Search

Introduction: Some COVID-19 patients evolve to severe lung injury and systemic hyperinflammatory syndrome triggered by both the coronavirus infection and the subsequent host-immune response. Accordingly, the use of immunomodulatory agents has been suggested but still remains controversial. Our working hypothesis is that methylprednisolone pulses and tacrolimus may be an effective and safety drug combination for treating severe COVID-19 patients. Methods: and analysis: TACROVID is a randomized, open-label, single-center, phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone pulses and tacrolimus plus standard of care (SoC) versus SoC alone, in patients at advanced stage of COVID-19 disease with lung injury and systemic hyperinflammatory response. Patients are randomly assigned (1:1) to one of two arms (42 patients in each group). The primary aim is to assess the time to clinical stability after initiating randomization. Clinical stability is defined as body temperature ≤37.5 °C, and PaO2/FiO2 > 400 and/or SatO2/FiO2 > 300, and respiratory rate ≤24 rpm; for 48 consecutive hours. Discussion: Methylprednisolone and tacrolimus might be beneficial to treat those COVID-19 patients progressing into severe pulmonary failure and systemic hyperinflammatory syndrome. The rationale for its use is the fast effect of methylprednisolone pulses and the ability of tacrolimus to inhibit both the CoV-2 replication and the secondary cytokine storm. Interestingly, both drugs are low-cost and can be manufactured on a large scale; thus, if effective and safe, a large number of patients could be treated in developed and developing countries. Trial registration number: NCT04341038 / EudraCT: 2020-001445-39

Biological agents have become key agents for the long-term management of many immune mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID). However, biological therapies are widely conditioned by the great inter and intra-individual pharmacokinetic (PK) variability. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), based on the concentrations of the biological drug and anti-drug antibodies, is a pharmacologically sound tool for the optimization of the IMID treatment with the aim of individualizing the dosing regimen for each patient. The determination of plasma concentrations of the biological agents along with a clinical and analytical interpretation would provide a global evaluation of the patients' condition, a drug exposure optimization and an improvement on the clinical response. Plasma concentrations can be monitored in case of non-response (reactive TDM) or in case of remission to maintain adequate drug exposure (proactive TDM). This article summarizes the information available on the TDM of biological agents for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) optimization. Despite the available evidence on the association between serum drug concentrations and the clinical outcome in RA, further pharmacokinetic (PK) and cost-effectiveness studies are required to implement TDM as an intervention in rheumatology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) represent one of the therapeutic groups of greatest interest in drug development. Because of their complexity (both structural and functional), pharmacokinetic monitoring of biological drugs are essential in routine clinical practice. Absorption of mAb after intramuscular or subcutaneous administration may occur via blood or lymph, and its distribution depends on the mechanism of extravasation, the affinity of mAb for tissue components and tissue clearance (CL). Elimination occurs mainly by intracellular proteolysis following specific (receptormediated) or non-specific endocytosis. On the other hand, the catch and subsequent release of mAb, the redistribution of blood flow by physiological processes, the formation of complexes and the process of recycling through the Brambell receptor are the physiological mechanisms that condition intra-individual pharmacokinetic variability. Furthermore, immunogenicity to mAb, patient weight, and the amount of target antigen are the main factors affecting pharmacokinetic variability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Infliximab, an anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody, has revolutionized the pharmacological management of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). This position statement critically reviews and examines existing data on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab in patients with IMIDs. It provides a practical guide on implementing TDM in current clinical practices and outlines priority areas for future research., Methods: The endorsing TDM of Biologics and Pharmacometrics Committees of the International Association of TDM and Clinical Toxicology collaborated to create this position statement., Results: Accumulating data support the evidence for TDM of infliximab in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases, with limited investigation in other IMIDs. A universal approach to TDM may not fully realize the benefits of improving therapeutic outcomes. Patients at risk for increased infliximab clearance, particularly with a proactive strategy, stand to gain the most from TDM. Personalized exposure targets based on therapeutic goals, patient phenotype, and infliximab administration route are recommended. Rapid assays and home sampling strategies offer flexibility for