responses were collected. While all drivers were able to avoid crashes, the finding that older drivers were consistently slower to fixate hazardous stimuli in the driving environment and were slower to respond presents a potentially serious road safety concern. Further research is warranted, especially under conditions of increasing traffic complexity.