Search

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are relatively rare neoplasms with 6.4-times increasing age-adjusted annual incidence during the last four decades. NENs arise from neuroendocrine cells, which release hormones in response to neuronal stimuli and they are distributed into organs and tissues. The presentation and biological behaviour of the NENs are highly heterogeneous, depending on the organ. The increased incidence is mainly due to increased awareness and improved detection methods both in the majority of sporadic NENs (non-inherited), but also the inherited groups of neoplasms appearing in at least ten genetic syndromes. The most important one is multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1), caused by mutations in the tumour suppressor gene MEN1. MEN-1 has been associated with different tumour manifestations of NENs e.g. pancreas, gastrointestinal tract, lungs, thymus and pituitary. Pancreatic NENs tend to be less aggressive when arising in the setting of MEN-1 compared to sporadic pancreatic NENs. There have been very important improvements over the past years in both genotyping, genetic counselling and family screening, introduction and validation of various relevant biomarkers, as well as newer imaging modalities. Alongside this development, both medical, surgical and radionuclide treatments have also advanced and improved morbidity, quality of life and mortality in many of these patients. Despite this progress, there is still space for improving insight into the genetic and epigenetic factors in relation to the biological mechanisms determining NENs as part of MEN-1. This review gives a comprehensive update of current evidence for co-occurrence, diagnosis and treatment of MEN-1 and neuroendocrine neoplasms and highlight the important progress now finding its way to international guidelines in order to improve the global management of these patients.

Context Information regarding the impact of parental multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1) on neonatal outcomes is limited to case reports. Objective To determine the impact of parental MEN 1 on neonatal outcomes. Methods Retrospective cohort analysis of the Tasman 1 MEN 1 kindred stratified by whether birth occurred before (“historical cohort”) or after (“contemporary cohort”) prospective screening commenced. The historical cohort included kindred members born between 1825 and 1984 (n = 341 children with a MEN 1 positive (MEN 1+) parent and n = 314 children with MEN 1 negative (MEN 1–) parents). The contemporary cohort included neonates (n = 52) of MEN 1+ women (n = 21) managed at a tertiary referral hospital between 1985 and 2018. Results Historical cohort: compared with MEN 1– parents, children of MEN 1+ parents were more likely to die postpartum (HR 4.6, P = .046 at 6 months of age). Excess mortality at 15 years of age was observed for children of MEN 1+ mothers (HR 8.50, P = .002) and fathers (HR 3.82, P = .03). Contemporary cohort: neonates of MEN 1+ mothers were more likely to have low birth weight (28.9% vs 6.7%, P = .01), be admitted to a higher care nursery (40.4% vs 17%, P = .02), and require a longer median postnatal stay (5 vs 4 days, P = .009) than the Australian average. Isolated antenatal hypercalcemia did not significantly alter neonatal outcomes. Conclusion Children with a MEN 1+ parent are disproportionately vulnerable postpartum. Neonates of MEN 1+ mothers remain vulnerable despite contemporary care. The excess risk was not fully explained by maternal MEN 1 or antenatal hypercalcemia.

Background MEN1 is a complex, rare, syndrome inherited in an autosomal dominant tract and characterized by the development of multiple neuroendocrine tumors, requiring lifelong surveillance and multiple medical and surgical therapies throughout the patient’s life. For all these reasons, a diagnosis of MEN1 can be a psychological shock for the patient, as well as his/her relatives, more so than the diagnosis of a single tumor. In the last two decades, clinicians have started to consider the emotional, psychological, relational, and social aspects of their patients’ lives. The data collected in the present analyses highlight the unique features of MEN1 syndrome, and aim to evaluate the Quality of Life in the patients and their relatives. In this study, a comprehensive survey of various aspects of Health-Related Quality of Life was performed in a large series of Italian MEN1 patients, by administering five of the most common targeted questionnaires. Results The results of the study showed that our patients, despite having a complex multi-tumor syndrome, were moderately optimistic (50%), and this corresponds with a normal Quality of Life. This positive response is strictly correlated with the fact that the patients are cared for at a dedicated Referral Center, receiving personalized care and constant follow-up, which gives them reassurance regarding the high quality of management of the disorder. Conclusions The possibility of having access to a clinical Referral Center for their complex rare disease, together with the support of a dedicated patient association, has been demonstrated to be the ideal model for the management of post-diagnosis shock, and contributes to the preservation of a good Health-Related Quality of Life for MEN1 patients.

Context Clinical multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) is diagnosed by the presence of at least 2 MEN-1–associated tumors. Many patients with acromegaly and clinical MEN-1 yield negative testing for MEN1 mutations. While cases of acromegaly and primary hyperparathyroidism (PHP) with negative genetic testing have been reported, its prevalence among patients with acromegaly is undetermined, and the clinical presentation has not been well characterized. Objectives The main goals of this study are: (1) To determine the prevalence of clinical MEN-1 with PHP in patients with acromegaly and characterize their clinical features; and (2) to evaluate the genetic basis for the coexistence of acromegaly and PHP. Design Retrospective record review and genetic analysis. Setting Clinical Research Centers. Participants 414 patients with acromegaly. Interventions Clinical evaluation and DNA sequencing for MEN1, CDKN1A, CDKN1B, CDKN2B, CDKN2C, and AIP genes. Main outcome measurements Clinical and genetic analysis. Results Among patients with acromegaly, clinical MEN-1, as defined by the presence of at least one other MEN-1-associated tumor, was present in 6.6%. PHP occurred in 6.1%; more than half had parathyroid hyperplasia. DNA sequencing was unrevealing for genetic mutations, except for 1 case of a CDC73 mutation. Acromegaly was diagnosed at an older age with a higher prevalence of malignancies (specifically breast and thyroid) in patients with coexisting PHP than those with isolated acromegaly. Conclusions A distinct phenotype is described in patients with clinical MEN-1 and negative genetic testing for mutations previously associated with this syndrome. Further studies are needed to identify other genes that may explain the association between PHP and acromegaly.