point-of-care TDM. Ongoing studies on model-informed precision dosing in inflammatory bowel disease will help assess the additional value of precision dosing software tools. Patient education and empowerment, and electronic health record-integrated TDM solutions will facilitate routine TDM implementation. Although optimization of therapeutic effectiveness is a primary focus, the cost-reducing potential of TDM also merits consideration., Conclusions: Successful implementation of TDM for infliximab necessitates interdisciplinary collaboration among clinicians, hospital pharmacists, and (quantitative) clinical pharmacologists to ensure an efficient research trajectory., Competing Interests: Z. Wang is supported by a doctoral research grant from the Research Foundation—Flanders (FWO), Belgium (grant number: 1SF2922N). M. Barclay received consultancy fees from Douglas Pharmaceuticals and Janssen unrelated to submitted work. T. Mizuno served as a consultant of NDA Partners and received speaker honoraria from Astellas Pharma Inc. and Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. R. J. Keizer is an employee and stockholder of InsightRX, a company developing precision dosing software. S. G. Wicha received research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and AqVida, consulting fees from Merck KGaA and Medicines from Malaria Venture, and speaker honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline. J. Lambert received unrestricted grants from AbbVie, Almirall, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen-Cilag, LEO Pharma, Novartis, and UCB, served as a speaker for AbbVie, Almirall, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen-Cilag, Pfizer, and UCB, and served as a consultant for AbbVie, argenx, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Janssen-Cilag, LEO Pharma, Novartis, and UCB, with all fees and grants being paid to Ghent University (Hospital) scientific accounts and not to any personal account of Jo Lambert. S. Vermeire received grants from AbbVie, J&J, Pfizer, Galapagos, and Takeda, received consulting and/or speaker fees from AbbVie, AbolerIS Pharma, AgomAb, Alimentiv, Arena Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Avaxia, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, CVasThera, Dr Falk Pharma, Ferring, Galapagos, Genentech-Roche, Gilead, GSK, Hospira, Imidomics, Janssen, J&J, Lilly, Materia Prima, MiroBio, Morphic, MRM Health, Mundipharma, MSD, Pfizer, Prodigest, Progenity, Prometheus, Robarts Clinical Trials, Second Genome, Shire, Surrozen, Takeda, Theravance, Tillots Pharma AG, and Zealand Pharma. K. Papamichael received lecture/speaker fees from Physicians Education Resource LLC and Grifols, scientific advisory board fees from ProciseDx Inc. and Scipher Medicine Corporation, and serves as a consultant from Prometheus Laboratories Inc. E. Dreesen received consultancy fees from Alimentiv, argenx, and Prometheus, lecture fees from Galapagos, and financial support from Janssen and Sandoz, outside the submitted work, with all honoraria/fees being paid to KU Leuven and not to any personal account of Erwin Dreesen. D. Alsoud, D. J. A. R. Moes, R. Soenen, Z. Layegh, I. K. Minichmayr, G. Wolbink, A. de Vries, and N. Padullés-Zamora declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic demyelinating disease of the central nervous system and long-term disabling. Different disease-modifying treatments are available. These patients, despite being generally young, have high comorbidity and risk of polymedication due to their complex symptomatology and disability., Objective Primary: To determine the type of disease-modifying treatment in patients seen in Spanish hospital pharmacy departments., Secondary Objectives: To determine concomitant treatments, determine the prevalence of polypharmacy, identify the prevalence of interactions and analyse pharmacotherapeutic complexity., Method: Observational, cross-sectional, multicentre study. All patients with a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and active disease-modifying treatment who were seen in outpatient clinics or day hospitals during the second week of February 2021 were included. Modifying treatment, comorbidities and concomitant treatments were collected to determine multimorbidity pattern, polypharmacy, pharmacotherapeutic complexity (Medication Regimen Complexity Index) and drug-drug interactions., Results: 1,407 patients from 57 centres in 15 autonomous communities were included. The most frequent form of disease presentation was the relapsing remitting form (89.3%). The most prescribed disease-modifying treatment was dimethyl fumarate (19.1%), followed by teriflunomide (14.0%). Of the parenteral disease-modifying treatments, the two most prescribed were glatiramer acetate and natalizumab with 11.1% and 10.8%. 24.7% of the patients had one comorbidity and 39.8% had at least 2 comorbidities. 13.3% belonged to at least one of the defined patterns of multimorbidity and 16.5% belonged to 2 or more patterns. The concomitant treatments prescribed were psychotropic drugs (35.5%); antiepileptic drugs (13.9%) and antihypertensive drugs and drugs for cardiovascular pathologies (12.4%). The presence of polypharmacy was 32.7% and extreme polypharmacy 8.1%. The prevalence of interactions was 14.8%. Median pharmacotherapeutic complexity was 8.0 (IQR: 3.3 -- 15.0)., Conclusions: We have described the disease-modifying treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis seen in Spanish pharmacy services and characterised concomitant treatments, the prevalence of polypharmacy, interactions, and their complexity., (Copyright © 2023 Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria (S.E.F.H). Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Evidence on the usefulness of proactive monitoring of vedolizumab serum concentrations during the induction phase of treatment is limited. The objective of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of measuring such concentrations during this phase in predicting response to  treatment in patients with ulcerative colitis with a view to determining whether  patients would benefit from early monitoring of  edolizumab serum concentrations., Method: This was a prospective descriptive study carried out at three public  general hospitals. It included adult patients with ulcerative colitis who were  initiated on vedolizumab at the participating hospitals from June 2019 to June  2020. Vedolizumab serum concentrations were determined  at weeks 6 and 14.  Response to treatment was biologically, clinically, and endoscopically  evaluated at weeks 6, 14, and 52. An analysis was made of the relationship  between vedolizumab serum concentrations at week 6 and early response to  treatment, and of the relationship between the vedolizumab serum  concentrations at weeks 6 and 14 and persistent response at one year., Results: A total of 45 patients were included of whom 22 (49%) were considered non-responsive after one year and required intensification of treatment. The median (interquartile range) vedolizumab serum  oncentrations obtained at 6 weeks was higher in patients who obtained an  early response and in those who maintained the response at one year than  in  those who did not respond to vedolizumab [27.4 (19.0-40.8) μg/mL vs 15.6  (13.4-28.5) μg/mL; p = 0.018] and [29.9 (19.2-43.2) μg/mL vs 18.2 (15.4- 26.9) μg/mL; p = 0.022] respectively. Vedolizumab serum concentrations ≥  17.3 μg/mL at week 6 were predictive of a good early response, and  edolizumab serum concentrations ≥ 26.1 μg/mL at week 6 predicted a  sustained response at one year. No relationship was found between  edolizumab serum concentrations at week 14 and a sustained response., Conclusions: We observed a relationship between vedolizumab serum concentrations determined at week 6, and early and maintained  esponse to vedolizumab therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis, which  supports early drug monitoring during the induction phase to individualize  treatment and increase effectiveness., (Copyright AULA MEDICA EDICIONES 2014. Published by AULA MEDICA. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Severe lung injury is triggered by both the SARS-CoV-2 infection and the subsequent host-immune response in some COVID-19 patients. Methods: We conducted a randomized, single-center, open-label, phase II trial with the aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone pulses and tacrolimus plus standard of care (SoC) vs. SoC alone, in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19. The primary outcome was time to clinical stability within 56 days after randomization. Results: From April 1 to May 2, 2020, 55 patients were prospectively included for subsequent randomization; 27 were assigned to the experimental group and 28 to the control group. The experimental treatment was not associated with a difference in time to clinical stability (hazard ratio 0.73 [95% CI 0.39-1.37]) nor most secondary outcomes. Median methylprednisolone cumulative doses were significantly lower (360 mg [IQR 360-842] vs. 870 mg [IQR 364-1451]; p = 0.007), and administered for a shorter time (median of 4.00 days [3.00-17.5] vs. 18.5 days [3.00-53.2]; p = 0.011) in the experimental group than in the control group. Although not statistically significant, those receiving the experimental therapy showed a numerically lower all-cause mortality than those receiving SoC, especially at day 10 [2 (7.41%) vs. 5 (17.9%); OR 0.39 (95% CI 0.05-2.1); p = 0.282]. The total number of non-serious adverse events was 42 in each the two groups. Those receiving experimental treatment had a numerically higher rate of non-serious infectious adverse events [16 (38%) vs. 10 (24%)] and serious infectious adverse events [7 (35%) vs. 3 (23%)] than those receiving SoC. Conclusions: The combined use of methylprednisolone pulses plus tacrolimus, in addition to the SoC, did not significantly improve the time to clinical stability or other secondary outcomes compared with the SoC alone in severe COVID-19. Although not statistically significant, patients receiving the experimental therapy had numerically lower all-cause mortality than those receiving SoC, supporting recent non-randomized studies with calcineurin inhibitors. It is noteworthy that the present trial had a limited sample size and several other limitations. Therefore, further RCTs should be done to assess the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus to tackle the inflammatory stages of COVID-19. Clinical Trial Registration: Identifier [NCT04341038/EudraCT: 2020-001445-39]., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Solanich, Antolí, Rocamora-Blanch, Padullés, Fanlo-Maresma, Iriarte, Mitjavila, Capdevila, Riera-Mestre, Bas, Vicens-Zygmunt, Niubó, Calvo, Bolivar, Rigo-Bonnin, Mensa-Vilaró, Arregui, Tebe, Videla, Hereu and Corbella.)

