12 results on '"Naber, I"'
Search Results
2. Überprüfung einer entwickelten Versorgungsstruktur zur Bewegungsförderung für Menschen mit nichtübertragbaren Erkrankungen – Protokoll über eine pragmatische Studie im Cluster-Design
- Author
-
Weissenfels, A, Mino, E, Naber, I, Klamroth, S, Gelius, P, Geidl, W, Abu-Omar, K, and Pfeifer, K
- Subjects
ddc: 610 ,Medicine and health - Abstract
Hintergrund und Stand (inter)nationaler Forschung: Aufgrund zunehmender Inaktivität in der Bevölkerung und damit einhergehender gesundheitlicher sowie ökonomischer Folgen sind gezielte Maßnahmen zur Förderung von Bewegung ein relevanter Teil der Versorgungsforschung geworden. [zum vollständigen Text gelangen Sie über die oben angegebene URL] more...
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
3. Bewertung bestehender Versorgungsketten zur Bewegungsförderung im deutschen Gesundheitssystem
- Author
-
Naber, I, Weissenfels, A, Geidl, W, Mino, E, Klamroth, S, Gelius, P, Abu-Omar, K, and Pfeifer, K
- Subjects
ddc: 610 ,Medicine and health - Abstract
Hintergrund und Stand (inter)nationaler Forschung: Im internationalen Kontext sind Bewegungsversorgungsketten (BVKs) bereits erfolgreich in die Regelversorgung eingebettet (z.B. Schweden). Dies befürworten auch die nationalen Empfehlungen für Bewegung und Bewegungsförderung, um nachhaltig [zum vollständigen Text gelangen Sie über die oben angegebene URL] more...
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. BewegtVersorgt: co-development of a physical activity referral scheme for use in the German healthcare system
- Author
-
Mino, E, Naber, I, Weissenfels, A, Klamroth, S, Geidl, W, Gelius, P, Abu-Omar, K, Pfeifer, K, Mino, E, Naber, I, Weissenfels, A, Klamroth, S, Geidl, W, Gelius, P, Abu-Omar, K, and Pfeifer, K
- Published
- 2021
5. Etablierung von Versorgungsketten zur Bewegungsförderung für Menschen mit nichtübertragbaren Erkrankungen - ein partizipativer Ansatz im Projekt BewegtVersorgt
- Author
-
Naber, I, Weissenfels, A, Klamroth, S, Mino, E, Geidl, W, Gelius, P, Abu-Omar, K, Naber, I, Weissenfels, A, Klamroth, S, Mino, E, Geidl, W, Gelius, P, and Abu-Omar, K
- Published
- 2020
6. Are physical activity referral scheme components associated with increased physical activity, scheme uptake, and adherence rate? A meta-analysis and meta-regression.
- Author
-
Mino E, Pfeifer K, Hanson CL, Schuler M, Brandmeier A, Klamroth S, Naber I, Weissenfels A, McHale S, Abu-Omar K, Gelius P, Whiting S, Wickramasinghe K, Galea G, and Geidl W
- Subjects
- Adult, Humans, Health Promotion methods, Exercise, Patient Compliance, Referral and Consultation
- Abstract
Background: Physical activity referral schemes (PARS) are composed of various components, such as a written prescription or a person-centered approach. The role of these components in their effectiveness is yet to be understood. Therefore, we aimed to explore the relationships between PARS components and physical activity, scheme uptake, and adherence rate; and to estimate the effect of PARS., Methods: We searched Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, HTA, Wiley Online Library, SAGE Journals, Taylor & Francis, Google Scholar, OpenGrey, and CORE. Eligible studies were published between 1990 and November 2023 in English or German, investigated PARS with participants aged ≥ 16 years, and reported physical activity, scheme uptake, or scheme adherence. Separate random-effects meta-analysis by comparison group were conducted for physical activity. Scheme uptake and adherence rates were pooled using proportional meta-analysis. The components were analyzed via univariate meta-regression. We rated the risk of bias using RoB2 and ROBINS-I, and the certainty of evidence using GRADE., Results: Fifty-two studies were included. PARS were more effective in increasing physical activity than usual care (k = 11, n = 5046, Hedges' g = 0.18, 95%CI 0.12 to 0.25; high certainty of evidence). When PARS were compared with physical activity advice or enhanced scheme versions, the pooled Hedges' g values for physical activity were -0.06 (k = 5, n = 1082, 95%CI -0.21 to 0.10; low certainty of evidence), and 0.07 (k = 9, n = 2647, 95%CI -0.03 to 0.18; low certainty of evidence) respectively. Scheme uptake was 87% (95%CI 77% to 94%, k = 14, n = 5000) across experimental studies and 68% (95%CI 51% to 83%, k = 14, n = 25,048) across non-experimental studies. Pooled scheme adherence was 68% (95%CI 55% to 80%, k = 16, n = 3939) and 53% (95%CI 42% to 63%, k = 18, n = 14,605). The meta-regression did not detect any significant relationships between components and physical activity or scheme uptake. A person-centered approach, screening, and brief advice were positively associated with scheme adherence, while physical activity sessions were negatively associated., Conclusion: PARS are more effective in increasing physical activity than usual care only. We did not identify any components as significant predictors of physical activity and scheme uptake. Four components predicted scheme adherence, indicating that the component-effectiveness relationship warrants further research., (© 2024. The Author(s).) more...