Context: Bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumours (bpNETs) and thymic carci‐noid (ThC) are features of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1), and surveil‐lance guidelines recommend periodic thoracic imaging. The optimal thoracic imagingmodality and screening frequency remain uncertain as does the prognosis of smalllung nodules when identified. Objectives: To evaluate fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( 18 F-FDG PET/CT) for identification and prognosticassessment of thoracic lesions in MEN 1. Design: Retrospective observational study. Setting and participants: Fifty consecutive MEN 1 patients undergoing screening with 18 F-FDG PET/CT at a tertiary referral hospital between July 2011 and December 2016. Interventions: 18 F-FDG PET/CT. Outcome measures: Pulmonary and thymic lesion prevalence, size, functional characteristics and behaviour. Results: Thirteen patients (26.0%) exhibited pulmonary nodules with multiple nod‐ules identified in nine (18.0%). An asymptomatic 31 mm FDG-avid ThC was identifiedin one patient (2%). Of the 13 patients with pulmonary nodules, four (8.0%) exhibited13 FDG-avid nodules (mean size 10.1 ± 9.1 mm), and nine (18.0%) demonstrated 26FDG nonavid nodules (mean size 6.9 ± 5.8 mm). All FDG-avid lesions increased in size vs 11 (42.3%) FDG nonavid lesions ( P = .0004). For FDG-avid and nonavid nodules,the median doubling time was 24.2 months (IQR 11.4-40.7) and 48.6 months (IQR37.0-72.2), respectively. Nodule resection was undertaken in two patients, typicalbronchial carcinoid diagnosed in one (FDG nonavid) and metastatic renal cell carci‐noma in the second (FDG avid). Conclusion: Thoracic imaging with 18 F-FDG PET/CT effectively identifies pulmonary nodules and ThC. FDG-avid pulmonary lesions are significantly more likely to progress than nonavid lesions.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) throughout the body are the focus of much current interest. Most occur in the gastrointestinal tract and have shown a major increase in incidence over the past 30 years, roughly paralleling the world-wide increase in the use of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) drugs. The greatest rise has occurred in gastric carcinoids (g-NETs) arising from enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cells. These tumors are long known to occur in auto-immune chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES), with or without multiple endocrine neoplasia type-1 (MEN-1), but the incidences of these conditions do not appear to have increased over the same time period. Common to these disease states is persistent hypergastrinemia, generally accepted as causing g-NETs in CAG and ZES, and postulated as having similar tumorigenic effects in PPI users. In efforts to study the increase in their occurrence, g-NETs have been classified in a number of discussed ways into different grades that differ in their incidence and apparent pathogenesis. Based on a large amount of experimental data, tumorigenesis is mediated by gastrin’s effects on the CCK2R-receptor on ECL-cells that in turn leads to hyperplasia, dysplasia, and finally neoplasia. However, in all three conditions, the extent of response of ECL-cells to gastrin is modified by a number of genetic influences and other underlying risk factors, and by the duration of exposure to the hormonal influence. Data relating to trophic effects of hypergastrinemia due to PPI use in humans are reviewed and, in an attached Appendix A, all 11 reports of g-NETs that occurred in long-term PPI users in the absence of CAG or ZES are summarized. Mention of additional suspected cases reported elsewhere are also listed. Furthermore, the risk in humans may be affected by the presence of underlying conditions or genetic factors, including their PPI-metabolizer phenotype, with slow metabolizers likely at increased risk. Other problems in estimating the true incidence of g-NETs are discussed, relating to non-reporting of small tumors and failure of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) and other databases, to capture small tumors or those not accorded a T1 rating. Overall, it appears likely that the true incidence of g-NETs may be seriously underestimated: the possibility that hypergastrinemia also affects tumorigenesis in additional gastrointestinal sites or in tumors in other organ systems is briefly examined. Overall, the risk of developing a g-NET appears greatest in patients who are more than 10 years on drug and on higher doses: those affected by chronic H. pylori gastritis and/or consequent gastric atrophy may also be at increased risk. While the overall risk of g-NETs induced by PPI therapy is undoubtedly low, it is real: this necessitates caution in using PPI therapy for long periods of time, particularly when initiated in young subjects.

Background: The surgical treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism (HPT) in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) has evolved due the concern of permanent hypoparathyroidism. As the diagnosis has increased, the extent of operation has decreased. Most MEN1 patients requiring parathyroidectomy are younger than 50 years and they pose a difficult balance to achieve between persistent HPT and life-long hypoparathyroidism. The aim of the present study is to review our experience with a large series of patients with MEN1-related HPT (HPT/MEN1) treated at a single institution in order to find clues to a better treatment decision in these younger cases.Method: Retrospective analysis of consecutive HPT/MEN1 cases treated at a single institution with different operations: total parathyroidectomy and immediate forearm autograft (TPTX-AG), subtotal (STPTX), unintentional less than subtotal (U-LSTPTX) and intentional less than subtotal parathyroidectomy (I-LSTPTX).Results: Considering 84 initial cases operated on since 2011 (TPTX-AG, 39; STPTX, 22, U-LSTPTX, 13, and I-LSTPTX, 10), the rates of hypoparathyroidism were 30.8% (U-LSTPTX), 28.2% (TPTX-AG), 13.6% (STPTX), and 0% (I-LSTPTX). Two-thirds of them (68%; 57/84) were young (