Background: Infliximab (IFX) trough concentrations (C min ) have been linked to treatment efficacy in psoriatic patients. Inter-individual IFX C min variability and factors influencing IFX pharmacokinetics could explain differences in treatment response., Objective: To evaluate the association between IFX C min and clinical outcomes in psoriatic patients., Methods: Prospective study of 33 patients with moderate to severe psoriasis receiving IFX at Bellvitge University Hospital, between October 2013 and November 2016. IFX C min and antibodies toward infliximab (ATI) were measured., Results: We collected 155 IFX C min and ATI values (mean age, 46 (14) years; 11 (33.3%) women). Mean IFX C min was 2.5 (2.4) mg/L and ATIs were detected in six patients, resulting in undetectable IFX C min . IFX C min was significantly associated with ATI and body mass index (BMI) (β -2.51, 95% CI -3.56 to -1.4 and β -0.05, 95% CI -0.09 to -0.01). PASI score and PASI 90/100 response were significantly associated with IFX C min (IRR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.92; OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.71 and OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.81)., Conclusion: IFX C min significantly influences PASI 90/100 response rates. IFX C min wa significantly associated with ATI and BMI. The observed inter-individual variability in IFX C min supports the need for IFX drug monitoring.

Introduction: Some COVID-19 patients evolve to severe lung injury and systemic hyperinflammatory syndrome triggered by both the coronavirus infection and the subsequent host-immune response. Accordingly, the use of immunomodulatory agents has been suggested but still remains controversial. Our working hypothesis is that methylprednisolone pulses and tacrolimus may be an effective and safety drug combination for treating severe COVID-19 patients., Methods: and analysis: TACROVID is a randomized, open-label, single-center, phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone pulses and tacrolimus plus standard of care (SoC) versus SoC alone, in patients at advanced stage of COVID-19 disease with lung injury and systemic hyperinflammatory response. Patients are randomly assigned (1:1) to one of two arms (42 patients in each group). The primary aim is to assess the time to clinical stability after initiating randomization. Clinical stability is defined as body temperature ≤37.5 °C, and PaO2/FiO2 > 400 and/or SatO2/FiO2 > 300, and respiratory rate ≤24 rpm; for 48 consecutive hours., Discussion: Methylprednisolone and tacrolimus might be beneficial to treat those COVID-19 patients progressing into severe pulmonary failure and systemic hyperinflammatory syndrome. The rationale for its use is the fast effect of methylprednisolone pulses and the ability of tacrolimus to inhibit both the CoV-2 replication and the secondary cytokine storm. Interestingly, both drugs are low-cost and can be manufactured on a large scale; thus, if effective and safe, a large number of patients could be treated in developed and developing countries., Trial Registration Number: NCT04341038 / EudraCT: 2020-001445-39., Competing Interests: Authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© 2021 The Authors.)

