Search

Promoters that control gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae only in a sporulation-specific manner have previously been isolated from a genomic yeast DNA library fused to a promoterless Escherichia coli lacZ gene. Two novel sporulation-specific genes, SPS18 and SPS19, were isolated using this technique. These genes are divergently controlled by the same promoter but with SPS18 expressed at four times the level of SPS19. Deletion analysis has shown that the promoter elements that exert sporulation control on each of the genes overlap, having a common 25 bp sequence located within the intergenic region. SPS18 encodes a 34-KDa protein of 300 amino acids that contains a putative zinc-binding domain and a region of highly basic residues that could target the protein to the nucleus. SPS19 encodes a 31-KDa protein of 295 amino acids, which has a peroxisomal targeting signal (SKL) at its C terminus; this protein belongs to the family of non-metallo short-chain alcohol dehydrogenases. A null mutation deleting the intergenic promoter prevented expression of both genes, and when homozygous in diploids, reduced the extent of sporulation four-fold; the spores that did form were viable, but failed to become resistant to ether, and were more sensitive to lytic enzymes. This phenotype reflects a defect in spore wall maturation, indicating that the product of at least one of the genes functions during the process of spore wall formation. Therefore these genes belong to the class of late sporulation-specific genes that are sequentially activated during the process of meiosis and spore formation.

The temporal determinants of the G1 cell cycle interval were investigated using nine mammalian cell lines. In each case, cells were allowed to proliferate for many cell cycles under conditions that slowed progress through S phase without an equivalent impairment of overall mass accumulation. This disproportionate inhibition of progress through the cell cycle caused newly produced cells to be more massive than usual. Under these growth conditions, the determinants of the length of the G1 interval became evident. For two cell lines, HeLa S3 and NIH 3T3, a protracted S phase, and the resultant increase in mass, resulted in a dramatically shortened G1 interval. Thus, for these cell lines, a major portion of G1 time exists to accommodate mass accumulation needed to initiate the subsequent S phase. Nevertheless, under conditions that protracted S phase and shortened the G1 interval, cells still exhibited a measurable G1 time, reflecting the stage-specific activities within G1. One activity that may be responsible for this obligatory G1 time is the synthesis of a labile protein. For other cells studied here, protraction of S phase also caused proliferating cells to become more massive, but in these cases there was no diminution of the G1 time. For these cells, the entire G1 interval must accommodate G1-specific activities necessary to initiate a new cell cycle. A unifying view of the G1 interval recognizes the two distinct influences that determine the time spent in G1: the need to accumulate sufficient mass to initiate a new DNA-division sequence; and the stage-specific events necessary for the subsequent S phase. The length of the G1 interval is dictated by the longer of these two time-consuming activities.