The widespread use of imaging procedures has led to an increased discovery of incidental masses in the pituitary gland. Although the majority of pituitary incidentalomas are non-functioning benign adenomas but their increased prevalence poses a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. These masses may cause various hormonal disturbances as well as they might also be a component of multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes type 1 (MEN-1) or type 4 (MEN-4). In both syndromes, primary hyperparathyroidism frequently accompanies with pituitary adenomas. Herein we present a 56-year-old man with pituitary incidentaloma who is also detected primary hyperparathyroidism. Contrary to our expectations, any gene defects could be found related with neither MEN-1 nor MEN-4 in the genetic examination.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 1 (MEN1, Wermer syndrome) – group o а heterogeneous inherited deseases, caused by hyperlasia or neoplasia of several endocrine glands. The phenotype of MEN1 is broad, and over 20 different combinations of endocrine and non-endocrine metabolic manifestations have been described. This case demonstrates multiple formations of endocrine organs, starting non-classical with macroprolactonoma resistant to dopamine agonists therapy, other endocrine disorders developed gradually eventually: hyperparathyreoidism and hypoglycemia caused by pancreas lesions, produced proinsulin in high levels.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) is a rare autosomal-dominant disease. It is associated with a broad range of endocrine tumours, most frequently arising in the parathyroid glands, the pituitary and the pancreas. Most neuroendocrine tumours will be diagnosed in the pancreas as non-functioning neuroendocrine tumours or insulinomas. Forty-two percent of the patients will develop a gastrin-secreting neuroendocrine tumour, a gastrinoma. Gastrinomas in MEN-1 tend to be small, multiple and preferentially located in the duodenum. This paper will focus on the specific characteristics of gastrinomas in the setting of MEN-1 compared to sporadic gastrinomas. The developments in understanding the tumorigenesis of these tumours and the consequences for diagnosis and therapy will be discussed.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1) is a complex multi-system disease manifesting a diverse range of primary and secondary metabolic and neoplastic disorders. It is possible to improve patient prognosis by early disease detection and treatment. Regular biochemical and radiological screening for parathyroid, gastro-enteropancreatic, pituitary, intrathorasic and adrenal lesions forms the basis of surveillance. The likelihood of adverse sequelea such as renal and bone disease resulting from hyperparathyroidism, severe peptic ulceration and gastric carcinoidosis secondary to hypergastrinaemia can be ameliorated by early detection and management.

Inherited endocrinopathies, including multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1), multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 syndromes (MEN-2A, MEN-2B, familial medullary thyroid carcinoma), and inherited syndromes with pheochromocytoma (von Hippel-Lindau disease, neurofibromatosis type 1, others), comprise a heterogeneous group of cancer susceptibility syndromes that affect one or more components of the endocrine system. During the past several years, novel findings regarding genotype-phenotype correlation have highlighted the importance of establishing a genetic diagnosis in the treatment of these diseases. Here, we present a case-based review of recent advances in the genetics, diagnosis and management of inherited endocrinopathies.

Background: Multiple-endocrine-neoplasia-type-1 (MEN1) is an autosomal-dominant inherited disorder characterized by the combined occurrence of primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT), gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP), adenomas of the pituitary gland (APA), adrenal cortical tumors (ADR) and other tumors. As the tumors appear in an unpredictable schedule, uncertainty about screening programs is persisting. Objective: To optimize screening and to analyze possible differences in sporadic versus familial cases. Methods: We analyzed data of 419 individuals including 306 MEN-1 patients (138 isolated and168 familial cases out of 102 unrelated families). Results: A total of 683 tumors occurred consisting of 273 pHPT, 138 APA, 166 GEP, 57 ADR, 24 thymic- and bronchial-carcinoids as well as 25 neoplasms of other tissues. The age-related penetrance was determined as 10%, 35%, 67%, 81% and 100% at 20, 30, 40, 50 and 65 years respectively. Although pHPT being the most frequent first manifestation (41%), also GEP (22%) or APA (21 %) were found to be the first presentation. APA occurred significantly more frequent (p

As síndromes de neoplasias endócrinas múltiplas (NEM) incluem as do tipo 1 (MEN 1) e 2 (MEN 2), a síndrome de von Hippel-Lindau, neurofibromatose tipo 1 e o complexo de Carney. Estas são síndromes genéticas complexas decorrentes de ativação ou inativação de diferentes tipos de genes envolvidos na regulação da proliferação celular. Nesta revisão, discutiremos as manifestações clínicas e o acompanhamento da MEN 1, assim como o rastreamento genético de potenciais portadores de alterações no gene MEN 1. A MEN 1 inclui o desenvolvimento de hiperparatiroidismo primário multifocal, tumores de ilhotas pancreáticas e adenomas de hipófise. Além disso, alguns pacientes podem apresentar manifestações cutâneas como angiofibromas e colagenomas e ainda podem desenvolver outras neoplasias como tumores carcinóides, tumores de tiróide, adenomas de adrenal, lipomas, feocromocitomas e meningiomas. A MEN 1 é uma síndrome hereditária, transmitida de forma autossômica dominante e causada por mutação inativadora do gene MEN 1. O gene MEN 1 codifica uma proteína denominada "menin", que é um gene supressor tumoral. Vários estudos demonstraram sua importância na regulação da proliferação celular e confirmaram seu papel na patogênese da MEN 1. A identificação do gene MEN 1 e sua análise genética resultaram na possibilidade de monitoração de pacientes que ainda não apresentam manifestações clínicas associadas a esta síndrome e diagnóstico precoce e tratamento dos pacientes afetados. Tais medidas poderão implicar em sobrevida maior para estes pacientes. Estudos adicionais visando uma melhor compreensão da função e dos mecanismos de sinalização da proteína "menin" poderão propiciar alternativas terapêuticas para os pacientes que evoluem com malignização de tumores relacionados à MEN 1, podendo resultar em maior sobrevida.

