Search

Background: Patients with severe allergic asthma (SAA) and blood eosinophil count ≥0.3x10 9 /L are eligible for multiple biologics. Several of them showed benefits on nasal polyps (NP), a frequent comorbidity of the severe asthma, but comparative studies on their effectiveness in the association SAA-NP are currently lacking. OUR OBJECTIVE: was to compare the effectiveness of anti-IgE, anti-IL5/R and anti-IL4R in patients with SAA-NP in real-world settings., Methods: A real-world multicentre observational study was realized including patients with SAA-NP treated by anti-IgE, anti-IL5/R or anti-IL4R for 6 months. We analyzed the nasal and respiratory symptoms, the number of asthma attacks and salbutamol use/week, acute sinusitis and severe exacerbation rates, the asthma control score, the lung function parameters, the NP endoscopic score, the sinus imaging, and the blood eosinophil count 6 months before and after treatment., Results: One hundred seven patients with SAA-NP were included: 35 treated by anti-IgE, 38 by anti-IL5/R and 34 by anti-IL4R. All the biologics showed similar effectiveness in improving asthma outcomes (symptoms, exacerbation rate, asthma control, lung function). Despite the amelioration of almost all rhinological parameters and sinus imaging in each group, greater benefits were found in the anti-IL4R group in terms of loss of smell (odds ratio OR 3.64[1.3-11.1], p = 0.017), nasal obstruction (OR12.00[2.00-23.10], p = 0.023), and NP endoscopic score (OR 18.10[4.43-24.50])., Conclusion: All three biological classes improved asthma and sino-nasal outcomes in patients with SAA-NP. However, anti-IL4R was superior in improving the smell, nasal obstruction, and NP endoscopic size. Larger comparative studies are needed to confirm our results., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Angelica Tiotiu reports a relationship with AstraZeneca, GSK, Sanofi that includes: board membership, consulting or advisory, and speaking and lecture fees. Nicolas Migueres reports a relationship with AstraZeneca that includes speaking and lecture fees. Francisco-Javier Gonzalez-Barcala reports a relationship with ALK, AstraZeneca, Bial, Chiesi, Gebro Pharma, GSK, Menarini, Rovi, Roxall, Sanofi, Stallergenes Greer, Teva that includes: board membership, consulting or advisory, and speaking and lecture fees. Pauline Roux reports a relationship with AstraZeneca, GSK, Sanofi that includes: board membership, speaking and lecture fees. Jean-Philippe Oster reports a relationship with AstraZeneca, GSK, Sanofi that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Natacha Moutard reports a relationship with ASV that includes: attending meetings. Frédéric de Blay reports a relationship with Aimmune, ALK, GSK, Regeneron, Stallergenes Greer that includes: grants, speaking and lecture fees. Philippe Bonniaud reports a relationship with AstraZeneca, GSK, Sanofi that includes: speaking and lecture fees., (Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Exposure-related changes in exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and sputum eosinophils have not been thoroughly compared in the investigation of occupational asthma., Objective: This study aimed at comparing the accuracies of the changes in FeNO concentrations and sputum eosinophil counts in identifying asthmatic reactions induced by occupational agents during specific inhalation challenges (SICs)., Methods: This retrospective multicenter study included 321 subjects who completed an assessment of FeNO and sputum eosinophils before and 24 h after SICs with various occupational agents, of whom 156 showed a positive result., Results: Post-challenge changes in FeNO and sputum eosinophils showed similar accuracies, with areas under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.78 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.72-0.83) and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.76-0.86), respectively. Increases in FeNO level ≥ 13 ppb and sputum eosinophils ≥ 1.25% were identified as the optimal threshold values for differentiating positive from negative SICs. Using these thresholds, the changes in FeNO and sputum eosinophils each achieved a ≥ 95% specificity but a low sensitivity (55% and 62%, respectively). FeNO and sputum eosinophils showed discordant increases in 38% of subjects with a positive SIC. Combining either a rise in FeNO ≥ 13 ppb or an increase in sputum eosinophils ≥ 1.25% increased the sensitivity to 77%., Conclusions: Increases in FeNO concentration and/or sputum eosinophils after exposure to occupational agents strongly support a diagnosis of occupational asthma. The assessment of both markers of airway inflammation should be regarded as a reliable complementary tool to spirometry for identifying bronchial responses to occupational agents., (© 2024 European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is a bronchoscopic procedure for patients with severe uncontrolled asthma, but randomized controlled studies of its efficacy in severe asthma with frequent exacerbations are lacking. The current aim was to assess BT efficacy in this patient population., Methods: Thirty patients with asthma (GINA 5) who had experienced at least four severe exacerbations in the preceding year were randomized to BT (n = 15) or control groups (n = 15). All patients had four follow-up visits over the following 15 months, corresponding to 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the last procedure for the BT group. The primary outcome was number of exacerbations at 15 months after inclusion (i.e. 12 months after bronchial thermoplasty)., Results: All but three patients had received an asthma biologic without receiving benefit. In the year preceding enrollment, patients in the BT group had an average of five exacerbations, compared with six among controls. For patients in the BT group, oral steroid intake was 9.3 mg/d, compared with 11.0 mg/d among controls. The BT group had 1.58 fewer severe exacerbations (mean, 6.09) compared with controls (mean, 8.28) in the 12-month period after the therapy (p = 0.047). Oral steroid intake during