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Coproducing a physical activity referral scheme in Germany: a qualitative analysis of stakeholder experiences.
- Author
-
Klamroth S, Mino E, Naber I, Weissenfels A, Geidl W, Gelius P, Abu-Omar K, and Pfeifer K
- Subjects
- Humans, Germany, Stakeholder Participation, Interviews as Topic, Delivery of Health Care, Qualitative Research, Referral and Consultation, Exercise
- Abstract
Objectives: This study evaluated stakeholders' experiences of participating in a coproduction process to develop a physical activity referral scheme (PARS) in the German healthcare system. The focus was on examining facilitators and challenges, along with gathering insights on potential modifications to the joint development process, all from the viewpoint of stakeholders., Design: This qualitative study employed one-to-one semi-structured interviews, and the findings were analysed using summarising qualitative content analysis., Setting: The study focused on the German healthcare system., Participants: Seven stakeholders from the coproduction process were purposefully selected for interviews using maximum variation sampling. The interviewees represented different sectors (physician associations, physical activity professionals' associations, health insurance companies and patient organisations), various positions within their organisations, and different levels of attendance during the coproduction process., Results: In almost all interviews, the following factors were highlighted as facilitators of the development process: coproduction approach, process of coproduction, multi-sector stakeholder group, possibility of active participation, coordinating role of researchers, communication, atmosphere and interaction. In contrast, differences in roles and hierarchy, merging of different perspectives, clarification of intervention costs, and competition and conflicting interests were pointed out as challenges. Only a few suggestions regarding adaptations in terms of group composition and cooperation among stakeholders were mentioned., Conclusions: Stakeholder experiences with the joint development process were predominantly positive, indicating that coproduction is a beneficial approach for the development of PARS intended for integration into healthcare systems. The effective management of power differences among stakeholders is intricately tied to the coproduction method; therefore, it should be selected carefully. The research team plays a pivotal role in coordinating and negotiating the process, and the team should be equipped with a diverse set of skills and knowledge, particularly to understand the intricacies of the healthcare system where the PARS is intended for implementation., Trial Registration Number: NCT04947787., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.) more...
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. A systematic review and narrative synthesis of physical activity referral schemes' components.