We report the case of a patient presenting amenorrhea, hyperprolactinemia, headache and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) evidence of pituitary macroadenoma. The family history revealed that the patient's father had had a referred sporadic insulinoma, removed 25 yr before without evidence of other endocrine disorders. Physical examination evidenced a slight neck enlargement. Among biochemical and endocrinological assays performed, only hyperprolactinemia was observed. Neck ultrasonography (US) revealed a parathyroid enlargement and a 99mTcO4/MIBI scan showed two hyperplasic lesions. Considering the diagnostic suspect of multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN1), we performed abdominal US and NMR studies, showing a pancreatic lesion compatible with neuroendocrine tumor. A total body 111In-DTPA-d-Phe1 -octreotide scan (Octreoscan) was also carried out, evidencing no pituitary tumor uptake but high uptake of the abdominal lesion. After surgery, the histological examination confirmed the two parathyroid adenomas and four non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. When the patient was admitted for studying the pituitary lesion and for planning the opportune therapy, an early and partially subclinical stage of MEN1 was identified, potentially already clear but otherwise undiagnosed, and the genetic state of the patient's relatives, as possible carriers of DNA mutation, was checked. The DNA study for germline mutations confirmed the clinical diagnosis of MEN1 syndrome in the patient and evidenced the same MEN1 mutation in her father and twin sister. In this case report, we would like to underline that, still today, a correct anamnesis and physical examination are the cornerstone of clinical approach to the patient. Furthermore, initial good practice approach is necessary to plan the diagnostic iter, enabling clinicians to decide upon the best orientation and interpretation of the results among several complicated and expensive exams.

To study quality of life among patients living with a hereditary tumor syndrome, the small group with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) was selected. It is characterized by multifocal adenomas of the pancreas, parathyroid, anterior pituitary and other endocrine glands. Patients were assessed at an in-hospital stay and six months later at home. Patients at a specialist ward for MEN1 were recruited consecutively (n = 36) during one year. Eighty-one percent participated (n = 29). Four questionnaires were used: the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Impact of Event Scale (IES), the Life Orientation Test (LOT) and the Short Form-36 (SF-36). Psychosocial outcome measures (anxiety, depression, intrusion, avoidance) changed only marginally between the in hospital stay and six months later at home. However, depression increased for patients categorized as having a high burden of disease and treatment. Compared to population-based norm values, the SF-36 scores of the patient group MEN1were lower for General Health and Social Functioning. Optimism assessed at the hospital was a predictor of Mental Health six months later. Most MEN 1 patients (70%) were pessimists. Patients having a higher burden of disease and treatment are in need of support after discharge. Patients could easily be monitored with questionnaires and, when indicated, offered help for their psychosocial distress.

This is a consensus statement from an international group, mostly of clinical endocrinologists. MEN1 and MEN2 are hereditary cancer syndromes. The commonest tumors secrete PTH or gastrin in MEN1, and calcitonin or catecholamines in MEN2. Management strategies improved after the discoveries of their genes. MEN1 has no clear syndromic variants. Tumor monitoring in MEN1 carriers includes biochemical tests yearly and imaging tests less often. Neck surgery includes subtotal or total parathyroidectomy, parathyroid cryopreservation, and thymectomy. Proton pump inhibitors or somatostatin analogs are the main management for oversecretion of entero-pancreatic hormones, except insulin. The roles for surgery of most entero-pancreatic tumors present several controversies: exclusion of most operations on gastrinomas and indications for surgery on other tumors. Each MEN1 family probably has an inactivating MEN1 germline mutation. Testing for a germline MEN1 mutation gives useful information, but rarely mandates an intervention. The most distinctive MEN2 variants are MEN2A, MEN2B, and familial medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). They vary in aggressiveness of MTC and spectrum of disturbed organs. Mortality in MEN2 is greater from MTC than from pheochromocytoma. Thyroidectomy, during childhood if possible, is the goal in all MEN2 carriers to prevent or cure MTC. Each MEN2 index case probably has an activating germline RET mutation. RET testing has replaced calcitonin testing to diagnose the MEN2 carrier state. The specific RET codon mutation correlates with the MEN2 syndromic variant, the age of onset of MTC, and the aggressiveness of MTC; consequently, that mutation should guide major management decisions, such as whether and when to perform thyroidectomy.

Editor—Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1, OMIM 131100) is transmitted as an autosomal dominant trait with an equal sex distribution and close to full penetrance. Hyperparathyroidism occurs in over 90% of the cases and is invariably associated with multiglandular disease. In addition, the patients may develop tumours of the endocrine pancreas, the anterior pituitary, and the adrenal cortex, as well as lipomas and carcinoids.1The MEN1 tumour suppressor gene at 11q13 was cloned by positional cloning and the protein, menin, has been found to bind specifically to JunD leading to inhibition of JunD activated transcription.2-5 Following the initial description of the disease gene, over 200 MEN1 germline mutations scattered throughout the entire gene have been reported. The majority of these mutations are unique and no clear cut genotype-phenotype correlation has been established so far.3 4 6-13 To date, only a few reports of a founder effect in MEN 1 families have been published.10 14 15 In all the cases, the evidence for a founder chromosome was based on the presence of a shared disease haplotype and a MEN1 mutation, in combination with a common geographical origin of the families involved. To date, more than 30 rare single gene diseases, mostly autosomal recessive, have been identified in the Finnish population.16 17 The clustering of mutations in the Finnish population can be explained by the mechanisms of isolation, genetic drift, and founder effect. The relatively small founder population, the geographical isolation, and the internal migration movement in the 1500s led to the formation of numerous founder populations. The Finnish population has been widely used in linkage disequilibrium studies for mapping disease gene loci. By combining genetic and clinical investigations with careful genealogical studies, several founder chromosomes for various genetic diseases have been established.17-19 …