Aims: Therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab can guide clinical decisions in patients with loss of response and in those who can benefit from a de-intensification. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of therapeutic drug monitoring combined with Bayesian forecasting methodology on clinical response in a real-world dataset of patients suffering from inflammatory bowel disease., Methods: We performed a single-centre prospective study with one-group pre-test/post-test design in 108 adult inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with model-based dosing of infliximab maintenance treatment. We recorded clinical activity scores (Harvey-Bradshaw index and partial Mayo) and inflammatory biomarkers per patient., Results: The initial infliximab regimen was maintained in 49 (45.4%) patients and was adjusted in 59 (54.6%) patients (34 treatment intensifications, 9 de-intensifications and 16 treatment discontinuations or therapy replacements). The median time from intervention to index measurement was 126 (103-160) days. The overall proportion of patients in clinical remission increased from 65.7% to 80.4% (P < .0001) and the median infliximab trough concentrations increased from 3.21 (0.99-5.45) to 5.13 mg/L (3.57-6.53) (P < .0001). In the intensified group, the remission rate increased from 35.3% to 61.8% (P = .001) and the percentage of patients in clinical remission or with mild symptoms increased from 76.5% to 94.1%. In the de-intensification cohort, no patients experienced an increase in the Harvey-Bradshaw index or partial Mayo scores, and all patients maintained an infliximab trough concentration of >5 mg/L., Conclusion: In our cohort of inflammatory bowel disease patients, Bayes-based optimized dosing improved the short-term efficacy of infliximab treatment., (© 2020 The British Pharmacological Society.)

Background and Aims: Treating patients based on a treat-to-trough approach has been shown to be a cost-effective strategy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients who have become unresponsive to infliximab (IFX). However, the documented evidence for this is limited, and some controversy remains regarding the use of routine proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). To support routine TDM of IFX and regimen optimization in IBD patients, more in-depth knowledge of the covariates that affect the pharmacokinetic (PK) variability of IFX is needed. The aim of this study was to identify the characteristics of the patient, disease, and treatments that influence IFX PK and exposure in our cohort of IBD patients using a repeated-measures design., Methods: We performed a prospective observational study of adult IBD patients who received IFX between July 2013 and March 2017. We obtained repeated IFX trough concentration (Cmin) measurements and implemented a previously described population pharmacokinetic model to estimate individual clearance (CL). From the individual primary parameters, the area under the curve (AUC), half-life (t1/2), and central elimination rate constant (K10) were estimated. We performed a repeated-measures analysis to evaluate whether patient characteristics, disease status, concomitant immunosuppressive therapy, and immunogenicity are associated with IFX Cmin and PK parameters., Results: We collected 429 Cmin measurements from 112 patients. The median of the Cmin values was 3.62 mg/L (1.47-6.02). Antibodies to IFX (ATI) were detected in 14 patients. The predicted median AUC was 28,421 mg/h/L (22,336-36,903). The median individual predicted CL, K10, and t1/2 values were 4.77 mL/kg/day (3.88-5.90), 0.09 days (0.08-0.12), and 12.22 days (9.49-14.87), respectively. IFX Cmin, AUC, CL, and K10 were significantly influenced by ATI and serum albumin concentrations. Moreover, body weight was significantly associated with AUC, CL, and K10. Patients receiving concurrent immunosuppressive therapy had higher Cmin and AUC values and lower CL and K10 values than those treated with IFX monotherapy. We also observed high intrapatient variability in Cmin values during the study period., Conclusions: In this repeated-measures study in a population of IBD patients, we observed significant associations between ATI, serum albumin concentration, concomitant immunosuppressive therapy, body weight and gender, and IFX Cmin, and CL. The high PK variability observed in this study supports the need for proactive TDM to optimize the use of IFX as early as possible in IBD patients.

Background: Infliximab (IFX) trough levels vary markedly between patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which is important for clinical response. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of previously developed population pharmacokinetic models in patients with IBD for dose individualization for Crohn disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis in our clinical setting., Methods: The authors collected 370 trough levels prospectively from 100 adult patients with IBD who were undergoing IFX treatment between July 2013 and August 2016. The external evaluation included prediction- and simulation-based diagnostics [prediction-corrected visual predictive check, prediction- and variability-corrected visual predictive check, and normalized prediction distribution error tests]., Results: In prediction-based diagnostics, the authors observed a nonsignificant overall mean relative bias of -6.87% and an acceptable imprecision of 8.45%. Approximately 100% of the prediction error was within ±30%, indicating satisfactory predictability. Simulation-based diagnostics indicated model misspecification; thus, the model may not be appropriate for simulation-based applications., Conclusions: While simulation-based diagnostics provided unsatisfactory results, the prediction-based diagnostics demonstrate that the population pharmacokinetic model developed by Fasanmade et al for CD can be used to predict and design individualized IFX dose regimens that meet the individual needs of patients with CD and ulcerative colitis.