- Author
-
Mino E, Hanson CL, Naber I, Weissenfels A, McHale S, Saftig J, Klamroth S, Gelius P, Abu-Omar K, Whiting S, Wickramasinghe K, Galea G, Pfeifer K, and Geidl W
- Subjects
- Adult, Humans, Prescriptions, Referral and Consultation, Exercise, Motor Activity
- Abstract
Background: Physical activity referral schemes (PARS) are complex multicomponent interventions that represent a promising healthcare-based concept for physical activity (PA) promotion. This systematic review and narrative synthesis aimed to identify the constitutive components of PARS and provide an overview of their effectiveness., Methods: Following a published protocol, we conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, HTA, Wiley Online Library, SAGE Journals, Taylor & Francis, Google Scholar, OpenGrey, and CORE from 1990 to January 2023. We included experimental, quasi-experimental, and observational studies that targeted adults participating in PARS and reported PA outcomes, scheme uptake, or adherence rates. We performed an intervention components analysis using the PARS taxonomy to identify scheme components and extracted data related to uptake, adherence, and PA behavior change. We combined these to provide a narrative summary of PARS effectiveness., Results: We included 57 studies reporting on 36 PARS models from twelve countries. We identified 19 PARS components: a patient-centered approach, individualized content, behavior change theory and techniques, screening, brief advice, written materials, a written prescription, referral, baseline and exit consultation, counselling support session(s), PA sessions, education session(s), action for non-attendance, structured follow-up, a PA network, feedback for the referrer, and exit strategies/routes. The PARS models contained a mean of 7 ± 2.9 components (range = 2-13). Forty-five studies reported PA outcome data, 28 reported uptake, and 34 reported adherence rates. Of these, approximately two-thirds of studies reported a positive effect on participant PA levels, with a wide range of uptake (5.7-100.0%) and adherence rates (8.5-95.0%)., Conclusions: Physical activity referral scheme components are an important source of complexity. Despite the heterogeneous nature of scheme designs, our synthesis was able to identify 19 components. Further research is required to determine the influence of these components on PARS uptake, adherence, and PA behavior change. To facilitate this, researchers and scheme providers must report PARS designs in more detail. Process evaluations are also needed to examine implementation and increase our understanding of what components lead to which outcomes. This will facilitate future comparisons between PARS and enable the development of models to maximize impact., (© 2023. The Author(s).) more...
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Effectiveness and implementation success of a co-produced physical activity referral scheme in Germany: study protocol of a pragmatic cluster randomised trial.
- Author
-
Weissenfels A, Klamroth S, Carl J, Naber I, Mino E, Geidl W, Gelius P, Abu-Omar K, and Pfeifer K
- Subjects
- Delivery of Health Care, Germany, Humans, Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Referral and Consultation, Exercise physiology, Quality of Life
- Abstract
Background: While effective physical activity referral schemes (PARSs) and related structures for promoting physical activity (PA) already exist in several countries, in Germany, PARSs have not yet been implemented systematically and nationwide. Through a co-production approach with relevant actors in the German healthcare system, a PARS was developed, and an implementation plan was created (e.g. financing). This study protocol aims to evaluate the developed PARS for people with non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in Germany regarding its potential effectiveness and implementation success., Methods: To evaluate the effectiveness and implementation success of the PARS, we will apply a pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial (cRCT) in Hybrid II design by comparing two intervention groups (PARS vs PA advice [PAA]). The trial will take place in the Nürnberg metropolitan region, with 24 physician practices recruiting 567 people with NCDs. Both groups will receive brief PA advice from a physician to initially increase the participants' motivation to change their activity level. Subsequently, the PARS group will be given individualised support from an exercise professional to increase their PA levels and be transferred to local exercise opportunities. In contrast, participants in the PAA group will receive only the brief PA advice as well as information and an overview of regional PA offerings to become more active at their own initiative. After 12 and 24 weeks, changes in moderate to vigorous PA and in physical activity-related health competence (movement competence, control competence, self-regulation competence) will be measured as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes will include changes in quality of life. To measure implementation success, we refer to the RE-AIM framework and draw on patient documentation, interviews, focus groups and surveys of the participating actors (physicians, exercise professionals)., Discussion: Through a between-group comparison, we will investigate whether additional individual support by an exercise professional compared to brief PA advice alone leads to higher PA levels in people with NCDs. The acceptance and feasibility of both interventions in routine care in the German healthcare system will also be evaluated., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04947787 . Registered 01 June 2021., (© 2022. The Author(s).) more...
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Coproduction to improve preventive health services-experiences from Germany.