BACKGROUND The majority of reports describing the natural history and prognosis of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1) utilize phenotypic rather than molecular genetic criteria to establish a diagnosis of MEN 1. OBJECTIVES AND PATIENTS We sought to determine the spectrum of endocrine abnormality amongst 152 members (64 gene carriers and 88 noncarriers) of a large MEN 1 family in whom a determination of MEN 1 status had previously been made by phenotype screening. The predictive utility of both clinical and molecular screening techniques are described. RESULTS A novel IVS2-3 (C-G) MEN1 mutation was identified in affected members of this family. Seven (10%) of 71 individuals satisfying clinical diagnostic criteria for MEN 1 were found to be genetically negative (excluded by mutation analysis and haplotyping) for MEN 1. These cases of MEN 1 phenocopy comprised four cases of primary hyperparathyroidism, two 'nonsecretory' pituitary adenoma and one case of coincident prolactinoma and hyperparathyroidism. Three of the patients with hyperparathyroidism had previously required parathyroidectomy and each had achieved normocalcaemia following parathyroid resection. Predictive genetic testing prospectively identified three children with the MEN 1 genotype. Serum calcium was normal at the time of their initial molecular genetic diagnosis. In each case hyperparathyroidism subsequently developed during adolescence. CONCLUSION Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 phenocopy is an important differential diagnosis in patients exhibiting an multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 phenotype. This is a relevant consideration, particularly when the diagnosis of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 is made using sensitive, but nonspecific, criteria such as mild hyperparathyroidism, pituitary micoadenoma, and hyperprolactinaemia. Confirmatory genetic testing should be undertaken to confirm clinical diagnoses of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.

BACKGROUND Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) is an autosomal dominant tumor syndrome associated with parathyroid, gastroenteropancreatic (GEP), and pituitary neoplasia. Gastrinoma and GEP malignancy are common life-threatening endocrine complications of MEN-1. An effective management strategy for these disorders remains to be determined. The authors attempted to determine the role of the somatostatin analogue, octreotide, in ameliorating features of hypergastrinemic GEP neoplasia associated with MEN-1. METHODS Five MEN-1 patients with hypergastrinemia and either symptoms of GEP neoplasia or hepatic metastases received a trial of octreotide, 100 μg subcutaneously, three times daily for 3 months. RESULTS Treatment with octreotide was associated with a rapid symptomatic and biochemical response. In all patients serum gastrin fell to < 25% of the pretreatment value. The serum glycoprotein-αsubunit (a marker of enterochromaffin-like [ECL] cell hyperplasia, gastric carcinoidosis, and disseminated enteropancreatic malignancy) was elevated at baseline in three patients. In each case the serum glycoprotein-αsubunit normalized after treatment with octreotide. Hepatic metastases were present in two patients at baseline. The size of the metastases diminished by up to 15% during the period of octreotide treatment. Four patients reported symptoms prior to treatment: lethargy, easy fatigability, and generalized musculoskeletal discomfort. A marked symptomatic improvement occurred in each case. No patient experienced side effects related to octreotide therapy and all elected to remain on treatment after completion of the trial. CONCLUSIONS Octreotide is a safe and effective adjunct to surgical strategies for the management of GEP neoplasia in hypergastrinemic MEN-1 patients. Cancer 1999;86:2154–9. © 1999 American Cancer Society.

Author(s): Roman, John W; Logemann, Nicholas F; Adams, Erin | Abstract: Importance: We believe this to be the first documented report of multiple endocrine neoplasia type-1 (MEN-1) in which the diagnosis was suspected based purely on cutaneous findings. The patient was initially referred to the dermatology department for cosmetic concerns and had no overt symptoms, laboratory abnormalities, or known family history of MEN-1.Observations: The patient is a 28-year-old man who was referred to the dermatology department for evaluation and removal of skins lesions, later confirmed by biopsy to be facial angiofibromas and a truncal collagenoma. This combination of cutaneous findings was suspicious for a genodermatosis and genetic testing subsequently confirmed the diagnosis of MEN-1. The patient was referred for appropriate follow up and surveillance.Conclusions and Relevance: This case highlights the importance of vigilance on the part of dermatologists to be aware of subtle skin findings that may be characteristic of rare disorders and may have gone unrecognized by other providers and the patients themselves. In this respect, dermatologists are in a unique position given their specialized training in the recognition of inherited skin disorders. An early diagnosis of an inherited disorder, especially one with increased risk of malignancy, can allow for appropriate surveillance and potentially alter the course of the disease.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1) is characterized by the combined occurrence, to variable degree, of hyperparathyroidism (HPT) (85.7% of cases according to the French Registry of GENEM 1), tumors of the endocrine pancreas (49.6%), pituitary adenomas (38.4%) and, less frequently, adrenal tumors (9.6%) and neuroendocrine tumors (5.8%). Currently, diagnosis of MEN 1 is done in the fourth decade of life, but familial screening (using genetic tools whose diagnostic accuracy approaches 100%) has lowered the age of diagnosis. Screening for MEN 1 in a patient harboring an apparently sporadic tumor will depend on the endocrine gland involved. Extensive screening for MEN 1 in the presence of HPT will be conducted only when the familial history is suggestive, when parathyroid glands are hyperplastic or when multiple parathyroid adenomas have been found at surgery. All patients with an endocrine pancreas tumor need to be investigated for the presence of other endocrine lesions of MEN 1. Extensive screening for MEN 1 is only recommended when a patient with a pituitary tumor or an adrenal tumor has a familial history suggestive of MEN 1. Otherwise regular measurement of blood calcium and PTH levels seem sufficient. Extensive screening for endocrine lesions when MEN 1 is suspected involves hormone measurements and imaging procedures. For the diagnosis of HPT, calcemia and PTH 1-84 must be measured. In the absence of clinical symptoms, basal measurement of serum gastrin, glucose, insulin, glucagon, VIP, somatostatin and pancreatic polypeptide levels are combined with abdominal ultrasonography. When symptoms suggest the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, the secretin stimulation test is recommended. The diagnosis of a pituitary tumor is made by pituitary imaging and selected hormone assays (mainly PRL). To detect an adrenal tumor, CT scan is recommended, combined with serum potassium, urinary free cortisol and androgen measurement. When the diagnosis of MEN 1 is made, clinical and hormonal follow-up (once a year) and imaging surveillance (every 3-5 years) may be sufficient to detect new other endocrinopathies (unless suggestive clinical symptoms arise). Surgical management of each endocrine lesion must be done by skilled surgeons according to therapeutic protocols which have been discussed in detail. Genetic screening is an integral part of familial screening which may be conducted in collateral and in the offspring of MEN 1 patients. Obviously ethical principles (informed consent, etc.) must be respected. As it is now possible to detect presymptomatic gene carriers with a high degree of accuracy, follow-up is needed to make appropriate management decisions. The marked anxiety provoked by screening in an overtly asymptomatic healthy subject must not be underestimated. Conversely, a negative genetic diagnosis helps to reassure the subject and avoid repetitive and costly follow-up.