Introduction: Most of the cost-effectiveness analyses are based on estimations to make decisions on the future implementation of a test. However, the model should be verified with real data to prove that previous estimations have been successfully fulfilled., Objective: To study the economic impact of the systematic HLA-B*57:01 genotyping in preventing hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) in the patient population of a tertiary-care hospital treated with abacavir (ABC) using retrospective data of 5 years of experience., Methods: A retrospective study was carried out with two cohorts including 780 and 473 patients before and after the implementation of the systematic HLA-B*57:01 genotyping before ABC treatment. Cost-effectiveness analysis was carried out by the parameter 'cost per HSR avoided'. The clinical utility of the test was verified by evaluating the differences in HSR incidence between both cohorts. Finally, a sensitivity analysis including all variables was carried out., Results: In the population studied, systematic genotyping represents an additional cost of &OV0556;306 per HSR avoided. In the sensitivity analysis, pharmacological therapy cost is the major influencing factor found in the estimation of the 'cost per HSR avoided'. In terms of clinical utility, the incidence ratio was 0.040 (95% confidence interval 0.0009-0.2399) and statistically significant differences were found between both groups (P=1.40×10)., Conclusion: Retrospective data from 5 years of experience have confirmed the cost-effectiveness of the systematic genotyping in candidate patients for ABC therapy, and have shown that cost-effectiveness is a dynamic parameter closely linked to allele prevalence and pharmacological therapy costs.

Objective: Dual PEGylated interferon-α (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin therapy has been the main hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment of the last decade. Current direct-acting antiviral agents have improved the outcome of therapy but also have increased the cost and management complexity of treatment. The current study analyzes host genetics, viral and clinical predictors of sustained viral response (SVR) to dual PEG-IFN and ribavirin therapy in a representative Spanish population., Methods: Observational prospective multicentre pharmacogenetic cohort study conducted in 12 different hospitals of 12 different Spanish regions. A total of 98 patients with SVR and 106 with non-SVR in response to PEG-IFN and ribavirin therapy were included. 33 single nucleotide polymorphisms located in 24 different genes related with inflammatory, immune and virus response were selected. Clinical and viral data were also analyzed as candidate of SVR predictors., Results: IL-28B (rs12979860, rs7248668, rs8105790, rs8099917) and TNFRSF1B (rs1061622) genotypes, as well as TNFRSF1B/IL-10/TNFα (-308) non-TTG and TNFRSF1B/IL- 10/IL-4 non-TTC haplotypes together with lower age, lower basal HCV RNA load, higher basal serum LDL cholesterol values, VHC genotypes 2 and 3 and basal low grade fibrosis 0-2 were associated with a SVR in the univariate analysis. Independent predictors of SVR in the multivariate analysis were IL-28B rs12979860 CC, TNFRSF1B/IL-10/IL-4 non-TTC along with low baseline HCV RNA load and HCV genotypes 2 and 3., Conclusions: IL-28B rs12979860 CC, TNFRSF1B/ IL-10/ IL-4 non-TTC haplotype, low baseline HCV RNA load and HCV genotypes 2 and 3 may help to predict successful outcome to PEG-IFN/ribavirin therapy in Spanish population., (Copyright AULA MEDICA EDICIONES 2014. Published by AULA MEDICA. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety profile of omalizumab treatment. The conditions under which omalizumab was prescribed agreed with those in Xolair® drug information: age > 12 years old, severe uncontrolled asthma, FEV1 < 80%, IgE 30-700 UI/ml and positive test results for perennial allergens., Methods: Asthmatic patients treated with omalizumab between January 2010 and July 2011 were evaluated retrospectively. Age, sex, weight, IgE level, concomitant asthma medications, change in FEV1, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, asthma exacerbations and corticosteroids bursts were recorded before and after omalizumab initiation. A 1.5- year period was chosen., Results: A total of 22 patients were included. The mean weight of subjects was 73 Kg (range, 51-102). Mean IgE was 203 UI/ml (range, 30-992) and mean FEV1 60% (range, 30-93%) at baseline. Adverse events were observed in 4 patients. There were no significant changes in FEV1 values after omalizumab treatment but omalizumab was associated with a reduction in concomitant asthma medications use in 14 patients and improvements in global asthma control in 12., Conclusion: In these patients add-on therapy with omalizumab reduced asthma exacerbations and emergency visits or hospitalizations. Only 55% of patients significantly improved global asthma control and no significant changes in FEV1 were observed., (Copyright © 2013 SEFH. Published by AULA MEDICA. All rights reserved.)

