Search

Surface modification techniques were employed in order to provide functionalized silicone rubber with enhanced cytocompatibility. Acrylic acid (AAc), methacrylic acid (MAAc) and glycidylmethacrylate (GMA) were graft-co-polymerized onto the surface of silicone induced by an argon plasma and thermal initiation. The polymerizations were carried out in solution, in the case of acrylic acid a vapor phase graft-co-polymerization subsequent to argon plasma activation was carried out as well. Human fibronectin (hFn), which acts as a cell adhesion mediator for fibroblasts, was immobilized by making use of the generated carboxylic or epoxy groups, respectively. Surface analysis was accomplished by means of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), infrared spectroscopy in attenuated total reflection mode (IR-ATR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM) and dynamic contact angle measurements using the Wilhelmy-plate method. The amount of immobilized active hFn was semiquantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using a structure-specific antibody against the cell-binding domain of hFn. In vitro testing showed a remarkable difference between surfaces exposing adsorbed-only and surfaces with covalently immobilized hFn. © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers

Background Silicone intraocular lenses as well as silicone sponges and encircling bands on the bulbar surface are widely used and are well tolerated. The aim of this project is a new one-piece silicone keratoprosthesis with enhanced cell adhesion in the haptic region to optimize the keratoprosthesis stability. These investigations show how enhanced profileration of conjunctival fibroblasts and, therefore, improved tissue compatibility can be achieved by hydrophilizing and by protein immobilisation on a hydrophobic silicone surface. This allows a combination of desired chemical and mechanical properties of the silicone bulk material with surfaces of improved tissue compatibility. Methods Silicone foils with surface modifications of different kinds were tested. Experiments were done using cell cultures with murine fibroblasts L-929 and human conjuctival fibroblasts. Cytotoxicity assays were carried out with cells grown on the material in direct contact, as well as in indirect contact, with extracts (EN 30993-5). Viability stains by means of fluoresceindiacetate and ethidiumbromide together with morphology analyses by hemalaun-staining were performed. Results For the unmodified and modified foils themselves and their extracts any negative influence on cell cultures of murine and human cells could be excluded. There was a gradual improvement of cell morphology, spreading and proliferation dependent on the degree of surface modification. Covalently immobilised fibronectin showed the best results in contrast to adsorptive binding. Conclusions Silicone surfaces can be modified chemically with bioactive proteins. These modifications are cell compatible and do not result in toxic reactions. The degree and type of silicone hydrophilization results in improved development of cell morphology, spreading and proliferation. Even better results are obtained after covalent binding of bioactive proteins like fibronectin. Improved biocompatibility with enhanced cellular overgrowth has been demonstrated in vitro for the modified silicone of the haptic region. We believe that this type of modification will help in reducing extrusion problems observed with former keratoprostheses.

Background None of the keratoprostheses available today is absolutely successful in the long term, neither the problems of extrusion, retroprosthetic membrane formation and intraocular pressure rise are yet solved. A new type of keratoprosthesis is required which can show improved ingrowth characteristics and allow intraocular pressure measurements. In order to possibly meet the above mentioned requirements we developed a flexible silicone keratoprosthesis with scleral fixation and chemical surface modification. Methods The one-piece keratoprosthesis is made of silicone rubber. Its optical zone has a diameter of 11 mm and is 0.3 mm thick. The surface-modified haptic consists of a scleral rim and eight branches for scleral fixation. A ridge at the back of the keratoprosthesis fitting into the trephination hole shall avoid leakage and retroprosthetic membrane formation. Optical and mechanical qualities are characterised by tensile tests, spectrophotometry and topography. Results A method for keratoprosthesis-production was established. The optical quality of the device was improved by submicron lathing of the mould. Spectrophotometry showed high visible and ultraviolet light transmission of the silicone. Mechanical tests with silicone samples revealed high tensile strength and elongation at break. The mechanical properties were not impaired by surface modification. Conclusions The production of a flexible silicone keratoprosthesis with high optical and mechanical properties was established. Its use both for the treatment of permanently opacified corneas and as temporary keratoprosthesis seems to be possible.