- Author
-
Abu-Omar K, Weissenfels A, Mino E, Naber I, Klamroth S, Geidl W, and Pfeifer K
- Subjects
- Delivery of Health Care, Germany, Humans, Preventive Health Services, Exercise, Referral and Consultation
- Abstract
Due to the beneficial impact of regular physical activity (PA) on non-communicable diseases, the number of countries integrating exercise referral schemes (ERSs) into their healthcare systems is growing. Owing to the limitations of existing PA promotion concepts in Germany's healthcare system, efforts are currently being made towards developing a nationwide referral pathway. A research group at the Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg is coordinating these efforts within a project funded by the Federal Ministry of Health. The aim is to develop, implement and evaluate a regional-level ERS that has the potential to be scaled up across Germany in the event of its demonstrated effectiveness. The project is based on an adapted Cooperative Planning approach requiring interaction between the academic sector and different actors of the healthcare sector. The present commentary reflects on challenges faced in the early stages of the co-production process. Besides the development of an adequate co-production methodology, it critically discusses stakeholder participation, knowledge gaps and actors' willingness to take responsibility. In addition, although patients are represented by dedicated organizations, their perspective cannot be adequately captured using a co-production approach. Despite the joint development of an ERS, there remain important questions regarding the appropriateness of the co-production approach in a healthcare setting., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press.) more...
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Physical activity referral scheme components: a study protocol for systematic review and meta-regression.
- Author
-
Mino E, Geidl W, Naber I, Weissenfels A, Klamroth S, Gelius P, Abu-Omar K, and Pfeifer K
- Subjects
- Humans, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Primary Health Care, Referral and Consultation, Systematic Reviews as Topic, Exercise, Research Design
- Abstract
Introduction: In its attempt to establish effective physical activity promotion methods, research on physical activity referral schemes (PARS) is attracting significant attention. Sometimes known as physical activity on prescription schemes, PARS involve a well-defined procedure whereby a primary healthcare professional introduces a participant to the topic of physical activity and employs prescription or referral forms to connect the participant to physical activity opportunities, such as local fitness offers. The planned systematic review will focus on these referral routes and scheme components and how they are integrated into various PARS models worldwide. We seek to identify the evidence-based core components that play the most important roles in the effectiveness of PARS., Methods and Analysis: The development and reporting of the protocol follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines. We plan to conduct a systematic main literature search on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, HTA, SpringerLink and other databases. We will include studies that report outcomes on physical activity, PARS uptake and adherence rates or descriptive information about PARS models. We intend for all review stages, citation screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment to be conducted by at least two independent reviewers. As a broad spectrum of study designs, including randomised and non-randomised studies of interventions and mixed methods, will be eligible, we will use three separate tools to assess the risk of bias in individual studies. The data will be primarily synthesised narratively, following Intervention Component Analysis. If the data allow, we will perform a random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression to investigate the impact of specific PARS components on effect sizes., Ethics and Dissemination: This systematic review does not require formal ethics approval. The results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and international conferences to reach the scientific community., Prospero Registration Number: CRD42021233229., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.) more...
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Development, implementation, evaluation and scaling-up of physical activity referral schemes in Germany: protocol for a study using a co-production approach.
- Author
-
Weissenfels A, Geidl W, Mino E, Naber I, Klamroth S, Gelius P, Abu-Omar K, and Pfeifer K
- Subjects
- Adult, Germany, Humans, Primary Health Care, Research Design, Exercise, Referral and Consultation
- Abstract
Introduction: Physical activity referral schemes (PARSs) are recommended to promote physical activity (PA) among adults at risk of developing or with established non-communicable diseases (NCDs). In Germany, this kind of referral schemes has not yet been implemented systematically and nationwide. In this study protocol, we present the methodological design of a co-production research study aimed at establishing a PARS for adults with NCDs in German primary healthcare., Methods and Analysis: We will employ a co-production approach consistently throughout the four project phases: (1) development of the PARS; (2) preparation period; (3) implementation and evaluation; (4) development of a strategic plan for scaling up the PARS to the national level as part of standard care. The first phase will additionally include a status quo analysis of the existing physical activity pathways nationwide as well as an overview of international PARS models. A pragmatic trial design will be used for evaluating the developed PARS. The co-production approach will involve relevant actors in the German healthcare system, namely, healthcare service providers (eg, physicians, exercise professionals), health insurance providers, exercise providers, patients' representatives, experts in the development and implementation of educational concepts, and scientists from the fields of sports science and public health., Ethics and Dissemination: The project has been reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of the Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (ethics approval number: 331_20 B). Through cooperation agreements, the stakeholders involved gave their consent to participate and were informed about the study in detail. The results of this study will be disseminated by international conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications, and if possible, a manual for the use of the PARS will be provided., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.) more...
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.