follow-up after BT was significantly lower in the BT group (ratio vs controls: 0.61; p = 0.0002). Quality-of-life measures between inclusion and the last visit were significantly improved in the BT group, but not among controls. Few mild to moderate adverse events were reported, and all were controlled within days., Conclusion: In patients with severe asthma and frequent severe exacerbations, BT significantly decreased the rate of severe exacerbations and oral steroid intake and led to improved quality of life during the 15 months after inclusion. BT appears to offer a therapeutic option for severe asthma with frequent exacerbations., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Pr F. De Blay reports financial support was provided by ADIRAL. Pr F. De Blay reports financial support was provided by SOS Oxygène. Pr F. De Blay reports financial support was provided by France Oxygen. Pr F. De Blay reports financial support was provided by Elivie SAS. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Background: Assessment of IgE-mediated sensitization to flour allergens is widely used to investigate flour-induced occupational asthma. The diagnostic efficiency of detecting specific IgE antibodies (sIgEs) against wheat and rye flour, however, has not been thoroughly compared with other diagnostic procedures., Objective: We sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of sIgE against wheat and rye compared with specific inhalation challenge (SIC) with flour as the reference standard., Methods: This retrospective multicenter study included 264 subjects who completed an SIC with flour in eight tertiary centers, of whom 205 subjects showed a positive SIC result., Results: Compared with SIC, sIgE levels of 0.35 kU A /L or greater against wheat and rye provided similar sensitivities (84% to 85%, respectively), specificities (71% to 78%), positive predictive values (91% to 93%), and negative predictive values (56% to 61%). Increasing the threshold sIgE value to 5.10 kU A /L for wheat and to 6.20 kU A /L for rye provided a specificity of 95% or greater and further enhanced the positive predictive value to 98%. Among subjects with a positive SIC, those who failed to demonstrate sIgE against wheat and rye (n = 26) had significantly lower total serum IgE level and blood and sputum eosinophil counts and a lesser increase in postchallenge FeNO compared with subjects with a detectable sIgE., Conclusion: High levels of sIgE against wheat and/or rye flour strongly support a diagnosis of flour-induced occupational asthma without the need to perform an SIC. The absence of detectable sIgE against wheat and rye in subjects with a positive SIC seems to be associated with lower levels of T H 2 biomarkers., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Exposure to disinfectants and cleaning products (DCPs) is now a well-established risk factor for work-related asthma (WRA). However, questions remain on the specific causal agents and pathophysiological mechanisms. Few studies have also reported an association between DCPs and rhinitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This review discusses the recent evidence pertaining to airway diseases attributable to occupational exposure to DCPs. In contrast to other agents, the incidence of WRA due to DCPs has increased over time. The use of DCPs in spray form has clearly been identified as an added risk factor. The mechanisms for WRA associated with DCPs remain poorly studied; however, both allergic and nonallergic responses have been described, with irritant mechanisms thought to play a major role. An early diagnostic workup based on clinical assessment accompanied by evaluation of lung function and immunological and airway inflammatory markers is important to guide optimal care and exposure avoidance to the implicated agent. Future research should focus on the effects of "green" products, pathophysiological mechanisms, and quantitative exposure assessment including the use of barcode-based methods to identify specific agents. There is an urgent need to strengthen preventive measures and interventions to reduce the burden of airway diseases associated with DCPs., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: Background: Clinical heterogeneity in sensitizer-induced occupational asthma (OA) and its relationship to airway inflammatory profiles remain poorly elucidated. Objectives: To further characterize interactions between induced sputum inflammatory patterns, asthma-related outcomes, and the high- or low-molecular-weight category of causal agents in a large cohort of patients with OA., Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, cross-sectional study of 296 patients with OA confirmed by a positive specific inhalation challenge who completed induced sputum assessment before and 24 hours after challenge exposure., Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that sputum eosinophilia ≥3% was significantly associated with a high dose of inhaled corticosteroid (OR [95%CI], 1.31 [1.11 1.55] for each 250-μg increment in daily dose), short-acting ß2-agonist use less than once a day (3.54 [1.82-7.00]), and the level of baseline nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness (mild, 2.48 [1.21-5.08]; moderate/severe, 3.40 [1.44-8.29]). Sputum neutrophilia ≥76% was associated with age (1.06 [1.01-1.11]), male sex (3.34 [1.29-9.99]), absence of corticosteroid use (5.47 [2.09-15.16]), use of short-acting ß2-agonists once or more a day (4.09 [1.71-10.01]), ≥2 severe exacerbations during the previous 12 months at work (4.22 [1.14-14.99]), and isolated early reactions during the specific inhalation challenge (4.45 [1.85-11.59])., Conclusions: The findings indicate that sputum inflammatory patterns in patients with OA are associated with distinct phenotypic characteristics and further highlight the differential effects of neutrophils and eosinophils on asthma-related outcomes. These associations between inflammatory patterns and clinical characteristics share broad similarities with findings reported in nonoccupational asthma and are not related to the type of causal agent.