Prolactinomas and somatotropinomas are reported to be the pituitary lesions most frequently associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1). However, few reports have documented the full spectrum of pituitary disease in this condition. We report herein the clinical, biochemical (PRL, alpha-subunit, insulin-like growth factor-I, cortisol, and thyroid function), and radiological (magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography scan) characteristics of pituitary disease occurring in a single MEN 1 pedigree containing 165 MEN 1-affected members. Pituitary lesions were detected in 30 (18%) of 165 patients overall. In the subgroup of MEN 1 patients (n = 131) living after recognition of MEN 1 in the kindred, pituitary lesions were detected in 25 (19%). In 76% of patients with pituitary lesions, the diagnosis was made by prospective screening; the remainder sought medical attention for symptomatic pituitary disease. Prolactinomas accounted for 76%, and nonfunctioning adenomas accounted for the remaining 24%. alpha-Subunit elevation was observed in 29% of 41 patients tested, and an aggressive alpha-subunit secreting macroadenoma developed in 1 subject with a previously documented prolactinoma. Progression of pituitary disease occurred in 47% of patients with prolactinoma. There were no cases of Cushing's disease, thyrotropinoma, or somatotropinoma. We conclude that 1) in addition to prolactinomas, nonfunctioning pituitary tumors are common in MEN 1; 2) alpha-subunit hypersecretion is frequent in MEN 1; 3) comprehensive screening may identify many clinically significant but asymptomatic pituitary lesions; and 4) prolactinomas occurring in MEN 1 may behave more aggressively than sporadic prolactinomas.

In this article we reported a female patient with type 2 gastric neuroendocrine tumor (NET). The patient developed upper abdominal pain, acid reflux, heartburn, nausea, and vomiting without obvious cause 16 years ago. Later, a tumor was found in her stomach. Two years ago, a solid mass was found at the pancreatic head. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy showed positive result. Puncture biopsy showed the presence of a NET. The serum gastrin level was significantly increased (3,527 pg/mL) at presentation. A second gastroscopy showed polypoid uplifts in gastric body. Puncture biopsy confirmed the presence of a G2 NET in gastric body. The patient previously had received a pituitary tumor surgery and thyroid gland resection. The diagnosis was multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1). The treatments included sutent, lanreotide, and traditional Chinese herbs. In this article we described the diagnosis and treatment of a patient with MEN-1 accompanied with type 2 gastric NET, which may be clinically informative.

The syndrome of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1) is an autosomal dominant tumour disease of the neuroendocrine system with manifestations in the parathyroids, pancreas, duodenum and pituitary gland and rarely also in the stomach and thymus. Recently, the MEN 1 gene locus has been mapped to the long arm of chromosome 11. This gene most likely belongs to the tumour suppressor genes, the allelic loss of which causes tumour development. The pancreatic and duodenal tumours may metastasize, but usually have a low malignant potential. Clinically, most MEN 1 patients present between the age of 20 and 35 with hyperparathyroidism and/or Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are a diverse group of rare neoplasms. Commonly referred to as islet cell tumors, PanNETs are classified as functional or nonfunctional depending on their production of specific pancreatic endocrine hormones (e.g. insulin, gastrin, glucagon, and others) and association with the resultant clinical syndromes. While most PanNETs are sporadic, syndromic patients, in particular those with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) and von Hippel Lindau (VHL), are at increased risk of developing these tumors. Recent investigations of patients with sporadic and syndromic PanNETs have elucidated critical pathways in tumor development, such as mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling and its downstream growth factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Prognosis ranges from favorable for localized, low-grade neoplasms to poor for advanced, high-grade tumors. Regardless of the stage at presentation, surgery is the first-line therapy for patients with disease amenable to surgical resection. We favor formal pancreatectomy with conventional lymph node sampling for the vast majority of patients, either through open or laparoscopic techniques. Those with insulinomas, however, may be candidates for enucleation. Cytoreductive surgery is also recommended for patients with locoregional recurrences or hepatic metastases. Regional adjuvants such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and others are often employed in an attempt to palliate symptoms and prolong survival. Unfortunately, cytotoxic chemotherapy has been largely ineffective in treating patients with PanNETs. The somatostatin analogue octreotide, however, has been effective in palliating symptoms and slowing the progression of disease. Other promising systemic agents, including sunitinib and everolimus, have targeted critical PanNET signaling pathways. In summary, surgery remains the principal therapeutic strategy for patients with PanNETs, but continued research may identify more robust systemic therapies for those with advanced disease.

A 53-year-old man was referred to our hospital for treatment of two anterior mediastinal tumors. The anterior mediastinal tumors were resected by thymectomy under the probable diagnosis of double thymomas. The final pathological diagnosis was multiple thymic carcinoids. Although 20%–25% of patients with thymic carcinoid have a family history of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1), radiographic screening just after the operation did not detect any endocrine tumors. However, the patient had a urinary calculus 4 months 7 months after the operation. Endocrinological examination then revealed mild hypercalcemia, hypophosphatemia, hyperinsulinemia, and hyperprolactinemia. Radiologically, a parathyroid tumor and a pancreatic tumor were found. The patient was referred to a university hospital and a mutation of MEN-1 gene was detected. The diagnosis of MEN-1 was confirmed about 1 year after the operation.