Background: Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta (PEG-EPO) is indicated for the treatment of anaemia due to chronic kidney disease. Its long half-life allows it to be administered once per month in maintenance therapy., Objective: To evaluate the use, effectiveness and cost of PEG-EPO in a group of pre-dialysis chronic renal failure patients., Method: Retrospective observational study in pre-dialysis patients who began treatment with PEG-EPO between May 2008 and February 2009. The following data were gathered: age, sex, haemoglobin levels (Hb) and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) dose and frequency. The follow-up period was 12 months., Results: We included 198 patients. Mean Hb upon starting PEG-EPO in patients who had received no prior treatment was 10.8g/l, and 11.6g/l at 90 days (P<.0001). In patients previously treated with ESA, mean Hb before starting PEG-EPO treatment was 11.2g/l, and 11.4g/l at 12 months (P=.846). Hb values were higher than 12g/l (P<.0001) after 12 months of treatment in 25% of patients; of these, 45% had values above 13g/l. We observed doses 39% lower than those indicated on the drug leaflet, resulting in a reduction in the originally expected theoretical costs., Conclusions: The doses of PEG-EPO administered to patients with a prior history of ESA treatment were lower than those indicated by the drug leaflet, and Hb remained stable after 12 months of treatment. A large portion of the patients had levels above the 13g/l threshold.

Objective: Alpha1-antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency is a codominant autosomal genetic disorder that predisposes a patient to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and emphysema. Specific treatment is systemic, consisting of intravenous infusion of AAT. The protocol currently recommended by the Spanish Registry is infusion of 180 mg/kg every 21 days. The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetic behavior of AAT and estimate the level of protection, defined as the percentage of time that the AAT plasma concentration was above the assumed protective threshold of 50 mg/dL with the usual protocol and with other alternative ones., Material and Methods: Plasma concentrations at 4 times were analyzed for 9 patients to profile the pharmacokinetics of AAT. The data were fitted to a single compartment open model with the WinNonlin software package. The duration of protection was estimated by simulating the evolution of AAT plasma activity over time according to the model constructed based on data recorded in the study., Results: Five men and 4 women (mean weight, 69 kg; range, 59-84 kg) were given a mean AAT dose of 12.06 g (range, 11-15 g). The mean (SD) volume infused was 516.67 (88.17) mL. The half-life of AAT was 8.7 days and the volume of distribution was 127.6 mL/kg. The currently recommended treatment protocol (180 mg/kg every 21 days) gave a level of protection of 67% (considering 60 mg/dL to be protective threshold) or 76% (for a threshold of 50 mg/dL). Protection values for the alternative protocol of 120 mg/kg every 14 days were 82% and 100%, respectively. For the alternative protocol of 60 mg/kg every 7 days, protection was 100% for both thresholds., Conclusions: Profiling the pharmacokinetic behavior of AAT has enabled the coverage time to be assessed for several treatment protocols. The regimen of 120 mg/kg every 14 days had the most appropriate profile.

Several reports have described a decrease in valproic acid (VPA) serum concentrations when carbapenem therapy is administered. The exact mechanism of this pharmacokinetic interaction is unknown, although several experimental studies have been carried out in animals. Because of these interactions, plasma concentrations of VPA in these patients should be monitored and, whenever possible, VPA or carbapenem therapy should be substituted by other drugs. We describe the cases of two epileptic children who simultaneously received meropenem and VPA. Concentrations of VPA decreased to subtherapeutic levels. We review the various mechanisms for this interaction proposed to date, as well as all reported cases.