The environment of an asthmatic patient can contain numerous sources of pollutants that degrade the quality of indoor air and have major repercussions on the occurrence and control of asthma. Assessment and improvement of the quality of indoor air should be assigned a major role in pneumology and allergology consultations. Characterization of an asthmatic's environment entails a search for biological pollutants with mite allergens, mildew, and allergens resulting from the proximity of pets. It is important to evaluate the chemical pollution represented by exposure to volatile organic compounds, which are increasingly present in our lodgings. Active or second-hand smoking must in all circumstances be sought out and quantified. Assessment of the environment is mediated by several methods, of which the application depends not only on the pollutant sought out, but also on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), which has an essential role in quantification of biological pollutants. Attempts at expulsion of the different indoor environment pollutants is mediated by indoor environment advisors, whose efforts are aimed at obtaining reliable evaluation and control of indoor air. Implemented as a form of tertiary prevention, their methods are conducive to improved asthma control, in adults as well as children., (Copyright © 2023 SPLF. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody (omalizumab) has demonstrated efficacy in severe atopic asthma. However, few studies have assessed its efficacy in non-atopic and even less in T2-low severe asthma. The objective was to determinate the omalizumab response according to atopic status., Methods: This retrospective, real-world study was performed in the Chest Diseases Department of Strasbourg University Hospital from January 1, 2006, to June 30, 2017. The response to omalizumab was assessed in 139 patients 4, 6, and 12 months after treatment and compared to data collected prior to omalizumab initiation., Results: Forty-four patients (31.7%) had severe non-atopic asthma and 95 (68.3%) had a severe atopic asthma. In the non-atopic group, omalizumab significantly reduced the severe exacerbation rate by 44% (95% CI 18-64%, p  < 0.05), 43% (CI 95% 20-60%, p  < 0.05), and 54% (CI 95% 36-67%, p  < 0.05), at 4, 6 and 12 months, respectively. A trend toward improvement in FEV1, asthma control and oral corticosteroid use was also observed. These results were not significantly different from those obtained in atopic asthmatics except a more effective oral corticosteroid sparing in atopic group ( p  < 0.05). Similar reduction of severe exacerbation rates were observed in T2-low asthma subgroup (non-atopic, non-eosinophilic)., Conclusion: Omalizumab was effective in severe asthma, regardless of atopic status.