Screening of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) patients is widely recommended because one-fifth succumb to malignant neoplasms. However, recommendations for screening modalities and intervals are based mostly on nonprospective data.Thirty-five of 48 MEN-1 patients were evaluated at least twice by an annual screening program in a single-center, prospective, nonrandomized study between 1997 and 2006. The screening program comprised anamnesis, clinical examination, imaging procedures, and extensive biochemical evaluations. Prospectively diagnosed lesions were evaluated separately from nonprospectively diagnosed lesions at first evaluation.The median age of the patients was 45 years (range = 15-70) at initial assessment. They were followed for a median of 72 months (range = 24-108) by a median of 6 (range = 2-10) evaluations. The vast majority of lesions were nonprospectively diagnosed at initial evaluation: 13 of 17 patients had primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT), 24 of 29 had pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs), and 4 of 4 had carcinoids. Vice versa adrenal lesions were mostly prospectively detected (18/23). Malignancy was observed in 10 patients (28%) in the initial assessment and without symptoms in 5 patients (9 PETs, 3 carcinoids). Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) of 29 patients detected 88 PETs which were followed for 157 patient years. The mean annual growing rate was 13.28 +/- 28.23 mm with respect to the baseline tumor diameter of 9 mm. In 35 patients the mean incidence of newly diagnosed PETs was 0.52/year. Adrenal lesions were invariably nonfunctional. A mean change in diameter of 6.7 +/- 23.44% was monitored and malignant transformation was absent.Most lesions are detected at initial screening, particularly malignant tumors. Computed tomography of the abdomen and chest did not identify additional lesions. The interval between screenings could be extended to 3 years based on annually calculated growth rates and the incidence of MEN-1-associated lesions. The assessment of calcium, gastrin, and prolactin is sufficient for biochemical screening in MEN-1.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by tumors of the parathyroid glands, the anterior pituitary, and the endocrine pancreas. Our patient was a 58-year-old man who manifested typical features of MEN-1 including primary hyperparathyroidism, lung carcinoid, and lipomas and insulinoma. He was admitted to our hospital because of recurrent hypoglycemia and a growth of pancreatic tumors. The first operation for insulinoma was performed when he was 20 years old. We found a germline mutation of the MEN1 gene (E45G, exon 2) in this patient. According to these examinations and his clinical course, the patient was diagnosed as having a recurrence of insulinoma. He subsequently underwent surgery for the pancreatic tumors. The majority of these tumor cells were immunohistochemically positive for insulin and negative for glucagon. A few nodules showed immunohistochemical staining positivity for glucagon but they were negative for insulin. Although it is uncommon for patients with MEN1 to exhibit insulinoma and glucagonoma, this case suggests the need for careful analysis of pancreatic tumors in patients with MEN1.

Summary Objective Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1) is an autosomal dominant syndrome characterized by primary hyperparathyroidism, pituitary neoplasia and foregut lineage neuroendocrine tumours. It has also been associated with premature cardiovascular death. As diabetes is a risk factor for increased cardiovascular mortality we investigated the prevalence and clinical correlates of glycaemic abnormalities in a large MEN 1 kindred. Patients and design The glycaemic status of 72 MEN 1 affected and 133 unaffected members of a single large MEN 1 pedigree was assessed. Fasting glucose results were categorized and compared using WHO criteria. Associations between glycaemic status and MEN 1 phenotype were assessed. Results Thirteen (18·1%) patients with MEN 1 compared to 5 (3·8%) control patients were diabetic (P

