Search

Cultures of proliferating epithelial cells were established from explants of normal human oral epithelium from healthy young volunteers. The epithelial cells were found permissive for herpes simplex virus type 1 and type 2, coxsackie virus A-4 and A-16, adenovirus type 5, measles vaccine, rubella and influenza type A virus-. Medium from DEAE-pretreated epithelial cultures infected with two subtypes of human immunodeficiency virus-1 showed an increasing content of virusprotein with time by antigen ELISA testing. In contrast there was no evidence of infection with coxsackie virus type B-2, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus and varicella zoster virus. Treatment of the epithelial cells with a non-cytotoxic dose of cancer chemotherapeutic prior to or after infection with coxsackie virus A-4 or herpes simplex virus type 1 influenced the virus production dependent on both compound, mode of application, and virus. Adriamycin (doxorubicin) in low dose was found to stimulate the production of the two viruses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To resolve an exceptional clustering of Cutibacterium avidum prosthetic valve infective endocarditis (IE) at a single heart center., Methods: During a period of 21 months, three patients experienced C. avidum bacteremia 24-128 days after aortic valve replacement. Operative procedures and electronic prescriptions of antimicrobials were surveyed, and bacterial isolates were genome sequenced., Results: The prosthetic valves were inserted by separate surgical teams. In one case, echocardiographic confirmation of IE was not achieved until 4 months after the first positive blood culture, but the causative agents were irrefutably documented in all cases by culture, or amplification of bacterial deoxyribonucleic acid, from removed prosthetic material. Whole-genome sequencing clustered isolates to a distinctive subgroup of the species but did not suggest inter-patient transmission of isolates., Conclusions: Despite vigorous sampling of blood and tissue, detection of C. avidum was not unconditional, neither by culture nor polymerase chain reaction test. The causative agent is likely underreported and should be meticulously searched for in culture-negative prosthetic valve endocarditis., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no competing interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The naming of prokaryotes is governed by the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (ICNP) and partially by the International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi and Plants (ICN). Such codes must be able to determine names of taxa in a universal and unambiguous manner, thus serving as a common language across different fields and activities. This unity is undermined when a new code of nomenclature emerges that overlaps in scope with an established, time-tested code and uses the same format of names but assigns different nomenclatural status values to the names. The resulting nomenclatural confusion is not beneficial to the wider scientific community. Such ambiguity is expected to result from the establishment of the 'Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes Described from DNA Sequence Data' ('SeqCode'), which is in general and specific conflict with the ICNP and the ICN. Shortcomings in the interpretation of the ICNP may have exacerbated the incompatibility between the codes. It is reiterated as to why proposals to accept sequences as nomenclatural types of species and subspecies with validly published names, now implemented in the SeqCode, have not been implemented by the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes (ICSP), which oversees the ICNP. The absence of certain regulations from the ICNP for the naming of as yet uncultivated prokaryotes is an acceptable scientific argument, although it does not justify the establishment of a separate code. Moreover, the proposals rejected by the ICSP are unnecessary to adequately regulate the naming of uncultivated prokaryotes. To provide a better service to the wider scientific community, an alternative proposal to emend the ICNP is presented, which would result in Candidatus names being regulated analogously to validly published names. This proposal is fully consistent with previous ICSP decisions, preserves the essential unity of nomenclature and avoids the expected nomenclatural confusion.