Asthma, rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis (AD) are interrelated clinical phenotypes that partly overlap in the human interactome. The concept of "one-airway-one-disease," coined over 20 years ago, is a simplistic approach of the links between upper- and lower-airway allergic diseases. With new data, it is time to reassess the concept. This article reviews (i) the clinical observations that led to Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA), (ii) new insights into polysensitization and multimorbidity, (iii) advances in mHealth for novel phenotype definitions, (iv) confirmation in canonical epidemiologic studies, (v) genomic findings, (vi) treatment approaches, and (vii) novel concepts on the onset of rhinitis and multimorbidity. One recent concept, bringing together upper- and lower-airway allergic diseases with skin, gut, and neuropsychiatric multimorbidities, is the "Epithelial Barrier Hypothesis." This review determined that the "one-airway-one-disease" concept does not always hold true and that several phenotypes of disease can be defined. These phenotypes include an extreme "allergic" (asthma) phenotype combining asthma, rhinitis, and conjunctivitis. Rhinitis alone and rhinitis and asthma multimorbidity represent two distinct diseases with the following differences: (i) genomic and transcriptomic background (Toll-Like Receptors and IL-17 for rhinitis alone as a local disease; IL-33 and IL-5 for allergic and non-allergic multimorbidity as a systemic disease), (ii) allergen sensitization patterns (mono- or pauci-sensitization versus polysensitization), (iii) severity of symptoms, and (iv) treatment response. In conclusion, rhinitis alone (local disease) and rhinitis with asthma multimorbidity (systemic disease) should be considered as two distinct diseases, possibly modulated by the microbiome, and may be a model for understanding the epidemics of chronic and autoimmune diseases., (© 2023 The Authors. Allergy published by European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Dysphonia is a frequent comorbidity of asthma and has been suggested to be a local side effect of inhaled corticosteroids due to laryngeal candidiasis. We hypothesized that dysphonia in asthmatics was not due to laryngeal organic lesions but to laryngeal dysfunction during phonation (LDP)., Objective: We compared the frequency of LDP in female asthmatic patients treated with inhaled corticosteroids to female controls., Methods: We compared 68 asthmatic female patients to 53 female control subjects. Pulmonary function tests were performed and the asthmatic patients classified according to the level of inhaled corticosteroids. Dysphonia was defined as a Vocal Handicap Index ≥18 or GRBAS score ≥2. All patients underwent video laryngo-strobe examination, analyzed blindly and separately by two otolaryngologists, describing mucosal changes, LDP, or Organic lesions linked to Laryngeal Dysfunction during Phonation (OLDP)., Results: 66.2% of the asthmatic patients exhibited dysphonia and 11.3% of controls (p < 0.001). No laryngeal candidiasis was found, only 3 patients presented laryngeal mucosa inflammation. LDP was observed in 60.3% of asthmatic patients and 18.9% of controls (p < 0.001), and no difference was found for OLDP (11.8% vs. 13.2%). No association was made between LDP, the dosage of inhaled corticosteroid, and bronchial obstruction., Conclusions: Asthmatic patients were more dysphonic than control subjects. This phenomenon was not explained by mucosal inflammation, laryngeal candidiasis or OLDP. Asthmatic patients had more LDP than controls. There was no relation between LDP, inhaled corticosteroids dosage or bronchial obstruction. These results change our view of inhaled corticosteroid side effects in female asthmatic patients., (© 2022 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Allergy published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.)

Background: Quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs) are used extensively for cleaning and disinfection and have been documented in scattered reports as a cause of occupational asthma (OA) through bronchoprovocation tests (BPTs)., Objective: To examine the clinical, functional, and inflammatory profile of QAC-induced OA compared with OA caused by other low-molecular weight (LMW) agents., Methods: The study was conducted in a retrospective multicenter cohort of 871 subjects with OA ascertained by a positive BPT. Subjects with QAC-induced OA (n = 22) were identified based on a positive BPT to QACs after exclusion of those challenged with cleaning products or disinfectants that contained other potential respiratory sensitizers. They were compared with 289 subjects with OA caused by other LMW agents., Results: Most subjects with QAC-induced OA were working in the health care sector (n = 14). A twofold or greater increase in the postchallenge level of nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness was recorded in eight of 11 subjects with QAC-induced OA (72.7%) and in 49.7% of those with OA caused by other LMW agents. Although sputum assessment was available in only eight subjects with QAC-induced OA, they showed a significantly greater median (interquartile) increase in sputum eosinophils (18.1% [range, 12.1% to 21.1%]) compared with those with OA caused by other LMW agents (2.0% [range, 0% to 5.2%]; P < .001)., Conclusions: This study indicates that QAC-induced OA is associated with a highly eosinophilic pattern of airway response and provides further evidence supporting the sensitizing potential of QACs. The findings highlight the heterogeneous nature of the pathobiologic pathways involved in OA caused by LMW agents., (Copyright © 2021 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: We report a case of an exceptional syndromic association of apparently congenital rhinobronchial dystrophy associated with congenital anosmia and common variable immunodeficiency in a twelve-year-old girl., Case Summary: This young girl, born in 2000, consulted for the first time in 2012 for recurrent respiratory tract infections, refractory to all forms of treatment, starting in early childhood, associated with congenital anosmia and severe atrophic rhinitis as well as common variable immunodeficiency. The laboratory work-up essentially revealed IgG4 deficiency and imaging demonstrated bronchiectasis (lingula), multiple tracheobronchial diverticula, atrophic rhinitis and congenital anosmia with agenesis of the olfactory bulbs and sulci., Discussion: After eliminating a number of differential diagnoses, we were left with the problem of the aetiology, the possible links between these various symptoms and the genetic basis for this apparently congenital complex rhinobronchial disease associated with common variable immunodeficiency. Do these various symptoms correspond to a chance association or an exceptional congenital syndrome that has not yet been identified in the literature?, Conclusion: A review of the clinical and genetic literature did not enable us to propose a single diagnosis for these symptoms or this complex syndrome., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)