A case of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1) with a clinical manifestation of pyonephrosis is reported. A 47-year-old woman with a 14-year history of renal stones was initially seen with pyonephrosis. The patient was found to have elevated serum levels of parathyroid hormone and growth hormone. Radiologic examinations demonstrated an ectopic parathyroid tumor and a pituitary tumor. She was diagnosed as having MEN 1.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1) is an autosomal dominant inherited disorder characterized by tumors of the enteropancreas, parathyroid and anterior pituitary. The MEN 1 gene was recently cloned, and germline mutations of the gene have been demonstrated in cases of MEN 1. Here, we report a Japanese family with a germline mutation of the MEN 1 gene. The proband (44 y.o., male) had primary hyperparathyroidism (PHP) and pancreatic carcinoid, and his older sister (50 y.o.) had a history of parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism at the age of 40. Clinical examination revealed no evidence of PHP or other MEN 1-related tumors in his son. Direct sequencing analysis revealed a heterozygous germline mutation (1001delC) at codon 297 in exon 6 of the MEN 1 gene in the proband and his son. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) was also found in the resected parathyroid tissue of the proband. The deletion of cytosine 1001 observed in this case induces a frame shift, which causes the appearance of a stop codon (TAG) at codon 367. This mutation appears to be associated with tumors of the endocrine tissues in the cases studied.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1) is inherited as an autosomal dominant disorder, characterized by neoplasia and hyperplasia in specific endocrine organs. The MEN 1 gene, which is most probably a tumor suppressor gene, has been localized to a region of approximately 900 kb on chromosome 11q13. The nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B) is a transcription factor with pleiotropic expression, which is involved in the regulation of expression of many cellular genes. The p50/p65 heterodimer is the most abundant form of NF-kappa B. The gene encoding the p65 subunit (NF-kappa B3/REL A) was recently localized in the 900-kb MEN 1 region and was considered a good candidate gene for MEN 1. The structure and nucleotide sequence of the NF-kappa B3 coding region in MEN 1 patients were compared with those of non-MEN 1 subjects, to determine the potential role of this gene in MEN 1 tumorigenesis. Southern blot analysis with constitutional DNA from probands of 14 independent MEN 1 families and DNA from four MEN 1 tumor specimens did not reveal any structural abnormality of the NF-kappa B3 gene. Direct sequencing of cDNAs from two affected subjects from 2 different MEN 1 families, as well as nucleotide sequence analysis of exon/intron boundaries in these patients, did not reveal MEN 1-specific point mutations or other small structural aberrations in the NF-kappa B3 gene. These results make it very unlikely that the NF-kappa B3 gene is the gene responsible for the development of MEN 1.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1) is inherited as an autosomal dominant disorder, characterized by hyperplasia and neoplasia in several endocrine organs. The MEN 1 gene, which is most probably a tumor suppressor gene, has been localized to a 900-kb region on chromosome 11q13. The human phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C beta 3 (PLC beta 3) gene, which is located within this region, was considered to be a good candidate for the MEN 1 gene. In this study, the structure and expression of the PLC beta 3 gene in MEN 1 patients were investigated in more detail, to determine its potential role in MEN 1 tumorigenesis. Southern blot analysis, using blood and tumor DNA from affected persons from seven different MEN 1 families, did not reveal structural abnormalities in the PLC beta 3 gene. To detect possible point mutations, or other small structural aberrations, direct sequencing of PLC beta 3 cDNAs from two affected persons from two different MEN 1 families was performed, but no MEN 1-specific abnormalities were revealed. Several common nucleotide sequence polymorphisms were detected in these cDNAs, proving that both alleles of the PLC beta 3 gene were expressed and analyzed. In conclusion, these results exclude the PLC beta 3 gene as a candidate gene for MEN 1.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1) is an autosomal dominantly inherited disorder characterized by parathyroid hyperplasia, anterior pituitary adenomas and neoplasms of the endocrine cells of the gastroenteric tract. It has been established that also other tissues exhibit excessive proliferation associated to the MEN 1 syndrome: carcinoids (bronchial and intestinal), lipomas (visceral and cutaneous), thyroid adenomas and goiter, and adrenal gland cortex adenomas. The men 1 gene has been mapped by genetic studies to the long arm of human chromosome 11, region q12-13. Genetic analysis of families and tumoral deletion mapping made possible to narrow the men 1 region to a 5 cM interval on chromosome 11q12-13. Thirteen marker complexes (17 DNA probes) were found to be linked to the men 1 gene and they span a 14% meiotic recombination with the men 1 locus in the middle. We report a genetic study on 103 subjects from 7 collected MEN 1-kindreds, six Italian and one German, including 30 affected individuals. By linkage analysis to 9 DNA markers (10 DNA probes) of the chromosome region where the men 1 gene maps (11q12-13), we identified 10 mutant gene carriers. The predicted MEN 1 diagnosis was clinically confirmed for 2 of these identified carriers. A predictive accuracy of this genetic test can reach up to 99.5% when it is possible to exclude meiotic crossing-over between the analyzed DNA markers and the disease locus.

The gene responsible for multiple endocrine neoplasia type I (MEN-1) syndrome has been mapped to chromosome 11q13. It appears to function as a tumour-suppressor gene analogous to that for retinoblastoma and allelic losses involving the wild-type of the MEN-1 allele have been found in parathyroid and pancreatic endocrine tumours of MEN-1 patients. No genetic information has been provided so far on non-endocrine malignancies that may occur in MEN-1 patients. A case of exocrine pancreatic adenocarcinoma presenting as the terminal event in a woman with a long standing history of MEN-1 syndrome and multiple endocrine tumours of the pancreas was investigated for possible allelic losses at the MEN-1 gene locus using restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) closely linked to the MEN-1 gene and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for D11S533 locus. No allelic losses were found in tumour tissue with two informative RFLPs (D11S97, D11S146) or with PCR analysis. These findings suggest that the MEN-1 gene does not confer a predisposition to develop tumours other than those that typify the syndrome.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1) is an inherited disease of the neuroendocrine cell system affecting primarily the parathyroids, pancreas, duodenum and the anterior pituitary. The pancreatic and duodenal tumours may metastasize, but generally have a low malignant potential. The diagnosis of MEN 1 is usually made in the second decade of life and based on the involvement of at least two organs and a family history. The recent discovery of the MEN 1 locus on the centromeric region of the long arm of chromosome 11 may become a further diagnostic criterion. The use of flanking DNA markers permits presymptomatic testing for MEN 1 in affected families.

e21136 Background: We treated a patient with breast cancer associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1). There are only few studies of the development of breast cancer in patients diagnosed with MEN1 syndrome. Methods: We found that patient had a pituitary macroadenoma that secretes prolactin (prolactinomas), increased serum concentration of calcium, 4.09 mmol/l and increased serum concentration of PTH, 212 pg/ml. Neck ultrasound and scintigrafy showed suspicious adenoma in lower left parathyroid gland. A computed tomography scan of the abdomen revealed a tumor mass in the body of the pancreas and adenoma in the left suprarenal gland. We diagnosed multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1). Results: MEN1 occurs as a result of inactivating mutations of the MEN1 gene (MEN1), located on chromosome11q13. Results indicate that menin is a direct activator of ERalpha function. In a clinical study, in Kagawa, with 65 ER-positive breast cancer samples-all of which had been treated with tamoxifen for 2-5 years as adjuvant therapies-menin-positive tumors had a worse outcome than menin-negative ones. This indicated that menin can function as a transcriptional regulator of ERalpha and is a possible predictive factor for tamoxifen resistance.These results demonstrate that allelic deletions of the 13q12-14 region occur in some pituitary adenomas and 16% of parathyroid adenomas. Conclusions: As recent molecular studies have suggested genetic mutations in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, this syndrome may possibly predispose patients to breast cancer.This possibility cannot be evaluated definitively on the basis of a single case report; additional observations and studies are necessary to investigate this hypothesis further.